First Report of Perfluorobutane Microsphere-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Transplant Kidney

Comparing Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for differentially diagnosing renal lesions: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced (CE) ultrasound using Sonazoid (SNZ-CEUS) by comparing with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

306 consecutive patients (from 7 centers) with renal masses (40 benign tumors, 266 malignant tumors) diagnosed by both SNZ-CEUS, CE-CT or CE-MRI were enrolled between September 2020 and February 2021. The examinations were performed within 7 days, but the sequence was not fixed. Histologic results were available for 301 of 306 (98.37%) lesions and 5 lesions were considered benign after at least 2 year follow-up without change in size and image characteristics. The diagnostic performances were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and compared by McNemar's test.

RESULTS

In the head-to-head comparison, SNZ-CEUS and CE-MRI had comparable sensitivity (95.60 vs. 94.51%, P = 0.997), specificity (65.22 vs. 73.91%, P = 0.752), positive predictive value (91.58 vs. 93.48%) and negative predictive value (78.95 vs. 77.27%); SNZ-CEUS and CE-CT showed similar sensitivity (97.31 vs. 96.24%, P = 0.724); however, SNZ-CEUS had relatively lower than specificity than CE-CT (59.09 vs. 68.18%, P = 0.683). For nodules > 4 cm, CE-MRI demonstrated higher specificity than SNZ-CEUS (90.91 vs. 72.73%, P = 0.617) without compromise the sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

SNZ-CEUS, CE-CT, and CE-MRI demonstrate desirable and comparable sensitivity for the differentiation of renal mass. However, the specificity of all three imaging modalities is not satisfactory. SNZ-CEUS may be a suitable alternative modality for patients with renal dysfunction and those allergic to gadolinium or iodine-based agents.

Clinical Significance of Renal Allograft Urothelial Thickening Identified by Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

To assess the etiology and clinical implications of ultrasound (US)-diagnosed urothelial thickening (UT) in renal transplants.

METHODS

Patients with renal transplants who had UT diagnosed by US from January 2000 to December 2018 were retrospectively identified and compared to patients with transplants without UT scanned during the study period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, US findings, pathologic results, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes and compared between groups by Fisher exact and t tests.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients with UT and 128 controls comprised our cohorts. The patient age in the UT group versus controls (mean ± SD, 50.2 ± 16.5 versus 51.2 ± 15.3 years) and the time since transplant (2.9 ± 4.2 versus 2.4 ± 5.8 years) were similar. Patients with UT were more likely to be female than controls (76 of 143 [53.1%] versus 53 of 128 [41.4%]; P = .07), but the difference was not statistically significant, and patients with UT were more likely to have indwelling stents (31 of 143 [21.7%] versus 9 of 128 [7.0%]; P = .001) and hydronephrosis (25 of 143 [17.4%] versus 11 of 128 [8.6%]; P = .03). At biopsy, rejection and vascular sclerosis were more likely in patients with UT compared to controls (24 of 25 [49.0%] versus 11 of 43 [25.6%]; P = .031; 42 of 49 [85.7%] versus 22 of 43 [51.2%]; P = .0005, respectively), whereas acute tubular necrosis was similar. The sensitivity (50.0%) and specificity (74.4%) of UT for rejection were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Urothelial thickening correlates with US findings of urinary obstruction and indwelling stents, suggesting a possible mechanical component to UT's etiology. Although transplant rejection and vascular sclerosis were more frequent at biopsy in the UT group than controls, UT had low sensitivity and specificity for rejection.