Modelling glioma progression, mass effect and intracranial pressure in patient anatomy

CT brain interpretation in paediatric trauma

The management of head trauma is an essential component of working in Emergency Medicine, be it a paediatric, adult or mixed emergency department. Between 33% and 50% of the 1.4 million people who attend UK emergency departments (ED) annually with a head injury are children. Patient outcomes in this cohort are strongly associated with rapid identification and treatment of intracranial pathology. The management of pathologies such as expanding intracranial haemorrhage and raised intracranial pressure requires urgent medical and neurosurgical treatment. This is facilitated by rapid interpretation of CT brain images in the ED. In this paper, we discuss the approach to interpretation of a CT brain following a traumatic head injury. While this is not a substitute for a formal radiologist report, being able to identify significant abnormalities may help you, as the treating clinician, to identify and manage any acute life threats; engage and potentiate discussion with your neurosurgical team and expedite the potential transfer and treatment of your patient.

Revolutionizing Glioblastoma Treatment: A Comprehensive Overview of Modern Therapeutic Approaches

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in the adult population, with an average survival of 12.1 to 14.6 months. The standard treatment, combining surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is not as efficient as we would like. However, the current possibilities are no longer limited to the standard therapies due to rapid advancements in biotechnology. New methods enable a more precise approach by targeting individual cells and antigens to overcome cancer. For the treatment of glioblastoma, these are gamma knife therapy, proton beam therapy, tumor-treating fields, EGFR and VEGF inhibitors, multiple RTKs inhibitors, and PI3K pathway inhibitors. In addition, the increasing understanding of the role of the immune system in tumorigenesis and the ability to identify tumor-specific antigens helped to develop immunotherapies targeting GBM and immune cells, including CAR-T, CAR-NK cells, dendritic cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Each of the described methods has its advantages and disadvantages and faces problems, such as the inefficient crossing of the blood-brain barrier, various neurological and systemic side effects, and the escape mechanism of the tumor. This work aims to present the current modern treatments of glioblastoma.

Engineered smart materials for RNA based molecular therapy to treat Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy of the central nervous system (CNS) that remains incurable despite the multitude of improvements in cancer therapeutics. The conventional chemo and radiotherapy post-surgery have only been able to improve the prognosis slightly; however, the development of resistance and/or tumor recurrence is almost inevitable. There is a pressing need for adjuvant molecular therapies that can successfully and efficiently block tumor progression. During the last few decades, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as key players in regulating various hallmarks of cancer including that of GBM. The levels of many ncRNAs are dysregulated in cancer, and ectopic modulation of their levels by delivering antagonists or overexpression constructs could serve as an attractive option for cancer therapy. The therapeutic potential of several types of ncRNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, has been validated in both in vitro and in vivo models of GBM. However, the delivery of these RNA-based therapeutics is highly challenging, especially to the tumors of the brain as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) poses as a major obstacle, among others. Also, since RNA is extremely fragile in nature, careful considerations must be met while designing a delivery agent. In this review we have shed light on how ncRNA therapy can overcome the limitations of its predecessor conventional therapy with an emphasis on smart nanomaterials that can aide in the safe and targeted delivery of nucleic acids to treat GBM. Additionally, critical gaps that currently exist for successful transition from viral to non-viral vector delivery systems have been identified. Finally, we have provided a perspective on the future directions, potential pathways, and target areas for achieving rapid clinical translation of, RNA-based macromolecular therapy to advance the effective treatment of GBM and other related diseases.

Retrospective longitudinal assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with malignant glioma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a tumor with rapid growth and a possible relationship to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). High ICP may not always be associated with clinical signs. A non-invasive technique for assessment of ICP is measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Identifying patients who need immediate intervention is of importance in neuro-oncological care. The goal of this study is to assess the available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with GBM with respect to pre- and postoperative ONSD.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective data analysis was performed on all patients operated for GBM at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2020. Two pre and one postoperative MRI had to be available. Clinical data and ONSD at multiple time points were analyzed and correlated, as well as preoperative volumetrics.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Clinical signs of elevated ICP were seen in 25.4% (n = 17), while significant perifocal edema was present in 67.2% (n = 45) of patients. Clinical signs of preoperatively elevated ICP were associated with significantly elevated ONSD at diagnosis (p < 0.001) as well as preoperative tumor volume (p < 0.001). Significant perifocal edema at the time of diagnosis was associated with elevated ONSD (p = 0.029) and higher tumor volume (p = 0.003). In patients with significant edema, ONSD increased significantly between preoperative MRIs (p = 0.003/005). In patients with clinical signs of raised ICP, ONSD also increased, whereas it was stable in asymptomatic patients (yes: 5.01+/-4.17 to 5.83+/-0.55 mm, p = 0.010, no: 5.17+/-0.46 mm to 5.38+/-0.41 mm, p = 0.81). A significant increase of ONSD from diagnosis to preoperative MRI and a significant decrease until 3 months postoperatively were observed (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ONSD might help identify high ICP in patients with GBM. In this first-of-its kind study, we observed a significant increase of ONSD preoperatively, likely associated with edema. Postoperatively, ONSD decreased significantly until 3 months after surgery and increased again at 12 months. Further prospective data collection is warranted.

Glioma diagnosis and therapy: Current challenges and nanomaterial-based solutions

Glioma is often referred to as one of the most dreadful central nervous system (CNS)-specific tumors with rapidly-proliferating cancerous glial cells, accounting for nearly half of the brain tumors at an annual incidence rate of 30-80 per a million population. Although glioma treatment remains a significant challenge for researchers and clinicians, the rapid development of nanomedicine provides tremendous opportunities for long-term glioma therapy. However, several obstacles impede the development of novel therapeutics, such as the very tight blood-brain barrier (BBB), undesirable hypoxia, and complex tumor microenvironment (TME). Several efforts have been dedicated to exploring various nanoformulations for improving BBB permeation and precise tumor ablation to address these challenges. Initially, this article briefly introduces glioma classification and various pathogenic factors. Further, currently available therapeutic approaches are illustrated in detail, including traditional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical practices. Then, different innovative treatment strategies, such as tumor-treating fields, gene therapy, immunotherapy, and phototherapy, are emphasized. In conclusion, we summarize the article with interesting perspectives, providing suggestions for future glioma diagnosis and therapy improvement.