1
|
Iavazzo C, Kokkali K, Kaouras E, Fotiou A. Robotic-assisted fertility sparing surgery in gynecological oncology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 93:102485. [PMID: 38377889 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
While gynecological malignancies are more commonly diagnosed in elderly women, a substantial proportion of women will still be diagnosed with some type of gynecologic cancer during their reproductive age. Over 10% of newly diagnosed ovarian cancers and over one third of newly diagnosed cervical cancers involve women who are under the age of 45. This, coupled with the rising trend of women having their first child after the age of 35, has led to a concerning prevalence of complex fertility issues among women who have been diagnosed with cancer. Since the advent of robotic-assisted surgeries in gynecology, there has been a rise in the occurrence of these procedures. Fertility preserving gynecological surgeries require precise management in order to avoid fertility disorders. Therefore, we conducted a narrative review of robotic assisted fertility sparing surgery in gynecologic malignancies in order to highlight the role of this approach in preserving fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Iavazzo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.
| | - Kalliopi Kokkali
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Kaouras
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Alexandros Fotiou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones BP, Vali S, Saso S, Devaney A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Nicopoullos J, Thum MY, Kaur B, Roufosse C, Stewart V, Bharwani N, Ogbemudia A, Barnardo M, Dimitrov P, Klucniks A, Katz R, Johannesson L, Diaz Garcia C, Udupa V, Friend P, Quiroga I, Smith JR. Living donor uterus transplant in the UK: A case report. BJOG 2024; 131:372-377. [PMID: 37607687 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saaliha Vali
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Devaney
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Candice Roufosse
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Stewart
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ann Ogbemudia
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Barnardo
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Dimitrov
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andris Klucniks
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Katz
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Cesar Diaz Garcia
- IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Venkatesha Udupa
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Friend
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabel Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daum H, Kremer E, Frumkin A, Meiner V, Diamant H, Harel I, Bauman D. A Case Report of Familial Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome as Part of the Phenotypic Spectrum of the 2q37 Deletion. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2024; 37:95-97. [PMID: 37734585 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
We performed a genetic investigation into the case of an inherited Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Our patients were an adolescent and her mother, both with MRKH syndrome. The delivery of a biological offspring was achieved via a gestational carrier. Karyotype and exome sequencing were used to complete a three-generation genetic analysis of the family. Both the mother and her daughter harbored a deletion of 4 Mb at the locus of 2q37, a syndrome rarely described in association with MRKH. No pathogenic single-nucleotide variant relevant to the phenotype was found. The deletion was not inherited from either parent of the mother. In addition, some physical findings suggesting 2q37 deletion syndrome were found in our patients. We conclude that when combined with the use of a gestational carrier or uterine transplantation, the identification of a genetic cause for MRKH may enable the application of preimplantation genetic testing on embryos, thus potentially averting the transmission of the genetic anomaly to subsequent generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hagit Daum
- Department of Genetics, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Einav Kremer
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; Obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ayala Frumkin
- Department of Genetics, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Vardiella Meiner
- Department of Genetics, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hagit Diamant
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Soroka Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Iris Harel
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
| | - Dvora Bauman
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; Obstetrics and gynecology, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jones BP, Vali S, Kasaven LS, Mantrali I, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Nicopoullos J, Thum MY, Diaz-Garcia C, Quiroga I, Yazbek J, Smith JR. INvestigational Study Into Transplantation of the Uterus (INSITU): a cross-sectional survey among women with uterine factor infertility in the UK assessing background, motivations and suitability. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073517. [PMID: 38070921 PMCID: PMC10728960 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The study summarises the selection prescreen criteria currently used in the UK for a uterus transplant and highlights the number of women who are suitable to proceed. OBJECTIVES To assess the demographics, motivations, reasons and suitability among women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) to undergo uterine transplantation (UTx). DESIGN A cross-sectional survey. SETTING An electronic questionnaire was sent via email to women with AUFI who had previously been referred to the UTx research team or approached the Womb Transplant UK Charity. The questions assessed suitability to undergo UTx based on demographic information, perceptions to adoption and surrogacy and reasons why UTx was preferable. Responses were assessed against the study selection criteria. PARTICIPANTS Women with AUFI. RESULTS 210 women completed the questionnaire. The most common aetiology of AUFI in our cohort was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (68%; n=143) whereas 29% (n=62) had previously undergone hysterectomy. 63% (n=132) of the cohort had previously considered adoption, 5% (n=11) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully adopted. The most common reason cited to undergo UTx over adoption was to experience gestation (n=63; 53%), while 37% (n=44) wanted a biologically related child. 76% (n=160) of participants had previously considered surrogacy, 22 (10%) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully become mothers using a surrogate. The most common reason to undergo UTx over surrogacy was to experience gestation (n=77; 54%). 15% (n=21) were concerned about the legal implications, 14% (n=20) identified the financial cost as a barrier and 8% (n=12) could not consider it due to religious reasons. On adhering to the selection criteria, 65 (31%) women were suitable to proceed with the trial. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that implementing commonly used selection criteria for a UTx led to an attrition rate of more than two-thirds of women who requested to initially undergo the process. As more studies present outcomes following UTx, critical assessment of the selection criteria currently used is warranted to ensure potential recipients are not being unnecessarily excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02388802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Saaliha Vali
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lorraine S Kasaven
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ifigenia Mantrali
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph Yazbek
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Richard Smith
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mendilcioglu I, Dogan NU, Ozkan O, Bahceci M, Boynukalin K, Dogan S, Ozkan O. Pregnancy management and outcome after uterus transplantation. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2023; 62:328-335. [PMID: 36468688 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation is a novel approach in women whose uterus is absent or severely abnormal. However, it is still an experimental procedure that poses risks to both mother and baby. To date, 32 live births after uterus transplantation have been reported in peer-reviewed journals, with several maternal, fetal and neonatal complications. The most common complications were preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders and placenta previa. Four patients experienced episodes of transplant rejection during pregnancy. The appropriate management of complicated and non-complicated pregnancies following uterus transplantation is still unresolved. In this review, obstetric outcomes after uterus transplantation and optimal management during pregnancy are discussed in light of the available data. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Mendilcioglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - N U Dogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - O Ozkan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - M Bahceci
- Bahçeci IVF Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - S Dogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - O Ozkan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vali S, Jones BP, Sheikh S, Saso S, Quiroga I, Smith JR. Attitudes, knowledge, and perceptions among women toward uterus transplantation and donation in the United Kingdom. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1223228. [PMID: 37654655 PMCID: PMC10467283 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1223228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the motivations and perceptions of the general public in the United Kingdom toward donating their uterus for Uterus Transplantation after death (UTx). Design A cross sectional study. Setting A 32-item electronic questionnaire. Population One hundred fifty nine females over the age of 16 living in the United Kingdom, consented and took part in the study. Main outcome measures The motivations and perceptions toward UTx among the general public including the willingness to donate and barriers preventing donation. Results One hundred fifty nine women completed the questionnaire. The majority had never heard of UTx (n = 107, 71%) and most were not aware the uterus could be donated after death (n = 130, 92%). 43% of the cohort were willing to donate their uterus after death (n = 57). 8% stated they wished to donate their organs but not their uterus (n = 10). 30% of women (n = 42) believed the child born following UTx would have genetic links to the donor. Over half of the respondents (n = 65, 51%) strongly agreed or agreed they would feel joy in the knowledge that donation would lead to bringing a new life into the world. A quarter of respondents strongly agreed or agreed (n = 45, 25%) that the use of their uterus by another woman would feel like an extension of life. Conclusion The findings indicate a favorable opinion toward UTx and a positive attitude toward donation of the uterus after death among the general public in the United Kingdom. The findings also highlight the need for education around UTx now this therapeutic option is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saaliha Vali
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin P. Jones
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sairah Sheikh
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J. Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bayar E, Williams NJ, Alghrani A, Murugesu S, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Sangster P, Yasmin E, Smith JR, Wilkinson S, Pacey A, Jones BP. Fertility preservation and realignment in transgender women. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:463-482. [PMID: 36799335 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2163195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Medical care for transgender people is multi-faceted and attention to individual reproductive aspirations and planning are an essential, yet often overlooked aspect of care. Given the impact of hormonal therapy and other gender affirmation procedures on reproductive function, extensive counselling and consideration of fertility preservation is recommended prior to their commencement. This review article explores the reproductive aspirations of transgender women and considers the current disparity between stated desires regarding utilisation of fertility preservation services. Current fertility preservation options and prospective treatments currently showing promise in the research arena are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erna Bayar
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Williams
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Amel Alghrani
- School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sughashini Murugesu
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Philippa Sangster
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ephia Yasmin
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Wilkinson
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Allan Pacey
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Department of Gynaecology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sawinski D, Johannesson L, Kristek J, Fronek J, O'Neill KE, Gregg A, Testa G, Porrett PM. A multi-institutional study of renal outcomes and renal-related pregnancy outcomes in uterus transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3101-3110. [PMID: 35822437 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an effective treatment option for uterine factor infertility. However, the need for immunosuppression and congenital renal anomalies that coexist with uterine agenesis in about 30% of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome create a risk for renal dysfunction. We therefore examined renal function trajectory and related pregnancy complications in an international cohort of 18 UTx recipients from September 2016-February 2020 who had at least one live birth. All UTx recipients had a diminution in their renal function that was apparent starting at 30 days posttransplant and in half the reduction in eGFR was at least 20%; the decrease in eGFR persisted into the early post-partum period. Half met criteria for Stage 1 acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the AKI Network criteria during their pregnancy. Overall, 28% of UTx recipients developed pre-eclampsia. eGFR was lower at embryo transfer and throughout pregnancy among those who developed pre-eclampsia, reaching statistical significance at week 16 of pregnancy. This effect was independent of tacrolimus levels. Mean eGFR remained significantly lower in the first 1-3 months after delivery. In the subgroup who reached 12 months of postpartum follow up and had a graft hysterectomy (n = 4), there was no longer a statistical difference in eGFR (pretransplant 106.7 ml/m ± 17.7 vs. 12 mos postpartum 92.6 ml/m ± 21.7, p = .13) but the number was small. Further study is required to delineate long term renal risks for UTx recipients, improve patient selection, and make decisions regarding a second pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Sawinski
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jakub Kristek
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Fronek
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kathleen E O'Neill
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anthony Gregg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Paige M Porrett
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sallée C, Margueritte F, Marquet P, Piver P, Aubard Y, Lavoué V, Dion L, Gauthier T. Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164907. [PMID: 36013146 PMCID: PMC9410422 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine factor infertility (UFI) is defined as a condition resulting from either a complete lack of a uterus or a non-functioning uterus due to many causes. The exact prevalence of UFI is currently unknown, while treatments to achieve pregnancy are very limited. To evaluate the prevalence of this condition within its different causes, we carried out a worldwide systematic review on UFI. We performed research on the prevalence of UFI and its various causes throughout the world, according to the PRISMA criteria. A total of 188 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. UFI accounted for 2.1 to 16.7% of the causes of female infertility. We tried to evaluate the proportion of the different causes of UFI: uterine agenesia, hysterectomies, uterine malformations, uterine irradiation, adenomyosis, synechiae and Asherman syndrome, uterine myomas and uterine polyps. However, the data available in countries and studies were highly heterogenous. This present systematic review underlines the lack of a consensual definition of UFI. A national register of patients with UFI based on a consensual definition of Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility and Non-Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility would be helpful for women, whose desire for pregnancy has reached a dead end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Sallée
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-555-055-555
| | - François Margueritte
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78103 Poissy, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - Pascal Piver
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Yves Aubard
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Universitaire de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Universitaire de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Tristan Gauthier
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Child Hospital, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dorafshar AH, Hamidian Jahromi A, Horen SR, Schechter LS, Johannesson L, Testa G, Hertl M, Dewdney S, Aschkenasy J, Wood-Molo M, Brincat C, Cherullo E, Behel JM, Hebert C, Shulman R, Bassi S, Alecci AT, Konety B. Strategic Planning and Essential Steps for Establishing a Uterine Transplant and Rehabilitation Program: From Idea to Reality. Ann Surg 2022; 276:74-80. [PMID: 34793341 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UTx is performed to address absolute uterine infertility in the presence of uterine agenesis, a nonfunctional uterus, or after a prior hysterectomy. After the initial success of UTx resulting in a livebirth (2014) in Sweden, there are over 70 reported UTx surgeries resulting in more than 40 livebirths worldwide. Currently, UTx has been performed in over 10 countries. As UTx is transitioning from an "experimental procedure" to a clinical option, an increasing number of centers may contemplate a UTx program. This article discusses essential steps for establishment of a successful UTx program. These principles may be implemented in cis- and transgender UTx candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Dorafshar
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sydney R Horen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Loren S Schechter
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- The Center for Gender Confirmation Surgery, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Martin Hertl
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Summer Dewdney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Mary Wood-Molo
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Cynthia Brincat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jay M Behel
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Rush Center for Gender, Sexuality & Reproductive Health, Chicago, IL
| | - Charles Hebert
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Shruti Bassi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Antepartum Care of the Uterus Transplant Patient: The Experience of 3 Successful US Centers. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:84-91. [DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Uterus transplantation (UTx) is transitioning from an experimental procedure to a clinical treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). Standardized protocols for the evaluation and selection of donors and recipients that maximize chances of success - a healthy live birth - are needed. RECENT FINDINGS To date, recipient eligibility has been limited to otherwise healthy women with AUFI who are of childbearing age and are good candidates for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). For donors (living or deceased), selection criteria vary, apart from basic requirements of blood-type compatibility and freedom from critical infectious diseases, but generally require a term birth and a uterus free from uterine pathologies. The stepwise evaluation process for candidate recipients and living donors moves through health screening (medical and psychosocial); initial selection committee review; IVF (recipients only); and final selection committee review. This eliminates candidates with poor chances of success before exposure to unnecessary risks. SUMMARY The currently stringent selection criteria for prospective recipients and donors will likely broaden, as UTx becomes more widely available. Continued research is needed to define the donor, recipient and uterine graft factors associated with successful outcomes, and to support the development of standardized selection criteria.
Collapse
|
15
|
Vali S, Jones BP, Saso S, Fertleman M, Testa G, Johanesson L, Alghrani A, Smith JR. Uterine transplantation: legal and regulatory implications in England. BJOG 2021; 129:590-596. [PMID: 34532958 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is fast evolving from an experimental to a clinical procedure, combining solid organ transplantation with assisted reproductive technology. The commencement of the first human uterus transplant trial in the United Kingdom leads us to examine and reflect upon the legal and regulatory aspects closely intertwined with UTx from the process of donation to potential implications for fertility treatment and the birth of the resultant child. As the world's first ephemeral transplant, the possibility of organ restitution requires consideration and is discussed herein. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine transplantation warrants a closer look at the legal frameworks on fertility treatment and transplantation in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vali
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - B P Jones
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Fertleman
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Testa
- Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - L Johanesson
- Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - A Alghrani
- School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J R Smith
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones BP, Saso S, Yazbek J, Thum MY, Quiroga I, Ghaem-Maghami S, Smith JR. Uterine Transplantation: Scientific Impact Paper No. 65 April 2021. BJOG 2021; 128:e51-e66. [PMID: 33913235 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
A uterine transplant, or womb transplant, provides a potential treatment for women who cannot become pregnant or carry a pregnancy because they do not have a womb, or have a womb that is unable to maintain a pregnancy. This is estimated to affect one in 500 women. Options for those who wish to start a family include adoption and surrogacy, but these are associated with legal, cultural, ethical and religious implications that may not be appropriate for some women and their families. A womb transplant is undertaken when the woman is ready to start a family, and is removed following the completion of their family. Womb transplants have been performed all over the world, with more than 70 procedures carried out so far. At least 23 babies have been born as a result, demonstrating that womb transplants can work. While the procedure offers a different option to adoption and surrogacy, it is associated with significant risks, including multiple major surgeries and the need to take medications that help to dampen the immune system to prevent rejection of the womb. To date there has been a 30% risk of a transplant being unsuccessful. Although the number of transplants to date is still relatively small, the number being performed globally is growing, providing an opportunity to learn from the experience gained so far. This paper looks at the issues that have been encountered, which may arise at each step of the process, and proposes a framework for the future. However, long term follow-up of cases will be essential to draw reliable conclusions about any overall benefits of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B P Jones
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - S Saso
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - J Yazbek
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - M-Y Thum
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - I Quiroga
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - S Ghaem-Maghami
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | - J R Smith
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, London, SE1 1SZ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility the option to gestate and birth their own biologically related child. The first birth following living donation UTx happened in 2014. The first birth following deceased donation happened in December 2017, with further successes since. Interest in deceased donation UTx is increasing. The authors established a database to track UTx clinical trials and outcomes. Utilising this database and existing literature, this article reviews the first reported cases of deceased donation UTx and outcomes, and drawing upon comparisons with living donor UTx, comments upon the future for this area of reproductive transplantation research. This is the first article to bring together the literature on deceased donation UTx procedures and outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Human Uterus Transplantation from Living and Deceased Donors: The Interim Results of the First 10 Cases of the Czech Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040586. [PMID: 33557282 PMCID: PMC7916074 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Uterus transplantation (UTx) is a rapidly evolving treatment of uterine-factor infertility. We report the results of the first 10 UTx procedures performed at our institution. Methods: The program started in April 2016 as a two-arm study comparing the efficacy of UTx from live donors (LD) and deceased donors (DD). Results: Between April 2016 and April 2018, we performed five DD UTx and five LD UTx. Two grafts had to be removed early due to thrombosis. One graft was removed due to chronic rejection and previous herpes simplex infection at month 7. Graft survival is 70% at one year. Recipient survival is 100% at two years. Live donor survival is 100% at three years. Three live-births have been achieved, two from a LD and one from a graft from a nulliparous DD. Vaginal anastomotic stenosis occurred in 63% (5/8) of grafts. Self-expanding stents have shown preliminary suitability for the treatment of vaginal stenosis. Three recipients developed severe acute rejection. Conclusion: The interim results of our study demonstrate mid-term viability in 70% of grafts. The LD UTx produced two live births and the DD UTx produced one live birth. Nulliparous donors should be considered for donation.
Collapse
|