Vision in a phase 3 trial of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis: relation to disability and quality of life

Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations.

RESULTS

The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.

Visual Impairment in Hemodialyzed Patients-An IVIS Study

Background and Objectives: The growing and aging population of hemodialysis patients has become increasingly disabled, with more complex comorbidities, and are older upon initiating dialysis. Visual impairment can adversely affect their quality of life and life satisfaction. Treatment evaluation should not only consider remission of the disease, but also the improvement of quality of life and life satisfaction. This is a single-center cross-sectional study. It was designed to evaluate visual impairment in hemodialyzed patients, its correlation with quality of life and life satisfaction, and its relationship to clinical outcomes in hemodialyzed patients. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis and aged 18 years or older were recruited from a single Dialysis Unit. The Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), WHOQOL-BREF, and Cantril Ladder questionnaires were utilized to assess both sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: It was found that, among all assessed variables (i.e., sex, marital status, level of education, months on hemodialysis, history of kidney transplantation, Kt/V, URR, and UF), only age and central venous catheter placement were positively correlated with IVIS scores, while arteriovenous fistula and willingness to become a kidney transplant recipient were negatively correlated. Furthermore, a comparison between patients with moderate and severe visual impairment yielded supplemental data indicating that individuals whose dialysis access was through a dialysis catheter and those ineligible or unwilling to undergo transplantation suffered more often from severe visual impairment. This finding may be attributed to age. Conclusions: Older patients were predominantly observed to experience visual impairment. Patients intending to receive a kidney transplant and whose dialysis access was through an arteriovenous fistula were less prone to visual impairment, compared to those who may be ineligible or unwilling to receive transplantation and those with hemodialysis catheters. This phenomenon can be attributed to age-related distinctions in patients' suitability for specific dialysis access and transplantation. Those reporting visual impairment gave lower ratings in all four domains of their quality of life (comprising physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) and in both present and anticipated five-year life satisfaction. More severe visual impairment was related to an additional reduction in physical health, social relationship, and environment domains, and in life satisfaction.

Where's the Vision? The Importance of Visual Outcomes in Neurologic Disorders: The 2021 H. Houston Merritt Lecture

Neurologists have long recognized the importance of the visual system in the diagnosis and monitoring of neurologic disorders. This is particularly true because approximately 50% of the brain's pathways subserve afferent and efferent aspects of vision. During the past 30 years, researchers and clinicians have further refined this concept to include investigation of the visual system for patients with specific neurologic diagnoses, including multiple sclerosis (MS), concussion, Parkinson disease (PD), and conditions along the spectrum of Alzheimer disease (AD, mild cognitive impairment, and subjective cognitive decline). This review highlights the visual "toolbox" that has been developed over the past 3 decades and beyond to capture both structural and functional aspects of vision in neurologic disease. Although the efforts to accelerate the emphasis on structure-function relationships in neurologic disorders began with MS during the early 2000s, such investigations have broadened to recognize the need for outcomes of visual pathway structure, function, and quality of life for clinical trials of therapies across the spectrum of neurologic disorders. This review begins with a patient case study highlighting the importance using the most modern technologies for visual pathway assessment, including optical coherence tomography. We emphasize that both structural and functional tools for vision testing can be used in parallel to detect what might otherwise be subclinical events or markers of visual and, perhaps, more global neurologic decline. Such measures will be critical because clinical trials and therapies become more available across the neurologic disease spectrum.

Postural stability is a valid and meaningful disability metric in progressive MS with potential for use in neuroprotective therapy trials

BACKGROUND

Balance impairment is observed in up to 70% of people with MS (pwMS) and worsens with disease progression. Posturography using a force platform is the current gold standard in the measurement of balance. However, posturography has not been adequately studied or widely accepted for use as a disability outcome measure for pwMS. Importantly, the recent emergence of both successful and failed neuroprotective therapy trials in progressive MS has emphasised the need for new disability outcome measures for people with progressive MS. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical validity, reliability and feasibility of posturography as a disability metric in progressive MS.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We recruited 73 people with progressive MS (age 18-65 years, EDSS 3.5-6.0). Participants stood in the centre of a force platform, feet comfortably apart, under various conditions: (i) eyes open (EO), (ii) eyes closed (EC) - a single task, each lasting ninety seconds; and simultaneous EO with a cognitive test: (iii) N-Back, a three-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse when two identical letters were displayed consecutively on a screen, (iv) Sustained Attention Response Task, a five-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse for every number "1″ to "9″ except "3″ - i.e., dual-tasks. Additionally, we performed a battery of validated physical and cognitive outcome measures. Posturographic data was processed using Matlab. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. We used multiple linear regression modelling to determine whether significant univariate correlations between posturography and clinical metrics were independent of covariates that may influence the associations seen. A two-tailed significance level of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

Of 73 participants, mean age 52.4 (8.5) years, mean MS disease duration 13.8 (10.3) years, median EDSS 5.0 (IQR 4.0-6.0), 44 (60.4%) were female. EO-Path-Length independently predicted upper extremity function (9-Hole-Peg-Test) with a larger effect size (adjusted R²=20.0%, p = 0.001) than that for walking measures (Timed 25-Foot Walk, adjusted R²=1.6%, p = 0.01; Two-Minute Walk Test, adjusted R²=7.2%, p = 0.002), while controlling for age, disease duration, height, weight, and sex. The addition of EO-Mediolateral-Displacement to the MS Functional Composite (MSFC) created a four-component z-score that increased the variance explained for quality of life (QOL) by 62.1%. Postural stability was significantly lower with mediolateral vs anteroposterior direction of sway, removal of vision, increased body weight, male sex, and fampridine use. Postural stability improved during dual-tasks compared to EO single task. Posturography detected significant worsening of balance over a single prolonged stance.

CONCLUSION

Postural stability independently predicted a wide range of clinical metrics including upper extremity function, walking ability, cognition and QOL, therefore establishing construct and concurrent validity as a disability outcome measure for people with progressive MS. Additionally, posturography is a quantitative, non-invasive, quick-and-easy-to-administer, and highly sensitive device, demonstrating its high feasibility for use as a time- and resource-efficient disability metric in neuroprotective therapy trials for progressive MS.

Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations.

RESULTS

The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.

Promising recovery biomarkers after first event acute demyelinating optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Acute demyelinating optic neuritis is often a first episode of subsequent CNS demyelinating disease, most frequently multiple sclerosis (MS). The majority of the patients have substantial recovery of the high contrast visual acuity (HCVA) and 30-2 perimetry, but reduced contrast sensitivity persists in 56% of eyes after an episode of optic neuritis. Cross sectional studies of MS patients show low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) correlates modestly with RNFL thickness and macula ganglion cell +IPL layer (GCL) thickness. Considering the potential severity of the vision deficits at onset, and GCL thinning at outcome, we hypothesized 10-2 perimetry and LCVA deficits would be frequent following an episode of optic neuritis.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 32 eyes of 32 patients (9 men, 23 women, age 34 years ± 10) with first time acute optic neuritis. We measured LCVA 2.5% (# letters seen), GCL thickness and loss, and 10-2 mean deviation (MD in decibels, dB) within 15 days from symptoms onset and at six months. The 10-2 threshold perimetry, a novel assessment in the MS research field, included to further characterize central vision function. We used correlation analysis to assess associations between GCL thickness and thinning and 10-2 perimetry as well as LCVA 2.5% at six months.

RESULTS

Compared to fellow eyes we found significant residual LCVA deficits in 28/32 study eyes at 6 months with 12.6 ± 15.8 letters seen, p=0.001). Similarly, 10-2 MD threshold perimetry in the study eyes at 6 months showed significant difference relative to the fellow eyes, p=0.01. In regards to GCL changes at 6 months, we found statistically significant reduction of the GCL thickness in the study eyes relative to the fellow eyes (study eyes 69.6 ± 9.6 µm, fellow eyes 82.7 ± 4.7 µm, p=0.001), with thinning present in 29/32 eyes. The mean GCL thinning at 6 months in the study eyes was 12.4 ± 8.4 µm. Correlation analysis of associations between primary outcome measures at 6 months showed significant relationship between GCL thickness and 10-2 MD threshold perimetry (0.43, p = 0.015) but not with LCVA. At six months, the mean GCL thinning strongly correlated with the 10-2 MD (-0.60, p=0.01) and moderately with LCVA (-0.46, p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

GCL thickness is the best structural and LCVA and 10-2 MD are sensitive functional measures for determining residual deficits due to optic neuritis.  The 10-2 MD correlates best with the outcome GCL thickness and loss. Our findings also suggest that 10-2 threshold perimetry and macular GCL can provide functional and structural promising biomarker signals to explore neuro-protective research.

Technology-enabled comprehensive characterization of multiple sclerosis in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Objective and longitudinal measurements of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are desired in order to monitor disease status and response to disease-modifying and symptomatic therapies. Technology-enabled comprehensive assessment of MS patients, including neuroperformance tests (NPTs), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and MRI, is incorporated into clinical care at our center. The relationships of each NPT with PROMs and MRI measures in a real-world setting are incompletely studied, particularly in larger datasets.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the utility of comprehensive neurological assessment and determine the association between NPTs, PROMs, and quantitative MRI measures in a large MS clinical cohort.

METHODS

NPTs (processing speed [PST], contrast sensitivity [CST], manual dexterity [MDT], and walking speed [WST]) and physical disability-related PROMs (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders [Neuro-QoL], Patient Determined Disease Steps [PDDS], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 [PROMIS-10] physical) were collected as part of routine clinical care. Fully-automated MRI analysis calculated T2-lesion volume (T2LV), whole brain fraction (WBF), thalamic volume (TV), and cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (CA) for brain MRIs completed within 3 months of a clinic visit during which NPTs and PROMs were assessed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients evaluated the cross-sectional associations of NPTs with PROMs and MRI measures. Linear regression was utilized to determine which combination of clinical characteristics, patient demographics, MRI measures, and PROMs best cross-sectionally explained each NPT result.

RESULTS

997 unique patients (age 47.7 ± 11.4 years, 71.8% female) who underwent assessments over a 2-year period were included. Correlations among NPTs and PROMs were moderate. PST correlations were strongest for Neuro-QoL upper extremity (NQ-UE) (Spearman's rho = 0.43) and lower extremity (NQ-LE) (0.47). CST correlations were strongest for NQ-UE (0.33), NQ-LE (0.36), and PDDS (-0.31). MDT correlations were strongest for NQ-UE (-0.53), NQ-LE (-0.54), and PDDS (0.53). WST correlations were strongest for PDDS (0.64) and NQ-LE (-0.65). NPTs also had moderate correlations with MRI metrics, the strongest of which were observed with PST (with T2LV (-0.44) and WBF (0.49)). Spearman's rho for other NPT-MRI correlations ranged from 0.23 to 0.36. Linear regression identified age, disease duration, PROMIS-10 physical, NQ-UE, NQ-LE, T2LV and WBF as significant cross-sectional explanatory variables for PST (adjusted R²=0.46). For CST, significant variables included age and NQ-LE (adjusted R² = 0.30). For MDT, significant variables included PDDS, PROMIS-10 physical, NQ-UE, NQ-LE, T2LV, and WBF (adjusted R²=0.37). For WST, significant variables included sex, PDDS, NQ-LE, T2LV, and CA (adjusted R²=0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired performance on NPTs correlated with worse physical disability-related PROMs and MRI disease severity, but the strongest cross-sectional explanatory variables for each NPT component varied. This study supports the use of comprehensive, objective quantification of MS status in clinical and research settings. Future longitudinal analyses can determine predictors of treatment response and disability worsening.

Evolution of Visual Outcomes in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies

: BACKGROUND:: The visual pathways are increasingly recognized as an ideal model to study neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are validated measures of function and structure in MS. In fact, LCLA was the topic of a recent review by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC) to qualify this visual measure as a primary or secondary clinical trial endpoint with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory agencies. This review focuses on the use of LCLA and OCT measures as outcomes in clinical trials to date of MS disease-modifying therapies.

METHODS

A Pubmed search using the specific key words "optical coherence tomography," "low-contrast letter acuity," "multiple sclerosis," and "clinical trials" was performed. An additional search on the clinicaltrials.gov website with the same key words was used to find registered clinical trials of MS therapies that included these visual outcome measures.

RESULTS

As demonstrated by multiple clinical trials, LCLA and OCT measures are sensitive to treatment effects in MS. LCLA has been used in many clinical trials to date, and findings suggest that 7 letters of LCLA at the 2.5% contrast level are meaningful change. Few clinical trials using the benefits of OCT have been performed, although results of observational studies have solidified the ability of OCT to assess change in retinal structure. Continued accrual of clinical trial and observational data is needed to validate the use of OCT in clinical trials, but preliminary work suggests that an intereye difference in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of 5-6 μm is a clinically meaningful threshold that identifies an optic nerve lesion in MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual impairment represents a significant component of overall disability in MS. LCLA and OCT enhance the detection of visual pathway injury and can be used as measures of axonal and neuronal integrity. Continued investigation is ongoing to further incorporate these vision-based assessments into clinical trials of MS therapies.

Retinal measurements predict 10-year disability in multiple sclerosis

Objective

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐derived measures of the retina correlate with disability and cortical gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, whether such measures predict long‐term disability is unknown. We evaluated whether a single OCT and visual function assessment predict the disability status 10 years later.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2008, 172 people with MS underwent Stratus time domain‐OCT imaging [160 with measurement of total macular volume (TMV)] and high and low‐contrast letter acuity (LCLA) testing (n = 150; 87%). All participants had Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments at baseline and at 10‐year follow‐up. We applied generalized linear regression models to assess associations between baseline TMV, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, and LCLA with 10‐year EDSS scores (linear) and with clinically significant EDSS worsening (binary), adjusting for age, sex, optic neuritis history, and baseline disability status.

Results

In multivariable models, lower baseline TMV was associated with higher 10‐year EDSS scores (mean increase in EDSS of 0.75 per 1 mm³ loss in TMV (mean difference = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.11–1.39; P = 0.02). In analyses using tertiles, individuals in the lowest tertile of baseline TMV had an average 0.86 higher EDSS scores at 10 years (mean difference = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.23–1.48) and had over 3.5‐fold increased odds of clinically significant EDSS worsening relative to those in the highest tertile of baseline TMV (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.30–9.82; P_trend = 0.008). pRNFL and LCLA predicted the 10‐year EDSS scores only in univariate models.

Interpretation

Lower baseline TMV measured by OCT significantly predicts higher disability at 10 years, even after accounting for baseline disability status.

Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES) in MS: Evaluation of a new visual test of rapid picture naming

OBJECTIVE

The Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES) is a test of rapid picture naming that is under investigation for concussion. MULES captures an extensive visual network, including pathways for eye movements, color perception, memory and object recognition. The purpose of this study was to introduce the MULES to visual assessment of patients with MS, and to examine associations with other tests of afferent and efferent visual function.

METHODS

We administered the MULES in addition to binocular measures of low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA), high-contrast visual acuity (VA) and the King-Devick (K-D) test of rapid number naming in an MS cohort and in a group of disease-free controls.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients with MS (median age 36 years, range 20-72, 64% female) and 22 disease-free controls (median age 34 years, range 19-59, 57% female), MULES test times were greater (worse) among the patients (60.0 vs. 40.0 s). Accounting for age, MS vs. control status was a predictor of MULES test times (P = .01, logistic regression). Faster testing times were noted among patients with MS who had greater (better) performance on binocular LCLA at 2.5% contrast (P < .001, linear regression, accounting for age), binocular high-contrast VA (P < .001), and K-D testing (P < .001). Both groups demonstrated approximately 10-s improvements in MULES test times between trials 1 and 2 (P < .0001, paired t-tests).

CONCLUSION

The MULES test, a complex task of rapid picture naming involves an extensive visual network that captures eye movements, color perception and the characterization of objects. Color recognition, a key component of this novel assessment, is early in object processing and requires area V4 and the inferior temporal projections. MULES scores reflect performance of LCLA, a widely-used measure of visual function in MS clinical trials. These results provide evidence that the MULES test can add efficient visual screening to the assessment of patients with MS.

Agreement analysis comparing iPad LCVA and Sloan testing in multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Visual symptoms are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) testing using Sloan charts has demonstrated increased sensitivity for visual deficits compared to high-contrast acuity testing. Computerized testing of visual acuity may facilitate use in the clinic setting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement between an iPad-based and Sloan testing of LCVA in a cohort of MS patients.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with relapsing-remitting MS were enrolled after providing informed written consent at Partners MS Center, Brigham and Women's hospital. Monocular LCVA was measured using retroilluminated Sloan chart and iPad-based LogMAR chart. Number of correct letters and agreement between two measurements were assessed for each eye using Bland-Altman analysis and paired t-test.

RESULTS

For both eyes, there was no significant difference in number correct between the two measurements using a paired t-test, and there was high correlation between two measurements (oculus dextrus (OD) r = 0.89, p < 0.001; oculus sinister (OS) r = 0.78, p < 0.001). The limits of agreement were -7.9 to +8.5 letters for the right eye and -10.9 to +11.2 letters for the left eye.

CONCLUSION

An iPad-based LCVA test shows good agreement with Sloan testing in MS patients.

Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis

Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) has emerged as the leading outcome measure to assess visual disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As visual dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of MS, sensitive visual outcome measures are important in examining the effect of treatment. Low-contrast acuity captures visual loss not seen in high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) measurements. These issues are addressed by the MS Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), including representatives from advocacy organizations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), academic institutions, and industry partners along with persons living with MS. MSOAC goals are acceptance and qualification by regulators of performance outcomes that are highly reliable and valid, practical, cost-effective, and meaningful to persons with MS. A critical step is elucidation of clinically relevant benchmarks, well-defined degrees of disability, and gradients of change that are clinically meaningful. This review shows that MS and disease-free controls have similar median HCVA, while MS patients have significantly lower LCLA. Deficits in LCLA and vision-specific quality of life are found many years after an episode of acute optic neuritis, even when HCVA has recovered. Studies reveal correlations between LCLA and the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), visual evoked potential (VEP), electroretinogram (ERG), pupillary function, and King-Devick testing. This review also concludes that a 7-point change in LCLA is clinically meaningful. The overall goal of this review is to describe and characterize the LCLA metric for research and clinical use among persons with MS.

Assessing the Value of Treatment to Address Various Symptoms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study

BACKGROUND

Although it is well recognized that people with multiple sclerosis (MS) may experience impairments in addition to limited mobility, there has been little effort to study their relative importance to patients with the condition. The objective of this study was to assess patient preferences for addressing various MS symptoms.

METHODS

This study was conducted at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. We developed a national online survey of MS patients and neurologists to estimate the value each group places on treating specific MS symptoms. Each respondent was presented with two randomly selected scenarios with different symptoms and treatments. MS patients were asked about their own preferences, whereas neurologists were asked to consider what a patient of theirs would do or think in each scenario. We used a bidding game approach to elicit respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for the treatments.

RESULTS

To treat mobility alone, WTP for MS patients averaged US$410-US$520 per month, depending on the scenario. For paired symptoms, MS patients would pay most to treat mobility and upper limb function (US$525/month) or mobility and cognition (US$514/month), somewhat less to treat mobility and eyesight (US$445/month), and least to treat mobility and fatigue (US$371/month). Patient WTP values increased with income and education. Neurologists believed their patients would be willing to pay US$216-US$249 per month to treat mobility alone, depending on the scenario. For paired symptoms, neurologists believed patients would pay most to treat mobility and fatigue (US$263/month) and least to treat mobility and upper limb function (US$177/month).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest MS patients may value one outcome (e.g., improved arm and hand coordination) over another (e.g., less fatigue). Further, MS patients and neurologists may rank the importance of treating various symptoms differently. Given this potential mismatch, it is crucial for MS patients and their clinicians to discuss treatment priorities that take into account patient preferences.

Binocular low-contrast letter acuity and the symbol digit modalities test improve the ability of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite to predict disease in pediatric multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Outcome measures to capture disability, such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), were developed to enhance outcome measurements for clinical trials in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). The MSFC initially included three components: a timed 25-foot walk [T25FW], 9-hole peg test [9HPT], and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task [PASAT]. Modifications to the original MSFC, such as adding binocular low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) or substituting the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) for the PASAT, improved the capacity to capture neurologic impairment in adults. Similar outcome scales for pediatric MS have not yet been established.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the three-component MSFC or a modified MSFC with LCLA and the SDMT better identifies neurological deficits in pediatric MS.

METHODS

We evaluated 5 measures (T25FW, 9HPT, Children's PASAT [ChiPASAT], SDMT, and binocular LCLA [Sloan charts, 1.25% contrast]) in children with MS (disease onset <18 years) and healthy controls. To be able to compare measures whose scores have different scales, Z-scores were also created for each test based on the numbers of standard deviations from a control group mean, and these individual scale scores were combined to create composite scores. Logistic regression models, accounting for age, were used to determine whether the standard 3-component MSFC or modified versions (including 4 or 5 metrics) best distinguished children with MS from controls.

RESULTS

Twenty pediatric-onset MS subjects, aged 6-21 years, and thirteen healthy controls, aged 6-19 years, were enrolled. MS subjects demonstrated worse scores on the 9HPT (p=0.004) and SDMT (p=0.001), but not the 25FTW (adjusted for height, p=0.63) or the ChiPASAT (p=0.10): all comparisons adjusted for age. Decreased (worse) binocular LCLA scores were associated with MS (vs. control status, p=0.03, logistic regression; p=0.08, accounting for age). The MSFC composite score for the traditional 3 components did not differ between the groups (p=0.28). Replacing the ChiPASAT with the SDMT (OR 0.72, p=0.05) better distinguished MS from controls. A modified MSFC-4 with the SDMT replacing the ChiPASAT and including binocular 1.25% LCLA had the greatest capacity to distinguish pediatric MS from controls (OR 0.89, p=0.04, logistic regression). Including all 5 metrics as a composite MSFC-5 did not improve the model (p=0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

A modified MSFC (25FTW, 9HPT, SMDT, and binocular 1.25% LCLA) is more sensitive than the traditional MSFC or its components to capture the subtle impairments that characterize pediatric MS and should be validated in order to be considered for future pediatric MS trials.