Effects of a circadian mutation on seasonality in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus)

Neuroendocrine effects of the duper mutation in Syrian hamsters: a role for Cryptochrome 1

Molecular and physiological determinants of the timing of reproductive events, including the pre-ovulatory LH surge and seasonal fluctuations in fertility, are incompletely understood. We used the Cryptochrome 1-deficient duper mutant to examine the role of this core circadian clock gene in Syrian hamsters. We find that the phase of the LH surge and its stability upon shifts of the light: dark cycle are altered in duper mutants. The intensity of immunoreactive PER1 in GnRH cells of the preoptic area peaks earlier in the day in duper than wild type hamsters. We note that GnRH fibers coursing through the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contact vasopressin- and VIP-immunoreactive cells, suggesting a possible locus of circadian control of the LH surge. Unlike wild types, duper hamsters do not regress their gonads within 8 weeks of constant darkness, despite evidence of melatonin secretion during the subjective night. In light of the finding that the duper allele is a stop codon in Cryptochrome 1, our results suggest important neuroendocrine functions of this core circadian clock gene.

Photoperiodism in Neurospora Crassa

Plants and animals use day or night length for seasonal control of reproduction and other biological functions. Overwhelming evidence suggests that this photoperiodic mechanism relies on a functional circadian system. Recent progress has defined how flowering time in plants is regulated by photoperiodic control of output pathways, but the underlying mechanisms of photoperiodism remain to be described. The authors investigate photoperiodism in a genetic model system for circadian rhythms research, Neurospora crassa. They find that both propagation and reproduction respond systematically to photoperiod. Furthermore, a nonreproductive light-regulated function is also enhanced under certain photoperiodic conditions. All of these photoperiodic responses require a functional circadian clock, in that they are absent in a clock mutant. Night break experiments show that measuring night length is one of the mechanisms used for photoperiod assessment. This represents the first formal report of photoperiodism in the fungi.

Tau Differences between Short-Day Responsive and Short-Day Nonresponsive White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Do Not Affect Reproductive Photoresponsiveness

In laboratory-bred rodent populations, intraspecific variation in circadian system organization is a known cause of individual variation in reproductive photoresponsiveness. The authors sought to determine whether circadian system variation accounted for individual variation in reproductive photoresponsiveness in a single, highly genetically variable population of Peromyscus leucopusrecently derived from the wild. Running-wheel activity patterns of male and female mice, aged 70 to 90 days, from artificially selected lines of reproductively photoresponsive (R) and nonresponsive (NR) lines were monitored under short-day photoperiod (8 h light, 16 h dark), long-day photoperiod (16 h light, 8 h dark), and constant darkness (DD). NR mice displayed a significantly longer mean free-running period (24.08 h) in DD compared with R mice (23.75 h), due in large part to a difference between NR and R females (24.25 h vs. 23.74 h, respectively). All other entrainment characteristics (alpha, phase angle of activity) under short days, long days, and DD were similar between R and NR mice. Variation in free- running period and entrainment characteristics has been shown to affect photoresponsiveness in other rodent species by altering the manner in which the circadian system interprets short days. To determine whether variation in photoresponsiveness in P. leucopus is due to differences in free-running period instead of variation downstream from the central circadian clock in the pathway controlling photoresponsiveness, the authors exposed young R and NR mice to DD and measured the effect on reproductive organ development. If variation in free-running period affected how the circadian system of mice interpreted short days, then both R and NR mice exposed to DD should have exhibited a delay in gonadal development. Only R mice exhibited pubertal delay in DD. NR mice exhibited large paired testes, paired seminal vesicles, paired ovaries, and uterine weight typical of mice nonresponsive to short days, whereas R mice exhibited reproductive organ weight typical of mice responsive to short days. These data suggest that despite significant differences in free-running period between R and NR mice, individual variation in photoresponsiveness is not due to differences in how the circadian systems of R and NR mice interpret the LD cycle.

Clocks for all seasons: unwinding the roles and mechanisms of circadian and interval timers in the hypothalamus and pituitary

Adaptation to the environment is essential for survival, in all wild animal species seasonal variation in temperature and food availability needs to be anticipated. This has led to the evolution of deep-rooted physiological cycles, driven by internal clocks, which can track seasonal time with remarkable precision. Evidence has now accumulated that a seasonal change in thyroid hormone (TH) availability within the brain is a crucial element. This is mediated by local control of TH-metabolising enzymes within specialised ependymal cells lining the third ventricle of the hypothalamus. Within these cells, deiodinase type 2 enzyme is activated in response to summer day lengths, converting metabolically inactive thyroxine (T4) to tri-iodothyronine (T3). The availability of TH in the hypothalamus appears to be an important factor in driving the physiological changes that occur with season. Remarkably, in both birds and mammals, the pars tuberalis (PT) of the pituitary gland plays an essential role. A specialised endocrine thyrotroph cell (TSH-expressing) is regulated by the changing day-length signal, leading to activation of TSH by long days. This acts on adjacent TSH-receptors expressed in the hypothalamic ependymal cells, causing local regulation of deiodinase enzymes and conversion of TH to the metabolically active T3. In mammals, the PT is regulated by the nocturnal melatonin signal. Summer-like melatonin signals activate a PT-expressed clock-regulated transcription regulator (EYA3), which in turn drives the expression of the TSHβ sub-unit, leading to a sustained increase in TSH expression. In this manner, a local pituitary timer, driven by melatonin, initiates a cascade of molecular events, led by EYA3, which translates to seasonal changes of neuroendocrine activity in the hypothalamus. There are remarkable parallels between this PT circuit and the photoperiodic timing system used in plants, and while plants use different molecular signals (constans vs EYA3) it appears that widely divergent organisms probably obey a common set of design principles.

Relationship between circadian period and body size in the tau-mutant golden hamster

The tau mutation in the golden (Syrian) hamster is a single gene mutation that drastically affects the speed of the circadian clock, in such a way that homozygous mutants have an endogenous circadian period of 20 h (compared with 24 h for wild-type hamsters). While studying the circadian system of tau-mutant hamsters during the past 25 years, several authors have noted an apparent relationship between circadian period and body size in these animals. This study, based on 181 hamsters from 24 litters, confirmed previous observations that a shorter circadian period is associated with smaller body size, documented a sex difference in this association, and evaluated several mechanisms that might explain the phenomenon (such as different organ sizes, body composition, and metabolic rate). The obtained evidence suggests that the reduced body size of short-period hamsters is likely a pleiotropic effect of the tau allele (an allele of the casein kinase 1 epsilon gene) rather than a consequence of the shortened circadian period.

Duper: a mutation that shortens hamster circadian period

Three animals born to homozygous tau mutant (τ(ss), "super short") Syrian hamsters showed extremely short free-running periods of locomotor activity (τ(DD) of approximately 17.8 hours). Inbreeding produced 33 such "super duper" animals, which had a τ(DD) of 18.09 ± 0.05 hours, which was shorter than that of τ(ss) hamsters (20.66 ± 0.07 hours, p < 0.001). To test the hypothesis that a gene (Duper) is responsible for a 2-hour shortening of τ(DD), we backcrossed super duper hamsters to unrelated τ(ss) animals. The F(1) pups uniformly had a τ(DD) similar to that of τ(ss) hamsters (19.89 ± 0.15 hours), but F(2) animals showed a 1:1 ratio of the 18- to 20-hour phenotypes. In contrast, the F(1) of a cross between super duper hamsters and τ(ss) animals presumed heterozygous for duper showed a 1:1 ratio of 18- to 20-hour phenotypes, and inbreeding of the super duper F(1) offspring uniformly produced F(2) pups with extremely short τ(DD) (17.86 ± 0.5 hours). We isolated the duper mutation on a wild-type background through crossing of super duper with wild-type animals. Restriction digests identified short-period F(2) pups that lack the mutant CK1ε allele, and these animals had a mean τ(DD) of 23.11 ± 0.04 hours. τ(DD) of duper hamsters born and raised in DD was significantly shorter than in hamsters raised in 14L:10D (21.92 ± 0.12 hours, p < 0.0001). τ(DD) shortened twice as much in τ(s) and τ(ss) hamsters than in wild-type animals that were homozygous for duper, indicating the presence of epistatic interactions. Assortment of phenotypes in the F(2) generation fit the expected distribution for expression of duper as recessive (χ(2) = 6.41, p > 0.1). Neither CK1ε nor CK1δ coding region base sequences differed between super duper and τ(ss) hamsters. The growth rate of super duper mutants is similar to that of τ(ss) animals but slightly but significantly reduced at particular postweaning time points. We conclude that duper represents a new mutation that substantially reduces τ(DD) and has significant effects on physiology and metabolism.

Maternal photoperiodic history affects offspring development in Syrian hamsters

During the first 7 weeks of postnatal life, short day lengths inhibit the onset of puberty in many photoperiodic rodents, but not in Syrian hamsters. In this species, timing of puberty and fecundity are independent of the early postnatal photoperiod. Gestational day length affects postnatal reproductive development in several rodents; its role in Syrian hamsters has not been assessed. We tested the hypothesis that cumulative effects of pre- and postnatal short day lengths would restrain gonadal development in male Syrian hamsters. Males with prenatal short day exposure were generated by dams transferred to short day lengths 6 weeks, 3 weeks, and 0 weeks prior to mating. Additional groups were gestated in long day lengths and transferred to short days at birth, at 4 weeks of age, or not transferred (control hamsters). In pups of dams exposed to short day treatment throughout gestation, decreased testis growth was apparent by 3 weeks and persisted through 9 weeks of age, at which time maximum testis size was attained. A subset of males (14%), whose dams had been in short days for 3 to 6 weeks prior to mating displayed pronounced delays in testicular development, similar to those of other photoperiodic rodents. This treatment also increased the percentage of male offspring that underwent little or no gonadal regression postnatally (39%). By 19 weeks of age, males housed in short days completed spontaneous gonadal development. After prolonged long day treatment to break refractoriness, hamsters that initially were classified as nonregressors underwent testicular regression in response to a 2nd sequence of short day lengths. The combined action of prenatal and early postnatal short day lengths diminishes testicular growth of prepubertal Syrian hamsters no later than the 3rd week of postnatal life, albeit to a lesser extent than in other photoperiodic rodents.

New insights into ancient seasonal life timers

Organisms must adapt to seasonal changes in the environment and time their physiology accordingly. In vertebrates, the annual change in photoperiod is often critical for entraining the neuroendocrine pathways, which drive seasonal metabolic and reproductive cycles. These cycles depend on thyroid hormone (TH), reflecting its ancestral role in metabolic control. Recent studies reveal that--in mammals and birds--TH effects are mediated by the hypothalamus. Photoperiodic manipulations alter hypothalamic TH availability by regulating the expression of TH deiodinases (DIO). In non-mammalian vertebrates, light acts through extraretinal, 'deep brain' photoreceptors, and the eyes are not involved in seasonal photoperiodic responses. In mammals, extraretinal photoreceptors have been lost, and the nocturnal melatonin signal generated from the pineal gland has been co-opted to provide the photoperiodic message. Pineal function is phased to the light-dark cycle by retinal input, and photoperiodic changes in melatonin secretion control neuroendocrine pathway function. New evidence indicates that these comparatively divergent photosensensory mechanisms re-converge in the pars tuberalis of the pituitary, lying beneath the hypothalamus. In all vertebrates studied, the pars tuberalis secretes thyrotrophin in a light- or melatonin-sensitive manner, to act on neighbouring hypothalamic DIO expressing cells. Hence, an ancient and fundamentally conserved brain thyroid signalling system governs seasonal biology in vertebrates.

Variation in nocturnality and circadian activity rhythms between photoresponsive F344 and nonphotoresponsive Sprague Dawley rats

BACKGROUND

Variation in circadian rhythms and nocturnality may, hypothetically, be related to or independent of genetic variation in photoperiodic mediation of seasonal changes in physiology and behavior. We hypothesized that strain variation in photoperiodism between photoperiodic F344 rats and nonphotoperiodic Harlan Sprague Dawley (HSD) rats might be caused by underlying variation in clock function. We predicted that HSD rats would have more activity during the day or subjective day, longer free-running rhythms, poor entrainment to short day length, and shorter duration of activity, traits that have been associated with nonphotoperiodism in other laboratory rodent species, relative to F344 rats. An alternative hypothesis, that differences are due to variation in melatonin secretion or responses to melatonin, predicts either no such differences or inconsistent combinations of differences.

METHODS

We tested these predictions by examining activity rhythms of young male F344 and HSD rats given access to running wheels in constant dark (DD), short day length (L8:D16; SD), and long day length (L16:D8; LD). We compared nocturnality (the proportion of activity during night or subjective night), duration of activity (alpha), activity onset and offset, phase angle of entrainment, and free running rhythms (tau) of F344 and HSD rats.

RESULTS

HSD rats had significantly greater activity during the day, were sometimes arrhythmic in DD, and had significantly longer tau than F344 rats, consistent with predictions. However, HSD rats had significantly longer alpha than F344 rats and both strains entrained to SD, inconsistent with predictions.

CONCLUSION

The ability of HSD rats to entrain to SD, combined with longer alpha than F344 rats, suggests that the circadian system of HSD rats responds correctly to SD. These data offer best support for the alternative hypothesis, that differences in photoresponsiveness between F344 and HSD rats are caused by non-circadian differences in melatonin secretion or the response to melatonin.

Absence of circadian and photoperiodic conservation of energy expenditure in three rodent species

According to a traditional homeostatic view, living beings spend metabolic energy at a constant rate, just like a light bulb spends electrical energy, so that energy expenditure can be expressed in units of watts. However, research conducted during the last half-century has evinced pronounced circadian variation in physiological processes, not only demonstrating circadian rhythmicity in energy expenditure but also raising the hypothesis that energy expenditure may be regulated on a daily (circadian) basis rather than on a constant-rate (homeostatic) basis. In the present study, the hypothesis of circadian (and photoperiodic) conservation of energy expenditure was tested in three rodent species: domestic mice, Nile grass rats, and Syrian hamsters. Two correlates of energy expenditure (running-wheel activity and food intake) and a classic index (oxygen consumption) were used. Changes in energy expenditure were studied in animals maintained under light-dark cycles (LDs) with periods shorter or longer than 24 h as well as in animals maintained under 24-h LDs with short and long photophases. In none of the conditions in any of the species was evidence found in support of the hypothesis of circadian (or photoperiodic) conservation of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was generally conserved on a homeostatic basis.

Effects of prolonged acclimation to intermediate photoperiod and photo-schedule reversal in photosensitive golden hamsters

We investigated the effect of prolonged acclimation to 12 hr of light and photo-schedule reversal during the time of photosensitivity in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Before the experiments, animals were housed under natural photoperiod and then transferred to 12L:12D (light 12 hr:dark 12 hr) in autumn for 12 weeks. After 4 weeks of acclimation, photo-schedule was reversed (12D:12L). First experiments were done after 4 weeks of acclimation to an ambient temperature (T(a)) of 23 degrees C and a 12L:12D photo-schedule. We examined the daily variations in brown adipose tissue (BAT) capacity for nonshivering thermogenesis (NST). Noradrenaline (NA) injections were given every 4 hr while BAT temperature (T(BAT)) and preferred ambient temperature (PT(a)) were monitored continuously and simultaneously in a thermal gradient system. Then, we investigated the effect of light-dark cycle reversal on a daily rhythm of NST. The hamsters were acclimated to the photo-schedule reversed by 12 hr and the same T(a). After 4 and 8 weeks of acclimation to a reversed photo-schedule, the experiments were repeated. We found that the daily rhythm of the response to NA was entrained to the new light-dark cycle after 4 weeks of acclimation to a reversed photo-schedule. Maximum effect of NA was always recorded during the light phase and in the latter part of the dark phase of the day. NA-induced increase in T(BAT) was correlated with the decrease in PT(a), and was also inversely correlated with pre-injection T(BAT). These data imply that the daily rhythm of the capacity for NST opposes the daily rhythm of body temperature (T(b)). After 8 weeks of acclimation to the reversed photo-schedule, the rhythmicity of the response to NA disappeared, and the daily fluctuations in T(BAT) were the smallest. This lack of rhythm may be a physiological adaptation to winter conditions when the daily amplitude of T(b) rhythm is markedly reduced and, as a consequence, NST capacity does not vary within the day. Moreover, after 8 weeks of acclimation to reversed photo-schedule, NST capacity decreased while response to saline increased. During the experiments, hamsters were photosensitive and were changing to their winter status. However, because of the lack of cold during acclimation, the capacity for NST did not increase. Increased responsiveness to saline, indicating an increase in stress-induced thermogenesis, might be advantageous for "fight or flight" reaction.

Behavioral neuroendocrinology in nontraditional species of mammals: things the 'knockout' mouse CAN'T tell us

The exploration of many of the fundamental features of mammalian behavioral neuroendocrinology has benefited greatly throughout the short history of the discipline from the study of highly inbred, genetically characterized rodents and several other "traditional" exemplars. More recently, the impact of genomic variation in the determination of complex neuroendocrine and behavioral systems has advanced through the use of single and multiple gene knockouts or knockins. In our essay, we argue that the study of nontraditional mammals is an essential approach that complements these methodologies by taking advantage of allelic variation produced by natural selection. Current and future research will continue to exploit these systems to great advantage and will bring new techniques developed in more traditional laboratory animals to bear on problems that can only be addressed with nontraditional species. We highlight our points by discussing advances in our understanding of neuroendocrine and behavioral systems in phenomena of widely differing time scales. These examples include neuroendocrine variation in the regulation of reproduction across seasons in Peromyscus, variation in parental care by biparental male rodents and primates within a single infant rearing attempt, and circadian variation in the regulation of the substrates underlying mating in diurnal vs. nocturnal rodents. Our essay reveals both important divergences in neuroendocrine systems in our nontraditional model species, and important commonalities in these systems.

Photorefractoriness in mammals: dissociating a seasonal timer from the circadian-based photoperiod response

In seasonal animals, prolonged exposure to constant photoperiod induces photorefractoriness, causing spontaneous reversion in physiology to that of the previous photoperiodic state. This study tested the hypothesis that the onset of photorefractoriness is correlated with a change in circadian expression of clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (circadian pacemaker) and the pars tuberalis (PT, a melatonin target tissue). Soay sheep were exposed to summer photoperiod (16-h light) for either 6 or 30 wk to produce a photostimulated and photorefractory physiology, and seasonal changes were tracked by measuring the long-term prolactin cycles. Animals were killed at 4-h intervals throughout 24 h. Contrary to the hypothesis, the 24-h rhythmic expression of clock genes (Rev-erbalpha, Per1, Per2, Bmal1, Cry1) in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and PT reflected the ambient photoperiod/melatonin signal and not the changing physiology. Contrastingly, the PT expression of alpha-glycoprotein hormone subunit (alphaGSU) and betaTSH declined in photorefractory animals toward a short day-like endocrinology. We conclude that the generation of long-term endocrine cycles depends on the interaction between a circadian-based, melatonin-dependent timer that drives the initial photoperiodic response and a non-circadian-based timer that drives circannual rhythmicity in long-lived species. Under constant photoperiod the two timers can dissociate, leading to the apparent refractory state.

Top-down Approaches to the Study of Natural Variation in Complex Physiological Pathways Using the White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) as a Model

Variation in complex physiological pathways has important effects on human function and medical treatment. Complex pathways involve cells at multiple locations, which serve different functions regulated by many genes and include complex neuroendocrine pathways that regulate physiological function. One of two competing hypotheses regarding the effects of selection on complex pathways predicts that variability should be common within complex pathways. If this hypothesis is correct, then we should expect wide variation in neuroendocrine function to be typical within natural populations. To test this hypothesis, a complex neuroendocrine pathway that regulates photoperiod-dependent changes in fertility in a natural population of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) was used to test for natural genetic variability in multiple components of the pathway. After testing only six elements in the photoperiod pathway in P. leucopus, genetic variation in the following four of these elements was evident: the circadian clock, melatonin receptor abundance or affinity, sensitivity of the reproductive axis to steroid negative feedback, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal activity. If this result can be extended to humans, the prediction would be that significant variation at multiple loci in complex neuroendocrine pathways is common among humans, and that variation would exist even in human populations from a common genetic background. This finding could only be drawn from an "exotic" animal model derived from a natural source population, confirming the continuing importance of nontraditional models alongside the standard laboratory species.

Seasonal aspects of sleep in the Djungarian hamster

BACKGROUND

Changes in photoperiod and ambient temperature trigger seasonal adaptations in the physiology and behaviour of many species, including the Djungarian hamster. Exposure of the hamsters to a short photoperiod and low ambient temperature leads to a reduction of the polyphasic distribution of sleep and waking over the light and dark period. In contrast, a long photoperiod enhances the daily sleep-wake amplitude leading to a decline of slow-wave activity in NREM sleep within the light period. It is unknown whether these changes can be attributed specifically to photoperiod and/or ambient temperature, or whether endogenous components are contributing factors. The influence of endogenous factors was investigated by recording sleep in Djungarian hamsters invariably maintained at a low ambient temperature and fully adapted to a short photoperiod. The second recording was performed when they had returned to summer physiology, despite the maintenance of the 'winter' conditions.

RESULTS

Clear winter-summer differences were seen in sleep distribution, while total sleep time was unchanged. A significantly higher light-dark cycle modulation in NREM sleep, REM sleep and waking was observed in hamsters in the summer physiological state compared to those in the winter state. Moreover, only in summer, REM sleep episodes were longer and waking bouts were shorter during the light period compared to the dark period. EEG power in the slow-wave range (0.75-4.0 Hz) in both NREM sleep and REM sleep was higher in animals in the summer physiological state than in those in the 'winter' state. In winter SWA in NREM sleep was evenly distributed over the 24 h, while in summer it decreased during the light period and increased during the dark period.

CONCLUSION

Endogenous changes in the organism underlie the differences in sleep-wake redistribution we have observed previously in hamsters recorded in a short and long photoperiod.

Reduced body mass, food intake, and testis size in response to short photoperiod in adult F344 rats

BACKGROUND

Although laboratory rats are often considered classic nonseasonal breeders, peripubertal rats of two inbred strains, F344 and BN, have both reproductive and nonreproductive responses to short photoperiods. Unmanipulated adult rats have not been reported to have robust responses to short photoperiod alone, although several treatments can induce photoperiodic responses in adults. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that unmanipulated F344 rats retain responses to short photoperiod as adults and that they have the necessary elements for an endogenous circannual rhythm of sensitivity to short photoperiod.

RESULTS

Relative to rats kept in long photoperiods (L16:D8), adult F344 rats transferred at 4.5 months of age to short photoperiods (L8:D16) had significantly lower testis size, food intake, and body weight. In a second experiment, newly weaned F344 rats underwent an initial period of inhibition of reproductive maturation, lower food intake, and lower body weight in short photoperiod or intermediate photoperiod (L12:D12) relative to rats in long photoperiod. By 18 weeks of treatment, rats in the two inhibitory photoperiods no longer differed from long photoperiod controls. In short photoperiod, rats underwent a second period of slight reproductive inhibition between weeks 35 and 48, but there was an effect on body weight and slight inhibition of food intake only in an intermediate photoperiod.

CONCLUSION

Male F344 rats retain photoresponsiveness as adults, with less reproductive inhibition but equivalent nonreproductive responses. There was only weak evidence for an endogenous timer controlling a circannual cycle of sensitivity to short photoperiod.

Encoding le quattro stagioni within the mammalian brain: photoperiodic orchestration through the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is a pacemaker that not only drives circadian rhythmicity but also directs the circadian organization of photoperiodic (seasonal) timekeeping. Recent evidence using electrophysiological, molecular, and genetic tools now strongly supports this conclusion. Important questions remain regarding the SCN's precise role(s) in the brain's photoperiodic circuits, especially among different species, and the cellular and molecular mechanisms for its photoperiodic "memory." New data suggesting that SCN "clock" genes may also function as "calendar" genes are a first step toward understanding how a photoperiodic clock is built from cycling molecules.