Effort to perceive the position of one visual horizontal line relative to another appearing close causes an earlier postural response to backward perturbation

Sympathetic Response to Postural Perturbation in Stance

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate whether the sympathetic response to perturbation in stance represents multiple mental responses, whether perturbation-induced fear of fall is one of the mental responses, and whether the sympathetic response is task specific. While healthy humans maintained stance, the support surface of the feet translated in the forward or backward direction. The phasic electrodermal response (EDR), representing the sympathetic response, appeared 1–1.5 s after the support surface translation. Mostly, perturbation-induced EDRs comprised one peak, but some EDRs were comprised of two peaks. The onset latency of the two-peak EDR was much shorter than that of the one-peak EDR. The second peak latency of the two-peak EDR was similar to the peak latency of the one-peak EDR, indicating that the first peak of the two-peak EDR was an additional component preceding the one-peak EDR. This finding supports a view that perturbation-induced EDR in stance sometimes represents multiple mental responses. The amplitude of the EDR had a positive and significant correlation with fear, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance partially represents perturbation-induced fear of fall. The EDR amplitude was dependent on the translation amplitude and direction, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance is a task specific response. The EDR appeared earlier when the participants prepared to answer a question or when the perturbation was self-triggered, indicating that adding cognitive load induces earlier perturbation-induced mental responses.

The Role of Predictability of Perturbation in Control of Posture: A Scoping Review

Efficient maintenance of posture depends on the ability of humans to predict consequences of a perturbation applied to their body. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature on the role of predictability of a body perturbation in control of posture. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria were studies of adults participating in experiments involving body perturbations, reported outcomes of posture and balance control, and studies published in English. Sixty-three studies were selected. The reviewed information resources included the availability of sensory information and the exposure to perturbations in different sequences of perturbation magnitudes or directions. This review revealed that people use explicit and implicit information resources for the prediction of perturbations. Explicit information consists of sensory information related to perturbation properties and timing, whereas implicit information involves learning from repetitive exposures to perturbations of the same properties.

Time Window of Perturbation-Induced Response Triggered by Ankle Motion and Body Sway above the Ankle

We determined the precise time windows of the electromyographic (EMG) response components triggered by ankle motion and by body sway above the ankle. A support surface under the feet of healthy young adult participants in the quiet stance was moved in translation. The EMG response component triggered by body displacement above the ankle began at 95–100 ms and ended 145–155 ms after the onset of the support surface translation. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 35–50 ms and ended 110–115 ms after the onset of the translation in the soleus muscle, indicating that the response component began at a time similar to the short-latency response. In contrast, the response component in the gastrocnemius muscle began noticeably after that. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 75–85 ms and ended 125–135 ms after the onset of the translation in the gastrocnemius muscle. Our findings indicate that the threshold of the early response component to the somatic sensation of the ankle motion in the soleus muscle is lower than that in the gastrocnemius muscle. The response component triggered by the ankle motion continued long after the end of ankle dorsiflexion, indicating that the early component is mediated not only by the monosynaptic stretch reflex pathway but also by the polysynaptic pathway.

Effect of Time and Direction Preparation on Ankle Muscle Response During Backward Translation of a Support Surface in Stance

This study investigated the effect of the time and direction preparation on the electromyographic (EMG) response of the ankle extensor to the backward translation of the support surface in stance. Fifteen healthy adult males aged 35.9 ± 6.2 years participated in this study. In the constant session, the interval between the warning cue and the onset of the backward support surface translation was constant. In the random time session, the interval was randomly assigned in each trial, but the direction was backward across the trials. In the random direction session, the direction was randomly assigned in each trial, but the interval was constant. The EMG amplitude in the time epochs 100-175 ms after translation onset in the random time session was significantly greater than that in the constant session in the soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles. The EMG amplitude in the time epochs 120-185 ms after translation onset in the random direction session was significantly greater than that in the constant session in the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles. This finding indicates that time and direction preparation reduces the late component of the ankle EMG response to backward translation of the support surface. This finding is explained by the supposed process through which uncertainty of the upcoming event causes disinhibition of response or by how time and direction preparation optimizes the magnitude of the long-latency response mediated by the transcortical pathway.

Effects of Internal and External Attentional Focus on Postural Response to a Sliding Stance Surface

The present study examined whether an internal or external attentional focus would affect participants’ feet-in-place balance response to postural stance perturbations. A movable platform automatically slid forward or backward while healthy participants stood on it and (a) performed no cognitive activity (control), (b) focused on the pelvis or upper body sway (internal focus), (c) memorized a number displayed immediately before the platform slid (external focus), or (d) kept the equilibrium of an unstable cylinder over the arm (external focus). The forward displacement of the pelvis induced by the platform sliding forward was smaller when participants focused on their pelvic sway, although such effect was absent when they focused on their upper body sway, indicating that the internal focus was effective for the postural response when attention was paid to the pelvic sway. Regarding an external attention focus, the forward displacement of the pelvis induced by the platform sliding forward was smaller when participants focused on the equilibrium of an unstable object over the arm, but this effect was absent when they focused on the number, indicating that an external focus was only effective when the unstable object focused upon was relevant to the equilibrium of one’s own body. No attentional intervention was effective during backward sliding of the support surface, indicating that central set for responding to postural perturbation depends on the direction of the postural perturbation.