Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Alemtuzumab Induction: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Predictors of Poor Outcome

Interferon-γ and its response are determinants of antibody-mediated rejection and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation

Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is an important cytokine in tissue homeostasis and immune response, while studies about it in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are very limited. This study aims to comprehensively elucidate the role of IFN-γ in ABMR after renal transplantation. In six renal transplantation cohorts, the IFN-γ responses (IFNGR) biological process was consistently top up-regulated in ABMR compared to stable renal function or even T cell-mediated rejection in both allografts and peripheral blood. According to single-cell analysis, IFNGR levels were found to be broadly elevated in most cell types in allografts and peripheral blood with ABMR. In allografts with ABMR, M1 macrophages had the highest IFNGR levels and were heavily infiltrated, while kidney resident M2 macrophages were nearly absent. In peripheral blood, CD14+ monocytes had the top IFNGR level and were significantly increased in ABMR. Immunofluorescence assay showed that levels of IFN-γ and M1 macrophages were sharply elevated in allografts with ABMR than non-rejection. Importantly, the IFNGR level in allografts was identified as a strong risk factor for long-term renal graft survival. Together, this study systematically analyzed multi-omics from thirteen independent cohorts and identified IFN-γ and IFNGR as determinants of ABMR and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation.

Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction

This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups.

Association of Circulating Anti-HLA Donor-Specific Antibodies and Their Characteristics, including C1q-Binding Capacity, in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Long-Term Renal Graft Outcomes

Post-transplant antihuman leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) monitoring in kidney transplant recipients remains unclear and is currently under investigation. The pathogenicity of anti-HLA DSAs is determined by antibody classes, specificity, mean fluorescent intensity (MFI), C1q-binding capacity, and IgG subclasses. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of circulating DSAs and their characteristics with renal allograft long-term outcomes. The study included 108 consecutive patients from our transplant center who underwent kidney allograft biopsy between November 2018 and November 2020, 3 to 24 months after kidney transplantation. At the time of biopsy, patients' sera were collected for analysis of anti-HLA DSAs. Patients were followed for a median time of 39.0 months (Q1-Q3, 29.8-45.0). Detection of anti-HLA DSAs at the time of biopsy (HR = 5.133, 95% CI 2.150-12.253, p = 0.0002) and their C1q-binding capacity (HR = 14.639, 95% CI 5.320-40.283, p ≤ 0.0001) were independent predictors of the composite of sustained 30% reduction from estimated glomerular filtration rate or death-censored graft failure. Identification of anti-HLA DSAs and their C1q-binding capacity could be useful in identifying kidney transplant recipients at risk for inferior renal allograft function and graft failure. Analysis of C1q is noninvasive, accessible, and should be considered in clinical practice in post-transplant monitoring.

Gut microbiota alterations associated with antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become the major challenge for kidney transplantation, and the efficacy of existing therapies was limited to prevent AMR. Increasing evidences have demonstrated the link between gut microbiota alterations and allograft outcome. However, there has been no comprehensive analysis to profile the gut microbiota associated with AMR after kidney transplantation. We performed this study to characterize the gut microbiota possibly associated with AMR. Fecal specimens were collected from 24 kidney transplantation recipients with AMR and 29 controls. DNA extracted from the specimens was processed for 16S rRNA gene sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. Gut microbial community of recipients with AMR was significantly different from that of controls based on unweighted (P = 0.001) and weighted (P = 0.02) UniFrac distances, and the bacterial richness (observed species: P = 0.0448; Chao1 index: P = 0.0450; ACE index: P = 0.0331) significantly decreased in the AMR group. LEfSe showed that 1 phylum, 5 classes, 7 families, and 10 genera were increased, whereas 1 class, 2 order, 3 families, and 4 genera were decreased in the AMR group. Specific taxa such as Clostridiales could be potentially used as biomarkers to distinguish the recipients with AMR from the controls (AUC = 0.77). PICRUSt analysis illustrated that 16 functional pathways were with significantly different abundances in the AMR and control groups. Our findings provide a foundation for further investigation on the role of gut microbiota in AMR after kidney transplantation, and potentially support novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic options for AMR. KEY POINTS: • Gut microbial community of kidney recipients with AMR was different from that of controls. • Clostridiales is a potential marker to distinguish recipients with AMR from controls.

Automated detection algorithm for C4d immunostaining showed comparable diagnostic performance to pathologists in renal allograft biopsy

A deep learning-based image analysis could improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in pathology work. Recently, we proposed a deep learning-based detection algorithm for C4d immunostaining in renal allografts. The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the algorithm by comparing pathologists' diagnoses and analyzing the associations of the algorithm with clinical data. C4d immunostaining slides of renal allografts were obtained from two different institutions (100 slides from the Asan Medical Center and 86 slides from the Seoul National University Hospital) and scanned using two different slide scanners. Three pathologists and the algorithm independently evaluated each slide according to the Banff 2017 criteria. Subsequently, they jointly reviewed the results for consensus scoring. The result of the algorithm was compared with that of each pathologist and the consensus diagnosis. Clinicopathological associations of the results of the algorithm with allograft survival, histologic evidence of microvascular inflammation, and serologic results for donor-specific antibodies were also analyzed. As a result, the reproducibility between the pathologists was fair to moderate (kappa 0.36-0.54), which is comparable to that between the algorithm and each pathologist (kappa 0.34-0.51). The C4d scores predicted by the algorithm achieved substantial concordance with the consensus diagnosis (kappa = 0.61), and they were significantly associated with remarkable microvascular inflammation (P = 0.001), higher detection rate of donor-specific antibody (P = 0.003), and shorter graft survival (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the deep learning-based C4d detection algorithm showed a diagnostic performance similar to that of the pathologists.

Risk Factors of Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Predictors of Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Antibody-mediated rejection is associated with higher rates of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Determining the risk factors of antibody-mediated rejection is vital for its prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate treatment, as these factors may be important in maintaining long-term graft survival in transplant recipients. In our study, we analyzed the risk factors of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients and the negative impact of antibody-mediated rejection on graft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed demographic and clinical data of 124 kidney transplant recipients (37 female [30%] and 87 male [70%] patients) who were diagnosed with antibody-mediated rejection at transplant biopsy. We compared graft outcomes of this patient cohort versus 75 kidney transplant recipients (24 female [32%] and 51 male [68%] patients) who were not diagnosed with antibody-mediated rejection.

RESULTS

Mean ages of patients with and without antibody-mediated rejection were 38.2 ± 13.6 and 34.4 ± 13.0 years, respectively. Mean ages of donors for patients with antibody-mediated rejection was significantly higher (48.0 ± 13.2 y) than for donors of patients without antibody-mediated rejection (47.1 ± 11.4 y; P < .05). Rate of graft loss was 15.3% in patients with antibody-mediated rejection; patients without antibody-mediated rejection had no graft loss (P < .05). Positive panel reactive antibody levels and blood transfusion before transplant were found to be risk factors of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. However, recipients who received tacrolimus had less antibody-mediated rejection episodes than recipients who received sirolimus or cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibody-mediated rejection is associated with high rates of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Avoiding blood transfusion, lowering panel reactive antibody levels, choosing younger donors, and using tacrolimus in high-risk kidney transplant recipients may reduce antibody-mediated rejection rates and provide better graft survival.

Role of de novo DQ donor-specific antibody in antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipient: A case study

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching plays an important role in determining the clinical outcome of renal transplantation. The development of donor specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA is associated with antibody mediated allograft tissue injury, poor outcome and rejection. The DQ-DSA develops in a denovo pattern and its unfavorable impact on renal transplantation has not yet been widely reported. We investigated the clinical significance of DQ-DSA in a patient diagnosed with hypertension, CKD stage V on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) for second renal transplant. The histocompatibility workup before the first transplant included low resolution HLA-A, B, DR typing of both patient and donor. HLA type of the patient was HLA-A*29, 68, HLAB*44, 44, DRB1*07, 11. HLA type of the donor was HLA-A*03, 68, HLA-B*39, 44, DRB1*07, 10 with a 3/6 match. The HLA antibody screen and complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC) were found to be negative. No therapeutic plasma exchanges (TPE) were done during stay and post-transplant the patient was on triple immunosuppressant therapy. After four years the patient was diagnosed with recurrent membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and second renal transplant was planned, therefore, histocompatibility workup was initiated. HLA antibody screen was found to be positive for HLA class II. Initially only HLA-A, B, DR typing was performed and that too only low resolution, further, high resolution HLA typing was done for HLA-DR and DQ to rule out if these antibodies are de-novo DQ/DR DSA. We analyzed that the patient had developed de-novo DSA against HLA-DRB1* 10:01 (DR10), MFI-2374 and DQB1*06:01 (DQ6), MFI-15315. This study suggests the role of DQ antibodies in determining the graft survival and to highlight the need of HLA DQ typing as a routine of the diagnostic work-up in a solid organ transplant.

Regulatory B cells and advances in transplantation

The effects of B cell subsets with regulatory activity on the immune response to an allograft have evoked increasing interest. Here, we summarize the function and signaling of regulatory B cells (Bregs) and their potential effects on transplantation. These cells are able to suppress the immune system directly via ligand-receptor interactions and indirectly by secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, particularly IL-10. In experimental animal models, the extensively studied IL-10-producing B cells have shown unique therapeutic advantages in the transplant field. In addition, adoptive transfer of B cell subsets with regulatory activity may reveal a new approach to prolonging allograft survival. Recent clinical observations on currently available therapies targeting B cells have revealed that Bregs play an important role in immune tolerance and that these cells are expected to become a new target of immunotherapy for transplant-related diseases.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis in renal allograft related to antibody-mediated rejection: A case report and literature review

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a rare condition which can rapidly progress to sepsis and multiple organ failure with high mortality. We experienced a rare case of EPN in a renal allograft related to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The patient received a deceased donor kidney transplant due to end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetes mellitus. Cross-match test was negative but she had remote history of anti-HLA-A2 antibody corresponding with the donor HLA. Surgery concluded without any major events. Anti-thymoglobulin was given perioperatively for induction. She was compliant with her immunosuppressive medications making urine of 2 L/d with serum creatinine of 1.9 mg/dL at discharge on post-operative day (POD) 6. She did well until POD 14 when she presented to the clinic with features of sepsis, pain over the transplanted kidney area and decline in urine volume with elevated serum creatinine. CT revealed extensive gas throughout the transplanted kidney. Renal scan revealed non-functional transplant kidney with no arterial flow. Based on these findings, a decision to perform transplant nephrectomy was made. At laparotomy, the kidney was completely necrotic. Pathology showed non-viable kidney parenchyma with the tubules lacking neutrophilic casts suggestive of ischemic necrosis. Donor-specific antibody (DSA) returned positive with high intensity anti-HLA-A2 antibody. This is the first case of early EPN in allograft considered to have occurred as a result of thrombotic ischemia secondary to AMR. This case suggests consideration of perioperative anti-B-cell and/or anti-plasma cell therapies for historical DSA and strict post-operative follow-up in immunologically high-risk recipients to detect early signs of rejection and avoid deleterious outcomes.

Terasaki Epitope Mismatch Burden Predicts the Development of De Novo DQ Donor-Specific Antibodies and are Associated With Adverse Allograft Outcomes

BACKGROUND

De novo DQ donor-specific antibody (DSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss. Given the lack of effective treatment of de novo DQ DSA, their prevention is vital if there is to be an improvement of long-term allograft survival. Using the HLA Matchmaker program, DQ epitope matching has been shown to be superior to HLA antigen mismatching in predicting de novo DQ DSA development. Whether DQ epitopes determined by Terasaki may more accurately predict de novo DQ development over HLA antigen matching is not known.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the immunogenicity of the different HLA antigens, DQB1 alleles and DQB1 Teraskai epitopes (TerEp) in a large cohort of renal transplant recipients, by comparing patient mismatches with de novo DSA development.

RESULTS

Patients mismatched at a DQB1 allele were at significantly higher risk of developing de novo DSA compared with other mismatched HLA antigens. Patients mismatched at the DQ7 allele appear to be at specific risk. For patients mismatched at a single DQB1 allele, the risk of de novo DQ DSA development increases with the number of TerEp mismatches. However, the immunogenicity of the different DQ TerEps does not appear to be equal. Patients who develop antibodies against TerEps are at increased risk of adverse allograft outcomes, specifically antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Epitope mismatch burden, determined by TerEps, helps predict risk of de novo DQ DSA development and offers an alternative approach to predict an alloimmune response.

Dynamic Prognostic Score to Predict Kidney Allograft Survival in Patients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

No tool is available for the early assessment of response to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) therapies in kidney allograft recipients. This study was designed to define a dynamic composite prognostic ABMR score to predict kidney allograft survival, integrating the disease characteristics at diagnosis and the response to treatment. Among 1978 kidney recipients who underwent transplant between 2008 and 2014, we included 278 patients diagnosed with active ABMR and receiving standard treatment, including plasma exchange, intravenous Ig, and rituximab. Patients were prospectively assessed at diagnosis and after treatment for clinical data, histologic characteristics (allograft biopsy specimen), and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). The dynamic ABMR prediction model included GFR (P<0.001) and presence of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (P=0.003) at diagnosis and changes in GFR (P<0.001), peritubular capillaritis Banff score (P=0.002), and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (P<0.001) after treatment. Overall, this model showed good calibration and discrimination (C-statistic=0.84). The ABMR prognostic score derived from the prediction model identified three risk strata with 6-year kidney allograft survival rates of 6.0% (high-risk group, n=40), 44.9% (intermediate-risk group, n=36), and 84.4% (low-risk group, n=202), and it provided greater net clinical benefit to patients than did considering them all to have the same level of risk of allograft loss. The performance of the ABMR prognostic score was validated in an independent cohort of 202 kidney recipients with ABMR (C-statistic=0.79). The ABMR prognostic score could be used to inform therapeutic decisions in clinical practice and for the design of clinical trials.

Overview of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Solid Organ Transplantation

Mechanisms of rejection, new pharmacologic approaches, and genomic medicine are major foci for current research in transplantation. It is hoped that these new agents and personalized immunosuppression will provide for less toxic regimens that are effective in preventing both acute and chronic allograft rejection. Until new agents are available, practitioners must use various combinations of currently approved agents to find the best regimens for improved long-term outcomes.

Crosstalk Between T and B Cells in the Germinal Center After Transplantation

Crosstalk between B and T cells in transplantation is increasingly recognized as being important in the alloimmune response. T cell activation of B cells occurs by a 3-stage pathway, culminating with costimulation signals. We review the distinct T cell subtypes required for B-cell activation and discuss the formation of the germinal center (GC) after transplantation, with particular reference to the repopulation of the GC after depletional induction, and the subsequent effect of immunosuppressive manipulation of T cell-B cell interactions. In addition, ectopic GCs are seen in transplantation, but their role is not fully understood. Therapeutic options to target T cell-B cell interactions are of considerable interest, both as immunosuppressive tools, and to aid in the further understanding of these important alloimmune mechanisms.

Proteasome Inhibitor Carfilzomib-Based Therapy for Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Pulmonary Allograft: Use and Short-Term Findings

We present this observational study of lung transplant recipients (LTR) treated with carfilzomib (CFZ)-based therapy for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of the lung. Patients were considered responders to CFZ if complement-1q (C1q)-fixing ability of their immunodominant (ID) donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antibody (DSA) was suppressed after treatment. Treatment consisted of CFZ plus plasma exchange and immunoglobulins. Fourteen LTRs underwent CFZ for 20 ID DSA AMR. Ten (71.4%) of LTRs responded to CFZ. DSA IgG mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fell from 7664 (IQR 3230-11 874) to 1878 (653-7791) after therapy (p = 0.001) and to 1400 (850-8287) 2 weeks later (p = 0.001). DSA C1q MFI fell from 3596 (IQR 714-14 405) to <30 after therapy (p = 0.01) and <30 2 weeks later (p = 0.02). Forced expiratory volume in 1s ( FEV₁ ) fell from mean 2.11 L pre-AMR to 1.92 L at AMR (p = 0.04). FEV₁ was unchanged after CFZ (1.91 L) and subsequently rose to a maximum of 2.13 L (p = 0.01). Mean forced expiratory flow during mid forced vital capacity (25-75) (FEF_25-75 ) fell from mean 2.5 L pre-AMR to 1.95 L at AMR (p = 0.01). FEF_25-75 rose after CFZ to 2.54 L and reached a maximum of 2.91 L (p = 0.01). Responders had less chronic lung allograft dysfunction or progression versus nonresponders (25% vs. 83%, p = 0.04). No deaths occurred within 120 days and 7 patients died post CFZ therapy of allograft failure. Larger prospective interventional studies are needed to further describe the benefit of CFZ-based therapy for pulmonary AMR.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic antibody injury is a serious threat to allograft outcomes and is therefore the center of active research. In the continuum of allograft rejection, the development of antibodies plays a critical role. In recent years, an increased recognition of molecular and histologic changes has provided a better understanding of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), as well as potential therapeutic interventions. However, several pathways are still unknown, which accounts for the lack of efficacy of some of the currently available agents that are used to treat rejection.

METHODS

We review the current diagnostic criteria for AMR; AMR paradigms; and desensitization, treatment, and prevention strategies.

RESULTS

Chronic antibody-mediated endothelial injury results in transplant glomerulopathy, manifested as glomerular basement membrane duplication, double contouring, or splitting. Clinical manifestations of AMR include proteinuria and a rise in serum creatinine. Current strategies for the treatment of AMR include antibody depletion with plasmapheresis (PLEX), immunoadsorption (IA), immunomodulation with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and T cell- or B cell-depleting agents. Some treatment benefits have been found in using PLEX and IA, and some small nonrandomized trials have identified some benefits in using rituximab and the proteasome inhibitor-based therapy bortezomib. More recent histologic follow-ups of patients treated with bortezomib have not shown significant benefits in terms of allograft outcomes. Furthermore, no specific treatment approaches have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Other agents used for more difficult rejections include bortezomib and eculizumab (an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody).

CONCLUSION

AMR is a fascinating field with ample opportunities for research and progress in the future. Despite the use of advanced techniques for the detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or non-HLA donor-specific antibodies, alloimmune response remains an important barrier for successful long-term allograft function. Treatment of AMR with currently available therapies has produced a variety of results, some of them suboptimal, precluding the development of standardized protocols. New therapies are promising, but randomized controlled trials are needed to find surrogate markers and improve the efficacy of therapy.

Clinical Significance of Pretransplant Donor-Specific Antibodies in the Setting of Negative Cell-Based Flow Cytometry Crossmatching in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Antibodies to donor-specific HLA antigens (donor-specific antibodies [DSA]) detected by single-antigen bead (SAB) analysis prior to kidney transplant have been associated with inferior graft outcomes. However, studies of pretransplant DSA, specifically in the setting of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) without desensitization therapy, are limited. Six hundred and sixty kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients with a negative pretransplant FCXM from September 2007 to August 2012 without desensitization therapy were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.2 years. All patients underwent cell-based FCXM and SAB analysis on current and historic sera prior to transplantation. One hundred and sixty-two patients (24.5%) had DSA detected prior to transplant. One-year acute rejection rates were similar in DSA-positive versus DSA-negative patients (15.4% vs. 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.18) and were higher in those with DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) greater than or equal to 3000 in multivariable analysis (p = 0.046). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 and 4 years was lower in the DSA(+) versus the DSA(-) group (p = 0.050 at 3 years) without an impact on 5-year death-censored graft survival (89.0% vs. 90.6%, respectively; p = 0.53). Timing (current or historic) of DSA detection did not alter these findings. In conclusion, pretransplant DSA in the setting of a negative FCXM confers minimal immunologic risk in the intermediate term, does not necessitate desensitization therapy and should not represent a barrier to renal transplant.

Review of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is a leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients, accounting for up to 60% of late graft failures. AbMR manifests as two distinct phenotypes: the first occurs in the immediate post-transplant period in sensitized patients; the second occurs in the late post-transplant period and has been associated with non-adherence to immunosuppression. The present review summarizes the current treatment options for AbMR, its clinical and economic burden, and approaches for reducing the risk of AbMR. While AbMR is typically refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, there are numerous other approaches focused on removal, inhibition or neutralization of donor-specific antibodies, or inhibition of complement-mediated allograft damage. AbMR treatment is generally expensive with one US study reporting costs of USD 49,000-155,000 per episode. However, leaving AbMR untreated puts patients at high risk of capillaritis, microangiopathy, necrosis and graft failure, which may ultimately result in much greater costs associated with a return to dialysis. Given the barriers to treatment, which include the high cost and the fact that pharmacologic treatments are currently used off-label, prevention of AbMR is important, with improvement in patient adherence to immunosuppression a key strategic approach that may be worthy of further evaluation.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma EMEA Limited.

Antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last five decades, the attention of nephrologists has focused on cellular rejection which was considered to be responsible for the early loss of function of the transplanted kidney. The use of new drugs in different combinations with steroids resulted in an improved short-term survival of the graft, which has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejections. The main problem now, however, is ensuring the long-term survival of the transplanted kidney. This has become the challenge of the new millennium.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current literature clearly focuses on donor-specific alloantibodies, directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antigens [donor-specific antibodies (DSA)], which have been shown to play an important role in graft dysfunction, longevity, and loss. To mitigate allograft loss due to antibodies, it is important to treat the source of antibody production, the plasma cells. Drugs used prior to 2007, such as Rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis, lack effects on these long-lived plasma cells. Their ability to remove DSA is incomplete and/or cost prohibitive. Since 2007, Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has been used to deplete plasma cells, thus eliminating the synthesis of DSA.

SUMMARY

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is common in patients with DSA and is associated with a poor prognosis. Novel medications that target each step of AMR pathogenesis have been produced and are successful when compared with more traditional therapies.

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.

Alemtuzumab induction and antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy improves graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to compare the incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) as well as graft and patient outcomes in KTRs who underwent induction with alemtuzumab versus rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study involving patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2009 and December 2011 after receiving induction therapy with either alemtuzumab or r-ATG. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early steroid withdrawal. Acute rejection was diagnosed using allograft biopsy.

RESULTS

Among the 108 study patients, 68 received alemtuzumab and 40 got r-ATG. There was a significantly higher incidence of AMR (15% vs 2.5%; P = .008) and similar incidence of ACR (4.4% vs 10%; P = .69) for alemtuzumab versus r-ATG groups. One-year serum creatinine levels (l.68 ± 0.8 mg/dL vs 1.79 ± 1.8 mg/dL; P = .66) as well as graft (91.1 ± 3.5% vs 94.5 ± 3.8%; P = .48) and patient (93.8 ± 3.0% vs 96.4 ± 3.5%; P = .92) survivals were similar for the alemtuzumab versus the r-ATG groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a higher incidence of AMR and similar incidence of ACR in KTRs who underwent induction with alemtuzumab compared with those who received r-ATG and were maintained on tacrolimus and MMF. This was despite a lower HLA mismatch in the alemtuzumab group. One-year graft survival, patient survival, and allograft function were similar. Inadequate B-cell suppression by alemtuzumab as well as altered phenotypic and functional properties of repopulating B cells could be contributing to heightened risk of AMR in these patients.

A refractory case of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection due to anti-HLA-DQ antibody in a kidney transplant patient

We herein report a refractory case of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to anti-HLA-DQ antibody in a kidney transplant patient. A 45-year-old man was admitted for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 1.8 mg/dL 3 years following primary kidney transplantation. Histological examination revealed moderate to severe inflammatory cell infiltration in the peritubular capillaries. Thorough laboratory examination showed that the patient had donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to DR9 and DQ9. Considering both the histological and laboratory findings, we diagnosed acute antibody-mediated rejection. The patient underwent 3 days of consecutive steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange. We also administered rituximab (200 mg/body). Six months after the treatment, a second allograft biopsy revealed the progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and persistence of mild peritubular capillaritis. Further analysis showed that the anti-DR9 antibodies had disappeared, but that the mean fluorescence intensity value of the anti-DQ9 antibodies had increased. Therefore, we repeated the plasma exchange and IVIG. Allograft function was stable throughout the course of treatment, and the S-Cr level remained at 1.8 mg/dL. This case report demonstrates the difficulty of treating AMR due to the presence of anti-DQ DSAbs and the necessity for subsequent therapies in refractory cases.

Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), also known as B-cell-mediated or humoral rejection, is a significant complication after kidney transplantation that carries a poor prognosis. Although fewer than 10% of kidney transplant patients experience AMR, as many as 30% of these patients experience graft loss as a consequence. Although AMR is mediated by antibodies against an allograft and results in histologic changes in allograft vasculature that differ from cellular rejection, it has not been recognized as a separate disease process until recently. With an improved understanding about the importance of the development of antibodies against allografts as well as complement activation, significant advances have occurred in the treatment of AMR. The standard of care for AMR includes plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin that remove and neutralize antibodies, respectively. Agents targeting B cells (rituximab and alemtuzumab), plasma cells (bortezomib), and the complement system (eculizumab) have also been used successfully to treat AMR in kidney transplant recipients. However, the high cost of these medications, their use for unlabeled indications, and a lack of prospective studies evaluating their efficacy and safety limit the routine use of these agents in the treatment of AMR in kidney transplant recipients.

Acute cellular rejection: impact of donor-specific antibodies and C4d

BACKGROUND

Mixed rejection in kidney transplantation consists of histologic and/or serological evidence of both cellular and humoral components. As it is not confined to a distinct category in the Banff classification, how to best manage these patients is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of morphological T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with a humoral component, defined as the presence of either DSA or C4d, compared with the outcome of pure TCMR.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 922 consecutive renal transplant recipients and analyzed patients with TCMR according to the evidence of a humoral component.

RESULTS

A total of 147 cases of morphological TCMR were analyzed. Of these, 92 (62.6%) had "pure" TCMR and 55 (37.4%) had "mixed" TCMR on the index biopsy. On univariant analysis, diffuse C4d (odds ratio [OR]=10.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.8-66.9, P=0.01) and DSA positivity at the time of index biopsy (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.2-6.6, P=0.02) were associated with allograft loss, whereas arteritis (OR=0.5, 95% CI=0.2-1.2, P=0.11) and glomerulitis (OR=0.9, 95% CI=0.4-2.1, P=0.8) were not. Arteritis was associated with subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (OR=4.9, 95% CI=1.1-20.8, P=0.03), and glomerulitis was associated with the development of transplant glomerulopathy (OR=10.7, 95% CI=3.1-37.1, P<0.01). On the multivariate analysis, only patients with C4d and DSA were at risk of graft failure (OR=4.9, 95% CI=2.0-12.0, P<0.01) in the medium term.

CONCLUSION

TCMR with a humoral component has a worse prognosis when compared with pure TCMR. As such, it is important to test for alloantibody in cases of morphological TCMR to optimize patient management. Such cases might benefit from more aggressive immunotherapy.

Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches

Advances in multimodal immunotherapy have significantly reduced acute rejection rates and substantially improved 1-year graft survival following renal transplantation. However, long-term (10-year) survival rates have stagnated over the past decade. Recent studies indicate that antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is among the most important barriers to improving long-term outcomes. Improved understanding of the roles of acute and chronic ABMR has evolved in recent years following major progress in the technical ability to detect and quantify recipient anti-HLA antibody production. Additionally, new knowledge of the immunobiology of B cells and plasma cells that pertains to allograft rejection and tolerance has emerged. Still, questions regarding the classification of ABMR, the precision of diagnostic approaches, and the efficacy of various strategies for managing affected patients abound. This review article provides an overview of current thinking and research surrounding the pathophysiology and diagnosis of ABMR, ABMR-related outcomes, ABMR prevention and treatment, as well as possible future directions in treatment.

Regulatory B cells: an exciting target for future therapeutics in transplantation

Transplantation is the preferred treatment for most end-stage solid organ diseases. Despite potent immunosuppressive agents, chronic rejection remains a real problem in transplantation. For many years, the predominant immunological focus of research into transplant rejection has been T cells. The pillar of immunotherapy in clinical practice is T cell-directed, which efficiently prevents acute T cell-mediated allograft rejection. However, the root of late allograft failure is chronic rejection and the humoral arm of the immune response now emerges as an important factor in transplantation. Thus, the potential effects of Abs and B cell infiltrate on transplants have cast B cells as major actors in late graft rejection. Consequently, a number of recent drugs target either B cells or plasma cells. However, immunotherapies, such as the anti-CD20 B cell-depleting antibody, can generate deleterious effects on the transplant, likely due to the deletion of beneficial population. The positive contribution of regulatory B (Breg) cells or B10 cells has been reported in the case of transplantation, mainly in mice models and highlights the primordial role that some populations of B cells can play in graft tolerance. Yet, this regulatory aspect remains poorly characterized in clinical transplantation. Thus, total B cell depletion treatments should be avoided and novel approaches should be considered that manipulate the different B cell subsets. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge on the link between Breg cells and grafts, and reports a number of data advising Breg cells as a new target for future therapeutic approaches.

Allorecognition pathways in transplant rejection and tolerance

With the advent of cellular therapies, it has become clear that the success of future therapies in prolonging allograft survival will require an intimate understanding of the allorecognition pathways and effector mechanisms that are responsible for chronic rejection and late graft loss.Here, we consider current understanding of T-cell allorecognition pathways and discuss the most likely mechanisms by which these pathways collaborate with other effector mechanisms to cause allograft rejection. We also consider how this knowledge may inform development of future strategies to prevent allograft rejection.Although both direct and indirect pathway CD4 T cells appear active immediately after transplantation, it has emerged that indirect pathway CD4 T cells are likely to be the dominant alloreactive T-cell population late after transplantation. Their ability to provide help for generating long-lived alloantibody is likely one of the main mechanisms responsible for the progression of allograft vasculopathy and chronic rejection.Recent work has suggested that regulatory T cells may be an effective cellular therapy in transplantation. Given the above, adoptive therapy with CD4 regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity is a rational first choice in attempting to attenuate the development and progression of chronic rejection; those with additional properties that enable inhibition of germinal center alloantibody responses hold particular appeal.

Acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft: incidence, risk factors and outcomes

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after pancreas transplantation is a recently identified entity. We describe the incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes after AMR, and the correlation of C4d immunostaining and donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the diagnosis of AMR. We retrospectively analyzed 162 pancreas transplants in 159 patients who underwent 94 pancreas allograft biopsies between 2006 and 2009. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for pancreas graft AMR. One-year rejection rates and survival after rejection were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. AMR occurred in 10% of patients by 1-year posttransplant. Multivariate risk factors identified for AMR include nonprimary simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant, primary solitary pancreas (PAN) transplant and race mismatch. After pancreas rejection, patient survival was 100% but 20% (8 of 41) of pancreas grafts failed within 1 year. Graft survival after acute cellular rejection (ACR), AMR and mixed rejection was similar. Of biopsies that stained >5% C4d, 80% were associated with increased Class I DSA. In summary, AMR occurs at a measurable rate after pancreas transplantation, and the diagnosis should be actively sought using C4d staining and DSA levels in patients with graft dysfunction, especially after nonprimary SPK and primary PAN transplantation.

Algorithms for the determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients

One of the major tasks of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) laboratories is the pretransplant determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches (UAM) in organ transplant recipients. HLA antigen specificities are determined against which the patient has circulating alloantibodies that are expected to harm the transplanted organ. Using the information on UAM, negative crossmatch (XM) prediction or 'virtual XM' is possible when a potential donor's complete HLA typing is available. Before the introduction of solid-phase antibody detection assays, UAM were determined using the complement-dependent cytotoxicity methodology. After the introduction of the single antigen bead technique, however, various UAM determination algorithms have emerged. In this report, six different laboratories worldwide present how they determine UAM in their collective of kidney transplant recipients in the pretransplant phase and proceed thereafter to transplantation.

Clinical relevance of antibody development in renal transplantation

The detection and characterization of anti-HLA antibodies and the clinical impact of their appearance following renal transplantation are areas of immense interest. In particular, de novo development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has been associated with acute and chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (AMR). Recently, methods for antibody detection have evolved remarkably from conventional cell-based assays to advanced solid phase systems. These systems have revolutionized the art of defining clinically relevant antibodies that are directed toward a renal graft. While anti-HLA DSAs have been widely associated with poor graft survival, the role of non-HLA antibodies, particularly those directed against endothelial cells, is beginning to be realized. Appreciation of the mechanisms underlying T cell recognition of alloantigens has generated great interest in the use of synthetic peptides to prevent graft rejection. Hopefully, continued progress in unraveling the molecular mechanisms of graft rejection and posttransplant monitoring of antibodies using highly sensitive testing systems will prove beneficial to immunological risk assessment and early prediction of renal allograft failure.

Preformed and de novo donor specific antibodies in visceral transplantation: long-term outcome with special reference to the liver

Despite improvement in early outcome, rejection particularly chronic allograft enteropathy continues to be a major barrier to long-term visceral engraftment. The potential role of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in 194 primary adult recipients. All underwent complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM) with pre- and posttransplant solid phase HLA-DSA assay in 156 (80%). Grafts were ABO-identical with random HLA-match. Liver was included in 71 (37%) allografts. Immunosuppression was tacrolimus-based with antilymphocyte recipient pretreatment in 150 (77%). CDC-XM was positive in 55 (28%). HLA-DSA was detectable before transplant in 49 (31%) recipients with 19 continuing to have circulating antibodies. Another 19 (18%) developed de novo DSA. Ninety percent of patients with preformed DSA harbored HLA Class-I whereas 74% of recipients with de novo antibodies had Class-II. Gender, age, ABO blood-type, cold ischemia, splenectomy and allograft type were significant DSA predictors. Preformed DSA significantly (p < 0.05) increased risk of acute rejection. Persistent and de novo HLA-DSA significantly (p < 0.001) increased risk of chronic rejection and associated graft loss. Inclusion of the liver was a significant predictor of better outcome (p = 0.004, HR = 0.347) with significant clearance of preformed antibodies (p = 0.04, OR = 56) and lower induction of de novo DSA (p = 0.07, OR = 24). Innovative multifaceted anti-DSA strategies are required to further improve long-term survival particularly of liver-free allografts.

Patterns of de novo allo B cells and antibody formation in chronic cardiac allograft rejection after alemtuzumab treatment

Even though the etiology of chronic rejection (CR) is multifactorial, donor specific antibody (DSA) is considered to have a causal effect on CR development. Currently the antibody-mediated mechanisms during CR are poorly understood due to lack of proper animal models and tools. In a clinical setting, we previously demonstrated that induction therapy by lymphocyte depletion, using alemtuzumab (anti-human CD52), is associated with an increased incidence of serum alloantibody, C4d deposition and antibody-mediated rejection in human patients. In this study, the effects of T cell depletion in the development of antibody-mediated rejection were examined using human CD52 transgenic (CD52Tg) mice treated with alemtuzumab. Fully mismatched cardiac allografts were transplanted into alemtuzumab treated CD52Tg mice and showed no acute rejection while untreated recipients acutely rejected their grafts. However, approximately half of long-term recipients showed increased degree of vasculopathy, fibrosis and perivascular C3d depositions at posttransplant day 100. The development of CR correlated with DSA and C3d deposition in the graft. Using novel tracking tools to monitor donor-specific B cells, alloreactive B cells were shown to increase in accordance with DSA detection. The current animal model could provide a means of testing strategies to understand mechanisms and developing therapeutic approaches to prevent chronic rejection.

De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with a significant risk of antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy

BACKGROUND

The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching in renal transplantation is well recognized, with HLA-DR compatibility having the greatest influence. De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) are the predominant HLA class II DSAb after transplantation. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence and outcomes after the development of DQ DSAbs along with the impact of class II HLA mismatch on their development.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 505 patients who received a renal-alone transplant between 2005 and 2010. We excluded patients who received an ABO- and HLA-incompatible allograft, which we defined as those with a positive crossmatch or preformed DSAbs detected by single-antigen beads only.

RESULTS

Of 505 patients, 92 (18.2%) developed DSAbs, with 50 (54.3%) of these 92 patients having DQ DSAbs. Patients who developed DQ DSAbs were at significant risk for antibody-mediated rejection, transplant glomerulopathy, and allograft loss (P<0.0001). Of 505 patients, 108 (21.4%) were matched at both the DR and DQ loci, 284 (56.2%) were mismatched at both loci, 38 (7.5%) were matched at DR alone, and 75 (14.9%) were matched at DQ alone. Patients mismatched at both DR and DQ were at risk for developing class II DSAbs when compared with those mismatched at either DR or DQ alone, P=0.001, and were at risk for antibody-mediated rejection, P=0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

DQ DSAbs are associated with inferior allograft outcomes. This study shows the importance of establishing the DQ match before transplantation to define immunologic risk.

The role of B cells in solid organ transplantation

The role of antibodies in chronic injury to organ transplants has been suggested for many years, but recently emphasized by new data. We have observed that when immunosuppressive potency decreases either by intentional weaning of maintenance agents or due to homeostatic repopulation after immune cell depletion, the threshold of B cell activation may be lowered. In human transplant recipients the result may be donor-specific antibody, C4d+ injury, and chronic rejection. This scenario has precise parallels in a rhesus monkey renal allograft model in which T cells are depleted with CD3 immunotoxin, or in a CD52-T cell transgenic mouse model using alemtuzumab to deplete T cells. Such animal models may be useful for the testing of therapeutic strategies to prevent DSA. We agree with others who suggest that weaning of immunosuppression may place transplant recipients at risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and that strategies to prevent this scenario are needed if we are to improve long-term graft and patient outcomes in transplantation. We believe that animal models will play a crucial role in defining the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection and in developing effective therapies to prevent graft injury. Two such animal models are described herein.