Comparison of susceptibility patterns using commercially available susceptibility testing methods performed on prevalent Candida spp

Impact of Obesity on Echinocandin Effectiveness in Treating Candida Infections: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Introduction

Echinocandins are used to treat invasive candidiasis (IC), with FDA-approved doses indicated for both obese and non-obese patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies have identified subtherapeutic exposure in obese patients receiving standard doses (SDs) of echinocandins. However, research on clinical outcome differences of echinocandins' SDs between obese and non-obese patients is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of echinocandins' SDs in obese compared to normal-weight patients with IC.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) from Jan 2017 to Feb 2023. The study included adult patients diagnosed with Candida infections who received ≥ 4 doses of echinocandins. Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m2 were excluded from the study. The primary and secondary outcomes included the total length of stay (LOS), IC duration, frequency of clinical resolution and all-cause mortality.

Results

This study included 132 patients (47 obese; 85 non-obese) with a median age of 61 years. The median BMI and weight were different between the obese (34.5 kg/m2, 88 kg) and non-obese (24 kg/m2, 65 kg) groups (P= 0.01). Micafungin and caspofungin were used in 63.6% and 36.4% of patients, respectively. The total LOS and length of IC infections were similar between both groups, with median values of 29.5 days (P= 0.896) and 18 days (P = 0.160), respectively. The clinical improvement percentages were 68.1% for obese and 65.9% for non-obese patients (P= 0.797), with all-cause mortality rates at 44.7% and 42.4%, respectively (P= 0.796).

Conclusion

The study found no clinical outcome differences between obese and non-obese patients, with Similar effectiveness of the echinocandins' SDs in both groups. Further research in multi-centre settings is recommended to detect any potential differences between the two groups.

Comparative study of antifungal susceptibility testing methods for clinical Candida albicans isolates

PURPOSE

Candida albicans is the second most common cause of candidemia in Malaysia. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method is the gold standard for determining its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); however, it is laborious and time-consuming. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of alternative methods, namely Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), VITEK 2 system, and E-test for determining the MIC of clinical C. albicans isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The susceptibilities of 95 C. albicans isolates were compared between SYO, VITEK 2 system, and E-test with CLSI broth microdilution method. The categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (MiE) were calculated.

RESULTS

Our finding showed the CA varied for SYO from 96.8% to 100%, while the EA ranged from 91.6% to 100%. The SYO method showed 1.1% of VME and ME, and up to 3.2% of MiE. Next, the CA and EA ranges for the VITEK 2 system were 97.8%-100% and 23.2%-100%, respectively. In the VITEK 2 technique, 1.1% of VME were found. For the E-test, the CA varied from 83.2% to 100% while the EA ranged from 64.2% to 98.9%. The E-test method showed 1.1% of VME and up to 16.8% of MiE.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, SYO and VITEK 2 (except flucytosine) could be potential alternatives to the CLSI broth microdilution method in determining the MIC of C. albicans.

Epidemiology of nosocomial candidemia, mortality and antifungal resistance, 7-year experience, in Turkey

Candidemia is an important clinical condition that prolongs the period of hospitalization and increases morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and microbiological characteristics of patients with candidemia, between January 2013 and December 2019. Two hundred forty-one candidemia episodes were observed in the 230 patients, of whom 45% were female. The median age was 63 and 53.9% of the episodes were in the ICU. Frequently observed predisposing factors for candidemia included the use of antibiotics (71.3%), urinary catheterization (56.3%), Central venous catheter placement (50.3%), total parenteral nutrition (47.9%), solid-organ malignancy (46%), a surgical intervention (48.6%), chemotherapy (37%), steroid treatment (25.5%). The crude mortality rate was 52.7%. A significant difference was found between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.007) with the Charlson comorbidity index. However, no statistically significant association was found between mortality and age, sex, surgical intervention, catheter-related candidemia, or Candida spp. The most frequently isolated Candida spp. was C. albicans (51%). Overall resistance to fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin and flucytosine was 3.7%, 0%, 2.5%, 1.8%,1.8%, respectively. Consequently, there is a need for tests that yield higher success rates and rapid in diagnosis candidemia and local epidemiological data for antifungal resistance.

Comparison of Six Antifungal Susceptibilities of 11 Candida Species Using the VITEK2 AST-YS08 Card and Broth Microdilution Method

We used a Vitek 2 AST-YS08 (YS08) system and the broth microdilution method (BMD) adopted by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to compare the susceptibility of 184 isolates of 11 Candida species to fluconazole, voriconazole, micafungin, caspofungin, amphotericin B, and flucytosine. In Candida albicans, the categorical agreement (CA) was 79.2%, 91.7%, 95.8%, and 95.8% for fluconazole, voriconazole, micafungin, and caspofungin, respectively. About 12.5% and 4.2% of very major errors were detected for fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively. C. glabrata showed excellent essential agreements (EAs) (>90%) for azoles but different MIC distributions for fluconazole and caspofungin. The CA between BMD fluconazole MICs and YS08 voriconazole MICs by the method-specific clinical breakpoint (CBP) was 90% in C. glabrata. Over 80% of C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates identified as micafungin-susceptible were labeled intermediate or resistant to caspofungin in YS08. In C. parapsilosis, 5.3% of very major errors and 10.5% of minor errors were found, whereas 33.3% of minor errors were observed in C. tropicalis for fluconazole. For C. tropicalis, 13 (61.9%) non-wild type (WT) isolates of fluconazole and 7 (33.3%) non-WTs of voriconazole were classified in YS08 as WT. For C. auris, the EAs were 93.3%, 100%, 82.2%, 97.8%, and 97.8% for fluconazole, voriconazole, micafungin, caspofungin, and amphotericin B, respectively. YS08 showed comparable results to the BMD. However, considering the lower YS08 fluconazole MIC results compared with BMD in Candida species and YS08 caspofungin results in C. glabrata and C. krusei, improvements are needed. IMPORTANCE The new Vitek 2 AST-YS08 (YS08) card has been updated to reflect the recently revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline. In this study, antifungal drug susceptibility tests were performed using the YS08 card and compared with the CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) method. In conclusion, YS08 showed similar results to BMD, including with C. auris. However, about 12.5% and 4.2% of major errors were detected for fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively, in C. albicans. More than 80% of C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates identified as susceptible to micafungin were labeled moderate or resistant to caspofungin in YS08. The categorical agreement between BMD fluconazole MICs and YS08 voriconazole MICs was 90% by the method-specific CBP of voriconazole, 80% by the current epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) (0.25 μg/mL) of voriconazole, and 85% by the previous ECV (0.5 μg/mL) of voriconazole. Further improvements in YS08 for the detection of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance are thus needed.

Risk factors for isolation of fluconazole and echinocandin non-susceptible Candida species in critically ill patients

Introduction. Resistance rates to azoles and echinocandins of Candida spp. increased over the last decade.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Widespread use of antifungals could lead to development and dissemination of resistant Candida spp.Aim. To identify risk factors for isolation of Candida spp. non-susceptible to either fluconazole or echinocandins.Methodology. All patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the University General Hospital of Patras, Greece with Candida spp. isolated from clinical specimens during a ten-year period (2010-19) were included. Candida isolates were identified using Vitek-2 YST card. Consumption of antifungals was calculated.Results. During the study period, 253 isolates were included. C. non-albicans predominated (64.4 %) with C. parapsilosis being the most commonly isolated (42.3 %) followed by C. glabrata (nomenclatural change to Nakaseomyces glabrataa; 8.7 %) and C. tropicalis (11.9 %). Among all isolates, 45.8 and 28.5 % were non-susceptible and resistant to fluconazole, respectively. Concerning echinocandins, 8.7 % of isolates were non-susceptible to at least one echinocandin (anidulafungin or micafungin) and 3.1 % resistant. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospitalization during 2015-19, as compared to 2010-14, isolate being non-albicans or non-susceptible to at least one echinocandin was associated with isolation of fluconazole non-susceptible isolate. Administration of echinocandin, isolate being C. glabrata or C. tropicalis, or Candida spp. non-susceptible to fluconazole were independently associated with isolation of Candida spp. non-susceptible to at least one echinocandin. Fluconazole's administration decreased during the study period, whereas liposomal-amphotericin B's and echinoncandins' administration remained stable.Conclusion. Fluconazole's non-susceptibility increased during the study period, despite the decrease of its administration. Although echinocandins' administration remained stable, non-susceptibility among Candida spp. increased.

Detection of Cross-Resistance Between Methotrexate and Azoles in Candida albicans and Meyerozyma guilliermondii: An In Vitro Study

In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in the incidence of Candida infections. The different species of the genus Candida vary in their virulence abilities and susceptibility to antifungal agents, depending on several external factors. The result of such modifications may be cross-resistance, which is understood as an acquired resistance to a certain antimicrobial agent after exposure to another drug. The aim of this study was to determine the possibility of cross-resistance between fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and methotrexate in Candida albicans and Meyerozyma guilliermondii (syn. Candida guilliermondii ). Fifteen strains of M. guilliermondii and eight strains of C. albicans , including the standard strains, were tested. For all strains, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole were determined before and after stimulation with methotrexate. The median MICs in M. guilliermondii before and after stimulation were 9.333 and 64 mg/L ( p = 0.005) for fluconazole; 0.917 and 1.667 mg/L ( p = 0.001) for itraconazole, respectively. No significant change in MIC was observed for voriconazole. For C. albicans strains, the median MICs before and after stimulation were 0.917 and 64 mg/L ( p = 0.012) for fluconazole; 0.344 and 1.135 mg/L ( p = 0.018) for voriconazole, respectively. There was no significant change in MIC values for itraconazole. Thus, this study demonstrates the presence of cross-resistance between voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, and methotrexate for the selected strains. Methotrexate exposure induces different responses when certain drugs are used for various species. Therefore, if a patient was previously exposed to methotrexate, there may be a higher risk of treatment failure with fluconazole than with other azoles such as voriconazole for fungemia caused by M. guilliermondii or itraconazole for C. albicans infection.

Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Propyl-Propane-Thiosulfinate and Propyl-Propane-Thiosulfonate, Two Organosulfur Compounds from Allium cepa: In Vitro Antimicrobial Effect via the Gas Phase

Propyl-propane thiosulfinate (PTS) and propyl-propane thiosulfonate (PTSO) are two volatile compounds derived from Allium cepa with a widely documented antimicrobial activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate their anti-candidiasis activity and the ability of its gaseous phase to inhibit bacterial and yeast growth in vitro. The minimum inhibitory concentration of various antifungal products (including PTS and PTSO) was determined versus 203 clinical isolates of Candida spp. through broth microdilution assay. Additionally, the antimicrobial activity through aerial diffusion of PTS and PTSO was evaluated over the growth of a collection of bacteria and yeasts cultivated in agar plates. All yeasts were susceptible to the antifungals tested, except C. glabrata and C. krusei, that showed azole resistance. PTSO (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ ranged from 4 to 16 mg/L and 8 to 32 mg/L, respectively) was significantly more active against yeasts than PTS (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ ranged from 16 to 64 mg/L and 32 to 64 mg/L). Values were higher than those obtained for antifungal drugs. Gaseous phases of PTS and PTSO generated growth inhibition zones whose diameters were directly related to the substances concentration and inversely related to the microbial inoculum. The quantification of PTS and PTSO levels reached in the growth media through aerial diffusion displayed a concentration gradient from the central zone to the periphery. Only P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 showed resistance, while yeasts (C. albicans ATCC 200955 and C. krusei ATCC 6258) presented the higher susceptibility to both compounds. These results suggest that PTS and PTSO display antibacterial and anti-candidiasis activity in vitro through aerial diffusion, having potential use in human therapy.

Updating of in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests

Fungal diseases, including those caused by (multi)drug-resistant fungi, still represent a global public health concern. Information on the susceptibility of these microorganisms to antifungal agents must be quickly produced to help clinicians initiate appropriate antifungal therapies. Unfortunately, antifungal susceptibility tests are not as developed or widely implemented as antibacterial tests, being similar in design, accuracy and reproducibility, but also laborious and slow. In this article, we review the methods of in vitro susceptibility testing, both reference (CLSI and EUCAST), commercial and new methods based on proteomics (MALDI-TOF MS) and in the detection of resistance genes by nucleic acid amplification techniques. In addi-tion, we discuss the newly established clinical breakpoints, as well as the epidemiological cut-off points, which constitute a new category that can help in the early identification of isolates that have acquired resistance mechanisms. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of each of the methods studied. Therefore, we can conclude that, although there has been much progress in studies of in vitro susceptibility testing to antifungals, there are still limitations in its application in the daily routine of microbiology labo-ratories, although it seems that the future is promising with the new technologies based on proteomics and nucleic acid amplification. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled «SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016», which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosasy Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.

Impact of Obesity in Patients with Candida Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Candida species are responsible for 15% of bloodstream infections, leading to prolonged hospitalizations and increased mortality. With the rise in obesity, antifungal dosing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in clinical outcomes between obese versus non-obese patients with Candida bloodstream infections.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included adult patient's first episode of Candida bloodstream infection treated with ≥ 48 h of antifungal therapy between 1 June 2013 and 31 August 2019. Patients were excluded for: dual systemic antifungal therapy, polymicrobial infections, or chronic candidiasis. The primary outcome was infection-related length of stay. Secondary outcomes included: time to candidemia resolution, 30-day readmission rates, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included (28 obese; 52 non-obese). Most were male (55%); median age was 54 years. Median BMI and weight were 36.3 kg/m2 and 103 kg versus 20.4 kg/m2 and 61 kg, respectively (p < 0.01). Baseline characteristics were comparable. C. albicans was isolated in 37.5% of cultures and C. glabrata in 30%. Micafungin was utilized empirically in 72.5% of patients; obese patients received definitive micafungin more frequently (57.1% vs. 21.2%; p < 0.01) and were treated longer (13 versus 10 days; p = 0.04). Infection-related length of stay was 19 days in the obese patients and 13 days in the non-obese patients (p = 0.05). Non-obese patients had a shorter duration of candidemia (5 versus 6 days; p = 0.02). In-hospital mortality was numerically higher in obese patients (21.4% versus 13.5%; p = 0.36). There were no differences in 30-day readmissions between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse clinical outcomes were observed for obese versus non-obese patients. Further clinical research is warranted.

Proof of Concept for MBT ASTRA, a Rapid Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-Based Method To Detect Caspofungin Resistance in Candida albicans and Candida glabrata

The incidence of candidemia caused by Candida albicans and Candida glabrata is constantly increasing and is accompanied by the rising use of the few available antifungals. The widespread use of echinocandins and azoles for the treatment of invasive candidemia has enhanced the development of antifungal resistance, resulting in an increasing health care problem. Hence, the rapid detection of resistant strains is required. This study aimed to evaluate the detection of C. albicans and C. glabrata strains resistant to caspofungin by the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization Biotyper antibiotic susceptibility test rapid assay (MBT ASTRA). This novel semiquantitative technique facilitates the detection of caspofungin-resistant strains within 6 h. MBT ASTRA results were compared to the data obtained by the use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Clinical isolates of C. albicans (n = 58) and C. glabrata (n = 57) were analyzed by MBT ASTRA and the CLSI microdilution method. Antifungal susceptibility testing against caspofungin by the CLSI microdilution method classified the C. albicans isolates into 36 susceptible and 22 resistant strains and the C. glabrata isolates into 5 susceptible, 33 resistant, and 19 intermediate strains. For C. albicans, the comparison of MBT ASTRA and the CLSI method revealed an excellent categorical agreement of 100%. A sensitivity and a specificity between MBT ASTRA and the CLSI microdilution method of 94% and 80%, respectively, were detected for C. glabrata strains, based on categorical agreement. In conclusion, the results obtained by MBT ASTRA indicate that this is a very promising approach for the rapid detection of Candida isolates resistant to caspofungin.

Responding to the emergence of antifungal drug resistance: perspectives from the bench and the bedside

The incidence of serious fungal infections is increasing rapidly, and yet the rate of new drugs becoming available to treat them is slow. The limited therapeutic armamentarium is a challenge for clinicians, because the available drugs are often toxic, expensive, difficult to administer, ineffective or a combination of all four. Given this setting, the emergence of resistance is especially concerning, and a review of the topic is timely. Here we discuss antifungal drug resistance in Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. with reference to the most commonly used first-line antifungal agents - azoles and echinocandins. We review the resistance mechanisms of the leading pathogens, how resistance can be identified in the diagnostic lab and the clinical implications of resistance once detected.