1
|
Pan Z, El Sharkway R, Bayoumi A, Metwally M, Gloss BS, Brink R, Lu DB, Liddle C, Alqahtani SA, Yu J, O'Connell PJ, George J, Eslam M. Inhibition of MERTK reduces organ fibrosis in mouse models of fibrotic disease. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eadj0133. [PMID: 38569018 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adj0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) drives fibrosis and disease progression in a number of chronic disorders, but targeting this ubiquitously expressed cytokine may not yield a viable and safe antifibrotic therapy. Here, we sought to identify alternative ways to inhibit TGFβ signaling using human hepatic stellate cells and macrophages from humans and mice in vitro, as well as mouse models of liver, kidney, and lung fibrosis. We identified Mer tyrosine kinase (MERTK) as a TGFβ-inducible effector of fibrosis that was up-regulated during fibrosis in multiple organs in three mouse models. We confirmed these findings in liver biopsy samples from patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). MERTK also induced TGFβ expression and drove TGFβ signaling resulting in a positive feedback loop that promoted fibrosis in cultured cells. MERTK regulated both canonical and noncanonical TGFβ signaling in both mouse and human cells in vitro. MERTK increased transcription of genes regulating fibrosis by modulating chromatin accessibility and RNA polymerase II activity. In each of the three mouse models, disrupting the fibrosis-promoting signaling loop by reducing MERTK expression reduced organ fibrosis. Pharmacological inhibition of MERTK reduced fibrosis in these mouse models either when initiated immediately after injury or when initiated after fibrosis was established. Together, these data suggest that MERTK plays a role in modulating organ fibrosis and may be a potential target for treating fibrotic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyan Pan
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Rasha El Sharkway
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Ali Bayoumi
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Mayada Metwally
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Brian S Gloss
- Westmead Research Hub, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Robert Brink
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- St. Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Bo Lu
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Christopher Liddle
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Saleh A Alqahtani
- Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jun Yu
- Institute of Digestive Disease and Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK-Shenzhen Research Institute, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
| | - Philip J O'Connell
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Jacob George
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Mohammed Eslam
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smallegan MJ, Shehata S, Spradlin SF, Swearingen A, Wheeler G, Das A, Corbet G, Nebenfuehr B, Ahrens D, Tauber D, Lennon S, Choi K, Huynh T, Wieser T, Schneider K, Bradshaw M, Basken J, Lai M, Read T, Hynes-Grace M, Timmons D, Demasi J, Rinn JL. Genome-wide binding analysis of 195 DNA binding proteins reveals "reservoir" promoters and human specific SVA-repeat family regulation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0237055. [PMID: 34166368 PMCID: PMC8224974 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A key aspect in defining cell state is the complex choreography of DNA binding events in a given cell type, which in turn establishes a cell-specific gene-expression program. Here we wanted to take a deep analysis of DNA binding events and transcriptional output of a single cell state (K562 cells). To this end we re-analyzed 195 DNA binding proteins contained in ENCODE data. We used standardized analysis pipelines, containerization, and literate programming with R Markdown for reproducibility and rigor. Our approach validated many findings from previous independent studies, underscoring the importance of ENCODE's goals in providing these reproducible data resources. We also had several new findings including: (i) 1,362 promoters, which we refer to as 'reservoirs,' that are defined by having up to 111 different DNA binding-proteins localized on one promoter, yet do not have any expression of steady-state RNA (ii) Reservoirs do not overlap super-enhancer annotations and distinct have distinct properties from super-enhancers. (iii) The human specific SVA repeat element may have been co-opted for enhancer regulation and is highly transcribed in PRO-seq and RNA-seq. Collectively, this study performed by the students of a CU Boulder computational biology class (BCHM 5631 -Spring 2020) demonstrates the value of reproducible findings and how resources like ENCODE that prioritize data standards can foster new findings with existing data in a didactic environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Smallegan
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MS); (JR)
| | - Soraya Shehata
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Savannah F. Spradlin
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Alison Swearingen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Graycen Wheeler
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Arpan Das
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Giulia Corbet
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Nebenfuehr
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Daniel Ahrens
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Devin Tauber
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Shelby Lennon
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Kevin Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Thao Huynh
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Tom Wieser
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Kristen Schneider
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Michael Bradshaw
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Biochemistry 5631 Spring 2020, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Joel Basken
- Arpeggio Biosciences, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Maria Lai
- Arpeggio Biosciences, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Timothy Read
- Arpeggio Biosciences, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Matt Hynes-Grace
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Dan Timmons
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Jon Demasi
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | - John L. Rinn
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MS); (JR)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boettiger A, Murphy S. Advances in Chromatin Imaging at Kilobase-Scale Resolution. Trends Genet 2020; 36:273-287. [PMID: 32007290 PMCID: PMC7197267 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
It is now widely appreciated that the spatial organization of the genome is nonrandom, and its complex 3D folding has important consequences for many genome processes. Recent developments in multiplexed, super-resolution microscopy have enabled an unprecedented view of the polymeric structure of chromatin - from the loose folds of whole chromosomes to the detailed loops of cis-regulatory elements that regulate gene expression. Facilitated by the use of robotics, microfluidics, and improved approaches to super-resolution, thousands to hundreds of thousands of individual cells can now be analyzed in an individual experiment. This has led to new insights into the nature of genomic structural features identified by sequencing, such as topologically associated domains (TADs), and the nature of enhancer-promoter interactions underlying transcriptional regulation. We review these recent improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair Boettiger
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Sedona Murphy
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Monribot-Villanueva J, Zurita M, Vázquez M. Developmental transcriptional regulation by SUMOylation, an evolving field. Genesis 2017; 55. [PMID: 27935206 DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
SUMOylation is a reversible post-translational protein modification that affects the intracellular localization, stability, activity, and interactions of its protein targets. The SUMOylation pathway influences several nuclear and cytoplasmic processes. The expression of many genes, in particular those involved in development is finely tuned in space and time by several groups of proteins. There is growing evidence that transcriptional regulation mechanisms involve direct SUMOylation of transcriptional-related proteins such as initiation and elongation factors, and subunits of chromatin modifier and remodeling complexes originally described as members of the trithorax and Polycomb groups in Drosophila. Therefore, it is being unveiled that SUMOylation has a role in both, gene silencing and gene activation mechanisms. The goal of this review is to discuss the information on how SUMO modification in components of these multi-subunit complexes may have an effect in genome architecture and function and, therefore, in the regulation of gene expression in time and space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Monribot-Villanueva
- Departamento de Fisiología Molecular y Genética del Desarrollo, Instituto de Biotecnología-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| | - Mario Zurita
- Departamento de Fisiología Molecular y Genética del Desarrollo, Instituto de Biotecnología-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| | - Martha Vázquez
- Departamento de Fisiología Molecular y Genética del Desarrollo, Instituto de Biotecnología-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cookson VJ, Waite SL, Heath PR, Hurd PJ, Gandhi SV, Chapman NR. Binding loci of RelA-containing nuclear factor-kappaB dimers in promoter regions of PHM1-31 myometrial smooth muscle cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2015; 21:865-83. [DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gav051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
6
|
GC skew defines distinct RNA polymerase pause sites in CpG island promoters. Genome Res 2015; 25:1600-9. [PMID: 26275623 PMCID: PMC4617957 DOI: 10.1101/gr.189068.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
CpG islands (CGIs) are associated with over half of human gene promoters and are characterized by a unique chromatin environment and high levels of bidirectional transcriptional activity relative to surrounding genomic regions, suggesting that RNA polymerase (Pol II) progression past the CGI boundaries is restricted. Here we describe a novel transcriptional regulatory step wherein Pol II encounters an additional barrier to elongation distinct from the promoter-proximal pause and occurring at the downstream boundary of the CGI domain. For most CGI-associated promoters, Pol II exhibits a dominant pause at either the promoter-proximal or this distal site that correlates, both in position and in intensity, with local regions of high GC skew, a sequence feature known to form unique secondary structures. Upon signal-induced gene activation, long-range enhancer contacts at the dominant pause site are selectively enhanced, suggesting a new role for enhancers at the downstream pause. These data point to an additional level of control over transcriptional output at a subset of CGI-associated genes that is linked to DNA sequence and the integrity of the CGI domain.
Collapse
|
7
|
Erokhin M, Vassetzky Y, Georgiev P, Chetverina D. Eukaryotic enhancers: common features, regulation, and participation in diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 2015; 72:2361-75. [PMID: 25715743 PMCID: PMC11114076 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-015-1871-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Revised: 02/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Enhancers are positive DNA regulatory sequences controlling temporal and tissue-specific gene expression. These elements act independently of their orientation and distance relative to the promoters of target genes. Enhancers act through a variety of transcription factors that ensure their correct match with target promoters and consequent gene activation. There is a growing body of evidence on association of enhancers with transcription factors, co-activators, histone chromatin marks, and lncRNAs. Alterations in enhancers lead to misregulation of gene expression, causing a number of human diseases. In this review, we focus on the common characteristics of enhancers required for transcription stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Erokhin
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334 Russia
- LIA 1066, Laboratoire Franco-Russe de recherche en oncologie, 119334 Moscow, Russia
| | - Yegor Vassetzky
- LIA 1066, Laboratoire Franco-Russe de recherche en oncologie, 119334 Moscow, Russia
- UMR8126, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, Institut de cancérologie Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334 Russia
- LIA 1066, Laboratoire Franco-Russe de recherche en oncologie, 119334 Moscow, Russia
| | - Darya Chetverina
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334 Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Global transcriptome analysis and enhancer landscape of human primary T follicular helper and T effector lymphocytes. Blood 2014; 124:3719-29. [PMID: 25331115 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-06-582700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are a subset of CD4(+) T helper cells that migrate into germinal centers and promote B-cell maturation into memory B and plasma cells. Tfh cells are necessary for promotion of protective humoral immunity following pathogen challenge, but when aberrantly regulated, drive pathogenic antibody formation in autoimmunity and undergo neoplastic transformation in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and other primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Limited information is available on the expression and regulation of genes in human Tfh cells. Using a fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy, we obtained primary Tfh and non-Tfh T effector cells from tonsils and prepared genome-wide maps of active, intermediate, and poised enhancers determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing, with parallel transcriptome analyses determined by RNA sequencing. Tfh cell enhancers were enriched near genes highly expressed in lymphoid cells or involved in lymphoid cell function, with many mapping to sites previously associated with autoimmune disease in genome-wide association studies. A group of active enhancers unique to Tfh cells associated with differentially expressed genes was identified. Fragments from these regions directed expression in reporter gene assays. These data provide a significant resource for studies of T lymphocyte development and differentiation and normal and perturbed Tfh cell function.
Collapse
|
9
|
Adamik J, Wang KZQ, Unlu S, Su AJA, Tannahill GM, Galson DL, O’Neill LA, Auron PE. Distinct mechanisms for induction and tolerance regulate the immediate early genes encoding interleukin 1β and tumor necrosis factor α. PLoS One 2013; 8:e70622. [PMID: 23936458 PMCID: PMC3731334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Accepted: 06/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Interleukin-1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor α play related, but distinct, roles in immunity and disease. Our study revealed major mechanistic distinctions in the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling-dependent induction for the rapidly expressed genes (IL1B and TNF) coding for these two cytokines. Prior to induction, TNF exhibited pre-bound TATA Binding Protein (TBP) and paused RNA Polymerase II (Pol II), hallmarks of poised immediate-early (IE) genes. In contrast, unstimulated IL1B displayed very low levels of both TBP and paused Pol II, requiring the lineage-specific Spi-1/PU.1 (Spi1) transcription factor as an anchor for induction-dependent interaction with two TLR-activated transcription factors, C/EBPβ and NF-κB. Activation and DNA binding of these two pre-expressed factors resulted in de novo recruitment of TBP and Pol II to IL1B in concert with a permissive state for elongation mediated by the recruitment of elongation factor P-TEFb. This Spi1-dependent mechanism for IL1B transcription, which is unique for a rapidly-induced/poised IE gene, was more dependent upon P-TEFb than was the case for the TNF gene. Furthermore, the dependence on phosphoinositide 3-kinase for P-TEFb recruitment to IL1B paralleled a greater sensitivity to the metabolic state of the cell and a lower sensitivity to the phenomenon of endotoxin tolerance than was evident for TNF. Such differences in induction mechanisms argue against the prevailing paradigm that all IE genes possess paused Pol II and may further delineate the specific roles played by each of these rapidly expressed immune modulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juraj Adamik
- Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kent Z. Q. Wang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sebnem Unlu
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - An-Jey A. Su
- Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | | | - Deborah L. Galson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Luke A. O’Neill
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Philip E. Auron
- Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sumoylation at chromatin governs coordinated repression of a transcriptional program essential for cell growth and proliferation. Genome Res 2013; 23:1563-79. [PMID: 23893515 PMCID: PMC3787255 DOI: 10.1101/gr.154872.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite numerous studies on specific sumoylated transcriptional regulators, the global role of SUMO on chromatin in relation to transcription regulation remains largely unknown. Here, we determined the genome-wide localization of SUMO1 and SUMO2/3, as well as of UBC9 (encoded by UBE2I) and PIASY (encoded by PIAS4), two markers for active sumoylation, along with Pol II and histone marks in proliferating versus senescent human fibroblasts together with gene expression profiling. We found that, whereas SUMO alone is widely distributed over the genome with strong association at active promoters, active sumoylation occurs most prominently at promoters of histone and protein biogenesis genes, as well as Pol I rRNAs and Pol III tRNAs. Remarkably, these four classes of genes are up-regulated by inhibition of sumoylation, indicating that SUMO normally acts to restrain their expression. In line with this finding, sumoylation-deficient cells show an increase in both cell size and global protein levels. Strikingly, we found that in senescent cells, the SUMO machinery is selectively retained at histone and tRNA gene clusters, whereas it is massively released from all other unique chromatin regions. These data, which reveal the highly dynamic nature of the SUMO landscape, suggest that maintenance of a repressive environment at histone and tRNA loci is a hallmark of the senescent state. The approach taken in our study thus permitted the identification of a common biological output and uncovered hitherto unknown functions for active sumoylation at chromatin as a key mechanism that, in dynamically marking chromatin by a simple modifier, orchestrates concerted transcriptional regulation of a network of genes essential for cell growth and proliferation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Su MY, Steiner LA, Bogardus H, Mishra T, Schulz VP, Hardison RC, Gallagher PG. Identification of biologically relevant enhancers in human erythroid cells. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:8433-8444. [PMID: 23341446 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.413260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Identification of cell type-specific enhancers is important for understanding the regulation of programs controlling cellular development and differentiation. Enhancers are typically marked by the co-transcriptional activator protein p300 or by groups of cell-expressed transcription factors. We hypothesized that a unique set of enhancers regulates gene expression in human erythroid cells, a highly specialized cell type evolved to provide adequate amounts of oxygen throughout the body. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel sequencing, genome-wide maps of candidate enhancers were constructed for p300 and four transcription factors, GATA1, NF-E2, KLF1, and SCL, using primary human erythroid cells. These data were combined with gene expression analyses, and candidate enhancers were identified. Consistent with their predicted function as candidate enhancers, there was statistically significant enrichment of p300 and combinations of co-localizing erythroid transcription factors within 1-50 kb of the transcriptional start site (TSS) of genes highly expressed in erythroid cells. Candidate enhancers were also enriched near genes with known erythroid cell function or phenotype. Candidate enhancers exhibited moderate conservation with mouse and minimal conservation with nonplacental vertebrates. Candidate enhancers were mapped to a set of erythroid-associated, biologically relevant, SNPs from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) catalogue of NHGRI, National Institutes of Health. Fourteen candidate enhancers, representing 10 genetic loci, mapped to sites associated with biologically relevant erythroid traits. Fragments from these loci directed statistically significant expression in reporter gene assays. Identification of enhancers in human erythroid cells will allow a better understanding of erythroid cell development, differentiation, structure, and function and provide insights into inherited and acquired hematologic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mack Y Su
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Laurie A Steiner
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642
| | - Hannah Bogardus
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Tejaswini Mishra
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
| | - Vincent P Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Ross C Hardison
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
| | - Patrick G Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; Departments of Pathology and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
CTCF regulates Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency transcription by nucleosome displacement and RNA polymerase programming. J Virol 2012. [PMID: 23192870 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02283-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) has been implicated in various aspects of viral and host chromatin organization and transcriptional control. We showed previously that CTCF binds to a cluster of three sites in the first intron of the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) multicistronic latency-associated transcript that encodes latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA), viral cyclin (vCyclin), vFLIP, viral microRNAs, and kaposin. We show here that these CTCF binding sites regulate mRNA production, RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) programming, and nucleosome organization of the KSHV latency transcript control region. We also show that KSHV bacmids lacking these CTCF binding sites have elevated and altered ratios of spliced latency transcripts. CTCF binding site mutations altered RNAPII and RNAPII-accessory factor interactions with the latency control region. CTCF binding sites were required for the in vitro recruitment of RNAPII to the latency control region, suggesting that direct interactions between CTCF and RNAPII contribute to transcription regulation. Histone modifications in the latency control region were also altered by mutations in the CTCF binding sites. Finally, we show that CTCF binding alters the regular phasing of nucleosomes in the latency gene transcript and intron, suggesting that nucleosome positioning can be an underlying biochemical mechanism of CTCF function. We propose that RNAPII interactions and nucleosome displacement serve as a biochemical basis for programming RNAPII in the KSHV transcriptional control region.
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu L, Zhang Y, Feng J, Zheng N, Yin J, Zhang Y. GeSICA: genome segmentation from intra-chromosomal associations. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:164. [PMID: 22559164 PMCID: PMC3460730 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2011] [Accepted: 05/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Various aspects of genome organization have been explored based on data from distinct technologies, including histone modification ChIP-Seq, 3C, and its derivatives. Recently developed Hi-C techniques enable the genome wide mapping of DNA interactomes, thereby providing the opportunity to study genome organization in detail, but these methods also pose challenges in methodology development. Results We developed Genome Segmentation from Intra Chromosomal Associations, or GeSICA, to explore genome organization and applied the method to Hi-C data in human GM06990 and K562 cells. GeSICA calculates a simple logged ratio to efficiently segment the human genome into regions with two distinct states that correspond to rich and poor functional element states. Inside the rich regions, Markov Clustering was subsequently applied to segregate the regions into more detailed clusters. The binding sites of the insulator, cohesion, and transcription complexes are enriched in the boundaries between neighboring clusters, indicating that inferred clusters may have fine organizational features. Conclusions Our study presents a novel analysis method, known as GeSICA, which gives insight into genome organization based on Hi-C data. GeSICA is open source and freely available at: http://web.tongji.edu.cn/~zhanglab/GeSICA/
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Liu
- Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deng B, Melnik S, Cook PR. Transcription factories, chromatin loops, and the dysregulation of gene expression in malignancy. Semin Cancer Biol 2012; 23:65-71. [PMID: 22285981 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2011] [Accepted: 01/03/2012] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Pathologists recognize and classify cancers according to nuclear morphology, but there remains little scientific explanation of why malignant nuclei possess their characteristic features, or how those features are related to dysregulated function. This essay will discuss a basic structure-function axis that connects one central architectural motif in the nucleus-the chromatin loop-to the vital nuclear function of transcription. The loop is attached to a "transcription factory" through components of the transcription machinery (either polymerases or transcriptional activators/repressors), and the position of a gene within a loop determines how often that gene is transcribed. Then, dysregulated transcription is tightly coupled to alterations in structure, and vice versa. We also speculate on how the experimental approaches being used to analyze loops and factories might be applied to study the problems of tumour initiation and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binwei Deng
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Erokhin M, Davydova A, Kyrchanova O, Parshikov A, Georgiev P, Chetverina D. Insulators form gene loops by interacting with promoters in Drosophila. Development 2011; 138:4097-106. [PMID: 21862564 DOI: 10.1242/dev.062836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin insulators are regulatory elements involved in the modulation of enhancer-promoter communication. The 1A2 and Wari insulators are located immediately downstream of the Drosophila yellow and white genes, respectively. Using an assay based on the yeast GAL4 activator, we have found that both insulators are able to interact with their target promoters in transgenic lines, forming gene loops. The existence of an insulator-promoter loop is confirmed by the fact that insulator proteins could be detected on the promoter only in the presence of an insulator in the transgene. The upstream promoter regions, which are required for long-distance stimulation by enhancers, are not essential for promoter-insulator interactions. Both insulators support basal activity of the yellow and white promoters in eyes. Thus, the ability of insulators to interact with promoters might play an important role in the regulation of basal gene transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Erokhin
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St, Moscow, 119334 Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li J, Gilmour DS. Promoter proximal pausing and the control of gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:231-5. [PMID: 21324670 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2010] [Accepted: 01/18/2011] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The advent of methods for mapping the location of specific proteins across genomes is substantially enlightening our understanding of gene regulation. One recent discovery is that Pol II is concentrated at the 5' end of thousands of genes in mammalian and Drosophila cells. Before this, much research had focused on understanding how sequence-specific, DNA-binding proteins orchestrate the actions of regulators of chromatin structure and the general transcriptional machinery to control transcription initiation. The concentration of Pol II at the 5' ends of genes indicates that key steps regulating transcription occur after Pol II has associated with a gene's promoter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Li
- Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chromosomal organization at the level of gene complexes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 68:977-90. [PMID: 21080026 PMCID: PMC3043239 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-010-0585-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2010] [Revised: 10/17/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Metazoan genomes primarily consist of non-coding DNA in comparison to coding regions. Non-coding fraction of the genome contains cis-regulatory elements, which ensure that the genetic code is read properly at the right time and space during development. Regulatory elements and their target genes define functional landscapes within the genome, and some developmentally important genes evolve by keeping the genes involved in specification of common organs/tissues in clusters and are termed gene complex. The clustering of genes involved in a common function may help in robust spatio-temporal gene expression. Gene complexes are often found to be evolutionarily conserved, and the classic example is the hox complex. The evolutionary constraints seen among gene complexes provide an ideal model system to understand cis and trans-regulation of gene function. This review will discuss the various characteristics of gene regulatory modules found within gene complexes and how they can be characterized.
Collapse
|
18
|
Fujita T, Schlegel W. Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: an opportunity to regulate gene transcription. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2010; 30:31-42. [PMID: 20170405 DOI: 10.3109/10799890903517921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Transcription of eukaryotic genes by RNA polymerase II (pol II) is a complex, highly regulated multiphasic process. Pol II pauses in the proximity of the promoter on a large fraction of transcribed genes. Transcription initiation and elongation of transcripts are under distinct control. Induced gene expression can thus be due to enhanced initiation and/or stimulated elongation. Pausing and resumption of the elongation of transcripts is under the control of transcription elongation factors. Three of them, P-TEFb, DSIF, and NELF have been well characterized as protein complexes with multiple general but also gene specific functions. Elongation factors execute checkpoint functions but serve also as targets for signaling processes which regulate gene expression. Due to the general importance of transcription elongation factors, it is difficult to delineate the mechanisms by which elongation of specific genes is regulated by specific intracellular signals. However, it is clear that the controlled pausing of pol II provides an opportunity to finely control timing and quantity of transcriptional output.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gan Q, Schones DE, Ho Eun S, Wei G, Cui K, Zhao K, Chen X. Monovalent and unpoised status of most genes in undifferentiated cell-enriched Drosophila testis. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R42. [PMID: 20398323 PMCID: PMC2884545 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-r42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2009] [Revised: 02/26/2010] [Accepted: 04/15/2010] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing evidence demonstrates that stem cells maintain their identities by a unique transcription network and chromatin structure. Opposing epigenetic modifications H3K27 me3 and H3K4 me3 have been proposed to label differentiation-associated genes in stem cells, progenitor and precursor cells. In addition, many differentiation-associated genes are maintained at a poised status by recruitment of the initiative RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) at their promoter regions, in preparation for lineage-specific expression upon differentiation. Previous studies have been performed using cultured mammalian embryonic stem cells. To a lesser extent, chromatin structure has been delineated in other model organisms, such as Drosophila, to open new avenues for genetic analyses. RESULTS Here we use testes isolated from a Drosophila bag of marbles mutant strain, from which germ cells are in their undifferentiated status. We use these testes to study the endogenous chromatin structure of undifferentiated cells using ChIP-seq. We integrate the ChIP-seq with RNA-seq data, which measures the digital transcriptome. Our genome-wide analyses indicate that most differentiation-associated genes in undifferentiated cells lack an active chromatin mark and initiative Pol II; instead, they are associated with either the repressive H3K27 me3 mark or no detectable mark. CONCLUSIONS Our results reveal that most of the differentiation-associated genes in undifferentiated-cell-enriched Drosophila testes are associated with monovalent but not bivalent modifications, a chromatin signature that is distinct from the data reported in mammalian stem or precursor cells, which may reflect cell type specificity, species specificity, or both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Gan
- Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|