1
|
Lesser E, Azevedo AW, Phelps JS, Elabbady L, Cook A, Syed DS, Mark B, Kuroda S, Sustar A, Moussa A, Dallmann CJ, Agrawal S, Lee SYJ, Pratt B, Skutt-Kakaria K, Gerhard S, Lu R, Kemnitz N, Lee K, Halageri A, Castro M, Ih D, Gager J, Tammam M, Dorkenwald S, Collman F, Schneider-Mizell C, Brittain D, Jordan CS, Macrina T, Dickinson M, Lee WCA, Tuthill JC. Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in Drosophila. Nature 2024; 631:369-377. [PMID: 38926579 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07600-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Animal movement is controlled by motor neurons (MNs), which project out of the central nervous system to activate muscles1. MN activity is coordinated by complex premotor networks that facilitate the contribution of individual muscles to many different behaviours2-6. Here we use connectomics7 to analyse the wiring logic of premotor circuits controlling the Drosophila leg and wing. We find that both premotor networks cluster into modules that link MNs innervating muscles with related functions. Within most leg motor modules, the synaptic weights of each premotor neuron are proportional to the size of their target MNs, establishing a circuit basis for hierarchical MN recruitment. By contrast, wing premotor networks lack proportional synaptic connectivity, which may enable more flexible recruitment of wing steering muscles. Through comparison of the architecture of distinct motor control systems within the same animal, we identify common principles of premotor network organization and specializations that reflect the unique biomechanical constraints and evolutionary origins of leg and wing motor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Lesser
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony W Azevedo
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jasper S Phelps
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Neuroengineering Laboratory, Brain Mind Institute and Institute of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Leila Elabbady
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew Cook
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Brandon Mark
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sumiya Kuroda
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anne Sustar
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Moussa
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chris J Dallmann
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sweta Agrawal
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Su-Yee J Lee
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brandon Pratt
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Stephan Gerhard
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- UniDesign Solutions LLC, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ran Lu
- Zetta AI, LLC, Sherrill, NY, USA
| | | | - Kisuk Lee
- Zetta AI, LLC, Sherrill, NY, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Dodam Ih
- Zetta AI, LLC, Sherrill, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Chris S Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Wei-Chung Allen Lee
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - John C Tuthill
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lesser E, Azevedo AW, Phelps JS, Elabbady L, Cook A, Sakeena Syed D, Mark B, Kuroda S, Sustar A, Moussa A, Dallmann CJ, Agrawal S, Lee SYJ, Pratt B, Skutt-Kakaria K, Gerhard S, Lu R, Kemnitz N, Lee K, Halageri A, Castro M, Ih D, Gager J, Tammam M, Dorkenwald S, Collman F, Schneider-Mizell C, Brittain D, Jordan CS, Macrina T, Dickinson M, Lee WCA, Tuthill JC. Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.05.30.542725. [PMID: 37398440 PMCID: PMC10312524 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.30.542725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Animal movement is controlled by motor neurons (MNs), which project out of the central nervous system to activate muscles. MN activity is coordinated by complex premotor networks that allow individual muscles to contribute to many different behaviors. Here, we use connectomics to analyze the wiring logic of premotor circuits controlling the Drosophila leg and wing. We find that both premotor networks cluster into modules that link MNs innervating muscles with related functions. Within most leg motor modules, the synaptic weights of each premotor neuron are proportional to the size of their target MNs, establishing a circuit basis for hierarchical MN recruitment. In contrast, wing premotor networks lack proportional synaptic connectivity, which may allow wing steering muscles to be recruited with different relative timing. By comparing the architecture of distinct limb motor control systems within the same animal, we identify common principles of premotor network organization and specializations that reflect the unique biomechanical constraints and evolutionary origins of leg and wing motor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Lesser
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Anthony W. Azevedo
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Jasper S. Phelps
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leila Elabbady
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Andrew Cook
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | | | - Brandon Mark
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Sumiya Kuroda
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anne Sustar
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Moussa
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Chris J. Dallmann
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Sweta Agrawal
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Su-Yee J. Lee
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | - Brandon Pratt
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| | | | - Stephan Gerhard
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- UniDesign Solutions LLC, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Kisuk Lee
- Zetta AI, LLC, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Chris S. Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Wei-Chung Allen Lee
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
| | - John C. Tuthill
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Celii B, Papadopoulos S, Ding Z, Fahey PG, Wang E, Papadopoulos C, Kunin AB, Patel S, Bae JA, Bodor AL, Brittain D, Buchanan J, Bumbarger DJ, Castro MA, Cobos E, Dorkenwald S, Elabbady L, Halageri A, Jia Z, Jordan C, Kapner D, Kemnitz N, Kinn S, Lee K, Li K, Lu R, Macrina T, Mahalingam G, Mitchell E, Mondal SS, Mu S, Nehoran B, Popovych S, Schneider-Mizell CM, Silversmith W, Takeno M, Torres R, Turner NL, Wong W, Wu J, Yu SC, Yin W, Xenes D, Kitchell LM, Rivlin PK, Rose VA, Bishop CA, Wester B, Froudarakis E, Walker EY, Sinz F, Seung HS, Collman F, da Costa NM, Reid RC, Pitkow X, Tolias AS, Reimer J. NEURD: automated proofreading and feature extraction for connectomics. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.03.14.532674. [PMID: 36993282 PMCID: PMC10055177 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.14.532674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
We are now in the era of millimeter-scale electron microscopy (EM) volumes collected at nanometer resolution (Shapson-Coe et al., 2021; Consortium et al., 2021). Dense reconstruction of cellular compartments in these EM volumes has been enabled by recent advances in Machine Learning (ML) (Lee et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2021; Macrina et al., 2021). Automated segmentation methods can now yield exceptionally accurate reconstructions of cells, but despite this accuracy, laborious post-hoc proofreading is still required to generate large connectomes free of merge and split errors. The elaborate 3-D meshes of neurons produced by these segmentations contain detailed morphological information, from the diameter, shape, and branching patterns of axons and dendrites, down to the fine-scale structure of dendritic spines. However, extracting information about these features can require substantial effort to piece together existing tools into custom workflows. Building on existing open-source software for mesh manipulation, here we present "NEURD", a software package that decomposes each meshed neuron into a compact and extensively-annotated graph representation. With these feature-rich graphs, we implement workflows to automate a variety of tasks that would otherwise require extensive manual effort, such as state of the art automated post-hoc proofreading of merge errors, cell classification, spine detection, axon-dendritic proximities, and computation of other features. These features enable many downstream analyses of neural morphology and connectivity, making these new massive and complex datasets more accessible to neuroscience researchers focused on a variety of scientific questions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dummer PD, Lee DI, Hossain S, Wang R, Evard A, Newman G, Ho C, Schneider-Mizell CM, Menon V, Au E. Multidimensional analysis of cortical interneuron synaptic features reveals underlying synaptic heterogeneity. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.22.586340. [PMID: 38659827 PMCID: PMC11042224 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.22.586340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Cortical interneurons represent a diverse set of neuronal subtypes characterized in part by their striking degree of synaptic specificity. However, little is known about the extent of synaptic diversity because of the lack of unbiased methods to extract synaptic features among interneuron subtypes. Here, we develop an approach to aggregate image features from fluorescent confocal images of interneuron synapses and their post-synaptic targets, in order to characterize the heterogeneity of synapses at fine scale. We started by training a model that recognizes pre- and post-synaptic compartments and then determines the target of each genetically-identified interneuron synapse in vitro and in vivo. Our model extracts hundreds of spatial and intensity features from each analyzed synapse, constructing a multidimensional data set, consisting of millions of synapses, which allowed us to perform an unsupervised analysis on this dataset, uncovering novel synaptic subgroups. The subgroups were spatially distributed in a highly structured manner that revealed the local underlying topology of the postsynaptic environment. Dendrite-targeting subgroups were clustered onto subdomains of the dendrite along the proximal to distal axis. Soma-targeting subgroups were enriched onto different postsynaptic cell types. We also find that the two main subclasses of interneurons, basket cells and somatostatin interneurons, utilize distinct strategies to enact inhibitory coverage. Thus, our analysis of multidimensional synaptic features establishes a conceptual framework for studying interneuron synaptic diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick D. Dummer
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Dylan I. Lee
- Department of Neurology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Sakib Hossain
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Runsheng Wang
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Andre Evard
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Gabriel Newman
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Claire Ho
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | | | - Vilas Menon
- Department of Neurology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| | - Edmund Au
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
- Columbia Translation Neuroscience Initiative Fellow, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York NY, 10032
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsliah A, Yu SC, Kruk K, Bland D, Burke A, Gager J, Hebditch J, Silverman B, Willie K, Willie RW, Sorek M, Sterling AR, Kind E, Garner D, Sancer G, Wernet MF, Kim SS, Murthy M, Seung HS. Neuronal "parts list" and wiring diagram for a visual system. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.10.12.562119. [PMID: 37873160 PMCID: PMC10592826 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.12.562119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
A catalog of neuronal cell types has often been called a "parts list" of the brain, and regarded as a prerequisite for understanding brain function. In the optic lobe of Drosophila, rules of connectivity between cell types have already proven essential for understanding fly vision. Here we analyze the fly connectome to complete the list of cell types intrinsic to the optic lobe, as well as the rules governing their connectivity. We more than double the list of known types. Most new cell types contain between 10 and 100 cells, and integrate information over medium distances in the visual field. Some existing type families (Tm, Li, and LPi) at least double in number of types. We introduce a new Sm interneuron family, which contains more types than any other, and three new families of cross-neuropil types. Self-consistency of cell types is demonstrated through automatic assignment of cells to types by distance in high-dimensional feature space, and further validation is provided by algorithms that select small subsets of discriminative features. Cell types with similar connectivity patterns divide into clusters that are interpretable in terms of motion, object, and color vision. Our work showcases the advantages of connectomic cell typing: complete and unbiased sampling, a rich array of features based on connectivity, and reduction of the connectome to a drastically simpler wiring diagram of cell types, with immediate relevance for brain function and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | - Doug Bland
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - Austin Burke
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | | | - Kyle Willie
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | | | | | - Emil Kind
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Dustin Garner
- Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Univ. C alifornia Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Gizem Sancer
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Mathias F Wernet
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Sung Soo Kim
- Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Univ. C alifornia Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, U SA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eisenstein M. A milestone map of mouse-brain connectivity reveals challenging new terrain for scientists. Nature 2024; 628:677-679. [PMID: 38622253 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-01096-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
|
7
|
Lagzi F, Fairhall AL. Emergence of co-tuning in inhibitory neurons as a network phenomenon mediated by randomness, correlations, and homeostatic plasticity. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadi4350. [PMID: 38507489 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi4350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Cortical excitatory neurons show clear tuning to stimulus features, but the tuning properties of inhibitory interneurons are ambiguous. While inhibitory neurons have been considered to be largely untuned, some studies show that some parvalbumin-expressing (PV) neurons do show feature selectivity and participate in co-tuned subnetworks with pyramidal neurons. In this study, we first use mean-field theory to demonstrate that a combination of homeostatic plasticity governing the synaptic dynamics of the connections from PV to excitatory neurons, heterogeneity in the excitatory postsynaptic potentials that impinge on PV neurons, and shared correlated input from layer 4 results in the functional and structural self-organization of PV subnetworks. Second, we show that structural and functional feature tuning of PV neurons emerges more clearly at the network level, i.e., that population-level measures identify functional and structural co-tuning of PV neurons that are not evident in pairwise individual-level measures. Finally, we show that such co-tuning can enhance network stability at the cost of reduced feature selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fereshteh Lagzi
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA
- Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA
| | - Adrienne L Fairhall
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA
- Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang A, Jin L, Yao S, Matsuyama M, van Velthoven CTJ, Sullivan HA, Sun N, Kellis M, Tasic B, Wickersham I, Chen X. Rabies virus-based barcoded neuroanatomy resolved by single-cell RNA and in situ sequencing. eLife 2024; 12:RP87866. [PMID: 38319699 PMCID: PMC10942611 DOI: 10.7554/elife.87866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Mapping the connectivity of diverse neuronal types provides the foundation for understanding the structure and function of neural circuits. High-throughput and low-cost neuroanatomical techniques based on RNA barcode sequencing have the potential to map circuits at cellular resolution and a brain-wide scale, but existing Sindbis virus-based techniques can only map long-range projections using anterograde tracing approaches. Rabies virus can complement anterograde tracing approaches by enabling either retrograde labeling of projection neurons or monosynaptic tracing of direct inputs to genetically targeted postsynaptic neurons. However, barcoded rabies virus has so far been only used to map non-neuronal cellular interactions in vivo and synaptic connectivity of cultured neurons. Here we combine barcoded rabies virus with single-cell and in situ sequencing to perform retrograde labeling and transsynaptic labeling in the mouse brain. We sequenced 96 retrogradely labeled cells and 295 transsynaptically labeled cells using single-cell RNA-seq, and 4130 retrogradely labeled cells and 2914 transsynaptically labeled cells in situ. We found that the transcriptomic identities of rabies virus-infected cells can be robustly identified using both single-cell RNA-seq and in situ sequencing. By associating gene expression with connectivity inferred from barcode sequencing, we distinguished long-range projecting cortical cell types from multiple cortical areas and identified cell types with converging or diverging synaptic connectivity. Combining in situ sequencing with barcoded rabies virus complements existing sequencing-based neuroanatomical techniques and provides a potential path for mapping synaptic connectivity of neuronal types at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aixin Zhang
- Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUnited States
| | - Lei Jin
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| | - Shenqin Yao
- Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUnited States
| | - Makoto Matsuyama
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| | | | - Heather Anne Sullivan
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| | - Na Sun
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
| | - Manolis Kellis
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
| | | | - Ian Wickersham
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| | - Xiaoyin Chen
- Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patiño M, Lagos WN, Patne NS, Miyazaki PA, Bhamidipati SK, Collman F, Callaway EM. Postsynaptic cell type and synaptic distance do not determine efficiency of monosynaptic rabies virus spread measured at synaptic resolution. eLife 2023; 12:e89297. [PMID: 38096019 PMCID: PMC10721217 DOI: 10.7554/elife.89297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Retrograde monosynaptic tracing using glycoprotein-deleted rabies virus is an important component of the toolkit for investigation of neural circuit structure and connectivity. It allows for the identification of first-order presynaptic connections to cell populations of interest across both the central and peripheral nervous system, helping to decipher the complex connectivity patterns of neural networks that give rise to brain function. Despite its utility, the factors that influence the probability of transsynaptic rabies spread are not well understood. While it is well established that expression levels of rabies glycoprotein used to trans-complement G-deleted rabies can result in large changes in numbers of inputs labeled per starter cell (convergence index [CI]), it is not known how typical values of CI relate to the proportions of synaptic contacts or input neurons labeled. And it is not known whether inputs to different cell types, or synaptic contacts that are more proximal or distal to the cell body, are labeled with different probabilities. Here, we use a new rabies virus construct that allows for the simultaneous labeling of pre- and postsynaptic specializations to quantify the proportion of synaptic contacts labeled in mouse primary visual cortex. We demonstrate that with typical conditions about 40% of first-order presynaptic excitatory synapses to cortical excitatory and inhibitory neurons are labeled. We show that using matched tracing conditions there are similar proportions of labeled contacts onto L4 excitatory pyramidal, somatostatin (Sst) inhibitory, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (Vip) starter cell types. Furthermore, we find no difference in the proportions of labeled excitatory contacts onto postsynaptic sites at different subcellular locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maribel Patiño
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUnited States
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUnited States
| | - Willian N Lagos
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
| | - Neelakshi S Patne
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
| | - Paula A Miyazaki
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
| | - Sai Krishna Bhamidipati
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
| | | | - Edward M Callaway
- Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological StudiesLa JollaUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sorensen SA, Gouwens NW, Wang Y, Mallory M, Budzillo A, Dalley R, Lee B, Gliko O, Kuo HC, Kuang X, Mann R, Ahmadinia L, Alfiler L, Baftizadeh F, Baker K, Bannick S, Bertagnolli D, Bickley K, Bohn P, Brown D, Bomben J, Brouner K, Chen C, Chen K, Chvilicek M, Collman F, Daigle T, Dawes T, de Frates R, Dee N, DePartee M, Egdorf T, El-Hifnawi L, Enstrom R, Esposito L, Farrell C, Gala R, Glomb A, Gamlin C, Gary A, Goldy J, Gu H, Hadley K, Hawrylycz M, Henry A, Hill D, Hirokawa KE, Huang Z, Johnson K, Juneau Z, Kebede S, Kim L, Lee C, Lesnar P, Li A, Glomb A, Li Y, Liang E, Link K, Maxwell M, McGraw M, McMillen DA, Mukora A, Ng L, Ochoa T, Oldre A, Park D, Pom CA, Popovich Z, Potekhina L, Rajanbabu R, Ransford S, Reding M, Ruiz A, Sandman D, Siverts L, Smith KA, Stoecklin M, Sulc J, Tieu M, Ting J, Trinh J, Vargas S, Vumbaco D, Walker M, Wang M, Wanner A, Waters J, Williams G, Wilson J, Xiong W, Lein E, Berg J, Kalmbach B, Yao S, Gong H, Luo Q, Ng L, Sümbül U, Jarsky T, Yao Z, Tasic B, Zeng H. Connecting single-cell transcriptomes to projectomes in mouse visual cortex. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.25.568393. [PMID: 38168270 PMCID: PMC10760188 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.25.568393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
The mammalian brain is composed of diverse neuron types that play different functional roles. Recent single-cell RNA sequencing approaches have led to a whole brain taxonomy of transcriptomically-defined cell types, yet cell type definitions that include multiple cellular properties can offer additional insights into a neuron's role in brain circuits. While the Patch-seq method can investigate how transcriptomic properties relate to the local morphological and electrophysiological properties of cell types, linking transcriptomic identities to long-range projections is a major unresolved challenge. To address this, we collected coordinated Patch-seq and whole brain morphology data sets of excitatory neurons in mouse visual cortex. From the Patch-seq data, we defined 16 integrated morpho-electric-transcriptomic (MET)-types; in parallel, we reconstructed the complete morphologies of 300 neurons. We unified the two data sets with a multi-step classifier, to integrate cell type assignments and interrogate cross-modality relationships. We find that transcriptomic variations within and across MET-types correspond with morphological and electrophysiological phenotypes. In addition, this variation, along with the anatomical location of the cell, can be used to predict the projection targets of individual neurons. We also shed new light on infragranular cell types and circuits, including cell-type-specific, interhemispheric projections. With this approach, we establish a comprehensive, integrated taxonomy of excitatory neuron types in mouse visual cortex and create a system for integrated, high-dimensional cell type classification that can be extended to the whole brain and potentially across species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yun Wang
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiuli Kuang
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chao Chen
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Kai Chen
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nick Dee
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hong Gu
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zili Huang
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Kim
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | - Anan Li
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- HUST-Suzhou Institute for Brainsmatics, JITRI Institute for Brainsmatics, Suzhou, China
| | | | - Yaoyao Li
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zoran Popovich
- University of Washington, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wei Xiong
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ed Lein
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | - Jim Berg
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | - Hui Gong
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- HUST-Suzhou Institute for Brainsmatics, JITRI Institute for Brainsmatics, Suzhou, China
| | - Qingming Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China
| | - Lydia Ng
- Allen Institute for Brain Science
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sosa MJ, Shih AY, Bonney SK. The elusive brain perivascular fibroblast: a potential role in vascular stability and homeostasis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1283434. [PMID: 38075961 PMCID: PMC10704358 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1283434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the brain, perivascular fibroblasts (PVFs) reside within the perivascular spaces (PVSs) of arterioles and large venules, however their physiological and pathophysiological roles remain largely unknown. PVFs express numerous extracellular matrix proteins that are found in the basement membrane and PVS surrounding large diameter vessels. PVFs are sandwiched between the mural cell layer and astrocytic endfeet, where they are poised to interact with mural cells, perivascular macrophages, and astrocytes. We draw connections between the more well-studied PVF pro-fibrotic response in ischemic injury and the less understood thickening of the vascular wall and enlargement of the PVS described in dementia and neurodegenerative diseases. We postulate that PVFs may be responsible for stability and homeostasis of the brain vasculature, and may also contribute to changes within the PVS during disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J. Sosa
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andy Y. Shih
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Stephanie K. Bonney
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang A, Jin L, Yao S, Matsuyama M, van Velthoven C, Sullivan H, Sun N, Kellis M, Tasic B, Wickersham IR, Chen X. Rabies virus-based barcoded neuroanatomy resolved by single-cell RNA and in situ sequencing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.16.532873. [PMID: 36993334 PMCID: PMC10055146 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.16.532873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Mapping the connectivity of diverse neuronal types provides the foundation for understanding the structure and function of neural circuits. High-throughput and low-cost neuroanatomical techniques based on RNA barcode sequencing have the potential to map circuits at cellular resolution and a brain-wide scale, but existing Sindbis virus-based techniques can only map long-range projections using anterograde tracing approaches. Rabies virus can complement anterograde tracing approaches by enabling either retrograde labeling of projection neurons or monosynaptic tracing of direct inputs to genetically targeted postsynaptic neurons. However, barcoded rabies virus has so far been only used to map non-neuronal cellular interactions in vivo and synaptic connectivity of cultured neurons. Here we combine barcoded rabies virus with single-cell and in situ sequencing to perform retrograde labeling and transsynaptic labeling in the mouse brain. We sequenced 96 retrogradely labeled cells and 295 transsynaptically labeled cells using single-cell RNA-seq, and 4,130 retrogradely labeled cells and 2,914 transsynaptically labeled cells in situ. We found that the transcriptomic identities of rabies virus-infected cells can be robustly identified using both single-cell RNA-seq and in situ sequencing. By associating gene expression with connectivity inferred from barcode sequencing, we distinguished long-range projecting cortical cell types from multiple cortical areas and identified cell types with converging or diverging synaptic connectivity. Combining in situ sequencing with barcoded rabies virus complements existing sequencing-based neuroanatomical techniques and provides a potential path for mapping synaptic connectivity of neuronal types at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aixin Zhang
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA
| | - Lei Jin
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Current address: Lingang Laboratory, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenqin Yao
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA
| | - Makoto Matsuyama
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Current address: Metcela Inc., Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Heather Sullivan
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Na Sun
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Manolis Kellis
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Ian R. Wickersham
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dorkenwald S, Schneider-Mizell CM, Brittain D, Halageri A, Jordan C, Kemnitz N, Castro MA, Silversmith W, Maitin-Shephard J, Troidl J, Pfister H, Gillet V, Xenes D, Bae JA, Bodor AL, Buchanan J, Bumbarger DJ, Elabbady L, Jia Z, Kapner D, Kinn S, Lee K, Li K, Lu R, Macrina T, Mahalingam G, Mitchell E, Mondal SS, Mu S, Nehoran B, Popovych S, Takeno M, Torres R, Turner NL, Wong W, Wu J, Yin W, Yu SC, Reid RC, da Costa NM, Seung HS, Collman F. CAVE: Connectome Annotation Versioning Engine. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.26.550598. [PMID: 37546753 PMCID: PMC10402030 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.26.550598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Advances in Electron Microscopy, image segmentation and computational infrastructure have given rise to large-scale and richly annotated connectomic datasets which are increasingly shared across communities. To enable collaboration, users need to be able to concurrently create new annotations and correct errors in the automated segmentation by proofreading. In large datasets, every proofreading edit relabels cell identities of millions of voxels and thousands of annotations like synapses. For analysis, users require immediate and reproducible access to this constantly changing and expanding data landscape. Here, we present the Connectome Annotation Versioning Engine (CAVE), a computational infrastructure for immediate and reproducible connectome analysis in up-to petascale datasets (~1mm3) while proofreading and annotating is ongoing. For segmentation, CAVE provides a distributed proofreading infrastructure for continuous versioning of large reconstructions. Annotations in CAVE are defined by locations such that they can be quickly assigned to the underlying segment which enables fast analysis queries of CAVE's data for arbitrary time points. CAVE supports schematized, extensible annotations, so that researchers can readily design novel annotation types. CAVE is already used for many connectomics datasets, including the largest datasets available to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Akhilesh Halageri
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Chris Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Nico Kemnitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Manual A. Castro
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Jakob Troidl
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, USA
| | - Hanspeter Pfister
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, USA
| | - Valentin Gillet
- Lund University, Department of Biology, Lund Vision Group, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Xenes
- Research & Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
| | - J. Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhen Jia
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Sam Kinn
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Kisuk Lee
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
| | - Kai Li
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Eric Mitchell
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shanka Subhra Mondal
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shang Mu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Barak Nehoran
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Sergiy Popovych
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Marc Takeno
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Nicholas L. Turner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - William Wong
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Wenjing Yin
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Szi-chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - H. Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ding Z, Fahey PG, Papadopoulos S, Wang EY, Celii B, Papadopoulos C, Kunin AB, Chang A, Fu J, Ding Z, Patel S, Ponder K, Muhammad T, Bae JA, Bodor AL, Brittain D, Buchanan J, Bumbarger DJ, Castro MA, Cobos E, Dorkenwald S, Elabbady L, Halageri A, Jia Z, Jordan C, Kapner D, Kemnitz N, Kinn S, Lee K, Li K, Lu R, Macrina T, Mahalingam G, Mitchell E, Mondal SS, Mu S, Nehoran B, Popovych S, Schneider-Mizell CM, Silversmith W, Takeno M, Torres R, Turner NL, Wong W, Wu J, Yin W, Yu SC, Froudarakis E, Sinz F, Seung HS, Collman F, da Costa NM, Reid RC, Walker EY, Pitkow X, Reimer J, Tolias AS. Functional connectomics reveals general wiring rule in mouse visual cortex. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.13.531369. [PMID: 36993398 PMCID: PMC10054929 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.13.531369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
To understand how the brain computes, it is important to unravel the relationship between circuit connectivity and function. Previous research has shown that excitatory neurons in layer 2/3 of the primary visual cortex of mice with similar response properties are more likely to form connections. However, technical challenges of combining synaptic connectivity and functional measurements have limited these studies to few, highly local connections. Utilizing the millimeter scale and nanometer resolution of the MICrONS dataset, we studied the connectivity-function relationship in excitatory neurons of the mouse visual cortex across interlaminar and interarea projections, assessing connection selectivity at the coarse axon trajectory and fine synaptic formation levels. A digital twin model of this mouse, that accurately predicted responses to arbitrary video stimuli, enabled a comprehensive characterization of the function of neurons. We found that neurons with highly correlated responses to natural videos tended to be connected with each other, not only within the same cortical area but also across multiple layers and visual areas, including feedforward and feedback connections, whereas we did not find that orientation preference predicted connectivity. The digital twin model separated each neuron's tuning into a feature component (what the neuron responds to) and a spatial component (where the neuron's receptive field is located). We show that the feature, but not the spatial component, predicted which neurons were connected at the fine synaptic scale. Together, our results demonstrate the "like-to-like" connectivity rule generalizes to multiple connection types, and the rich MICrONS dataset is suitable to further refine a mechanistic understanding of circuit structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuokun Ding
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Paul G Fahey
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Stelios Papadopoulos
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Eric Y Wang
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Brendan Celii
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Christos Papadopoulos
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Alexander B Kunin
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Mathematics, Creighton University, Omaha, USA
| | - Andersen Chang
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Jiakun Fu
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Zhiwei Ding
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Saumil Patel
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Kayla Ponder
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Taliah Muhammad
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - J Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Manuel A Castro
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Erick Cobos
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Akhilesh Halageri
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Zhen Jia
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Chris Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Dan Kapner
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Nico Kemnitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Sam Kinn
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Kisuk Lee
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
| | - Kai Li
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Eric Mitchell
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shanka Subhra Mondal
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shang Mu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Barak Nehoran
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Sergiy Popovych
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Marc Takeno
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Nicholas L Turner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - William Wong
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Wenjing Yin
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Emmanouil Froudarakis
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Fabian Sinz
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Greece
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - R Clay Reid
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Edgar Y Walker
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Xaq Pitkow
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, USA
| | - Jacob Reimer
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Andreas S Tolias
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gamlin CR, Schneider-Mizell CM, Mallory M, Elabbady L, Gouwens N, Williams G, Mukora A, Dalley R, Bodor A, Brittain D, Buchanan J, Bumbarger D, Kapner D, Kinn S, Mahalingam G, Seshamani S, Takeno M, Torres R, Yin W, Nicovich PR, Bae JA, Castro MA, Dorkenwald S, Halageri A, Jia Z, Jordan C, Kemnitz N, Lee K, Li K, Lu R, Macrina T, Mitchell E, Mondal SS, Mu S, Nehoran B, Popovych S, Silversmith W, Turner NL, Wong W, Wu J, Yu S, Berg J, Jarsky T, Lee B, Seung HS, Zeng H, Reid RC, Collman F, da Costa NM, Sorensen SA. Integrating EM and Patch-seq data: Synaptic connectivity and target specificity of predicted Sst transcriptomic types. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.22.533857. [PMID: 36993629 PMCID: PMC10055412 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.22.533857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Neural circuit function is shaped both by the cell types that comprise the circuit and the connections between those cell types 1 . Neural cell types have previously been defined by morphology 2, 3 , electrophysiology 4, 5 , transcriptomic expression 6-8 , connectivity 9-13 , or even a combination of such modalities 14-16 . More recently, the Patch-seq technique has enabled the characterization of morphology (M), electrophysiology (E), and transcriptomic (T) properties from individual cells 17-20 . Using this technique, these properties were integrated to define 28, inhibitory multimodal, MET-types in mouse primary visual cortex 21 . It is unknown how these MET-types connect within the broader cortical circuitry however. Here we show that we can predict the MET-type identity of inhibitory cells within a large-scale electron microscopy (EM) dataset and these MET-types have distinct ultrastructural features and synapse connectivity patterns. We found that EM Martinotti cells, a well defined morphological cell type 22, 23 known to be Somatostatin positive (Sst+) 24, 25 , were successfully predicted to belong to Sst+ MET-types. Each identified MET-type had distinct axon myelination patterns and synapsed onto specific excitatory targets. Our results demonstrate that morphological features can be used to link cell type identities across imaging modalities, which enables further comparison of connectivity in relation to transcriptomic or electrophysiological properties. Furthermore, our results show that MET-types have distinct connectivity patterns, supporting the use of MET-types and connectivity to meaningfully define cell types.
Collapse
|