Safety of the electroconvulsive therapy-ziprasidone combination

The Incidence of Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Headache: A Systematic Review

Headache is a common side effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), but reports on its incidence vary widely. A broad array of treatment regimens have been proposed in the literature. The pathophysiology of post-ECT headache is unclear but a vascular origin has been suggested. A systematic literature search was executed in PubMed and Embase to identify relevant articles. Articles were screened on title, abstract, and full text according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study characteristics and results concerning the incidence of post-ECT headache were extracted, and a weighted mean incidence was calculated. Forty-seven relevant articles were found, of which 36 reported on the incidence of post-ECT headache in patients and 9 on the incidence in sessions. The incidence of post-ECT headache varied greatly in the literature. The weighted mean incidence in patients was 32.8%, as 786 of a total population of 2399 patients experienced headache. The weighted mean incidence in sessions was between 9.4% (246 of 2604 sessions) and 12.1% (236/1958 sessions). The variation in incidences of post-ECT headache found might be due to different methods of measuring headache, different study designs, and different drugs used for anesthesia. The mean-weighted incidence of post-ECT headache in patients was 32.8% and in sessions between 9.4% and 12.1%.

Effectiveness and clinical predictors of response to combined ECT and antipsychotic therapy in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and dominant negative symptoms

The effectiveness and predictors of response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) combined with antipsychotics (AP) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients with the dominance of negative symptoms (TRS-NS) have not been studied systematically so far. 29 patients aged 21-55 years diagnosed with TRS-NS underwent ECT combined with antipsychotics (ECT+AP). Prior to the ECT, the symptom profile and severity were evaluated using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Demographic and medical data was collected; ECT parameters and pharmacotherapy results were evaluated. After the combined ECT+AP therapy a significant decrease in symptom severity was found. A response to treatment was achieved by 60% of patients. The greatest reductions were obtained in general and positive PANSS subscale (median change: 11 and 7 pts.) and the smallest, but still significant, ones in negative symptoms subscale (median: 3.5 pts.). Patients who responded to ECT+AP demonstrated a significantly shorter duration of the current episode in comparison with patients who did not experience at least a 25% reduction in symptom severity (median: 4 vs. 8 months). A combination of ECT and antipsychotic therapy can provide a useful treatment option for patients with TRS-NS. The only significant predictor of response to treatment was a shorter duration of the current episode.

The use of ECT and MST in treating depression

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been used clinically since 1938. Its most common use is in the treatment of depression: first line treatment where rapid recovery is a priority, but more frequently as an effective treatment for patients who do not respond to pharmacological and psychological approaches. Whilst it is widely hailed as an effective treatment, concerns about its effect on cognition remain. The development of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) over the past decade has attempted to devise a therapy with comparable efficacy to ECT, but without the associated cognitive side effects. The rationale for this is that MST uses magnetic fields to induce seizures in the cortex, without electrical stimulation of brain structures involved with memory. MST has been used successfully in the treatment of depression, yet there is a dearth of literature in comparison with ECT. We present a systematic review of the literature on ECT (from 2009-2011) and MST (from 2001-2011).