1
|
Ioannou K, Bucci M, Tzortzakakis A, Savitcheva I, Nordberg A, Chiotis K. Tau PET positivity predicts clinically relevant cognitive decline driven by Alzheimer's disease compared to comorbid cases; proof of concept in the ADNI study. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02672-9. [PMID: 39179903 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02672-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology is not always coupled with Alzheimer's disease (AD) relevant cognitive decline. We assessed the accuracy of tau PET to identify Aβ(+) individuals who show prospective disease progression. 396 cognitively unimpaired and impaired individuals with baseline Aβ and tau PET and a follow-up of ≥ 2 years were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative dataset. The participants were dichotomously grouped based on either clinical conversion (i.e., change of diagnosis) or cognitive deterioration (fast (FDs) vs. slow decliners (SDs)) using data-driven clustering of the individual annual rates of cognitive decline. To assess cognitive decline in individuals with isolated Aβ(+) or absence of both Aβ and tau (T) pathologies, we investigated the prevalence of non-AD comorbidities and FDG PET hypometabolism patterns suggestive of AD. Baseline tau PET uptake was higher in Aβ(+)FDs than in Aβ(-)FD/SDs and Aβ(+)SDs, independently of baseline cognitive status. Baseline tau PET uptake identified MCI Aβ(+) Converters and Aβ(+)FDs with an area under the curve of 0.85 and 0.87 (composite temporal region of interest) respectively, and was linearly related to the annual rate of cognitive decline in Aβ(+) individuals. The T(+) individuals constituted largely a subgroup of those being Aβ(+) and those clustered as FDs. The most common biomarker profiles in FDs (n = 70) were Aβ(+)T(+) (n = 34, 49%) and Aβ(+)T(-) (n = 19, 27%). Baseline Aβ load was higher in Aβ(+)T(+)FDs (M = 83.03 ± 31.42CL) than in Aβ(+)T(-)FDs (M = 63.67 ± 26.75CL) (p-value = 0.038). Depression diagnosis was more prevalent in Aβ(+)T(-)FDs compared to Aβ(+)T(+)FDs (47% vs. 15%, p-value = 0.021), as were FDG PET hypometabolism pattern not suggestive of AD (86% vs. 50%, p-value = 0.039). Our findings suggest that high tau PET uptake is coupled with both Aβ pathology and accelerated cognitive decline. In cases of isolated Aβ(+), cognitive decline may be associated with changes within the AD spectrum in a multi-morbidity context, i.e., mixed AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Ioannou
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Bucci
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antonios Tzortzakakis
- Division of Radiology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Section for Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irina Savitcheva
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Section for Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Konstantinos Chiotis
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:3708-3821. [PMID: 38689398 PMCID: PMC11095490 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care and the ramifications of AD for family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses the larger health care system for older adults with cognitive issues, focusing on the role of caregivers and non-physician health care professionals. An estimated 6.9 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or cure AD. Official AD death certificates recorded 119,399 deaths from AD in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. Official counts for more recent years are still being compiled. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2021, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 140%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2023. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $346.6 billion in 2023. Its costs, however, extend to unpaid caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Members of the paid health care and broader community-based workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. However, the United States faces growing shortages across different segments of the dementia care workforce due to a combination of factors, including the absolute increase in the number of people living with dementia. Therefore, targeted programs and care delivery models will be needed to attract, better train and effectively deploy health care and community-based workers to provide dementia care. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2024 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $360 billion. The Special Report investigates how caregivers of older adults with cognitive issues interact with the health care system and examines the role non-physician health care professionals play in facilitating clinical care and access to community-based services and supports. It includes surveys of caregivers and health care workers, focusing on their experiences, challenges, awareness and perceptions of dementia care navigation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Armstrong MJ, Bedenfield N, Rosselli M, Curiel Cid RE, Kitaigorodsky M, Galvin JE, Lachner C, Grant Smith A, de Los Ángeles Ortega M, Mohiuddin Y, Shatzer J, Marasco D, Willis D, Bylund CL. Best Practices for Communicating a Diagnosis of Dementia: Results of a Multi-Stakeholder Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Neurol Clin Pract 2024; 14:e200223. [PMID: 38152063 PMCID: PMC10750429 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Many individuals with dementia and their families report not receiving a dementia diagnosis. Previously published standards for delivering a dementia diagnosis are now more than 10 years old and were developed without patient and caregiver input. The objective of this study was to identify best practices for delivering a diagnosis of dementia using existing literature, involvement of diverse stakeholders, and consensus building through a formal modified Delphi approach. Methods We convened a multi-stakeholder working group including a patient, caregivers, Alzheimer's Association staff, and clinicians from diverse backgrounds. The panel used the American Academy of Neurology process for recommendation development, consisting of a half-day workshop and 3 rounds of anonymous modified Delphi voting to achieve consensus. Results The working group convened from May 2022 through January 2023. The group chose to focus statements on a limited number of best practices that can be applied across clinic types. Seven best practice statements achieved consensus after a maximum of 3 rounds of voting. These included the following: (1) Clinicians must show compassion and empathy when delivering a diagnosis of dementia (level A). During dementia diagnosis disclosure, clinicians should (2) ask regarding diagnosis preferences, (3) instill realistic hope, (4) provide practical strategies, (5) provide education and connections to high-quality resources, (6) connect caregivers to support resources, and (7) provide written summaries of the diagnoses, plan, and relevant resources (each level B). Discussion Clinicians need to customize discussion of a dementia diagnosis for individual patients and their caregivers. These 7 best practices provide a diagnosis communication framework that can be implemented across varied clinical settings. Additional strategies, such as using optimal general communication approaches, are also important for dementia diagnosis discussions. Thoughtful application of these best practices is particularly important when caring for individuals from underrepresented communities. Further improving communication regarding dementia diagnoses will require health system changes (e.g., for sufficient time), improved access to specialty dementia care, and clinician training for delivering difficult diagnoses. More research is needed to identify culturally sensitive approaches to discussing dementia diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Noheli Bedenfield
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Monica Rosselli
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Rosie E Curiel Cid
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Marcela Kitaigorodsky
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - James E Galvin
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Christian Lachner
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Amanda Grant Smith
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - María de Los Ángeles Ortega
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Yasmin Mohiuddin
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Julie Shatzer
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Deann Marasco
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Dianna Willis
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report examines the patient journey from awareness of cognitive changes to potential treatment with drugs that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's. An estimated 6.7 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, and Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2022. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $339.5 billion in 2022. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the paid health care workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. In recent years, however, a shortage of such workers has developed in the United States. This shortage - brought about, in part, by COVID-19 - has occurred at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Therefore, programs will be needed to attract workers and better train health care teams. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2023 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $345 billion. The Special Report examines whether there will be sufficient numbers of physician specialists to provide Alzheimer's care and treatment now that two drugs are available that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mozersky J, Solomon ED, Baldwin K, Wroblewski M, Parsons M, Goodman M, DuBois JM. Barriers to Using Legally Authorized Representatives in Clinical Research with Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2023; 7:135-149. [PMID: 36891257 PMCID: PMC9986706 DOI: 10.3233/adr-220103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older adults are at increased risk of cognitive impairments including Alzheimer's disease dementia. Legally authorized representatives (LARs) can provide informed consent when a participant is no longer able to, but little is known about barriers to incorporating them in research. Objective Explore reasons for not asking and documenting participant decisions to appoint LARs among researchers conducting clinical intervention trials studying older adults or individuals with cognitive impairments. Methods Mixed method design consisting of a survey (N = 1,284) and qualitative interviews (N = 40) regarding barriers to incorporating LARs. Participants were principal investigators and clinical research coordinators. Results 37% (N = 469) had not asked and documented participant decisions about appointing LARs in the prior year. They had significantly lower confidence in resources available to incorporate LARs and lower positive attitudes compared to their counterparts who had done so. The majority (83%) had no trials studying individuals with cognitive impairments and reported LARs were not applicable. A minority (17%) had at least one trial studying individuals with cognitive impairments and reported being unaware of LARs. Qualitative findings indicate discomfort broaching a sensitive topic especially with individuals who are not yet impaired. Conclusion Resources and education to increase awareness and knowledge of LARs are needed. Researchers studying older adults should, at minimum, have the knowledge and resources to incorporate LARs when necessary. Stigma and discomfort discussing LARs will need to be overcome, as early proactive discussions before a participant loses decisional capacity could enhance participant autonomy and facilitate recruitment and retention of older adults to research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Mozersky
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Erin D. Solomon
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kari Baldwin
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew Wroblewski
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Meredith Parsons
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melody Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M. DuBois
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wollney EN, Armstrong MJ, Bedenfield N, Rosselli M, Curiel-Cid RE, Kitaigorodsky M, Levy X, Bylund CL. Barriers and Best Practices in Disclosing a Dementia Diagnosis: A Clinician Interview Study. Health Serv Insights 2022; 15:11786329221141829. [PMID: 36506598 PMCID: PMC9729996 DOI: 10.1177/11786329221141829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The vast majority of individuals with dementia want to receive a diagnosis. Research suggests, however, that only a fraction of individuals with dementia receive a diagnosis and patients and families often feel the information is poorly explained. We thus aimed to assess clinician-reported barriers to dementia disclosure and recommendations for giving a dementia diagnosis. To accomplish this, we performed telephone interviews with 15 clinicians from different specialties using a semi-structured interview guide. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Clinician-reported barriers fit 3 categories: patient and caregiver-related barriers, clinician-related barriers, and barriers related to the triadic interaction. Patient and caregiver-related barriers included lack of social support, misunderstanding the diagnosis, and denial. Clinician barriers included difficulty giving bad news, difficulty communicating uncertainty, and lack of time. Triadic interaction barriers included challenges meeting multiple goals or needs and family requests for non-disclosure. Recommendations for best practice included for clinicians to foster relationships, educate patients and family, and take a family-centered approach. Clinicians described recommendations for fostering relationships such as using empathic communication and developing and maintaining connection. Educating patients and families included tailoring communication, explaining how the diagnosis was reached, and following up. Family approaches included meeting with family members prior to delivering the diagnosis and involving the caregiver in the discussion. Findings may inform updated recommendations for best practices when communicating a dementia diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Easton N Wollney
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA,Easton N Wollney, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
| | - Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Noheli Bedenfield
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Monica Rosselli
- Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL, USA
| | - Rosie E Curiel-Cid
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marcela Kitaigorodsky
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ximena Levy
- Clinical Research Unit, Division of Research, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses consumers' and primary care physicians' perspectives on awareness, diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), including MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. An estimated 6.5 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available. Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 and the seventh-leading cause of death in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 16 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2021. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $271.6 billion in 2021. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the dementia care workforce have also been affected by COVID-19. As essential care workers, some have opted to change jobs to protect their own health and the health of their families. However, this occurs at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2022 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $321 billion. A recent survey commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association revealed several barriers to consumers' understanding of MCI. The survey showed low awareness of MCI among Americans, a reluctance among Americans to see their doctor after noticing MCI symptoms, and persistent challenges for primary care physicians in diagnosing MCI. Survey results indicate the need to improve MCI awareness and diagnosis, especially in underserved communities, and to encourage greater participation in MCI-related clinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Challenges in disclosing and receiving a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic review of practice from the perspectives of people with dementia, carers, and healthcare professionals. Int Psychogeriatr 2021; 33:1161-1192. [PMID: 33726880 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610221000119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disclosing a diagnosis of dementia is a key process involving people with dementia, carers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) that can facilitate access to treatment and support. Receiving a diagnosis of dementia may represent a change in identity and loss of a planned-for future, resulting in an emotional impact for both people with dementia and carers. Delivering the diagnosis of dementia can be difficult and draining for HCPs. METHODS We conducted a systematic review that included studies which explored the experience of giving or receiving a diagnosis of dementia from the perspectives of people with dementia, carers, or HCPs. All study designs were eligible except for previous literature reviews. Findings were analyzed thematically and grouped into categories and then synthesized into a narrative review. The quality of all included studies was assessed. RESULTS Fifty-two studies were included in this review. Findings indicated that receiving a diagnosis is generally a negative process for people with dementia, carers, and HCPs and leaves carers in particular feeling uncertain over the prognosis and future of the person they care for. Disclosing a diagnosis of dementia is a difficult and complex process, for which formal training and guidance is lacking. Carers in particular would welcome more opportunity for realistic and hopeful discussions of the implications of receiving a diagnosis of dementia. CONCLUSIONS Changes in some aspects of disclosure, such as providing a truthful diagnosis to the person with dementia, have occurred over the last decade. A process approach involving pre-diagnostic counseling and follow-up appointments could enable discussions regarding prognosis and the future, create opportunities to clarify the diagnosis, and reduce emotional burden on HCPs. There is a need for more objective evidence that considers the perspectives of all individuals involved.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wynn MJ, Ju CH, Hill PL. Sense of Purpose Following a Dementia Diagnostic Appointment: Comparing Self- and Other-Reports of Care Recipients and Care Partners. Front Psychol 2021; 12:703478. [PMID: 34484054 PMCID: PMC8415023 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Purpose in life tends to decline in older adulthood and it is thought that intact cognitive functioning is required for purposeful living. Thus, it is likely that individuals may perceive older adults who are experiencing cognitive declines associated with dementia as having a reduced sense of purpose. Biases such as these may influence how individuals, especially care partners, interact with those with dementia. Method: This study examined how sense of purpose changed following a dementia diagnostic appointment for both the person receiving a diagnosis and their care partner. This study also explored how each individual perceived the other member of the dyad’s sense of purpose. Older adults (47 care recipients and 75 care partners, 57% female; Mage = 68.5 years, SDage = 12.0 years) provided self- and other-report ratings of sense of purpose before and after their appointment at a specialized memory clinic. Results: Overall, both care recipients and care partners’ sense of purpose declined following a dementia diagnostic appointment [t(85) = 7.01, p < 0.001]. However, when comparing self-reports and other-reports of purpose, care partners reported that care recipients experienced a lower sense of purpose in life than the care recipients reported about themselves. Conclusions: Care recipients and partners reported less purpose in life following their dementia diagnostic appointment. Care partners may hold certain biases regarding sense of purpose toward care recipients. These findings can inform future work regarding how care recipients and care partners can plan purposeful lives following a dementia diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Wynn
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Catherine H Ju
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Patrick L Hill
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the challenges of providing equitable health care for people with dementia in the United States. An estimated 6.2 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 15.3 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2020. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $256.7 billion in 2020. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2021 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $355 billion. Despite years of efforts to make health care more equitable in the United States, racial and ethnic disparities remain - both in terms of health disparities, which involve differences in the burden of illness, and health care disparities, which involve differences in the ability to use health care services. Blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Native Americans continue to have a higher burden of illness and lower access to health care compared with Whites. Such disparities, which have become more apparent during COVID-19, extend to dementia care. Surveys commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association recently shed new light on the role of discrimination in dementia care, the varying levels of trust between racial and ethnic groups in medical research, and the differences between groups in their levels of concern about and awareness of Alzheimer's disease. These findings emphasize the need to increase racial and ethnic diversity in both the dementia care workforce and in Alzheimer's clinical trials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gonella S, Basso I, Clari M, Dimonte V, Di Giulio P. A qualitative study of nurses' perspective about the impact of end-of-life communication on the goal of end-of-life care in nursing home. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 35:502-511. [PMID: 32343871 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With a growing nursing home population suffering from chronic progressive illnesses and evolving patterns of comorbidities, end-of-life communication takes on a critical role to enable healthcare professionals to gather information about the resident's wishes for care at the end-of-life and organise the care plan accordingly. AIM To explore nurses' perspective about the process by which end-of-life communication impacts on the goal of end-of-life care in nursing home residents. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive research design based on thematic analysis was performed. Fourteen nurses involved in the care of residents during their last week of life were recruited across 13 Italian nursing homes and accounted for 34 semi-structured interviews. A combined approach of analysis that incorporated a data-driven inductive approach and a theory-driven one was adopted. RESULTS Twelve themes described how end-of-life communication may contribute to adjust the care plan in nursing home according to the nurses' perspective. Five antecedents (i.e. life crisis or transitions, patient-centered environment, arising the question of possible dying, quality of relationships and culture of care) influenced the establishment and quality of communication, and five attributes depicted the characteristics and potential mechanisms of end-of-life communication (i.e. healthcare professional-resident and healthcare professional-family carers communication, knowledge of family carers' preferences, knowledge of residents' preferences, family carers and residents understanding, and shared decision-making), while curative-oriented and palliative-oriented care goals emerged as consequences. CONCLUSION This study provides insight into the nursing perspective of end-of-life communication between healthcare professionals and bereaved family carers of nursing home residents. Several factors influenced the occurrence and quality of end-of-life communication, which contributed to the transition towards palliative-oriented care by using and improving knowledge about family cares' and resident's preferences for end-of-life care, promoting family carers and residents understanding about prognosis and treatments available, and fostering shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gonella
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.,Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Ines Basso
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Clari
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Valerio Dimonte
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.,Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Di Giulio
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin PJ, Emerson J, Faul JD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Fillit HM, Daly AT, Margaretos N, Freund KM. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Knowledge About One's Dementia Status. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:1763-1770. [PMID: 32282058 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine racial and ethnic differences in knowledge about one's dementia status. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING The 2000 to 2014 Health and Retirement Study. PARTICIPANTS Our sample included 8,686 person-wave observations representing 4,065 unique survey participants, aged 70 years or older, with dementia, as identified by a well-validated statistical prediction model based on individual demographic and clinical characteristics. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome measure was knowledge of one's dementia status, as reported in the survey. Patient characteristics included race/ethnicity, age, sex, survey year, cognition, function, comorbidity, and whether living in a nursing home. RESULTS Among subjects identified as having dementia by the prediction model, 43.5% to 50.2%, depending on the survey year, reported that they were informed of the dementia status by their physician. This proportion was lower among Hispanics (25.9%-42.2%) and non-Hispanic blacks (31.4%-50.5%) than among non-Hispanic whites (47.7%-52.9%). Our fully adjusted regression model indicated lower dementia awareness among non-Hispanic blacks (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.94) and Hispanics (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.43-0.85), compared to non-Hispanic whites. Having more instrumental activity of daily living limitations (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.56-1.75) and living in a nursing home (OR = 2.78; 95% CI = 2.32-3.32) were associated with increased odds of subjects reporting being told about dementia by a physician. CONCLUSION Less than half of individuals with dementia reported being told by a physician about the condition. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with dementia may be unaware of their condition, despite higher dementia prevalence in these groups, compared to non-Hispanic whites. Dementia outreach programs should target diverse communities with disproportionately high disease prevalence and low awareness. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1763-1770, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanna Emerson
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica D Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Howard M Fillit
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allan T Daly
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikoletta Margaretos
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the future challenges of meeting care demands for the growing number of people living with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States with a particular emphasis on primary care. By mid-century, the number of Americans age 65 and older with Alzheimer's dementia may grow to 13.8 million. This represents a steep increase from the estimated 5.8 million Americans age 65 and older who have Alzheimer's dementia today. Official death certificates recorded 122,019 deaths from AD in 2018, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2018, deaths resulting from stroke, HIV and heart disease decreased, whereas reported deaths from Alzheimer's increased 146.2%. In 2019, more than 16 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.6 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias. This care is valued at nearly $244 billion, but its costs extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2020 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $305 billion. As the population of Americans living with Alzheimer's dementia increases, the burden of caring for that population also increases. These challenges are exacerbated by a shortage of dementia care specialists, which places an increasing burden on primary care physicians (PCPs) to provide care for people living with dementia. Many PCPs feel underprepared and inadequately trained to handle dementia care responsibilities effectively. This report includes recommendations for maximizing quality care in the face of the shortage of specialists and training challenges in primary care.
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Champlin BE. The informal caregiver's lived experience of being present with a patient who receives a diagnosis of dementia: A phenomenological inquiry. DEMENTIA 2018; 19:375-396. [PMID: 29771140 DOI: 10.1177/1471301218776780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article describes the lived experience of informal caregivers who accompany loved ones as the loved ones receive a diagnosis of dementia. Each of 12 informal caregivers participated in a face-to-face interview that was audiotaped and transcribed. Analysis of the interview text revealed seven constituents as central to the general structure of this experience: (a) having anticipated the diagnosis; (b) feeling relief; (c) feeling the gravitas of the words; (d) grieving the loss; (e) watching for the patient’s reaction; (f) accepting the diagnosis and taking action; and (g) committing to care. Implications for healthcare providers are discussed, with an emphasis on the need to be sensitive to the experience of both patients and informal caregivers when disclosing a diagnosis of dementia.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
Abstract
This report describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, including incidence and prevalence, mortality rates, costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. It also examines in detail the financial impact of Alzheimer's on families, including annual costs to families and the difficult decisions families must often make to pay those costs. An estimated 5.4 million Americans have Alzheimer's disease. By mid-century, the number of people living with Alzheimer's disease in the United States is projected to grow to 13.8 million, fueled in large part by the aging baby boom generation. Today, someone in the country develops Alzheimer's disease every 66 seconds. By 2050, one new case of Alzheimer's is expected to develop every 33 seconds, resulting in nearly 1 million new cases per year. In 2013, official death certificates recorded 84,767 deaths from Alzheimer's disease, making it the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death in Americans age ≥ 65 years. Between 2000 and 2013, deaths resulting from stroke, heart disease, and prostate cancer decreased 23%, 14%, and 11%, respectively, whereas deaths from Alzheimer's disease increased 71%. The actual number of deaths to which Alzheimer's disease contributes is likely much larger than the number of deaths from Alzheimer's disease recorded on death certificates. In 2016, an estimated 700,000 Americans age ≥ 65 years will die with Alzheimer's disease, and many of them will die because of the complications caused by Alzheimer's disease. In 2015, more than 15 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.1 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's and other dementias, a contribution valued at more than $221 billion. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias are more than two and a half times as great as payments for all beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are 19 times as great. Total payments in 2016 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age ≥ 65 years with dementia are estimated to be $236 billion. The costs of Alzheimer's care may place a substantial financial burden on families, who often have to take money out of their retirement savings, cut back on buying food, and reduce their own trips to the doctor. In addition, many family members incorrectly believe that Medicare pays for nursing home care and other types of long-term care. Such findings highlight the need for solutions to prevent dementia-related costs from jeopardizing the health and financial security of the families of people with Alzheimer's and other dementias.
Collapse
|
20
|
Morley JE, Morris JC, Berg-Weger M, Borson S, Carpenter BD, Del Campo N, Dubois B, Fargo K, Fitten LJ, Flaherty JH, Ganguli M, Grossberg GT, Malmstrom TK, Petersen RD, Rodriguez C, Saykin AJ, Scheltens P, Tangalos EG, Verghese J, Wilcock G, Winblad B, Woo J, Vellas B. Brain health: the importance of recognizing cognitive impairment: an IAGG consensus conference. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 16:731-9. [PMID: 26315321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment creates significant challenges for patients, their families and friends, and clinicians who provide their health care. Early recognition allows for diagnosis and appropriate treatment, education, psychosocial support, and engagement in shared decision-making regarding life planning, health care, involvement in research, and financial matters. An IAGG-GARN consensus panel examined the importance of early recognition of impaired cognitive health. Their major conclusion was that case-finding by physicians and health professionals is an important step toward enhancing brain health for aging populations throughout the world. This conclusion is in keeping with the position of the United States' Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that reimburses for detection of cognitive impairment as part the of Medicare Annual Wellness Visit and with the international call for early detection of cognitive impairment as a patient's right. The panel agreed on the following specific findings: (1) validated screening tests are available that take 3 to 7 minutes to administer; (2) a combination of patient- and informant-based screens is the most appropriate approach for identifying early cognitive impairment; (3) early cognitive impairment may have treatable components; and (4) emerging data support a combination of medical and lifestyle interventions as a potential way to delay or reduce cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Morley
- Divisions of Geriatric Medicine and Endocrinology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Marla Berg-Weger
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO
| | - Soo Borson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian D Carpenter
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Natalia Del Campo
- Institute of Aging, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Department of Neurology, Université Pierreet Marie Curie, Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Keith Fargo
- Scientific Programs and Outreach, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL
| | - L Jaime Fitten
- Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Geriatric Psychiatry, Greater Los Angeles VA, Sepulveda Campus, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joseph H Flaherty
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Mary Ganguli
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - George T Grossberg
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Geriatric Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Theodore K Malmstrom
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Ronald D Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Carroll Rodriguez
- Public Policy and Communications, Alzheimer's Association, St Louis, MO
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Philip Scheltens
- VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joe Verghese
- Division of Geriatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Gordon Wilcock
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bengt Winblad
- Division for Neurogeriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Department of NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Jean Woo
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bruno Vellas
- Department of Geriatrics, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and (select 8682 from (select(sleep(5)))aqxj)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
22
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 order by 1-- rkdf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
23
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 waitfor delay '0:0:5'-- bmov] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
24
|
|
25
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 order by 1-- bcpd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 waitfor delay '0:0:5'] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
33
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 2364=4691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
|
35
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 8336=8336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
36
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 8336=8336-- yvja] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
37
|
|
38
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 9592=(select 9592 from pg_sleep(5))-- pgrd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
39
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 9592=(select 9592 from pg_sleep(5))] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
40
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and (select 8682 from (select(sleep(5)))aqxj)-- zwlx] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
41
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 5109=2486-- lenk] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
42
|
|
43
|
Abstract
This report discusses the public health impact of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality rates, costs of care and the overall effect on caregivers and society. It also examines the challenges encountered by health care providers when disclosing an AD diagnosis to patients and caregivers. An estimated 5.3 million Americans have AD; 5.1 million are age 65 years, and approximately 200,000 are age <65 years and have younger onset AD. By mid-century, the number of people living with AD in the United States is projected to grow by nearly 10 million, fueled in large part by the aging baby boom generation. Today, someone in the country develops AD every 67 seconds. By 2050, one new case of AD is expected to develop every 33 seconds, resulting in nearly 1 million new cases per year, and the estimated prevalence is expected to range from 11 million to 16 million. In 2013, official death certificates recorded 84,767 deaths from AD, making AD the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death in Americans age 65 years. Between 2000 and 2013, deaths resulting from heart disease, stroke and prostate cancer decreased 14%, 23% and 11%, respectively, whereas deaths from AD increased 71%. The actual number of deaths to which AD contributes (or deaths with AD) is likely much larger than the number of deaths from AD recorded on death certificates. In 2015, an estimated 700,000 Americans age 65 years will die with AD, and many of them will die from complications caused by AD. In 2014, more than 15 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 17.9 billion hours of care to people with AD and other dementias, a contribution valued at more than $217 billion. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 years with AD and other dementias are more than two and a half times as great as payments for all beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are 19 times as great. Total payments in 2015 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 years with dementia are expected to be $226 billion. Among people with a diagnosis of AD or another dementia, fewer than half report having been told of the diagnosis by their health care provider. Though the benefits of a prompt, clear and accurate disclosure of an AD diagnosis are recognized by the medical profession, improvements to the disclosure process are needed. These improvements may require stronger support systems for health care providers and their patients.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication is affected by dementia, even in the early stages. Studies directly observing how patients, companions and healthcare professionals communicate have not yet been reviewed. METHODS Eight databases were searched, and hand searches of relevant journals and grey literature were performed up to August 2014. Two authors reviewed abstracts independently and collectively reviewed for agreement of inclusion. Findings were narratively synthesized. RESULTS 23 studies were identified observing: diagnostic, follow up, day center, primary care and research consent interactions. Companions were present in 14 studies. Three themes emerged: emotional impact of diagnosis, level of patient involvement and participant strategies to save face and cope with cognitive impairment. Eight studies observed diagnostic disclosure describing emotional reactions, with professionals using mitigating language and rarely checking patient understanding. Studies reported varying patient involvement, showing marginalization in primary care but not in assessments or diagnostic feedback. Patients used humor and metaphor to compensate for difficulties retrieving information and responding appropriately, suggesting preserved awareness of the pragmatics of interaction. Companion roles fluctuated between patient advocate and professional informant. Professionals encountered challenges adapting to heterogeneous patient groups with varying capabilities and needs. CONCLUSIONS Patient-companion-professional communication in dementia care raises various ethical questions: how to strike a balance between different communicative needs of patients and companions; clarity versus sensitivity in delivery of the diagnosis; and whether to minimize or expose interactional difficulties and misunderstanding to enrich patient understanding and involvement. Healthcare professionals need guidance in delivering a diagnosis and strategies to optimize patient and companion participation.
Collapse
|
45
|
Penders YWH, Albers G, Deliens L, Vander Stichele R, Van den Block L, De Groote Z, Brearly S, Caraceni A, Cohen J, Francke A, Harding R, Higginson I, Kaasa S, Linden K, Miccenesi G, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Pardon K, Pasman R, Pautux S, Payne S, Deliens L. Awareness of dementia by family carers of nursing home residents dying with dementia: a post-death study. Palliat Med 2015; 29:38-47. [PMID: 25037605 DOI: 10.1177/0269216314542261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality palliative care for people with dementia should be patient-centered, family-focused, and include well-informed and shared decision-making, as affirmed in a recent white paper on dementia from the European Association for Palliative Care. AIM To describe how often family carers of nursing home residents who died with dementia are aware that their relative has dementia, and study resident, family carer, and care characteristics associated with awareness. DESIGN Post-death study using random cluster sampling. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Structured questionnaires were completed by family carers, nursing staff, and general practitioners of deceased nursing home residents with dementia in Flanders, Belgium (2010). RESULTS Of 190 residents who died with dementia, 53.2% of family carers responded. In 28% of cases, family carers indicated they were unaware their relative had dementia. Awareness by family carers was related to more advanced stages of dementia 1 month before death (odds ratio = 5.4), with 48% of family carers being unaware when dementia was mild and 20% unaware when dementia was advanced. The longer the onset of dementia after admission to a nursing home, the less likely family carers were aware (odds ratio = 0.94). CONCLUSION Family carers are often unaware that their relative has dementia, that is, in one-fourth of cases of dementia and one-fifth of advanced dementia, posing considerable challenges for optimal care provision and end-of-life decision-making. Considering that family carers of residents who develop dementia later after admission to a nursing home are less likely to be aware, there is room for improving communication strategies toward family carers of nursing home residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda W H Penders
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gwenda Albers
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Vander Stichele
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|