1
|
Sakellis C, Jacene HA. Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostics. PET Clin 2024; 19:325-339. [PMID: 38714399 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells. NEN are ideally suited for a theragnostic approach due to their specific expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR). SSTR imaging of NEN dates back to the 1980s, but has evolved recently due to the introduction of more sensitive SSTR PET radiotracers. SSTR PET is a primary imaging modality for identifying NEN and characterizing SSTR expression. SSTR PET is complementary to anatomic imaging for assessing tumor response to treatment. SSTR PET is mandated to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Here, the role of imaging to aid management of NEN is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Sakellis
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, DL198, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Heather A Jacene
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, DL198, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Blake M, Anderson M, Mojtahed A, Bradley W, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Qadan M, Ferrone C, Clark J, Ambrosini V, Picchio M, Mapelli P, Evangelista L, Leithner D, Nikolaou K, Ursprung S, Fanti S, Vanzulli A, Catalano OA. Advancements in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Imaging and Future Frontiers. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3281. [PMID: 38892992 PMCID: PMC11172657 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of tumors with varying clinical behaviors. Their incidence has risen due to increased awareness, improved diagnostics, and aging populations. The 2019 World Health Organization classification emphasizes integrating radiology and histopathology to characterize NENs and create personalized treatment plans. Imaging methods like CT, MRI, and PET/CT are crucial for detection, staging, treatment planning, and monitoring, but each of them poses different interpretative challenges and none are immune to pitfalls. Treatment options include surgery, targeted therapies, and chemotherapy, based on the tumor type, stage, and patient-specific factors. This review aims to provide insights into the latest developments and challenges in NEN imaging, diagnosis, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Asmundo
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Francesco Rizzetto
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Michael Blake
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Mark Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - William Bradley
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| | - Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (C.F.-d.C.); (M.Q.)
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (C.F.-d.C.); (M.Q.)
| | - Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
| | - Jeffrey Clark
- Department of Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy;
| | - Doris Leithner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (K.N.); (S.U.)
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (K.N.); (S.U.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (M.B.); (M.A.); (A.M.); (W.B.); (A.S.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ebner R, Rübenthaler J, Ricke J, Sheikh GT, Unterrainer LM, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Brendel M, Schmid-Tannwald C, Cyran CC. [Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract : Value of (hybrid) imaging diagnostics in radiology]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024:10.1007/s00117-024-01296-y. [PMID: 38713221 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01296-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that predominantly arise in the gastrointestinal tract. At the time of initial diagnosis, the NET has already spread locoregionally in about half of the patients, and 27% of patients have already developed distant metastases. Since this plays a crucial role in therapy planning, accurate diagnostic imaging is important. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Due to its high temporal and spatial resolution (multiphasic including arterial phase), computed tomography (CT) plays a decisive role in primary staging and follow-up care, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its excellent soft tissue contrast offers advantages in the assessment of parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET) provides additional functional information that not only helps to detect the primary tumor and distant metastases, but also has a significant influence on therapeutic management in a theranostic approach. PERFORMANCE Hybrid imaging using SSR-PET/CT has proven to be particularly effective in the detection of NET. Compared to conventional imaging, it provides additional information in 68% of patients, which has a significant impact on clinical management. ACHIEVEMENTS Imaging of NET requires the combined use of various methods such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT to enable accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS SSR-PET/CT is a valuable tool for the accurate staging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially with small metastases, while MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent and diffusion-weighted imaging is useful for the specific assessment of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ebner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - J Rübenthaler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - J Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - G T Sheikh
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - L M Unterrainer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C J Auernhammer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C Spitzweg
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - M Brendel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| | - C Schmid-Tannwald
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - C C Cyran
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Gastroenteropankreatischen Systems (GEPNET-KUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hesami M, Blake M, Anderson MA, Asmundo L, Kilcoyne A, Najmi Z, Caravan PD, Catana C, Czawlytko C, Abdar Esfahani S, Kambadakone AR, Samir A, McDermott S, Domachevsky L, Ursprung S, Catalano OA. Diagnostic Anatomic Imaging for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Maximizing Strengths and Mitigating Weaknesses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024:00004728-990000000-00316. [PMID: 38657156 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of gastrointestinal and lung tumors. Their diverse clinical manifestations, variable locations, and heterogeneity present notable diagnostic challenges. This article delves into the imaging modalities vital for their detection and characterization. Computed tomography is essential for initial assessment and staging. At the same time, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is particularly adept for liver, pancreatic, osseous, and rectal imaging, offering superior soft tissue contrast. The article also highlights the limitations of these imaging techniques, such as MRI's inability to effectively evaluate the cortical bone and the questioned cost-effectiveness of computed tomography and MRI for detecting specific gastric lesions. By emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of these imaging techniques, the review offers insights into optimizing their utilization for improved diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic management of neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Hesami
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Blake
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Anderson
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zahra Najmi
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter D Caravan
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ciprian Catana
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cynthia Czawlytko
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shadi Abdar Esfahani
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony Samir
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shaunagh McDermott
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ambrosini V, Fortunati E, Fanti S, Ursprung S, Asmundo L, O'Shea A, Kako B, Lee S, Furtado FS, Blake M, Goiffon RJ, Najmi Z, Hesami M, Murakami T, Domachevsky L, Catalano OA. State-of-the-Art Hybrid Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024:00004728-990000000-00299. [PMID: 38518197 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) may be challenging to diagnose due to their small size and diverse anatomical locations. Hybrid imaging techniques, specifically positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), represent the current state-of-the-art for evaluating NENs. The preferred radiopharmaceuticals for NEN PET imaging are gallium-68 (68Ga) DOTA-peptides, which target somatostatin receptors (SSTR) overexpressed on NEN cells. Clinical applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides PET/CT include diagnosis, staging, prognosis assessment, treatment selection, and response evaluation. Fluorodeoxyglucose-18 (18F-FDG) PET/CT aids in detecting low-SSTR-expressing lesions and helps in patient stratification and treatment planning, particularly in grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). New radiopharmaceuticals such as fluorine-labeled SSTR agonists and SSTR antagonists are emerging as alternatives to 68Ga-labeled peptides, offering improved detection rates and favorable biodistribution. The maturing of PET/MRI brings advantages to NEN imaging, including simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI images, superior soft tissue contrast resolution, and motion correction capabilities. The PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides has demonstrated higher lesion detection rates and more accurate lesion classification compared to PET/CT. Overall, hybrid imaging offers valuable insights in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning of NENs. Further research is needed to refine response assessment criteria and standardize reporting guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emilia Fortunati
- From the Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna
| | | | | | | | - Aileen O'Shea
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bashar Kako
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Susanna Lee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Felipe S Furtado
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Blake
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Reece J Goiffon
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zahra Najmi
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mina Hesami
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Takaaki Murakami
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Navin PJ, Ehman EC, Liu JB, Halfdanarson TR, Gupta A, Laghi A, Yoo DC, Carucci LR, Schima W, Sheedy SP. Imaging of Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:289-301. [PMID: 36752369 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the small bowel are typically slow-growing lesions that remain asymptomatic until reaching an advanced stage. Imaging modalities for lesion detection, staging, and follow-up in patients with known or suspected NEN include CT enterography, MR enterography, and PET/CT using a somatostatin receptor analog. FDG PET/CT may have a role in the evaluation of poorly differentiated NENs. Liver MRI, ideally with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent, should be used in the evaluation of hepatic metastases. Imaging informs decisions regarding both surgical approaches and systematic therapy (specifically, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the multimodality imaging features of small-bowel NENs; explores the optimal imaging modalities for their diagnosis, staging, and follow-up; and discusses how imaging may be used to guide therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Navin
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Eric C Ehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Jason B Liu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Akshya Gupta
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, AOU Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Don C Yoo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Wolfgang Schima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goettlicher Heiland Krankenhaus, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus and Sankt Josef Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shannon P Sheedy
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vogele D, Schmidt SA, Gnutzmann D, Thaiss WM, Ettrich TJ, Kornmann M, Beer M, Juchems MS. Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Current Status and Advances in Diagnostic Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2741. [PMID: 37685279 PMCID: PMC10486652 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEP-NEN) is a heterogeneous and complex group of tumors that are often difficult to classify due to their heterogeneity and varying locations. As standard radiological methods, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) are available for both localization and staging of NEN. Nuclear medical imaging methods with somatostatin analogs are of great importance since radioactively labeled receptor ligands make tumors visible with high sensitivity. CT and MRI have high detection rates for GEP-NEN and have been further improved by developments such as diffusion-weighted imaging. However, nuclear medical imaging methods are superior in detection, especially in gastrointestinal NEN. It is important for radiologists to be familiar with NEN, as it can occur ubiquitously in the abdomen and should be identified as such. Since GEP-NEN is predominantly hypervascularized, a biphasic examination technique is mandatory for contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. PET/CT with somatostatin analogs should be used as the subsequent method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Vogele
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (S.A.S.); (W.M.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Stefan A. Schmidt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (S.A.S.); (W.M.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Daniel Gnutzmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Konstanz Hospital, Mainaustraße 35, 78464 Konstanz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.S.J.)
| | - Wolfgang M. Thaiss
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (S.A.S.); (W.M.T.); (M.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Ettrich
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
- i2SouI—Innovative Imaging in Surgical Oncology Ulm, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Marko Kornmann
- i2SouI—Innovative Imaging in Surgical Oncology Ulm, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Meinrad Beer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (S.A.S.); (W.M.T.); (M.B.)
- i2SouI—Innovative Imaging in Surgical Oncology Ulm, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Markus S. Juchems
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Konstanz Hospital, Mainaustraße 35, 78464 Konstanz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.S.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ingenerf M, Rübenthaler J, Wenter V, Zacherl M, Völter F, Winkelmann M, Karim H, Schinner R, Ricke J, Berger F, Schmid-Tannwald C. Evaluation of MRI in the diagnostic accuracy of extrahepatic metastases in neuroendocrine tumors in comparison with the reference standard somatostatin-receptor-PET/CT. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1194152. [PMID: 37655102 PMCID: PMC10465364 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1194152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of different sets of MR sequences in detecting extrahepatic disease of NETs on routine liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Method One hundred twenty-seven patients with NETs with and without hepatic and extrahepatic metastases who underwent liver MRI and SSTR-PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated in consensus in four sessions: (1) non-contrast T1w+T2w (NC), (2) NC+DWI, (3) NC+ contrast-enhanced T1w (CE), and (4) NC+DWI+CE the presence and number of metastases (lymph nodes, bone, peritoneal surface, lung base, and abdominal organ). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value for detection of metastases were calculated for each session in a patient-based manner; detection and error rates were calculated for lesion-based analysis. Comparison between the MR-sessions and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed with the McNemar test. Results Regarding all 1,094 lesions detected in PET/CT, NC+DWI, and NC, CE+DWI identified most true-positive lesions 779 (71%) and 775 (71%), respectively. Patient-based analysis revealed significantly higher sensitivity by NC+DWI (85%) than NC and NC+CE (p = 0.011 and 0.004, respectively); the highest specificity was reached by NC+CE+DWI (100%). Site-based analysis revealed highest detection rates for lymph node metastases for NC+DWI and NC, CE+DWI (73 and 76%, respectively); error rates were lower for NC, CE+DWI with 5% compared with 17% (NC+DWI). Detection rates for bone metastases were similarly high in NC+DWI and NC, CE+DWI (75 and 74%, respectively), while CE showed no benefit. For peritoneal metastases highest sensitivity was reached by NC+DWI (67%). Conclusion The combination of NC+DWI showed better sensitivities than the combination of NC+CE. NC+DWI showed similar, sometimes even better sensitivities than NC+CE+DWI, but with lower specificities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Zacherl
- European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Völter
- European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Homeira Karim
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Berger
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maccioni F, Busato L, Valenti A, Cardaccio S, Longhi A, Catalano C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Role, Recent Advancements and Future Prospectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2410. [PMID: 37510154 PMCID: PMC10378103 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract (GI MRI), analyzing the major technical advances achieved in this field, such as diffusion-weighted imaging, molecular imaging, motility studies, and artificial intelligence. Today, MRI performed with the more advanced imaging techniques allows accurate assessment of many bowel diseases, particularly inflammatory bowel disease and rectal cancer; in most of these diseases, MRI is invaluable for diagnosis, staging, and disease monitoring under treatment. Several MRI parameters are currently considered activity biomarkers for inflammation and neoplastic disease. Furthermore, in younger patients with acute or chronic GI disease, MRI can be safely used for short-term follow-up studies in many critical clinical situations because it is radiation-free. MRI assessment of functional gastro-esophageal and small bowel disorders is still in its infancy but very promising, while it is well established and widely used for dynamic assessment of anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction; MRI motility biomarkers have also been described. There are still some limitations to GI MRI related to high cost and limited accessibility. However, technical advances are expected, such as faster sequences, more specific intestinal contrast agents, AI analysis of MRI data, and possibly increased accessibility to GI MRI studies. Clinical interest in the evaluation of bowel disease using MRI is already very high, but is expected to increase significantly in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Maccioni
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Busato
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Valenti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Cardaccio
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Longhi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Pathology and Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weber M, Telli T, Kersting D, Seifert R. Prognostic Implications of PET-Derived Tumor Volume and Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3581. [PMID: 37509242 PMCID: PMC10377105 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically, molecular imaging of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) was performed using SSTR scintigraphy (SRS). Sustained advances in medical imaging have led to its gradual replacement with SSTR positron-emission tomography (SSTR-PET). The higher sensitivity in comparison to SRS on the one hand and conventional cross-sectional imaging, on the other hand, enables more accurate staging and allows for image quantification. In addition, in recent years, a growing body of evidence has assessed the prognostic implications of SSTR-PET-derived prognostic biomarkers for NET patients, with the aim of risk stratification, outcome prognostication, and prediction of response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this narrative review, we give an overview of studies examining the prognostic value of advanced SSTR-PET-derived (semi-)quantitative metrics like tumor volume, uptake, and composite metrics. Complementing this analysis, a discussion of the current trends, clinical implications, and future directions is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Tugce Telli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boeckxstaens L, Pauwels E, Vandecaveye V, Deckers W, Cleeren F, Dekervel J, Vandamme T, Serdons K, Koole M, Bormans G, Laenen A, Clement PM, Geboes K, Van Cutsem E, Nackaerts K, Stroobants S, Verslype C, Van Laere K, Deroose CM. Prospective comparison of [ 18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:53. [PMID: 37261615 PMCID: PMC10235004 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluorine-18-labeled SSAs have the potential to become the next-generation tracer in SSTR-imaging in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients given their logistical advantages over the current gold standard gallium-68-labeled SSAs. In particular, [18F]AlF-OC has already shown excellent clinical performance. We demonstrated in our previous report from our prospective multicenter trial that [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT outperforms [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA, but histological confirmation was lacking due to ethical and practical reasons. In this second arm, we therefore aimed to provide evidence that the vast majority of [18F]AlF-OC PET lesions are in fact true NET lesions by analyzing their MR characteristics on simultaneously acquired MRI. We had a special interest in lesions solely detected by [18F]AlF-OC ("incremental lesions"). METHODS Ten patients with a histologically confirmed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and a standard-of-care [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, performed within 3 months, were prospectively included. Patients underwent a whole-body PET/MRI (TOF, 3 T, GE Signa), 2 hours after IV injection of 4 MBq/kg [18F]AlF-OC. Positive PET lesions were evaluated for a corresponding lesion on MRI. The diagnostic performance of both PET tracers was evaluated by determining the detection ratio (DR) for each scan and the differential detection ratio (DDR) per patient. RESULTS In total, 195 unique lesions were detected: 167 with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and 193 with [18F]AlF-OC. The DR for [18F]AlF-OC was 99.1% versus 91.4% for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, significant for non-inferiority testing (p = 0.0001). Out of these 193 [18F]AlF-OC lesions, 96.2% were confirmed by MRI to be NET lesions. Thirty-three incremental lesions were identified by [18F]AlF-OC, of which 91% were confirmed by MRI and considered true positives. CONCLUSION The DR of [18F]AlF-OC was numerically higher and non-inferior to the DR of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. [18F]AlF-OC lesions and especially incremental lesions were confirmed as true positives by MRI in more than 90% of lesions. Taken together, these data further validate [18F]AlF-OC as a new alternative for SSTR PET in clinical practice. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04552847. Registered 17 September 2020, https://beta. CLINICALTRIALS gov/study/NCT04552847.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennert Boeckxstaens
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elin Pauwels
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Radiology, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven and Division of Translational MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wies Deckers
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frederik Cleeren
- Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Dekervel
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Timon Vandamme
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Oncology, NETwerk Antwerpen-Waasland CoE, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kim Serdons
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul M Clement
- General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Geboes
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sigrid Stroobants
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital and Molecular Imaging and Radiology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium", Campus Gasthuisberg, Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suzuki K, Shiraishi T, Shioi I, Ozawa N, Okada T, Osone K, Sano T, Araki K, Ogawa H, Sano A, Sakai M, Sohda M, Shirabe K, Saeki H. Sigmoid colon schwannoma difficult to distinguish from peritoneal dissemination 13 years after pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor surgery. Surg Case Rep 2023; 9:76. [PMID: 37166522 PMCID: PMC10175520 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-023-01658-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schwannoma, which clinicians sometimes struggle to diagnose, is a tumor arising from Schwann cells of peripheral nerves, often in the soft tissues and rarely in the gastrointestinal tract. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) is rare among pancreatic tumors, and recurrence can occur long after resection. Here, we were presented with a case where a sigmoid colon schwannoma was difficult to distinguish from a postoperative recurrence of PNET and was diagnosed after laparoscopic resection. CASE PRESENTATION A 51-year-old man was diagnosed with PNET (NET G2) after a distal pancreatectomy (DP) 13 years ago. The patient underwent hepatectomy due to liver metastasis 12 years after initial radical surgery. The follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after hepatectomy showed pelvic nodules, and laparoscopic surgery was performed for both diagnosis and treatment because peritoneal dissemination of PNET could not be ruled out. Since the tumor was in the sigmoid colon, a partial colon resection was performed. The histopathological diagnosis was a schwannoma, and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS We experienced a case of sigmoid colon schwannoma that was difficult to differentiate from peritoneal dissemination of PNET and was later diagnosed after laparoscopic resection. In addition, this case involved a long-term postoperative recurrence of PNET that was amenable to radical resection, further establishing the importance of long-term imaging follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunobu Suzuki
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takuya Shiraishi
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
| | - Ikuma Shioi
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Naoya Ozawa
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takuhisa Okada
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Katsuya Osone
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takaaki Sano
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Araki
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hiroomi Ogawa
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Akihiko Sano
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Makoto Sakai
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Makoto Sohda
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Saeki
- Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parghane RV, Mahajan A, Chakrabarty N, Basu S. Imaging Recommendations for Theranostic PET-CT in Oncology. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractWe in this article have presented a review of the guideline recommendations on theranostic positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging which will be helpful to assist practitioners in providing appropriate patient care. Multiple guidelines by different societies and medical associations provide standards for diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of cancer patients. They have generated a number of recommendations related to 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, which are the classical examples of theranostic PET-CT imaging in current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul V. Parghane
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sandip Basu
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Diagnostic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Technique Optimization and Tips and Tricks for Radiologists. Tomography 2023; 9:217-246. [PMID: 36828370 PMCID: PMC9958666 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which derive from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system that specializes in producing hormones and neuropeptides and arise in most cases sporadically and, to a lesser extent, in the context of complex genetic syndromes. Furthermore, they are primarily nonfunctioning, while, in the case of insulinomas, gastrinomas, glucagonomas, vipomas, and somatostatinomas, they produce hormones responsible for clinical syndromes. The GEP-NEN tumor grade and cell differentiation may result in different clinical behaviors and prognoses, with grade one (G1) and grade two (G2) neuroendocrine tumors showing a more favorable outcome than grade three (G3) NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Two critical issues should be considered in the NEN diagnostic workup: first, the need to identify the presence of the tumor, and, second, to define the primary site and evaluate regional and distant metastases. Indeed, the primary site, stage, grade, and function are prognostic factors that the radiologist should evaluate to guide prognosis and management. The correct diagnostic management of the patient includes a combination of morphological and functional evaluations. Concerning morphological evaluations, according to the consensus guidelines of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), computed tomography (CT) with a contrast medium is recommended. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is usually indicated for use to evaluate the liver, pancreas, brain, and bones. Ultrasonography (US) is often helpful in the initial diagnosis of liver metastases, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can solve problems in characterizing the liver, as this tool can guide the biopsy of liver lesions. In addition, intraoperative ultrasound is an effective tool during surgical procedures. Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) with FDG for nonfunctioning lesions and somatostatin analogs for functional lesions are very useful for identifying and evaluating metabolic receptors. The detection of heterogeneity in somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is also crucial for treatment decision making. In this narrative review, we have described the role of morphological and functional imaging tools in the assessment of GEP-NENs according to current major guidelines.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lou X, Qin Y, Xu X, Yu X, Ji S. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and clinical challenge of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877:188782. [PMID: 36028148 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
During the course of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), they generally become more heterogeneous with individual cells exhibiting distinct molecular fingerprints. This heterogeneity manifests itself through an unequal distribution of genetically-variant, tumor cell subpopulations within disease locations (i.e., spatial heterogeneity) or changes in the genomic landscape over time (i.e., temporal heterogeneity); these characteristics complicate clinical diagnosis and treatment. Effective, feasible tumor heterogeneity detection and eradication methods are essential to overcome the clinical challenges of pancreatic NETs. This review explores the molecular fingerprints of pancreatic NETs and the spectrum of tumoral heterogeneity. We then describe the challenges of assessing heterogeneity by liquid biopsies and imaging modalities and the therapeutic challenges for pancreatic NETs. In general, navigating these challenges, refining approaches for translational research, and ultimately improving patient care are available once we have a better understanding of intratumoral spatiotemporal heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Lou
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yi Qin
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaowu Xu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Shunrong Ji
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaewput C, Vinjamuri S. Role of Combined 68Ga DOTA-Peptides and 18F FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020280. [PMID: 35204371 PMCID: PMC8871217 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This review article summarizes the role of combined 68Ga DOTA-peptides and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the evaluation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Patients with GEP-NENs can initially present themselves to a gastroenterologist or endocrinologist rather than cancer specialist; hence, it is vital for a wider group of clinicians to be familiar with the range of tests available for the evaluation of these patients. The role of PET scanning by using 68Ga DOTA-peptides has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of GEP-NENs and to guide patient selection for treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSA) and/or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The loss of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression was found to be associated with an increased glucose metabolism in cells. However, the routine use of SSTR targeted radiotracers in combination with 18F-FDG to evaluate glucose utilization in GEP-NENs is still debatable. In our opinion, in patients with NENs, 18F-FDG PET should be performed in the case of a negative or slightly positive 68Ga DOTA-peptides PET scan for assessing the dedifferentiation status, to guide correct therapeutic strategy and to evaluate the prognosis. The approach of combined receptor and metabolic imaging can improve diagnostic accuracy, especially considering the heterogeneity of these lesions. Therefore, 68Ga DOTA-peptides and 18F-FDG PET should be considered complementary in patients with GEP-NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chalermrat Kaewput
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +66-2419-6220
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hernando D, Zhang Y, Pirasteh A. Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Med Phys 2021; 49:2774-2793. [PMID: 34554579 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion MRI has enormous potential and utility in the evaluation of various abdominal and pelvic disease processes including cancer and noncancer imaging of the liver, prostate, and other organs. Quantitative diffusion MRI is based on acquisitions with multiple diffusion encodings followed by quantitative mapping of diffusion parameters that are sensitive to tissue microstructure. Compared to qualitative diffusion-weighted MRI, quantitative diffusion MRI can improve standardization of tissue characterization as needed for disease detection, staging, and treatment monitoring. However, similar to many other quantitative MRI methods, diffusion MRI faces multiple challenges including acquisition artifacts, signal modeling limitations, and biological variability. In abdominal and pelvic diffusion MRI, technical acquisition challenges include physiologic motion (respiratory, peristaltic, and pulsatile), image distortions, and low signal-to-noise ratio. If unaddressed, these challenges lead to poor technical performance (bias and precision) and clinical outcomes of quantitative diffusion MRI. Emerging and novel technical developments seek to address these challenges and may enable reliable quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Through systematic validation in phantoms, volunteers, and patients, including multicenter studies to assess reproducibility, these emerging techniques may finally demonstrate the potential of quantitative diffusion MRI for abdominal and pelvic imaging applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Hernando
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ali Pirasteh
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pirasteh A, Lovrec P, Bodei L. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: A pictorial review of the clinical value of different imaging modalities. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2021; 22:539-552. [PMID: 33783695 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-021-09631-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are multifaceted tumors occurring in a variety of organs and often present as metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Accurate staging is the most significant factor in therapy planning, but it remains a challenge. Imaging is established as the cornerstone for disease detection/diagnosis, staging, and follow up. To accurately assess and monitor tumor burden in patients with NETs, various imaging techniques have been developed and optimized. Current recommendations for the imaging of patients with NETs include a combination of both morphologic (or anatomic) and molecular imaging, but a final choice can be puzzling for clinicians. Recognizing that there is no uniform sequence consensus on the "best" imaging test, and the heterogeneity of technologic availability at different centers, we hope to provide a pictorial review of the different imaging techniques and their role and utility in management of patients with NETs, aimed to provide a practical guide for all clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Pirasteh
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
| | - Petra Lovrec
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Apitzsch J, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, Heinzel A. Use of full-dose contrast-enhanced CT for extrahepatic staging using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 27:573-579. [PMID: 34313245 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2021.19424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies have demonstrated that positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with Gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled somatostatin analogues are effective at detecting metastatic disease in neuroendocrine tumors (NET), especially extrahepatic metastases. However, PET in combination with full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) exposes patients to higher radiation (~25 mSv). The use of non-contrast-enhanced low-dose CT (ldCT) can reduce radiation to about 10 mSv and may avoid contrast-induced side effects. This study seeks to determine whether ceCT could be omitted from NET assessments. METHODS We retrospectively compared the performance of PET/ldCT versus PET/ceCT in 54 patients (26 male, 28 female) who had undergone a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The selection criteria were as follows: available ldCT and ceCT, histologically confirmed NET, and follow-up of at least 6 months (median, 12.6 months; range, 6.1-23.2 months). The PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT images were analyzed separately. We reviewed metastases in the lungs, bones, and lymph nodes. The results were compared with the reference standard (clinical follow-up data). RESULTS The PET/ceCT scans detected 139 true-positive bone lesions compared with 140 lesions detected by the PET/ldCT scans, 106 true-positive lymph node metastases (PET/ceCT) compared with 90 metastases detected by the PET/ldCT scans, and 26 true-positive lung lesions (PET/ceCT) compared with 6 lesions detected by the PET/ldCT scans. The overall lesion-based sensitivity for full-dose PET/ceCT was 97%, specificity 86%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 93%. The overall lesion-based sensitivity for PET/ldCT was 85%, specificity 73%, NPV 72%, and PPV 85%. CONCLUSION This study presents the first evidence that ceCT should not be omitted from extrahepatic staging using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with NET. ceCT alone can be used as a follow-up to reduce radiation exposure when the patient has already undergone PET/ceCT and suffers from non-DOTATATE-avid NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Apitzsch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Helios Hospital Pforzheim, Pforzheim, Germany
| | | | - Felix Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pirasteh A, Lovrec P, Pedrosa I. Imaging and its Impact on Defining the Oligometastatic State. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:186-199. [PMID: 34090645 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Successful treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is facilitated through timely detection and localization of disease, both at the time of initial diagnosis (synchronous OMD) and following the initial therapy (metachronous OMD). Hence, imaging plays an indispensable role in management of patients with OMD. However, the challenges and complexities of OMD management are also reflected in the imaging of this entity. While innovations and advances in imaging technology have made a tremendous impact in disease detection and management, there remain substantial and unaddressed challenges for earlier and more accurate establishment of OMD state. This review will provide an overview of the available imaging modalities and their inherent strengths and weaknesses, with a focus on their role and potential in detection and evaluation of OMD in different organ systems. Furthermore, we will review the role of imaging in evaluation of OMD for malignancies of various primary organs, such as the lung, prostate, colon/rectum, breast, kidney, as well as neuroendocrine tumors and gynecologic malignancies. We aim to provide a practical overview about the utilization of imaging for clinicians who play a role in the care of those with, or at risk for OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Pirasteh
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Petra Lovrec
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Departments of Radiology, Urology, and Advanced Imaging Research Center. University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Molecular Genomic Assessment Using a Blood-based mRNA Signature (NETest) is Cost-effective and Predicts Neuroendocrine Tumor Recurrence With 94% Accuracy. Ann Surg 2021; 274:481-490. [PMID: 34183517 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identification of residual disease after neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resection is critical for management. Post-surgery imaging is insensitive, expensive, and current biomarkers ineffective. We evaluated whether the NETest, a multigene liquid biopsy blood biomarker, correlated with surgical resection and could predict recurrence. METHODS Multicenter evaluation of NET resections over 24 months (n = 103): 47 pancreas, 26 small bowel, 26 lung, 2 appendix, 1 duodenum, 1 stomach. Surgery: R0 (83), R1/R2 (20). One millilitre of blood was collected at D0 and posroperative day (POD) 30. Transcript quantification by polymerase chain reaction (normal: ≤20), CgA by NEOLISA (normal ≤108 ng/mL). Standard-of-care (SoC) follow-up costs were calculated and compared to POD30 NETest-stratification approach. Analyses: Wilcoxon-paired test, Chi-square test. RESULTS D BIOMARKERS NETest: 103 of 103 (100%)-positive, whereas 23 of 103 (22%) were CgA-positive (Chi-square = 78, P < 0.0001).In the R0 group, the NETest decreased 59 ± 28 to 26 ± 23 (P < 0.0001); 36% (30/83) remained elevated. No significant decrease was evident for CgA. In the R1/R2 group the NETest decreased but 100% remained elevated. CgA levels did not decrease.An elevated POD30 NETest was present in R0 and 25 (83%) developed radiological recurrences. Normal score R0 s (n = 53) did not develop recurrence (Chi-square = 56, P < 0.0001). Recurrence prediction was 94% accurate with the NETest. COST EVALUATION Using the NETest to stratify postoperative imaging resulted in a cost-savings of 42%. CONCLUSION NETest diagnosis is more accurate than CgA (100% vs 22%). Surgery significantly decreased NETest. An elevated POD30 NETest predicted recurrence with 94% accuracy and post-surgical POD30 NETest follow-up stratification decreased costs by 42%. CgA had no surgical utility. Further studies would define the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the NETest in the detection of postoperative recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
22
|
Jawlakh H, Velikyan I, Welin S, Sundin A. 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI are superior to 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT for neuroendocrine tumour imaging. J Neuroendocrinol 2021; 33:e12981. [PMID: 34046974 DOI: 10.1111/jne.12981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess gadoxetate disodium contrast-enhanced (CE) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 68 Ga-DOTATOC and 11 C-5-Hydroxy-tryptophan (11 C-5-HTP) in comparison with iodine CE 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/computed tomography (CT) for neuroendocrine tumour imaging. Detection rate and reader's confidence were evaluated for each separate image volume: CE-CT, CE-MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging, 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/CT, 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET, and for the three combined hybrid examinations 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI, 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI and 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT. In 11 patients, 255 lesions were depicted. 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/MRI depicted 72.5%, 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/CT depicted 62.7%, 11 C-5-HTP-PET depicted 68.2% and CE-CT depicted 53% of lesions. 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/MRI (P < 0.001) and PET/CT (P = 0.02), 11 C-5-HTP-PET (P < 0.001) and MRI (P < 0.001) were superior to CT. 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI detected 92.5% and 92% of lesions, respectively, and both outperformed 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT (65%) (P < 0.001). For liver metastasis imaging, MRI alone was unsurpassed (P < 0.01) and 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI outperformed 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT (P < 0.001). For lymph node metastasis diagnosis, 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/MRI and PET/CT and 11 C-5-HTP-PET detected 94%, 94% and 94% of lesions, respectively, and outperformed MRI and CE-CT alone (P < 0.001). For bone metastasis imaging, 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET performed at PET/MRI and PET/CT and 11 C-5-HTP-PET performed equally well (P = 0.05) and better than MRI. Reader's confidence was better for 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI than for 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT. The tumour maximum standardised uptake value and tumour-to-liver ratio were both approximately twice as high as for 68 Ga-DOTATOC than for 11 C-5-HTP. 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI and 11 C-5-HTP-PET/MRI provided the highest detection rates and reader's confidence and were both superior to 68 Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT, mainly because of the MRI component. The imaging contrast with 68 Ga-DOTATOC was superior to that of 11 C-5-HTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Jawlakh
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Irina Velikyan
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Staffan Welin
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Sundin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Textural analysis of hybrid DOTATOC-PET/MRI and its association with histological grading in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 41:363-369. [PMID: 31977752 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are known to overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR), which can be visualized by DOTATOC-PET. Reduced SSTR expression on the other hand may indicate dedifferentiation. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess, if conventional PET parameters and textural features (TF) derived from simultaneous PET and MRI including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are associated with the proliferative activity of NETs, potentially allowing non-invasive tumor grading. METHODS Our institutional database was screened for patients with NET and liver metastases >1 cm. We assessed conventional PET parameters, such as maximum and mean standardized uptake value and more elaborate TF parameters from PET and ADC-MRI (including entropy and homogeneity) from up to the five largest liver lesions per patient. The association of proliferative activity as measured by Ki67-/MIB1-index with the aforementioned parameters was analyzed. RESULTS One hundred patients with NET/NECs were eligible with a Ki67-index ranging from <1% to 30%. Overall, 304 liver lesions were analyzed. Conventional PET parameters, entropy, homogeneity of PET and ADC maps differed significantly between G1 and G2 NETs. However, Spearman's test showed a weak association (r = -0.23 to 0.31). DISCUSSION In our study cohort, conventional PET parameters and TF of PET and ADC-MRI showed only a weak correlation with Ki67. This indicates that in patients with a Ki67-index of up to 30% TF analysis of combined PET/MRI may not be reliably used for accurate non-invasive tumor grading. On the other hand, DOTATOC-PET might be a suitable staging tool in some higher grade NET/NECs.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hu Y, Ye Z, Wang F, Qin Y, Xu X, Yu X, Ji S. Role of Somatostatin Receptor in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Development, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:679000. [PMID: 34093445 PMCID: PMC8170475 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.679000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare and part of the diverse family of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which are widely expressed in NENs, are G-protein coupled receptors that can be activated by somatostatins or its synthetic analogs. Therefore, SSTRs have been widely researched as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in pNETs. A large number of studies have demonstrated the clinical significance of SSTRs in pNETs. In this review, relevant literature has been appraised to summarize the most recent empirical evidence addressing the clinical significance of SSTRs in pNETs. Overall, these studies have shown that SSTRs have great value in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic prediction of pNETs; however, further research is still necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuheng Hu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeng Ye
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Qin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaowu Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xianjun Yu, ; Shunrong Ji,
| | - Shunrong Ji
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xianjun Yu, ; Shunrong Ji,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Isaac A, Lecouvet F, Dalili D, Fayad L, Pasoglou V, Papakonstantinou O, Ahlawat S, Messiou C, Weber MA, Padhani AR. Detection and Characterization of Musculoskeletal Cancer Using Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24:726-750. [PMID: 33307587 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is gradually being integrated into clinical pathways for the detection, characterization, and staging of malignant tumors including those arising in the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. Although further developments and research are needed, it is now recognized that WB-MRI enables reliable, sensitive, and specific detection and quantification of disease burden, with clinical applications for a variety of disease types and a particular application for skeletal involvement. Advances in imaging techniques now allow the reliable incorporation of WB-MRI into clinical pathways, and guidelines recommending its use are emerging. This review assesses the benefits, clinical applications, limitations, and future capabilities of WB-MRI in the context of other next-generation imaging modalities, as a qualitative and quantitative tool for the detection and characterization of skeletal and soft tissue MSK malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, United Kingdom.,Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Danoob Dalili
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, United Kingdom.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, John's Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Vasiliki Pasoglou
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olympia Papakonstantinou
- 2nd Department of Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, John's Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christina Messiou
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc-André Weber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Mestier L, Lepage C, Baudin E, Coriat R, Courbon F, Couvelard A, Do Cao C, Frampas E, Gaujoux S, Gincul R, Goudet P, Lombard-Bohas C, Poncet G, Smith D, Ruszniewski P, Lecomte T, Bouché O, Walter T, Cadiot G. Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:473-492. [PMID: 32234416 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) published in February 2020 (www.tncd.org). METHODS All French medical societies involved in the management of NEN took part in this work. Recommendations were graded into four categories (A, B, C or D), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until May 2019. RESULTS The management of NEN is challenging because of their heterogeneity and the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pathological analysis is required for their diagnostic and prognostic characterization, which mainly relies on differentiation, grade and stage. The two main emergency situations are functioning syndromes and poorly-differentiated carcinoma. Chromogranin A is the main biochemical marker of NET, although of limited clinical interest. Initial characterization relies on morphological and isotopic imaging. The treatment of localized NET relies on watchful follow-up and local or surgical resection depending on its supposed aggressiveness. Treatment options for metastatic disease include surgery, somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, organ-driven locoregional therapies and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. As specific predictive factors of treatment efficacy are yet to be identified and head-to-head comparisons have not or only rarely been performed, the therapeutic strategy currently depends on prognostic factors. Cumulative toxicity and the impact of treatment on quality of life must be considered since survival is relatively long in most patients with NET. CONCLUSION These guidelines are proposed to achieve the most beneficial therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as the therapeutic landscape of NEN is becoming ever more complex. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis de Mestier
- Department of Gastroenterology-Pancreatology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP) and Université de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Come Lepage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Dijon University Hospital, EPICAD INSERM LNC UMR 1231, University of Burgundy Dijon, France
| | - Eric Baudin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital (APHP) and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Courbon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Couvelard
- Department of Pathology of Bichat-Beaujon Hospitals (APHP), ENETS Centre of Excellence and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christine Do Cao
- Department of Endocrinology, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Eric Frampas
- Department of Radiology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Endocrine and Pancreatic Surgery, Cochin Hospital (APHP) and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Rodica Gincul
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Goudet
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Dijon University Hospital and University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Lombard-Bohas
- Department of Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France
| | - Gilles Poncet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Edouard Herriot Hospital and Lyon University, Lyon, France
| | - Denis Smith
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Haut-Lévèque Hospital and University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Philippe Ruszniewski
- Department of Gastroenterology-Pancreatology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP) and Université de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Cadiot
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Weber M, Kessler L, Schaarschmidt B, Fendler WP, Lahner H, Antoch G, Umutlu L, Herrmann K, Rischpler C. Treatment-related changes in neuroendocrine tumors as assessed by textural features derived from 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI with simultaneous acquisition of apparent diffusion coefficient. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:326. [PMID: 32299391 PMCID: PMC7161278 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06836-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) frequently overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which is the molecular basis for 68Ga-DOTATOC positron-emission tomography (PET) and radiopeptide therapy (PRRT). However, SSTR expression fluctuates and can be subject to treatment-related changes. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess, which changes in PET and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) occur for different treatments and if pre-therapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI was able to predict treatment response to PRRT. Methods Patients with histopathologically confirmed NET, at least one liver metastasis > 1 cm and at least two 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI including ADC maps were eligible. 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI of up to 5 liver lesions per patients was subsequently analyzed. Extracted features comprise conventional PET parameters, such as maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean) and ADC values. Furthermore, textural features (TFs) from both modalities were extracted. In patients with multiple 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI a pair of 2 scans each was analyzed separately and the parameter changes between both scans calculated. The same image analysis was performed in patients with 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI before PRRT. Differences in PET and ADC maps parameters between PRRT-responders and non-responders were compared using Mann-Whitney test to test differences among groups for statistical significance. Results 29 pairs of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI scans of 18 patients were eligible for the assessment of treatment-related changes. In 12 cases patients were treated with somatostatin analogues between scans, in 9 cases with PRRT and in 2 cases each patients received local treatment, chemotherapy and sunitinib. Treatment responders showed a statistically significant decrease in lesion volume and a borderline significant decrease in entropy on ADC maps when compared to non-responders. Patients treated with standalone SSA showed a borderline significant decrease in mean and maximum ADC, compared to patients treated with PRRT. No parameters were able to predict treatment response to PRRT on pre-therapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI. Conclusions Patients responding to current treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in lesion volume on ADC maps and a borderline significant decrease in entropy. No statistically significant changes in PET parameters were observed. No PET or ADC maps parameters predicted treatment response to PRRT. However, the sample size of this preliminary study is small and further research needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lukas Kessler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaarschmidt
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Harald Lahner
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Division of Laboratory Research, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
(Radio)Theranostic Patient Management in Oncology Exemplified by Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer, and Breast Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:ph13030039. [PMID: 32151049 PMCID: PMC7151671 DOI: 10.3390/ph13030039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of nuclear medicine in the management of oncological patients has expanded during last two decades. The number of radiopharmaceuticals contributing to the realization of theranostics/radiotheranostics in the context of personalized medicine is increasing. This review is focused on the examples of targeted (radio)pharmaceuticals for the imaging and therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), prostate cancer, and breast cancer. These examples strongly demonstrate the tendency of nuclear medicine development towards personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
30
|
Minon M, Soriano C, Morland D, Walter T, Lepage C, Tabarin A, Deblock M, Rousset P, Barbe C, Hoeffel C, Cadiot G. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted and conventional imaging for the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine 2020; 67:243-251. [PMID: 31564038 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-019-02095-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM To determine whether whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is valuable in staging of neuroendocrine tumors by comparison with the conventional imaging defined by the combination of computed tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. METHODS This study concerned the patients included in the multicenter prospective study NCT02786303 with the following inclusion criteria: well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors or of unknown primary, and computed tomography, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy performed within 6 weeks. Results of the conventional imaging were compared with those of magnetic resonance imaging. Discrepancies between the conventional imaging and magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated by reviewing medical records. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (17 men and 14 women) were prospectively included. Complete concordance between the magnetic resonance imaging and the conventional imaging results was observed in 25 patients and discrepancies in 6. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging detected more liver lesions than the conventional imaging did but standard imaging set was more effective in the detection of bone and peritoneum lesions than magnetic resonance imaging. Detecting more lesions had no impact on therapeutic management. CONCLUSIONS Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion weighted may be a valuable alternative to computed tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Further studies should compare whole-body MRI to the 68Ga PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilien Minon
- Department of Radiology, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
| | - Clothilde Soriano
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - David Morland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jean-Godinot, Biophysics laboratory, UFR Medecine, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Reims, France
- CRESTIC, EA 3804, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Reims, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Gastroenterology & Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - Antoine Tabarin
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Mathilde Deblock
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lorraine Cancer Institute, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Radiology Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Coralie Barbe
- Clinical Research Coordination Unit, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
- CRESTIC, EA 3804, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Reims, France
| | - Guillaume Cadiot
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rozenblum L, Mokrane FZ, Yeh R, Sinigaglia M, Besson FL, Seban RD, Zadro C, Dierickx L, Chougnet CN, Partouche E, Revel-Mouroz P, Zhao B, Otal P, Schwartz LH, Dercle L. Imaging-guided precision medicine in non-resectable gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A step-by-step approach. Eur J Radiol 2020; 122:108743. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
32
|
Duan H, Baratto L, Iagaru A. The Role of PET/CT in the Imaging of Pancreatic Neoplasms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2019; 40:500-508. [PMID: 31806148 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas cancer is a complex disease and its prognosis is related to the origin of the tumor cell as well as the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas derive from the exocrine pancreas and are the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, while well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) derived from the endocrine part of the pancreas are rare and characterized by a slow growth and good life expectancy. Surgery is the only curative treatment approach, and an accurate assessment of resectability is of paramount importance in order to avoid futile procedures. The role of molecular imaging with positron emission tomography and computed tomography ranges from indispensable for pNETs to controversial for certain scenarios in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. This review article aims to overview molecular pancreatic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Lucia Baratto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the current literature on technical feasibility and diagnostic value of PET/MRI in management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database identified studies that evaluated the role of simultaneous PET/MRI for the evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors in human subjects. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking simultaneous PET/MRI, absence of other than attenuation-correction MRI pulse sequences, and case reports. No data-pooling or statistical analysis was performed due to the small number of articles and heterogeneity of the methodologies. Results From the 21 identified articles, five were included, which demonstrated successful technical feasibility of simultaneous PET/MRI through various imaging protocols in a total of 105 patients. All articles demonstrated equal or superior detection of liver lesions by PET/MRI over PET/CT. While one study reported superior detection of bone lesions by PET/MRI, two demonstrated favorable detection by PET/CT. Two studies demonstrated superiority of PET/CT in detection of nodal metastases; three studies reported the pitfall of PET/MRI in detection of lung lesion. Conclusion The current literature reports successful technical feasibility of PET/MRI for imaging of NETs. While whole-body PET/CT in conjunction with an abdominal MRI may serve as a comprehensive approach for baseline staging, follow up with PET/MRI may be preferred for those with liver-only disease. Another possible role for PET/MRI is to provide a multiparametric approach to follow up of response to treatment. With further advances in MRI imaging acquisitions and post-processing techniques, PET/MRI may become more applicable to a broader group of patients with NETs, and possibly the imaging modality of choice for this patient population.
Collapse
|
34
|
Komek H, Ansal Balci T, Can C. Efficacy of Galium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT in the Detection of Metastasis Rate of Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. ASIA OCEANIA JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2019; 7:141-148. [PMID: 31380453 PMCID: PMC6661313 DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2019.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective(s): The aim of this study was to determine metastasis rate in patients with well-differentiated grade1 (G1) and grade 2 (G2) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) using the gallium-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT). This study was also targeted toward investigating the relationship of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with mitotic count, histological grade, and Ki-67 index. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients (i.e., 17 males and 21 females) with G1 or G2 GEP NETs who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil training and research hospital between November 2014 and March 2018. The patients had at least one positive lesion that was approved by two nuclear medicine specialists with a minimum of 10 years of experience. Results: The median age of the patients was 50 years (age range: 27-80 years), and their mean age was 52±15 years. Out of 38 patients, 1 (2.6%), 2 (5.2%), 2 (5.2%), 3 (7.8%), 10 (28.5%), and 19 (50%) patients had primary hepatic, primary mesenteric, colon, duodenal, gastric, and pancreatic NETs, respectively. In addition, the liver metastasis, local lymph node invasions, distant lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, peritoneal involvement, and lung metastasis were observed in 42%, 21%, 15.7%, 13%, 7.8%, and 5% of the cases, respectively. The SUVmax median values of G1 and G2 tumors were 9.45 (range: 4.2-43.6) and 34.9 (range: 4.1-103), respectively (P=0.003). The Ki-67 index showed a negative correlation with the SUVmax value of the liver metastases and the highest SUVmax value (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). There was also a negative correlation between mitosis count and the highest SUVmax value (P=0.011). Conclusion: Based on the findings, although [68Ga]DOTATATE PET/CT is successfully used to diagnose primary GEP NETs and their metastases, the SUVmax value obtained from DOTATATE PET/CT showed a negative correlation with Ki-67 and mitotic count.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halil Komek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Tansel Ansal Balci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Canan Can
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rozenblum L, Mokrane FZ, Yeh R, Sinigaglia M, Besson F, Seban RD, Chougnet CN, Revel-Mouroz P, Zhao B, Otal P, Schwartz LH, Dercle L. The role of multimodal imaging in guiding resectability and cytoreduction in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: focus on PET and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2474-2493. [PMID: 30980115 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01994-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare neoplasms that secrete peptides and neuro-amines. pNETs can be sporadic or hereditary, syndromic or non-syndromic with different clinical presentations and prognoses. The role of medical imaging includes locating the tumor, assessing its extent, and evaluating the feasibility of curative surgery or cytoreduction. Pancreatic NETs have very distinctive phenotypes on CT, MRI, and PET. PET have been demonstrated to be very sensitive to detect either well-differentiated pNETs using 68Gallium somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiotracers, or more aggressive undifferentiated pNETS using 18F-FDG. A comprehensive interpretation of multimodal imaging guides resectability and cytoreduction in pNETs. The imaging phenotype provides information on the differentiation and proliferation of pNETs, as well as the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tumors with prognostic and therapeutic implications. This review provides a structured approach for standardized reading and reporting of medical imaging studies with a focus on PET and MR techniques. It explains which imaging approach should be used for different subtypes of pNET and what a radiologist should be looking for and reporting when interpreting these studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rozenblum
- Sorbonne Université, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Fatima-Zohra Mokrane
- Radiology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhes, 31059, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mathieu Sinigaglia
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florent Besson
- Paris Sud University, Kremlin Bicêtre Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie-René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Cecile N Chougnet
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Paul Revel-Mouroz
- Radiology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhes, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philippe Otal
- Radiology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 1 Avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhes, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- UMR 1015, Gustave Roussy Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Rimbaş M, Crino SF, Gasbarrini A, Costamagna G. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation as an alternative to surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Who should we treat? Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8:220-226. [PMID: 31249164 PMCID: PMC6714479 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_28_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are rare tumors, but their incidental diagnosis has significantly increased due to the widespread use of imaging studies. Therefore, most PanNENs are now diagnosed when completely asymptomatic and in early stages. PanNENs are classified according to their grade (Ki-67 index) and can be functional (F-) or nonfunctional (NF-) depending on the presence or absence of a clinical, hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. The mainstay treatment of PanNENs is a surgery that is mostly curative but also associated with significant short- and long-term adverse events. Therefore, less invasive alternative locoregional treatment modalities are warranted. Recently, few case reports and two case series have described EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for the treatment of patients with both F-PanNENs and NF-PanNENs. If for F-PanNENs EUS-RFA can very easily become the standard of care, for NF-PanNENEs it is still controversial how to select patients for EUS-RFA. A balance between overtreatment (i.e., RFA/surgery in patients who will not progress) and undertreatment (locoregional treatments in patients with undetected metastases) needs to be found based on solid data. The decision should also take into account patients’ comorbidity and risk of postoperative death, life expectancy, tumor location, risk of postoperative fistula and postoperative morbidity, and risk of long-term exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency. To answer the important question on which a patient should be treated with EUS-RFA, properly designed studies to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment in large cohorts of patients with NF-PanNENs and to establish prognostic factors associated with treatment response are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Foundation University Policlinico Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit; Division of Gastroenterology, Foundation University Policlinico Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbaş
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Foundation University Policlinico Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Department of Gastroenterology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefano Francesco Crino
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Foundation University Policlinico Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Foundation University Policlinico Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; IHU-USIAS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen RT. Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:837-860. [PMID: 29973077 PMCID: PMC6283410 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1496822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently, there have been a number of advances in imaging pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), as well as other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which have had a profound effect on the management and treatment of these patients, but in some cases are also associated with controversies. Areas covered: These advances are the result of numerous studies attempting to better define the roles of both cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, with or without fine-needle aspiration, and molecular imaging in both sporadic and inherited panNET syndromes; the increased attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with tumor classification or have prognostic value; the rapidly increasing use of molecular imaging in these tumors and the attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with treatment/outcome results. Each of these areas and the associated controversies are reviewed. Expert commentary: There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the imaging of panNETs, as well as other NETs, in the last few years. The advances are leading to expanded roles of imaging in the management of these patients and the results being seen in panNETs/GI-NETs with these newer techniques are already being used in more common tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- a Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science , Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University , Fukuoka , Japan
- b Digestive Diseases Branch , NIDDK, NIH , Bethesda , MD , USA
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- c Neuroendocrine Tumor Centra, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital International University of Health and Welfare 3-6-45 Momochihama , Sawara-Ku, Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Robert T Jensen
- b Digestive Diseases Branch , NIDDK, NIH , Bethesda , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Whole-Body MR Imaging: The Novel, "Intrinsically Hybrid," Approach to Metastases, Myeloma, Lymphoma, in Bones and Beyond. PET Clin 2018; 13:505-522. [PMID: 30219185 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body MR imaging (WB-MR imaging) has become a modality of choice for detecting bone metastases in multiple cancers, and bone marrow involvement by multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Combination of anatomic and functional sequences imparts an inherently hybrid dimension to this nonirradiating tool and extends the screening of malignancies outside the skeleton. WB-MR imaging outperforms bone scintigraphy and CT and offers an alternative to PET in many tumors by time of lesion detection and assessment of treatment response. Much work has been done to standardize procedures, optimize sequences, validate indications, confirm preliminary research into new applications, rendering clinical application more user-friendly.
Collapse
|
40
|
Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Oncology Setting: An Overview and Update on Recent Advances. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018; 43:66-75. [PMID: 30015799 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is becoming an important tool in oncology as a nonirradiating imaging technique since recent technological advances allowed the incorporation of high-quality imaging in an adequate time. Moreover, the noninjection of radioisotope/intravenous contrast, low cost compared with traditional nuclear medicine techniques, and fast acquisition times are another distinct feature. Thus, the purpose of this article is to review the whole-body magnetic resonance imaging protocol and its main applications in the oncology setting.
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the use of 68Ga tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid-DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) PET/CT, a functional imaging modality for assessment of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It has become the preferred imaging modality for initial diagnosis, selection of patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and localization of unknown primary tumors. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline has added 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as an appropriate test in the management of NETs. CONCLUSION In combination with FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can noninvasively assess tumor heterogeneity, especially in G2 and G3 NETs, for personalized management of patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
Fast non-enhanced abdominal examination protocols in PET/MRI for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET): comparison to multiphase contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Radiol Med 2018; 123:860-870. [PMID: 29961229 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0917-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate fast non-enhanced protocols for abdominal PET/MRI in comparison to contrast-enhanced PET/CT with somatostatin receptor (SSR)-specific radiotracers regarding effectiveness of lesion detection in NET patients. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 29 patients (12 male, 57 ± 13 years) who underwent PET/CT and subsequently PET/MRI at the same day. Two readers evaluated independently four PET/MRI setups: (I) PET + T2 Half Fourier Acquisition Single Shot Turbo Spin Echo (T2 HASTE), (II) PET + T2 HASTE + T2-weighted spin-echo sequence (T2 TSE), III) PET + T2 HASTE + Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and (IV) PET + T2 HASTE + T2 TSE + DWI. A consensus reading of PET/MRI and PET/CT including follow-up examinations served as the reference standard for lesion-based analysis. Lesion sizes were assessed. RESULTS Setup IV provided comparable overall detection rates as PET/CT in both readers: PET/MRI 91.5%/92.9% versus 89.7% in PET/CT. In liver and bone lesions (mean diameter: 1.9 and 1.5 cm), PET/MRI was equal or superior to PET/CT: 98%/98% versus 85% in PET/CT; 100%/95% versus 100% in PET/CT, but inferior in pancreatic lesions, small bowel lesions and lymph node metastases (mean diameter: 1.3, 0.5 and 1.8 cm). CONCLUSION A non-enhanced MR protocol comprising T2 HASTE, T2 TSE and DWI for SSR-PET/MRI seems to provide comparable effectiveness in lesions detection as multiphase contrast-enhanced PET/CT. It might, therefore, serve as valid alternative, e.g., for follow-up examinations in patients with unresectable NET and kidney failure.
Collapse
|
43
|
Merino-Casabiel X, Aller J, Arbizu J, García-Figueiras R, González C, Grande E, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Sevilla MI, Capdevila J. Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1522-1528. [PMID: 29766455 PMCID: PMC6223716 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors. METHODS To answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting. RESULTS Expert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Merino-Casabiel
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Aller
- Endocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Arbizu
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - R García-Figueiras
- Radiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - C González
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Grande
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Jiménez-Fonseca
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - M I Sevilla
- Medical Oncology Department, Investigación Clínica y Traslacional en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - J Capdevila
- Medical Oncology Department and Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Pg Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Werner RA, Solnes LB, Javadi MS, Weich A, Gorin MA, Pienta KJ, Higuchi T, Buck AK, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Lapa C. SSTR-RADS Version 1.0 as a Reporting System for SSTR PET Imaging and Selection of Potential PRRT Candidates: A Proposed Standardization Framework. J Nucl Med 2018; 59:1085-1091. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.206631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
45
|
Tirosh A, Kebebew E. The utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis, management, follow-up and prognosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Future Oncol 2018; 14:111-122. [PMID: 29072093 PMCID: PMC5967363 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that emerge mainly from the GI tract, pancreas and respiratory tract. The incidence of NETs has increased more than sixfold in the last decades. NETs typically express somatostatin receptors on their cell surface, which can be targeted by 'cold' somatostatin analogs for therapy or by 'hot' radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for tumor localization and treatment. 68-Gallium-DOTA peptides (DOTATATE, DOTATOC, DOTANOC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a highly accurate imaging modality for NETs that has been found to be more sensitive for NET detection than other imaging modalities. In the current review, we will discuss the clinical utility of 68-Gallium-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the diagnosis and management of patients with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Tirosh
- Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Electron Kebebew
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Department of Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Marini F, Giusti F, Tonelli F, Brandi ML. Management impact: effects on quality of life and prognosis in MEN1. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24:T227-T242. [PMID: 28733468 DOI: 10.1530/erc-17-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant endocrine tumor syndrome, caused by inactivating mutations of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene at 11q13 locus, which predisposes to develop tumors in target neuroendocrine tissues. As the positional cloning and identification of the causative gene in 1997, genetic diagnosis, by the sequencing-based research of gene mutations, has become an important tool in the early and differential diagnosis of the disease. Application of the genetic test, in MEN1 index cases and in first-degree relatives of mutated patients, has been constantly increasing during the last two decades, also thanks to the establishment of multidisciplinary referral centers and specific genetic counseling, and thanks to the wide availability of high throughput instruments for gene sequencing and gene mutation identification. The MEN1 genetic test helps the specific diagnosis of probands, and allows the early identification of asymptomatic carriers, strongly contributing, together with progressions in tumor diagnostic techniques and in pharmacological and surgical therapeutic approaches, to the reduction of morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. International clinical guidelines for MEN1 have been drafted by panels of specialists in the field, with the main goal to improve the management of the disease and grant patients a better quality of life. Here, we review main recommendations and suggestions derived by the last published general guidelines in 2012, and by most recent published studies about MEN1 syndrome diagnosis, clinical management, therapeutic approaches and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Marini
- Department of Surgery and Translational MedicineUniversity of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Giusti
- Department of Surgery and Translational MedicineUniversity of Florence, Largo Palagi 1, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Tonelli
- Department of Surgery and Translational MedicineUniversity of Florence, Largo Palagi 1, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Department of Surgery and Translational MedicineUniversity of Florence, Largo Palagi 1, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Graham MM, Gu X, Ginader T, Breheny P, Sunderland JJ. 68Ga-DOTATOC Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1452-1458. [PMID: 28280220 PMCID: PMC6944175 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
68Ga-DOTATOC, a somatostatin receptor-targeted ligand, has been used clinically in Europe over the past decade for imaging neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It appears to be quite sensitive and effective for clinical management decision making. This metaanalysis summarizes the efficacy of 68Ga-DOTATOC for several distinct indications and is intended to support approval of this agent by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Methods: The major electronic medical databases were searched for relevant papers over the period from January 2001 to November 2015. Papers were selected for review in 3 categories: clinical trials that reported sensitivity and specificity, comparison studies with 111In-octreotide, and change of management studies. All the eligible papers underwent Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) assessment, which was useful in the final selection of papers for review. Results: The initial search yielded 468 papers. After detailed evaluation, 17 papers were finally selected. Five types of studies emerged: workup of patients with symptoms and biomarker findings suggestive of NET, but with negative conventional imaging (3 papers, yield was only 13%); sensitivity (12 papers; sensitivity, 92%) and specificity (7 papers; specificity, 82%); identification of site of unknown primary in patients with metastatic NET (4 papers, yield was 44%); impact on subsequent NET patient management (4 papers, change in management in 51%); and comparison with 111In-octreotide (2 papers, sensitivity of DOTATOC on a per-lesion basis was 100%, for 111In-octreotide it was 78.2%; specificity was not available). Safety was not explicitly addressed in any study, but there were no reports of adverse events. Conclusion:68Ga-DOTATOC is useful for evaluating the presence and extent in disease for staging and restaging and for assisting in treatment decision making for patients with NET. It is also effective in locating the site of an unknown primary in NET patients who present with metastatic NET, but no known primary tumor. It also appears to be more accurate than 111In-octreotide. Although 68Ga-DOTATOC would seem to be useful in evaluating patients with suggestive symptoms and biomarker findings, it does not perform well in this setting and has low yield. Overall, it appears to be an excellent imaging agent to assess patients with known NET and frequently leads to a change in management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Graham
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Xiaomei Gu
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; and
| | - Timothy Ginader
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Patrick Breheny
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - John J Sunderland
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Imaging approaches to assess the therapeutic response of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): current perspectives and future trends of an exciting field in development. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016; 34:823-42. [PMID: 26433592 PMCID: PMC4661203 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-015-9598-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a family of neoplasms with a complex spectrum of clinical behavior. Although generally more indolent than carcinomas, once they progress beyond surgical resectability, they are essentially incurable. Systemic treatment options have substantially expanded in recent years for the management of advanced disease. Imaging plays a major role in new drug development, as it is the main tool used to objectively evaluate response to novel agents. However, current standard response criteria have proven suboptimal for the assessment of the antiproliferative effect of many targeted agents, particularly in the context of slow-growing tumors such as well-differentiated NETs. The aims of this article are to discuss the advantages and limitations of conventional radiological techniques and standard response assessment criteria and to review novel imaging modalities in development as well as alternative cancer- and therapy-specific criteria to assess drug efficacy in the field of GEP-NETs.
Collapse
|
49
|
Panagiotidis E, Alshammari A, Michopoulou S, Skoura E, Naik K, Maragkoudakis E, Mohmaduvesh M, Al-Harbi M, Belda M, Caplin ME, Toumpanakis C, Bomanji J. Comparison of the Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on Clinical Management in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2016; 58:91-96. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
50
|
Taelman VF, Radojewski P, Marincek N, Ben-Shlomo A, Grotzky A, Olariu CI, Perren A, Stettler C, Krause T, Meier LP, Cescato R, Walter MA. Upregulation of Key Molecules for Targeted Imaging and Therapy. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1805-1810. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
|