In vivo imaging of Drosophila larval neuromuscular junctions to study synapse assembly

Loss of the extracellular matrix protein Perlecan disrupts axonal and synaptic stability during Drosophila development

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) form essential components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membrane (BM) and have both structural and signaling roles. Perlecan is a secreted ECM-localized HSPG that contributes to tissue integrity and cell-cell communication. Although a core component of the ECM, the role of Perlecan in neuronal structure and function is less understood. Here, we identify a role for Drosophila Perlecan in the maintenance of larval motoneuron axonal and synaptic stability. Loss of Perlecan causes alterations in the axonal cytoskeleton, followed by axonal breakage and synaptic retraction of neuromuscular junctions. These phenotypes are not prevented by blocking Wallerian degeneration and are independent of Perlecan's role in Wingless signaling. Expression of Perlecan solely in motoneurons cannot rescue synaptic retraction phenotypes. Similarly, removing Perlecan specifically from neurons, glia, or muscle does not cause synaptic retraction, indicating the protein is secreted from multiple cell types and functions non-cell autonomously. Within the peripheral nervous system, Perlecan predominantly localizes to the neural lamella, a specialized ECM surrounding nerve bundles. Indeed, the neural lamella is disrupted in the absence of Perlecan, with axons occasionally exiting their usual boundary in the nerve bundle. In addition, entire nerve bundles degenerate in a temporally coordinated manner across individual hemi-segments throughout larval development. These observations indicate disruption of neural lamella ECM function triggers axonal destabilization and synaptic retraction of motoneurons, revealing a role for Perlecan in axonal and synaptic integrity during nervous system development.

LarvaSPA, A Method for Mounting Drosophila Larva for Long-Term Time-Lapse Imaging

Live imaging is a valuable approach for investigating cell biology questions. The Drosophila larva is particularly suited for in vivo live imaging because the larval body wall and most internal organs are transparent. However, continuous live imaging of intact Drosophila larvae for longer than 30 min has been challenging because it is difficult to noninvasively immobilizeimmobilizing larvae for a long time. Here we present a larval mounting method called LarvaSPA that allows for continuous imaging of live Drosophila larvae with high temporal and spatial resolution for longer than 10 hours. This method involves partially attaching larvae to the coverslip using a UV-reactive glue and additionally restraining larval movement using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) block. This method is compatible with larvae at developmental stages from second instar to wandering third instar. We demonstrate applications of this method in studying dynamic processes of Drosophila somatosensory neurons, including dendrite growth and injury-induced dendrite degeneration. This method can also be applied to study many other cellular processes that happen near the larval body wall.

Characterization of developmental and molecular factors underlying release heterogeneity at Drosophila synapses

Neurons communicate through neurotransmitter release at specialized synaptic regions known as active zones (AZs). Using biosensors to visualize single synaptic vesicle fusion events at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions, we analyzed the developmental and molecular determinants of release probability (P_r) for a defined connection with ~300 AZs. P_r was heterogeneous but represented a stable feature of each AZ. P_r remained stable during high frequency stimulation and retained heterogeneity in mutants lacking the Ca²⁺ sensor Synaptotagmin 1. P_r correlated with both presynaptic Ca²⁺ channel abundance and Ca²⁺ influx at individual release sites. P_r heterogeneity also correlated with glutamate receptor abundance, with high P_r connections developing receptor subtype segregation. Intravital imaging throughout development revealed that AZs acquire high P_r during a multi-day maturation period, with P_r heterogeneity largely reflecting AZ age. The rate of synapse maturation was activity-dependent, as both increases and decreases in neuronal activity modulated glutamate receptor field size and segregation.

To send a message to its neighbor, a neuron releases chemicals called neurotransmitters into the gap – or synapse – between them. The neurotransmitter molecules bind to proteins on the receiver neuron called receptors. But what causes the sender neuron to release neurotransmitter in the first place? The process starts when an electrical impulse called an action potential arrives at the sender cell. Its arrival causes channels in the membrane of the sender neuron to open, so that calcium ions flood into the cell. The calcium ions interact with packages of neurotransmitter molecules, known as synaptic vesicles. This causes some of the vesicles to empty their contents into the synapse.

But this process is not particularly reliable. Only a small fraction of action potentials cause vesicles to fuse with the synaptic membrane. How likely this is to occur varies greatly between neurons, and even between synapses formed by the same neuron. Synapses that are likely to release neurotransmitter are said to be strong. They are good at passing messages from the sender neuron to the receiver. Synapses with a low probability of release are said to be weak. But what exactly differs between strong and weak synapses?

Akbergenova et al. studied synapses between motor neurons and muscle cells in the fruit fly Drosophila. Each motor neuron forms several hundred synapses. Some of these synapses are 50 times more likely to release neurotransmitter than others. Using calcium imaging and genetics, Akbergenova et al. showed that sender cells at strong synapses have more calcium channels than sender cells at weak synapses. The subtypes and arrangement of receptor proteins also differ between the receiver neurons of strong versus weak synapses. Finally, studies in larvae revealed that newly formed synapses all start out weak and then gradually become stronger. How fast this strengthening occurs depends on how active the neuron at the synapse is.

This study has shown, in unprecedented detail, key molecular factors that make some fruit fly synapses more likely to release neurotransmitter than others. Many proteins at synapses of mammals resemble those at fruit fly synapses. This means that similar factors may also explain differences in synaptic strength in the mammalian brain. Changes in the strength of synapses underlie the ability to learn. Furthermore, many neurological and psychiatric disorders result from disruption of synapses. Understanding the molecular basis of synapses will thus provide clues to the origins of certain brain diseases.

Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases

Many of the internal organ systems of Drosophila melanogaster are functionally analogous to those in vertebrates, including humans. Although humans and flies differ greatly in terms of their gross morphological and cellular features, many of the molecular mechanisms that govern development and drive cellular and physiological processes are conserved between both organisms. The morphological differences are deceiving and have led researchers to undervalue the study of invertebrate organs in unraveling pathogenic mechanisms of diseases. In this review and accompanying poster, we highlight the physiological and molecular parallels between fly and human organs that validate the use of Drosophila to study the molecular pathogenesis underlying human diseases. We discuss assays that have been developed in flies to study the function of specific genes in the central nervous system, heart, liver and kidney, and provide examples of the use of these assays to address questions related to human diseases. These assays provide us with simple yet powerful tools to study the pathogenic mechanisms associated with human disease-causing genes.

Editors' choice - Drosophila Collection: In this review and accompanying poster, we highlight the physiological and molecular parallels between fly and human organs that validate the use of Drosophila to study the molecular pathogenesis underlying human diseases.

In vivo imaging of the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction

In the past decade, a significant number of proteins involved in the developmental assembly and maturation of synapses have been identified. However, detailed knowledge of the molecular processes underlying developmental synapse assembly is still sparse. We have developed an approach that makes extended in vivo imaging of selected proteins in live Drosophila larvae feasible at a single-synapse resolution. This protocol describes the repetitive, noninvasive imaging of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of a live, intact, anesthetized Drosophila larva over extended periods of time with confocal microscopy. Proteins of interest must be tagged with a fluorescent label and have to be expressed in transgenic fly strains. The method has proven highly useful for the study of synaptic assembly and the trafficking of proteins. These data contribute to our understanding of synaptic assembly under in vivo conditions.

Building an imaging chamber for in vivo imaging of Drosophila larvae

In the past decade, a significant number of proteins involved in the developmental assembly and maturation of synapses have been identified. However, detailed knowledge of the molecular processes underlying developmental synapse assembly is still sparse. We have developed an approach that makes extended in vivo imaging of selected proteins in live Drosophila larvae feasible at a single-synapse resolution. The intact larvae are anesthetized and noninvasively imaged with confocal microscopy. This method allows for both protein trafficking and protein turnover kinetics to be studied at various points in time during the development of an animal. These data contribute to our understanding of synaptic assembly under in vivo conditions. This protocol describes the assembly of the imaging chamber needed for in vivo imaging of Drosophila larvae. It also covers the construction of an appropriate anesthetization device.

Quantitative analysis of Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction morphology

In the past decade, a significant number of proteins involved in the developmental assembly and maturation of synapses have been identified. However, detailed knowledge of the molecular processes underlying developmental synapse assembly is still sparse. We have developed an approach that makes extended in vivo imaging of selected proteins in live Drosophila larvae feasible at a single-synapse resolution. The intact larvae are anesthetized and neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are noninvasively imaged with confocal microscopy. This method allows for both protein trafficking and protein turnover kinetics to be studied at various points in time during the development of an animal. These data contribute to our understanding of synaptic assembly under in vivo conditions. Image analysis and quantification are best performed in three dimensions (3D; e.g., with the software Imaris by Bitplane), but they can also be performed using a simpler method for two-dimensional (2D) analysis using the free software ImageJ as presented in this protocol. We propose various possibilities for how an analysis may be performed with ImageJ, rather than providing an inflexible protocol, in which the steps must be followed without modifications. Although execution of most of the tools will be described via the ImageJ menu, most are also readily accessible through icons in ImageJ McMaster Biophotonics Facility (MBF) toolsets. These toolsets can also very easily be adapted for higher efficiency.