1
|
Jessberger G, Várnai C, Stocsits RR, Tang W, Stary G, Peters JM. Cohesin and CTCF do not assemble TADs in Xenopus sperm and male pronuclei. Genome Res 2023; 33:gr.277865.123. [PMID: 38129077 PMCID: PMC10760524 DOI: 10.1101/gr.277865.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Paternal genomes are compacted during spermiogenesis and decompacted following fertilization. These processes are fundamental for inheritance but incompletely understood. We analyzed these processes in the frog Xenopus laevis, whose sperm can be assembled into functional pronuclei in egg extracts in vitro. In such extracts, cohesin extrudes DNA into loops, but in vivo cohesin only assembles topologically associating domains (TADs) at the mid-blastula transition (MBT). Why cohesin assembles TADs only at this stage is unknown. We first analyzed genome architecture in frog sperm and compared it to human and mouse. Our results indicate that sperm genome organization is conserved between frogs and humans and occurs without formation of TADs. TADs can be detected in mouse sperm samples, as reported, but these structures might originate from somatic chromatin contaminations. We therefore discuss the possibility that the absence of TADs might be a general feature of vertebrate sperm. To analyze sperm genome remodeling upon fertilization, we reconstituted male pronuclei in Xenopus egg extracts. In pronuclei, chromatin compartmentalization increases, but cohesin does not accumulate at CTCF sites and assemble TADs. However, if pronuclei are formed in the presence of exogenous CTCF, CTCF binds to its consensus sites, and cohesin accumulates at these and forms short-range chromatin loops, which are preferentially anchored at CTCF's N terminus. These results indicate that TADs are only assembled at MBT because before this stage CTCF sites are not occupied and cohesin only forms short-range chromatin loops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Jessberger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Csilla Várnai
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, United Kingdom
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Stary
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dekker C, Haering CH, Peters JM, Rowland BD. How do molecular motors fold the genome? Science 2023; 382:646-648. [PMID: 37943927 DOI: 10.1126/science.adi8308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
A potential mechanism of DNA loop extrusion by molecular motors is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Christian H Haering
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin D Rowland
- Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nagasaka K, Davidson IF, Stocsits RR, Tang W, Wutz G, Batty P, Panarotto M, Litos G, Schleiffer A, Gerlich DW, Peters JM. Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell 2023; 83:3049-3063.e6. [PMID: 37591243 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Cohesin connects CTCF-binding sites and other genomic loci in cis to form chromatin loops and replicated DNA molecules in trans to mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Whether cohesin uses distinct or related mechanisms to perform these functions is unknown. Here, we describe a cohesin hinge mutant that can extrude DNA into loops but is unable to mediate cohesion in human cells. Our results suggest that the latter defect arises during cohesion establishment. The observation that cohesin's cohesion and loop extrusion activities can be partially separated indicates that cohesin uses distinct mechanisms to perform these two functions. Unexpectedly, the same hinge mutant can also not be stopped by CTCF boundaries as well as wild-type cohesin. This suggests that cohesion establishment and cohesin's interaction with CTCF boundaries depend on related mechanisms and raises the possibility that both require transient hinge opening to entrap DNA inside the cohesin ring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Paul Batty
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria; Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Melanie Panarotto
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria; Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Gabriele Litos
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Alexander Schleiffer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria; Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna 1030, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barth R, Pradhan B, Kim E, Davidson IF, van der Torre J, Peters JM, Dekker C. Author Correction: Testing pseudotopological and nontopological models for SMC-driven DNA loop extrusion against roadblock-traversal experiments. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11616. [PMID: 37463951 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38687-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Biswajit Pradhan
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Max-Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Eugene Kim
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Max-Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jaco van der Torre
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pobegalov G, Chu LY, Peters JM, Molodtsov MI. Single cohesin molecules generate force by two distinct mechanisms. Nat Commun 2023; 14:3946. [PMID: 37402740 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Spatial organization of DNA is facilitated by cohesin protein complexes that move on DNA and extrude DNA loops. How cohesin works mechanistically as a molecular machine is poorly understood. Here, we measure mechanical forces generated by conformational changes in single cohesin molecules. We show that bending of SMC coiled coils is driven by random thermal fluctuations leading to a ~32 nm head-hinge displacement that resists forces up to 1 pN; ATPase head engagement occurs in a single step of ~10 nm and is driven by an ATP dependent head-head movement, resisting forces up to 15 pN. Our molecular dynamic simulations show that the energy of head engagement can be stored in a mechanically strained conformation of NIPBL and released during disengagement. These findings reveal how single cohesin molecules generate force by two distinct mechanisms. We present a model, which proposes how this ability may power different aspects of cohesin-DNA interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgii Pobegalov
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Lee-Ya Chu
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, 1030, Austria
| | - Maxim I Molodtsov
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, 1030, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barth R, Pradhan B, Kim E, Davidson IF, van der Torre J, Peters JM, Dekker C. Testing pseudotopological and nontopological models for SMC-driven DNA loop extrusion against roadblock-traversal experiments. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8100. [PMID: 37208374 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35359-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA loop extrusion by structural-maintenance-of-chromosome (SMC) complexes has emerged as a primary organizing principle for chromosomes. The mechanism by which SMC motor proteins extrude DNA loops is still unresolved and much debated. The ring-like structure of SMC complexes prompted multiple models where the extruded DNA is topologically or pseudotopologically entrapped within the ring during loop extrusion. However, recent experiments showed the passage of roadblocks much bigger than the SMC ring size, suggesting a nontopological mechanism. Recently, attempts were made to reconcile the observed passage of large roadblocks with a pseudotopological mechanism. Here we examine the predictions of these pseudotopological models and find that they are not consistent with new experimental data on SMC roadblock encounters. Particularly, these models predict the formation of two loops and that roadblocks will reside near the stem of the loop upon encounter-both in contrast to experimental observations. Overall, the experimental data reinforce the notion of a nontopological mechanism for extrusion of DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Biswajit Pradhan
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Max-Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Eugene Kim
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Max-Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jaco van der Torre
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hill L, Wutz G, Jaritz M, Tagoh H, Calderón L, Peters JM, Goloborodko A, Busslinger M. Igh and Igk loci use different folding principles for V gene recombination due to distinct chromosomal architectures of pro-B and pre-B cells. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2316. [PMID: 37085514 PMCID: PMC10121685 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37994-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Extended loop extrusion across the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (Igh) locus facilitates VH-DJH recombination following downregulation of the cohesin-release factor Wapl by Pax5, resulting in global changes in the chromosomal architecture of pro-B cells. Here, we demonstrate that chromatin looping and VK-JK recombination at the Igk locus were insensitive to Wapl upregulation in pre-B cells. Notably, the Wapl protein was expressed at a 2.2-fold higher level in pre-B cells compared with pro-B cells, which resulted in a distinct chromosomal architecture with normal loop sizes in pre-B cells. High-resolution chromosomal contact analysis of the Igk locus identified multiple internal loops, which likely juxtapose VK and JK elements to facilitate VK-JK recombination. The higher Wapl expression in Igμ-transgenic pre-B cells prevented extended loop extrusion at the Igh locus, leading to recombination of only the 6 most 3' proximal VH genes and likely to allelic exclusion of all other VH genes in pre-B cells. These results suggest that pro-B and pre-B cells with their distinct chromosomal architectures use different chromatin folding principles for V gene recombination, thereby enabling allelic exclusion at the Igh locus, when the Igk locus is recombined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Hill
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Jaritz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hiromi Tagoh
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lesly Calderón
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anton Goloborodko
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, A-1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Meinrad Busslinger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davidson IF, Barth R, Zaczek M, van der Torre J, Tang W, Nagasaka K, Janissen R, Kerssemakers J, Wutz G, Dekker C, Peters JM. CTCF is a DNA-tension-dependent barrier to cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. Nature 2023; 616:822-827. [PMID: 37076620 PMCID: PMC10132984 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05961-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, genomic DNA is extruded into loops by cohesin1. By restraining this process, the DNA-binding protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) generates topologically associating domains (TADs)2,3 that have important roles in gene regulation and recombination during development and disease1,4-7. How CTCF establishes TAD boundaries and to what extent these are permeable to cohesin is unclear8. Here, to address these questions, we visualize interactions of single CTCF and cohesin molecules on DNA in vitro. We show that CTCF is sufficient to block diffusing cohesin, possibly reflecting how cohesive cohesin accumulates at TAD boundaries, and is also sufficient to block loop-extruding cohesin, reflecting how CTCF establishes TAD boundaries. CTCF functions asymmetrically, as predicted; however, CTCF is dependent on DNA tension. Moreover, CTCF regulates cohesin's loop-extrusion activity by changing its direction and by inducing loop shrinkage. Our data indicate that CTCF is not, as previously assumed, simply a barrier to cohesin-mediated loop extrusion but is an active regulator of this process, whereby the permeability of TAD boundaries can be modulated by DNA tension. These results reveal mechanistic principles of how CTCF controls loop extrusion and genome architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Maciej Zaczek
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
- Children's Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jaco van der Torre
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Janissen
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Jacob Kerssemakers
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Banigan EJ, Tang W, van den Berg AA, Stocsits RR, Wutz G, Brandão HB, Busslinger GA, Peters JM, Mirny LA. Transcription shapes 3D chromatin organization by interacting with loop extrusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2210480120. [PMID: 36897969 PMCID: PMC10089175 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2210480120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin folds mammalian interphase chromosomes by extruding the chromatin fiber into numerous loops. "Loop extrusion" can be impeded by chromatin-bound factors, such as CTCF, which generates characteristic and functional chromatin organization patterns. It has been proposed that transcription relocalizes or interferes with cohesin and that active promoters are cohesin loading sites. However, the effects of transcription on cohesin have not been reconciled with observations of active extrusion by cohesin. To determine how transcription modulates extrusion, we studied mouse cells in which we could alter cohesin abundance, dynamics, and localization by genetic "knockouts" of the cohesin regulators CTCF and Wapl. Through Hi-C experiments, we discovered intricate, cohesin-dependent contact patterns near active genes. Chromatin organization around active genes exhibited hallmarks of interactions between transcribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and extruding cohesins. These observations could be reproduced by polymer simulations in which RNAPs were moving barriers to extrusion that obstructed, slowed, and pushed cohesins. The simulations predicted that preferential loading of cohesin at promoters is inconsistent with our experimental data. Additional ChIP-seq experiments showed that the putative cohesin loader Nipbl is not predominantly enriched at promoters. Therefore, we propose that cohesin is not preferentially loaded at promoters and that the barrier function of RNAP accounts for cohesin accumulation at active promoters. Altogether, we find that RNAP is an extrusion barrier that is not stationary, but rather, translocates and relocalizes cohesin. Loop extrusion and transcription might interact to dynamically generate and maintain gene interactions with regulatory elements and shape functional genomic organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J. Banigan
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter1030Vienna, Austria
| | - Aafke A. van den Berg
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Roman R. Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter1030Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter1030Vienna, Austria
| | - Hugo B. Brandão
- Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA02138
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA02142
| | - Georg A. Busslinger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter1030Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna1090, Austria
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter1030Vienna, Austria
| | - Leonid A. Mirny
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pradhan B, Barth R, Kim E, Davidson IF, Bauer B, van Laar T, Yang W, Ryu JK, van der Torre J, Peters JM, Dekker C. SMC complexes can traverse physical roadblocks bigger than their ring size. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111491. [PMID: 36261017 DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.15.452501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Ring-shaped structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes like condensin and cohesin extrude loops of DNA. It remains, however, unclear how they can extrude DNA loops in chromatin that is bound with proteins. Here, we use in vitro single-molecule visualization to show that nucleosomes, RNA polymerase, and dCas9 pose virtually no barrier to loop extrusion by yeast condensin. We find that even DNA-bound nanoparticles as large as 200 nm, much bigger than the SMC ring size, also translocate into DNA loops during extrusion by condensin and cohesin. This even occurs for a single-chain version of cohesin in which the ring-forming subunits are covalently linked and cannot open to entrap DNA. The data show that SMC-driven loop extrusion has surprisingly little difficulty in accommodating large roadblocks into the loop. The findings also show that the extruded DNA does not pass through the SMC ring (pseudo)topologically, hence pointing to a nontopological mechanism for DNA loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswajit Pradhan
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Roman Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Eugene Kim
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Bauer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Theo van Laar
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Nynke Dekker Lab, Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Wayne Yang
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Je-Kyung Ryu
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Jaco van der Torre
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Cees Dekker
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dequeker BJH, Scherr MJ, Brandão HB, Gassler J, Powell S, Gaspar I, Flyamer IM, Lalic A, Tang W, Stocsits R, Davidson IF, Peters JM, Duderstadt KE, Mirny LA, Tachibana K. MCM complexes are barriers that restrict cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. Nature 2022; 606:197-203. [PMID: 35585235 PMCID: PMC9159944 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04730-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are compacted into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs)1-3, which contribute to transcription, recombination and genomic stability4,5. Cohesin extrudes DNA into loops that are thought to lengthen until CTCF boundaries are encountered6-12. Little is known about whether loop extrusion is impeded by DNA-bound machines. Here we show that the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is a barrier that restricts loop extrusion in G1 phase. Single-nucleus Hi-C (high-resolution chromosome conformation capture) of mouse zygotes reveals that MCM loading reduces CTCF-anchored loops and decreases TAD boundary insulation, which suggests that loop extrusion is impeded before reaching CTCF. This effect extends to HCT116 cells, in which MCMs affect the number of CTCF-anchored loops and gene expression. Simulations suggest that MCMs are abundant, randomly positioned and partially permeable barriers. Single-molecule imaging shows that MCMs are physical barriers that frequently constrain cohesin translocation in vitro. Notably, chimeric yeast MCMs that contain a cohesin-interaction motif from human MCM3 induce cohesin pausing, indicating that MCMs are 'active' barriers with binding sites. These findings raise the possibility that cohesin can arrive by loop extrusion at MCMs, which determine the genomic sites at which sister chromatid cohesion is established. On the basis of in vivo, in silico and in vitro data, we conclude that distinct loop extrusion barriers shape the three-dimensional genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart J H Dequeker
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias J Scherr
- Structure and Dynamics of Molecular Machines, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany
| | - Hugo B Brandão
- Harvard Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Johanna Gassler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Department of Totipotency, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sean Powell
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Imre Gaspar
- Department of Totipotency, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany
| | - Ilya M Flyamer
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine (IGMM), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Aleksandar Lalic
- Department of Totipotency, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Karl E Duderstadt
- Structure and Dynamics of Molecular Machines, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany.
- Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
| | - Leonid A Mirny
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Kikuë Tachibana
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Totipotency, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (MPIB), Martinsried, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Panarotto M, Davidson IF, Litos G, Schleiffer A, Peters JM. Cornelia de Lange syndrome mutations in NIPBL can impair cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2201029119. [PMID: 35476527 PMCID: PMC9170158 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201029119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is a developmental multisystem disorder frequently associated with mutations in NIPBL. CdLS is thought to arise from developmental gene regulation defects, but how NIPBL mutations cause these is unknown. Here we show that several NIPBL mutations impair the DNA loop extrusion activity of cohesin. Because this activity is required for the formation of chromatin loops and topologically associating domains, which have important roles in gene regulation, our results suggest that defects in cohesin-mediated loop extrusion contribute to the etiology of CdLS by altering interactions between developmental genes and their enhancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Panarotto
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Iain F. Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Litos
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Schleiffer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bauer BW, Davidson IF, Canena D, Wutz G, Tang W, Litos G, Horn S, Hinterdorfer P, Peters JM. Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion by a "swing and clamp" mechanism. Cell 2021; 184:5448-5464.e22. [PMID: 34624221 PMCID: PMC8563363 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes organize genome topology in all kingdoms of life and have been proposed to perform this function by DNA loop extrusion. How this process works is unknown. Here, we have analyzed how loop extrusion is mediated by human cohesin-NIPBL complexes, which enable chromatin folding in interphase cells. We have identified DNA binding sites and large-scale conformational changes that are required for loop extrusion and have determined how these are coordinated. Our results suggest that DNA is translocated by a spontaneous 50 nm-swing of cohesin's hinge, which hands DNA over to the ATPase head of SMC3, where upon binding of ATP, DNA is clamped by NIPBL. During this process, NIPBL "jumps ship" from the hinge toward the SMC3 head and might thereby couple the spontaneous hinge swing to ATP-dependent DNA clamping. These results reveal mechanistic principles of how cohesin-NIPBL and possibly other SMC complexes mediate loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt W Bauer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Canena
- Insitute for Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Life Science Center, Gruberstrasse 40, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Litos
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabrina Horn
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria; Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Hinterdorfer
- Insitute for Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Life Science Center, Gruberstrasse 40, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Genomic DNA is folded into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs), which serve important structural and regulatory roles. It has been proposed that these genomic structures are formed by a loop extrusion process, which is mediated by structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes. Recent single-molecule studies have shown that the SMC complexes condensin and cohesin are indeed able to extrude DNA into loops. In this Review, we discuss how the loop extrusion hypothesis can explain key features of genome architecture; cellular functions of loop extrusion, such as separation of replicated DNA molecules, facilitation of enhancer-promoter interactions and immunoglobulin gene recombination; and what is known about the mechanism of loop extrusion and its regulation, for example, by chromatin boundaries that depend on the DNA binding protein CTCF. We also discuss how the loop extrusion hypothesis has led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of both genome architecture and the functions of SMC complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
'Structural maintenance of chromosomes' (SMC) complexes are required for the folding of genomic DNA into loops. Theoretical considerations and single-molecule experiments performed with the SMC complexes cohesin and condensin indicate that DNA folding occurs via loop extrusion. Recent work indicates that this process is essential for the assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination in developing B and T cells of the vertebrate immune system. Here, I review how recent studies of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain locus Igh have provided evidence for this hypothesis and how the formation of chromatin loops by cohesin and regulation of this process by CTCF and Wapl might ensure that all variable gene segments in this locus (VH segments) participate in recombination with a re-arranged DJH segment, to ensure generation of a maximally diverse repertoire of B-cell receptors and antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Lehmann
- Whitehead Institute and Department of Biology at MIT, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mitter M, Gasser C, Takacs Z, Langer CCH, Tang W, Jessberger G, Beales CT, Neuner E, Ameres SL, Peters JM, Goloborodko A, Micura R, Gerlich DW. Conformation of sister chromatids in the replicated human genome. Nature 2020; 586:139-144. [PMID: 32968280 PMCID: PMC7116725 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2744-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The three-dimensional organization of the genome supports regulated gene expression, recombination, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation during mitosis. Chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C)1,2 analysis has revealed a complex genomic landscape of internal chromosomal structures in vertebrate cells3-7, but the identical sequence of sister chromatids has made it difficult to determine how they topologically interact in replicated chromosomes. Here we describe sister-chromatid-sensitive Hi-C (scsHi-C), which is based on labelling of nascent DNA with 4-thio-thymidine and nucleoside conversion chemistry. Genome-wide conformation maps of human chromosomes reveal that sister-chromatid pairs interact most frequently at the boundaries of topologically associating domains (TADs). Continuous loading of a dynamic cohesin pool separates sister-chromatid pairs inside TADs and is required to focus sister-chromatid contacts at TAD boundaries. We identified a subset of TADs that are overall highly paired and are characterized by facultative heterochromatin and insulated topological domains that form separately within individual sister chromatids. The rich pattern of sister-chromatid topologies and our scsHi-C technology will make it possible to investigate how physical interactions between identical DNA molecules contribute to DNA repair, gene expression, chromosome segregation, and potentially other biological processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mitter
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Catherina Gasser
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Zsuzsanna Takacs
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph C H Langer
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Jessberger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Charlie T Beales
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Neuner
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stefan L Ameres
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anton Goloborodko
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ronald Micura
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hill L, Ebert A, Jaritz M, Wutz G, Nagasaka K, Tagoh H, Kostanova-Poliakova D, Schindler K, Sun Q, Bönelt P, Fischer M, Peters JM, Busslinger M. Wapl repression by Pax5 promotes V gene recombination by Igh loop extrusion. Nature 2020; 584:142-147. [PMID: 32612238 PMCID: PMC7116900 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2454-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear processes, such as V(D)J recombination, are orchestrated by the three-dimensional organization of chromosomes at multiple levels, including compartments1 and topologically associated domains (TADs)2,3 consisting of chromatin loops4. TADs are formed by chromatin-loop extrusion5-7, which depends on the loop-extrusion function of the ring-shaped cohesin complex8-12. Conversely, the cohesin-release factor Wapl13,14 restricts loop extension10,15. The generation of a diverse antibody repertoire, providing humoral immunity to pathogens, requires the participation of all V genes in V(D)J recombination16, which depends on contraction of the 2.8-Mb-long immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) locus by Pax517,18. However, how Pax5 controls Igh contraction in pro-B cells remains unknown. Here we demonstrate that locus contraction is caused by loop extrusion across the entire Igh locus. Notably, the expression of Wapl is repressed by Pax5 specifically in pro-B and pre-B cells, facilitating extended loop extrusion by increasing the residence time of cohesin on chromatin. Pax5 mediates the transcriptional repression of Wapl through a single Pax5-binding site by recruiting the polycomb repressive complex 2 to induce bivalent chromatin at the Wapl promoter. Reduced Wapl expression causes global alterations in the chromosome architecture, indicating that the potential to recombine all V genes entails structural changes of the entire genome in pro-B cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Hill
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Anja Ebert
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Jaritz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Hiromi Tagoh
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Karina Schindler
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Qiong Sun
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Bönelt
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Fischer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Meinrad Busslinger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thiecke MJ, Wutz G, Muhar M, Tang W, Bevan S, Malysheva V, Stocsits R, Neumann T, Zuber J, Fraser P, Schoenfelder S, Peters JM, Spivakov M. Cohesin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms Mediate Chromosomal Contacts between Promoters and Enhancers. Cell Rep 2020; 32:107929. [PMID: 32698000 PMCID: PMC7383238 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
It is currently assumed that 3D chromosomal organization plays a central role in transcriptional control. However, depletion of cohesin and CTCF affects the steady-state levels of only a minority of transcripts. Here, we use high-resolution Capture Hi-C to interrogate the dynamics of chromosomal contacts of all annotated human gene promoters upon degradation of cohesin and CTCF. We show that a majority of promoter-anchored contacts are lost in these conditions, but many contacts with distinct properties are maintained, and some new ones are gained. The rewiring of contacts between promoters and active enhancers upon cohesin degradation associates with rapid changes in target gene transcription as detected by SLAM sequencing (SLAM-seq). These results provide a mechanistic explanation for the limited, but consistent, effects of cohesin and CTCF depletion on steady-state transcription and suggest the existence of both cohesin-dependent and -independent mechanisms of enhancer-promoter pairing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel J Thiecke
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Matthias Muhar
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Stephen Bevan
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK
| | - Valeriya Malysheva
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London W12 0NN, UK; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Roman Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Tobias Neumann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Johannes Zuber
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Peter Fraser
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA
| | - Stefan Schoenfelder
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Mikhail Spivakov
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London W12 0NN, UK; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van der Lelij P, Newman JA, Lieb S, Jude J, Katis V, Hoffmann T, Hinterndorfer M, Bader G, Kraut N, Pearson MA, Peters JM, Zuber J, Gileadi O, Petronczki M. STAG1 vulnerabilities for exploiting cohesin synthetic lethality in STAG2-deficient cancers. Life Sci Alliance 2020; 3:e202000725. [PMID: 32467316 PMCID: PMC7266993 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The cohesin subunit STAG2 has emerged as a recurrently inactivated tumor suppressor in human cancers. Using candidate approaches, recent studies have revealed a synthetic lethal interaction between STAG2 and its paralog STAG1 To systematically probe genetic vulnerabilities in the absence of STAG2, we have performed genome-wide CRISPR screens in isogenic cell lines and identified STAG1 as the most prominent and selective dependency of STAG2-deficient cells. Using an inducible degron system, we show that chemical genetic degradation of STAG1 protein results in the loss of sister chromatid cohesion and rapid cell death in STAG2-deficient cells, while sparing STAG2-wild-type cells. Biochemical assays and X-ray crystallography identify STAG1 regions that interact with the RAD21 subunit of the cohesin complex. STAG1 mutations that abrogate this interaction selectively compromise the viability of STAG2-deficient cells. Our work highlights the degradation of STAG1 and inhibition of its interaction with RAD21 as promising therapeutic strategies. These findings lay the groundwork for the development of STAG1-directed small molecules to exploit synthetic lethality in STAG2-mutated tumors.
Collapse
Grants
- Wellcome Trust
- 106169/ZZ14/Z Wellcome Trust
- European Research Council
- Human Frontier Science Program
- Wellcome
- Innovative Medicines Initiative (European Union-EU/European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations-EFPIA)
- European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme
- Austrian Science Fund, FWF
- AbbVie, Bayer Pharma AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Eshelman Institute for Innovation, Genome Canada
- Janssen, Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany, MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation, Pfizer, São Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP, Takeda
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra van der Lelij
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Joseph A Newman
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simone Lieb
- Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna (RCV) GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julian Jude
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Vittorio Katis
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Hoffmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Hinterndorfer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd Bader
- Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna (RCV) GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Norbert Kraut
- Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna (RCV) GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark A Pearson
- Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna (RCV) GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, VBC, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Zuber
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, VBC, Vienna, Austria
| | - Opher Gileadi
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Petronczki
- Boehringer Ingelheim Regional Center Vienna (RCV) GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Silva MC, Powell S, Ladstätter S, Gassler J, Stocsits R, Tedeschi A, Peters JM, Tachibana K. Wapl releases Scc1-cohesin and regulates chromosome structure and segregation in mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol 2020; 219:e201906100. [PMID: 32328639 PMCID: PMC7147110 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201906100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin is essential for genome folding and inheritance. In somatic cells, these functions are both mediated by Scc1-cohesin, which in mitosis is released from chromosomes by Wapl and separase. In mammalian oocytes, cohesion is mediated by Rec8-cohesin. Scc1 is expressed but neither required nor sufficient for cohesion, and its function remains unknown. Likewise, it is unknown whether Wapl regulates one or both cohesin complexes and chromosome segregation in mature oocytes. Here, we show that Wapl is required for accurate meiosis I chromosome segregation, predominantly releases Scc1-cohesin from chromosomes, and promotes production of euploid eggs. Using single-nucleus Hi-C, we found that Scc1 is essential for chromosome organization in oocytes. Increasing Scc1 residence time on chromosomes by Wapl depletion leads to vermicelli formation and intra-loop structures but, unlike in somatic cells, does not increase loop size. We conclude that distinct cohesin complexes generate loops and cohesion in oocytes and propose that the same principle applies to all cell types and species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana C.C. Silva
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sean Powell
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabrina Ladstätter
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johanna Gassler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Tedeschi
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kikuë Tachibana
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Totipotency, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wutz G, Ladurner R, St Hilaire BG, Stocsits RR, Nagasaka K, Pignard B, Sanborn A, Tang W, Várnai C, Ivanov MP, Schoenfelder S, van der Lelij P, Huang X, Dürnberger G, Roitinger E, Mechtler K, Davidson IF, Fraser P, Lieberman-Aiden E, Peters JM. ESCO1 and CTCF enable formation of long chromatin loops by protecting cohesin STAG1 from WAPL. eLife 2020; 9:e52091. [PMID: 32065581 PMCID: PMC7054000 DOI: 10.7554/elife.52091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are folded into loops. It is thought that these are formed by cohesin complexes via extrusion, either until loop expansion is arrested by CTCF or until cohesin is removed from DNA by WAPL. Although WAPL limits cohesin's chromatin residence time to minutes, it has been reported that some loops exist for hours. How these loops can persist is unknown. We show that during G1-phase, mammalian cells contain acetylated cohesinSTAG1 which binds chromatin for hours, whereas cohesinSTAG2 binds chromatin for minutes. Our results indicate that CTCF and the acetyltransferase ESCO1 protect a subset of cohesinSTAG1 complexes from WAPL, thereby enable formation of long and presumably long-lived loops, and that ESCO1, like CTCF, contributes to boundary formation in chromatin looping. Our data are consistent with a model of nested loop extrusion, in which acetylated cohesinSTAG1 forms stable loops between CTCF sites, demarcating the boundaries of more transient cohesinSTAG2 extrusion activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Rene Ladurner
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Brian Glenn St Hilaire
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice UniversityHoustonUnited States
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Benoit Pignard
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Adrian Sanborn
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Csilla Várnai
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research CampusCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | - Miroslav P Ivanov
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Stefan Schoenfelder
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research CampusCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Petra van der Lelij
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Xingfan Huang
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Departments of Computer Science and Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice UniversityHoustonUnited States
- Departments of Computer Science and Genome Sciences, University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
| | - Gerhard Dürnberger
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | | | - Karl Mechtler
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Iain Finley Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Peter Fraser
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research CampusCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUnited States
| | - Erez Lieberman-Aiden
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice UniversityHoustonUnited States
- Departments of Computer Science and Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice UniversityHoustonUnited States
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, Shanghai Tech UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Molodtsov M, Bauer B, Davidson I, Vaziri A, Peters JM. Cohesin is a Motor that Bends and Compacts DNA. Biophys J 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.1867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
24
|
Morales C, Ruiz-Torres M, Rodríguez-Acebes S, Lafarga V, Rodríguez-Corsino M, Megías D, Cisneros DA, Peters JM, Méndez J, Losada A. PDS5 proteins are required for proper cohesin dynamics and participate in replication fork protection. J Biol Chem 2020; 295:146-157. [PMID: 31757807 PMCID: PMC6952610 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra119.011099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cohesin is a chromatin-bound complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion and facilitates long-range interactions through DNA looping. How the transcription and replication machineries deal with the presence of cohesin on chromatin remains unclear. The dynamic association of cohesin with chromatin depends on WAPL cohesin release factor (WAPL) and on PDS5 cohesin-associated factor (PDS5), which exists in two versions in vertebrate cells, PDS5A and PDS5B. Using genetic deletion in mouse embryo fibroblasts and a combination of CRISPR-mediated gene editing and RNAi-mediated gene silencing in human cells, here we analyzed the consequences of PDS5 depletion for DNA replication. We found that either PDS5A or PDS5B is sufficient for proper cohesin dynamics and that their simultaneous removal increases cohesin's residence time on chromatin and slows down DNA replication. A similar phenotype was observed in WAPL-depleted cells. Cohesin down-regulation restored normal replication fork rates in PDS5-deficient cells, suggesting that chromatin-bound cohesin hinders the advance of the replisome. We further show that PDS5 proteins are required to recruit WRN helicase-interacting protein 1 (WRNIP1), RAD51 recombinase (RAD51), and BRCA2 DNA repair associated (BRCA2) to stalled forks and that in their absence, nascent DNA strands at unprotected forks are degraded by MRE11 homolog double-strand break repair nuclease (MRE11). These findings indicate that PDS5 proteins participate in replication fork protection and also provide insights into how cohesin and its regulators contribute to the response to replication stress, a common feature of cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Morales
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ruiz-Torres
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Rodríguez-Acebes
- DNA Replication Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanesa Lafarga
- Genome Instability Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Rodríguez-Corsino
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Megías
- Confocal Microscopy Unit, Biotechnology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - David A Cisneros
- Research Institute for Molecular Pathology (IMP), Campus Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute for Molecular Pathology (IMP), Campus Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Juan Méndez
- DNA Replication Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Losada
- Chromosome Dynamics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are folded into loops and topologically associating domains, which contribute to chromatin structure, gene regulation, and gene recombination. These structures depend on cohesin, a ring-shaped DNA-entrapping adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) complex that has been proposed to form loops by extrusion. Such an activity has been observed for condensin, which forms loops in mitosis, but not for cohesin. Using biochemical reconstitution, we found that single human cohesin complexes form DNA loops symmetrically at rates up to 2.1 kilo-base pairs per second. Loop formation and maintenance depend on cohesin's ATPase activity and on NIPBL-MAU2, but not on topological entrapment of DNA by cohesin. During loop formation, cohesin and NIPBL-MAU2 reside at the base of loops, which indicates that they generate loops by extrusion. Our results show that cohesin and NIPBL-MAU2 form an active holoenzyme that interacts with DNA either pseudo-topologically or non-topologically to extrude genomic interphase DNA into loops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Bauer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Goetz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Soh YM, Davidson IF, Zamuner S, Basquin J, Bock FP, Taschner M, Veening JW, De Los Rios P, Peters JM, Gruber S. Self-organization of parS centromeres by the ParB CTP hydrolase. Science 2019; 366:1129-1133. [PMID: 31649139 DOI: 10.1126/science.aay3965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
ParABS systems facilitate chromosome segregation and plasmid partitioning in bacteria and archaea. ParB protein binds centromeric parS DNA sequences and spreads to flanking DNA. We show that ParB is an enzyme that hydrolyzes cytidine triphosphate (CTP) to cytidine diphosphate (CDP). parS DNA stimulates cooperative CTP binding by ParB and CTP hydrolysis. A nucleotide cocrystal structure elucidates the catalytic center of the dimerization-dependent ParB CTPase. Single-molecule imaging and biochemical assays recapitulate features of ParB spreading from parS in the presence but not absence of CTP. These findings suggest that centromeres assemble by self-loading of ParB DNA sliding clamps at parS ParB CTPase is not related to known nucleotide hydrolases and might be a promising target for developing new classes of antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Min Soh
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Iain Finley Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Zamuner
- Laboratory of Statistical Biophysics, Institute of Physics, School of Basic Sciences and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Basquin
- Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Florian Patrick Bock
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael Taschner
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jan-Willem Veening
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paolo De Los Rios
- Laboratory of Statistical Biophysics, Institute of Physics, School of Basic Sciences and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC) and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Gruber
- Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Canela A, Maman Y, Huang SYN, Wutz G, Tang W, Zagnoli-Vieira G, Callen E, Wong N, Day A, Peters JM, Caldecott KW, Pommier Y, Nussenzweig A. Topoisomerase II-Induced Chromosome Breakage and Translocation Is Determined by Chromosome Architecture and Transcriptional Activity. Mol Cell 2019; 75:252-266.e8. [PMID: 31202577 PMCID: PMC8170508 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Topoisomerase II (TOP2) relieves torsional stress by forming transient cleavage complex intermediates (TOP2ccs) that contain TOP2-linked DNA breaks (DSBs). While TOP2ccs are normally reversible, they can be "trapped" by chemotherapeutic drugs such as etoposide and subsequently converted into irreversible TOP2-linked DSBs. Here, we have quantified etoposide-induced trapping of TOP2ccs, their conversion into irreversible TOP2-linked DSBs, and their processing during DNA repair genome-wide, as a function of time. We find that while TOP2 chromatin localization and trapping is independent of transcription, it requires pre-existing binding of cohesin to DNA. In contrast, the conversion of trapped TOP2ccs to irreversible DSBs during DNA repair is accelerated 2-fold at transcribed loci relative to non-transcribed loci. This conversion is dependent on proteasomal degradation and TDP2 phosphodiesterase activity. Quantitative modeling shows that only two features of pre-existing chromatin structure-namely, cohesin binding and transcriptional activity-can be used to predict the kinetics of TOP2-induced DSBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Canela
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Radiation Biology Center, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yaakov Maman
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shar-Yin N Huang
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guido Zagnoli-Vieira
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Elsa Callen
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nancy Wong
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amanda Day
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Keith W Caldecott
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK; Department of Genome Dynamics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20 Prague, 4, Czech Republic
| | - Yves Pommier
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - André Nussenzweig
- Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Holzmann J, Politi AZ, Nagasaka K, Hantsche-Grininger M, Walther N, Koch B, Fuchs J, Dürnberger G, Tang W, Ladurner R, Stocsits RR, Busslinger GA, Novák B, Mechtler K, Davidson IF, Ellenberg J, Peters JM. Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells. eLife 2019; 8:e46269. [PMID: 31204999 PMCID: PMC6606026 DOI: 10.7554/elife.46269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The organisation of mammalian genomes into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs) contributes to chromatin structure, gene expression and recombination. TADs and many loops are formed by cohesin and positioned by CTCF. In proliferating cells, cohesin also mediates sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation. Current models of chromatin folding and cohesion are based on assumptions of how many cohesin and CTCF molecules organise the genome. Here we have measured absolute copy numbers and dynamics of cohesin, CTCF, NIPBL, WAPL and sororin by mass spectrometry, fluorescence-correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in HeLa cells. In G1-phase, there are ~250,000 nuclear cohesin complexes, of which ~ 160,000 are chromatin-bound. Comparison with chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data implies that some genomic cohesin and CTCF enrichment sites are unoccupied in single cells at any one time. We discuss the implications of these findings for how cohesin can contribute to genome organisation and cohesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann Holzmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Gregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Antonio Z Politi
- Cell Biology and Biophysics UnitEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | | | - Nike Walther
- Cell Biology and Biophysics UnitEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Birgit Koch
- Cell Biology and Biophysics UnitEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Johannes Fuchs
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Gregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Gerhard Dürnberger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Gregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Rene Ladurner
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Georg A Busslinger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Béla Novák
- Department of BiochemistryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Karl Mechtler
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Gregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Iain Finley Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
| | - Jan Ellenberg
- Cell Biology and Biophysics UnitEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP)Vienna Biocenter (VBC)ViennaAustria
- Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lieb S, Blaha-Ostermann S, Kamper E, Rippka J, Schwarz C, Ehrenhöfer-Wölfer K, Schlattl A, Wernitznig A, Lipp JJ, Nagasaka K, van der Lelij P, Bader G, Koi M, Goel A, Neumüller RA, Peters JM, Kraut N, Pearson MA, Petronczki M, Wöhrle S. Werner syndrome helicase is a selective vulnerability of microsatellite instability-high tumor cells. eLife 2019; 8:43333. [PMID: 30910006 PMCID: PMC6435321 DOI: 10.7554/elife.43333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted cancer therapy is based on exploiting selective dependencies of tumor cells. By leveraging recent functional screening data of cancer cell lines we identify Werner syndrome helicase (WRN) as a novel specific vulnerability of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer cells. MSI, caused by defective mismatch repair (MMR), occurs frequently in colorectal, endometrial and gastric cancers. We demonstrate that WRN inactivation selectively impairs the viability of MSI-H but not microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal and endometrial cancer cell lines. In MSI-H cells, WRN loss results in severe genome integrity defects. ATP-binding deficient variants of WRN fail to rescue the viability phenotype of WRN-depleted MSI-H cancer cells. Reconstitution and depletion studies indicate that WRN dependence is not attributable to acute loss of MMR gene function but might arise during sustained MMR-deficiency. Our study suggests that pharmacological inhibition of WRN helicase function represents an opportunity to develop a novel targeted therapy for MSI-H cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Lieb
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Janine Rippka
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | - Jesse J Lipp
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Gerd Bader
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Minoru Koi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Ajay Goel
- Center for Gastrointestinal Research, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute and Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, United States
| | | | | | - Norbert Kraut
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Simon Wöhrle
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van den Berg AA, Wutz G, Stocsits RR, Brandao H, Busslinger G, Peters JM, Mirny L. RNAP as a Moving Barrier to Loop Extrusion. Biophys J 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
31
|
Watson ER, Brown NG, Peters JM, Stark H, Schulman BA. Posing the APC/C E3 Ubiquitin Ligase to Orchestrate Cell Division. Trends Cell Biol 2018; 29:117-134. [PMID: 30482618 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) E3 ligase controls mitosis and nonmitotic pathways through interactions with proteins that coordinate ubiquitylation. Since the discovery that the catalytic subunits of APC/C are conformationally dynamic cullin and RING proteins, many unexpected and intricate regulatory mechanisms have emerged. Here, we review structural knowledge of this regulation, focusing on: (i) coactivators, E2 ubiquitin (Ub)-conjugating enzymes, and inhibitors engage or influence multiple sites on APC/C including the cullin-RING catalytic core; and (ii) the outcomes of these interactions rely on mobility of coactivators and cullin-RING domains, which permits distinct conformations specifying different functions. Thus, APC/C is not simply an interaction hub, but is instead a dynamic, multifunctional molecular machine whose structure is remodeled by binding partners to achieve temporal ubiquitylation regulating cell division.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond R Watson
- Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, 82152, Germany
| | - Nicholas G Brown
- Department of Pharmacology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Campus Vienna Biocenter (VBC) 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Holger Stark
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Brenda A Schulman
- Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, 82152, Germany; Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cai Y, Hossain MJ, Hériché JK, Politi AZ, Walther N, Koch B, Wachsmuth M, Nijmeijer B, Kueblbeck M, Martinic-Kavur M, Ladurner R, Alexander S, Peters JM, Ellenberg J. Experimental and computational framework for a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division. Nature 2018; 561:411-415. [PMID: 30202089 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0518-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Essential biological functions, such as mitosis, require tight coordination of hundreds of proteins in space and time. Localization, the timing of interactions and changes in cellular structure are all crucial to ensure the correct assembly, function and regulation of protein complexes1-4. Imaging of live cells can reveal protein distributions and dynamics but experimental and theoretical challenges have prevented the collection of quantitative data, which are necessary for the formulation of a model of mitosis that comprehensively integrates information and enables the analysis of the dynamic interactions between the molecular parts of the mitotic machinery within changing cellular boundaries. Here we generate a canonical model of the morphological changes during the mitotic progression of human cells on the basis of four-dimensional image data. We use this model to integrate dynamic three-dimensional concentration data of many fluorescently knocked-in mitotic proteins, imaged by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy-calibrated microscopy5. The approach taken here to generate a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division is generic; it can be applied to systematically map and mine dynamic protein localization networks that drive cell division in different cell types, and can be conceptually transferred to other cellular functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Cai
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Roche Diagnostics, Waiblingen, Germany
| | - M Julius Hossain
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Antonio Z Politi
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Nike Walther
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Koch
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malte Wachsmuth
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Luxendo GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bianca Nijmeijer
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Moritz Kueblbeck
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marina Martinic-Kavur
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.,Genos, Glycoscience Research Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Rene Ladurner
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria.,Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jan Ellenberg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ivanov MP, Ladurner R, Poser I, Beveridge R, Rampler E, Hudecz O, Novatchkova M, Hériché JK, Wutz G, van der Lelij P, Kreidl E, Hutchins JR, Axelsson-Ekker H, Ellenberg J, Hyman AA, Mechtler K, Peters JM. The replicative helicase MCM recruits cohesin acetyltransferase ESCO2 to mediate centromeric sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J 2018; 37:e97150. [PMID: 29930102 PMCID: PMC6068434 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201797150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosome segregation depends on sister chromatid cohesion which is established by cohesin during DNA replication. Cohesive cohesin complexes become acetylated to prevent their precocious release by WAPL before cells have reached mitosis. To obtain insight into how DNA replication, cohesion establishment and cohesin acetylation are coordinated, we analysed the interaction partners of 55 human proteins implicated in these processes by mass spectrometry. This proteomic screen revealed that on chromatin the cohesin acetyltransferase ESCO2 associates with the MCM2-7 subcomplex of the replicative Cdc45-MCM-GINS helicase. The analysis of ESCO2 mutants defective in MCM binding indicates that these interactions are required for proper recruitment of ESCO2 to chromatin, cohesin acetylation during DNA replication, and centromeric cohesion. We propose that MCM binding enables ESCO2 to travel with replisomes to acetylate cohesive cohesin complexes in the vicinity of replication forks so that these complexes can be protected from precocious release by WAPL Our results also indicate that ESCO1 and ESCO2 have distinct functions in maintaining cohesion between chromosome arms and centromeres, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rene Ladurner
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ina Poser
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Evelyn Rampler
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Otto Hudecz
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Emanuel Kreidl
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Jan Ellenberg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anthony A Hyman
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karl Mechtler
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Heunis T, Aldrich C, Peters JM, Jeste SS, Sahin M, Scheffer C, de Vries PJ. Recurrence quantification analysis of resting state EEG signals in autism spectrum disorder - a systematic methodological exploration of technical and demographic confounders in the search for biomarkers. BMC Med 2018; 16:101. [PMID: 29961422 PMCID: PMC6027554 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1086-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a worldwide prevalence of 1-2%. In low-resource environments, in particular, early identification and diagnosis is a significant challenge. Therefore, there is a great demand for 'language-free, culturally fair' low-cost screening tools for ASD that do not require highly trained professionals. Electroencephalography (EEG) has seen growing interest as an investigational tool for biomarker development in ASD and neurodevelopmental disorders. One of the key challenges is the identification of appropriate multivariate, next-generation analytical methodologies that can characterise the complex, nonlinear dynamics of neural networks in the brain, mindful of technical and demographic confounders that may influence biomarker findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) as a potential biomarker for ASD using a systematic methodological exploration of a range of potential technical and demographic confounders. METHODS RQA feature extraction was performed on continuous 5-second segments of resting state EEG (rsEEG) data and linear and nonlinear classifiers were tested. Data analysis progressed from a full sample of 16 ASD and 46 typically developing (TD) individuals (age 0-18 years, 4802 EEG segments), to a subsample of 16 ASD and 19 TD children (age 0-6 years, 1874 segments), to an age-matched sample of 7 ASD and 7 TD children (age 2-6 years, 666 segments) to prevent sample bias and to avoid misinterpretation of the classification results attributable to technical and demographic confounders. A clinical scenario of diagnosing an unseen subject was simulated using a leave-one-subject-out classification approach. RESULTS In the age-matched sample, leave-one-subject-out classification with a nonlinear support vector machine classifier showed 92.9% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity in differentiating ASD from TD. Age, sex, intellectual ability and the number of training and test segments per group were identified as possible demographic and technical confounders. Consistent repeatability, i.e. the correct identification of all segments per subject, was found to be a challenge. CONCLUSIONS RQA of rsEEG was an accurate classifier of ASD in an age-matched sample, suggesting the potential of this approach for global screening in ASD. However, this study also showed experimentally how a range of technical challenges and demographic confounders can skew results, and highlights the importance of probing for these in future studies. We recommend validation of this methodology in a large and well-matched sample of infants and children, preferably in a low- and middle-income setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Heunis
- Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa
| | - C Aldrich
- Department of Mining Engineering and Metallurgical Engineering, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - J M Peters
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - S S Jeste
- Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - M Sahin
- Translational Neuroscience Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - C Scheffer
- Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - P J de Vries
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stanyte R, Nuebler J, Blaukopf C, Hoefler R, Stocsits R, Peters JM, Gerlich DW. Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression. J Cell Biol 2018; 217:1985-2004. [PMID: 29695489 PMCID: PMC5987726 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201801157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Faithful genome transmission in dividing cells requires that the two copies of each chromosome's DNA package into separate but physically linked sister chromatids. The linkage between sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin, yet where sister chromatids are linked and how they resolve during cell cycle progression has remained unclear. In this study, we investigated sister chromatid organization in live human cells using dCas9-mEGFP labeling of endogenous genomic loci. We detected substantial sister locus separation during G2 phase irrespective of the proximity to cohesin enrichment sites. Almost all sister loci separated within a few hours after their respective replication and then rapidly equilibrated their average distances within dynamic chromatin polymers. Our findings explain why the topology of sister chromatid resolution in G2 largely reflects the DNA replication program. Furthermore, these data suggest that cohesin enrichment sites are not persistent cohesive sites in human cells. Rather, cohesion might occur at variable genomic positions within the cell population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rugile Stanyte
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Nuebler
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Claudia Blaukopf
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolf Hoefler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brandão HB, Gassler J, Imakaev M, Flyamer IM, Ladstätter S, Bickmore WA, Peters JM, Tachibana-Konwalski K, Mirny LA. A Mechanism of Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion Organizes Mammalian Chromatin Structure in the Developing Embryo. Biophys J 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.1417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
37
|
Abstract
As carriers of the genetic material, chromosomes are of prime interest in the life sciences. Although all aspects of chromosome biology should ideally be studied in living cells, the isolation of chromosomes can greatly facilitate their analysis. This can be achieved by lysing mitotic or meiotic cells under conditions where their content, including their chromosomes, is spread out on the surface of microscopy glass slides. Here we describe three such chromosome spreading techniques, which have been instrumental in analyzing chromosomes from either mouse oocytes or mammalian cultured cells in mitosis. For both chromosomes from oocytes and mitotic cells, we describe immunofluorescence protocols that enable the visualization of proteins with specific antibodies. For mitotic chromosomes, we also provide a classic protocol for Giemsa staining. This protocol cannot be used to localize proteins but is useful to determine structural features of chromosomes, such as sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation. The question of how chromosome nondisjunction during the meiotic division causes aneuploidy is of great interest in oocyte chromosome research. Because we have found that ploidy in mouse oocytes can be determined more reliably in fixed cells than in spread chromosomes, we also describe a protocol for the in situ fixation and immunofluorescence analysis of chromosomes in mouse oocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana C C Silva
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Kikuë Tachibana
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The reconstitution of recombinant protein complexes is facilitated by methods that allow coexpression of their subunits from a single vector. Here we describe a detailed step-by-step protocol for the biGBac cloning method which can be used to generate baculoviral transfer vectors coding for up to 25 subunits of a protein complex (Weissmann et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(19):E2564-E2569, 2016). biGBac is based on Gibson assembly reactions, optimized DNA linker sequences, and uses a hierarchical two-step assembly procedure. In the first assembly step, up to five expression cassettes are combined to generate a polygene cassette. In the second step, up to five polygene cassettes can then be combined to generate transfer vectors coding for up to 25 subunits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Weissmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gassler J, Brandão HB, Imakaev M, Flyamer IM, Ladstätter S, Bickmore WA, Peters JM, Mirny LA, Tachibana K. A mechanism of cohesin-dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture. EMBO J 2017; 36:3600-3618. [PMID: 29217590 PMCID: PMC5730859 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201798083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertilization triggers assembly of higher-order chromatin structure from a condensed maternal and a naïve paternal genome to generate a totipotent embryo. Chromatin loops and domains have been detected in mouse zygotes by single-nucleus Hi-C (snHi-C), but not bulk Hi-C. It is therefore unclear when and how embryonic chromatin conformations are assembled. Here, we investigated whether a mechanism of cohesin-dependent loop extrusion generates higher-order chromatin structures within the one-cell embryo. Using snHi-C of mouse knockout embryos, we demonstrate that the zygotic genome folds into loops and domains that critically depend on Scc1-cohesin and that are regulated in size and linear density by Wapl. Remarkably, we discovered distinct effects on maternal and paternal chromatin loop sizes, likely reflecting differences in loop extrusion dynamics and epigenetic reprogramming. Dynamic polymer models of chromosomes reproduce changes in snHi-C, suggesting a mechanism where cohesin locally compacts chromatin by active loop extrusion, whose processivity is controlled by Wapl. Our simulations and experimental data provide evidence that cohesin-dependent loop extrusion organizes mammalian genomes over multiple scales from the one-cell embryo onward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Gassler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Hugo B Brandão
- Harvard Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Maxim Imakaev
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ilya M Flyamer
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sabrina Ladstätter
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Wendy A Bickmore
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Leonid A Mirny
- Harvard Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kikuë Tachibana
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wutz G, Várnai C, Nagasaka K, Cisneros DA, Stocsits RR, Tang W, Schoenfelder S, Jessberger G, Muhar M, Hossain MJ, Walther N, Koch B, Kueblbeck M, Ellenberg J, Zuber J, Fraser P, Peters JM. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J 2017; 36:3573-3599. [PMID: 29217591 PMCID: PMC5730888 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201798004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 452] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammalian genomes are spatially organized into compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and loops to facilitate gene regulation and other chromosomal functions. How compartments, TADs, and loops are generated is unknown. It has been proposed that cohesin forms TADs and loops by extruding chromatin loops until it encounters CTCF, but direct evidence for this hypothesis is missing. Here, we show that cohesin suppresses compartments but is required for TADs and loops, that CTCF defines their boundaries, and that the cohesin unloading factor WAPL and its PDS5 binding partners control the length of loops. In the absence of WAPL and PDS5 proteins, cohesin forms extended loops, presumably by passing CTCF sites, accumulates in axial chromosomal positions (vermicelli), and condenses chromosomes. Unexpectedly, PDS5 proteins are also required for boundary function. These results show that cohesin has an essential genome-wide function in mediating long-range chromatin interactions and support the hypothesis that cohesin creates these by loop extrusion, until it is delayed by CTCF in a manner dependent on PDS5 proteins, or until it is released from DNA by WAPL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Csilla Várnai
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kota Nagasaka
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - David A Cisneros
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman R Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Wen Tang
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Schoenfelder
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gregor Jessberger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Muhar
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - M Julius Hossain
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nike Walther
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Koch
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Moritz Kueblbeck
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Ellenberg
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Zuber
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Fraser
- Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Overlack K, Bange T, Weissmann F, Faesen AC, Maffini S, Primorac I, Müller F, Peters JM, Musacchio A. BubR1 Promotes Bub3-Dependent APC/C Inhibition during Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling. Curr Biol 2017; 27:2915-2927.e7. [PMID: 28943088 PMCID: PMC5640511 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 07/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents premature sister chromatid separation during mitosis. Phosphorylation of unattached kinetochores by the Mps1 kinase promotes recruitment of SAC machinery that catalyzes assembly of the SAC effector mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). The SAC protein Bub3 is a phospho-amino acid adaptor that forms structurally related stable complexes with functionally distinct paralogs named Bub1 and BubR1. A short motif (“loop”) of Bub1, but not the equivalent loop of BubR1, enhances binding of Bub3 to kinetochore phospho-targets. Here, we asked whether the BubR1 loop directs Bub3 to different phospho-targets. The BubR1 loop is essential for SAC function and cannot be removed or replaced with the Bub1 loop. BubR1 loop mutants bind Bub3 and are normally incorporated in MCC in vitro but have reduced ability to inhibit the MCC target anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C), suggesting that BubR1:Bub3 recognition and inhibition of APC/C requires phosphorylation. Thus, small sequence differences in Bub1 and BubR1 direct Bub3 to different phosphorylated targets in the SAC signaling cascade. The molecular basis of kinetochore recruitment of Bub1 and BubR1 is dissected Bub1 and BubR1 modulate the ability of Bub3 to recognize phosphorylated targets A newly identified BubR1 motif targets Bub3 to the anaphase-promoting complex The newly identified motif of BubR1 is required for checkpoint signaling
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Overlack
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Tanja Bange
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Florian Weissmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Alex C Faesen
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Stefano Maffini
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Ivana Primorac
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Franziska Müller
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Musacchio
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany; Centre for Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstrasse, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
van der Lelij P, Lieb S, Jude J, Wutz G, Santos CP, Falkenberg K, Schlattl A, Ban J, Schwentner R, Hoffmann T, Kovar H, Real FX, Waldman T, Pearson MA, Kraut N, Peters JM, Zuber J, Petronczki M. Synthetic lethality between the cohesin subunits STAG1 and STAG2 in diverse cancer contexts. eLife 2017; 6:e26980. [PMID: 28691904 PMCID: PMC5531830 DOI: 10.7554/elife.26980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in the cohesin complex in a wide range of human cancers. Here we demonstrate that the most frequently mutated subunit of the cohesin complex, STAG2, displays a strong synthetic lethal interaction with its paralog STAG1. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of STAG2 mutated but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutated bladder cancer model alleviates the dependency on STAG1. Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 support sister chromatid cohesion to redundantly ensure cell survival. STAG1 represents a vulnerability of cancer cells carrying mutations in the major emerging tumor suppressor STAG2 across different cancer contexts. Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions to target recurrent cohesin mutations in cancer, e.g. by inhibiting STAG1, holds the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra van der Lelij
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Lieb
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julian Jude
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Catarina P Santos
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain
| | - Katrina Falkenberg
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jozef Ban
- Children’s Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Thomas Hoffmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinrich Kovar
- Children’s Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
- Department for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francisco X Real
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain
- Department de Ciències Experimentals I de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Todd Waldman
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States
| | | | - Norbert Kraut
- Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Zuber
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lelij PVD, Lieb S, Jude J, Wutz G, Pereira C, Falkenberg K, Ban J, Kovar H, Waldman T, Real F, Pearson M, Kraut N, Peters JM, Zuber J, Petronczki MP. Abstract 3452: The cohesin subunit STAG1 is a hardwired genetic dependency of STAG2 mutant cancer cells. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in subunits of the cohesin complex in human cancer. Cohesin is a chromosomal factor that is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and cell division and that contributes to gene regulation and DNA repair. Deleterious mutations in the cohesin subunit STAG2 have been detected in about 20% of bladder cancer, 15% of Ewing sarcoma and 6% of AML/MDS patients. The mechanistic involvement of cohesin mutations in the pathogenesis of human malignancies is currently under active investigation. We hypothesized that the loss of STAG2 could alter the properties and functionalities of the cohesin complex leading to unique vulnerabilities of STAG2 mutant cells. Using CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi in isogenic solid cancer and leukemic models we identified STAG1, a STAG2 paralog, as a strong and clean genetic vulnerability of STAG2 mutant cells. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion specifically in STAG2 mutant but not wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of disease relevant STAG2 mutant but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutant bladder cancer model alleviates the dependence on STAG1. Our results demonstrate that the cohesin subunits STAG1 and STAG2 act redundantly to support sister chromatid cohesion and cell viability in human cells. We have identified STAG1 as a hardwired, context independent vulnerability of STAG2 mutant cancers. Specific synthetic lethalities elicited by recurrent cohesin mutations in human tumors hold the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.
Citation Format: Petra Van Der Lelij, Simone Lieb, Julian Jude, Gordana Wutz, Catarina Pereira, Katrina Falkenberg, Jozef Ban, Heinrich Kovar, Todd Waldman, Francisco Real, Mark Pearson, Norbert Kraut, Jan-Michael Peters, Johannes Zuber, Mark P. Petronczki. The cohesin subunit STAG1 is a hardwired genetic dependency of STAG2 mutant cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3452. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3452
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julian Jude
- 1The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gordana Wutz
- 1The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Jozef Ban
- 4CCRI- Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinrich Kovar
- 4CCRI- Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Francisco Real
- 3CNIO: Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Johannes Zuber
- 1The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Busslinger GA, Stocsits RR, van der Lelij P, Axelsson E, Tedeschi A, Galjart N, Peters JM. Cohesin is positioned in mammalian genomes by transcription, CTCF and Wapl. Nature 2017; 544:503-507. [PMID: 28424523 PMCID: PMC6080695 DOI: 10.1038/nature22063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Mammalian genomes are spatially organized by CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin into chromatin loops and topologically associated domains, which have important roles in gene regulation and recombination. By binding to specific sequences, CTCF defines contact points for cohesin-mediated long-range chromosomal cis-interactions. Cohesin is also present at these sites, but has been proposed to be loaded onto DNA elsewhere and to extrude chromatin loops until it encounters CTCF bound to DNA. How cohesin is recruited to CTCF sites, according to this or other models, is unknown. Here we show that the distribution of cohesin in the mouse genome depends on transcription, CTCF and the cohesin release factor Wings apart-like (Wapl). In CTCF-depleted fibroblasts, cohesin cannot be properly recruited to CTCF sites but instead accumulates at transcription start sites of active genes, where the cohesin-loading complex is located. In the absence of both CTCF and Wapl, cohesin accumulates in up to 70 kilobase-long regions at 3'-ends of active genes, in particular if these converge on each other. Changing gene expression modulates the position of these 'cohesin islands'. These findings indicate that transcription can relocate mammalian cohesin over long distances on DNA, as previously reported for yeast cohesin, that this translocation contributes to positioning cohesin at CTCF sites, and that active genes can be freed from cohesin either by transcription-mediated translocation or by Wapl-mediated release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg A. Busslinger
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman R. Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Petra van der Lelij
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Elin Axelsson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Tedeschi
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Niels Galjart
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Davidson IF, Goetz D, Zaczek MP, Molodtsov MI, Huis In 't Veld PJ, Weissmann F, Litos G, Cisneros DA, Ocampo-Hafalla M, Ladurner R, Uhlmann F, Vaziri A, Peters JM. Rapid movement and transcriptional re-localization of human cohesin on DNA. EMBO J 2016; 35:2671-2685. [PMID: 27799150 PMCID: PMC5167347 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The spatial organization, correct expression, repair, and segregation of eukaryotic genomes depend on cohesin, ring-shaped protein complexes that are thought to function by entrapping DNA It has been proposed that cohesin is recruited to specific genomic locations from distal loading sites by an unknown mechanism, which depends on transcription, and it has been speculated that cohesin movements along DNA could create three-dimensional genomic organization by loop extrusion. However, whether cohesin can translocate along DNA is unknown. Here, we used single-molecule imaging to show that cohesin can diffuse rapidly on DNA in a manner consistent with topological entrapment and can pass over some DNA-bound proteins and nucleosomes but is constrained in its movement by transcription and DNA-bound CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). These results indicate that cohesin can be positioned in the genome by moving along DNA, that transcription can provide directionality to these movements, that CTCF functions as a boundary element for moving cohesin, and they are consistent with the hypothesis that cohesin spatially organizes the genome via loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Goetz
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | - Maciej P Zaczek
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | - Maxim I Molodtsov
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
- Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Gabriele Litos
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | - David A Cisneros
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Rene Ladurner
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Alipasha Vaziri
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna, Austria
- Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Brown NG, VanderLinden R, Watson ER, Weissmann F, Ordureau A, Wu KP, Zhang W, Yu S, Mercredi PY, Harrison JS, Davidson IF, Qiao R, Lu Y, Dube P, Brunner MR, Grace CRR, Miller DJ, Haselbach D, Jarvis MA, Yamaguchi M, Yanishevski D, Petzold G, Sidhu SS, Kuhlman B, Kirschner MW, Harper JW, Peters JM, Stark H, Schulman BA. Dual RING E3 Architectures Regulate Multiubiquitination and Ubiquitin Chain Elongation by APC/C. Cell 2016; 165:1440-1453. [PMID: 27259151 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Revised: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Protein ubiquitination involves E1, E2, and E3 trienzyme cascades. E2 and RING E3 enzymes often collaborate to first prime a substrate with a single ubiquitin (UB) and then achieve different forms of polyubiquitination: multiubiquitination of several sites and elongation of linkage-specific UB chains. Here, cryo-EM and biochemistry show that the human E3 anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and its two partner E2s, UBE2C (aka UBCH10) and UBE2S, adopt specialized catalytic architectures for these two distinct forms of polyubiquitination. The APC/C RING constrains UBE2C proximal to a substrate and simultaneously binds a substrate-linked UB to drive processive multiubiquitination. Alternatively, during UB chain elongation, the RING does not bind UBE2S but rather lures an evolving substrate-linked UB to UBE2S positioned through a cullin interaction to generate a Lys11-linked chain. Our findings define mechanisms of APC/C regulation, and establish principles by which specialized E3-E2-substrate-UB architectures control different forms of polyubiquitination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Brown
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Ryan VanderLinden
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Edmond R Watson
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Florian Weissmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Alban Ordureau
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kuen-Phon Wu
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Wei Zhang
- Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S3E1, Canada
| | - Shanshan Yu
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Peter Y Mercredi
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Joseph S Harrison
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Iain F Davidson
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Renping Qiao
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Ying Lu
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Prakash Dube
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael R Brunner
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Christy R R Grace
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Darcie J Miller
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - David Haselbach
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marc A Jarvis
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Masaya Yamaguchi
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - David Yanishevski
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Georg Petzold
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sachdev S Sidhu
- Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S3E1, Canada
| | - Brian Kuhlman
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Marc W Kirschner
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - J Wade Harper
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Holger Stark
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Brenda A Schulman
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kaye HL, Peters JM, Gersner R, Chamberland M, Sansevere A, Rotenberg A. Neurophysiological evidence of preserved connectivity in tuber tissue. Epilepsy Behav Case Rep 2016; 7:64-68. [PMID: 28616385 PMCID: PMC5459951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebcr.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We present a case of preserved corticospinal connectivity in a cortical tuber, in a 10 year-old boy with intractable epilepsy and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The patient had multiple subcortical tubers, one of which was located in the right central sulcus. In preparation for epilepsy surgery, motor mapping, by neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) coupled with surface electromyography (EMG) was performed to locate the primary motor cortical areas. The resulting functional motor map revealed expected corticospinal connectivity in the left precentral gyrus. Surprisingly, robust contralateral deltoid and tibialis anterior motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were also elicited with direct stimulation of the cortical tuber in the right central sulcus. MRI with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography confirmed corticospinal fibers originating in the tuber. As there are no current reports of preserved connectivity between a cortical tuber and the corticospinal tract, this case serves to highlight the functional interdigitation of tuber and eloquent cortex. Our case also illustrates the widening spectrum of neuropathological abnormality in TSC that is becoming apparent with modern MRI methodology. Finally, our finding underscores the need for further study of preserved function in tuber tissue during presurgical workup in patients with TSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HL Kaye
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Neuromodulation Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- The F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - JM Peters
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- The F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - R Gersner
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Neuromodulation Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - M Chamberland
- Computational Radiology Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab, Computer Science Department, Faculty of Science, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - A Sansevere
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - A Rotenberg
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Neuromodulation Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- The F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hons MT, Huis in ‘t Veld PJ, Kaesler J, Rombaut P, Schleiffer A, Herzog F, Stark H, Peters JM. Topology and structure of an engineered human cohesin complex bound to Pds5B. Nat Commun 2016; 7:12523. [PMID: 27549742 PMCID: PMC4996973 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The cohesin subunits Smc1, Smc3 and Scc1 form large tripartite rings which mediate sister chromatid cohesion and chromatin structure. These are thought to entrap DNA with the help of the associated proteins SA1/2 and Pds5A/B. Structural information is available for parts of cohesin, but analyses of entire cohesin complexes are limited by their flexibility. Here we generated a more rigid 'bonsai' cohesin by truncating the coiled coils of Smc1 and Smc3 and used single-particle electron microscopy, chemical crosslinking-mass spectrometry and in silico modelling to generate three-dimensional models of cohesin bound to Pds5B. The HEAT-repeat protein Pds5B forms a curved structure around the nucleotide-binding domains of Smc1 and Smc3 and bridges the Smc3-Scc1 and SA1-Scc1 interfaces. These results indicate that Pds5B forms an integral part of the cohesin ring by contacting all other cohesin subunits, a property that may reflect the complex role of Pds5 proteins in controlling cohesin-DNA interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Hons
- Department of Structural Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, Göttingen 37077, Germany
| | | | - Jan Kaesler
- Department of Structural Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, Göttingen 37077, Germany
| | - Pascaline Rombaut
- Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 25, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Alexander Schleiffer
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, Vienna 1030, Austria
| | - Franz Herzog
- Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 25, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Holger Stark
- Department of Structural Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, Göttingen 37077, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, Vienna 1030, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yamaguchi M, VanderLinden R, Weissmann F, Qiao R, Dube P, Brown NG, Haselbach D, Zhang W, Sidhu SS, Peters JM, Stark H, Schulman BA. Cryo-EM of Mitotic Checkpoint Complex-Bound APC/C Reveals Reciprocal and Conformational Regulation of Ubiquitin Ligation. Mol Cell 2016; 63:593-607. [PMID: 27522463 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Revised: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) coordinates proper chromosome biorientation on the spindle with ubiquitination activities of CDC20-activated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C(CDC20)). APC/C(CDC20) and two E2s, UBE2C and UBE2S, catalyze ubiquitination through distinct architectures for linking ubiquitin (UB) to substrates and elongating polyUB chains, respectively. MCC, which contains a second molecule of CDC20, blocks APC/C(CDC20)-UBE2C-dependent ubiquitination of Securin and Cyclins, while differentially determining or inhibiting CDC20 ubiquitination to regulate spindle surveillance, checkpoint activation, and checkpoint termination. Here electron microscopy reveals conformational variation of APC/C(CDC20)-MCC underlying this multifaceted regulation. MCC binds APC/C-bound CDC20 to inhibit substrate access. However, rotation about the CDC20-MCC assembly and conformational variability of APC/C modulate UBE2C-catalyzed ubiquitination of MCC's CDC20 molecule. Access of UBE2C is limiting for subsequent polyubiquitination by UBE2S. We propose that conformational dynamics of APC/C(CDC20)-MCC modulate E2 activation and determine distinctive ubiquitination activities as part of a response mechanism ensuring accurate sister chromatid segregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaya Yamaguchi
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Ryan VanderLinden
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Florian Weissmann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Renping Qiao
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Prakash Dube
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nicholas G Brown
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - David Haselbach
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wei Zhang
- Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3E1, Canada
| | - Sachdev S Sidhu
- Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3E1, Canada
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Holger Stark
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Brenda A Schulman
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Isokane M, Walter T, Mahen R, Nijmeijer B, Hériché JK, Miura K, Maffini S, Ivanov MP, Kitajima TS, Peters JM, Ellenberg J. ARHGEF17 is an essential spindle assembly checkpoint factor that targets Mps1 to kinetochores. J Cell Biol 2016; 212:647-59. [PMID: 26953350 PMCID: PMC4792069 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201408089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures genome stability during cell division. Here, a new essential SAC factor, ARHGEF17, is characterized by quantitative imaging, biochemical, and biophysical experiments, which show that it targets the checkpoint kinase Mps1 to kinetochores. To prevent genome instability, mitotic exit is delayed until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). In this study, we characterized the function of ARHGEF17, identified in a genome-wide RNA interference screen for human mitosis genes. Through a series of quantitative imaging, biochemical, and biophysical experiments, we showed that ARHGEF17 is essential for SAC activity, because it is the major targeting factor that controls localization of the checkpoint kinase Mps1 to the kinetochore. This mitotic function is mediated by direct interaction of the central domain of ARHGEF17 with Mps1, which is autoregulated by the activity of Mps1 kinase, for which ARHGEF17 is a substrate. This mitosis-specific role is independent of ARHGEF17’s RhoGEF activity in interphase. Our study thus assigns a new mitotic function to ARHGEF17 and reveals the molecular mechanism for a key step in SAC establishment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayumi Isokane
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Walter
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Mahen
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bianca Nijmeijer
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jean-Karim Hériché
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kota Miura
- Centre for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefano Maffini
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Miroslav Penchev Ivanov
- Molecular and Cellular Biology, Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Tomoya S Kitajima
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Molecular and Cellular Biology, Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan Ellenberg
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|