Reconstituting Nuclear and Chromosome Dynamics Using Xenopus Extracts

Cohesin and CTCF do not assemble TADs in Xenopus sperm and male pronuclei

Paternal genomes are compacted during spermiogenesis and decompacted following fertilization. These processes are fundamental for inheritance but incompletely understood. We analyzed these processes in the frog Xenopus laevis, whose sperm can be assembled into functional pronuclei in egg extracts in vitro. In such extracts, cohesin extrudes DNA into loops, but in vivo cohesin only assembles topologically associating domains (TADs) at the mid-blastula transition (MBT). Why cohesin assembles TADs only at this stage is unknown. We first analyzed genome architecture in frog sperm and compared it to human and mouse. Our results indicate that sperm genome organization is conserved between frogs and humans and occurs without formation of TADs. TADs can be detected in mouse sperm samples, as reported, but these structures might originate from somatic chromatin contaminations. We therefore discuss the possibility that the absence of TADs might be a general feature of vertebrate sperm. To analyze sperm genome remodeling upon fertilization, we reconstituted male pronuclei in Xenopus egg extracts. In pronuclei, chromatin compartmentalization increases, but cohesin does not accumulate at CTCF sites and assemble TADs. However, if pronuclei are formed in the presence of exogenous CTCF, CTCF binds to its consensus sites, and cohesin accumulates at these and forms short-range chromatin loops, which are preferentially anchored at CTCF's N terminus. These results indicate that TADs are only assembled at MBT because before this stage CTCF sites are not occupied and cohesin only forms short-range chromatin loops.

The cohesin modifier ESCO2 is stable during DNA replication

Cohesion between sister chromatids by the cohesin protein complex ensures accurate chromosome segregation and enables recombinational DNA repair. Sister chromatid cohesion is promoted by acetylation of the SMC3 subunit of cohesin by the ESCO2 acetyltransferase, inhibiting cohesin release from chromatin. The interaction of ESCO2 with the DNA replication machinery, in part through PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) motifs in ESCO2, is required for full cohesion establishment. Recent reports have suggested that Cul4-dependent degradation regulates the level of ESCO2 protein following replication. To follow up on these observations, we have characterized ESCO2 stability in Xenopus egg extracts, a cell-free system that recapitulates cohesion establishment in vitro. We found that ESCO2 was stable during DNA replication in this system. Indeed, further challenging the system by inducing DNA damage signaling or increasing the number of nuclei undergoing DNA replication had no significant impact on the stability of ESCO2. In transgenic somatic cell lines, we also did not see evidence of GFP-ESCO2 degradation during S phase of the cell cycle using both flow cytometry and live-cell imaging. We conclude that ESCO2 is stable during DNA replication in both embryonic and somatic cells.