Clinically significant peripancreatic fluid collections after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95:1263-1269. [PMID: 23507700 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e318289c978]

Exploring definitions of graft pancreatitis following pancreas transplantation: A scoping review

Despite the clinical relevance of graft pancreatitis (GP) after pancreas transplantation (PT), a universally accepted definition is lacking. Aim of this scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of GP definitions reported in the literature. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Prospective/retrospective studies reporting a GP definition were included. The included series (n = 20) used four main criteria (clinical, biochemical, radiological and pathological) to define GP. Overall, 9 studies defined GP using a single criterion (n = 8 biochemical, n = 1 pathological), 7 series using two criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical, n = 3 biochemical + radiological, n = 1 clinical + radiological), 3 series using three criteria (n = 3 clinical + biochemical + radiological), and 1 series using four criteria. Overall, 20 definitions of GP were found. GP rate was reported by 19 series and ranged between 0% and 87%. This scoping review confirms that a universally accepted definition of GP is absent, and there is no consensus on the criteria on which it should be grounded. Future research should focus on developing a validated definition of GP.

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Energy Devices in Bench Surgery for Pancreas Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Bench surgery for the preparation of deceased donor pancreatic grafts is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that energy devices could be used during bench surgery to decrease the bench surgery time. However, because bench surgery has two unique characteristics, wet conditions and no blood flow in the vessels, it is necessary to verify the safety and efficacy under such conditions.

METHODS

In an animal tissue model, we validated both ultrasonic and bipolar energy devices: Harmonic Shears and the LigaSure (LS) vessel-sealing device by evaluating heat spread and pressure resistance under bench surgery conditions. In a clinical evaluation of the LS, we compared the outcomes of 22 patients in two different bench surgery groups: with and without the use of the LS.

RESULTS

Clinically, the bench surgery time was significantly shorter in the LS group than that in the conventional group (P < 0.001). In the animal tissue experiments, the highest temperature in bench surgery conditions was 60.4°C after 1 s at a 5-mm distance in the LS group. Pressure resistance of ≥ 750 mmHg was achieved in almost all trials in both veins and arteries, with no difference between Harmonic Shears and LS. There was more surgical smoke visually in bench conditions versus in dry conditions and under half bite versus full bite conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The encouraging results of our exploratory clinical and animal studies of the energy devices suggest that they may be useful in the setting of bench surgery.

Incidental appendicectomy in pancreas transplantation: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis in pancreatic transplant recipients can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Incidental appendicectomy (IA) during pancreas transplantation obviates the risk of appendicitis but potentially at the cost of increased operating time or early post-operative complications. This study reviewed the value of IA at a single center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a pancreas transplant in our unit from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2020, with end of follow-up on May 21st, 2023; recipients were grouped by whether or not an IA was performed during pancreas transplantation. Donor, recipient, operative, and graft outcomes were compared between the two groups. Post-transplant complications related to appendiceal pathology (or IA) were recorded and classified.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-three patients underwent a pancreas transplant; 227 (93%) patients had an appendix in situ at transplantation, and of these 53 (23%) underwent an IA and 174 (77%) did not. There were no statistically significant differences in operative time (p = .06) or hospital stay (p = .50) between the two groups. In the IA cohort, there were no Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications relating to the appendicectomy. In those that did not undergo an IA, two patients (1%) subsequently required appendicectomy due to appendicitis. Comparison of pancreatic graft survival showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .44).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that IA is effective at reducing risks of post-transplant appendiceal complications without significantly prolonging inpatient stay or impairing graft survival. These data support the consideration of undertaking an IA for all patients undergoing a pancreas transplant.

Surgical complications after pancreatic transplantation: A computed tomography imaging pictorial review

Pancreatic transplantation is considered by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes an acceptable surgical procedure in patients with type 1 diabetes also undergoing kidney transplantation in pre-final or end-stage renal disease if no contraindications are present. Pancreatic transplantation, however, is a complex surgical procedure and may lead to a range of postoperative complications that can significantly impact graft function and patient outcomes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is often adopted to evaluate perfusion of the transplanted pancreas, identify complications and as a guide for interventional radiology procedures. CT assessment after pancreatic transplantation should start with the evaluation of the arterial Y-graft, the venous anastomosis and the duodenojejunostomy. With regard to complications, CT allows for the identification of vascular complications, such as thrombosis or stenosis of blood vessels supplying the graft, the detection of pancreatic fluid collections, including pseudocysts, abscesses, or leaks, the assessment of bowel complications (anastomotic leaks, ileus or obstruction), and the identification of bleeding. The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate CT findings of surgical-related complications after pancreatic transplantation. The knowledge of surgical techniques is of key importance to understand postoperative anatomic changes and imaging evaluation. Therefore, we first provide a short summary of the main techniques of pancreatic transplantation. Then, we provide a practical imaging approach to pancreatic transplantation and its complications providing tips and tricks for the prompt imaging diagnosis on CT.

Poor utilization of deceased donor pancreata in the United States: Time for action

The number of solid organ pancreas transplants performed in the United States has declined over the past two decades despite improving outcomes and the known benefits associated with this procedure. Although the reasons are multifactorial, high rates of deceased donor pancreata nonrecovery and nonuse have at least in part contributed to the reduction in pancreas transplant activity. The pancreas has higher nonrecovery and nonuse rates compared to the kidney and liver because of more stringent donor selection criteria, particularly with respect to donor age and body mass index, although even marginally inferior donor pancreata likely still benefit some patients compared to alternative therapies. In this editorial, we present several donor-, candidate-, and center-specific factors that are either confirmed or suspected of being associated with inferior outcomes, which contribute to high pancreas nonrecovery and nonuse rates. In addition, we have discussed several measures to increase pancreas recovery and reduce pancreas nonutilization.

Interventional Radiology Approaches for Managing Postpancreatic Transplant Complications and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by the destruction of insulin-secreting beta cells in the pancreas, resulting in metabolic disturbances and long-term complications. While subcutaneous insulin remains the primary approach for achieving normoglycemia, pancreatic transplantation has emerged as an effective intervention for long-standing T1DM, providing insulin independence and normalized glycosylated hemoglobin levels. However, complications associated with pancreatic transplantation are frequent, necessitating thorough evaluation using diverse imaging modalities. This manuscript presents an overview of complications encountered with pancreatic transplantation, including vascular complications such as arterial and venous graft thrombosis, vessel stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, arterio-enteric fistula, and arteriovenous malformations. Additionally, the manuscript discusses other associated complications such as pancreatitis, pseudocyst formation, fistulas, pseudo-thrombosis of the iliac vein, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, and fluid collections. The integration of various imaging modalities plays a crucial role in diagnosing and managing these complications, with interventional radiologists assuming a vital role in employing image-guided procedures. Moreover, the manuscript explores pancreatic islet cell transplantation as a promising cellular-based therapy for T1DM, offering stable long-term glycemic control and decreased reliance on exogenous insulin in a significant proportion of recipients. This minimally invasive procedure involves the image-guided transcatheter infusion of islet cells obtained from deceased donors into the recipient's liver. The importance of interventional radiologists in managing complications related to pancreatic transplantation is underscored, with endovascular or image-guided approaches being utilized to address the diverse spectrum of encountered complications. Furthermore, the potential of islet cell transplantation as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional pancreatic transplantation is emphasized, as it offers the prospect of preventing many associated complications.

A Prospective Study of the Effect of Gastroduodenal Artery Reconstruction on Duodenal Oxygenation and Enzyme Content After Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Whole pancreas transplantation provides durable glycemic control and can improve survival rate; however, it can carry an increased risk of surgical complications. One devastating complication is a duodenal leak at the site of enteroenteric anastomosis. The gastroduodenal artery (GDA) supplies blood to the donor duodenum and pancreas but is commonly ligated during procurement. Since we have not had expressive changes in pancreatic back table surgical techniques in the recent decades, we hypothesized whether back table GDA reconstruction, improving perfusion of the donor duodenum and head of the pancreas, could lead to fewer surgical complications in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, we evaluated demographic information, postoperative complications, intraoperative donor duodenum, recipient bowel O2 tissue saturation, and patient morbidity through the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®).

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were included: 13 underwent GDA reconstruction (GDA-R), and 13 had GDA ligation (GDA-L). There were no pancreatic leaks in the GR group compared to 38% (5/13) in the GDA-L group (p = 0.03913). Intraoperative tissue oxygen saturation was higher in the GDA-R group than in the GDA-L (95.18 vs.76.88%, p < 0,001). We observed an increase in transfusion rate in GDA-R (p < 0.05), which did not result in a higher rate of exploration (p = 0.38). CCI® patient morbidity was also significantly lower in the GDA-R group (s < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified improved intraoperative duodenal tissue oxygen saturation in the GDA-R group with an associated reduction in pancreatic leaks and CCI® morbidity risk. A larger prospective multicenter study comparing the two methods is warranted.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: which graft warns the most?

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is still characterized by high rates of postoperative complications. This study aims to offer an in-depth characterization of early, medium-term, and late complications following SPK to derive insights for postoperative management and follow-up.

METHODS

Consecutive SPK transplantations were analysed. Pancreatic graft (P-graft)- and kidney graft (K-graft)-related complications were analysed separately. The global postoperative course was assessed in three timeframes (early, medium-term, and late) using the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Predictors of complications and early graft loss were explored.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 61.2% of patients, and the 90-day mortality was 3.9%. The overall burden of complications was significantly high during admission (CCI 22.4 ± 21.1) and decreased gradually afterwards. P-graft-related complications burdened the most in the early postoperative course (CCI 11.6 ± 13.8); postoperative ileus and perigraft fluid collection were the most frequent complications, and pseudoaneurysms, haemorrhages, and bowel leaks were the major concerns. K-related complications were milder but represented the largest proportion of the CCI in the late postoperative timeframe (CCI 7.6 ± 13.6). No predictors of P-graft- or K-graft-related complications were found.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas graft-related complications represent the largest part of the clinical burden in the early postoperative timeframe but are negligible after 3 months. Kidney grafts have a relevant impact in the long term. The multidisciplinary approach to SPK recipients should be driven based on all graft-specific complications and tailored on a time-dependent basis.

Appraising pancreatic fistula in pancreas transplantation: A comprehensive complication index based analysis of postoperative outcomes and predictors of graft survival

BACKGROUND

A definition of pancreatic fistula specifically addressing pancreas transplantation (PT) is lacking. This study sought to characterize pancreatic fistula in this setting and to define its clinical relevance on the postoperative course and long-term graft survival (GS).

METHODS

Consecutive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations were analysed. The global postoperative course was assessed through the comprehensive complication index (CCI). PF was defined according to the original International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Predictors of poor postoperative course and GS were explored.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were analysed. Surgical morbidity was 48.7%, with severe complications occurring in 39.7%. Ninety-day mortality was 2.6%. PF occurred in 56.6% of patients, although its average clinical burden was low and did not correlate with either early or long-term outcomes. Peri-graft fluid collections, postoperative day (POD) 1 drain fluid amylase (DFA) ≥ 2200 U/L, and POD 5 DFA/serum amylase ratio ≥7.0 independently correlated with poor postoperative course. Perigraft fluid collections were associated with reduced GS.

CONCLUSION

Conventionally defined pancreatic fistula is frequent following PT, although its clinical impact is negligible. To define clinically relevant PF, novel cut-offs for DFA might be pondered in a future series, while perigraft fluid collections should be strongly considered.

Post-pancreatic transplant enteric leaks: The role of the salvage operation

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation is complicated by an enteric leak in 5%-8%, frequently necessitating pancreatectomy. Pancreatic salvage outcomes are not well studied. Risk factors for enteric leak were examined and outcomes of attempted graft salvage were compared to immediate pancreatectomy. Pancreas transplants performed between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed. Donor, recipient, and organ variables including demographics, donor type, ischemic time, kidney donor profile index, and pancreas donor risk index were analyzed. Among 1153 patients, 33 experienced enteric leaks (2.9%). Donors of allografts that developed leak were older (37.9y vs. 29.0y, p = .001), had higher KDPI (37% vs. 24%, p < .001), higher pancreas donor risk index (1.83 vs. 1.32, p < .001), and longer cold ischemic time (16.5 vs. 14.8 h, p = .03). Intra-abdominal abscess and higher blood loss decreased the chance of successful salvage. Enteric leak increased 6-month graft loss risk (HR 13.9[CI 8.5-22.9], p < .001). However, 50% (n = 12) of allografts undergoing attempted salvage survived long-term. After 6 months of pancreas graft survival, salvage and non-leak groups had similar 5-year graft survival (82.5% vs. 81.5%) and mortality (90.9% vs. 93.5%). Enteric leaks remain a challenging complication. Pancreatic allograft salvage can be attempted in suitable patients and accomplished in 50% of cases without significantly increased graft failure or mortality risk.

Peripancreatic Fluid Collections After Pancreas Transplant: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Drainage

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections after pancreas transplant and to determine factors predicting a successful clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective study included 28 patients who underwent percutaneous drainage for peripancreatic collections after transplant between January 2008 and December 2018. Clinical success was defined as drainage resulting in resolution of symptoms. Primary clinical success was defined as symptom resolution after the initial drainage procedure, and secondary success was defined as symptom resolution after additional drainage procedures. Operative intervention or death was considered clinical failure. Patient, collection, and procedural factors were assessed for their potential impact on the clinical outcome. RESULTS. Clinical success was achieved in 23 of 28 drainage procedures (82.1%), with primary success in 15 procedures. Of the five patients with failed drainage procedures, three required pancreatectomies, one required surgical washout, and one died from a disseminated infection. The median duration of drainage in the clinical success group was 25 days (range, 3-136 days), and patients with longer drainage periods had more successful outcomes (p = .04). Graft pancreatitis was diagnosed in five patients (17.9%) and was not associated with drainage outcome (p = .21). Collections were positive for bacterial growth in 13 patients (46.4%) and were high in amylase in 12 (42.9%). We observed drainage failure in collections with polymicrobial growth and in the presence of fistulas (p = .05 and p = .07, respectively). Patients with successful outcomes had smaller collection volumes (p = .045). No complications attributed to drainage were encountered. CONCLUSION. Percutaneous drainage is safe and effective for management of peripancreatic fluid collections after pancreas transplant.

Serum pancreatic enzymes in the early postoperative period predict complications associated with pancreatic fluid after pancreas transplantation: A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a radical treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM). Although the results of PT have been improving, surgical complications remain. Few reports have focused on complications associated with pancreatic fluid (CAPF) after PT. We aimed to investigate the risk factors and predictors for CAPF after PT.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients, who underwent deceased-donor PT for type 1 DM at our institution from August 2001 to May 2020, were retrospectively studied. We identified CAPF from those with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III and assessed risk factors by univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (30.4%) patients had complications with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III. Eleven (16.0%) patients were diagnosed with CAPF. Median serum pancreatic amylase (P-AMY) levels with CAPF on postoperative day (POD)1 and POD2 were significantly higher than those without CAPF (P = .019 and P = .027, respectively). In multivariable analysis, serum P-AMY levels on POD1 were an independent predictive factor for CAPF (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.14, P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications associated with pancreatic fluid after PT is associated with high serum P-AMY in the early postoperative period. Serum pancreatic enzymes in the first few postoperative days after PT may be a significant predictive factor for CAPF.

First-day plasma amylase detects patients at risk of complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) carries a high risk of major postoperative complications, but knowledge on early warning signs and surrogate markers for postoperative complications is scarce.

AIMS

Our aim was to analyze the complication-predictive value of different laboratory tests in pancreas transplantation.

MATERIALS & METHODS

All SPKs in Finland between January 2010 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Levels of first three-day plasma amylase, drain fluid amylase, C-reactive protein, C-peptide, plasma trypsinogen, and white blood cell count were assessed for their performance predicting cumulative postoperative complications (assessed using the Comprehensive Complication Index) within 90 days from transplantation by using ROC analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 164 SPK patients included, 39 suffered at least one complication requiring laparotomy. First-day plasma amylase had the best value in predicting complications based on its high AUC value and easy clinical applicability, with an optimum cutoff of six times the upper normal limit. Negative predictive values (NPVs) and positive predictive values of this cutoff were 0.81 and 0.71 for any relaparotomy, and 0.91 and 0.71 for the Comprehensive Complication Index >47.7 (which equals the morbidity of two relaparotomies), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, first-day plasma amylase could be able to detect patients at risk of complications after SPK.

Donor risk factors in pancreas transplantation

The aim of the work was to analyze and expose the donor and recipient risk factors in pancreas transplantation. In the following paper, we exposed the 2018 Spanish Consensus Document on Donor and Recipient Selection Criteria for Pancreas Transplantation. An assessment of the previous Selection Criteria for Donors and Recipients of Pancreas Transplantation, published in 2005 by the Spanish Pancreas Transplant Group (GETP) and the National Transplant Organization (ONT) was performed. A literature review was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Some of the following terms were used for the literature search: “Diabetes Mellitus,” “Pancreas Transplantation,” “Insulin-Secreting Cells,” “Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis,” “Allograft Pancreatitis,” “Donors’ Risk Factors,” “Recipients’ Risk Factors,” “Pancreas Allograft Rejection” and “Pancreas Allograft Survival.” After an extended search, different inclusion criteria were established. Articles and documents with abstracts of full text and in English or Spanish language were selected. Subsequently, different scientific meetings took place during 2015 and 2016 by the GETP. Finally, the updated criteria were published by the GETP and ONT in 2018. Several risk factors have been described in pancreas transplantation that can be divided into donor risk factors: Advanced age (> 50 years); high body mass index (BMI) (> 30 kg/m²); cause of death (e.g., stroke); previous hyperglycemia; hyperamylasemia; cold ischemia time (greater than 8 or 12 h, depending on the type of donation); the use of vasopressors in the intensive care unit or cardiac arrest; and the macroscopic aspect of the pancreas allograft. The following are recipient risk factors: Advanced age (> 50 years); active smoking; high BMI (> 30 kg/m²); and peripheral artery disease or sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Based on the aforementioned parameters, different selection criteria have been established for the recipients depending on the type of pancreas transplantation. Knowledge of the risk factors for pancreas transplantation allows the establishment of reliable selection criteria for choosing donors and recipients.

Management of vascular and nonvascular complications following pancreas transplantation with interventional radiology

Pancreas transplantation exposes to high rates of complications, either vascular (thrombosis, stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula) or nonvascular (fluid collection, graft rejection). With advances in percutaneous and endovascular techniques, interventional radiologists are increasingly involved in the management of these complications. In this article, we review the anatomical considerations relevant to pancreas transplantation, the techniques used for image-guided interventions for vascular and nonvascular complications, and the expected outcomes of these interventions.

Pancreas grafts for transplantation from donors with hypertension: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database

BACKGROUND

With the rising demands for pancreas transplantation, surgeons are trying to extend the donors pool and set up a more appropriate assessment system. We aim to evaluate the effect of donor hypertension on recipient overall and graft survival rates.

METHODS

Twenty-four thousand one hundred ninety-two pancreas transplantation patients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were subdivided into hypertension group (HTN, n = 1531) and non-hypertension group (non-HTN, n = 22,661) according to the hypertension status of donors. Recipient overall and graft survival were analyzed and compared by log rank test, and hazard ratios of predictors were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Patient overall and graft survival of non-HTN group were higher than that of the HTN group (both p < 0.001). The duration of hypertension negatively influenced both overall and graft survival rates (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that hypertension was an independent factor for reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.18; p < 0.001). Other independent factors included recipient body mass index (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p < 0.001) and transplant type (pancreas after kidney transplants / pancreas transplant alone vs. simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 134-1.55; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor hypertension is an independent factor for recipient survival after pancreas transplantation and could be considered in donor selection as well as post-transplant surveillance in clinical practice.

Pancreas Transplantation With Grafts From Donors Deceased After Circulatory Death: 5 Years Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) pancreas transplantation has been shown to be an additional way to deal with donor organ shortages. The results of 5-year DCD pancreas transplantation are presented.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis (2011-2015) was performed to compare the results of donation after brain death (DBD) to DCD pancreas transplantation.

RESULTS

During the study period, 104 pancreas transplantations (83 from DBD and 21 from DCD) were performed. Median Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) was 1.47, (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 1.35; P = 0.144). Without the factor DCD, PDRI from DCD donors was significantly lower (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 0.97; P < 0.001). Donor age was the only donor-related risk factor associated with pancreas graft survival (Hazard ratio, 1.06; P = 0.037). Postoperative bleeding and kidney delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients from DCD (P = 0.006). However, DCD pancreata had a lower incidence of thrombosis. Kidney and pancreas graft survival were equally good in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation from DCD donors yields comparable results to DBD donors when PDRI of DCD is relatively low. Most DCD donors are younger donors with trauma as cause of death. These DCD pancreas grafts may be a better option to cope with increasing organ shortages than exploring the limits with older (and higher PDRI) DBD donors.

Preserving the Pancreas Graft: Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Duodenal Leaks in Enterically Drained Pancreas Allografts

BACKGROUND

Duodenal leak remains a major cause of morbidity and graft loss in pancreas transplant recipients. The role and efficacy of surgical and image-guided interventions to salvage enterically drained grafts with a duodenal leak has yet to be defined.

METHODS

We investigated the incidence, treatment, and outcome of duodenal leak in 426 pancreas transplantation recipients from 2000 to 2015.

RESULTS

Duodenal leak developed in 33 (7.8%) recipients after a median follow-up of 5.3 (range, 0.5-15.2) years. Most leaks occurred during the first year (n = 22; 67%), and most were located near the proximal and distal duodenal staple line. Graft pancreatectomy was performed in 8 patients as primary therapy because of unfavorable local and/or systemic conditions. Salvage was attempted in 25 patients using percutaneous drainage (n = 4), surgical drainage (n = 4), or surgical repair (n = 17). Percutaneous or surgical drainage failed to control the leak in 7 of these 8 patients, and all 7 ultimately required graft pancreatectomy for persistent leak and sepsis. Surgical repair salvaged 14 grafts, and 13 grafts continue to function after a median follow-up of 2.9 (range, 1.1-6.3) years after repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that in selected patients a duodenal leak can be repaired successfully and safely in enterically drained grafts.

Management of Graft Duodenal Leak in Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant-a Case Report from India and Review of Literature

Pancreatic transplantation is currently the only effective cure for Type 1 diabetes mellitus. It allows long-term glycemic control without exogenous insulin and amelioration of secondary diabetic complications. In India, pancreas transplant has not yet established with only a single successful transplant reported so far in the literature. We report a 24-year-old Type 1 diabetic patient with renal failure who underwent a simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant. On postoperative day 15, he had leak from the graft duodenal stump for which a tube duodenostomy and proximal diversion enterostomy was done. He had a high output pancreatic fistula following the procedure which was managed conservatively. The tube duodenostomy was removed at three and half months and enterostomy closure with restoration of bowel continuity was done at 6 months. After a follow up of 7 months, patient is doing well with a serum creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl and normal blood sugars, not requiring any exogenous insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs. Managing patients with graft duodenal complications after pancreas transplant is challenging. Tube duodenostomy is a safe option in management of duodenal leak, although can lead to a persistent pancreatic fistula. A proximal diversion enterostomy allows early oral feeding and avoids the cost as well as the long term complications associated with parenteral nutrition.

Use of Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion for Quality Assessment of Discarded Human Donor Pancreases

A significant number of pancreases procured for transplantation are deemed unsuitable due to concerns about graft quality and the associated risk of complications. However, this decision is subjective and some declined grafts may be suitable for transplantation. Ex vivo normothermic perfusion (EVNP) prior to transplantation may allow a more objective assessment of graft quality and reduce discard rates. We report ex vivo normothermic perfusion of human pancreases procured but declined for transplantation, with ABO-compatible warm oxygenated packed red blood cells for 1-2 h. Five declined human pancreases were assessed using this technique after a median cold ischemia time of 13 h 19 min. One pancreas, with cold ischemia over 30 h, did not appear viable and was excluded. In the remaining pancreases, blood flow and pH were maintained throughout perfusion. Insulin secretion was observed in all four pancreases, but was lowest in an older donation after cardiac death pancreas. Amylase levels were highest in a gland with significant fat infiltration. This is the first study to assess the perfusion, injury, as measured by amylase, and exocrine function of human pancreases using EVNP and demonstrates the feasibility of the approach, although further refinements are required.

Allograft Pancreatectomy: Indications and Outcomes

This study evaluated the indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of allograft pancreatectomy based on a single center experience. Between 2003 and 2013, 47 patients developed pancreas allograft failure, excluding mortality with a functioning pancreas allograft. Early graft loss (within 14 days) occurred in 16, and late graft loss in 31. All patients with early graft loss eventually required allograft pancreatectomy. Nineteen of 31 patients (61%) with late graft loss underwent allograft pancreatectomy. The main indication for early allograft pancreatectomy included vascular thrombosis with or without severe pancreatitis, whereas one recipient required urgent allograft pancreatectomy for gastrointestinal hemorrhage secondary to an arterioenteric fistula. In cases of late allograft pancreatectomy, graft failure with clinical symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, pain, and nausea were the main indications (13/19 [68%]), simultaneous retransplantation without clinical symptoms in 3 (16%), and vascular catastrophes including pseudoaneurysm and enteric arterial fistula in 3 (16%). Postoperative morbidity included one case each of pulmonary embolism leading to mortality, formation of pseudoaneurysm requiring placement of covered stent, and postoperative bleeding requiring relaparotomy eventually leading to femoro-femoral bypass surgery 2 years after allograftectomy. Allograft pancreatectomy can be performed safely, does not preclude subsequent retransplantation, and may be lifesaving in certain instances.

Multi detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the diagnosis of early complications after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE

Solitary Pancreas (SPT) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPKT) transplants carry a high risk of surgical complications that may lead to the loss of the pancreas graft and impact later kidney function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of MDCT in the diagnosis of early complications and its impact on kidney function.

METHODS

All patients receiving SPT or SPKT over 5 years were retrospectively included. Complications that occurred within the first 15 days were registered and MDCT data analyzed. Data regarding donor, transplant, and recipient characteristics as well as transplantation procedures were analyzed according to the occurrence of early complications. Kidney function at day 3 following MDCT was evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one patients were included (85 men, 56 women; mean age 40.1 years, SD 7.7) with 119 SPKT and 22 SPT. Sixty-four complications were registered in 50 patients. Partial (P-) or complete venous thrombosis (C-VT) occurred in 12.1 % (n = 17), arterial thrombosis (AT) in 1.4 % (n = 2), and hemorrhage in 8.5 % (n = 12) of all patients. For venous thrombosis, the predominant risk factor was body mass index (BMI) for either recipients (P < 0.05) or donors (P < 0.01). Median time for venous thrombosis diagnosis with MDCT was 4 days. Kidney function was not altered following MDCT. Fourteen pancreatectomies were necessary. All patients with C-VT and AT had to undergo graftectomy.

CONCLUSION

Vascular complications occurred early following grafting. Systematic early-enhanced MDCT at day 2-3 should be adequate to detect early thrombosis, especially if risk factors have been identified, without induced kidney function alteration.

Duodenal leaks after pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage - characteristics and risk factors

Pancreas-kidney transplantation with enteric drainage has become a standard treatment in diabetic patients with renal failure. Leaks of the graft duodenum (DL) remain a significant complication after transplantation. We studied incidence and predisposing factors of DLs in both simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. Between January 2002 and April 2013, 284 pancreas transplantations were performed including 191 SPK (67.3%) and 93 PAK (32.7%). Patient data were analyzed for occurrence of DLs, risk factors, leak etiology, and graft survival. Of 18 DLs (incidence 6.3%), 12 (67%) occurred within the first 100 days after transplantation. Six grafts (33%) were rescued by duodenal segment resection. Risk factors for a DL were PAK transplantation sequence (odds ratio 3.526, P = 0.008) and preoperative immunosuppression (odds ratio 3.328, P = 0.012). In the SPK subgroup, postoperative peak amylase as marker of preservation/reperfusion injury and recipient pretransplantation cardiovascular interventions as marker of atherosclerosis severity were associated with an increased incidence of DLs. CMV-mismatch constellations showed an increased incidence in the SPK subgroup, however without significance probability. Long-term immunosuppression in PAK transplantation is a major risk factor for DLs. Early surgical revision offers the chance of graft rescue.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: lessons learned from the initial experience of a single center in Korea

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to report the results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations and describe the lessons learned from the early experiences of a single center.

Methods

Between January 2002 and June 2013, a total of 8 patients underwent SPK transplantation. Clinical and radiologic data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Seven patients were diagnosed with type I diabetes mellitus and one patient became insulin-dependent after undergoing a total pancreatectomy because of trauma. Pancreas exocrine drainage was performed by enteric drainage in 4 patients and bladder drainage in 4 patients. Three patients required conversion from initial bladder drainage to enteric drainage due to urinary symptoms and duodenal leakage. Four patients required a relaparotomy due to hemorrhage, ureteral stricture, duodenal leakage, and venous thrombosis. There was no kidney graft loss, and 2 patients had pancreas graft loss because of venous thrombosis and new onset of type II diabetes mellitus. With a median follow-up of 76 months (range, 2-147 months), the death-censored graft survival rates for the pancreas were 85.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years and 42.9% at 10 years. The patient survival rate was 87.5% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.

Conclusion

The long-term grafts and patient survival in the current series are comparable to previous studies. A successful pancreas transplant program can be established in a single small-volume institute. A meticulous surgical technique and early anticoagulation therapy are required for further improvement in the outcomes.