1
|
Long S, Guzyk M, Perez Vidakovics L, Han X, Sun R, Wang M, Panas MD, Urgard E, Coquet JM, Merits A, Achour A, McInerney GM. SARS-CoV-2 N protein recruits G3BP to double membrane vesicles to promote translation of viral mRNAs. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10607. [PMID: 39638802 PMCID: PMC11621422 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54996-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3-domain-binding proteins (G3BP) are critical for the formation of stress granules (SGs) through their RNA- and ribosome-binding properties. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein exhibits strong binding affinity for G3BP and inhibits infection-induced SG formation soon after infection. To study the impact of the G3BP-N interaction on viral replication and pathogenesis in detail, we generated a mutant SARS-CoV-2 (RATA) that specifically lacks the G3BP-binding motif in the N protein. RATA triggers a stronger and more persistent SG response in infected cells, showing reduced replication across various cell lines, and greatly reduced pathogenesis in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice. At early times of infection, G3BP and WT N protein strongly colocalise with dsRNA and with non-structural protein 3 (nsp3), a component of the pore complex in double membrane vesicles (DMVs) from which nascent viral RNA emerges. Furthermore, G3BP-N complexes promote highly localized translation of viral mRNAs in the immediate vicinity of the DMVs and thus contribute to efficient viral gene expression and replication. In contrast, G3BP is absent from the DMVs in cells infected with RATA and translation of viral mRNAs is less efficient. This work provides a fuller understanding of the multifunctional roles of G3BP in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siwen Long
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mykhailo Guzyk
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura Perez Vidakovics
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xiao Han
- Department of Medicine Solna, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute Solna, Solna, Sweden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renhua Sun
- Department of Medicine Solna, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute Solna, Solna, Sweden
| | - Megan Wang
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marc D Panas
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Egon Urgard
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Leo Foundation Skin Immunology Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jonathan M Coquet
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Leo Foundation Skin Immunology Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andres Merits
- Institute of Bioengineering, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Adnane Achour
- Department of Medicine Solna, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute Solna, Solna, Sweden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerald M McInerney
- Division of Virology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liboy-Lugo JM, Espinoza CA, Sheu-Gruttadauria J, Park JE, Xu A, Jowhar Z, Gao AL, Carmona-Negrón JA, Wittmann T, Jura N, Floor SN. G3BP isoforms differentially affect stress granule assembly and gene expression during cellular stress. Mol Biol Cell 2024; 35:ar140. [PMID: 39356796 PMCID: PMC11617104 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e24-02-0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Stress granules (SGs) are macromolecular assemblies that form under cellular stress. Formation of these membraneless organelles is driven by the condensation of RNA and RNA-binding proteins such as G3BPs. G3BPs form SGs following stress-induced translational arrest. Three G3BP paralogues (G3BP1, G3BP2A, and G3BP2B) have been identified in vertebrates. However, the contribution of different G3BP paralogues to SG formation and gene expression changes is incompletely understood. Here, we probed the functions of G3BPs by identifying important residues for SG assembly at their N-terminal domain such as V11. This conserved amino acid is required for formation of the G3BP-Caprin-1 complex, hence promoting SG assembly. Total RNA sequencing and ribosome profiling revealed that a G3BPV11A mutant leads to changes in mRNA levels and ribosome engagement during the integrated stress response (ISR). Moreover, we found that G3BP2B preferentially forms SGs and promotes changes in mRNA expression under endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Furthermore, our work is a resource for researchers to study gene expression changes under cellular stress. Together, this work suggests that perturbing protein-protein interactions mediated by G3BPs affect SG assembly and gene expression during the ISR, and such functions are differentially regulated by G3BP paralogues under ER stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Liboy-Lugo
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Carla A. Espinoza
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Jessica Sheu-Gruttadauria
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Jesslyn E. Park
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
| | - Albert Xu
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
| | - Ziad Jowhar
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
| | - Angela L. Gao
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - José A. Carmona-Negrón
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, PR 00680
| | - Torsten Wittmann
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
| | - Natalia Jura
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Stephen N. Floor
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yao Z, Liu Y, Chen Q, Chen X, Zhu Z, Song S, Ma X, Yang P. The divergent effects of G3BP orthologs on human stress granule assembly imply a centric role for the core protein interaction network. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114617. [PMID: 39120973 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) mediated by G3BP1/2 proteins and non-translating mRNAs mediates stress granule (SG) assembly. We investigated the phylogenetic evolution of G3BP orthologs from unicellular yeast to mammals and identified both conserved and divergent features. The modular domain organization of G3BP orthologs is generally conserved. However, invertebrate orthologs displayed reduced capacity for SG assembly in human cells compared to vertebrate orthologs. We demonstrated that the protein-interaction network facilitated by the NTF2L domain is a crucial determinant of this specificity. The evolution of the G3BP1 network coincided with its exploitation by certain viruses, as evident from the interaction between viral proteins and G3BP orthologs in insects and vertebrates. We revealed the importance and divergence of the G3BP interaction network in human SG formation. Leveraging this network, we established a 7-component in vitro SG reconstitution system for quantitative studies. These findings highlight the significance of G3BP network divergence in the evolution of biological processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiying Yao
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaoxin Chen
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhenshuo Zhu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sha Song
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xianjue Ma
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peiguo Yang
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia Y, Jia R, Dai Z, Zhou J, Ruan J, Chng W, Cai Z, Zhang X. Stress granules in cancer: Adaptive dynamics and therapeutic implications. iScience 2024; 27:110359. [PMID: 39100690 PMCID: PMC11295550 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Stress granules (SGs), membrane-less cellular organelles formed via liquid-liquid phase separation, are central to how cells adapt to various stress conditions, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, nutrient scarcity, and hypoxia. Recent studies have underscored a significant link between SGs and the process of tumorigenesis, highlighting that proteins, associated components, and signaling pathways that facilitate SG formation are often upregulated in cancer. SGs play a key role in enhancing tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, while also inhibiting apoptosis, facilitating immune evasion, and driving metabolic reprogramming through multiple mechanisms. Furthermore, SGs have been identified as crucial elements in the development of resistance against chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy across a variety of cancer types. This review delves into the complex role of SGs in cancer development and resistance, bringing together the latest progress in the field and exploring new avenues for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunlu Jia
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Ruyin Jia
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
| | - Zhengfeng Dai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jianbiao Zhou
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Republic of Singapore
| | - Jian Ruan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - WeeJoo Chng
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Republic of Singapore
| | - Zhen Cai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liboy-Lugo JM, Espinoza CA, Sheu-Gruttadauria J, Park JE, Xu A, Jowhar Z, Gao AL, Carmona-Negrón JA, Wittmann T, Jura N, Floor SN. Protein-protein interactions with G3BPs drive stress granule condensation and gene expression changes under cellular stress. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.06.579149. [PMID: 38370785 PMCID: PMC10871250 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.06.579149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Stress granules (SGs) are macromolecular assemblies that form under cellular stress. Formation of these condensates is driven by the condensation of RNA and RNA-binding proteins such as G3BPs. G3BPs condense into SGs following stress-induced translational arrest. Three G3BP paralogs (G3BP1, G3BP2A, and G3BP2B) have been identified in vertebrates. However, the contribution of different G3BP paralogs to stress granule formation and stress-induced gene expression changes is incompletely understood. Here, we identified key residues for G3BP condensation such as V11. This conserved amino acid is required for formation of the G3BP-Caprin-1 complex, hence promoting SG assembly. Total RNA sequencing and ribosome profiling revealed that disruption of G3BP condensation corresponds to changes in mRNA levels and ribosome engagement during the integrated stress response (ISR). Moreover, we found that G3BP2B preferentially condenses and promotes changes in mRNA expression under endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Together, this work suggests that stress granule assembly promotes changes in gene expression under cellular stress, which is differentially regulated by G3BP paralogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Liboy-Lugo
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carla A. Espinoza
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jessica Sheu-Gruttadauria
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jesslyn E. Park
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Albert Xu
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ziad Jowhar
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Angela L. Gao
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - José A. Carmona-Negrón
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, USA
| | - Torsten Wittmann
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Natalia Jura
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stephen N. Floor
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ripin N, Parker R. Formation, function, and pathology of RNP granules. Cell 2023; 186:4737-4756. [PMID: 37890457 PMCID: PMC10617657 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules are diverse membrane-less organelles that form through multivalent RNA-RNA, RNA-protein, and protein-protein interactions between RNPs. RNP granules are implicated in many aspects of RNA physiology, but in most cases their functions are poorly understood. RNP granules can be described through four key principles. First, RNP granules often arise because of the large size, high localized concentrations, and multivalent interactions of RNPs. Second, cells regulate RNP granule formation by multiple mechanisms including posttranslational modifications, protein chaperones, and RNA chaperones. Third, RNP granules impact cell physiology in multiple manners. Finally, dysregulation of RNP granules contributes to human diseases. Outstanding issues in the field remain, including determining the scale and molecular mechanisms of RNP granule function and how granule dysfunction contributes to human disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ripin
- Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
| | - Roy Parker
- Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.
| |
Collapse
|