Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: Early Outcomes and Complications of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors

Uterus transplantation: A bibliometric review of six-decade study from 1960 to 2024

INTRODUCTION

Some women are unable to become pregnant because they do not have a functional uterus. Over the last decade, it has become possible for these women to get pregnant through uterus transplantation, which has been the subject of numerous research studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review published articles in the uterus transplantation area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional bibliometric review to study the 100 highly cited papers in the Web of Science and Scopus databases from 1960 to 2024. Our research applied bibliometric analysis to these top 100 highly cited papers. Document citation and co-occurrence analysis were used for the data study. VOSviewer along with Bibliometrix® software was used to design the maps.

RESULTS

The trend of uterus transplantation publications increased exponentially after 2010. Sweden is the leading country, followed by the USA and Spain. Fertility and Sterility, Lancet, American Journal of Transplantation, and Human Reproduction were the highly cited journals. Collaboration among countries showed that the most collaboration took place between Sweden and Spain (18), Sweden and the USA (14), the USA and Spain (8), Sweden and Australia (6), and the USA and the United Kingdom (6). Furthermore, the results found that more than one-third of the highly cited papers were review papers (39%) and 27% were clinical trial studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This bibliometric review provides a valuable contribution to the literature on uterine transplantation by synthesizing and analyzing existing research findings. It offers insights into current trends, key themes, geographic distribution, and potential areas for future research within this rapidly evolving field.

Robotic Living Donor Hysterectomy for Uterus Transplantation: An Update on Donor and Recipient Outcomes

Background/Objectives: Uterus transplantation (UTx) has evolved into a clinical reality for women with absolute uterine infertility. The international experience with UTx has predominantly utilized living donor grafts-and strategies to minimize harm to donors remain paramount. Robotic living donor hysterectomy represents a minimally invasive approach to facilitate rapid donor recovery, improve pelvic visualization and operative access, and maintain UTx recipient outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe donor, recipient, graft, and pregnancy outcomes after adoption of a robotic living donor hysterectomy program. Methods: The Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS) incorporated a robotic living donor hysterectomy operative protocol, including transvaginal extraction, from April 2019. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, and a case series presented, to describe donor intra- and post-operative outcomes and recipient intra-operative outcomes, graft viability, established pregnancies, and live births. Early cases were compared to later cases to better describe the learning curve associated with the technique. Results: Sixteen robotic living donor hysterectomies were performed with 100% graft viability after implantation demonstrated by myometrial flow and onset of menses. Early experience (eight cases) demonstrated two cases of ureteric injury. Later experience (eight cases) demonstrated a reduction in operative time (11 h 10 min vs. 6 h 38 min), with no ureteric injuries and a reduction in major operative morbidity from 25% to 12.5% (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3). At the time of reporting, nine successful live births have occurred, with six ongoing pregnancies. Conclusions: Robotic living donor hysterectomy represents a safe approach to minimize donor harm without compromising UTx recipient, graft, and pregnancy-related outcomes. A learning curve is demonstrated with the adoption of the novel technique-with particularly care required to prevent ureteric injuries, and ongoing vigilance and reporting necessary given the small case numbers of robotic living donor hysterectomy reported internationally.

Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Clinical Review

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is currently the only available treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. More than 90 uterus transplantations have been performed worldwide, mostly from living donors. Living-donor (LD) UTx is a challenging surgical procedure since it poses ethical issues, and it is a high-risk and invasive surgery with higher hysterectomy-related risks compared to conventional hysterectomy. A total of 59 living-donor hysterectomies have been reported in the literature, including 35 performed with a laparotomic approach, 20 with a robotic approach and 4 with a laparoscopic approach. The mean donor age was 45.6 ± 9.1 years, and 22 were unrelated with the recipients, 34 were emotionally related (27 mothers, 5 sisters, 2 mother's sisters). The mean recipient age was 28.8 ± 4.5 years. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome was the most common indication for uterus transplant. Robotic living-donor hysterectomy had the longest operative time but resulted in a lower blood loss and postoperative stay compared to laparotomic and laparoscopic approaches. Twenty-nine births from LD-UTx have been reported, four after robotic living-donor hysterectomy and twenty-five after a laparotomic procedure. UTx is now an effective treatment for women with UFI. While living-donor UTx in some cases may be considered an experimental procedure, it offers the extraordinary possibility to give women the opportunity to have a pregnancy. Many efforts should be made to reduce the potential risks for donors, including the use of mini-invasive techniques, and the efficacy of UTx in the recipients, giving the potential harm of immunosuppression in a recipient of a non-life-saving organ.

Unique risk factors for unplanned preterm delivery in the uterus transplant recipient

STUDY QUESTION

Do characteristics of the lower uterine segment and cervix modify the risk of preterm delivery in uterus transplant (UTx) recipients?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The cervical length showed little association with preterm delivery, however, cervical inflammation deserves further exploration as a cause of preterm delivery.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

UTx recipients do not have the risk factors normally used to stratify pregnancies that would benefit from cervical length assessment. In addition, unique factors related to absent tissues, a different blood supply, inflammatory processes of rejection, cervical biopsies, and a different microbiome challenge the normal progressive remodeling of the cervix and thus cervical competence.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a subanalysis of a clinical trial of 20 women undergoing uterus transplantation at Baylor University Medical Center from 2016 to 2020, in addition to two women who received transplantation outside of a research protocol at our institution through September 2022. In this report, the first 16 UTx recipients that achieved live birth are included.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The focus of this study was 20 pregnancies that reached the second trimester in 16 women following UTx. We analyzed recipient, transplant, and donor factors to determine if characteristics were associated with delivery outcome. We compared obstetrical outcomes, including planned versus unplanned delivery, by factors such as number of superior venous anastomoses, warm ischemia and cold ischemia times, donor factors including cesarean sections, cervical biopsy results, and cervical ultrasound results.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Planned term deliveries occurred in 44% (8/18) of live births. Of the preterm births, 30% (3/10) were planned and 70% (7/10) were unplanned. Unplanned deliveries occurred in women with spontaneous preterm labor, severe rejection, subchorionic hematoma, and placenta previa. Cervical length in UTx recipients averaged 33.5 mm at 24 weeks and 31.5 mm at 28 weeks, comparable to values from the general population. No relationship was seen between delivery outcome and number of veins used, ischemic time, or number of previous cesarean sections.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study's small size allows limited conclusions. The obstetric history of all donors was limited to mode of delivery.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Cervical length measurements in the UTx population are not expected to deviate from those with a native uterus. While cervical length surveillance remains important, attention must be paid to the results of cervical biopsies which are obtained to monitor rejection. Inflammatory processes seem most predictive of preterm delivery.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was provided for this study. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02656550.

Psychosocial Outcomes in Nondirected Uterus Donors 1 Y After Donation

BACKGROUND

As uterus transplantation transitions to a clinical procedure for women with absolute uterine-factor infertility, transplant centers performing uterus transplantation need information about the experience of living donors. This study examined the psychosocial impact on 17 nondirected uterus donors in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study 1 y following donation.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted to measure psychosocial outcomes of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, quality of life, and resilience [measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale or Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5, health-related quality of life Short Form-36, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10-Item, respectively) assessed at baseline, at 6-mo and 1-y follow-up. Differences among baseline, 6-mo, and 1-y postdonation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 38.0 y, 16 were married, 15 were of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Most donors did not report psychosocial distress; however, 1 donor reported decline on the role limitations because of Emotional Problems Scale and also showed an increase in depression symptoms at the 6 mo, but at 1 y was below the clinical cutoff for depression. A second donor showed modest decline in emotional well-being. Improvements were seen in other donors on the Physical Functioning Scale and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most nondirected donors appeared to remain stable, both positive and negative changes were observed over the first year. Larger studies are needed to determine psychosocial risks and benefit and what additional resources might be needed to ensure optimal psychosocial outcomes.

Gender-affirming hysterectomy in the United States: A comparative outcomes analysis and potential implications for uterine transplantation

PURPOSE

Hysterectomy is a gynecological procedure sometimes performed as part of the gender-affirming process for transgender and gender-expansive patients assigned female at birth. Our goal was to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing gender-affirming hysterectomy and patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders. We then explored the implications of gender-affirming hysterectomy for uterine transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2009 through 2018. We identified patients undergoing hysterectomy in the United States based on Current Procedural Terminology code. We used the International Classification of Diseases 9 or 10 codes to identify patients with benign menstrual disorders (non-gender-affirming group) and gender dysphoria (gender-affirming group). We compared patient characteristics and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Of the 40,742 patients that met inclusion criteria, 526 (1.3%) patients were individuals with gender dysphoria. Compared to patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders, gender-affirming patients were younger, were healthier, had a lower prevalence of diabetes, and were more likely to undergo surgery in the outpatient setting, with shorter time to discharge. Complication rates were similar between groups. Logistic regression controlling for the American Society of Anesthesiology classification determined the difference of return to the operating room was not statistically significant (OR 1.082; 95% CI, 0.56-2.10; p = 0.816).

CONCLUSION

Gender-affirming hysterectomy has a safety profile similar to hysterectomy performed for benign menstrual disorders. Researchers should further explore the possibility of uterus donation among these patients as they may be suitable candidates.

Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future

Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.

[Uterine transplantation, ethical and social aspects]

Uterine transplantation is now a possible treatment for absolute uterine infertility. It is currently proposed to women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome but indications will likely to expand in the upcoming years. Despite the progressive standardization of the surgical technique and the reduction in perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients, the number of transplants performed worldwide remains very low compared to the number of women potentially in need. This is partly due to the singularity of uterine transplantation: the uterus is not a vital organ since one can live without a uterus. It is a temporary transplantation that is not performed to extend life but to improve its quality, responding above all to a desire to conceive and bear a child. Beyond the strictly technical aspect, these particularities raise many ethical questions, both on an individual and social level, which should make us question the real place uterine transplantation should take in our society. Answering these questions will allow us to provide better guidance for future eligible couples and to anticipate ethical problems on the long run.

Uterus Transplantation as a Surgical Innovation

Uterus transplantation (UTx) research has been introduced in several countries, with trials in Sweden and the United States producing successful outcomes. The growing interest in developing UTx trials in other countries, such as Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia, raises important questions regarding the ethics of surgical innovation research in the field of UTx. This paper examines the current state of UTx in the context of the surgical innovation paradigm and IDEAL framework and discusses the ethical challenges faced by those considering the introduction of new trials. We argue that UTx remains an experimental procedure at a relatively early stage of the IDEAL framework, especially in the context of de novo trials, where protocols are likely to deviate from those used previously and where researchers are likely to have limited experience of UTx. We conclude that countries considering the introduction of UTx trials should build on the strengths of the reported outcomes to consolidate the evidence base and shed light on the uncertainties of the procedure. Authorities responsible for the ethical governance of UTx trials are advised to draw on the ethical framework used in the oversight of surgical innovation.

Graft Failure after Uterus Transplantation in 16 Recipients: A Review

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is now an alternative to surrogacy and adoption for women with uterine factor infertility to have children; however, there are still unresolved clinical and technical issues. One of these is that the graft failure rate after transplantation is somewhat higher than that of other life-saving organ transplants, which is a critical concern. Herein, we summarize the details of 16 graft failures after UTx with living or deceased donors using the published literature in order to learn from these negative outcomes. To date, the main causes of graft failure are vascular factors (arterial and/or venous thrombosis, atherosclerosis, and poor perfusion). Many recipients with thrombosis develop graft failure within one month of surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to devise a safe and stable surgical technique with higher success rates for further development in the UTx field.

Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement

Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transplants (e.g., kidney) in that both living donors (LDs) and deceased donors (DDs) can be utilized for organ procurement. While many endpoints appear to be similar for LD and DD transplants (including graft survival, time to menses, livebirth rates), there are key medical, technical, ethical, and logistical differences between these modalities. Primary considerations in favor of a LD model include thorough screening of donors, enhanced logistics, and greater donor availability. The primary consideration in favor of a DD model is the lack of physical or psychological harm to a living donor. Other important factors, that may not clearly favor one approach over the other, are important to include in discussions of LD vs. DD models. We favor a stepwise approach to uterus transplantation, one in which programs first begin with DD procurement before attempting LD procurement to maximize successful organ recovery and to minimize potential harms to a living donor.

The First 5 Years of Uterus Transplant in the US

Importance

Uterus transplant is a viable surgical treatment for women affected by absolute uterine-factor infertility, which affects 1 in 500 women.

Objective

To review transplant and birth outcomes of uterus transplant recipients in the US since the first case in 2016.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, 5 years of uterus transplant outcome data were collected from the 3 centers performing uterus transplants in the US: Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. A total of 33 women with absolute uterine-factor infertility who underwent uterus transplant between February 2016 and September 2021 were included.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Graft survival, live birth, and neonatal outcome.

Results

Of the 33 included uterus transplant recipients, 2 (6%) were Asian, 1 (3%) was Black, 1 (3%) was South Asian, and 29 (88%) were White; the mean (SD) age was 31 (4.7) years; and the mean (SD) body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 24 (3.6). Most uterus transplant recipients (31 of 33 [94%]) had a congenitally absent uterus (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome), and 21 of 33 (64%) received organs from living donors. Mean (range) follow-up was 36 (1-67) months. There was no donor or recipient mortality. One-year graft survival was 74% (23 of 31 recipients). Through October 2021, 19 of 33 recipients (58%) had delivered 21 live-born children. Among recipients with a viable graft at 1 year, the proportion with a live-born child was 83% (19 of 23). The median (range) gestational age at birth of neonates was 36 weeks 6 days (30 weeks, 1 day to 38 weeks), and the median (range) birth weight was 2860 (1310-3940) g (median [range], 58th [6th-98th] percentile). No congenital malformations were detected.

Conclusions and Relevance

Uterus transplant is a surgical therapy that enables women with uterine-factor infertility to successfully gestate and deliver children. Aggregate data from US centers demonstrate safety for the recipient, living donor, and child. These data may be used to counsel women with uterine-factor infertility on treatment options.

Relationship between uterine veins, ureter and hypogastric nerves for uterine transplantation: an anatomic study

BACKGROUND

Uterine transplantation is on the rise worldwide. In contrast to its arterial anatomy, venous drainage of the uterus is poorly defined in the literature. Our aim was to provide a standardized description of uterine veins through a multimodal approach to establish anatomical landmarks for the uterine transplantation surgeon.

METHODS

Data were obtained from: (1) an anatomical study of eight fresh female cadavers (16 hemipelves) studied separately by an extrafascial dissection from the iliac bifurcation to the uterine pedicle, with analysis of the urinary tract and nerve structures; and (2) a virtual anatomical study from the Anatomage® Table comprising a high-fidelity virtual reconstruction of two deceased female subjects by imaging and anatomical methods.

RESULTS

An inconstant duality of uterine veins was identified: a deep uterine vein of larger caliber, and a superficial uterine vein observed in 25% of cases. A close relationship of the ureter passing posterior to the superficial uterine vein and anterior to the deep uterine vein was evident in the parametrium. The inferior hypogastric plexus was identified in all cases immediately behind the deep uterine vein. The data obtained from the fresh female cadavers were validated by the Anatomage® Table.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the close relationship of the uterine veins with the ureter and the inferior hypogastric plexus. This knowledge represents a surgical landmark to support the success of uterine transplantation by respecting both the graft and the safety of the living donor by limiting the risk of injuries during uterus procurement. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Technological Advancements in Uterus Transplantation

Uterus transplantation is barely a decade old and in a young, evolving field it is hard to identify "technological advances" since it is, in of itself, a technological advance. Nonetheless, one can still identify advances in diagnostic imaging that have improved donor screening to avoid graft losses, highlight the adoption of robotic surgery to make the living donor uterus procurement more minimally invasive, and look to a future of biotechnology like perfusion pumps and bioengineering such as synthetic uterus to increase donor supply. Additional technologies are on the horizon and promise to shape the field further.

The Ethical Evolution of Uterus Transplantation From Concept to Clinical Procedure

Uterus transplantation (UTx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility a path to motherhood that enables them to carry their own pregnancy. Debates about the ethics of UTx have evolved in tandem with its clinical evolution: clinical trials have provided evidence regarding risks and benefits to donors and recipients that were initially uncertain; technical advances have altered the balance between risks and benefits; and the experiences of donors and recipients has revealed questions that were not anticipated. As UTx transitions to a clinical procedure, questions remain about long-term risks and benefits, applications beyond carrying a pregnancy, and cost and access.

The journey from infertility to uterus transplantation: A qualitative study of the perspectives of participants in the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess how absolute uterine factor infertility affects women who undergo uterus transplantation, how uterus transplantation impacts women with absolute uterine factor infertility and how uterus transplant recipients view uterus transplantation in terms of their reproductive autonomy.

DESIGN

Qualitative semi-structured interview study.

SETTING

Uterus transplant programme in a large academic medical centre in the USA.

POPULATION/SAMPLE

Twenty one uterus transplant recipients.

METHODS

A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient demographic information and clinical outcomes. Semi-structured interviews collected information regarding participants' experience.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The outcomes of interest were participants' experience of infertility, experience with uterus transplantation and general perceptions of uterus transplantation.

RESULTS

Six participants were pregnant (one with a second child), six had experienced early graft failure and removal, five had delivered a healthy baby, and four had a viable graft and were awaiting embryo transfer. The primary themes identified were: the negative impact of absolute uterine factor infertility diagnosis on psychological wellbeing, relationships and female identity; the positive impact of uterus transplantation on healing the emotional scars of absolute uterine factor infertility, female identity and value of research trial participation and the perception of uterus transplantation as an expansion of reproductive autonomy. All participants reported that uterus transplantation was worthwhile, regardless of individual outcome.

CONCLUSION

Absolute uterine factor infertility has a negative impact on women from a young age, affects multiple relationships and challenges female identity. Uterus transplantation helps to reverse this impact, transforming women's life narrative of infertility and enhancing female identity.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) adversely affects women. Uterus transplantation helps mitigate the negative impact of AUFI, by transforming women's life narratives of infertility and enhancing female identity.

Uterus transplantation: ethical considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterus transplantation (Utx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility the opportunity to carry their own pregnancies. As Utx transitions from an experimental to standard clinical procedure, we review the status of the ethical issues applicable to the stakeholders involved.

RECENT FINDINGS

With more than 65 Utx procedures reported to date, evidence is accruing that enables the chance of success - a live birth - for the recipient to be weighed against the risks the recipient incurs through the Utx process, as well as risks to living donors undergoing surgery, to children exposed in utero to immunosuppressants and the uterine graft environment, and to third parties related to uterus procurement from multiorgan deceased donors. Experience has also informed aspects of recipient and donor autonomy that must be safeguarded.

SUMMARY

Clinical trial results provides a basis for weighing the interests of the stakeholders implicated in Utx, and so can inform transplant centers' and regulatory bodies' development of policies and protocols that will determine access to Utx and allocation of organs, together with other considerations of justice. Additional evidence, particularly on long-term outcomes, is needed, and new questions can be expected to arise as access to and indications for Utx broaden.

Robotic live donor hysterectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in narrow space. This review covers the development and benefits of robotics and the published robotic donor hysterectomy experiences.

RECENT FINDINGS

Robotic donor hysterectomy publications are scarce with eight cases in Sweden, five in USA, and one each in China and Spain. Robotics have been performed for either the entire donor hysterectomy or with conversion to laparotomy for the last steps of the surgical procedure. The total operative times are in line with open surgery, although a decrease is expected in the future. The estimated blood loss and hospital stays are less than at open surgery. The complication panorama includes hydronephrosis, ureteric fistula and pressure alopecia. Live births with healthy babies have been reported.

SUMMARY

In uterus transplantation, robotic live donor hysterectomy has proven to be feasible, safe and associated with successful live births. The robotic donor hysterectomy is a low-volume procedure and an international registry to gather collective information is crucial for further evaluation and development.

Evolution and Transformation of Uterine Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Uterine transplantation (UTx) is acknowledged to be on the second (2A) of five steps of development in accordance with the staging system for the evaluation of surgical innovations. Accordingly, we aimed to systematically review the available evidence of the surgical techniques and outcomes of UTx in terms of graft survival.

METHODS

 A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed Medline, Cochrane-EBMR, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through November 2020.

RESULTS

 Forty studies, reporting 64 recipients and 64 donors, satisfied inclusion criteria. The surgical time and the estimated blood loss were 515 minutes and 679 mL for graft procurement via laparotomy, 210 minutes and 100 mL for laparoscopic-assisted graft harvest, and 660 minutes and 173 mL for robotic-assisted procedures, respectively. Urinary tract infections (n = 8) and injury to the urinary system (n = 6) were the most common donor complications. Using the donor's internal iliac system, two arterial anastomoses were performed in all cases. Venous outflow was accomplished through the uterine veins (UVs) in 13 cases, a combination of the UVs and the ovarian/uteroovarian veins (OVs/UOVs) in 36 cases, and solely through the OVs/UOVs in 13 cases. Ischemia time was 161 and 258 minutes when using living donors (LD) and deceased donors (DD), respectively. Forty-eight uteri were successfully transplanted or fulfilled the purpose of transplantation, 41 from LDs and 7 from DDs. Twenty-five and four live childbirths from LDs and DDs have been reported, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 UTx is still experimental. Further series are required to recommend specific surgical techniques that best yield a successful transplant and reduce complications for donors and recipients.

Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of uterus transplantation in 2021, including a discussion of pregnancy outcomes of all reported births to date, the donor and recipient selection process, the organ procurement and transplant surgeries, reported complications, postoperative monitoring, preimplantation preparation, and ethical considerations.

METHODS

Literature review and expert commentary.

RESULTS

Reports of thirty-one live births following uterus transplantation have been published from both living and deceased donors. The proper selection of donors and recipients is a labor-intensive process that requires advanced planning. A multidisciplinary team is critical. Reported complications in the recipient include thrombosis, infection, vaginal stricture, antenatal complications, and graft failure. Graft rejection is a common occurrence but rarely leads to graft removal. While most embryo transfers are successful, recurrent implantation failures in uterus transplant patients have been reported. Rates of preterm delivery are high but appear to be declining; more data, including long-term outcome data, is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Uterus transplantation is an emerging therapy for absolute uterine factor infertility, a condition previously without direct treatment options. It is paramount that reproductive health care providers are familiar with the uterus transplantation process as more patients seek and receive this treatment.

Uterus transplantation-questions and answers about the procedure that is expanding the field of solid organ transplantation

Uterus transplant is a new and rapidly evolving field of solid organ transplantation designed to help women with absolute uterine-factor infertility who desire to carry their own pregnancies. The advent of this procedure and human clinical trials of uterus transplantation have raised technical, clinical, and ethical questions. We address several questions about uterus transplantation based on available literature and the clinical experience at Baylor University Medical Center, which has the largest uterus transplant program in the United States.

Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of uterus transplantation in 2021, including a discussion of pregnancy outcomes of all reported births to date, the donor and recipient selection process, the organ procurement and transplant surgeries, reported complications, postoperative monitoring, preimplantation preparation, and ethical considerations.

METHODS

Literature review and expert commentary.

RESULTS

Reports of thirty-one live births following uterus transplantation have been published from both living and deceased donors. The proper selection of donors and recipients is a labor-intensive process that requires advanced planning. A multidisciplinary team is critical. Reported complications in the recipient include thrombosis, infection, vaginal stricture, antenatal complications, and graft failure. Graft rejection is a common occurrence but rarely leads to graft removal. While most embryo transfers are successful, recurrent implantation failures in uterus transplant patients have been reported. Rates of preterm delivery are high but appear to be declining; more data, including long-term outcome data, is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Uterus transplantation is an emerging therapy for absolute uterine factor infertility, a condition previously without direct treatment options. It is paramount that reproductive health care providers are familiar with the uterus transplantation process as more patients seek and receive this treatment.

Analysis of blood parameters and molecular endometrial markers during early reperfusion in two ovine models of uterus transplantation

The dissection of the veins is the trickiest step of Uterine transplantation (UTx). Performing the anastomosis of a single uterine vein could bring a therapeutic benefit and simplification of surgery and serve for managing unilateral venous thromboses. The objectives of this project were to evaluate the expression of early markers of ischemia-reperfusion and to compare findings following one or two vein anastomoses. Orthotopic uterine auto-transplantations were performed on an ovine model with anastomosis of either two (group 1) or one utero-ovarian veins (group 2). Blood gases, histology and ischemia- reperfusion markers transcripts (PTGS2, IL6, IL8, SOD2, C3, BAX/BCL2 and TLR4) were analyzed as well as PTGS2 protein expression using Western Blot and fluorescence immunolocalization on endometrial biopsies after 3h of reperfusion. Ten ewes were included in the experimentation, 4 were in group1, 3 in group 2, the others being sham operated controls. No significant differences were observed between the two phenotypes. Based on these results, the anastomosis of one single uterine vein appears to be an approach consistent with short-term graft survival. Further experiments will be needed to confirm the reliability of this approach, especially the long-term follow-up of the uterine graft including its ability to support gestation to term.

A New Approach for Treatment of Woman With Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility: A Traditional Review of Safety and Efficacy Outcomes in the First 65 Recipients of Uterus Transplantation

Uterine transplantation restores fertility in women with absolute uterine factor infertility and allows the opportunity to conceive, experience gestation, and acquire motherhood. The number of cases being performed is increasing dramatically, with detailed outcomes from 65 cases now available. Pregnancies achieved through uterus transplantation and following in vitro fertilization (IVF) are associated with an increased risk for further mother and newborn babies. This traditional review is focused on the safety and efficacy features of the treatment. However, it is associated with significant risk, with approximately one-quarter of grafts are removed because of complications. Uterine transplantation is realizable in women with uterine factor infertility but is associated with a significant complication risk. The risk of the procedure and gestational and delivery complications deserve important consideration before receiving such treatments. Nevertheless, these observations are preliminary and should be revised after a larger series of data are published. 

Operative and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Living-Donor Surgery on Uterus Transplantation: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach and choice of drainage veins for uterus transplantation living-donor surgery have been investigated to reduce invasiveness.

METHODS

A thorough search of the PubMed database was conducted. The search was not limited by language or date of publication. The data were collected on 13 October 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed each article and determined eligibility for inclusion in the review article. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed articles reporting surgical information or postoperative course, articles regarding animal research on UTx, UTx on deceased donors, or not original articles.

RESULTS

Of the 51 operations within 26 articles reviewed, the mean operative time was shortest in the laparoscopic approach, and longest in the robot-assisted approach. The mean blood loss was less in the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches than in the open approach. In cases where the uterine veins were not preserved, the mean operative time was shortened by each approach and the mean blood loss decreased with the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

These procedures may contribute to less invasive living-donor surgery.

Uterine Transplantation: Evolving Data, Success, and Clinical Importance

Uterine transplantation is an evolving procedure to allow for childbearing in paitents with absolute uterine factor infertility. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature using a comprehensive PubMed literature search. A systematic medical subheadings search strategy was used with the terms "uterus transplant" and "uterine transplantation". Of the 75 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 68 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis on living donor uterine transplant, 5 on deceased donor uterine transplant, and 6 case reports of single uterine transplants. In conclusion, uterus transplant is a nascent field undergoing a rapid rate of evolution as programs mature their data and increase the number of procedures performed. The most recent publications and advances are thus summarized in this article to capture the most up-to-date information.

Uterus Transplantation with Live Donors: Screening Candidates in One French Center

We report our experience regarding the profile and screening process of potential recipients (R) and their live donors (D) in our Uterus transplantation (UTx) trial from 2014 to 2020. The initial screening was performed using medical questionnaires and consultations. The second step of the screening consisted of two individual interviews with an independent multidisciplinary committee. Then, a complete medical, biological and imaging assessment of the directed living D, the R, and her partner was performed over a two-day hospitalization. A total of 239 women contacted our department: 165 potentials R and 74 potentials D. During the first step of screening, 141 R and 45 D were excluded. Only 12 R/D pairs were pursued. During inclusion, 10 R/D pairs were excluded. One R/D pair is still under evaluation. Finally, only 1 R/D pair was definitively included (0.6%), which led us to perform the first French UTx in March 2019 with a successful graft. The primary limiting factors of inclusion were due to very strict criteria and difficulty of having a suitable directed living D. The International Society of UTx (ISUTx) guidelines based on worldwide results of trials can help ease our inclusion criteria in the future while remaining safe for patients.