Factors Associated With Residual Kidney Function and Proteinuria After Living Kidney Donation in the United States

Renal outcome of living kidney donors aged more than 70 years

BACKGROUND

The number of marginal living kidney donors has increased. Medically complex donors who have hypertension, older age, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been more likely to be used.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors at a single center. We analyzed 309 living donors and divided them into three groups: group with older donors (aged ≥70 years) (n = 41), middle-aged (aged 46-69 years) (n = 239), and young donors (aged <46 years) (N = 29). Donor factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b or worse within 5 years post-donation were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 309 live donors, 86 (27.8%) developed CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation. The incidence of CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation was significantly higher in older donor (p < 0.01). Cox regression models revealed that older donor ages and lower eGFR were significantly related to the development of CKD stage3b or worse, independent of comorbidities such as obesity and hypertension [hazard ratio (95% CI); 4.59 (1.02-20.6), p = 047, 0.95 (0.94-0.96), p ≤ 0.01, respectively]. However, recovery of eGFR 4-5 years after donation was noted in the middle-aged and older donor groups, whereas the level of eGFR remained unchanged in the young group.

CONCLUSIONS

Older donors tend to develop CKD stage3b within 5 years post-donation but with the potential of recovery. Healthy older people (aged ≥70 years) could be candidates for living donors under careful monitoring of kidney function after donation.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Examining post-donation outcomes in Hispanic/Latinx living kidney donors in the United States: A systematic review

We conducted a systematic review to assess outcomes in Hispanic donors and explore how Hispanic ethnicity was characterized. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus through October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened study titles, abstracts, and full texts; they also qualitatively synthesized results and independently assessed quality of included studies. Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Study sample sizes ranged from 4007 to 143,750 donors and mean age ranged from 37 to 54 years. Maximum follow-up time of studies varied from a perioperative donor nephrectomy period to 30 years post-donation. Hispanic donors ranged between 6% and 21% of the donor populations across studies. Most studies reported Hispanic ethnicity under race or a combined race and ethnicity category. Compared to non-Hispanic White donors, Hispanic donors were not at increased risk for post-donation mortality, end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, non-pregnancy-related hospitalizations, or overall perioperative surgical complications. Compared to non-Hispanic White donors, most studies showed Hispanic donors were at higher risk for diabetes mellitus following nephrectomy; however, mixed findings were seen regarding the risk for post-donation chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Future studies should evaluate cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic differences within the heterogeneous Hispanic donor population, which may further explain variation in health outcomes.

Assessing Renal Function for Kidney Donation. How Low Is Too Low?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with decreased morbi-mortality, improved life quality, and reduced cost. However, the shortage of organs from deceased donors led to an increase in KT from living donors. Some stipulate that living donors have a higher risk of ESKD after donation compared with healthy non-donors. The reason for this is not clear. It is possible that ESKD is due to the nephrectomy-related reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), followed by an age-related decline that may be more rapid in related donors. It is essential to assess donors properly to avoid rejecting suitable ones and not accepting those with a higher risk of ESKD. GFR is a central aspect of the evaluation of potential donors since there is an association between low GFR and ESKD. The methods for assessing GFR are in continuous debate, and the kidney function thresholds for accepting a donor may vary according to the guidelines. While direct measurements of GFR (mGFR) provide the most accurate evaluation of kidney function, guidelines do not systematically use this measurement as a reference. Also, some studies have shown that the GFR decreases with age and may vary with gender and race, therefore, the lower limit of GFR in patients eligible to donate may vary based on these demographic factors. Finally, it is known that CrCl overestimates mGFR while eGFR underestimates it, therefore, another way to have a reliable GFR could be the combination of two measurement methods.

Is Compensation Prediction Score Valid for Contralateral Kidney After Living-Donor Nephrectomy in the United States?

BACKGROUND

Compensation after living donor nephrectomy is well known, and a compensation prediction score (CPS) was made in Japan previously. The aim of this study was to perform external validation of CPS in the United States.

METHODS

We studied retrospectively 78 living donor nephrectomies in our institution. We defined a favorable compensation as a postdonation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year of >60% of the predonation eGFR. We analyzed the living donors' clinical characteristics and outcomes and validated CPS score.

RESULTS

The median (range) donor age was 43 (21-63) years, and median body mass index was 26.9 (18.3-35.9) kg/m². Forty-four percent of donors were White. The donor predonation eGFR was 105 (61-134) mL/min/1.73 m², and the postdonation eGFR at 1 year was 73.2 (0-115) mL/min/1.73 m². Eighty-three percent of donors had a favorable compensation. The CPS was 9.6 (1.6-15.6) and showed strong diagnostic accuracy for predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve, 0.788; 95% confidence interval, 0.652-0.924; P = .001). The CPS showed a significant positive correlation with the postdonation eGFR at 1 year (R = 0.54; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, the CPS would be a valid tool with which to predict a favorable compensation of remnant kidney function.