Dissection of progesterone receptor-mediated chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation in vivo

Environmental Factors Involved in Maternal Morbidity and Mortality

Nongenetic, environmental factors contribute to maternal morbidity and mortality through chemical exposures via air, water, soil, food, and consumer products. Pregnancy represents a particularly sensitive window of susceptibility during which physiological changes to every major organ system increase sensitivity to chemicals that can impact a woman's long-term health. Nonchemical stressors, such as low socioeconomic status, may exacerbate the effects of chemical exposures on maternal health. Racial/ethnic minorities are exposed disproportionately to both chemicals and nonchemical stressors, which likely contribute to the observed health disparities for maternal morbidities and mortality. Epidemiological studies linking exposures to adverse maternal health outcomes underscore the importance of environmental health impacts, and mechanistic studies in model systems reveal how chemicals perturb biological pathways and processes. Environmental stressors are associated with a variety of immediate maternal health impacts, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, fibroids, and infertility, as well as long-term maternal health impacts, such as higher risk of breast cancer and metabolic disorders. Identifying and reducing a pregnant woman's environmental exposures is not only beneficial to her offspring but also important to preserve her short- and long-term health.

Differential glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transcription mechanisms

Nuclear receptors such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that mediate transcription of target genes by recruiting factors that modulate chromatin structure. In this study, curcumin, a compound known to inhibit GR-mediated transcription, was used to examine the different mechanisms by which GR regulates transcription. The mechanisms of transcription regulation of metallothioneine-2A (MT2A) and solute carrier family 19 member 2 (SLC19A2), two GR target genes where the hormone-dependent gene activation is inhibited or unaffected by curcumin treatment, respectively, were analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation and RT-PCR experiments. The data suggest that the loss of hormone-dependent MT2A gene expression is due to the inhibition of continued transcription activity after initial assembly of the transcription machinery. In contrast, the hormone-dependent SLC19A2 gene expression is maintained because the continued transcription output after assembly of transcription machinery is unaffected by curcumin. These results suggest that the two GR target genes use alternate mechanisms to regulate expression levels at the level of continued transcription output after transcription machinery assembly.

Ligand-specific dynamics of the androgen receptor at its response element in living cells

Androgens have key roles in normal physiology and in male sexual differentiation as well as in pathological conditions such as prostate cancer. Androgens act through the androgen receptor (AR), which is a ligand-modulated transcription factor. Antiandrogens block AR function and are widely used in disease states, but little is known about their mechanism of action in vivo. Here, we describe a rapid differential interaction of AR with target genomic sites in living cells in the presence of agonists which coincides with the recruitment of BRM ATPase complex and chromatin remodeling, resulting in transcriptional activation. In contrast, the interaction of antagonist-bound or mutant AR with its target was found to be kinetically different: it was dramatically faster, occurred without chromatin remodeling, and resulted in the lack of transcriptional inhibition. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer analysis of wild-type AR and a transcriptionally compromised mutant at the hormone response element showed that intramolecular interactions between the N and C termini of AR play a key functional role in vivo compared to intermolecular interactions between two neighboring ARs. These data provide a kinetic and mechanistic basis for regulation of gene expression by androgens and antiandrogens in living cells.

Ligand-specific dynamics of the progesterone receptor in living cells and during chromatin remodeling in vitro

Progesterone receptor (PR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is a key regulator of several processes in reproductive function. We have studied the dynamics of the interaction of PR with a natural target promoter in living cells through the use of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis and also have characterized the dynamics of the interaction of PR with the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter reconstituted into chromatin in vitro. In photobleaching experiments, PR in the presence of the agonist R5020 exhibits rapid exchange with the MMTV promoter in living cells. Two PR antagonists, RU486 and ZK98299, have opposite effects on receptor dynamics in vivo. In the presence of RU486, PR binds to the promoter and is exchanged more slowly than the agonist-activated receptor. In contrast, PR bound to ZK98299 is not localized to the promoter and exhibits higher mobility in the nucleoplasm than the agonist-bound receptor. Significantly, PR bound to R5020 or RU486 can recruit the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex to the promoter, but PR activated with ZK98299 cannot. Furthermore, we found ligand-specific active displacement of PR from the MMTV promoter during chromatin remodeling in vitro and conclude that the interaction of PR with chromatin is highly dynamic both in vivo and in vitro. We propose that factor displacement during chromatin remodeling is an important component of receptor mobility and that ligand-specific interactions with remodeling complexes can strongly influence receptor nuclear dynamics and rates of exchange with chromatin in living cells.

Nuclear factor 1 is required for both hormone-dependent chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter has been used as a model to study how the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) remodels chromatin to allow other transcription factors to bind and activate transcription. To dissect the precise role of nuclear factor 1 (NF1) in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation, we used linker-scanning mutants of transcription factor binding sites on the MMTV promoter. We compared the NF1 mutant MMTV promoter in the context of transiently transfected templates (transient transfection) and templates organized as chromatin (stable transfection) to understand the effect of chromatin on factor binding and transcription. We show that on a transiently transfected template, mutation in the NF1 binding site reduces both basal and hormone-dependent transcription. This suggests that NF1 is required for transcription in the absence of organized chromatin. We also found that binding of NF1 on a transiently transfected template is independent of mutation in hormone response elements or the octamer transcription factor (OTF) binding site. In contrast, the binding of OTF proteins to a transiently transfected template was found to be dependent on the binding of NF1, which may imply that NF1 has a stabilizing effect on OTF binding. On a chromatin template, mutation in the NF1 binding site does not affect the positioning of nucleosomes on the promoter. We also show that in the absence of NF1 binding, GR-mediated chromatin remodeling of nucleosome B is reduced and hormone-dependent activation of transcription is abolished. Further, we demonstrate that NF1 is required for both the association of BRG1 chromatin remodeling complex and the GR on the promoter in vivo. These results suggest the novel possibility that NF1 may participate in chromatin remodeling activities in addition to directly enhancing transcription and that in the absence of its binding site the GR is unable to effectively bind the promoter and recruit the remodeling complex.

Loss of androgen receptor transcriptional activity at the G(1)/S transition

Androgens are essential for the differentiation, growth, and maintenance of male-specific organs. The effects of androgens in cells are mediated by the androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors. Recently, transient transfection studies have shown that overexpression of cell cycle regulatory proteins affects the transcriptional activity of the AR. In this report, we characterize the transcriptional activity of endogenous AR through the cell cycle. We demonstrate that in G0, AR enhances transcription from an integrated steroid-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and also from an integrated androgen-specific probasin promoter. This activity is strongly reduced or abolished at the G(1)/S boundary. In S phase, the receptor regains activity, indicating that there is a transient regulatory event that inactivates the AR at the G(1)/S transition. This regulation is specific for the AR, since the related glucocorticoid receptor is transcriptionally active at the G(1)/S boundary. Not all of the effects of androgens are blocked, however, since androgens retain the ability to increase AR protein levels. The transcriptional inactivity of the AR at the G(1)/S junction coincides with a decrease in AR protein level, although activity can be partly rescued without an increase in receptor. Inhibition of histone deacetylases brings about this partial restoration of AR activity at the G(1)/S boundary, demonstrating the involvement of acetylation pathways in the cell cycle regulation of AR transcriptional activity. Finally, a model is proposed that explains the inactivity of the AR at the G(1)/S transition by integrating receptor levels, the action of cell cycle regulators, and the contribution of histone acetyltransferase-containing coactivators.

Transactivation specificity of glucocorticoid versus progesterone receptors. Role of functionally different interactions of transcription factors with amino- and carboxyl-terminal receptor domains

A major unanswered question of glucocorticoid and progesterone action is how different whole cell responses arise when both of the cognate receptors can bind to, and activate, the same hormone response elements. We have documented previously that the EC(50) of agonist complexes, and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, of both glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs) are modulated by increased amounts of homologous receptor and of coregulators. We now ask whether these components can differentially alter GR and PR transcriptional properties. To remove possible cell-specific differences, we have examined both receptors in the common environment of a line of mouse mammary adenocarcinoma (1470.2) cells. In order to segregate the responses that might be due to unequal nucleosome reorganization by the two receptors from those reflecting interactions with other components, we chose a transiently transfected reporter containing a simple glucocorticoid response element (i.e. GREtkLUC). No significant differences are found with elevated levels of either receptor. However, major, qualitative differences are seen with the corepressors SMRT and NCoR, which afford opposite responses with GR and PR. Studies with chimeric GR/PR receptors indicate that no one segment of PR or GR is responsible for these properties and that the composite response likely involves interactions with both the amino and carboxyl termini of receptors. Collectively, the data suggest that GR and PR induction of responsive genes in a given cell can be differentially controlled, in part, by unequal interactions of multiple receptor domains with assorted nuclear cofactors.

Hormone-induced nucleosome positioning in the MMTV promoter is reversible

The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter is induced by glucocorticoid hormone via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The hormone-triggered effects on MMTV transcription and chromatin structure were studied in Xenopus oocytes. We previously showed that the nucleosomes organizing the MMTV promoter became translationally positioned upon hormone induction. A single GR-binding site was necessary and sufficient for the chromatin events to occur, while transcription and basal promoter elements were dispensable. Here we show that addition of the hormone antagonists RU486 or RU43044 to the previously hormone-induced MMTV promoter results in cessation of transcription and loss of chromatin remodeling and nucleosome positioning. In vivo footprinting demonstrated agonist- and RU486-induced GR binding to its DNA response element (GRE), while the other antagonist, RU43044, did not promote GR-GRE interaction. These results demonstrate that induction and maintenance of nucleosome positioning is an active process that requires constant 'pressure' of agonist-GR-recruited chromatin-modifying factor(s) rather than GR-DNA binding itself.

Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated chromatin remodeling in vivo

The compaction of DNA into chromatin provides an additional level of gene regulation in eukaryotes that may not be available to prokaryotes. When packaged as chromatin, most promoters are transcriptionally repressed, and transcription factors have reduced access to their binding sites. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the activity of genes involved in many physiological processes. To regulate eukaryotic genes, the GR binds to target sites within promoter regions of genes assembled as chromatin. This interaction alters the nucleosomal architecture to allow binding of other transcription factors, and formation of the preinitiation complex. The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter has been used extensively as a model to explore the processes by which the GR remodels chromatin and activates transcription. Significant progress has been made in our understanding of the mechanisms used by the GR to modify chromatin structure, and the limits placed on the GR by post-translational modifications of histones. We will describe recent developments in the processes used by the GR to activate transcription in vivo via chromatin remodeling complexes, histone H1 phosphorylation, and recruitment of diverse coactivators.

Regulation of the estrogen-responsive pS2 gene in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

To understand how hormones and antihormones regulate transcription of estrogen-responsive genes, in vivo footprinting was used to examine the endogenous pS2 gene in MCF-7 cells. While the consensus pS2 estrogen response element (ERE) half site was protected in the absence of hormone, both the consensus and imperfect ERE half sites were protected in the presence of estrogen. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 182,780 elicited distinct footprinting patterns, which differed from those observed with vehicle- or with estrogen-treated cells suggesting that the partial agonist/antagonist and antagonist properties of 4-hydroxytamoxifen or ICI 182,780, respectively, may be partially explained by modulation of protein-DNA interactions. Footprinting patterns in and around the TATA and CAAT sequences were identical in the presence and in the absence of estrogen suggesting that the basal promoter is accessible and poised for transcription even in the absence of hormone. In vitro DNase I footprinting experiments demonstrated that the estrogen receptor bound to the pS2 ERE and that adjacent nucleotides were protected by MCF-7 nuclear proteins. These findings indicate that transcription of the pS2 gene is modulated by alterations in protein binding to multiple sites upstream of the basal promoter, but not by changes in protein-DNA interactions in the basal promoter.

Effects of antiandrogens on chromatin remodeling and transcription of the integrated mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

Inhibition of the ligand-activated androgen receptor (AR) by antiandrogens plays an important role in the treatment of various hyperandrogenic disorders including prostate cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms of antiandrogen activity in vivo remain unclear. In this study we analyzed the effects of cyproterone acetate (CPA), flutamide (F), and hydroxyflutamide (OHF) on transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the genomically integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. This promoter has provided an excellent model system to study the impact of steroid hormones on transcriptional activation in the context of a defined chromatin structure. The MMTV hormone response element is positioned on a phased nucleosome, which becomes remodeled in response to steroids. We utilized this model system in mouse L-cell fibroblasts that contain a stably integrated MMTV promoter. In these cells, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) induced a large increase of AR protein levels that correlated with transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter. Coadministration of DHT and CPA or DHT and OHF in these cells inhibited the increase of AR levels, which resulted in a strong blockage of transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter. In contrast, F had no significant influence on these activities. We conclude that a major portion of the antiandrogenic effects of CPA and OHF in vivo are mediated by the reduction of AR levels.

Characterization of transiently and constitutively expressed progesterone receptors: evidence for two functional states

Activated steroid receptors induce chromatin remodeling events in the promoters of some target genes. We previously reported that transiently expressed progesterone receptor (PR) cannot activate mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when it adopts the form of ordered chromatin. However, when expressed continuously, the PR acquires this ability. In this study we explored whether this gain of function occurs through alterations in nucleoprotein structure at the MMTV promoter or through changes in receptor status. We observed no major structural differences at the MMTV promoter in the presence of constitutively expressed PR and found its mechanism of activation to be very similar to that of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). However, a systematic comparison of the functional behavior of the transiently and constitutively expressed PR elucidated significant differences. The transiently expressed PR is activated in the absence of ligand by cAMP and by components in FBS and has significantly increased sensitivity to progestins. In contrast, the constitutively expressed PR is refractory to activation by cAMP and serum and has normal sensitivity to its ligand. In addition, while the PR is localized to the nucleus in both cases, a significant fraction of the transiently expressed PR is tightly bound to the nucleus even in the absence of ligand, while the majority of constitutively expressed PR is not. These results strongly suggest that the PR undergoes processing in the cell subsequent to its initial expression and that this processing is important for various aspects of its function, including its ability to productively interact with target genes that require chromatin remodeling for activation.

Selective activation of the glucocorticoid receptor by steroid antagonists in human breast cancer and osteosarcoma cells

Steroid hormones regulate the transcription of numerous genes via high affinity receptors that act in concert with chromatin remodeling complexes, coactivators and corepressors. We have compared the activities of a variety of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists in breast cancer and osteosarcoma cell lines engineered to stably maintain the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. In both cell types, GR activation by dexamethasone occurs via the disruption of mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin structure and the recruitment of receptor coactivator proteins. However, when challenged with a variety of antagonists the GR displays differential ability to activate transcription within the two cell types. For the breast cancer cells, the antagonists fail to activate the promoter and do not promote the association of the GR with either remodeling or coactivator proteins. In contrast, in osteosarcoma cells, the antiglucocorticoids, RU486 and RU43044, exhibit partial agonist activity. The capacity of these antagonists to stimulate transcription in the osteosarcoma cells is reflected in the ability of the RU486-bound receptor to remodel chromatin and associate with chromatin-remodeling proteins. Similarly, the observation that the RU486-bound receptor does not fully activate transcription is consistent with its inability to recruit receptor coactivator proteins.

Structural and functional cross-talk between a distant enhancer and the epsilon-globin gene promoter shows interdependence of the two elements in chromatin

We investigated the requirements for enhancer-promoter communication by using the human beta-globin locus control region (LCR) DNase I-hypersensitive site 2 (HS2) enhancer and the epsilon-globin gene in chromatinized minichromosomes in erythroid cells. Activation of globin genes during development is accompanied by localized alterations of chromatin structure, and CACCC binding factors and GATA-1, which interact with both globin promoters and the LCR, are believed to be critical for globin gene transcription activation. We found that an HS2 element mutated in its GATA motif failed to remodel the epsilon-globin promoter or activate transcription yet HS2 nuclease accessibility did not change. Accessibility and transcription were reduced at promoters with mutated GATA-1 or CACCC sites. Strikingly, these mutations also resulted in reduced accessibility at HS2. In the absence of a globin gene, HS2 is similarly resistant to nuclease digestion. In contrast to observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, HS2-dependent promoter remodeling was diminished when we mutated the TATA box, crippling transcription. This mutation also reduced HS2 accessibility. The results indicate that the epsilon-globin promoter and HS2 interact both structurally and functionally and that both upstream activators and the basal transcription apparatus contribute to the interaction. Further, at least in this instance, transcription activation and promoter remodeling by a distant enhancer are not separable.

Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) enhances ligand-dependent and receptor-dependent cell-free transcription of chromatin

Progesterone receptor (PR) functions as a transcription factor that modulates the transcription of target genes in response to progesterone and other signals. The transcriptional activity of PR requires the involvement of coactivators such as steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1). To dissect the role of SRC-1 in PR transactivation, we established an in vitro transcription system with chromatin templates, in which PR induced transcription in a ligand-dependent and PRE-dependent manner. In the presence of ligand, purified PR bound to chromatin templates, resulting in chromatin remodeling. With this system, the ability of purified SRC-1 to act as a coactivator of PR was examined. SRC-1 potentiated transcription by ligand-activated PR, whereas it had no effect on transcription in the absence of ligands. As SRC-1 possesses intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity, we tested the role of acetylation in PR-mediated transcription by using a histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA). We found that addition of TSA strongly enhanced PR-dependent transcription on chromatin but not on naked DNA template, and the effects of SRC-1 and TSA on PR transactivation were partially redundant. In addition, SRC-1 was able to potentiate PR transactivation with nonchromatin templates. Thus, our results substantiate a two-step mechanism whereby recruitment of coactivator SRC-1 by the ligand-activated PR in vivo leads to (i) chromatin remodeling through histone acetylation and (ii) recruitment/stabilization of the preinitiation complex.

Nuclear receptor coregulators: cellular and molecular biology

Nuclear receptor coregulators are coactivators or corepressors that are required by nuclear receptors for efficient transcripitonal regulation. In this context, we define coactivators, broadly, as molecules that interact with nuclear receptors and enhance their transactivation. Analogously, we refer to nuclear receptor corepressors as factors that interact with nuclear receptors and lower the transcription rate at their target genes. Most coregulators are, by definition, rate limiting for nuclear receptor activation and repression, but do not significantly alter basal transcription. Recent data have indicated multiple modes of action of coregulators, including direct interactions with basal transcription factors and covalent modification of histones and other proteins. Reflecting this functional diversity, many coregulators exist in distinct steady state precomplexes, which are thought to associate in promoter-specific configurations. In addition, these factors may function as molecular gates to enable integration of diverse signal transduction pathways at nuclear receptor-regulated promoters. This review will summarize selected aspects of our current knowledge of the cellular and molecular biology of nuclear receptor coregulators.

The structure of the nuclear hormone receptors

The functions of the group of proteins known as nuclear receptors will be understood fully only when their working three-dimensional structures are known. These ligand-activated transcription factors belong to the steroid-thyroid-retinoid receptor superfamily, which include the receptors for steroids, thyroid hormone, vitamins A- and D-derived hormones, and certain fatty acids. The majority of family members are homologous proteins for which no ligand has been identified (the orphan receptors). Molecular cloning and structure/function analyses have revealed that the members of the superfamily have a common functional domain structure. This includes a variable N-terminal domain, often important for transactivation of transcription; a well conserved DNA-binding domain, crucial for recognition of specific DNA sequences and protein:protein interactions; and at the C-terminal end, a ligand-binding domain, important for hormone binding, protein: protein interactions, and additional transactivation activity. Although the structure of some independently expressed single domains of a few of these receptors have been solved, no holoreceptor structure or structure of any two domains together is yet available. Thus, the three-dimensional structure of the DNA-binding domains of the glucocorticoid, estrogen, retinoic acid-beta, and retinoid X receptors, and of the ligand-binding domains of the thyroid, retinoic acid-gamma, retinoid X, estrogen, progesterone, and peroxisome proliferator activated-gamma receptors have been solved. The secondary structure of the glucocorticoid receptor N-terminal domain, in particular the taul transcription activation region, has also been studied. The structural studies available not only provide a beginning stereochemical knowledge of these receptors, but also a basis for understanding some of the topological details of the interaction of the receptor complexes with coactivators, corepressors, and other components of the transcriptional machinery. In this review, we summarize and discuss the current information on structures of the steroid-thyroid-retinoid receptors.

Direct visualization of the human estrogen receptor alpha reveals a role for ligand in the nuclear distribution of the receptor

The human estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) has been tagged at its amino terminus with the S65T variant of the green fluorescent protein (GFP), allowing subcellular trafficking and localization to be observed in living cells by fluorescence microscopy. The tagged receptor, GFP-ER, is functional as a ligand-dependent transcription factor, responds to both agonist and antagonist ligands, and can associate with the nuclear matrix. Its cellular localization was analyzed in four human breast cancer epithelial cell lines, two ER+ (MCF7 and T47D) and two ER- (MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435A), under a variety of ligand conditions. In all cell lines, GFP-ER is observed only in the nucleus in the absence of ligand. Upon the addition of agonist or antagonist ligand, a dramatic redistribution of GFP-ER from a reticular to punctate pattern occurs within the nucleus. In addition, the full antagonist ICI 182780 alters the nucleocytoplasmic compartmentalization of the receptor and causes partial accumulation in the cytoplasm in a process requiring continued protein synthesis. GFP-ER localization varies between cells, despite being cultured and treated in a similar manner. Analysis of the nuclear fluorescence intensity for variation in its frequency distribution helped establish localization patterns characteristic of cell line and ligand. During the course of this study, localization of GFP-ER to the nucleolar region is observed for ER- but not ER+ human breast cancer epithelial cell lines. Finally, our work provides a visual description of the "unoccupied" and ligand-bound receptor and is discussed in the context of the role of ligand in modulating receptor activity.

Intranuclear trafficking and gene targeting by members of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily

Upon binding to regulatory elements in mammalian chromosomes, steroid receptors induce specific transitions in the nucleoprotein structure of the template. These transitions reflect, in part, the reorganization of chromatin structure to permit interaction of secondary factors with target sequences in promoter regulatory regions. Steroid receptors represent a class of transcriptional activators that are able to interact with repressed nucleoprotein templates and recruit necessary activities for chromatin remodeling. The ligand-induced movement of nuclear receptors from inactive states, either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus, to productive interactions with chromatin is complex and likely reflects the interaction with multiple protein complexes and subcellular structures. Regulation of gene expression by nuclear receptors is thus mediated through the subcellular distribution of inactive receptors, the redistribution of activated receptor complexes to appropriate nuclear domains, the reorganization of chromatin structures for interaction with soluble components of the nucleoplasm, and direct protein-protein contacts between receptors and the basal transcription apparatus.

Identification of glucocorticoid receptor domains necessary for transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter integrated in the genome

It has previously been determined that the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when integrated in the genome assumes a defined chromatin structure which is disrupted upon addition of glucocorticoids. In contrast, a transiently introduced MMTV promoter has a random nucleoprotein structure. To reveal glucocorticoid receptor (GR) domains necessary for transcriptional activation of the MMTV promoter we compared the effects of mutations of the GR on transcriptional activation of the stably integrated versus transiently introduced MMTV promoter. For this purpose we generated a GR-negative cell line which has an MMTV promoter/reporter construct integrated in the genome and studied the transcriptional activation of this construct by different GR mutants introduced into the cells. Transcriptional activation of the integrated and transiently introduced promoter was achieved by the wild-type GR or a chimeric receptor in which the MR hormone-binding domain (HBD) replaced the GR HBD. In contrast, we found that deletion of the HBD of the GR or replacement of this region with the equivalent domain of the estrogen receptor produced receptors that were unable to activate the MMTV promoter integrated in the genome although these receptors efficiently activated the transiently introduced MMTV promoter. The HBD was not the sole determinant of MMTV transcriptional activation when integrated in the genome. Chimeric receptors which harbored the MR amino terminal domain or the wild-type MR were also unable to activate the integrated MMTV promoter. Taken together, these data indicate a rigid requirement for sequences in both the GR amino and the carboxy terminal domains for transcriptional activation of a hormone response element in the defined chromatin context of the MMTV promoter.

p300 and estrogen receptor cooperatively activate transcription via differential enhancement of initiation and reinitiation

Estrogen- and antiestrogen-regulated, AF-2-dependent transcriptional activation by purified full-length human estrogen receptor (ER) was carried out with chromatin templates in vitro. With this system, the ability of purified human p300 to function as a transcriptional coactivator was examined. In the absence of ligand-activated ER, p300 was found to have little effect (less than twofold increase) on transcription, whereas, in contrast, p300 was observed to act synergistically with ligand-activated ER to enhance transcription. When transcription was limited to a single round, p300 and ER were found to enhance the efficiency of transcription initiation in a cooperative manner. On the other hand, when transcription reinitiation was allowed to occur, ER, but not p300, was able to increase the number of rounds of transcription. These results suggest a two-stroke mechanism for transcriptional activation by ligand-activated ER and p300. In the first stroke, ER and p300 function cooperatively to increase the efficiency of productive transcription initiation. In the second stroke, ER promotes the reassembly of the transcription preinitiation complex. Therefore, ER exhibits distinct, dual functions in transcription initiation and reinitiation.

Ligand-inducible retinoid X receptor-mediated protein: DNA interactions in the retinoic acid receptor beta2 gene promoter in vivo

Retinoid X receptors (RXRs) are recently characterized transcription factors that are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. However, it is not known whether the endogenous RXR complex requires its ligand for access to its hormone response element (HRE) of a target gene in vivo. Hence, dimethyl sulfate-based genomic footprinting was carried out to examine occupancy of HREs in the retinoic acid (RA) receptor beta2 (RARbeta2) gene promoter in the murine melanoma cell line S91 cultured in the absence or presence of T3, all-trans-RA (atRA), or CD2624, an RXR-selective retinoid. No footprint was observed at the RA-response element (betaRARE) in the absence of ligands. However, a footprint was detected at the betaRARE and other cis-acting elements after a 6 h incubation with CD2624 and atRA. Interestingly, only the betaRARE was footprinted after 60 min incubation with CD2624. These results suggest that the endogenous RXR complex can interact with an HRE of a target gene in the presence of ligand, and subsequently may initiate additional interactions between DNA and other transcription factors.

Histone acetyltransferases regulate HIV-1 enhancer activity in vitro

Specific inhibitors of histone deacetylase, such as trichostatin A (TSA) and trapoxin (TPX), are potent inducers of HIV-1 transcription in latently infected T-cell lines. Activation of the integrated HIV-1 promoter is accompanied by the loss or rearrangement of a positioned nucleosome (nuc-1) near the viral RNA start site. Here we show that TSA strongly induces HIV-1 transcription on chromatin in vitro, concomitant with an enhancer factor-assisted increase in the level of acetylated histone H4. TSA treatment, however, did not detectably alter enhancer factor binding or the positioning of nuc-1 on the majority of the chromatin templates indicating that protein acetylation and chromatin remodeling may be limiting steps that occur only on transcriptionally competent templates, or that remodeling of nuc-1 requires additional factors. To assess the number of active chromatin templates in vitro, transcription was limited to a single round with low levels of the detergent Sarkosyl. Remarkably, HIV-1 transcription on chromatin was found to arise from a small number of active templates that can each support nearly 100 rounds of transcription, and TSA increased the number of active templates in each round. In contrast, transcription on naked DNA was limited to only a few rounds and was not responsive to TSA. We conclude that HIV-1 enhancer complexes greatly facilitate transcription reinitiation on chromatin in vitro, and act at a limiting step to promote the acetylation of histones or other transcription factors required for HIV-1 enhancer activity.

Disruption of downstream chromatin directed by a transcriptional activator

Promoter-proximal pausing during transcriptional elongation is an important way of regulating many diverse loci, including the human hsp70 gene. Pausing of RNA polymerase can be enhanced by chromatin structure. We demonstrate that activation of hsp70 leads to disruption of transcribed chromatin in front of RNA polymerase. In vivo, disruption of chromatin in the first 400 bp of the transcribed region of hsp70 following heat shock is resistant to the transcriptional inhibitor alpha-amanitin. Disruption of chromatin farther downstream also occurs following activation but is sensitive to alpha-amanitin, suggesting that polymerase movement is needed to disrupt distal portions of the hsp70 gene. In vitro, disruption of transcribed chromatin is dependent on the presence of the human heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) activation domains. These experiments demonstrate that HSF1 can direct disruption of chromatin in transcribed regions. We suggest that this is one of the mechanisms used by HSF1 to facilitate transcriptional elongation.

Retinoid-induced chromatin structure alterations in the retinoic acid receptor beta2 promoter

Transcription of the retinoic acid receptor beta2 (RARbeta2) gene is induced by retinoic acid (RA) in mouse P19 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells. Here we studied RA-induced chromatin structure alterations in the endogenous RARbeta2 promoter and in an integrated, multicopy RARbeta2 promoter in EC cells. RA markedly increased restriction site accessibility within the promoter, including a site near the RA responsive element (RARE) to which the nuclear receptor retinoid X receptor (RXR)-RAR heterodimer binds. These changes coincided with RA-induced alterations in the DNase I hypersensitivity pattern in and around the promoter. These changes became undetectable upon removal of RA, which coincided with the extinction of transcription. Analyses with receptor-selective ligands and an antagonist showed that increase in restriction site accessibility correlates with transcriptional activation, which parallels the RA-induced in vivo footprint of the promoter. Despite these changes, the micrococcal nuclease digestion profile of this promoter was not altered by RA. These results indicate that concurrent with the binding of the RXR-RAR heterodimer to the RARE, the local chromatin structure undergoes dynamic, reversible changes in and around the promoter without globally affecting the nucleosomal organization.

Nucleosomal structures of c-myc promoters with transcriptionally engaged RNA polymerase II

Organization of DNA into chromatin has been shown to contribute to a repressed state of gene transcription. Disruption of nucleosomal structure is observed in response to gene induction, suggesting a model in which RNA polymerase II (pol II) is recruited to the promoter upon reorganization of nucleosomes. Here we show that induction of c-myc transcription correlates with the disruption of two nucleosomes in the upstream promoter region. This nucleosomal disruption, however, is not necessary for the binding of pol II to the promoter. Transcriptionally engaged pol II complexes can be detected when the upstream chromatin is in a more closed configuration. Thus, upstream chromatin opening is suggested to affect activation of promoter-bound pol II rather than entry of polymerases into the promoter. Interestingly, pol II complexes are detectable in both sense and antisense transcriptional directions, but only complexes in the sense direction respond to activation signals resulting in processive transcription.

Identification of a functional imperfect estrogen-responsive element in the 5'-promoter region of the human cathepsin D gene

17beta-Estradiol (E2) induces cathepsin D gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Previous studies have identified an Sp1-imperfect estrogen-responsive element (ERE) half-site [GGGCGG(N)23ACGGG] (-199 to -165) in the promoter region which forms an Sp1-estrogen receptor (ER) complex and confers E2 responsiveness on the corresponding Sp1-ERE-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) construct. Further analysis of downstream regions of the promoter identified a CGCCC(N)3TGACC sequence (-119 to -107) which is homologous to the adenovirus major late promoter element (MLPE) and binds the ER to form a retarded band in a gel electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The corresponding promoter-CAT construct is also E2-inducible. The MLPE resembles an imperfect palindromic ERE containing imperfect (5') and perfect (3') ERE half-sites; analysis of oligonucleotides with mutations in these half-sites shows that only the perfect ERE half-site is required for binding the ER, whereas both sites are required for transactivation. In vivo exonuclease III footprinting showed that treatment with E2 also enhanced binding at the MLPE site. Identification of this second functional enhancer sequence in the 5'-promoter region of cathepsin D is consistent with the increasingly complex cell-specific regulation of hormone-responsive genes.

In vivo protein-DNA interactions on a glucocorticoid response unit of a liver-specific gene: hormone-induced transcription factor binding to constitutively open chromatin

Transcription from the liver promoter of a 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFK-2) gene depends on the presence of glucocorticoids that act via a glucocorticoid response unit (GRU) located in the first intron. The promoter and the GRU are in a constitutively open chromatin configuration. To determine how glucocorticoids would affect factor binding to the GRU in absence of chromatin remodeling, we have used a combination of in vitro DNA-binding assays and in vivo genomic footprinting in rat hepatocytes and hepatoma cells. We found that, in the absence of glucocorticoids, the GRU binds nuclear factor-I (NF-I). Glucocorticoid treatment modified factor binding to the NF-I site and induced the binding of hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 (HNF-3). Transfection assays showed that HNF-3 cooperates with the glucocorticoid receptor in stimulating transcription. In contrast with the lack of effect of glucocorticoids on factor binding to constitutively open GRUs of other genes, HNF-3 binding to the open PFK-2 GRU was hormone-dependent. Therefore, the PFK-2 GRU behaves as a novel type of GRU.

How hormone receptor-DNA binding affects nucleosomal DNA: the role of symmetry

Molecular dynamics simulations have been employed to determine the optimal conformation of an estrogen receptor DNA binding domain dimer bound to a consensus response element, ds(AGGTCACAGTGACCT), and to a nonconsensus response element, ds(AGAACACAGTGACCT). The structures simulated were derived from a crystallographic structure and solvated by a sphere (45-A radius) of explicit water and counterions. Long-range electrostatic interactions were accounted for during 100-ps simulations by means of a fast multipole expansion algorithm combined with a multiple time-step scheme in the molecular dynamics package NAMD. The simulations demonstrate that the dimer induces a bent and underwound (10.7 bp/turn) conformation in the DNA. The bending reflects the dyad symmetry of the receptor dimer and can be described as an S-shaped curve in the helical axis of DNA when projected onto a plane. A similar bent and underwound conformation is observed for nucleosomal DNA near the nucleosome's dyad axis that reflects the symmetry of the histone octamer. We propose that when a receptor dimer binds to a nucleosome, the most favorable dimer-DNA and histone-DNA interactions are achieved if the respective symmetry axes are aligned. Such positioning of a receptor dimer over the dyad of nucleosome B in the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter is in agreement with experiment.

RU486 (mifepristone): mechanisms of action and clinical uses

RU486 (mifepristone) has proved to be a remarkably active antiprogesterone and antiglucocorticosteroid agent in human beings. The mechanism of action involves the intracellular receptors of the antagonized hormones (progesterone and glucocorticosteroids). At the molecular level, the most important features are high binding affinity to the receptor, interaction of the phenylaminodimethyl group in the 11 beta-position with a specific region of the receptor binding pocket, and RU486-induced transconformation differences in the ligand-binding domain. These particularities have consequences at different steps of the receptor function as compared with agonists. However, the reasoning cannot be limited to the RU486-receptor interaction, and, for instance, there is the possibility of a switch from antagonistic property to agonist activity, depending on the intervention of other signaling pathways. It would be desirable to have derivatives with only one of the two antagonistic properties (antiprogestin, antiglucocorticosteroid) in spite of similarities between steroid structures, receptors involved, and responsive machineries in target cells. Clinically, the RU486-plus-prostaglandin method is ready to be used on a large scale and is close to being as convenient and safe as any medical method of abortion may be. The early use of RU486 as a contragestive as soon as a woman fears a pregnancy she does not want will help to defuse the abortion issue. Research should now be conducted to define an efficient and convenient contraceptive method with RU486 or other antiprogestins. The usefulness of RU486 for obstetric indications, including facilitation of difficult delivery, has to be assessed rapidly. Gynecologic trials, particularly in leiomyomata, should be systemically continued. The very preliminary results obtained with tumors, including breast cancers, indicate that further studies are necessary.

An upstream activator of transcription coordinately increases the level and epigenetic stability of gene expression

The mouse metallothionein-I (mMT-I) promoter is activated by the metal response element-binding transcription factor (MTF), which binds metal response elements (MREs) when stimulated with heavy metals. We analyzed eight K562 erythroleukemia cell clones, each carrying a single integrated copy of an mMT-I/beta-geo construct, using a system that can independently assess the level of beta-geo expression and the rate at which it is silenced. In these clones, basal expression and rate of silencing vary widely and independently with integration site. This implies that the rates of transcription and of silencing are separate properties determined by interaction of the regulatory elements of the transgene with the site of integration. Induction of the mMT-I promoter with zinc both increases expression level and strongly retards silencing of beta-geo expression. At a given integration site, expression level and silencing are affected coordinately by induction. Taken together with earlier studies of distant metal-responsive elements, these results suggest that distance from the promoter may determine whether a factor can increase transcription rate. Stimulation of an MRE can both increase transcription and overcome repressive effects of chromatin; we suggest that these functions are linked.

Thyroid Hormone Receptors: Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation and Roles during Frog Development

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are members of the fast growing superfamily of nuclear hormone receptors. They are dual function transcription factors. In the unliganded form, they repress basal transcription of their target genes. The presence of thyroid hormone leads to not only the relief of this repression but also a strong transcriptional activation above the basal level. Mechanistically, thyroid hormone receptors appear to function as heterodimers with 9-cis-retinoic acid receptors both in the absence and in the presence of thyroid hormone. Recent studies indicate that the heterodimers can interact with thyroid hormone response elements in chromatin independently of thyroid hormone and that the receptors have evolved to function efficiently in a chromatin environment, utilizing chromatin assembly to effectively repress transcription in the absence of thyroid hormone and overcoming the repression by chromatin by inducing chromatin disruption in the presence of the hormone. In addition, a number of TR-interacting proteins have been isolated. How these proteins participate in the regulation of transcription by TRs remains to be elucidated. Independent of the exact mechanisms of action, the developmental expression of thyroid hormone receptor genes during amphibian metamorphosis suggests that both the repression and activation functions of the receptors are important for proper control of the temporal and tissue-specific regulation of metamorphosis. Copyright 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

cis-acting sequences located downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter affect its chromatin structure and transcriptional activity

We have examined the roles of AP-1, AP-3-like, DBF1, and Sp1 binding sites, which are located downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) promoter, in regulating basal transcriptional activity directed by the integrated viral long terminal repeat (LTR). Point mutations affecting all four of these elements functionally inactivated the HIV-1 LTR when it was constrained in a chromatin configuration. Analyses of the chromatin structures of the transcriptionally active wild-type and inactive mutated HIV-1 promoters revealed several differences. In the active promoter, the 3' half of the U3 region, including the basal promoter, the enhancer, and the putative upstream regulatory sequences are situated within a nuclease-hypersensitive region. However, the far upstream U3 region appears to be packaged into a nuclease-resistant nucleosomal structure, whereas the R, U5, and gag leader sequences are associated with a region of altered chromatin that is sensitive to restriction endonucleases. In the inactive template, only the basal promoter and enhancer element remain sensitive to nucleases, and the adjacent upstream and downstream regions are incorporated into nuclease-resistant nucleosomal structures. Taken together, these results indicate that the chromatin structure of the integrated HIV-1 LTR plays a critical role in modulating basal transcriptional activity.

Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes

During the past year, the characterization of mechanisms and factors capable of disrupting nucleosomes during transcriptional activation has been a recurrent theme in studies which address the contribution of nucleosome structure to gene regulation. In vivo studies using yeast and Drosophila together with biochemical purification schemes using nucleosome perturbation assays have provided evidence for the existence of multiprotein complexes that are able to alleviate nucleosome repression. At the same time, new insights into the mechanism of heterochromatin formation have been gained, which have direct links to nucleosome structure.

The affinity of nuclear factor 1 for its DNA site is drastically reduced by nucleosome organization irrespective of its rotational or translational position

A DNA-bending sequence has been used for in vitro reconstitution of nucleosomes in order to direct a nuclear factor 1 (NF-1) binding site into different nucleosome positions. By this strategy nucleosomes were obtained that had one of two rotational positions of the NF-1 binding site, one oriented toward the periphery and the other toward the histone octamer, translationally positioned 50 and 45 base pairs, respectively, from the nucleosome dyad. The affinity of partially purified NF-1 for these nucleosomal targets was compared with its affinity for free DNA by dimethylsulfate methylation protection and DNase I footprinting assays. The binding affinity of NF-1 to all nucleosomal targets was reduced 100-300-fold compared with its affinity for free DNA. The two rotational settings of the NF-1 site showed the same binding affinity for NF-1 as did other nucleosome constructs in which the NF-1 binding site was translationally positioned from 10 to 40 base pairs from the nucleosome dyad. We conclude that the nucleosomal inhibition of NF-1 binding is an inherent characteristic of NF-1 since another transcription factor, the glucocorticoid receptor, is able to bind to its DNA site in a nucleosome.

NF-kappa B-mediated chromatin reconfiguration and transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 enhancer in vitro

NF-kappa B is a potent inducible transcription factor that regulates many genes in activated T cells. In this report we examined the ability of different subunits of NF-kappa B to enhance HIV-1 transcription in vitro with chromatin templates. We find that the p65 subunit of NF-kappa B is a strong transcriptional activator of nucleosome-assembled HIV-1 DNA, whereas p50 does not activate transcription, and that p65 activates transcription synergistically with Sp1 and distal HIV-1 enhancer-binding factors (LEF-1, Ets-1, and TFE-3). These effects were observed with chromatin, but not with nonchromatin templates. Furthermore, binding of either p50 or p65 with Sp1 induces rearrangement of the chromatin to a structure that resembles the one reported previously for integrated HIV-1 proviral DNA in vivo. These results suggest that p50 and Sp1 contribute to the establishment of the nucleosomal arrangement of the uninduced provirus in resting T cells, and that p65 activates transcription by recruitment of the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery to the chromatin-repressed basal promoter.

Transformations in null mutants of Hox genes: do they represent intercalary regenerates?

In the minds of many, Hox gene null mutant phenotypes have confirmed the direct role that these genes play in specifying the pattern of vertebrate embryos. The genes are envisaged as defining discrete spatial domains and, subsequently, conferring specific segmental identities on cells undergoing differentiation along the antero-posterior axis. However, several aspects of the observed mutant phenotypes are inconsistent with this view. These include: the appearance of other, unexpected transformations along the dorsal axis; the occurrence of mirror-image duplications; and the development of anomalies outside the established domains of normal Hox gene expression. In this paper, Hox gene disruptions are shown to elicit regeneration-like responses in tissues confronted with discontinuities in axial identity. The polarities and orientations of transformed segments which emerge as a consequence of this response obey the rules of distal transformation and intercalary regeneration. In addition, the incidence of periodic anomalies suggests that the initial steps of Hox-mediated patterning occurs in Hensen's node. As gastrulation proceeds, mesoderm cell cycle kinetics impose constraints upon subsequent cellular differentiation. This results in the delayed manifestation of transformations along the antero-posterior axis. Finally, a paradigm is sketched in which temporal, rather than spatial axial determinants direct differentiation. Specific, testable predictions are made about the role of Hox genes in the establishment of segmental identity.

A role for nucleosome assembly in both silencing and activation of the Xenopus TR beta A gene by the thyroid hormone receptor

We have assembled the thyroid hormone-inducible promoter of the Xenopus thyroid hormone receptor (TR)beta A gene into chromatin using replication-coupled and -independent assembly pathways in vivo. We establish that heterodimers of TR and 9-cis retinoic acid receptors (RXR) can bind to their recognition sites within chromatin both in vivo and in vitro and alternately repress or activate transcription dependent on the absence or presence of thyroid hormone. Maximal transcriptional repression requires the presence of unliganded TR/RXR heterodimers during replication-coupled chromatin assembly. We demonstrate an increase in transcription directed by the TR beta A promoter of over two orders of magnitude in vivo, following the addition of thyroid hormone. This increase in transcription involves the relief of the repressed state that is established by the unliganded TR/RXR heterodimer during replication-coupled chromatin assembly. The association of thyroid hormone with the chromatin-bound TR/RXR heterodimer leads to the disruption of local chromatin structure in a transcription-independent process. Thus, chromatin structure has multiple roles in the regulation of TR beta A gene expression in vivo: The TR/RXR heterodimer recognizes the response element within chromatin, TR/RXR makes use of the chromatin assembly process to silence transcription more efficiently, and TR/RXR directs the disruption of local chromatin structure in response to thyroid hormone.