Low risk of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody sensitization after combined kidney and islet transplantation

Islet-after-kidney transplantation versus kidney alone in kidney transplant recipients with type 1 diabetes (KAIAK): a population-based target trial emulation in France

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has been associated with better metabolic control and quality of life than insulin treatment alone, but direct evidence of its effect on hard clinical endpoints is scarce. We aimed to assess the effect of islet transplantation on patient-graft survival in kidney transplant recipients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled all patients with type 1 diabetes who received a kidney graft in France during the study period, identified from the CRISTAL nationwide registry. Non-inclusion criteria included recipients from transplant centres that never proposed islet transplantation during the study period, recipients with a functional pancreas throughout the follow-up duration, recipients with more than two kidney transplants, HLA-sensitised recipients, recipients with less than 1 year of follow-up after kidney transplantation, misclassified recipients with type 2 diabetes, recipients aged over 65 years, recipients of kidney grafts from Donation after Circulatory Death donors, recipient with HIV or hepatitis, recipients with cancer, and recipients of combined liver-kidney transplants. Patients who also received islet-after-kidney (IAK) transplantation were compared with controls who received kidney transplantation alone according to a 1:2 matching method based on time-dependent propensity scores, ensuring patients comparability at the time of islet transplantation. The primary outcome was patient-graft survival, a composite outcome defined by death, re-transplantation, or return to dialysis.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017, 2391 patients with type 1 diabetes were identified as having received a kidney transplant, 47 patients of whom also received an islet transplantation. 2002 patients were not eligible for islet transplantation and 62 were excluded due to missing data. 327 eligible recipients from 15 centres were included in the study dataset for the target trial emulation. 40 patients who received IAK transplantation were successfully matched to 80 patients who received kidney transplantation alone. 13 (33%) of 40 patients in the IAK transplantation group returned to dialysis or died, compared with 36 (45%) of 80 patients in the kidney transplantation alone group. We found a significant benefit of islet transplantation compared with kidney transplantation alone on patient-graft survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·44 (95% CI 0·23-0·88; p=0·022), mainly explained by a protective effect on the risk of death (HR 0·41, 0·13-0·91; p=0·042). There was no meaningful association between IAK and death-censored graft survival (0·73, 0·30-1·89; p=0·36).

INTERPRETATION

In kidney transplant recipients with type 1 diabetes, IAK transplantation was associated with a significantly better patient-graft survival compared with kidney transplantation alone, mainly due to a protective effect on the risk of death. These results potentially serve as compelling grounds for advocating wider access to islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing kidney transplant, as reimbursement of islet transplantation is provided in few countries worldwide.

FUNDING

Programme Hospitalier de la Recherche Clinique, Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale, and Fonds de Dotation Line Renaud-Loulou Gasté.

The challenge of HLA donor specific antibodies in the management of pancreatic islet transplantation: an illustrative case-series

Islet transplantation is a unique paradigm in organ transplantation, since multiple donors are required to achieve complete insulin-independence. Preformed or de novo Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) may target one or several donor islets, which adds complexity to the analysis of their impact. Adult patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with pancreatic islets between 2005 and 2018 were included in a single-center observational study. Thirty-two recipients with available sera tested by solid-phase assays for anti-HLA antibodies during their whole follow-up were analyzed. Twenty-five recipients were islet-transplantation-alone recipients, and 7 islet-after-kidney recipients. Seven recipients presented with DSA at any time during follow-up (two with preformed DSA only, one with preformed and de novo DSA, 4 with de novo DSA only). Only islet-transplantation-alone recipients presented with de novo DSA. Three clinical trajectories were identified according to: 1/the presence of preformed DSA, 2/early de novo DSA or 3/late de novo DSA. Only late de novo DSA were associated with unfavorable outcomes, depicted by a decrease of the β-score. Islet transplantation with preformed DSA, even with high MFI values, is associated with favorable outcomes in our experience. On the contrary, de novo DSA, and especially late de novo DSA, may be associated with allograft loss.

Pancreatic Islet Transplantation in Humans: Recent Progress and Future Directions

Pancreatic islet transplantation has become an established approach to β-cell replacement therapy for the treatment of insulin-deficient diabetes. Recent progress in techniques for islet isolation, islet culture, and peritransplant management of the islet transplant recipient has resulted in substantial improvements in metabolic and safety outcomes for patients. For patients requiring total or subtotal pancreatectomy for benign disease of the pancreas, isolation of islets from the diseased pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of autologous islets can prevent or ameliorate postsurgical diabetes, and for patients previously experiencing painful recurrent acute or chronic pancreatitis, quality of life is substantially improved. For patients with type 1 diabetes or insulin-deficient forms of pancreatogenic (type 3c) diabetes, isolation of islets from a deceased donor pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of allogeneic islets can ameliorate problematic hypoglycemia, stabilize glycemic lability, and maintain on-target glycemic control, consequently with improved quality of life, and often without the requirement for insulin therapy. Because the metabolic benefits are dependent on the numbers of islets transplanted that survive engraftment, recipients of autoislets are limited to receive the number of islets isolated from their own pancreas, whereas recipients of alloislets may receive islets isolated from more than one donor pancreas. The development of alternative sources of islet cells for transplantation, whether from autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic tissues, is an active area of investigation that promises to expand access and indications for islet transplantation in the future treatment of diabetes.

Immunogenicity of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Pancreas and Islet Transplantation

The aim of the current study was to characterize the anti-HLA antibodies before and after pancreatic islet or pancreas transplantation. We assessed the risk of anti-donor-specific antibody (DSA) sensitization in a single-center, retrospective clinical study at Geneva University Hospital. Data regarding clinical characteristics, graft outcome, HLA mismatch, donor HLA immunogenicity, and anti-HLA antibody characteristics were collected. Between January 2008 and July 2014, 18 patients received islet transplants, and 26 patients received a pancreas transplant. Eleven out of 18 patients (61.1%) in the islet group and 12 out of 26 patients (46.2%) in the pancreas group had anti-HLA antibodies. Six patients (33.3%) developed DSAs against HLA of the islets, and 10 patients (38.4%) developed DSAs against HLA of the pancreas. Most of the DSAs were at a low level. Several parameters such as gender, number of times cells were transplanted, HLA mismatch, eplet mismatch and PIRCHE-II numbers, rejection, and infection were analyzed. Only the number of PIRCHE-II was associated with the development of anti-HLA class II de novo DSAs. Overall, the development of de novo DSAs did not influence graft survival as estimated by insulin independence. Our results indicated that pretransplant DSAs at low levels do not restrict islet or pancreas transplantation [especially islet transplantation (27.8% vs. 15.4.%)]. De novo DSAs do occur at a similar rate in both pancreas and islet transplant recipients (mainly of class II), and the immunogenicity of donor HLA is a parameter that should be taken into consideration. When combined with an immunosuppressive regimen and close follow-up, development of low levels of DSAs was not found to result in reduced graft survival or graft function in the current study.

Long-term effects of islet transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Islet transplantation has made great progress in recent years. This is a remarkable technical feat but raises the question of what the long-term benefits and risks are for type I diabetes recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Graft survival continues to improve, and recent multicenter studies show that islet transplantation is particularly effective to prevent hypoglycemic events even in those who do not become insulin-independent and to achieve excellent glycemic control. Concerns include histocompatability leucocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization and other risks including from immunosuppression that islet transplantation shares with other forms of allotransplantation.

SUMMARY

Reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness and protection from severe hypoglycemia events are two of the main benefits of islet transplantation and they persist for the duration of graft function. Islet transplantation compares favorably with other therapies for those with hypoglycemia unawareness, although new technologies have not been tested head-to-head with transplantation. HLA sensitization increases with time after transplantation especially if immunosuppression is ceased and is a risk for those who may require future transplantation as well as being associated with loss of graft function.

De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated With Rapid Loss of Graft Function Following Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes

Outcomes after islet transplantation continue to improve but etiology of graft failure remains unclear. De novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) posttransplant are increasingly recognized as a negative prognostic marker. Specific temporal associations between DSA and graft function remain undefined particularly in programs undertaking multiple sequential transplants. Impact of de novo DSA on graft function over 12 months following first islet transplant was determined prospectively in consecutive recipients taking tacrolimus/mycophenolate immunosuppression at a single center. Mixed-meal tolerance test was undertaken in parallel with HLA antibody assessment pretransplant and 1-3 months posttransplant. Sixteen participants received a total of 26 islet transplants. Five (19%) grafts were associated with de novo DSA. Five (31%) recipients were affected: three post-first transplant; two post-second transplant. DSA developed within 4 weeks of all sensitizing grafts and were associated with decreased stimulated C-peptide (median [interquartile range]) at 3 months posttransplant (DSA negative: 613(300-1090); DSA positive 106(34-235) pmol/L [p = 0.004]). De novo DSA directed against most recent islet transplant were absolutely associated with loss of graft function despite maintained immunosuppression at 12 months in the absence of a rescue nonsensitizing transplant. Alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression was associated with reduced incidence of de novo DSA formation (p = 0.03).

Transplant options for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a real epidemic around the world, mainly due to ageing and diabetic nephropathy. Although diabetic nephropathy due to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been studied more extensively, the vast majority of the diabetic CKD patients suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Renal transplantation has been established as a first line treatment for diabetic nephropathy unless there are major contraindications and provides not only a better quality of life, but also a significant survival advantage over dialysis. However, T2DM patients are less likely to be referred for renal transplantation as they are usually older, obese and present significant comorbidities. As pre-emptive renal transplantation presents a clear survival advantage over dialysis, all T2DM patients with CKD should be referred for early evaluation by a transplant center. The transplant center should have enough time in order to examine their eligibility focusing on special issues related with diabetic nephropathy and explore the best options for each patient. Living donor kidney transplantation should always be considered as the first line treatment. Otherwise, the patient should be listed for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Recent progress in transplantation medicine has improved the “transplant menu” for T2DM patients with diabetic nephropathy and there is an ongoing discussion about the place of simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation in well selected patients. The initial hesitations about the different pathophysiology of T2DM have been forgotten due to the almost similar short- and long-term results with T1DM patients. However, there is still a long way and a lot of ethical and logistical issues before establishing SPK transplantation as an ordinary treatment for T2DM patients. In addition recent advances in bariatric surgery may offer new options for severely obese T2DM patients with CKD. Nevertheless, the existing data for T2DM patients with advanced CKD are rather scarce and bariatric surgery should not be considered as a cure for diabetic nephropathy, but only as a bridge for renal transplantation.

Predictive factors of allosensitization after immunosuppressant withdrawal in recipients of long-term cultured islet cell grafts

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has been reported to induce allosensitization in the majority of type 1 diabetic recipients of fresh or shortly incubated islet grafts prepared from one to three donors.

METHODS

We examined the appearance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies after withdrawal of immunosuppressants in 35 type 1 diabetic recipients of islet cell grafts prepared from a median of 6 donors (range, 2-11), cultured for longer periods, and characterized for their cellular composition. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by mycophenolate mofetil plus calcineurin inhibitors (n=28, with 7 also receiving steroids) or sirolimus with (n=3) or without calcineurin inhibitors (n=4). Both the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay (class I) and the solid-phase flow-based Luminex method (class I and II) were used to identify HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

Immunosuppressant withdrawal resulted in CDC positivity for class I antibodies in only 6% of patients. However, the majority became positive for class I antibodies (72%) or class II antibodies (72%) in the Luminex assay; positivity was not correlated to a higher number of donors or HLA mismatches, but with a lower β-cell purity; use of steroids reduced de novo positivity for Luminex class I antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Allosensitization to cultured human islet cell grafts was low when assessed by CDC assay but high in Luminex. No correlation was found with the number of donors but risk was higher for grafts with lower β-cell purity.

Alloantibody and autoantibody monitoring predicts islet transplantation outcome in human type 1 diabetes

Long-term clinical outcome of islet transplantation is hampered by the rejection and recurrence of autoimmunity. Accurate monitoring may allow for early detection and treatment of these potentially compromising immune events. Islet transplant outcome was analyzed in 59 consecutive pancreatic islet recipients in whom baseline and de novo posttransplant autoantibodies (GAD antibody, insulinoma-associated protein 2 antigen, zinc transporter type 8 antigen) and donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) were quantified. Thirty-nine recipients (66%) showed DSA or autoantibody increases (de novo expression or titer increase) after islet transplantation. Recipients who had a posttransplant antibody increase showed similar initial performance but significantly lower graft survival than patients without an increase (islet autoantibodies P < 0.001, DSA P < 0.001). Posttransplant DSA or autoantibody increases were associated with HLA-DR mismatches (P = 0.008), induction with antithymocyte globulin (P = 0.0001), and pretransplant panel reactive alloantibody >15% in either class I or class II (P = 0.024) as independent risk factors and with rapamycin as protective (P = 0.006) against antibody increases. DSA or autoantibody increases after islet transplantation are important prognostic markers, and their identification could potentially lead to improved islet cell transplant outcomes.

Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes: ongoing challenges, refined procedures, and long-term outcome

Remarkable progress has been made in islet transplantation over a span of 40 years. Once just an experimental curiosity in mice, this therapy has moved forward, and can now provide robust therapy for highly selected patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), refractory to stabilization by other means. This progress could not have occurred without extensive dynamic international collaboration. Currently, 1,085 patients have undergone islet transplantation at 40 international sites since the Edmonton Protocol was reported in 2000 (752 allografts, 333 autografts), according to the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry. The long-term results of islet transplantation in selected centers now match registry data of pancreas-alone transplantation, with 6 sites reporting five-year insulin independence rates ≥50%. Islet transplantation has been criticized for the use of multiple donor pancreas organs, but progress has also occurred in single-donor success, with 10 sites reporting increased single-donor engraftment. The next wave of innovative clinical trial interventions will address instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR), apoptosis, and inflammation, and will translate into further marked improvements in single-donor success. Effective control of auto- and alloimmunity is the key to long-term islet function, and high-resolution cellular and antibody-based assays will add considerable precision to this process. Advances in immunosuppression, with new antibody-based targeting of costimulatory blockade and other T-B cellular signaling, will have further profound impact on the safety record of immunotherapy. Clinical trials will move forward shortly to test out new human stem cell derived islets, and in parallel trials will move forward, testing pig islets for compatibility in patients. Induction of immunological tolerance to self-islet antigens and to allografts is a difficult challenge, but potentially within our grasp.

Posttransplant Cellular Immune Reactivity against Donor Antigen Correlates with Clinical Islet Transplantation Outcome: Towards a Better Posttransplant Monitoring

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficiency of cell-based immune assays in the detection of alloreactivity after islet transplantation and to correlate these results with clinical outcome. Mixed lymphocyte cultures were performed with peripheral blood mononuclear cells from recipients ( n = 14), donors, or third party. The immune reactivity was assessed by the release of IFN-γ (ELISpot), cell proliferation (FACS analysis for Ki67), and cytokine quantification (Bioplex). Islet function correlated with the number of IFN-γ-secreting cells following incubation with donor cells ( p = 0.007, r = –0.50), but not with third party cells ( p = 0.61). Similarly, a high number of donor-specific proliferating cells was associated with a low islet function ( p = 0.006, r = −0.51). Proliferating cells were mainly CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes and CD3-CD56+ natural killer cells (with low levels of CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes). Patients with low islet function had increased levels of CD4+Ki67+cells ( p ≤ 0.0001), while no difference was observed in CD8+Ki67+ and CD56+Ki67+ cells. IFN-γ, IL-5, and IL-17 levels were increased in patients with low islet function, but IL-10 levels tended to be lower. IFN-γ-ELISpot, proliferation, and cytokines were similarly accurate in predicting clinical outcome (AUC = 0.77 ± 0.088, 0.85 ± 0.084, and 0.88 ± 0.074, respectively). Cellular immune reactivity against donor cells correlates with posttransplant islet function. The tested assays have the potential to be of substantial help in the management of islet graft recipients and deserve prospective validation.

Impact of the number of infusions on 2-year results of islet-after-kidney transplantation in the GRAGIL network

BACKGROUND

Insulin independence after islet transplantation is generally achieved after multiple infusions. However, single infusion would increase the number of recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of islet-after-kidney transplantation according to the number of infusions.

METHODS

Islets were isolated at the Geneva University, shipped, and transplanted into French patients from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network, on the "Edmonton" immunosuppression protocol between 2004 and 2010.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were transplanted with 33 preparations. Fifteen patients reached 24 months follow-up; eight subjects were single-graft recipients and seven were double-graft recipients. Finally, single-graft recipients received a median of 5312 islet equivalents/kg (5186-6388) vs. 10,564 (10,054-11,375) for double-graft recipients (P=0.0003) with similar islet mass at first infusion. Insulin independence was achieved in five of eight single-graft subjects (62.5%) versus five of seven in double-graft subjects (71.4%), not significant. Median insulin independence duration was 4.7 (3.1-15.2) months after one infusion vs. 19 (9.6-20.8) months after two infusions (not significant). At 24 months posttransplant, comparing single- with double-graft patients, insulin doses were 0.23 (0.11-0.34) U/kg vs. 0.02 (0.0-0.23) U/kg, P=0.11; HbA1c was 6.5% (5.9%-6.8%) vs. 6.2% (5.9%-6.3%), P=0.16; and basal C-peptide was 302 (143-480) pmol/L vs. 599 (393-806) pmol/L, P=0.05. Only 37.5% of single-graft patients had a β-score ≥4 compared with 100% of double-graft patients (P=0.03). Two recipients experienced postinfusion bleeding, and two patients (13%) showed renal dysfunction in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

One infusion achieves good glycemic control and sometimes insulin independence. However, double-graft patients remain insulin-free longer, tend to have lower HbA1c, and show better graft function 24 months after transplant.

HLA class I sensitization in islet transplant recipients: report from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising treatment option for patients severely affected with type 1 diabetes. This report from CITR presents pre- and posttransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I sensitization rates in islet-alone transplantation. Data came from 303 recipients transplanted with islet-alone between January 1999 and December 2008. HLA class I sensitization was determined by the presence of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) from prior to islet infusion and at 6 months, and yearly posttransplant was correlated to measures of islet graft failure. The cumulative number of mismatched HLA alleles increased with each additional islet infusion from a median of 3 for one infusion to 9 for three infusions. Pretransplant PRA was not predictive of islet graft failure. However, development of PRA >20% posttransplant was associated with 3.6-fold (p < 0.001) increased hazard ratio for graft failure. Patients with complete graft loss who had discontinued immunosuppression had significantly higher rate of PRA ≥ 20% compared to those with functioning grafts who remained on immunosuppression. Exposure to repeat HLA class I mismatch at second or third islet infusions resulted in less frequent development of de novo HLA class I antibodies when compared to increased class I mismatch. The development of HLA class I antibodies while on immunosuppression is associated with subsequent islet graft failure. The risk of sensitization may be reduced by minimizing the number of islet donors used per recipient, and in the absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, repeating HLA class I mismatches with subsequent islet infusions.

Noninvasive imaging techniques in islet transplantation

Since the Edmonton trials, insulin independence can reproducibly be achieved after islet transplantation. However, a majority of patients resume insulin treatment in the first 5 years after transplantation. Several mechanisms have been proposed but are difficult to pinpoint in one particular patient. Current tools for the metabolic monitoring of islet grafts indicate islet dysfunction when it is too late to take action. Noninvasive imaging of transplanted islets could be used to study β-cell mass and β-cell function just after infusion, during vascularization or autoimmune and alloimmune attacks. This review will focus on the most recent advances in various imaging techniques (bioluminescence imaging, fluorescence optical imaging, MRI, and positron emission tomography). Emphasis will be placed on pertinent approaches for translation to human practice.

Immune monitoring of pancreatic islet graft: towards a better understanding, detection and treatment of harmful events

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Long-term clinical outcomes of islet transplantation are hampered by rejection and recurrence of autoimmunity, which lead to a gradual decrease in islet function usually taking place over the first five years after transplantation. An accurate monitoring strategy could allow for the detection and treatment of harmful immune events, potentially resulting in higher rates of insulin-independence.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article provides a critical review of the various assays currently available for the assessment of allo- and autoimmunity both prior to and after islet transplantation. The accuracy in predicting clinical outcome is specifically addressed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Most current tests based on the assessment of allo- and auto-immune antibody are of minimal help in clinical practice. Cell-based tests (including the assessment of cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors, proliferation tests, enzyme-linked immunospot) have the potential to allow earlier and more accurate detection of harmful events.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

A specific and accurate immune monitoring has the potential to significantly improve islet transplant outcomes. The development and use of such tests (favouring cell-based tests) should be promoted.

Islet transplantation using donors after cardiac death: report of the Japan Islet Transplantation Registry

BACKGROUND

This report summarizes outcomes of islet transplantation employing donors after cardiac death (DCD) between 2004 and 2007 as reported to the Japan Islet Transplantation Registry.

METHOD

Sixty-five islet isolations were performed for 34 transplantations in 18 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, including two patients who had prior kidney transplantation. All but one donor (64/65) was DCD at the time of harvesting.

RESULTS

Factors influencing criteria for islet release included duration of low blood pressure of the donor, cold ischemic time, and usage of Kyoto solution for preservation. Multivariate analysis selected usage of Kyoto solution as most important. Of the 18 recipients, 8, 4, and 6 recipients received 1, 2, and 3 islet infusions, respectively. Overall graft survival defined as C-peptide level more than or equal to 0.3 ng/mL was 76.5%, 47.1%, and 33.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, whereas corresponding graft survival after multiple transplantations was 100%, 80.0%, and 57.1%, respectively. All recipients remained free of severe hypoglycemia while three achieved insulin independence for 14, 79, and 215 days. HbA1c levels and requirement of exogenous insulin were significantly improved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Islet transplantation employing DCD can ameliorate severe hypoglycemic episodes, significantly improve HbA1c levels, sustain significant levels of C-peptide, and achieve insulin independence after multiple transplantations. Thus, DCD can be an important resource for islet transplantation if used under strict releasing criteria and in multiple transplantations, particularly in countries where heart-beating donors are not readily available.

Evidence for humoral rejection of a pancreatic islet graft and rescue with rituximab and IV immunoglobulin therapy

We describe the decline in islet function, in relation to HLA sensitization, in an islet transplant recipient and the recovery of this function after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and IV immunoglobulins. A 51-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes received one intraportal islet infusion. Following this transplantation, she became insulin independent. A search for HLA antibodies by using an ELISA technique remained consistently negative for HLA class I and II. It was only 2 years after the islet transplantation that this search became positive against class II antigens, reaching a peak of reactivity concomitantly with the appearance of a deterioration of glucose control requiring low-dose insulin therapy. Luminex screening and single-antigen assays then revealed the presence of both nondonor-specific and donor-specific antibodies against HLA class II molecules. This immunization, already present in the pretransplant serum, had increased during the 6 months preceding the clinical deterioration. Since these data nevertheless pointed to antibody-mediated rejection of the islet allograft, treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and IV immunoglobulins was initiated. One month later, the search by ELISA for antibodies against HLA class II antigens became negative, the Luminex tests normalizing more gradually. As the result of an improvement in glucose control, the patient was again insulin-free.

[Pancreas and islet transplantation]

Pancreas transplantation is a successful and effective procedure resulting in tight glucose control. Due to the postoperative morbidity and the need for immunosuppression pancreas transplantation should be considered in patients with type I diabetes at the time of kidney transplantation. Besides this pancreas transplantation alone can be taken into consideration for patients with very poor metabolic control and quality of life despite optimal medical treatment. Recently, islet transplantation became a less invasive alternative to pancreas transplantation. Due to the lack of long-term follow-up and due to the need of multiple donor grafts for one recipient, islet transplantation should be performed under experimental settings in experienced centers. New developments in protecting transplanted islets and in the induction of donor-specific tolerance could increase the indication to perform the procedure. Therefore alternative sources of beta-cells have to be identified.