1
|
Specker E, Forster M, Brinkmann H, Boddy J, Immelmann B, Goller J, Pelowski M, Rosenberg R, Leder H. Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artworks. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232083. [PMID: 32401777 PMCID: PMC7219710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The idea that simple visual elements such as colors and lines have specific, universal associations-for example red being warm-appears rather intuitive. Such associations have formed a basis for the description of artworks since the 18th century and are still fundamental to discourses on art today. Art historians might describe a painting where red is dominant as "warm," "aggressive," or "lively," with the tacit assumption that beholders would universally associate the works' certain key forms with specific qualities, or "aesthetic effects". However, is this actually the case? Do we actually share similar responses to the same line or color? In this paper, we tested whether and to what extent this assumption of universality (sharing of perceived qualities) is justified. We employed-for the first time-abstract artworks as well as single elements (lines and colors) extracted from these artworks in an experiment in which participants rated the stimuli on 14 "aesthetic effect" scales derived from art literature and empirical aesthetics. To test the validity of the assumption of universality, we examined on which of the dimensions there was agreement, and investigated the influence of art expertise, comparing art historians with lay people. In one study and its replication, we found significantly lower agreement than expected. For the whole artworks, participants agreed on the effects of warm-cold, heavy-light, and happy-sad, but not on 11 other dimensions. Further, we found that the image type (artwork or its constituting elements) was a major factor influencing agreement; people agreed more on the whole artwork than on single elements. Art expertise did not play a significant role and agreement was especially low on dimensions usually of interest in empirical aesthetics (e.g., like-dislike). Our results challenge the practice of interpreting artworks based on their aesthetic effects, as these effects may not be as universal as previously thought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Specker
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies, Department of Art History, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- * E-mail:
| | - Michael Forster
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hanna Brinkmann
- Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies, Department of Art History, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jane Boddy
- Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies, Department of Art History, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Beatrice Immelmann
- Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies, Department of Art History, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jürgen Goller
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthew Pelowski
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raphael Rosenberg
- Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies, Department of Art History, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- MECS, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Helmut Leder
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Su C, Tripathi M, Yan QB, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Hofer C, Wang H, Basile L, Su G, Dong M, Meyer JC, Kotakoski J, Kong J, Idrobo JC, Susi T, Li J. Engineering single-atom dynamics with electron irradiation. Sci Adv 2019; 5:eaav2252. [PMID: 31114798 PMCID: PMC6524980 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Atomic engineering is envisioned to involve selectively inducing the desired dynamics of single atoms and combining these steps for larger-scale assemblies. Here, we focus on the first part by surveying the single-step dynamics of graphene dopants, primarily phosphorus, caused by electron irradiation both in experiment and simulation, and develop a theory for describing the probabilities of competing configurational outcomes depending on the postcollision momentum vector of the primary knock-on atom. The predicted branching ratio of configurational transformations agrees well with our atomically resolved experiments. This suggests a way for biasing the dynamics toward desired outcomes, paving the road for designing and further upscaling atomic engineering using electron irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Su
- Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Research Lab of Electronics (RLE), Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Mukesh Tripathi
- University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Qing-Bo Yan
- College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Zegao Wang
- Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNano), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
| | - Zihan Zhang
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Christoph Hofer
- University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Haozhe Wang
- Research Lab of Electronics (RLE), Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Leonardo Basile
- Department of Physics, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, Ecuador
| | - Gang Su
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- Kavli Institute for Theoretical Sciences, and CAS Center of Excellence in Topological Quantum Computation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Mingdong Dong
- Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNano), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Jannik C. Meyer
- University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Jani Kotakoski
- University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Jing Kong
- Research Lab of Electronics (RLE), Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Juan-Carlos Idrobo
- Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
| | - Toma Susi
- University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Ju Li
- Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stanyte R, Nuebler J, Blaukopf C, Hoefler R, Stocsits R, Peters JM, Gerlich DW. Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression. J Cell Biol 2018; 217:1985-2004. [PMID: 29695489 PMCID: PMC5987726 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201801157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Faithful genome transmission in dividing cells requires that the two copies of each chromosome's DNA package into separate but physically linked sister chromatids. The linkage between sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin, yet where sister chromatids are linked and how they resolve during cell cycle progression has remained unclear. In this study, we investigated sister chromatid organization in live human cells using dCas9-mEGFP labeling of endogenous genomic loci. We detected substantial sister locus separation during G2 phase irrespective of the proximity to cohesin enrichment sites. Almost all sister loci separated within a few hours after their respective replication and then rapidly equilibrated their average distances within dynamic chromatin polymers. Our findings explain why the topology of sister chromatid resolution in G2 largely reflects the DNA replication program. Furthermore, these data suggest that cohesin enrichment sites are not persistent cohesive sites in human cells. Rather, cohesion might occur at variable genomic positions within the cell population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rugile Stanyte
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Nuebler
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Claudia Blaukopf
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolf Hoefler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Stocsits
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel W Gerlich
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|