Tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: the evidence for prophylaxis. Transplantation. 2010;90:695-704. [PMID: 20647975 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181ecea8d]

Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of tuberculosis in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis to prevent tuberculosis (TB) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods: Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant studies that compared the effects among patients who received INH prophylaxis after transplantation.

Results: A total of 13 studies (involving 6,547 KTRs) were included in our analysis. We found that the risk of active TB infection (RR: 0.35, 95%CI 0.27–0.45, p < 0.01) for KTRs was lower in the INH treatment group than in those without prophylaxis. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (RR: 0.93, 95%CI 0.67–1.28, p = 0.64), acute rejection (RR: 0.82, 95%CI 0.44–1.51, p = 0.52), and hepatotoxicity (RR: 1.25, 95%CI 0.94–1.65, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: Isoniazid prophylaxis is a safe and effective for KTRs on reactivation of latent TB infection.

Comparison of three short-course rifamycin-based regimens for the prevention of tuberculosis in patients with end-stage kidney disease: Study protocol for a randomised clinical trial (RIFAKiD-TB trial)

Background and purpose

Screening for and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are recommended. However, there is limited evidence on safety and treatment completion in this population. The objective of the study is to evaluate three short-course rifamycin-based regimens for the treatment of latent TB in ESKD patients.

Methods

Study design and setting. This is a prospective, open label, randomized clinical trial, that will be conducted at seven teaching hospitals in Spain.

Study population, randomization, and interventions. Consecutive adult patients with ESKD requiring treatment for a latent TB infection will be randomly allocated (1:1:1) to receive one of the three treatment regimens of the study: three months of daily isoniazid plus rifampicin (3HR); three months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (3HP); or four months of daily rifampicin (4R). Participants will be followed regularly through pre-established visits and a blood test schedule from enrolment to a month after finishing the assigned treatment.

Outcomes. The primary outcome will be treatment completion, while the secondary outcomes will be discontinuation of the assigned treatment due to adverse events, related or unrelated to the study treatment; definitive discontinuation of the assigned treatment because of adverse events related to the treatment of the study, and death.

Sample size. Two hundred and twenty-five subjects (75 per arm) will be enrolled, which will enable the demonstration, if it exists, of an increase of 0.16 in treatment completion rates either in the 3HP or 4R arm with respect to the 3HR arm.

Discussion

Results of this clinical trial will contribute to evidence-based recommendations on the management of latent TB infection in ESKD patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05021731.

TB in paediatric kidney transplant recipients - A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

TB remains a major challenge in transplantation, particularly in endemic countries. This study aimed to describe the incidence, clinical presentation and outcomes of TB in paediatric kidney transplant recipients and to assess the impact of INH prophylaxis.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective descriptive analysis of children who received kidney transplants from 1995 to 2019 was carried out. The cohort was stratified according to receipt of INH prophylaxis which began in 2005.

RESULTS

A total of 212 children received a kidney transplant during the study period. Median age at transplantation was 11.2 years (IQR: 2.2-17.9), and 56% were males. TB was diagnosed in 20 (9%) children, with almost two-thirds (n = 12) occurring within the first year. Most infections were pulmonary. The main presenting symptoms included fever (n = 13/20), weight loss (n = 12/20) and cough (n = 10/20). TST was positive in four of 20 children. Coinfection with EBV, CMV or Staph was found in five children. Due to drug interactions, an up to threefold increase in calcineurin inhibitor dose was required to maintain therapeutic blood levels. INH prophylaxis was protective against development of TB (p = .04). Gender, age and type of allograft were not significant risk factors. Graft and patient survival was 100% upon completion of TB treatment.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant recipients in endemic countries have a high risk of developing TB. Diagnosis remains a challenge. Frequent and meticulous monitoring of immunosuppression drug levels during treatment of TB is required to avoid loss of patient or graft. INH prophylaxis protects against development of TB in this population.

Mycobacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains a major challenge for physicians and surgeons. Active tuberculosis (TB) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. MTB usually develops after transplantation in a recipient with latent TB infection (LTBI) before transplantation and may also be transmitted from the donor or acquired from the community. Therefore, screening for LTBI in donors and recipients before transplantation is very important in preventing active disease after transplantation. This review article is based on recently published data, case series, and expert recommendations. We reviewed updated information about the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of latent and active TB before and after transplantation. We also reviewed recent treatments for multidrug-resistant TB.

Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Management of Contact Patients in a Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To describe the investigation, follow-up, management and outcomes in a cohort of chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients exposed to a case of pulmonary tuberculosis.

METHODS

Contacts were investigated following a concentric circles approach and followed-up according to their level of priority. In those with an evidence of latent tuberculous infection, treatment decision was based on the level of exposure, individual vulnerability, as well as the results of an interferon-gamma release assay.

RESULTS

130 patients with chronic kidney disease and 180 kidney transplant recipients were identified as contacts and followed-up over a two-year period.Only few vulnerable high-priority contacts received an anti-tuberculosis treatment, including the 2 (100%)highly exposed patients in circle 1, 11/78(14.1%)chronic kidney disease patients and 4/142 (2.8%) kidney transplant recipients in circle 2, and10/52 (19.2%) chronic kidney disease patients and 2/36 (5.6%) kidney transplant recipients in circle 3;all having a positive interferon-gamma release assay result. No incident case of tuberculosis disease occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that latent tuberculosis treatment, as recommended in European guidelines, might be reasonably avoided in vulnerable high-priority contacts of circle 2 with a negative interferon-gamma release assay in countries with low prevalence of tuberculosis.

Latent tuberculosis screening before kidney transplantation in the South of Brazil

Background:

Tuberculosis (TB) is a prevalent infection after kidney transplantation (KT) in high-burden countries. Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening includes previous TB history, chest radiograph findings, and tuberculin test (TST) and/or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) results. We aimed to compare our routine LTBI screening of KT candidates and living donors (LD) with their IGRA results, and evaluate if this would improve isoniazid (INH) treatment referral.

Methods:

We evaluated adult KT candidates and LD with complete routine LTBI screening and QuantiFERON-TB® Gold In-Tube (QFT) testing. Blood samples were collected from April 4th, 2014 to October 31st, 2018, with follow-up until October 31st, 2019.

Results:

There were 116 KT recipients, with 30% QFT-positive results. Positive QFT was associated with past TB history (p=0.007), positive TST (p<0.0001), residual radiographic lesions (p=0.003), and diabetes (p=0.035). There were 25 LD, 40% had positive QFT. Positive QFT was associated with a positive TST (p=0.002). Positive QFT results increased INH referral in 80%. Post-transplant TB incidence was 2.6% in a median follow-up of 2 (1-33) months. No variables were associated with post-transplant TB. TB patients had inferior, although non-significant, 5-year graft survival (66.7% vs. 76.5%) (p = 0.402).

Conclusion:

In the present study, the association of QFT to our routine LTBI screening incremented INH treatment referral, but there was still a high incidence of post-transplant TB, possibly related to other forms of infection, such as new exposure and donor transmission.

Tuberculosis prevention in patients undergoing kidney transplantation: A nurse-led program for screening and treatment

BACKGROUND

Systematic screening for, and treatment of, latent tuberculosis (TB) infection is recommended prior to kidney transplant. However, little is known about patient compliance with, or the safety profile of, preventive therapies used in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients who were eligible for kidney transplant and were evaluated for TB infection between January 2013 and June 2019 at the TB clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital. All patient data were registered prospectively as part of our nurse-led program before kidney transplant. We assessed completion rates, tolerance with therapy, development of TB, and associated workload.

RESULTS

In total, 1568 patients were referred to our TB clinic for evaluation. Preventive therapy was given to 385 patients and completed by 340 (88.3%). Of these, 89 (23.1%) experienced some intolerance, with 27 requiring full discontinuation. After a median follow-up of 45 months (1426 patient-years), 206 (53.5%) of the treated patients received a kidney transplant; only one patient, who failed to complete treatment, developed post-transplant TB (7.01 cases per 10 000 patient-years; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-34.59). Extra nurse or medical visits were required by 268 (69.6%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complexity and workload generated by patients with ESRD awaiting kidney transplant, preventive therapy for TB is effective in most cases. Our experience provides important evidence on the feasibility of preventive therapy for TB before kidney transplant when delivered as part of a comprehensive nurse-led program.

Tuberculosis in an Allogeneic Transplant Kidney: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common post-transplant infection with high prevalence in developing countries due to reactivation. Post-transplant TB involves the respiratory system in 50% of patients, followed by disseminated involvement in 30%. The risk of tuberculosis of renal allograft post-transplantation is determined by disease endemicity in the donor population and the immunosuppressant regimen. TB can cause allograft rejection and graft loss due to delayed diagnosis or reduced immunosuppressant drug efficacy. A 23-year-old lady was seen 40 days after cadaveric unrelated renal transplantation from China. She was on immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone. Examination showed low-grade fever and infected surgical site in the right iliac fossa draining pus. Imaging showed fluid pockets, parenchymal micro-abscesses, and perinephric collections in the right iliac fossa communicating with skin. A diagnosis of renal allograft TB without dissemination was made after TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from early morning urine was positive. She was started on anti-TB therapy. The sinus tract healed, and renal parameters improved after six months of therapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed resolution of the micro-abscesses as well as the surrounding fluid collection. Renal angiogram demonstrated well-perfused, normally functioning, non-obstructed renal transplant. Tuberculosis of renal allograft should be considered in a transplant recipient with pyrexia of unknown origin and persistent discharge from the surgical site, not responding to antimicrobials. Tuberculosis of transplant kidney can cause graft loss due to allograft rejection when there is a delayed diagnosis, or as anti-TB drugs reduce the efficacy of immunosuppressant medications. The index of suspicion should be high when donor status is unknown or if the donor is from an endemic tuberculosis area. Timely diagnosis and treatment helped to save the transplanted kidney of our patient without rejection.

High prevalence of latent tuberculosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A First Report

TB is an increasing health problem, and patients undergoing HSCT are more prone to develop tuberculosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate prevalence of latent tuberculosis in HSCT recipients. In this study, 84 patients (2 months to 18 years) who were candidates for HSCT at the referral hospital of Tehran Children's Medical Center were enrolled. The TST and the QFT-GIT test were performed in all 84 patients, simultaneously. LTBI was considered when one of the tests was positive. Overall, the prevalence of LTBI in HSCT recipients in our study was 12% (10 cases). TST induration ≥5 mm was seen in only three patients (3.5%). Eight patients (9.5%) had a positive result for IGRA test, and 11 of them (13%) had indeterminate QFT-GIT result. The agreement between the TST results (induration size ≥5 mm) and the QFT-GIT results was poor (kappa = 0.14). In conclusion, there was a high rate of discordance between TST and IGRA results with many more positive QFT-GIT tests. However, more studies are needed in this population to determine whether this discordance reflects true infection.

Latent Tuberculosis Therapy Outcomes in Dialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES

Maintenance dialysis patients are at an increased risk for active tuberculosis (TB). In 2012, British Columbia, Canada, began systematically screening maintenance dialysis patients for latent TB infection (LTBI) and treating people with evidence of LTBI when appropriate. We examined LTBI treatment outcomes and compared treatment outcomes before and after rollout of the systematic screening program.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 365 people in British Columbia, Canada, initiating at least 90 days of dialysis from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2017, and starting LTBI therapy: 290 (79.5%) people in the recent cohort and 75 (20.5%) in the historical cohort. People starting LTBI therapy from January 1, 2012, onward were classified as the recent cohort, whereas people starting LTBI therapy before January 1, 2012, were classified as the historical cohort.

EXPOSURE

Systematic LTBI screening and therapy.

OUTCOMES

Proportion of people who experience grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs) or any grade rash and end-of-treatment outcomes.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Outcomes were reported using descriptive statistics. 2-sample test of proportions using χ² distribution was used to test for statistical significance between the recent and historical cohorts.

RESULTS

298 (81.6%) people successfully completed LTBI therapy. The proportion of people experiencing a grade 3 to 4 AE or any grade rash was 21.1%. Most AEs were related to gastrointestinal events, general malaise, or pruritus that resulted in regimen changes. 2 (0.5%) people were hospitalized for AEs related to LTBI therapy. No significant difference was found between the recent and historical cohorts in all outcomes of interest. No grade 5 AEs (deaths) were attributed to LTBI therapy.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective data and generalizability outside low-TB-burden settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a high proportion of people receiving maintenance dialysis can complete LTBI therapy. The rate of grade 3 to 4 AEs was high and associated with frequent medication changes during therapy. LTBI therapy in maintenance dialysis may be safe but requires close monitoring.

Laryngeal tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: A case report and review of the literature

Renal allograft recipients are at greater risk of developing tuberculosis than the general population. A woman with a kidney transplant was admitted to our emergency department with high temperature, dysphonia, odynophagia, and asthenia. The final diagnosis was laryngeal tuberculosis. Multidisciplinary collaboration enabled accurate diagnosis and successful treatment. Laryngeal tuberculosis should be considered in renal allograft recipients with hoarseness. A more rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients is desirable when the site involved, such as the larynx, exhibits specific manifestations and the patient exhibits specific symptoms. In these cases, prognosis is excellent, and with adequate treatment a complete recovery is often achieved.

Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its management in transplant recipients is difficult and highly complex, given the underlying immunosuppression and the risks of drug-drug interactions imposed by immunosuppressive drugs that are needed to maintain the transplant allograft.Areas covered: We provide a brief review of TB in SOT and discuss the clinical indications, mechanisms of action and drug resistance, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects of anti-TB drugs. We provide a summary of recent clinical trials, which serve as the foundation for current recommendations. We further include relevant updates on new agents being evaluated for clinical use in TB management.Expert commentary: TB causes significant morbidity in SOT recipients. The drugs used in the treatment for latent TB and active disease in SOT are similar to the regimens used in the general population. However, TB disease in transplant recipients is more difficult to manage because of the potential for hepatotoxicity and the complex drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs. We believe that alternative regimens suited for the vulnerable transplant population, and more therapeutic drug options are needed given the adverse toxicities associated with currently approved anti-TB drugs.

Treatment of latent TB Infection and the risk of tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: Comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease may occur after treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI). Prompted by a case of reactivation TB disease in a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient who received LTBI treatment, we reviewed the literature to examine outcomes, adverse effects, resistance, and treatment choices of tuberculosis after LTBI therapy.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to 5/2019 were reviewed using key words "latent tuberculosis infection" and "SOT" or "transplantation." The search yielded nine cases, 41 cohort studies and six randomized controlled trials (RCT).

RESULTS

Cohort and RCT demonstrated significant reduction in TB disease among transplanted patients who received LTBI therapy; only 56/2651 (2.1%) SOT patients developed TB after LTBI therapy. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 149/1148 (12.9%) and 73/641 (11.4%) of cohort and RCT patients, respectively. Among liver recipients, 56/266 (21%) developed side effects, of which half (29/56, 51.8%) was INH-related. There was no reported INH resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Latent TB infection treatment is efficacious in SOT recipients at risk of TB disease. However, tuberculosis may still occur despite LTBI treatment. Hepatotoxicity associated with LTBI therapy is infrequent, although more commonly observed among liver recipients.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Active disease and latent infection in a renal transplant cohort

AIM

Our aim was threefold: first, to determine the incidence of active TB in our cohort, second to investigate the risk factors for active TB and third, to understand current screening practices. The ultimate goal was to use our findings to inform development of local and national guidelines.

METHODS

The records of all adult patients who underwent renal transplantation at our centre from 2005 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to assess current screening practices, the risks for and burden of active TB.

RESULTS

A total of 660 individuals underwent renal transplantation during this period, totalling 3647 person years of follow up. Two patients were diagnosed with active TB after renal transplant, resulting in an incidence of 55 per 100 000 person-years. Of 656 transplant recipients, 102 (15.5%) were born in high TB incidence countries and 89 (13.5%) had an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) at any point. Individuals born in high TB risk countries had a much higher incidence of active TB (353 per 100 000 person-years). Ten individuals had positive IGRA tests, of whom two were treated for active TB, two received chemoprophylaxis and six were not treated.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of formal guidelines, IGRA-based screening for LTBI was infrequently performed. Our data suggest that screening and treatment of renal transplant recipients born in high incidence countries is an important preventive measure.

Influence of epidemiology, immunosuppressive regimens, clinical presentation, and treatment on kidney transplant outcomes of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis: A retrospective cohort analysis

Tuberculosis (TB) mortality is high among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Although local epidemiology is an important factor, diagnostic/therapeutic challenges and immunosuppressive therapy (ISS) may influence outcomes. We analyzed the cumulative incidence (CumI) of TB in KT recipients receiving a variety of ISS with long-term follow-up. Our retrospective single-center cohort study included all KT procedures performed between January 1, 1998, and August 31, 2014, with follow-up until August 31, 2014. Induction therapy was based on perceived immunological risk; maintenance ISS included prednisone and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolic acid (MPA) or mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi). Thirty-four patients received belatacept/MPA. KT was performed on 11 453 patients and followed for 1989 (IQR 932 to 3632) days. Among these, 152 patients were diagnosed with TB (CumI 1.32%). Median time from KT to TB was 18.8 (IQR 7.2 to 60) months, with 59% of patients diagnosed after the first year. Unadjusted analysis revealed an increasing confidence interval (CI) of TB (0.94% CNI/AZA vs 1.6% CNI/MPA [HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.34, P = .009] vs 2.85% CNI/mTORi [HR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.49 to 4.32, P < .001] vs 14.7% belatacept/MPA [HR = 13.14, 95% CI = 5.27 to 32.79, P < .001]). Thirty-seven (24%) patients died, and 39 (25.6%) patients experienced graft loss. Cytomegalovirus infection (P = .02) and definitive ISS discontinuation (P < .001) were associated with death. Rejection (P = .018) and ISS discontinuation (P = .005) occurred with graft loss. TB occurred at any time after KT and was influenced by ISS.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the infectious diseases community of practice of the American Society of Transplantation

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of tuberculosis in the pre- and post-transplant period. The challenges of screening for both latent and active TB in the setting of transplantation are reviewed. The use of interferon gamma release assays for detection of latent tuberculosis is discussed and compared to tuberculin skin testing. Given the limitations of both testing modality, it is important to consider exposure history and chest imaging. The clinical manifestations of active tuberculosis in transplantation are covered. New recommendations for treatment of latent tuberculosis and active tuberculosis are included.

Positivity rate of interferon-γ release assays for estimating the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in renal transplant recipients in Japan

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of reactivating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developing active tuberculosis. QuantiFERON^®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) has two TB-specific antigens tubes (TB1 and TB2). TB1 elicits CD4 T-cell response, and TB2 elicits both CD4 and CD8 T-cells responses, with expected increased sensitivity. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of LTBI in renal transplant recipients in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional study by using two interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), QFT-Plus and T-SPOT^®.TB (TSPOT). One hundred thirty-five recipients were prospectively enrolled. The median age was 49 years (range: 20 to 79). The positivity rates of QFT-Plus and TSPOT were 5.9% (95%CI 3.0-11.3) and 3.7% (95%CI 1.6-8.4), respectively, with no significant difference. The concordance rate was 95.5% (κ coefficient, 0.76). Age of 60 years and higher was related to the higher positivity rate in both QFT-Plus and TSPOT. The positivity rates of TB1 and TB2 were 5.1% (95%CI 2.5-10.2) and 5.9% (95%CI 3.0-11.2), respectively, with no significant difference. The concordance rate was 99.3% (κ coefficient, 0.93). TB2 did not show a higher positivity rate compared with TB1. The estimated prevalence of LTBI by using the both IGRAs was 3.7-5.9% in renal transplant recipients. These results were equivalent to the IGRAs positivity rate in the general Japanese population, even under the condition of immunosuppressive therapy. In consideration of the higher risk of developing active TB from LTBI, we can use both IGRAs as acceptable tools for LTBI diagnosis in renal transplant recipients.

Prevalence of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in renal transplant recipients

Objective:

To estimate the prevalence of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in renal transplant recipients and to assess sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical associations with positive tuberculin skin test (TST) results.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent renal transplantation at the Renal Transplant Center of the Federal University of Minas Gerais Hospital das Clínicas, located in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. We included renal transplant recipients who underwent the TST between January 2011 and July 2013. If the result of the first TST was negative, a second TST was administered. Bivariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with positive TST results.

Results:

The sample included 216 patients. The prevalence of LTBI was 18.5%. In the multivariate analysis, history of contact with a tuberculosis case and preserved graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were associated with positive TST results. TST induration increased by 5.8% from the first to the second test, which was considered significant (p = 0.012).

Conclusions:

The prevalence of LTBI was low in this sample of renal transplant recipients. The TST should be administered if renal graft function is preserved. A second TST should be administered if the first TST is negative.

Management of Infection in Patients With Kidney Transplant

With the pervasive nature of chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is likely to continue to increase in the coming years. There are many infectious risks related to kidney transplant, including reactivation of latent infections, surgical complications, infectious risks related to immunosuppression, and nosocomial and community-acquired infections. These are described classically via timeline with early infections (first month), middle (1 to 6 months), and late (after 6 months). Kidney transplant patients may suffer from infections secondary to a vast array of organisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Certain infections, particularly viral infections such as cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and BK virus, may portend acute and chronic implications of the infection and its subsequent impact on graft function. Critical care physicians and nephrologists caring for patients with a renal transplant must understand the broad array of possible infections, atypical presentations, and nuanced implications for appropriate evaluation and subsequent therapy, combined with the need for possible prophylaxis and/or suppression. Multidisciplinary teams, including transplant physicians and infectious diseases physicians, are encouraged strongly.

A practical approach to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in liver transplant recipients in a low-prevalence area

Solid organ transplant candidates/recipients are at risk of mycobacterial infections. Although guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis are available for solid organ transplant recipients, limited guidance focuses on end-stage liver disease or liver transplant recipients who require management in a referral center. Therapeutic challenges arise from direct antituberculosis drug-related hepatotoxicity, and substantial metabolic interactions between immunosuppressive and antituberculosis drugs. Another issue is the optimal timing of therapy with regards to the time of transplantation. This review focuses on the importance of tuberculosis screening with immunological tests, challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis, as well as risk assessment for active tuberculosis in the critical peri-liver transplantation period. We detail therapeutic adjustments required for the management of antituberculosis drugs in latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis, particularly when concomitantly using rifampicin and immunosuppressive drugs.

Management and diagnosis of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients: Expert survey and updated review. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 2018;11:37-46. [PMID: 31720390 PMCID: PMC6830179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2018.04.001]

Background : Optimal screening and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients is necessary to prevent morbidity and mortality. Methods : We conducted a cross-sectional survey of TB and transplant experts across the United States reviewing the clinical practice preferences on key management issues related to LTBI and TB in SOT candidates and recipients. Results : Thirty TB and 13 SOT experts were surveyed (response rate = 53.8%). Both groups agreed that tuberculin skin test (TST) and chest x-ray screening in SOT candidates was useful (78.6% and 84.6%, respectively). TST after SOT was not useful for most transplant experts and TB experts (0% vs. 32.1%, respectively), but both groups were split on usefulness of interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) in SOT recipients (42.9% TB experts vs. 46.2% SOT experts). Most experts recommend LTBI treatment prior to SOT if close monitoring is assured (82.1% TB experts vs. 76.9% transplant experts). LTBI treatment with isoniazid was preferred for patients on calcineurin inhibitors. Evaluation for suspected TB in SOT recipients varied, but most TB experts favored sputum testing (88.9%) whereas most transplant experts favored bronchoscopic testing (69.2%). Preferred TB treatment regimens in SOT recipients were similar to regimens recommended for immunocompetent patients. Conclusions : Most TB and transplant experts recommend evaluation and treatment for LTBI in SOT candidates. Liver transplant candidates, however, should only be treated if close monitoring can be assured and after consulting with a hepatologist. Practice preferences varied regarding the initial diagnostic approach for suspected TB in SOT recipients; however, most experts agreed that SOT recipients should receive similar treatments as immunocompetent patients.

Pneumonia in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients despite enhanced facilities for perioperative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographic characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of renal transplant recipients with pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of all renal transplant recipients from January 2010 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and patients diagnosed with pneumonia according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were evaluated. Pneumonia was classified as community acquired or nosocomial. Patient demographics, microbiologic findings, need for intensive care/mechanical ventilation over the course of treatment, and information about clinical follow-up and mortality were all recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen (13.4%) of 134 renal transplant recipients had 25 pneumonia episodes within the study period. More than half (56%) of the pneumonia episodes developed within the first 6 months of transplant, whereas 44% developed after 6 months (all > 1 year). Eight cases (32%) were considered nosocomial pneumonia, and 17 (68%) were considered community-acquired pneumonia. Bacteria were the most common cause of pneumonia (28%), and fungi ranked second (8%). No viral or mycobacterial agents were detected. No patients required prolonged mechanical ventilation. No statistically significant difference was found in the need for intensive care or regarding mortality between patients with nosocomial and community-acquired pneumonia. Two patients (11%) died, and all remaining patients recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirmed that pneumonia after renal transplant is not a rare complication but a significant cause of morbidity. Long-term and close follow-up for pneumonia is necessary after renal transplant.

Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient

These guidelines cover the care of patients from the period following kidney transplantation until the transplant is no longer working or the patient dies. During the early phase prevention of acute rejection and infection are the priority. After around 3-6 months, the priorities change to preservation of transplant function and avoiding the long-term complications of immunosuppressive medication (the medication used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection). The topics discussed include organization of outpatient follow up, immunosuppressive medication, treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and prevention of complications. The potential complications discussed include heart disease, infection, cancer, bone disease and blood disorders. There is also a section on contraception and reproductive issues.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and AD depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Poor predictability of QuantiFERON-TB assay in recipients and donors for tuberculosis development after kidney transplantation in an intermediate-TB-burden country

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection after kidney transplantation (KT). The QuantiFERON-TB-Gold In-Tube test (QFT) is widely used for assessing latent TB; however, it is currently unclear whether the pre-KT QFT of the recipient and donor can predict post-KT TB.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received KT between January 2009 and December 2015 at Seoul National University Hospital. The QFT was performed in 458 KT recipients and 239 paired living donors, and 138 KT recipients underwent both the QFT and tuberculin skin test (TST). After excluding 12 patients diagnosed as having clinically latent TB, we evaluated whether the QFT of the recipient and donor was predictive for new-onset active TB after KT.

RESULTS

The QFT was positive in 101 (22.1%) recipients and associated with clinically latent TB before KT (P < 0.05). However, agreement between the TST and QFT was poor (κ = 0.327). Post-KT TB occurred in 1 of 95 recipients with a positive QFT, and 2 cases of TB occurred among 351 patients with a negative or indeterminate QFT. The incidence of TB was 242 cases/100,000 person-years among 446 KT recipients with a median follow-up of 30.2 months. The QFT of recipients could not predict post-KT TB in Poisson regression analysis (relative risk [RR], 1.847; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.168-20.373; P = 0.616). Of 234 living donor-recipient pairs, the QFT of the recipient (RR, 5.012; 95% CI, 0.301-83.430; P = 0.261) and QFT of the donor (RR, 1.758; 95% CI, 0.106-29.274; P = 0.694) could not predict post-KT TB.

CONCLUSION

The QFT of recipients or living donors pre-KT cannot predict the short-term development of post-KT TB in an intermediate TB-burden country.

Disseminated Mycobacterium tuberculosis following renal transplant with alemtuzumab induction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis presents unique challenges in the peritransplant period. Here, we describe a case of disseminated tuberculosis following renal transplantation with alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression in a patient with remotely treated pulmonary tuberculosis and ongoing risk factors for re-infection. We also review the available literature regarding the prevalence of tuberculosis infection following solid organ transplant and management of high-risk patients, including the role for isoniazid preventative therapy.

Tuberculosis and chronic kidney disease: an emerging global syndemic

The link between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and tuberculosis (TB) has been known for more than 40 years, but the interaction between these 2 diseases is still poorly understood. Dialysis and renal transplant patients appear to be at a higher risk of TB, in part related to immunosuppression along with socioeconomic, demographic, and comorbid factors. Meanwhile, TB screening and diagnostic test performance is suboptimal in the CKD population, and there is limited evidence to guide protocols. Given the increasing prevalence of CKD in TB endemic areas, a merging of CKD and TB epidemics could have significant public health implications, especially in low- to middle-income countries such as India and China, that are experiencing rapid increases in CKD prevalence and account for more than one-third of global TB prevalence. To begin addressing TB-CKD, a clear understanding of the relationship between these 2 conditions needs to be established, and consistent, evidence-based screening and treatment guidelines need to be developed.

Updates on the risk factors for latent tuberculosis reactivation and their managements

The preventive treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is of great importance for the elimination and control of tuberculosis (TB) worldwide, but existing screening methods for LTBI are still limited in predicting the onset of TB. Previous studies have found that some high-risk factors (including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), organ transplantation, silicosis, tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers, close contacts and kidney dialysis) contribute to a significantly increased TB reactivation rate. This article reviews each risk factor's association with TB and approaches to address those factors. Five regimens are currently recommended by the World Health Organization, and no regimen has shown superiority over others. In recent years, studies have gradually narrowed down to the preventive treatment of LTBI for high-risk target groups, such as silicosis patients, organ-transplantation recipients and HIV-infected patients. This review discusses regimens for each target group and compares the efficacy of different regimens. For HIV patients and transplant recipients, isoniazid monotherapy is effective in treating LTBI, but for others, little evidence is available at present.

Mycobacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Mycobacterial infections represent a growing challenge for solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). The adverse effects of tuberculosis (TB) therapy present a major difficulty, due to the interactions with immunosuppressive drugs and direct drug toxicity. While TB may be donor-transmitted or community-acquired, it usually develops at a latent infection site in the recipient. Pre-transplant prevention efforts will improve transplant outcomes and avoid the complications associated with post-transplant diagnosis and treatment. The present review and consensus manuscript is based on the updated published information and expert recommendations. The current data about epidemiology, diagnosis, new regimens for the treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI), the experience with rifamycins for the treatment of active TB in the post-transplant period and the experience with isoniazid for LTBI in the liver transplant population, are also reviewed. We attempt to provide useful recommendations for each transplant period and problem concerning mycobacterial infections in SOT recipients.

Seizures in an immunocompromised adolescent: a case report

Introduction

Tuberculosis is a progressive and disabling infection predominantly seen in low-income and middle-income countries. Immunocompromised patients are at a higher risk of contracting tuberculosis than the healthy population. The presentation may also be atypical, leading to delay in diagnosis. We report the first case of tuberculous cerebral vasculitis presenting with epilepsia partialis continua.

Case presentation

A 17-year-old adolescent boy of Sri Lankan Moor heritage was taking long-term immunosuppressants for nephrotic syndrome. He presented to hospital with focal fits affecting his left arm. He later developed choreiform movements of the same arm, progressing to epilepsia partialis continua and weakness. The gradually evolving focal neurological signs and underlying immunosuppression raised the possibility of localized cerebral infection or inflammation. Analysis of his cerebrospinal fluid showed lymphocytosis with normal cellular morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of progressive vasculitic infarctions of the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. There was no evidence of active autoimmune or viral disease on hematological investigations, but molecular amplification detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis in his cerebrospinal fluid. Although our patient had been established on isoniazid preventive treatment for eight months before the episode, tuberculosis was nonetheless considered to be the most likely cause of the cerebral vasculitis. He was treated with a trial of anti-tuberculosis treatment, including streptomycin and adjunctive steroids, and made an uneventful recovery.

Conclusion

Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for tuberculosis infection in patients with compromised immunity and other risk factors. The pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning cerebral vasculitis and epilepsia partialis continua are not completely understood. The efficacy of isoniazid prophylaxis in patients with immune suppression warrants further study. We present a regimen that successfully treated tuberculous cerebral vasculitis.

Transplantation in the tropics: lessons on prevention and management of tropical infectious diseases

Tropical infectious diseases (IDs) remain a rare complication in transplant recipients even in tropical settings, but this topic has become increasingly important during the last decade due to multiple factors. Interestingly, non-tropical countries report most of the experiences with tropical diseases. The reported experience from non-endemic regions, however, does not always reflect the experience of endemic areas. Most of the guidelines and recommendations in the literature may not be applicable in tropical settings due to logistical difficulties, cost, and lack of proven benefit. In addition, certain post-transplant prevention measures, as prophylaxis and reducing exposure risk, are not feasible. Nonetheless, risk assessment and post-transplant management of tropical IDs in tropical areas should not be neglected, and clinicians need to have a higher clinical awareness for tropical ID occurring in this population. Herein, we review the more significant tropical ID in transplant patients, focusing on relevant experience reported by tropical settings.

[Spinal tuberculosis in renal transplant complicated by systemic fungal infection]

En transplantation, les complications infectieuses sont fréquentes et de diagnostic souvent délicat. Elles peuvent coexister chez le transplanté rénal rendant leur diagnostic encore plus difficile. Le but de ce cas clinique est de discuter les difficultés diagnostiques et de surveillance de deux types de pathologies assez fréquentes chez le transplanté rénal, qui sont la tuberculose et la mycose, à travers l’observation clinique d’une patiente de 24 ans transplantée rénale qui présente une spondylodiscite tuberculeuse et qui développe secondairement une septicémie à Candida non albicans à point de départ urinaire dont le seul point d’appel est la fièvre post opératoire.

Selecting suitable solid organ transplant donors: Reducing the risk of donor-transmitted infections

Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.

American Society of Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire 2013: transplantation

The nephrology quiz and questionnaire remains an extremely popular session for attendees of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology. As in past years, the conference hall was overflowing with interested audience members. Topics covered by expert discussants included electrolyte and acid-base disorders, glomerular disease, ESRD/dialysis, and transplantation. Complex cases representing each of these categories along with single best answer questions were prepared by a panel of experts. Before the meeting, program directors of United States nephrology training programs answered questions through an Internet-based questionnaire. A new addition to the nephrology quiz and questionnaire was participation in the questionnaire by nephrology fellows. To review the process, members of the audience test their knowledge and judgment on a series of case-oriented questions prepared and discussed by experts. Their answers are compared in real time using audience response devices with the answers of nephrology fellows and training program directors. The correct and incorrect answers are then briefly discussed after the audience responds, and the results of the questionnaire are displayed. This article recapitulates the session and reproduces its educational value for the readers of CJASN. Enjoy the clinical cases and expert discussions.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing post solid organ transplant tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection as a result of immunosuppression caused inadvertently by medical treatment. Tuberculosis (TB) is a challenging infection to manage among organ transplant recipients that can be transmitted from infected people or triggered from latent infection. Organ transplant recipients have been reported to be up to 300 times more likely to develop TB than the general population. Consensus about the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB has not been achieved.

OBJECTIVES

This review assessed the benefits and harms of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register up to 30 April 2013 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE and handsearching conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared antibiotic prophylaxis with a placebo or no intervention for recipients of solid organ transplants were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. We derived risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three studies (10 reports) that involved 558 kidney transplant recipients which met our inclusion criteria. All studies were conducted in countries that have high prevalence of TB (India and Pakistan), and investigated isoniazid, an oral antibacterial drug. Control in all studies was no antibiotic prophylaxis. Prophylactic administration of isoniazid reduced the risk of developing TB post-transplant (3 studies, RR 0.35 95% CI 0.14 to 0.89), and there was no significant effect on all-cause mortality (2 studies, RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.78). There was however substantial risk of liver damage (3 studies, RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.22 to 6.17).Reporting of methodological quality parameters was incomplete in all three studies. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as suboptimal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Isoniazid prophylaxis for kidney transplant recipients reduced the risk of developing TB post-transplant. Kidney transplant recipients in settings that have high prevalence of TB should receive isoniazid during the first year following transplant. There is however, significant risk of liver damage, particularly among those who are hepatitis B or C positive. Further studies are needed among recipients of other solid organ transplants and in settings with low prevalence of TB to determine the benefits and harms of anti-TB prophylaxis in those populations.

Managing latent tuberculosis in UK renal transplant units: how does practice compare with published guidance?

Renal transplantation significantly increases the risk of active tuberculosis (TB) in individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI). UK transplant recipients are often born in TB endemic areas. Using a self-completed questionnaire, we evaluated how the 23 UK renal transplant units' LTBI management compared with recently published national guidance. Three-quarters had a management protocol, but only one-third of these were in line with the guidance. Interferon-gamma release assays were rarely used to confirm LTBI. Almost half of the units prescribed LTBI treatment at the wrong dose or duration. We conclude that units should develop local protocols in line with evidence-based guidance. This must be in a format that enables national audit programmes and quality improvement to be routinely performed.

Constrictive pericarditis in a post-renal transplant patient: a case report

Introduction

Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication in the post–renal transplant period. It poses a diagnostic dilemma even in the modern era. Its incidence is not known and tuberculosis is implicated in some of the cases.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old Sri Lankan man, in the sixth year of transplant presented with resistant ascites, shortness of breath and elevated creatinine from the baseline. Pre-transplant he was empirically treated for tuberculosis pericarditis and was on isoniazid prophylaxis for 1 year following transplantation. Two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization confirmed the diagnosis, and pericardiectomy was performed, which resulted in full resolution of the symptoms as well as the graft function. The histology or bacteriology failed to demonstrate features suggestive of tuberculosis in the surgical specimen.

Conclusion

In constrictive pericarditis, a causative factor is difficult to find. Isoniazid prophylaxis shows benefit in preventing tuberculosis-associated constrictive pericarditis.

Infectious Complications of Transplantation

Post-transplant infection is a common cause of graft deterioration, morbidity and mortality. It is also responsible for delayed discharge, multiple, often prolonged admissions and thus a significant clinical challenge. Infections can be donor derived, pre-existing in the recipient, nosocomial and opportunistic. For each of these categories, it is often possible to significantly reduce hazard and thus the adverse consequences by first identifying patients at high risk. As always, clinical vigilance is vital, but equally important is the establishment of robust clinical systems for prevention, screening and rapid treatment.

Neurologic complications in renal transplantation

Neurologic complications following kidney transplant are more common than in the general population with the reported incidence around 10-21%. Need for multiple drugs, decreased cellular immunity, accelerated atherosclerotic disease, and frequency of metabolic abnormalities are the most common predisposing factors for neurologic abnormalities. Neurologic side-effects of calcineurin inhibitors range from mild tremors to paraplegia or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and are generally reversible by lowering the dose or complete discontinuation of the drug when possible. Clinical presentation of central nervous system infection in transplant recipients can be different from the normal population as the anti-inflammatory effects of immunosuppressive therapy may obscure signs of meningeal inflammation and changes in the level of consciousness may be subtle. Bacterial infections remain the most common infections but unusual pathogens figure prominently in the differential diagnosis. The most frequent malignancies of the brain are lymphomas and metastatic tumors which are for the most part, de novo malignancies from immunosuppression. Decreasing immunosuppression is almost always a part of treating malignancy. The prevalence of stroke is reported to be around 8% with age>40 years, diabetic nephropathy as the underlying cause of end-stage kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease being the strongest predictors.

Results of implementation of preventive recommendations for tuberculosis after renal transplantation in an endemic area

This retrospective cohort study assessed the results of the implementation of preventive recommendations for tuberculosis (TB) among renal transplant recipients in an endemic area (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Subjects were defined as at high risk for TB if they had latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), reported recent close contact with individuals with TB or received a graft from a donor with LTBI. A 6-month course of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) was targeted to high-risk subjects. The study end point was TB confirmed by culture. Altogether, 535 patients were included. Median follow-up was 59 months. The overall cumulative incidence of TB was 2.1% while among the 274 patients in whom the preventive protocol was fully implemented, the incidence was only 0.7%. The incidence of TB among 75 high-risk recipients not treated with isoniazid (7%) was significantly higher than that observed in 209 untreated low-risk patients (1%, p = 0.006) and in 65 high-risk subjects that received IPT (no case, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the implementation of preventive recommendations for TB in an endemic area allowed the appropriate discrimination between high- and low-risk renal transplant recipients and was associated with long-term reduction in the incidence of this complication among high-risk subjects.

Challenging issues in tuberculosis in solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for opportunistic infections including tuberculosis. Although guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis and active tuberculosis are available, there remain a number of clinical areas with limited guidance. We discuss challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis in SOT candidates and recipients who reside in low-tuberculosis-prevalence areas. We discuss the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in SOT candidates/recipients using tuberculin skin tests and interferon-γ release assays and risk stratification of SOT candidates/recipients that would identify individuals at high risk for latent tuberculosis despite negative test results. Through a careful review of posttransplant tuberculosis cases, we identify a history of treated tuberculosis in SOT recipients as a risk factor for development of posttransplant active tuberculosis. Finally, we include comparisons of recommendations by several large transplant organizations and identify areas for future research.

Use of rifabutin for the treatment of a latent tuberculosis infection in a patient after solid organ transplantation

Latent tuberculosis infection is an important problem for solid organ transplant recipients because of the frequency of its occurrence and its potential for reactivation. Because of the high mortality rate associated with active tuberculosis infections in transplant recipients, guidelines from the American Thoracic Society recommend treatment for latent tuberculosis in this population. However, the choice of treatments is often difficult because liver transplant recipients may be more sensitive to isoniazid hepatotoxicity, and rifampin has significant drug interactions with the calcineurin inhibitors used for immunosuppression. Two prior case reports described success with the use of rifabutin, a rifampin alternative, as part of a multidrug treatment regimen for active tuberculosis in posttransplant patients; however, there is no prior literature describing any experience with rifabutin for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in the posttransplant setting. We present a summary of tacrolimus drug levels and corresponding dose requirements for a single posttransplant patient during the administration of 3 different latent tuberculosis drug regimens: rifampin alone, rifampin plus ketoconazole, and rifabutin. In this patient's case, rifabutin allowed the maintenance of adequate tacrolimus levels, although an approximate 2.5-fold increase in the dose was required. Rifampin alone was associated with inadequate immunosuppressant levels, and rifampin plus ketoconazole was associated with a problematically prolonged QT interval and concerns about inadequate tuberculosis treatment.

Pulmonary infections in transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematopoietic stem cell as well as solid-organ transplantation is being carried out with increasing frequency throughout the world. Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a common life-threatening complication faced by the transplant recipients. The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date information on pulmonary infections among the transplant recipients, especially emphasizing the endemicity of microorganisms, epidemiology, work-up of infections, and principles of their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

A lower respiratory tract infection such as pneumonia is the most frequent of all the infections and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Factors increasing the risk of pulmonary infections include surgical techniques, immune status, chemoradiotherapy, alloimmune mechanisms between the host and the graft, and the environment. A high degree of suspicion, computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, and flexible bronchoscopy are required in most to establish the diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Proper management of LRTI in transplant recipients requires a high degree of suspicion, thorough knowledge of the epidemiology and endemicity of the suspected organisms, CT scan of the chest, and expertise at bronchoscopy. Utmost teamwork among transplant physicians, infectious disease specialist, and bronchoscopist is essential.