Recipient Comorbidity and Survival Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A UK-wide Prospective Cohort Study

Desensitization With Imlifidase for HLA-Incompatible Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi International Expert Consensus

Highly sensitized (HS) patients in need of kidney transplantation (KTx) typically spend a longer time waiting for compatible kidneys, are unlikely to receive an organ offer, and are at increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Desensitization using imlifidase, which is more rapid and removes total body immunoglobulin G (IgG) to a greater extent than other methods, enables transplantation to occur between HLA-incompatible (HLAi) donor-recipient pairs and allows patients to have greater access to KTx. However, when the project was launched there was limited data and clinical experience with desensitization in general and with imlifidase specifically. Hence, this Delphi methodology was used to reach a consensus from a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) of experts from 15 countries on the management of HS patients undergoing imlifidase HLAi from a deceased donor (DD) KTx. This Delphi consensus provides clinical practice guidance on the use of imlifidase in the end-to-end management of HS patients undergoing an HLAi DD KTx and supports centers in the development of guidelines for the utilization and integration of imlifidase into clinical practice.

Immunosuppressant drug tacrolimus inhibits HUVEC angiogenesis and production of placental growth factor

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a cornerstone of immunosuppression in solid organ transplants, but its use is linked with the development of endothelial dysfunction. Pregnant solid organ transplant recipients are four to six times more likely to develop preeclampsia, which is also associated with endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, this in vitro study investigated the acute effects of tacrolimus on the expression of common angiogenic factors related to preeclampsia, and effects on angiogeneis in primary human tissues.

METHODS

Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to tacrolimus (0, 5, 20, 50 ng/mL) for 24h alone, or in combination with tumour necrosis factor (TNF, 10 ng/mL) and high dose glucose (25 mM). Cell culture concentrations of sFlt-1, PlGF and activin A were measured. In addition, the effect of tacrolimus on markers of endothelial dysfunction and permeability were assessed, as were the effect of tacrolimus on tube formation. Angiogenic factors and mRNA markers of oxidative stress and inflammation were also assessed in primary placental tissue after an acute 24 h exposure to tacrolimus.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus exposure significantly reduced HUVEC secretion of PlGF, increased production of activin A, andreduced tubular structure formation without impacting cell permeability or viability. There was no change in ICAM1 or VCAM1 expression in HUVECs treated with tacrolimus treatment alone, however co-culture with TNF significantly increased expression of ICAM1 and VCAM1. In placental explants tacrolimus did not change angiogenic factor production or markers of inflammation or oxidative stress.

CONCLUSION

An acute tacrolimus exposure reduced PlGF secretion and impaired angiogenesis in primary endothelial cells, without affecting. These findings provide a potential mechanistic basis for tacrolimus to contribute to the endothelial dysfunction contributing to preeclampsia.

Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy, Vaccination, and Monoclonal Antibody Use With Outcomes in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Study

Background and Aim

Patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation are at an elevated risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) because of post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. However, optimization of vaccination, modification of immunosuppression, and implementation of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in transplant recipients with COVID-19 is uncertain.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent liver or kidney transplants and were diagnosed with COVID-19. The association of several vaccine doses, mycophenolate therapy, and mAB therapy with mortality outcomes after COVID-19 diagnosis (3 and 6 months), hospitalization, and length of hospital stay were assessed.

Results

This study included 255 patients with a median age of 59 (23-89) were included. Many COVID-19 vaccine doses were not associated with any outcome; however, patients with a liver transplanted with mycophenolate had higher 3-month (19% vs. 0%; p = 0.02) and 6-month (21% vs. 0%; p = 0.01) mortality rates than those who did not. In addition, transplant recipients who received mAb therapy for COVID-19 were less likely to be hospitalized (37% vs. 68%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

For organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, vaccination alone may not be an optimal strategy for preventing serious outcomes. Rather, the types of organ transplant, immunosuppressive therapy (particularly mycophenolate), and COVID-19 treatment strategy should be synergistically considered to promote an optimal therapeutic dynamic for a vulnerable population.

Sensitive HLA antibody testing and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure

Solid phase detection and identification of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation currently relies on single antigen bead (Luminex®) assays, which is more sensitive than the previously used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). To evaluate the impact of more sensitive HLA testing on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft survival, we analysed 1818 renal allograft recipients transplanted between March 2004 and May 2021. In 2008, solid phase testing switched from ELISA to Luminex. We included 393 (21.6%) transplantations before and 1425 (78.4%) transplantations after transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based testing. For this study, bio-banked ELISA era samples were tested retrospectively with Luminex. Significantly less pretransplant DSA were found in patients transplanted with pre-existing HLA antibodies in the Luminex (109/387) versus the ELISA period (43/90) (28% vs. 48%, p < 0.01). Throughout histological follow-up, 169 of 1818 (9.3%) patients developed AMR. After implementing Luminex-based testing, the rate of AMR significantly decreased (p = 0.003). However, incidence of graft failure did not significantly differ between both eras. In conclusion, less patients with pretransplant DSA were transplanted since the implementation of Luminex HLA testing. Transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based HLA testing was associated with a significant decrease in AMR occurrence post-transplantation. Since the decline of AMR did not translate into improved graft survival, Luminex-based testing has the added value of preventing low-risk AMR cases. Therefore, Luminex' high sensitivity must be balanced against waiting time for a suitable organ.

Medication non-adherence and its associated factors among kidney transplant patients in a large teaching hospital in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

This study examines medication adherence among kidney transplant patients at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, focusing on the level of adherence and associated factors to immunosuppressant medicines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 270 patients from October 2021 to January 2022 using a structured questionnaire analyzed with SPSS version 26. The prevalence of medication adherence was computed, and a binary logistic regression was fitted to estimate the association. Medication adherence level measurement in post-kidney transplant patients was assessed using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) and Basel Adherence Assessment Scale in Immunosuppressants (BAASIS). A 95% confidence interval and p-value < 0.05 were used for statistical significance.

RESULTS

The study found that 71.5% of kidney transplant patients were male, with a median age of 37 and a mean duration of 3.55 years. Medication adherence in post-kidney transplant patients was 81.9%. Post-transplant duration above 5 years and missing follow-up visits more than two times was associated with a 92.6% and 91.2% in medication non-adherence rate respectively. Additionally, forgetfulness was associated with a 90.6%, non-adherence level compared to drug unavailability and financial reasons.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The study indicates that our patients exhibit higher medication adherence than WHO-measured levels, suggesting the need for healthcare providers to strengthen their intervention, especially for those above 5 years post-kidney transplant. The reason for increased adherence could be explained by the health education program about the medication name, dosing, frequency of ingestion and adverse effects of the drug, and effects of non-adherence.

Protocol for a multicentre prospective exploratory mixed-methods study investigating the modifiable psychosocial variables influencing access to and outcomes after kidney transplantation in children and young people in the UK

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the preferred therapy for children with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD-5). However, there is a wide variation in access to kidney transplantation across the UK for children. This study aims to explore the psychosocial factors that influence access to and outcomes after kidney transplantation in children in the UK using a mixed-methods prospective longitudinal design.

METHODS

Qualitative data will be collected through semistructured interviews with children affected by CKD-5, their carers and paediatric renal multidisciplinary team. Recruitment for interviews will continue till data saturation. These interviews will inform the choice of existing validated questionnaires, which will be distributed to a larger national cohort of children with pretransplant CKD-5 (n=180) and their carers. Follow-up questionnaires will be sent at protocolised time points regardless of whether they receive a kidney transplant or not. Coexisting health data from hospital, UK renal registry and National Health Service Blood and Transplant registry records will be mapped to each questionnaire time point. An integrative analysis of the mixed qualitative and quantitative data will define psychosocial aspects of care for potential intervention to improve transplant access.

ANALYSIS

Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data will be analysed using appropriate statistical methods to understand how these factors influence access to transplantation, as well as the distribution of psychosocial factors pretransplantation and post-transplantation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol has been reviewed by the National Institute for Health Research Academy and approved by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 4 (IRAS number 270493/ref: 20/WA/0285) and the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/SS/0038). Results from this study will be disseminated across media platforms accessed by affected families, presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Outcomes after kidney transplant alone in patients with cirrhosis-A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend kidney transplant alone (KTA) in compensated cirrhosis based on a few small studies, but this is not widely performed despite its potential benefit to patients and the organ supply. Our aim was to determine the outcomes of KTA in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1/2012 to 12/2021, outcomes in KTA recipients with compensated cirrhosis were retrospectively compared to patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) but no cirrhosis. Patients with compensated cirrhosis were also compared to a matched cohort (based on age, time on hemodialysis, sex, and ethnicity) of KTA recipients without CLD. The outcomes included patient survival, allograft failure, allograft rejection, serious infection, liver decompensation, and length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Over 9 years, 1562 KTAs were performed, with 150 (9.6%) patients having CLD mostly due to chronic hepatitis C, and a median follow-up of 3.5 years. 32/150 (21%) had compensated cirrhosis at the time of KTA with a mean MELD-Na of 22 (1.5). Matched controls (n = 189) were identified. We found no differences in patient survival (p = .07), allograft failure (p = .6), allograft rejection (p = .43), rates of serious infection (p = .31), as well as LOS (p = .61) among patients with compensated cirrhosis compared to patients with CLD but no cirrhosis, but with higher rates of liver decompensation (p = .004). Similarly, compared to patients without CLD, patients with cirrhosis had similar rates of patient survival (p = .20), allograft failure (p = .27), allograft rejection (p = .62) and LOS (p = .19) but with higher rates of serious infections (p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the safety and efficacy of KTA in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Benefits of statin therapy within a year after kidney transplantation

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation (KT). Although statins reduce cardiovascular risk and have renal benefits in the general population, their effects on KT recipients are not well-established. We studied the effects of early statin use (within 1-year post-transplantation) on long-term outcomes in 714 KT recipients from the Korean cohort study for outcome in patients with KT. Compared with the control group, statin group recipients were significantly older, had a higher body mass index, and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus. During a median follow-up of 85 months, 74 graft losses occurred (54 death-censored graft losses and 20 deaths). Early statin use was independently associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.280; 95% confidence interval 0.111-0.703) and lower death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio, 0.350; 95% confidence interval 0.198-0.616). Statin therapy significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels but did not decrease the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Biopsy-proven rejection and graft renal function were not significantly different between statin and control groups. Our findings suggest that early statin use is an effective strategy for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and improving patient and graft survival after KT.

Kidney Stone Events after Kidney Transplant in the United States

BACKGROUND

Kidney stone disease is common and can lead to complications such as AKI, urinary tract obstruction, and urosepsis. In kidney transplant recipients, complications from kidney stone events can also lead to rejection and allograft failure. There is limited information on the incidence of kidney stone events in transplant recipients.

METHODS

We identified 83,535 patients from the United States Renal Data System who received their first kidney transplant between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2018. We examined the incidence of kidney stone events and identified risk factors associated with a kidney stone event in the first 3 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

We found 1436 patients (1.7%) who were diagnosed with a kidney stone in the 3 years after kidney transplant. The unadjusted incidence rate for a kidney stone event was 7.8 per 1000 person-years. The median time from transplant to a kidney stone diagnosis was 0.61 (25%-75% range 0.19-1.46) years. Patients with a history of kidney stones were at greatest risk of a kidney stone event after transplant (hazard ratio [HR], 4.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.82 to 5.65). Other notable risk factors included a diagnosis of gout (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.80), hypertension (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.66), and a dialysis of vintage of ≥9 years (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86; ref vintage ≤2.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 2% of kidney transplant recipients were diagnosed with a kidney stone in the 3 years after kidney transplant. Risk factors of a kidney stone event include a history of kidney stones and longer dialysis vintage.

Multimorbidity prevalence and patterns in chronic kidney disease: findings from an observational multicentre UK cohort study

PURPOSE

Multimorbidity [defined as two or more long-term conditions (LTCs)] contributes to increased treatment and medication burden, poor health-related quality of life, and worse outcomes. Management strategies need to be patient centred and tailored depending on existing comorbidities; however, little is known about the prevalence and patterns of comorbidities in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We investigated the prevalence of multimorbidity and comorbidity patterns across all CKD stages.

METHODS

Multimorbidity was assessed, using a composite of self-report and clinical data, across four CKD groups stratified by eGFR [stage 1-2, stage 3a&b, stage 4-5, and kidney transplant (KTx)]. Principal component analysis using varimax rotation was used to identify comorbidity clusters across each group.

RESULTS

Of the 978 participants (mean 66.3 ± 14 years, 60% male), 96.0% had multimorbidity. In addition to CKD, the mean number of comorbidities was 3.0 ± 1.7. Complex multimorbidity (i.e. ≥ 4 multiple LTCs) was identified in 560 (57.3%) participants. When stratified by CKD stage, the two most prevalent comorbidities across all stages were hypertension (> 55%) and musculoskeletal disorders (> 40%). The next most prevalent comorbidity for CKD stages 1-2 was lung conditions and for CKD stages 3 and 4-5 it was heart problems. CKD stages 1-2 showed different comorbidity patterns and clustering compared to other CKD stages.

CONCLUSION

Most people across the spectrum of CKD have multimorbidity. Different patterns of multimorbidity exist at different stages of CKD, and as such, clinicians should consider patient comorbidities to integrate care and provide effective treatment strategies.

Corticosteroids and Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Infected With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Objective

To examine outcomes in organ transplant and nontransplant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the initial 22 months of the pandemic.

Patients and Methods

We used Optum electronic health records to compare outcomes between an adult transplant group and a propensity-matched nontransplant group that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from February 1, 2020, to December 15, 2021. Baseline characteristics, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, inpatient, and 90-day mortality were compared between the transplant and nontransplant groups and among specific transplant recipients. Cox proportional analysis was used to examine hospitalization and mortality by organ transplant, medical therapy, sex, and the period of the pandemic.

Results

We identified 876,959 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, of whom 3548 were organ transplant recipients. The transplant recipients had a higher risk of hospitalization (30.6% vs 25%, respectively; P<.001), greater use of mechanical ventilation (7.8% vs 5.6%, respectively; P<.001), and increased inpatient mortality (6.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; P<.001) compared with the nontransplant patients. The initiation of mechanical ventilation was significantly more frequent in the transplant group. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, the transplant group had a higher risk of hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.59), without a difference in mortality. In the transplant group, lung transplant recipients had the highest inpatient mortality (11.6%).

Conclusion

Among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the transplant recipients were at a higher risk of hospitalization and inpatient mortality; however, mortality was mainly driven by advanced age and comorbidities rather than by transplant status or immunosuppressive medications. Lung transplant recipients had the greatest inpatient and 90-day mortality.

Short-term outcomes of second kidney transplantation compared with those of first transplantation in Japanese patients: a single-center, retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Among patients who undergo kidney transplantation, a subsequent second kidney transplantation (TX2) is often necessary. The TX2 outcomes remain controversial, however, and only limited data are available on clinical outcomes of TX2 in Japanese patients. This study aimed to assess graft and patient survival rates of TX2 and compared these rates with those of first kidney transplantation (TX1) in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Of the 898 kidney transplantations performed between 2010 and 2019 at our institution, 33 were TX2. We performed survival analysis using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis with propensity score matching, specifically inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

Death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TX1 versus TX2 groups were 99.3, 97.9, and 95.0% versus 100, 96.0, and 91.2%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TX1 versus TX2 groups were 99.4, 98.9, and 97.8% versus 100, 100, and 94.4%, respectively. Using the log-rank test, IPTW-weighted Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant differences for TX1 versus TX2 in DCGS (p = 0.535) and OS (p = 0.302). On Cox proportional hazards analysis for TX2 versus TX1, the IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for DCGS was 1.75 (95% CI, 0.28-10.9; p = 0.550) and for OS was 2.71 (95% CI, 0.40-18.55; p = 0.311).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who require TX2, this treatment is an acceptable option based on the short-term outcomes data for DCGS and OS.

Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: still an open problem

In the last two decades, the optimization of organ preservation and surgical techniques, and the personalized immunosuppression have reduced the rate of acute rejections and early post-transplant complications. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and evidence suggest a role of chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in this failure. Solid organ transplant recipients may develop chronic dysfunction/damage and several comorbidities, including post-transplant malignancies. Skin cancers, mostly non-melanoma skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma), are the most common malignancies in Caucasian solid organ transplant recipients. Several factors, together with immunosuppression, may contribute to the susceptibility for skin cancers which, although often treatable, could be associated with a much higher mortality rate than in the general population. The rapid identification and treatment (including reduction of immunosuppression and early surgical treatments) have an important role to avoid an aggressive behavior of these malignancies. Organ transplant recipients with a history of skin cancer should be followed closely for developing new and metastatic lesions. Additionally, patient education on the daily use of sun-protective measures and the recognition of the early signs (self-diagnosis) of coetaneous malignancies are useful preventive measures. Finally, clinicians should make themselves aware of the problem and build, in every clinical follow-up center, collaborative network involving transplant clinicians, dermatologists and surgeons who should work together to easily identify and rapidly treat these complications. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, preventive strategies and treatments of skin cancer in organ transplantation.

Association of Abdominal Arterial Calcification Score with Patients' Survival and Kidney Allograft Function after Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

Abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) is common among candidates for kidney transplant. The aim of this study is to correlate AAC score value with post-kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We modified the coronary calcium score by changing the intake data points and used it to quantitate the AAC. We conducted a retrospective clinical study of all adult patients who were transplanted at our center, between 2010 and 2013, and had abdominal computed tomography scan done before transplantation. Outcomes included mortality, pulse pressure (PP) measured by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system, and kidney allograft function measured by iothalamate clearance.

RESULTS

For each 1000 increase of AAC score value, there is an associated 1.05 increase in the risk of death (95% CI 1.02, 1.08) (p < 0.001). Overall median AAC value for all patients was 1784; Kaplan-Meier curve showed reduced survival of all-cause mortality for patients with AAC score value above median and reduced survival among patients with cardiac related mortality. The iothalamate clearance was lower among patients with total AAC score value above the median. Patients with abnormal PP (< 40 or > 60 mmHg) had an elevated median AAC score value at 4319.3 (IQR 1210.4, 11097.1) compared to patients with normal PP with AAC score value at 595.9 (IQR 9.9, 2959.9) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We showed an association of AAC with patients' survival and kidney allograft function after kidney transplant. The AAC score value could be used as a risk stratification when patients are considered for kidney transplant.

Does utilization of heart machine perfusion for donation after cardiac death transplantation affect outcomes of other abdominal transplanted organs?

INTRODUCTION

Machine perfusion of heart for donation after circulatory death (DCD) is being increasingly utilized. Current protocols for utilizing heart DCD's machine perfusion might prolong donor warm ischemic time for nonheart organs. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of utilizing heart machine perfusion on liver and kidney transplants from the same donor.

METHODS

We analyzed data of DCD donors from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) from January-2020 to September-2021 among two groups: donors with heart machine perfusion (HM) and without heart machine perfusion (NHM). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of liver and kidney transplants between two groups.

RESULTS

Total of 102 liver and 319 kidney transplants were performed using organs from donors with HM. After PS matching, no statistically significant difference was seen in 1-year graft survival (GS) for both liver and kidney transplants between two groups (liver HM 90.6% vs. NHM 90.2%, p = .47; kidney HM 95.2% vs. NHM 92.9%, p = .40). There was no difference in the delayed graft function (DGF) rates in kidney transplantation (KT) (HM 42% vs. NHM 35%, p = .062).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of heart machine perfusion in DCD donors had no significant impact on 1-year outcomes of liver and kidney transplantation.

Rate of Ipsilateral Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Objective: To analyze whether the rate of lower extremity (LE) ischemia is higher on the ipsilateral side after kidney transplantation.

Methods: Our institutional transplant database was retrospectively queried for all patients who received a kidney transplant and underwent subsequent LE revascularization or major limb amputations between January 2004 and July 2020. The one-sample binomial test was used to test whether the LE ipsilateral to the transplanted kidney was at higher risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) complications necessitating intervention (major amputation or revascularization).

Results: There were 1,964 patients who received a kidney transplant during the study period. Of these, 51 patients (3%) had subsequent LE arterial revascularizations or major amputations. The mean age was 58 ± 10 years, and 37 patients (73%) were male. A total of 33 patients had ipsilateral LE vascular interventions (26 major amputations and seven revascularizations) while 18 patients had contralateral vascular interventions (14 major amputations and four revascularizations) (P = 0.049). The average interval between transplantation and subsequent vascular intervention was 52 months for the ipsilateral intervention group and 41 months for the contralateral intervention group (P = 0.33).

Conclusions: In patients who received kidney transplantation and required subsequent LE surgical intervention, we observed an association between the side of transplantation and the risk of future ipsilateral LE arterial insufficiency. Further studies are needed to determine the etiology of this association.

Nutritional Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients after Kidney Transplantation-Pilot Study

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a marker of endothelial damage. Research confirms the association of ADMA with an increased cardiovascular risk (CVR) among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Additionally, increased circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) are associated with pathological cardiac remodeling and vascular alterations. The aim of the study is the analysis of the relationship between ADMA, FGF-23, nutritional, biochemical parameters in healthy subjects and KTRs. 46 KTRs and 23 healthy volunteers at mean age of 50.8 ± 15.4 and 62.5 ± 10.7 years were enrolled. The anthropometric and biochemical parameters such as ADMA, FGF-23, albumin, prealbumin were assessed. Fat tissue mass among KTRs was 30.28 ± 9.73%, lean body mass 64.5 ± 14.8%. Overweight and obesity was presented by 65.2% of recipients. Albumin level was 38.54 ± 3.80 g/L, prealbumin 27.83 ± 7.30 mg/dL and were significantly lower than in the control (p < 0.05). Patients with ADMA > 0.66 µmol/L had a lower concentration of prealbumin, albumin and increased concentration of oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL), high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and FGF-23. FGF-23 was significantly higher in patients with higher hsCRP (p < 0.05). KTRs with elevated ADMA had a longer transplantation vintage, lower eGFR and higher albuminuria. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was associated with higher levels of ADMA and FGF-23. Even in stable KTRs a relationship between inflammatory state, nutritional status, graft function and endothelial dysfunction biomarkers was observed.

Surgical Wound Dehiscence in Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Impact on Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT) but there is not enough evidence of its impact on graft survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all KT patients with SWD in our center from January 2015 to July 2020 was performed. A case-control study was performed and for each case of SWD, 2 controls were selected (2:1). To identify risk factors for SWD, a logistic regression analysis was carried out and a multivariable Cox regression was used to describe risk factors for graft survival.

RESULTS

In our center, 503 KT were performed, and 39 patients presented SWD. They were older (62.1 vs 57.1 years; P = .030), most had diabetes mellitus (59% vs 28.6%; P = .002) and their body mass index was higher (31 vs 26.9 kg/m²; P < .001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (P = .024) and a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² at time of transplantation (P = .018) were predictors of SWD. A higher rate of delayed graft function was described in SWD (P = .013) and it was associated with a longer hospital stay (20.9 vs 15 days; P = .004). Graft survival was lower in patients with SWD (P = .036). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, time in renal replacement therapy (P = .020) and SWD (P = .028) were predictors of shorter graft survival.

CONCLUSION

SWD is a risk factor for graft survival. The presence of diabetes mellitus and a higher body mass index are predictors for the appearance of this complication.

The New UK National Kidney Allocation Scheme With Maximized "R4-D4" Kidney Transplants: Better Patient-to-Graft Longevity Matching May Be at the Cost of More Resources

OBJECTIVES

A new kidney matching scheme for allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation was introduced in the United Kingdom in September 2019. Donors and recipients are stratified into quartiles derived from demographic and retrieval indices associated with risk of adverse outcome. We present data on 2 years of transplants, with the aim of understanding the potential impacts ofthe scheme on patient/transplant outcomes, hospitalization, and resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All deceased donortransplants from 2015 and 2016 were reclassified using the risk quartiles (D1-D4 for donor and R1-R4 for recipient, where 4 is highestrisk). Inpatientlength of stay, kidney function defined by estimated glomerular rate at 1 year, and patient survival data were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 195 deceased donor transplants analyzed, 144 recipients (73.4%) were in the highest risk R4 category, including 55 with R4-D4 combination (28.1%). Recipients in the R4 category had longer index admissions (mean of 12.4 vs 8.1 days for R1-R3; P = .002) and higher subsequent admission rates 90 days posttransplant(185.7 vs 122.7/1000 patient days for R1-R3; P < .001). Kidney transplant function at 1 year was lower for grafts categorized as D4 (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 35.7 vs 54.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for D1-D3; P < .001). However, survival for R4 recipients with D4 kidneys was not significantly differentfrom R4 recipients with D1 to D3 kidneys (4-year patient survival rate with R4-D4 combination was 90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The principles ofthe allocation scheme in matching graft and patient survival were already largely being observed (matching higher risk deceased donor kidneys to higher risk recipients). However, an increase in D4 proportions in the R4 group may be associated with longer hospitalization posttransplant. Consideration should be given to mitigation strategies to address this. Despite poorer graft function, patient survival appears satisfactory.

Nonlinear relationship between body mass index and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation: A dose-response meta-analysis of 50 observational studies

BACKGROUND

Exact dose-response relationship between body mass index at transplantation and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation remained unclear, and no specific body mass index threshold and pretransplant weight loss aim were recommended for kidney transplantation candidates among transplant centers.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature published up to December 31, 2019. The two-stage, random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the dose-response relationship between body mass index and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Ninety-four studies were included for qualitative assessment and 50 for dose-response meta-analyses. There was a U-shaped relationship between graft loss, patient death, and body mass index. Body mass index with the lowest risk of graft loss was 25.2 kg/m², and preferred body mass index range was 22-28 kg/m². Referring to a body mass index of 22 kg/m², the risk of graft loss was 1.088, 0.981, 1.003, and 1.685 for a body mass index of 18, 24, 28, and 40 kg/m², respectively. Body mass index with the lowest risk of patient death was 24.7 kg/m², and preferred body mass index range was 22-27 kg/m². Referring to a body mass index of 22 kg/m², the patient death risk was 1.115, 0.981, 1.032, and 2.634 for a body mass index of 18, 24, 28, and 40 kg/m², respectively. J-shaped relationships were observed between body mass index and acute rejection, delayed graft function, primary graft nonfunction, and de novo diabetes. Pair-wise comparisons showed that higher body mass index was also a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, infection, longer length of hospital stay, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate level.

CONCLUSION

Underweight and severe obesity at transplantation are associated with a significantly increased risk of graft loss and patient death. A target body mass index at kidney transplantation is 22-27 kg/m².

Self-reported poor quality of sleep in solid organ transplant: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

High quality sleep of sufficient duration is vital to overall health and wellbeing. Self-reported poor quality of sleep, sleep reported as irregular in timing, marked by frequent awakenings, or shortened in duration, is common across the solid-organ transplant trajectory.

AIM

This Systematic Review aimed to summarize available literature on rates of self-reported poor quality of sleep among solid organ transplant candidates and recipients.

METHODS

A systematic search of published literature was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINHAL, and PsychInfo databases with no date restrictions. Original articles in the English language describing self-reported quality of sleep using standardized questionnaires in adults either waitlisted for, or who received a solid organ transplant (heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, or multi-solid organ) were included.

RESULTS

Of a potential 2054 articles identified, 44 were included (63.6% renal transplant, 20.5% liver transplant, 11.4% lung transplant, and 4.5% included multiple organ transplant populations), with the majority (68.2%) focusing only on post-transplant populations. No included articles focused solely on heart or pancreas transplant populations. On average, the transplant population with the greatest improvement in quality of sleep (reported as poor sleep quality, insomnia, sleep disturbance, or sleep dissatisfaction) from transplant candidacy to post-transplantation were renal transplant (from 53.5% pre, to 38.9% post) followed by liver transplant patients (from 52.8% pre, to 46.3% post), while lung transplant patients remained similar pre- to post-transplantation (55.6% pre, to 52% post). Poor quality of sleep was frequently associated with anxiety and depression, poorer quality of life, restless legs syndrome, and higher comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports of poor quality of sleep are highly prevalent across all solid-organ transplant populations, both pre- and post-transplantation. Future studies should assess quality of sleep longitudinally throughout all phases of the transplantation trajectory, with more research focusing on how to optimize sleep in solid organ transplant populations.

Peripheral Vascular Disease and Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Rethinking an Important Ongoing Complication

Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is highly prevalent in patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) and after transplantation and is associated with impaired transplant outcomes. Multiple traditional and nontraditional risk factors, as well as uremia- and transplant-related factors, affect 2 processes that can coexist, atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis, leading to PVD. Some pathogenic mechanisms, such as inflammation-related endothelial dysfunction, mineral metabolism disorders, lipid alterations, or diabetic status, may contribute to the development and progression of PVD. Early detection of PVD before and after KT, better understanding of the mechanisms of vascular damage, and application of suitable therapeutic approaches could all minimize the impact of PVD on transplant outcomes. This review focuses on the following issues: (1) definition, epidemiological data, diagnosis, risk factors, and pathogenic mechanisms in KT candidates and recipients; (2) adverse clinical consequences and outcomes; and (3) classical and new therapeutic approaches.

Changes in quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation in the UK ATTOM programme: a longitudinal cohort questionnaire survey with additional qualitative interviews

OBJECTIVE

To examine quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort questionnaire surveys and qualitative semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis with a pragmatic approach.

SETTING

Completion of generic and disease-specific PROMs at two time points, and telephone interviews with participants UK-wide.

PARTICIPANTS

101 incident deceased-donor (DD) and 94 incident living-donor (LD) kidney transplant recipients, together with 165 patients on the waiting list (WL) from 18 UK centres recruited to the Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM) programme completed PROMs at recruitment (November 2011 to March 2013) and 1 year follow-up. Forty-one of the 165 patients on the WL received a DD transplant and 26 received a LD transplant during the study period, completing PROMs initially as patients on the WL, and again 1 year post-transplant. A subsample of 10 LD and 10 DD recipients participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

LD recipients were younger, had more educational qualifications and more often received a transplant before dialysis. Controlling for these and other factors, cross-sectional analyses at 12 months post-transplant suggested better QoL, renal-dependent QoL and treatment satisfaction for LD than DD recipients. Patients on the WL reported worse outcomes compared with both transplant groups. However, longitudinal analyses (controlling for pre-transplant differences) showed that LD and DD recipients reported similarly improved health status and renal-dependent QoL (p<0.01) pre-transplant to post-transplant. Patients on the WL had worsened health status but no change in QoL. Qualitative analyses revealed transplant recipients' expectations influenced their recovery and satisfaction with transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

While cross-sectional analyses suggested LD kidney transplantation leads to better QoL and treatment satisfaction, longitudinal assessment showed similar QoL improvements in PROMs for both transplant groups, with better outcomes than for those still wait-listed. Regardless of transplant type, clinicians need to be aware that managing expectations is important for facilitating patients' adjustment post-transplant.

Metabolic Consequences of Solid Organ Transplantation

Metabolic complications affect over 50% of solid organ transplant recipients. These include posttransplant diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Preexisting metabolic disease is further exacerbated with immunosuppression and posttransplant weight gain. Patients transition from a state of cachexia induced by end-organ disease to a pro-anabolic state after transplant due to weight gain, sedentary lifestyle, and suboptimal dietary habits in the setting of immunosuppression. Specific immunosuppressants have different metabolic effects, although all the foundation/maintenance immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors) increase the risk of metabolic disease. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the emerging knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of these different metabolic complications, and the potential genetic contribution (recipient +/- donor) to these conditions. These metabolic complications impact both graft and patient survival, particularly increasing the risk of cardiovascular and cancer-associated mortality. The current evidence for prevention and therapeutic management of posttransplant metabolic conditions is provided while highlighting gaps for future avenues in translational research.

Cardiac evaluation of the kidney or liver transplant candidate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the field of transplant has advanced, cardiac events have become the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after liver and kidney transplantation ahead of graft failure and infection. This trend has been bolstered by the transplantation of older and sicker patients who have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, accentuating the need to determine which patients should undergo more extensive cardiac evaluation prior to transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Computed tomography coronary angiography with or without coronary artery calcium scoring is now preferred over stress imaging in most transplant candidates for assessment of coronary artery disease. Assessment of cardiac structure and function using transthoracic echocardiography with tissue doppler imaging and strain imaging is recommended, particularly in liver transplant candidates who are at high risk of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, for which new diagnostic criteria were recently published in 2019.

SUMMARY

Cardiac evaluation of liver and kidney transplant candidates requires a global assessment for both short and long-term risk for cardiac events. Imaging of cardiac structure and function using transthoracic echocardiography with tissue doppler imaging and strain imaging is recommended. Risk stratification should consider both the anatomic and functional consequences of coronary artery disease in transplant candidates.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/MOT/A27.

FDG PET/CT for Detection of Infectious Complications Following Solid Organ Transplantation

Infectious complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are often more severe and remain a diagnostic challenge due to vague and atypical clinical presentations. Diagnostic performance of conventional diagnostic tools is frequently inadequate which may lead to delayed diagnosis with the risk of poorer outcomes. This literature review aimed to investigate the current evidence on the use of ¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/computer tomography (CT) in infectious complications after SOT. Based on search in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, 13 articles and 46 case reports were included. For inclusion, articles were to include data on patients with infectious complications after SOT, and where FDG PET/CT was part of the work-up. Final searches were conducted on 02 September 2020. Overall, in the absence of initial diagnostic clues, FDG PET/CT should be considered as the imaging technique of choice as it may guide further investigations and eventually reveal the diagnosis in most of the patients. However, the available literature of the role of FDG PET/CT in SOT recipients with infectious complications is scarce and well-designed prospective studies including control groups are warranted to establish the role of FDG PET/C/ in SOT recipients. The main drawback of FDG PET/CT is the lack of ability to differentiate between cancer and infectious diseases which are both highly prevalent in this patient group. Accordingly, the main reasons for "false" results of FDG PET/CT is the misdiagnosis of cancer in benign inflammatory or infectious processes, information which nonetheless can be useful.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Screening for Iliac Arterial Calcification in Kidney Transplant Candidates

Background

Peripheral vascular disease and iliac arterial calcification are prevalent in kidney transplant candidates and jeopardize graft outcomes. We report our experience with computed tomography (CT) screening for iliac arterial calcification.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 493 renal transplant candidates from protocol initiation in 2014. Non-contrast CT was performed or retrospectively reviewed if any of the following criteria were present: diabetes, ESRD >6 years, 25 pack-years of smoking or current smoker, diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, parathyroidectomy, and coronary artery disease intervention. Differences in evaluation and transplant outcomes between groups were compared with chi-squared analysis. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictive criteria for presence of iliac arterial calcification.

Results

Of 493 candidates evaluated, CTs were reviewed in 346 (70.2%). Iliac arterial calcification was identified in 119 screened candidates (34.4%). Of candidates with iliac arterial calcification identified on CT, 16 (13.4%) were excluded for CT findings, and 9 (7.6%) had their surgical management plan changed. Overall, 91 (76.5%) candidates with iliac arterial calcification on CT were approved, compared to 203 (89.4%) without calcification (P<0.001). The percentage of screened patients with iliac arterial calcification on CT increased with increasing age (P<0.0005). Age and diabetes mellitus were predictive of calcification.

Conclusions

Many kidney transplant candidates are at risk for iliac arterial calcification, although such calcification does not prevent transplantation for most candidates who have it. Algorithmic pre-operative screening has clinical value in determining transplant candidacy and potentially improving postoperative outcomes in patients requiring kidney transplantation.