1
|
Holmes NP, Di Chiaro NV, Crowe EM, Marson B, Göbel K, Gaigalas D, Jay T, Lockett AV, Powell ES, Zeni S, Reader AT. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over supramarginal gyrus stimulates primary motor cortex directly and impairs manual dexterity: implications for TMS focality. J Neurophysiol 2024; 131:360-378. [PMID: 38197162 PMCID: PMC11551002 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00369.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Based on human motor cortex, the effective spatial resolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as 5-20 mm, because small changes in TMS coil position can have large effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs are often studied at rest, with muscles relaxed. During muscle contraction and movement, corticospinal excitability is higher, thresholds for effective stimulation are lower, and MEPs can be evoked from larger regions of scalp, so the effective spatial resolution of TMS is larger. We found that TMS over the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) impaired manual dexterity in the grooved pegboard task. It also resulted in short-latency MEPs in hand muscles, despite the coil being 55 mm away from the motor cortex hand area (M1). MEPs might be evoked by either a specific corticospinal connection from SMG or a remote but direct electromagnetic stimulation of M1. To distinguish these alternatives, we mapped MEPs across the scalp during rest, isotonic contraction, and manual dexterity tasks and ran electric field simulations to model the expected M1 activation from 27 scalp locations and four coil orientations. We also systematically reviewed studies using TMS during movement. Across five experiments, TMS over SMG reliably evoked MEPs during hand movement. These MEPs were consistent with direct M1 stimulation and substantially decreased corticospinal thresholds during natural movement. Systematic review suggested that 54 published experiments may have suffered from similar motor activation confounds. Our results have implications for the assumed spatial resolution of TMS, and especially when TMS is presented within 55 mm of the motor cortex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as having an effective spatial resolution of ∼10 mm, because of the limited area of the scalp on which TMS produces motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in resting muscles. We find that during natural hand movement TMS evokes MEPs from a much larger scalp area, in particular when stimulating over the supramarginal gyrus 55 mm away. Our results show that TMS can be effective at much larger distances than generally assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Holmes
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emily M Crowe
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Marson
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Göbel
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dominykas Gaigalas
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Talia Jay
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abigail V Lockett
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor S Powell
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Zeni
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Arran T Reader
- Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ti CHE, Hu C, Yuan K, Chu WCW, Tong RKY. Uncovering the Neural Mechanisms of Inter-Hemispheric Balance Restoration in Chronic Stroke Through EMG-Driven Robot Hand Training: Insights From Dynamic Causal Modeling. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2024; 32:1-11. [PMID: 38051622 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3339756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
EMG-driven robot hand training can facilitate motor recovery in chronic stroke patients by restoring the interhemispheric balance between motor networks. However, the underlying mechanisms of reorganization between interhemispheric regions remain unclear. This study investigated the effective connectivity (EC) between the ventral premotor cortex (PMv), supplementary motor area (SMA), and primary motor cortex (M1) using Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) during motor tasks with the paretic hand. Nineteen chronic stroke subjects underwent 20 sessions of EMG-driven robot hand training, and their Action Reach Arm Test (ARAT) showed significant improvement ( β =3.56, [Formula: see text]). The improvement was correlated with the reduction of inhibitory coupling from the contralesional M1 to the ipsilesional M1 (r=0.58, p=0.014). An increase in the laterality index was only observed in homotopic M1, but not in the premotor area. Additionally, we identified an increase in resting-state functional connectivity (FC) between bilateral M1 ( β =0.11, p=0.01). Inter-M1 FC demonstrated marginal positive relationships with ARAT scores (r=0.402, p=0.110), but its changes did not correlate with ARAT improvements. These findings suggest that the improvement of hand functions brought about by EMG-driven robot hand training was driven explicitly by task-specific reorganization of motor networks. Particularly, the restoration of interhemispheric balance was induced by a reduction in interhemispheric inhibition from the contralesional M1 during motor tasks of the paretic hand. This finding sheds light on the mechanistic understanding of interhemispheric balance and functional recovery induced by EMG-driven robot training.
Collapse
|
3
|
Henderson J, Mari T, Hewitt D, Newton‐Fenner A, Giesbrecht T, Marshall A, Stancak A, Fallon N. The neural correlates of texture perception: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Brain Behav 2023; 13:e3264. [PMID: 37749852 PMCID: PMC10636420 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Humans use discriminative touch to perceive texture through dynamic interactions with surfaces, activating low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the skin. It was largely assumed that texture was processed in primary somatosensory regions in the brain; however, imaging studies indicate heterogeneous patterns of brain activity associated with texture processing. METHODS To address this, we conducted a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of 13 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (comprising 15 experiments contributing 228 participants and 275 foci) selected by a systematic review. RESULTS Concordant activations for texture perception occurred in the left primary somatosensory and motor regions, with bilateral activations in the secondary somatosensory, posterior insula, and premotor and supplementary motor cortices. We also evaluated differences between studies that compared touch processing to non-haptic control (e.g., rest or visual control) or those that used haptic control (e.g., shape or orientation perception) to specifically investigate texture encoding. Studies employing a haptic control revealed concordance for texture processing only in the left secondary somatosensory cortex. Contrast analyses demonstrated greater concordance of activations in the left primary somatosensory regions and inferior parietal cortex for studies with a non-haptic control, compared to experiments accounting for other haptic aspects. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that texture processing may recruit higher order integrative structures, and the secondary somatosensory cortex may play a key role in encoding textural properties. The present study provides unique insight into the neural correlates of texture-related processing by assessing the influence of non-textural haptic elements and identifies opportunities for a future research design to understand the neural processing of texture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyler Mari
- School of PsychologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | | - Alice Newton‐Fenner
- School of PsychologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- Institute of Risk and UncertaintyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | | - Alan Marshall
- Department of Electrical Engineering and ElectronicsUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Andrej Stancak
- School of PsychologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- Institute of Risk and UncertaintyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thompson EL, Bird G, Catmur C. Mirror neuron brain regions contribute to identifying actions, but not intentions. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:4901-4913. [PMID: 35906896 PMCID: PMC9582378 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have struggled to determine the relationship between mirror neuron brain regions and two distinct “action understanding” processes: identifying actions and identifying the intentions underlying those actions. This may be because the identification of intentions from others' actions requires an initial action identification process. Disruptive transcranial magnetic stimulation was administered to left inferior frontal gyrus (lIFG) during a novel cognitive task to determine which of these “action understanding” processes is subserved by mirror neuron brain regions. Participants identified either the actions performed by observed hand actions or the intentions underlying those actions. The extent to which intention identification was disrupted by lIFG (vs. control site) stimulation was dependent on the level of disruption to action identification. We subsequently performed functional magnetic resonance imaging during the same task. During action identification, responses were widespread within mirror neuron areas including lIFG and inferior parietal lobule. However, no independent responses were found in mirror neuron brain regions during intention identification. Instead, responses occurred in brain regions associated with two distinct mentalizing localizer tasks. This supports an account in which mirror neuron brain regions are involved in an initial action identification process, but the subsequent identification of intentions requires additional processing in mentalizing brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Thompson
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Geoffrey Bird
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Caroline Catmur
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dressing A, Kaller CP, Martin M, Nitschke K, Kuemmerer D, Beume LA, Schmidt CSM, Musso M, Urbach H, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Anatomical correlates of recovery in apraxia: A longitudinal lesion-mapping study in stroke patients. Cortex 2021; 142:104-121. [PMID: 34265734 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigates the clinical course of recovery of apraxia after left-hemisphere stroke and the underlying neuroanatomical correlates for persisting or recovering deficits in relation to the major processing streams in the network for motor cognition. METHODS 90 patients were examined during the acute (4.74 ± 2.73 days) and chronic (14.3 ± 15.39 months) stage after left-hemisphere stroke for deficits in meaningless imitation, as well as production and conceptual errors in tool use pantomime. Lesion correlates for persisting or recovering deficits were analyzed with an extension of the non-parametric Brunner-Munzel rank-order test for multi-factorial designs (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA) using acute images. RESULTS Meaningless imitation and tool use production deficits persisted into the chronic stage. Conceptual errors in tool use pantomime showed an almost complete recovery. Imitation errors persisted after occipitotemporal and superior temporal lesions in the dorso-dorsal stream. Chronic pantomime production errors were related to the supramarginal gyrus, the key structure of the ventro-dorsal stream. More anterior lesions in the ventro-dorsal stream (ventral premotor cortex) were additionally associated with poor recovery of production errors in pantomime. Conceptual errors in pantomime after temporal and supramarginal gyrus lesions persisted into the chronic stage. However, they resolved completely when related to angular gyrus or insular lesions. CONCLUSION The diverging courses of recovery in different apraxia tasks can be related to different mechanisms. Critical lesions to key structures of the network or entrance areas of the processing streams lead to persisting deficits in the corresponding tasks. Contrary, lesions located outside the core network but inducing a temporary network dysfunction allow good recovery e.g., of conceptual errors in pantomime. The identification of lesion correlates for different long-term recovery patterns in apraxia might also allow early clinical prediction of the course of recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Dressing
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Christoph P Kaller
- Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Dept. of Neuroradiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Markus Martin
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kai Nitschke
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dorothee Kuemmerer
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lena-A Beume
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte S M Schmidt
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mariacristina Musso
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Horst Urbach
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michel Rijntjes
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cornelius Weiller
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pastore-Wapp M, Nyffeler T, Nef T, Bohlhalter S, Vanbellingen T. Non-invasive brain stimulation in limb praxis and apraxia: A scoping review in healthy subjects and patients with stroke. Cortex 2021; 138:152-164. [PMID: 33691224 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are widely used in research settings to investigate brain mechanisms and increasingly being used for treatment purposes. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and review the current literature on NIBS studies of limb praxis and apraxia in healthy subjects and stroke patients with a scoping review using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed studies focusing on the investigation of limb praxis/apraxia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Fourteen out of 139 records met the inclusion criteria, including thirteen studies with healthy subjects and one with stroke patients. The results of our systematic review suggest that in healthy subjects NIBS over left inferior parietal lobe (IPL) mainly interfered with gesture processing, by either affecting reaction times in judgment tasks or real gesturing. First promising results suggest that inhibitory continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over right IPL may enhance gesturing in healthy subjects, explained by transcallosal facilitation of left IPL. In stroke patients, excitatory anodal tDCS over left IPL may improve limb apraxia. However, larger well powered and sham-controlled clinical trials are needed to expand on these proof-of-concept results, before NIBS could be a treatment option to improve limb apraxia in stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Pastore-Wapp
- Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Nyffeler
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University Bern, Switzerland; Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Research (DBMR) and Department of Neurology, University of Bern, and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Nef
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Bohlhalter
- Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tim Vanbellingen
- Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Umesawa Y, Atsumi T, Chakrabarty M, Fukatsu R, Ide M. GABA Concentration in the Left Ventral Premotor Cortex Associates With Sensory Hyper-Responsiveness in Autism Spectrum Disorders Without Intellectual Disability. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:482. [PMID: 32508576 PMCID: PMC7248307 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit abnormal processing of sensory inputs from multiple modalities and higher-order cognitive/behavioral response to those inputs. Several lines of evidence suggest that altered γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, is a central characteristic of the neurophysiology of ASD. The relationship between GABA in particular brain regions and atypical sensory processing in ASD is poorly understood. We therefore employed 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) to examine whether GABA levels in brain regions critical to higher-order motor and/or multiple sensory functions were associated with abnormal sensory responses in ASD. We evaluated atypical sensory processing with a clinically-validated assessment tool. Furthermore, we measured GABA levels in four regions: one each in the primary visual cortex, the left sensorimotor cortex, the left supplementary motor area (SMA), and the left ventral premotor cortex (vPMC). The latter two regions are thought to be involved in executing and coordinating cognitive and behavioral functions in response to multisensory inputs. We found severer sensory hyper-responsiveness in ASD relative to control participants. We also found reduced GABA concentrations in the left SMA but no differences in other regions of interest between ASD and control participants. A correlation analysis revealed a negative association between left vPMC GABA and the severity of sensory hyper-responsiveness across all participants, and the independent ASD group. These findings suggest that reduced inhibitory neurotransmission (reduced GABA) in a higher-order motor area, which modulates motor commands and integrates multiple sensory modalities, may underlie sensory hyper-responsiveness in ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Umesawa
- Department of Rehabilitation for Brain Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan.,Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Atsumi
- Department of Rehabilitation for Brain Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan.,Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mrinmoy Chakrabarty
- Department of Rehabilitation for Brain Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan.,Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-D), New Delhi, India
| | - Reiko Fukatsu
- Department of Rehabilitation for Brain Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masakazu Ide
- Department of Rehabilitation for Brain Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Left Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus Reduces Wrist Velocity During Emblematic Hand Gesture Imitation. Brain Topogr 2018; 32:332-341. [PMID: 30411178 PMCID: PMC6373290 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-018-0684-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Results from neuropsychological studies, and neuroimaging and behavioural experiments with healthy individuals, suggest that the imitation of meaningful and meaningless actions may be reliant on different processing routes. The left posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) is one area that might be important for the recognition and imitation of meaningful actions. We studied the role of the left pMTG in imitation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and two-person motion-tracking. Participants imitated meaningless and emblematic meaningful hand and finger gestures performed by a confederate actor whilst both individuals were motion-tracked. rTMS was applied during action observation (before imitation) over the left pMTG or a vertex control site. Since meaningless action imitation has been previously associated with a greater wrist velocity and longer correction period at the end of the movement, we hypothesised that stimulation over the left pMTG would increase wrist velocity and extend the correction period of meaningful actions (i.e., due to interference with action recognition). We also hypothesised that imitator accuracy (actor-imitator correspondence) would be reduced following stimulation over the left pMTG. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that stimulation over the pMTG, but not the vertex, during action observation reduced wrist velocity when participants later imitated meaningful, but not meaningless, hand gestures. These results provide causal evidence for a role of the left pMTG in the imitation of meaningful gestures, and may also be in keeping with proposals that left posterior temporal regions play a role in the production of postural components of gesture.
Collapse
|