Towards improved prognostic scores predicting survival in patients with brain metastases: a pilot study of serum lactate dehydrogenase levels

An analysis of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in advanced stage IV melanoma of the skin: prognostic capabilities and demographic variability

Despite its limitations, in part due to decreased specificity in advanced disease, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is one of few serum factors used in cancer staging. This study quantifies the predictive capabilities of LDH in stage IV melanoma of the skin and explores the validity of suggested demographic discrepancies which may exist in its use. The 1975-2017 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for stage IV cutaneous melanoma cases. Demographic characteristics were compared between LDH groups using chi-square and t tests. Subsequent Cox multivariable regression was performed to assess survival differences. 334 cases of stage IV cutaneous melanoma (average age: 63.0 years) with measured serum LDH levels were identified. Of these patients, 150 (44.9%) had normal LDH, 112 (33.5%) had LDH < 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), 57 (17.1%) had LDH 1.5-10 × ULN, and 15 (4.5%) had LDH > 10 × ULN. Lower incomes were associated with higher LDH; individuals with incomes < $50,000 had the greatest proportion of LDH 10 × ULN (19.2%; p = 0.0031). LDH > 10 × ULN also had the lowest proportion of White patients (p = 0.04). On Cox multivariable survival analysis, increasing LDH levels showed increased risk of death (LDH < 1.5 × ULN: HR = 2.05, p = 0.01; LDH 1.5-10 × ULN: HR = 1.46, p < 0.001; LDH > 10 × ULN: HR = 5.91, p < 0.001). This study reaffirms the utility of LDH as a significant predictor of mortality with incremental severity, suggesting possible use for mortality projections. We note that Black patients and those with lower incomes may be more likely to have an elevated LDH. Older age groups and presence of ulceration among patients with stage IV melanoma were also associated with a greater risk of mortality.

Underfilling of vacuum blood collection tubes leads to increased lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum and heparin plasma samples

Background Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) activity is routinely monitored for therapeutic risk stratification of malignant diseases, but is also prone to preanalytical influences. Methods We systematically analyzed the impact of defined preanalytical conditions on the hemolysis-susceptible parameters LD, potassium (K) and hemolysis index in vacuum blood collection tubes (serum [SE], heparin plasma [HP]). Blood was collected by venipuncture from healthy volunteers. Tubes were either filled or underfilled to approximately 50%, then processed directly or stored at room temperature for 4 h. Potassium (K), sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), LD, creatine kinase (CK), total cholesterol, and indices for hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia were analyzed. Filling velocity was determined in a subset of tubes. Findings in healthy volunteers were reconfirmed in an in-patient cohort (n = 74,751) that was analyzed for plasma yield and LD data distribution. Results LD activity was higher in HP compared to SE. Underfilling led to higher LD values (SE: +21.6%; HP: +28.3%), K (SE: +4.2%; HP: +5.3%), and hemolysis index (SE: +260.8%; HP: +210.0%), while other analytes remained largely unchanged. Filling velocity of tubes was approximately 3-fold higher in the first half compared to the second half in both HP and SE collection tubes. Importantly, plasma yield also inversely correlated with LD in routine patients. By calculating reference limits, the lowest plasma yield quartile of the patient cohort displayed LD values clearly exceeding current reference recommendations. Conclusions Underfilling of tubes leads to a higher proportion of blood aspirated with high velocity and relevant elevations in LD. This finding should be considered in cases of clinically implausible elevated LD activities.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts survival in small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases that were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy

This study aimed to identify factors that predict prognosis after radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs) from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study retrospectively evaluated 48 consecutive patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for BMs from SCLC between February 2008 and December 2017. WBRT was delivered at a median dose of 30 Gy (range: 30-40 Gy) in 10 fractions (range: 10-16 fractions). Clinical factors were tested for associations with overall survival after WBRT. The median survival and 1-year overall survival rate after WBRT treatment were 232 days and 34.4%, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that longer survival was associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, asymptomatic BMs, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the normal range, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-recursive partitioning analysis class 2, and a graded prognostic assessment score of ≥1.5 (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, longer survival was independently associated with asymptomatic BMs [hazard ratio for death (HR), 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.79; P < 0.05] and LDH in the normal range (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.83; P < 0.05). The presence of symptoms due to BMs and LDH values independently predicted prognosis after WBRT for BMs from SCLC. Elevated LDH may provide valuable information for identifying patients with BMs who could have poor survival outcomes.

Predicting prognosis of short survival time after palliative whole-brain radiotherapy

Using existing prognostic models, including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), it is difficult to identify patients with brain metastases (BMs) who are not likely to survive 2 months after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The purpose of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients who would not benefit clinically from WBRT. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 111 patients with BMs who were ineligible for surgery or stereotactic irradiation and who underwent WBRT between March 2013 and April 2016. Most patients were scheduled to receive a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Non-small cell lung cancer represented the most common primary cancer type (67%), followed by breast cancer (12%). Median survival time (MST) was 109 days (range, 4-883). Univariate analysis identified five factors significantly associated with poor prognosis: performance status (PS) 2-4, perilesional edema, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), using steroids during WBRT, and presence of hepatic metastases. Multivariate analysis confirmed elevated LDH (>300 IU/l) as an independent predictor. MST for LDH >300 IU/l (n = 30) and LDH ≤300 IU/L (n = 87) cohorts were 47 days and 148 days, respectively (P < 0.001). MSTs for GPA 0-1 patients (n = 85) with and without elevated LDH were 37 days and 123 days, respectively (P < 0.001). More than half of the patients with GPA 0-1 and elevated LDH died within two months. Adding elevated LDH to the GPA will permit identification of patients with BMs who have extremely unfavorable prognoses.

The prognostic value of the serum neuron specific enolase and lactate dehydrogenase in small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), pro-gastrin releasing peptide (ProGRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with clinical response and survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.One hundred thirty-six patients with SCLC were recruited in this study. All the patients received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 criteria. Serum samples were collected from SCLC patients before chemotherapy. NSE, ProGRP, and LDH levels were measured by commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay, and kinetic spectrophotometric method, respectively.Overall response rate was 71.3% with 97 patients who achieved complete response (CR) +  partial response (PR). NSE and LDH level declined in patients who achieved CR + PR compared with patients in stable disease (SD) and progress disease (PD). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that NSE > 50.324 ng/mL, stage ED, and distant metastases were independent risk factors for patients achieving CR + PR, and chemotherapy > 4 cycles was an independent protective factor in predicting CR + PR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves presented that expression of NSE, ProGRP, and LDH are of good predicting value for patients achieving CR + PR. Patients with a higher level of NSE and LDH presented worse progression-free survival and overall survival. In addition, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NSE level > 50.324 ng/mL and distant metastasis were independently correlated with worse OS.Serum NSE and LDH could be promising biomarkers for predicting therapy response and survival of SCLC patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Prognostic significance of serum LDH in small cell lung cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lactare dehydrogenase (LDH) has been proven to be a prognostic and a potential pro-tumor factor in patients with lung cancer. But the prognostic value of serum LDH in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not been quantified systematically.

OBJECTIVE

Thus, this study was to evaluate the correlations between serum LDH and overall survival of SLCLC by systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases were searched from inception to October 2014 and references in those publications would be included if the association between serum LDH and overall survival of SCLC can be derived. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed in the articles selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies including 4785 patients with SCLC were deemed eligible. Pooled results showed that SCLC patients with elevated LDH levels were associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.27∼ 1.66) of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests significant correlations between elevated serum LDH levels and poor overall survival in patients with SCLC. And serum LDH levels can be measured combining with other tools for assessing the risk stratification and prognosis of SCLC, which shows directions for treatments of SCLC.

The Regulation and Function of Lactate Dehydrogenase A: Therapeutic Potential in Brain Tumor

There are over 120 types of brain tumor and approximately 45% of primary brain tumors are gliomas, of which glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive with a median survival rate of 14 months. Despite progress in our knowledge, current therapies are unable to effectively combat primary brain tumors and patient survival remains poor. Tumor metabolism is important to consider in therapeutic approaches and is the focus of numerous research investigations. Lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) is a cytosolic enzyme, predominantly involved in anaerobic and aerobic glycolysis (the Warburg effect); however, it has multiple additional functions in non‐neoplastic and neoplastic tissues, which are not commonly known or discussed. This review summarizes what is currently known about the function of LDHA and identifies areas that would benefit from further exploration. The current knowledge of the role of LDHA in the brain and its potential as a therapeutic target for brain tumors will also be highlighted. The Warburg effect appears to be universal in tumors, including primary brain tumors, and LDHA (because of its involvement with this process) has been identified as a potential therapeutic target. Currently, there are, however, no suitable LDHA inhibitors available for tumor therapies in the clinic.

Lactate dehydrogenase A is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

Over 90% of cancer-related deaths in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are caused by tumor relapse and metastasis. Thus, there is an urgent need for new molecular markers that can potentiate the efficacy of the current clinical-based models of prognosis assessment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential significance of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), assessed by immunohistochemical staining, as a prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma in relation to clinicopathological features and clinical outcome.

Methods

We assessed the expression of LDHA at the protein level, by immunohistochemistry, and correlated its expression with multiple clinicopathological features including tumor size, clinical stage, histological grade, disease-free and overall survival in 385 patients with primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We also correlated the LDHA expression with overall survival, at mRNA level, in an independent data set of 170 clear cell renal cell carcinoma cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the potential clinicopathological factors were used to test for associations between the LDHA expression and both disease-free survival and overall survival.

Results

There is statistically significant positive correlation between LDHA level of expression and tumor size, clinical stage and histological grade. Moreover, LDHA expression shows significantly inverse correlation with both disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Our results are validated by examining LDHA expression, at the mRNA level, in the independent data set of clear cell renal cell carcinoma cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas databases which also shows that higher lactate dehydrogenase A expression is associated with significantly shorter overall survival.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that LDHA up-regulation can be a predictor of poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Thus, it represents a potential prognostic biomarker that can boost the accuracy of other prognostic models in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Prognostic models predicting survival of patients with brain metastases: integration of lactate dehydrogenase, albumin and extracranial organ involvement

AIMS

To explore the role of expanded assessment of metastatic extracranial organ involvement, as well as albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), i.e. surrogates of disease extent, in survival prediction models for patients with brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 189 patients treated with whole brain radiotherapy was carried out. Uni- and multivariate analyses included recursive partitioning analysis classes, basic score for brain metastases and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA).

RESULTS

Elevated LDH correlated significantly with extracranial organ involvement, low albumin with primary tumour type and primary tumour control. Elevated LDH, low albumin and a combination of both correlated significantly with overall survival. LDH, albumin and the number of extracranial organs involved (none, one, two or more harbouring metastases) were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analyses (if added to the three established scores mentioned above and also if added to individual parameters such as age, performance status, etc.). A combination of these three new prognostic factors predicted very short survival (median 0.7 months if all three were present).

CONCLUSION

We have previously defined patient groups in whom foregoing radiotherapy was unlikely to compromise survival. These were patients with a DS-GPA score of 0-1.5 points and age ≥75 years or Karnofsky performance status ≤50 or uncontrolled primary tumour with extracranial metastases to at least two organs. Patients with a combination of three new adverse features (elevated LDH plus low albumin plus extracranial metastases to at least two organs) might also be considered for best supportive care. Furthermore, it appears warranted to study whether scores such as DS-GPA can be optimised by integrating information on these three parameters.

Impact of systemic treatment on survival after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

Most patients with brain metastases have active extracranial disease, which limits survival unless effective systemic therapy can be administered. Available options have increased over the last 5 years. Therefore, we analyzed patient cohorts treated with or without systemic treatment after completion of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This study included retrospective uni- and multivariate analyses of 189 patients. Two landmark analyses requiring minimum survival of 1 or 2 months from start of WBRT were performed. Age and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) requirements were also applied in order to resemble a prospective trial that would limit inclusion to patients with defined baseline characteristics such as adequate KPS. Irrespective of these different statistical scenarios, systemic treatment significantly improved survival. For example, the 2-month landmark analysis with upper age limit and inclusion of patients with KPS > 60 only showed median survival of 9.0 versus 3.7 months, p = 0.001. All patients alive after more than 2 years had received systemic treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or other drugs). After WBRT, systemic treatment is a prerequisite for long-term survival. The exact magnitude of improvement can only be assessed in randomized trials because retrospective cohort studies, even if carefully designed, are not able to correct for all potential imbalances.

Radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with brain metastases and adverse prognostic factors

Several previous studies have suggested that patients with brain metastases should be treated with individualized approaches taking into account prognostic factors that influence survival. Whether or not radiotherapy represents overtreatment in patients with adverse prognostic features is currently being addressed in the randomized QUARTZ trial (best supportive care (BSC) vs. whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)). However, inclusion is limited to patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, we analyzed a broader patient population with different primary tumors managed with BSC or WBRT (intended total dose 20 or 30 Gy). Survival was examined by uni- and multivariate analyses including matched pairs. Median overall survival of all 113 patients was 2 months. No significant difference between BSC and 20 Gy WBRT was observed. A slight but significant improvement was observed in the 30 Gy WBRT group (median 2.2 vs. 1.7 months). The magnitude of difference is not clinically meaningful. Subgroup analyses revealed that improved survival after 30 Gy WBRT was limited to patients with primary small cell lung cancer. In conclusion, these results confirm and extent interim results from the QUARTZ trial, suggesting that BSC is a reasonable choice in patients with limited survival expectation. Further efforts are necessary to improve identification of patients who are likely to benefit from WBRT, e.g. by refining available survival prediction tools, and to confirm that management of those with small cell lung cancer should include a less restricted use of WBRT.