Self-harm to preferentially harm the pathogens within: non-specific stressors in innate immunity

Let fever do its job: The meaning of fever in the pandemic era

Although fever is one of the main presenting symptoms of COVID-19 infection, little public attention has been given to fever as an evolved defense. Fever, the regulated increase in the body temperature, is part of the evolved systemic reaction to infection known as the acute phase response. The heat of fever augments the performance of immune cells, induces stress on pathogens and infected cells directly, and combines with other stressors to provide a nonspecific immune defense. Observational trials in humans suggest a survival benefit from fever, and randomized trials published before COVID-19 do not support fever reduction in patients with infection. Like public health measures that seem burdensome and excessive, fevers involve costly trade-offs but they can prevent infection from getting out of control. For infections with novel SARS-CoV-2, the precautionary principle applies: unless evidence suggests otherwise, we advise that fever should be allowed to run its course. Lay summary: For COVID-19, many public health organizations have advised treating fever with medicines such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Even though this is a common practice, lowering body temperature has not improved survival in laboratory animals or in patients with infections. Blocking fever can be harmful because fever, along with other sickness symptoms, evolved as a defense against infection. Fever works by causing more damage to pathogens and infected cells than it does to healthy cells in the body. During pandemic COVID-19, the benefits of allowing fever to occur probably outweigh its harms, for individuals and for the public at large.

The (p)ppGpp Synthetase RSH Mediates Stationary-Phase Onset and Antibiotic Stress Survival in Clostridioides difficile

The human pathogen Clostridioides difficile is increasingly tolerant of multiple antibiotics and causes infections with a high rate of recurrence, creating an urgent need for new preventative and therapeutic strategies. The stringent response, a universal bacterial response to extracellular stress, governs antibiotic survival and pathogenesis in diverse organisms but has not previously been characterized in C. difficile Here, we report that the C. difficile (p)ppGpp synthetase RSH is incapable of utilizing GTP or GMP as a substrate but readily synthesizes ppGpp from GDP. The enzyme also utilizes many structurally diverse metal cofactors for reaction catalysis and remains functionally stable at a wide range of environmental pHs. Transcription of rsh is stimulated by stationary-phase onset and by exposure to the antibiotics clindamycin and metronidazole. Chemical inhibition of RSH by the ppGpp analog relacin increases antibiotic susceptibility in epidemic C. difficile R20291, indicating that RSH inhibitors may be a viable strategy for drug development against C. difficile infection. Finally, transcriptional suppression of rsh also increases bacterial antibiotic susceptibility, suggesting that RSH contributes to C. difficile antibiotic tolerance and survival.IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an urgent public health threat with a high recurrence rate, in part because the causative bacterium has a high rate of antibiotic survival. The (p)ppGpp-mediated bacterial stringent response plays a role in antibiotic tolerance in diverse pathogens and is a potential target for development of new antimicrobials because the enzymes that metabolize (p)ppGpp have no mammalian homologs. We report that stationary-phase onset and antibiotics induce expression of the clostridial ppGpp synthetase RSH and that both chemical inhibition and translational suppression of RSH increase C. difficile antibiotic susceptibility. This demonstrates that development of RSH inhibitors to serve as adjuvants to antibiotic therapy is a potential approach for the development of new strategies to combat CDI.

New Insights into the Role of Glutathione in the Mechanism of Fever

Glutathione is one of the most important and potent antioxidants. The development of pharmacological compounds that can either increase or decrease glutathione concentrations has allowed investigation into the role of glutathione in various biological processes, including immune responses. Recent findings have shown that glutathione not only affects certain factors involved in immunological processes but also modifies complex immune reactions such as fever. Until recently, it was not known why some patients do not develop fever during infection. Data suggest that fever induction is associated with oxidative stress; therefore, antioxidants such as glutathione can reduce pyrexia. Surprisingly, new studies have shown that low glutathione levels can also inhibit fever. In this review, we focus on recent advances in this area, with an emphasis on the role of glutathione in immune responses accompanied by fever. We describe evidence showing that disturbed glutathione homeostasis may be responsible for the lack of fever during infections. We also discuss the biological significance of the antipyretic effects produced by pharmacological glutathione modulators.