A bidomain model for ring stimulation of a cardiac strand

On the mechanism of ventricular defibrillation

The mechanism of ventricular defibrillation can be considered at many different levels. The highest level is considered at strength of the shock given through the defibrillation electrodes. At the next level, the mechanism of defibrillation can be examined in terms of the electrical field that the shock produces throughout the ventricles. Other levels include the effects this electric field has on the activation sequences and on the cellular action potentials that either initiate or inhibit the early sites of activation following the shock. Yet another level considers the mechanism by which the shock field initiates new action potentials or prolongs the action potential by changing the transmembrane potential during the shock. Finally, the subcellular level is considered, which involves the response of the individual ion channels to the shock. This review gives a brief overview of some salient features of defibrillation at each of these mechanistic levels.

Virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue: a common mechanism for anodal and cathodal stimulation

Traditional cable analyses cannot explain complex patterns of excitation in cardiac tissue with unipolar, extracellular anodal, or cathodal stimuli. Epifluorescence imaging of the transmembrane potential during and after stimulation of both refractory and excitable tissue shows distinctive regions of simultaneous depolarization and hyperpolarization during stimulation that act as virtual cathodes and anodes. The results confirm bidomain model predictions that the onset (make) of a stimulus induces propagation from the virtual cathode, whereas stimulus termination (break) induces it from the virtual anode. In make stimulation, the virtual anode can delay activation of the underlying tissue, whereas in break stimulation this occurs under the virtual cathode. Thus make and break stimulations in cardiac tissue have a common mechanism that is the result of differences in the electrical anisotropy of the intracellular and extracellular spaces and provides clear proof of the validity of the bidomain model.