Coping with and recovering from hydroxyurea-induced replication fork arrest in budding yeast

Checkpoint Activation of an Unconventional DNA Replication Program in Tetrahymena

The intra-S phase checkpoint kinase of metazoa and yeast, ATR/MEC1, protects chromosomes from DNA damage and replication stress by phosphorylating subunits of the replicative helicase, MCM2-7. Here we describe an unprecedented ATR-dependent pathway in Tetrahymena thermophila in which the essential pre-replicative complex proteins, Orc1p, Orc2p and Mcm6p are degraded in hydroxyurea-treated S phase cells. Chromosomes undergo global changes during HU-arrest, including phosphorylation of histone H2A.X, deacetylation of histone H3, and an apparent diminution in DNA content that can be blocked by the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate. Most remarkably, the cell cycle rapidly resumes upon hydroxyurea removal, and the entire genome is replicated prior to replenishment of ORC and MCMs. While stalled replication forks are elongated under these conditions, DNA fiber imaging revealed that most replicating molecules are produced by new initiation events. Furthermore, the sole origin in the ribosomal DNA minichromosome is inactive and replication appears to initiate near the rRNA promoter. The collective data raise the possibility that replication initiation occurs by an ORC-independent mechanism during the recovery from HU-induced replication stress.

DNA damage and replication stress activate cell cycle checkpoint responses that protect the integrity of eukaryotic chromosomes. A well-conserved response involves the reversible phosphorylation of the replicative helicase, MCM2-7, which together with the origin recognition complex (ORC) dictates when and where replication initiates in chromosomes. The central role of ORC and MCMs in DNA replication is illustrated by the fact that small changes in abundance of these pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) components are poorly tolerated from yeast to humans. Here we describe an unprecedented replication stress checkpoint response in the early branching eukaryote, Tetrahymena thermophila, that is triggered by the depletion of dNTP pools with hydroxyurea (HU). Instead of transiently phosphorylating MCM subunits, ORC and MCM proteins are physically degraded in HU-treated Tetrahymena. Unexpectedly, upon HU removal the genome is completely and effortlessly replicated prior to replenishment of ORC and MCM components. Using DNA fiber imaging and 2D gel electrophoresis, we show that ORC-dependent mechanisms are bypassed during the recovery phase to produce bidirectional replication forks throughout the genome. Our findings suggest that Tetrahymena enlists an alternative mechanism for replication initiation, and that the underlying process can operate on a genome-wide scale.

Temporal regulation of the Mus81-Mms4 endonuclease ensures cell survival under conditions of DNA damage

The structure-specific Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 endonuclease contributes importantly to DNA repair and genome integrity maintenance. Here, using budding yeast, we have studied its function and regulation during the cellular response to DNA damage and show that this endonuclease is necessary for successful chromosome replication and cell survival in the presence of DNA lesions that interfere with replication fork progression. On the contrary, Mus81-Mms4 is not required for coping with replicative stress originated by acute treatment with hydroxyurea (HU), which causes fork stalling. Despite its requirement for dealing with DNA lesions that hinder DNA replication, Mus81-Mms4 activation is not induced by DNA damage at replication forks. Full Mus81-Mms4 activity is only acquired when cells finish S-phase and the endonuclease executes its function after the bulk of genome replication is completed. This post-replicative mode of action of Mus81-Mms4 limits its nucleolytic activity during S-phase, thus avoiding the potential cleavage of DNA substrates that could cause genomic instability during DNA replication. At the same time, it constitutes an efficient fail-safe mechanism for processing DNA intermediates that cannot be resolved by other proteins and persist after bulk DNA synthesis, which guarantees the completion of DNA repair and faithful chromosome replication when the DNA is damaged.

DNA interstrand crosslink repair in mammalian cells

DNA damage by agents crosslinking the strands presents a formidable challenge to the cell to repair for survival and to repair accurately for maintenance of genetic information. It appears that repair of DNA crosslinks occurs in a path involving double strand breaks (DSBs) in the DNA. Mammalian cells have multiple systems involved in the repair response to such damage, including the Fanconi anemia pathway that appears to be directly involved, although the mechanisms and site of action remain elusive. A particular finding relating to deficiency of the Fanconi anemia pathway is the observation of chromosomal radial formations after ICL damage. The basis of formation of such chromosomal aberrations is unknown although they appear secondarily to DSBs. Here we review the processes involved in response to DNA interstrand crosslinks which might lead to radial formation and the role of the nucleotide excision repair gene, ERCC1, which is required for a normal response, not just to DNA crosslinks, but also for DSBs at collapsed replication forks caused by substrate depletion.

Deletion of MAG1 and MRE11 enhances the sensitivity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HUG1P-GFP promoter-reporter construct to genotoxicity

Eukaryotic yeast-based DNA damage cellular sensors offer many advantages to traditional prokaryotic-based mutagenicity assays. The HUG1P-GFP promoter-reporter construct has proven to be an effective method to selectively screen for multiple types of DNA damage. To enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of the system to different types of DNA damage, two genes involved in distinct DNA damage responses were deleted. Deletion of MAG1, a gene encoding a DNA glycosylase and member of the base excision repair (BER) pathway, increased the biosensor's sensitivity to the alkylating agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (lowering the sensitivity threshold to 0.0001% (v/v)) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). Deletion of MRE11, part of the highly conserved RMX complex that aids in sensing and repairing double strand breaks in budding yeasts, enhanced sensitivity to gamma radiation (gamma-ray) (detection threshold of 50Gy) and camptothecin. The mre11Delta phenotype dominated in mag1Deltamre11Delta strains. Through the deletions, we were able to engineer increased selectivity to alkylating agents, gamma-ray, and camptothecin, since increased sensitivity to one type of damage did not alter the quantitative response to other genotoxins. The enhancements to the HUG1P-GFP system did not affect its ability to detect several other DNA damaging agents, including 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine (SDMH), phleomycin, and hydroxyurea (HU), or affect its lack of response to the potentially non-genotoxic carcinogen formaldehyde.

Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HR). HR requires nucleolytic degradation of 5' DNA ends to generate tracts of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which are also important for the activation of DNA damage checkpoints. Here we describe a quantitative analysis of DSB processing in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that resection of an HO endonuclease-induced DSB is less extensive than previously estimated and provide evidence for significant instability of the 3' ssDNA tails. We show that both DSB resection and checkpoint activation are dose-dependent, especially during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. During G1, processing near the break is inhibited by competition with NHEJ, but extensive resection is regulated by an NHEJ-independent mechanism. DSB processing and checkpoint activation are more efficient in G2/M than in G1 phase, but are most efficient at breaks encountered by DNA replication forks during S phase. Our findings identify unexpected complexity of DSB processing and its regulation, and provide a framework for further mechanistic insights.

New insights into cell cycle control from the Drosophila endocycle

During metazoan development, the organization of the cell cycle is often modified in response to developmental signals. The endocycle provides a dramatic example of this phenomenon. In the endocycle, also referred to as the endoreplicative cycle, cells undergo successive rounds of DNA replication without an intervening mitosis. Often the endocycle is used to expand the genome of a group of specialized cells that are highly biosynthetically active. In these circumstances, large polyploid cells are produced in organisms that are primarily comprised of diploid cells. However, many organisms achieve growth by increasing cell size, rather than cell number. This strategy is more generally exploited in insects and plants. For instance, in the insect Drosophila melanogaster, the majority of the larval tissues, as well as many adult tissues, enter the endocycle and become polyploid. Therefore, Drosophila has been a rich source for studies on endocycle regulation. Recent work from Drosophila is beginning to reveal how developmental signals promote the transition from the mitotic cycle to the endocycle, as well as what drives endocycle progression. In addition, studies on the endocycle have provided insight into the regulatory principles underlying the once per cell cycle replication of the genome, as well as the relationship between S phase and mitosis.

A postsynaptic role for Rhp55/57 that is responsible for cell death in Deltarqh1 mutants following replication arrest in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Following replication arrest, multiple cellular responses are triggered to maintain genomic integrity. In fission yeast, the RecQ helicase, Rqh1, plays a critical role in this process. This is demonstrated in Deltarqh1 cells that, following treatment with hydroxyurea (HU), undergo an aberrant mitosis leading to cell death. Previous data suggest that Rqh1 functions with homologous recombination (HR) in recovery from replication arrest. We have found that loss of the HR genes rhp55(+) or rhp57(+), but not rhp51(+) or rhp54(+), suppresses the HU sensitivity of Deltarqh1 cells. Much of this suppression requires Rhp51 and Rhp54. In addition, this suppression is partially dependent on swi5(+). In budding yeast, overexpressing Rad51 (the Rhp51 homolog) minimized the need for Rad55/57 (Rhp55/57) in nucleoprotein filament formation. We overexpressed Rhp51 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and found that it greatly reduced the requirement for Rhp55/57 in recovery from DNA damage. However, overexpressing Rhp51 did not change the Deltarhp55 suppression of the HU sensitivity of Deltarqh1, supporting an Rhp55/57 function during HR independent of nucleoprotein filament formation. These results are consistent with Rqh1 playing a role late in HR following replication arrest and provide evidence for a postsynaptic function for Rhp55/57.

A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response

The checkpoint proteins Rad53 and Mec1-Ddc2 regulate many aspects of cell metabolism in response to DNA damage. We have examined the relative importance of downstream checkpoint effectors on cell viability. Checkpoint regulation of mitosis, gene expression, and late origin firing make only modest contributions to viability. By contrast, the checkpoint is essential for preventing irreversible breakdown of stalled replication forks. Moreover, recruitment of Ddc2 to nuclear foci and subsequent activation of the Rad53 kinase only occur during S phase and require the assembly of replication forks. Thus, DNA replication forks are both activators and primary effectors of the checkpoint pathway in S phase.