Identification of Novel and Noninvasive Biomarkers of Acute Cellular Rejection After Liver Transplantation by Protein Microarray

Identification of High-Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) Expression as a Potential Predictor of Rejection and Poor Prognosis After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND Acute cellular rejection (ACR) frequently occurs after liver transplantation (LT) and can result in permanent damage of the liver allograft. Specific and sensitive biomarkers for predicting and monitoring ACR are vital for guiding post-transplantation care. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the function of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in predicting ACR and prognosis after LT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 113 LT recipients were enrolled in the study, including 62 patients in an ACR group and 51 patients in a non-rejection group. Using tissues from the 113 patients, HMGB1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry, and the total score for HMGB1 expression was calculated by multiplying the percentage of immunoreactive cells score and the staining intensity score. We then analyzed the association between HMGB1 expression and clinical features. Finally, the function of HMGB1 in predicting the prognosis of LT was determined using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival and Cox multivariate analyses. RESULTS Immunohistochemical staining results demonstrated that the expression of HMGB1 was significantly increased in the ACR group, compared with that in the non-rejection group (P<0.05). Clinical characteristic analysis revealed that high HMGB1 levels were related to ACR (P<0.05). Moreover, K-M survival analysis showed that patients with high HMGB1 expression displayed poorer prognosis (P<0.05). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that HMGB1 was an independent prognostic predictor for post-LT survival (odds ratio, 3.283; P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS LT recipients' HMGB1 levels may be a useful and noninvasive biomarker for the prediction of ACR and prognosis after LT.

The molecular diagnosis of rejection in liver transplant biopsies: First results of the INTERLIVER study

Molecular diagnosis of rejection is emerging in kidney, heart, and lung transplant biopsies and could offer insights for liver transplant biopsies. We measured gene expression by microarrays in 235 liver transplant biopsies from 10 centers. Unsupervised archetypal analysis based on expression of previously annotated rejection-related transcripts identified 4 groups: normal "R1_normal " (N = 129), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) "R2_TCMR " (N = 37), early injury "R3_injury " (N = 61), and fibrosis "R4_late " (N = 8). Groups differed in median time posttransplant, for example, R3_injury 99 days vs R4_late 3117 days. R2_TCMR biopsies expressed typical TCMR-related transcripts, for example, intense IFNG-induced effects. R3_injury displayed increased expression of parenchymal injury transcripts (eg, hypoxia-inducible factor EGLN1). R4_late biopsies showed immunoglobulin transcripts and injury-related transcripts. R2_TCMR correlated with histologic rejection although with many discrepancies, and R4_late with fibrosis. R2_TCMR , R3_injury , and R4_late correlated with liver function abnormalities. Supervised classifiers trained on histologic rejection showed less agreement with histology than unsupervised R2_TCMR scores. No confirmed cases of clinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) were present in the population, and strategies that previously revealed ABMR in kidney and heart transplants failed to reveal a liver ABMR phenotype. In conclusion, molecular analysis of liver transplant biopsies detects rejection, has the potential to resolve ambiguities, and could assist with immunosuppressive management.

Identification of HO-1 as a novel biomarker for graft acute cellular rejection and prognosis prediction after liver transplantation

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases, but acute rejection is still a major concern. However, the mechanisms underlying rejection remain unclear. Biomarkers are lacking for predicting rejection and long-term survival after LT.

Methods

Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomics was performed between acute cellular rejection (ACR) and non-rejection recipients. The molecular signature differences and potential biomarkers were identified by comprehensive bioinformatics. Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression and its association with clinical outcomes were investigated by tissue microarrays consisted of liver specimens from recipients with (n=80) and without ACR (n=57).

Results

A total of 287 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified. Pathway analysis revealed that T/B cell activation, integrin/inflammation signaling pathway, etc. were significantly correlated with ACR. Through comprehensive bioinformatics, HO-1 was identified as a candidate potential biomarker for ACR. In tissue microarray (TMA) analysis, HO-1 expression was significantly higher in ACR group than in non-rejection group (P<0.01). Preoperative Child-Pugh and Meld scores were significantly higher in recipients with high HO-1 expression (P<0.01). In a mean 5-year follow-up, recipients with high HO-1 expression were associated with a shorter overall survival (P<0.05). Further multivariate analyses indicated that HO-1 could be an independent adverse prognostic factor for post-transplant survival (P=0.005).

Conclusions

A total of 287 DEPs were identified, providing a set of targets for further research. Recipients with high preoperative HO-1 expression were associated with ACR. HO-1 may be used as a potential biomarker for predicting the development of post-transplant allograft ACR and recipient's survival.

Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation.

Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard.

Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian–Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve.

Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I² = 72% [95% CI: 0.5–0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78–0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69–0.89]).

Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application.