3
|
Brocklehurst S, Watson M, Carr IM, Out S, Heidmann I, Meyer P. Induction of epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis by over-expression of DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1 (MET1). PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192170. [PMID: 29466369 PMCID: PMC5821449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and histone modification can vary among plant accessions creating epi-alleles with different levels of expression competence. Mutations in epigenetic pathway functions are powerful tools to induce epigenetic variation. As an alternative approach, we investigated the potential of over-expressing an epigenetic function, using DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1 (MET1) for proof-of-concept. In Arabidopsis thaliana, MET1 controls maintenance of cytosine methylation at symmetrical CG positions. At some loci, which contain dense DNA methylation in CG- and non-CG context, loss of MET1 causes joint loss of all cytosines methylation marks. We find that over-expression of both catalytically active and inactive versions of MET1 stochastically generates new epi-alleles at loci encoding transposable elements, non-coding RNAs and proteins, which results for most loci in an increase in expression. Individual transformants share some common phenotypes and genes with altered gene expression. Altered expression states can be transmitted to the next generation, which does not require the continuous presence of the MET1 transgene. Long-term stability and epigenetic features differ for individual loci. Our data show that over-expression of MET1, and potentially of other genes encoding epigenetic factors, offers an alternative strategy to identify epigenetic target genes and to create novel epi-alleles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Watson
- Center for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ian M. Carr
- School of Medicine Institute of Biomed. & Clin. Sciences (LIBACS), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Suzan Out
- Enza Zaden Research and Development B.V., Enkhuizen, NL
| | - Iris Heidmann
- Enza Zaden Research and Development B.V., Enkhuizen, NL
| | - Peter Meyer
- Center for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lambing C, Heckmann S. Tackling Plant Meiosis: From Model Research to Crop Improvement. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2018; 9:829. [PMID: 29971082 PMCID: PMC6018109 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Genetic engineering and traditional plant breeding, which harnesses the natural genetic variation that arises during meiosis, will have key roles to improve crop varieties and thus deliver Food Security in the future. Meiosis, a specialized cell division producing haploid gametes to maintain somatic diploidy following their fusion, assures genetic variation by regulated genetic exchange through homologous recombination. However, meiotic recombination events are restricted in their total number and their distribution along chromosomes limiting allelic variations in breeding programs. Thus, modifying the number and distribution of meiotic recombination events has great potential to improve and accelerate plant breeding. In recent years much progress has been made in understanding meiotic progression and recombination in plants. Many genes and factors involved in these processes have been identified primarily in Arabidopsis thaliana but also more recently in crops such as Brassica, rice, barley, maize, or wheat. These advances put researchers in the position to translate acquired knowledge to various crops likely improving and accelerating breeding programs. However, although fundamental aspects of meiotic progression and recombination are conserved between species, differences in genome size and organization (due to repetitive DNA content and ploidy level) exist, particularly among plants, that likely account for differences in meiotic progression and recombination patterns found between species. Thus, tools and approaches are needed to better understand differences and similarities in meiotic progression and recombination among plants, to study fundamental aspects of meiosis in a variety of plants including crops and non-model species, and to transfer knowledge into crop species. In this article, we provide an overview of tools and approaches available to study plant meiosis, highlight new techniques, give examples of areas of future research and review distinct aspects of meiosis in non-model species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Lambing
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Christophe Lambing, Stefan Heckmann,
| | - Stefan Heckmann
- Independent Research Group Meiosis, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christophe Lambing, Stefan Heckmann,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richards CL, Alonso C, Becker C, Bossdorf O, Bucher E, Colomé-Tatché M, Durka W, Engelhardt J, Gaspar B, Gogol-Döring A, Grosse I, van Gurp TP, Heer K, Kronholm I, Lampei C, Latzel V, Mirouze M, Opgenoorth L, Paun O, Prohaska SJ, Rensing SA, Stadler PF, Trucchi E, Ullrich K, Verhoeven KJF. Ecological plant epigenetics: Evidence from model and non-model species, and the way forward. Ecol Lett 2017; 20:1576-1590. [PMID: 29027325 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Growing evidence shows that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to complex traits, with implications across many fields of biology. In plant ecology, recent studies have attempted to merge ecological experiments with epigenetic analyses to elucidate the contribution of epigenetics to plant phenotypes, stress responses, adaptation to habitat, and range distributions. While there has been some progress in revealing the role of epigenetics in ecological processes, studies with non-model species have so far been limited to describing broad patterns based on anonymous markers of DNA methylation. In contrast, studies with model species have benefited from powerful genomic resources, which contribute to a more mechanistic understanding but have limited ecological realism. Understanding the significance of epigenetics for plant ecology requires increased transfer of knowledge and methods from model species research to genomes of evolutionarily divergent species, and examination of responses to complex natural environments at a more mechanistic level. This requires transforming genomics tools specifically for studying non-model species, which is challenging given the large and often polyploid genomes of plants. Collaboration among molecular geneticists, ecologists and bioinformaticians promises to enhance our understanding of the mutual links between genome function and ecological processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Richards
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA
| | | | - Claude Becker
- Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, 1030, Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Austria
| | - Oliver Bossdorf
- Plant Evolutionary Ecology, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Etienne Bucher
- Institut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences, 49071, Beaucouzé Cedex, France
| | - Maria Colomé-Tatché
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Walter Durka
- Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, 06120, Halle, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jan Engelhardt
- Institut für Informatik, University of Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bence Gaspar
- Plant Evolutionary Ecology, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Gogol-Döring
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Computer Science, University of Halle, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Ivo Grosse
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Computer Science, University of Halle, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Thomas P van Gurp
- Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katrin Heer
- Conservation Biology, Philipps-University of Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ilkka Kronholm
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Center of Excellence in Biological Interactions, University of Jyväskylä, 40014, Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finland
| | - Christian Lampei
- Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Vít Latzel
- Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25243, Průhonice, Czech Republic
| | - Marie Mirouze
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire Génome et Développement des Plantes, 66860, Perpignan, France
| | - Lars Opgenoorth
- Department of Ecology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ovidiu Paun
- Plant Ecological Genomics, University of Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sonja J Prohaska
- Institut für Informatik, University of Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.,The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe NM, 87501, USA
| | - Stefan A Rensing
- Plant Cell Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.,BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter F Stadler
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institut für Informatik, University of Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.,The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe NM, 87501, USA.,Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Emiliano Trucchi
- Plant Ecological Genomics, University of Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kristian Ullrich
- Plant Cell Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany
| | - Koen J F Verhoeven
- Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Watson M, Hawkes E, Meyer P. Transmission of epi-alleles with MET1-dependent dense methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105338. [PMID: 25137154 PMCID: PMC4138171 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA methylation in plants targets cytosines in three sequence contexts, CG, CHG and CHH (H representing A, C or T). Each of these patterns has traditionally been associated with distinct DNA methylation pathways with CHH methylation being controlled by the RNA dependent DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway employing small RNAs as a guide for the de novo DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE (DRM2), and maintenance DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1 (MET1) being responsible for faithful propagation of CG methylation. Here we report an unusual 'dense methylation' pattern under the control of MET1, with methylation in all three sequence contexts. We identified epi-alleles of dense methylation at a non coding RNA locus (At4g15242) in Arabidopsis ecotypes, with distinct dense methylation and expression characteristics, which are stably maintained and transmitted in genetic crosses and which can be heritably altered by depletion of MET1. This suggests that, in addition to its classical CG maintenance function, at certain loci MET1 plays a role in creating transcriptional diversity based on the generation of independent epi-alleles. Database inspection identified several other loci with MET1-dependent dense methylation patterns. Arabidopsis ecotypes contain distinct epi-alleles of these loci with expression patterns that inversely correlate with methylation density, predominantly within the transcribed region. In Arabidopsis, dense methylation appears to be an exception as it is only found at a small number of loci. Its presence does, however, highlight the potential for MET1 as a contributor to epigenetic diversity, and it will be interesting to investigate the representation of dense methylation in other plant species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Watson
- Center for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Hawkes
- Center for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Meyer
- Center for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|