Assessment of version 2.5 of QMAC-dRAST for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with reduced sample-to-answer turnaround time and an integrated expert system

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the new rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) QMAC-dRAST V2.5 system.

METHODS

ASTs were performed using QMAC-dRAST-V2.5 and a disk diffusion method, directly from positive blood bottles with Gram-negative bacteria. Discrepancies between the results obtained using the two methods were categorized into very major errors (VME, S with dRAST vs. R with disk diffusion), major errors (ME, R vs. S, respectively), minor errors (mE, S vs. I or I vs. R, respectively), and very minor errors (Vme, I vs. S or R vs. I, respectively). For each AST, results were recorded after 4, 5, and 6h of incubation.

RESULTS

From 106 bacteremia, 1416 individual AST results were obtained. Overall agreement between results using the two methods was 91%, ranging from 76.9% to 99.1% depending upon the antibiotic, with 128 errors, i.e. 14/1416 (1%) VME, 59/1416 (4.2%) ME, 25/1416 (1.8%) mE and 30/1416 (2.1%) Vme. VMEs were encountered for Klebsiellasp and Serratia marcescens isolates with low-level piperacillin and amikacin resistance, respectively. Using the integrated QMAC-dRAST-V2.5 expert system, all 14 VMEs and 3 mEs were eliminated, leading to 92.2% categorical agreement. After 45min of pre-incubation in the QMAC-dRAST-V2.5 device, 22.2% of the 1416 AST results were obtained after 4h, an additional 31.4% after 5h and a further 46.3% after 6h.

CONCLUSION

QMAC-dRAST-V2.5 is an optimized version of QMAC-dRAST V2.0, particularly with respect to utilization of an expert system and reduced TAT according to the antibiotic tested.

Evaluation of Two Methods for the Detection of Third Generation Cephalosporins Resistant Enterobacterales Directly From Positive Blood Cultures

Due to the importance of a rapid determination of patients infected by multidrug resistant bacteria, we evaluated two rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC)-resistant Enterobacterales directly from positive blood cultures within 1 h: BL-RED^TM (electrochemical method) and β-LACTA^TM test (chromogenic method). A panel of 150 clinical strains characterized for their resistance profiles (e.g., penicillinases, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), overproduction of cephalosporinase, carbapenemases, impermeability) was tested. Approximately 100 CFU of each isolate was spiked into sterile blood culture bottles and incubated in a BD BACTEC^TM FX automated system (Becton Dickinson, USA). Positive blood cultures were examined to parallel testing using the BL-RED^TM and β-LACTA^TM tests and conventional susceptibility method (disc diffusion following EUCAST recommendations). For all phenotypes combined, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the detection of 3GC resistance were, respectively (i) with BL-RED^TM: 45.7, 100, 100, and 54.2% and (ii) with β-LACTA^TM test: 52.2, 100, 100, and 56.9%. The positivity of tests allows to adapt antibiotic treatment whereas the negative result requires other tests. Moreover, these tests detect most Ambler class A-producing Enterobacterales (KPC, ESBL, extended-spectrum OXY) with sensitivities and specificities of 87.5 and 99% for BL-RED^TM, respectively and both 100% for β-LACTA^TM test (47/47 isolates). These two rapid tests failed to detect AmpC overexpressed (sensitivities of 2.7% for BL-RED^TM and 0% for β-LACTA^TM test) and Ambler class B-producing Enterobacterales (sensitivities of 40% for both tests) notably strains without ESBLs associated (sensitivities of 0% for both tests). BL-RED^TM and β-LACTA^TM tests are easy-to-use and mainly attractive when a positive result is obtained notably to detect most of the Ambler class A-producing Enterobacterales in <1 h after the positivity of the blood culture, allowing a rapid adaptation of the antibiotic therapy in patients.

Comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST V2.0 system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram-negative blood culture isolates

To comparatively evaluate the performance of the rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) system QMAC-dRAST V2.0 and of standard disk diffusion in agar, AST was performed directly from 100 positive blood culture bottles with Gram-negative bacilli. AST results provided by QMAC-dRAST showed 92.9% agreement with disk diffusion method results. Discrepancies observed between results obtained with QMAC-dRAST and disk diffusion method conducted to 10 very major errors (0.8%, S with QMAC-dRAST vs R with disk diffusion method), 40 major errors (3.2%, R vs S, respectively), 15 minor errors (1.2%, S vs I or I vs R, respectively) and 23 very minors errors (1.8%, I vs S or R vs I, respectively). For very major and major errors, in only 36% of the cases did the repeat QMAC-dRAST confirm the initial result, whereas a repeat AST using disk diffusion method confirmed the initial result in 92% of cases. AST results obtained using microdilution in liquid medium confirmed those obtained with QMAC-dRAST and disk diffusion method in 4% and 89%, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility tests performed on QMAC-dRAST using reference strains showed 94% to 100% of R/S/I categorical agreement.

Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory in Antimicrobial Stewardship

For adequate antimicrobial stewardship, microbiology needs to move from the laboratory to become physically and verbally amenable to the caregivers of an institution. Herein, we describe the contributions of our microbiology department to the antimicrobial stewardship program of a large teaching hospital as 10 main points ranging from the selection of patients deemed likely to benefit from a fast track approach, to their clinical samples, or the rapid reporting of results via a microbiology hotline, to rapid searches for pathogens and susceptibility testing. These points should serve as guidelines for similar programs designed to decrease the unnecessary use of antimicrobials.