The effect of wheelchair handrim tube diameter on propulsion efficiency and force application (tube diameter and efficiency in wheelchairs)

Glenohumeral contact force, peak muscle forces, and thorax motion increase with fatiguing wheelchair propulsion in persons with a spinal cord injury

Shoulder problems are highly prevalent among manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury, affecting their functioning and quality of life. This study investigates the impact of fatigue on wheelchair propulsion technique and shoulder loading in manual wheelchair users (MWU) with SCI. Twelve MWU with a paraplegia performed a standardized fatiguing wheelchair propulsion protocol; a biomechanical assessment of treadmill propulsion was obtained before and after the fatiguing protocol. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), upper extremity kinematics, and wheelchair propulsion kinetics were assessed. Results showed increased RPE post-fatigue, with no significant changes in exerted forces but increased thorax forward lean and range of motion. Musculoskeletal modelling showed elevated glenohumeral joint contact force and muscle forces post-fatigue. These findings suggest a potential link between fatigue, altered propulsion technique, and increased shoulder loading, highlighting the risk of overuse injuries. Moreover, increased thorax motion during propulsion may indicate fatigue onset. Prospective cohort studies are warranted to validate the presented findings and explore the relationship between shoulder loading and injury risk. Understanding these dynamics can inform interventions to mitigate shoulder pain and enhance the well-being of MWU with SCI.

Mapping wheelchair functions and their associated functional elements for stair climbing accessibility: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Wheelchair (WC) design elements are subjected to the accessibility and assistive needs of a person with locomotor disability. In order to pursue a holistic design for a stairclimbing WC, there is a need for literature review on WC functions reported for both stair climbing and plane surface movement.

METHODS

A total of 112 Research articles are reviewed for the purpose of extracting the relationship between WC design elements and the functions associated with them. Stairclimbing technologies are reviewed for their technological assessment in terms of functional elements associated with stairclimbing. Cross-functional mapping between functional elements and their dominant function is performed. Heat map for primary user needs and associated design elements is generated from cross mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

A design gap for user's functional needs is indicated from the review of literature on prototypes and products of WC. The literature in stairclimbing technology is primarily focussed on stair climbing capability and not on the other functional needs, such as safety, ride comfort, seat comfort, manoeuvrability, etc.Implications for rehabilitationFor attaining the goal of an effective rehabilitation, it is important to design and develop an assistive technology that can provide maximum accessibility and functioning for a person with disability. In case of locomotor disability, wheelchair (WC) is the most empowering tool that can assist people in both accessibility and activities of daily living. This review of literature was conducted to draw out the functions fulfilled by a WC, such as safety, comfort, propulsion for its users and the associated WC elements like seat, wheels, backrest, etc., that are required to fulfil those functions.WC being the most important technological intervention in the life of a person who cannot walk should be designed with the highest level of empathy. Therefore, each and every aspect of the user's physical and emotional needs should be catered up to the limits of engineering design. The research on stair climbing technologies has also grown exponentially, fuelled by technological growth in engineering mechanisms, ambient awareness sensors, actuators, etc. The review attempts to envelop such technologies and consolidate them on the basis of their capabilities and efficacies.The virtue of stair climbing has been realized through some novel and innovative mechanisms reviewed in this article that can be integrated with the research in field of functional elements required to carry out primary functions of a disabled person, such as safety, comfort, intuitiveness, etc. This review can help in coupling both of them in a more rational way where a designer who is designing the technology is more empathetic towards the design for accessibility. It can also help user in becoming more confident towards adapting a new assistive technology.

A newly developed hand rim for wheelchair tennis improves propulsion technique and efficiency in able-bodied novices

A new wheelchair tennis hand rim was developed, having a larger contact area and higher friction. How does this new hand rim compare to a regular hand rim regarding submaximal propulsion with a tennis racket during practice in novices? Twenty-four able-bodied novices (12 Regular Rim, 12 New Rim) completed a one-day experiment: pre-test, three practice-sessions and a post-test of 3 × 4 min each on a wheelchair ergometer (1.11 m/s, 7W). The New Rim group compared to the Regular Rim group, had a lower negative work per cycle (-0.83J vs. -2.06J, p = 0.01) at the post-test. There was a significantly larger increase in mechanical efficiency between the pre- and post-test in the New Rim group (2.3-3.4% vs. 2.1-2.5%, p = 0.02) compared to the Regular Rim group. The new rim led to a more ergonomic propulsion technique, with a reduction in negative power and higher mechanical efficiency between the pre- and post-test at submaximal propulsion.

How Was Studied the Effect of Manual Wheelchair Configuration on Propulsion Biomechanics: A Systematic Review on Methodologies

Background

For both sports and everyday use, finding the optimal manual wheelchair (MWC) configuration can improve a user's propulsion biomechanics. Many studies have already investigated the effect of changes in MWC configuration but comparing their results is challenging due to the differences in experimental methodologies between articles.

Purpose

The present systematic review aims at offering an in-depth analysis of the methodologies used to study the impact of MWC configuration on propulsion biomechanics, and ultimately providing the community with recommendations for future research.

Methods

The reviewing process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart on two databases (Scopus and PubMed) in March 2022.

Results

Forty-five articles were included, and the results highlighted the multiplicity of methodologies regarding different experimental aspects, including propulsion environment, experimental task, or measurement systems, for example. More importantly, descriptions of MWC configurations and their modifications differed significantly between studies and led to a lack of critical information in many cases.

Discussion

Studying the effect of MWC configuration on propulsion requires recommendations that must be clarified: (1) the formalism chosen to describe MWC configuration (absolute or relative) should be consistent with the type of study conducted and should be documented enough to allow for switching to the other formalism; (2) the tested MWC characteristics and initial configuration, allowing the reproduction or comparison in future studies, should be properly reported; (3) the bias induced by the experimental situation on the measured data must be considered when drawing conclusions and therefore experimental conditions such as propulsion speed or the effect of the instrumentation should be reported.

Conclusion

Overall, future studies will need standardization to be able to follow the listed recommendations, both to describe MWC configuration and mechanical properties in a clear way and to choose the experimental conditions best suited to their objectives.

Scoping review of propelling aids for manual wheelchairs

Manual wheelchair (MWC) users face a variety of obstacles limiting their participation. Different MWC models and new add-on components intended to improve propulsion may impact users' function and participation, although there is a lack of research on this topic. The aims of this study were to: 1) identify MWC propelling aids (PA) that are reported in the literature; 2) classify the outcomes used to evaluate the influence of PA according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); and 3) summarize evidence for the influence of PA. A scoping review was conducted in 2017 using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Compendex, IEEE Xplore, RESNA and ISS proceedings, Google, and Google Scholar. The content of each manuscript was assessed by two independent reviewers. A total of 28 PA (19 human-powered; 9 power-assisted) were identified from 163 manuscripts. The three most cited ICF subdomains were "Activity & Participation" (n = 125), "Body Function" (n = 100), and "Personal Factors" (n = 55). The findings suggest an overall positive influence of PA on various ICF domains/subdomains, but initial findings should be interpreted with caution. Confirmation of the effect and safety of PA requires higher levels of evidence.

Evaluation of two wheelchair hand rim models: contact pressure distribution in straight line and curve trajectories

Manual wheelchairs are essential for people with disabilities or limited mobility. However, manual propulsion causes biomechanical loads, including contact pressures on the palms of the hands. The hand rim design has received little attention over time, remaining almost unchanged since its creation. This study investigated how two different designs of such devices - one standard and another with a contoured design - influence the contact pressure on the surface of the hands. The procedures included a figure-of-eight shape propulsion task on a regular floor, using both models on a wheelchair. A pressure-mapping system coupled with a pair of fabric gloves recorded the data. The results show that the contoured hand rim provides lower pressure in most of the analysed regions. Considering that manual propulsion is performed during a considerable part of the day as a routine activity, improving the hand rim interface may benefit the user's comfort and safety during wheelchair use. Practitioner summary: The design of the hand rim used in wheelchair propulsion influences the contact pressure on the hands. Conventional round tube rims tend to concentrate high levels of pressure on the distal phalanges and metacarpal regions. A contoured design generally provides better stability and promotes the distribution of pressure. Abbreviations: AT: assistive technology; kPa: kilopascal.

The effect of a novel square-profile hand rim on propulsion technique of wheelchair tennis players

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a square-profile hand rim (SPR) on propulsion technique of wheelchair tennis players. Eight experienced wheelchair tennis players performed two sets of three submaximal exercise tests and six sprint tests on a wheelchair ergometer, once with a regular rim (RR) and once with a SPR. Torque and velocity were measured continuously and power output and timing variables were calculated. No significant differences were found in propulsion technique between the RR and SPR during the submaximal tests. When sprinting with the racket, the SPR showed a significantly lower overall speed (9.1 vs. 9.8 m s^-1), maximal speed (10.5 vs. 11.4 m s^-1), and maximal acceleration (18.6 vs. 10.9 m s^-2). The SPR does not seem to improve the propulsion technique when propelling a wheelchair with a tennis racket in the hand. However, the results gave input for new hand rim designs for wheelchair tennis.

Design of a Robotic System to Measure Propulsion Work of Over-Ground Wheelchair Maneuvers

A wheelchair-propelling robot has been developed to measure the efficiency of manual wheelchairs. The use of a robot has certain advantages compared to the use of human operators with respect to repeatability of measurements and the ability to compare many more wheelchair configurations than possible with human operators. Its design and implementation required significant engineering and validation of hardware and control systems. The robot can propel a wheelchair according to pre-programmed accelerations and velocities and measures the forces required to achieve these maneuvers. Wheel velocities were within 0.1 m/s of programmed values and coefficients of variation . Torque measurements were also repeatable with . By determining the propulsion torque required to propel the wheelchair through a series of canonical maneuvers, task-dependent input work for various wheelchairs and configurations can be compared. This metric would serve to quantify the combined inertial and frictional resistance of the mechanical system.

Measurement of hand/handrim grip forces in two different one arm drive wheelchairs

Purpose. The aim of this study was to explore the total and regional grip forces in the hand when propelling two different manual one arm drive wheelchairs: the Neater Uni-wheelchair (NUW) and a foot steered Action3 wheelchair. Methods. 17 nondisabled users were randomly assigned to each wheelchair to drive around an indoor obstacle course. The Grip, a multiple sensor system taking continuous measurement of handgrip force, was attached to the propelling hand. Total grip force in each region of the hand and total grip force across the whole hand were calculated per user per wheelchair. Results. The Action3 with foot steering only generated significantly greater total grip force in straight running compared to the NUW and also in the fingers and thumb in straight running. Conclusions. The results suggest that the Action3 with foot steering generated greater grip forces which may infer a greater potential for repetitive strain injury in the upper limb. Further work is required to explore whether the difference in grip force is of clinical significance in a disabled population.

Aspects of manual wheelchair configuration affecting mobility: a review

Many aspects relating to equipment configuration affect users' actions in a manual wheelchair, determining the overall mobility performance. Since the equipment components and configuration determine both stability and mobility efficiency, configuring the wheelchair with the most appropriate set-up for individual users' needs is a difficult task. Several studies have shown the importance of seat/backrest assembly and the relative position of the rear wheels to the user in terms of the kinetics and kinematics of manual propulsion. More recently, new studies have brought to light evidence on the inertial properties of different wheelchair configurations. Further new studies have highlighted the handrim as a key component of wheelchair assembly, since it is the interface through which the user drives the chair. In light of the new evidence on wheelchair mechanics and propulsion kinetics and kinematics, this article presents a review of the most important aspects of wheelchair configuration that affect the users' actions and mobility.

Design and development of solar power-assisted manual/electric wheelchair

Wheelchairs are an essential assistive device for many individuals with injury or disability. Manual wheelchairs provide a relatively low-cost solution to the mobility needs of such individuals. Furthermore, they provide an effective means of improving the user's cardiopulmonary function and upper-limb muscle strength. However, manual wheelchairs have a loss gross mechanical efficiency, and thus the risk of user fatigue and upper-limb injury is increased. Electric-powered wheelchairs reduce the risk of injury and provide a more convenient means of transportation. However, they have a large physical size and are relatively expensive. Accordingly, the present study utilizes a quality function deployment method to develop a wheelchair with a user-selectable manual/electric propulsion mode and an auxiliary solar power supply system. The auxiliary solar power supply increased the travel range of the wheelchair by approximately 26% compared with that of a wheelchair powered by battery alone. Moreover, the wheelchair has a modular design and can be disassembled and folded for ease of transportation or storage. Overall, the present results suggest that the proposed wheelchair provides an effective and convenient means of meeting the mobility needs of individuals with mobility difficulties.

Force Application During Handcycling and Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion: An Initial Comparison

The aim of the study was to evaluate the external applied forces, the effectiveness of force application and the net shoulder moments of handcycling in comparison with handrim wheelchair propulsion at different inclines. Ten able-bodied men performed standardized exercises on a treadmill at inclines of 1%, 2.5% and 4% with an instrumented handbike and wheelchair that measured three-dimensional propulsion forces. The results showed that during handcycling significantly lower mean forces were applied at inclines of 2.5% (P< .001) and 4% (P< .001) and significantly lower peak forces were applied at all inclines (1%:P= .014, 2.5% and 4%:P< .001). At the 2.5% incline, where power output was the same for both devices, total forces (mean over trial) of 22.8 N and 27.5 N and peak forces of 40.1 N and 106.9 N were measured for handbike and wheelchair propulsion. The force effectiveness did not differ between the devices (P= .757); however, the effectiveness did increase with higher inclines during handcycling whereas it stayed constant over all inclines for wheelchair propulsion. The resulting peak net shoulder moments were lower for handcycling compared with wheelchair propulsion at all inclines (P< .001). These results confirm the assumption that handcycling is physically less straining.

The effects of rear-wheel camber on the kinematics of upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion

Background

The rear-wheel camber, defined as the inclination of the rear wheels, is usually used in wheelchair sports, but it is becoming increasingly employed in daily propulsion. Although the rear-wheel camber can increase stability, it alters physiological performance during propulsion. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of rear-wheel cambers on temporal-spatial parameters, joint angles, and propulsion patterns.

Methods

Twelve inexperienced subjects (22.3±1.6 yr) participated in the study. None had musculoskeletal disorders in their upper extremities. An eight-camera motion capture system was used to collect the three-dimensional trajectory data of markers attached to the wheelchair-user system during propulsion. All participants propelled the same wheelchair, which had an instrumented wheel with cambers of 0°, 9°, and 15°, respectively, at an average velocity of 1 m/s.

Results

The results show that the rear-wheel camber significantly affects the average acceleration, maximum end angle, trunk movement, elbow joint movement, wrist joint movement, and propulsion pattern. The effects are especially significant between 0° and 15°. For a 15° camber, the average acceleration and joint peak angles significantly increased (p < 0.01). A single loop pattern (SLOP) was adopted by most of the subjects.

Conclusions

The rear-wheel camber affects propulsion patterns and joint range of motion. When choosing a wheelchair with camber adjustment, the increase of joint movements and the base of support should be taken into consideration.

Effect of workload setting on propulsion technique in handrim wheelchair propulsion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of workload setting (speed at constant power, method to impose power) on the propulsion technique (i.e. force and timing characteristics) in handrim wheelchair propulsion.

METHOD

Twelve able-bodied men participated in this study. External forces were measured during handrim wheelchair propulsion on a motor driven treadmill at different velocities and constant power output (to test the forced effect of speed) and at power outputs imposed by incline vs. pulley system (to test the effect of method to impose power). Outcome measures were the force and timing variables of the propulsion technique.

RESULTS

FEF and timing variables showed significant differences between the speed conditions when propelling at the same power output (p < 0.01). Push time was reduced while push angle increased. The method to impose power only showed slight differences in the timing variables, however not in the force variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers and clinicians must be aware of testing and evaluation conditions that may differently affect propulsion technique parameters despite an overall constant power output.

Upper extremity biomechanical model for evaluation of pediatric joint demands during wheelchair mobility

Current methods for evaluating upper extremity (UE) dynamics during pediatric wheelchair use are limited. We propose a new model to characterize UE joint kinematics and kinetics during pediatric wheelchair mobility. The bilateral model is comprised of the thorax, clavicle, scapula, upper arm, forearm, and hand segments. The modeled joints include: sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, elbow and wrist. The model is complete and is currently undergoing pilot studies for clinical application. Results may provide considerable quantitative insight into pediatric UE joint dynamics to improve wheelchair prescription, training and long term care of children with orthopaedic disabilities.

Upper limb joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion in patients with different levels of spinal cord injury

The purpose of this study was to compare the forces and moments of the whole upper limb, analyzing forces and moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints simultaneously during manual wheelchair propulsion of persons with different levels of spinal cord injury (SCI) on a treadmill. Fifty-one people participated in this study and were grouped by their level of SCI: C6 tetraplegia (G1), C7 tetraplegia (G2), high paraplegia (G3), and low paraplegia (G4). An inverse dynamic model was defined to compute net joint forces and moments from segment kinematics, the forces acting on the pushrim, and subject anthropometrics. Right side, upper limb kinematic data were collected with four camcorders (Kinescan-IBV). Kinetic data were recorded by replacing the wheels with SmartWheels (Three Rivers Holdings, LLC). All participants propelled the wheelchair at 3km/h for 1min. The most noteworthy findings in both our tetraplegic groups in relation to paraplegic groups were increased superior joint forces in the shoulder (G1 and G2 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 and G2 vs G4 p<0.01), elbow (G1 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 vs G4 p<0.05) and wrist (G1 vs G4 p<0.001), an increased adduction moment in the shoulder (G1 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 vs G4 p<0.01; G2 vs G3 and G4 p<0.05) and the constancy of the moments of force of the wrist the fact that they reached their lowest values in the tetraplegic groups. This pattern may increase the risk of developing upper limb overuse injuries in tetraplegic subjects.

Upper-limb joint power and its distribution in spinal cord injured wheelchair users: steady-state self-selected speed versus maximal acceleration trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare upper-limb joint power magnitude and distribution between the shoulder, elbow, and wrist during maximal acceleration (MAC) versus steady-state, self-selected speed (SSS) manual wheelchair propulsion.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional biomechanic study.

SETTING

Research university and teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteer sample of 13 manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury below T1.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Propulsive joint power magnitude and fractional distribution among upper-limb joints.

RESULTS

Wilcoxon signed-rank testing revealed shoulder power was larger for MAC versus SSS (median peak, 101.5W; interquartile range [IQR], 74.6; median peak, 37.7W; IQR, 22.9; respectively) (P<.01). Elbow and wrist power were unchanged. Peak shoulder power fraction was larger for MAC versus SSS (median peak, 1.055; IQR, .110 vs peak, .870; IQR, .252) (P<.01). Peak elbow power fraction was smaller for MAC versus SSS (median peak, -.012; IQR, .144 vs peak, .146; IQR, .206) (P<.05). Peak wrist power fraction was smaller for MAC versus SSS (median peak, -.058; IQR, .057 vs peak, -.010; IQR, .150) (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Power at the shoulder was larger than at other joints. Peak shoulder joint power and power fraction was larger during MAC versus SSS propulsion. Elbow and wrist power fractions were smaller for MAC versus SSS propulsion. Higher joint power, present under MAC, may predispose manual wheelchair users to injury, particularly at the shoulder.

General Uncertainty Analysis for Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Dynamics and Development of an Instrumented Wheel

Manual wheelchair propulsion (MWP) is an inefficient and physically straining process. A reliably fabricated and instrumented wheel can help researchers to accurately calculate the forces and moments exerted by the wheelchair users and propose strategies to improve MWP. In this study, an instrumented wheel is designed, fabricated, and validated by using general uncertainty analysis. A six-component transducer is used to measure three-dimensional forces and moments applied by the wheelchair user on the handrim. The output of the transducer are forces and moments, which are directly transmitted to a PC using a USB port. By developing the transformation equations, the actual forces and moments on the hand of the wheelchair user are calculated. The angular position of the hand on the handrim is calculated from the kinetic data obtained through the instrumented wheel, and the derived equations. The general uncertainty analysis method is used to calculate the uncertainty values for the variables of interest with the Taylor series expansions. An analysis of the results shows that it is possible to obtain reliable information for MWP by using the instrumented wheel. Most of the data have uncertainties under 5% during much of the propulsion phase, and the patterns and overall behavior of the results are comparable to published data.

Investigation of the Performance of an Ergonomic Handrim as a Pain-Relieving Intervention for Manual Wheelchair Users

Manual wheelchair users commonly experience pain in their hands and wrists associated with the repetitive stress of propulsion. The objective of this research was to examine the effect of an ergonomic wheelchair handrim as an intervention designed to reduce pain in the hands and wrists and improve functional outcomes for manual wheelchair users. Three studies were conducted to achieve this objective. In the first study, 10 individuals with paraplegia underwent a biomechanical analysis before and after a 2-week practice period with a Natural-Fit (NF) prototype ergonomic handrim. The biomechanical results showed that grip moments were reduced with the NF handrim prototype as compared with the subjects' current handrim (p < .1). Other biomechanical findings were mixed. In the second study, 46 manual wheelchair users who replaced their standard handrim with the commercially available NF handrim completed a questionnaire of retrospective measures of symptom severity. Average duration of use of the NF was 6 months. When asked to compare propelling with the NF to propelling with their prior handrims, 85% of respondents reported less pain in their hands and 80% reported less pain in their wrists. The third study was a replication and extension of Study 2: 82 manual wheelchair users who replaced their standard handrim with the NF completed retrospective symptom severity and functional status scales after using the NF for an average of 9 months. Results again confirmed that using the NF led to a reduction in the severity of symptoms and to improved functional outcomes.

The Effect of Visual Biofeedback on the Propulsion Effectiveness of Experienced Wheelchair Users

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of visual feedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced manual wheelchair users.

DESIGN

Controlled trial.

SETTING

A motion analysis laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 16 healthy men and 2 healthy women with T4-L2 traumatic paraplegia, a mean age of 38+/-9 years, and a mean duration of manual wheelchair-based mobility of 14+/-8 years.

INTERVENTION

Propulsion was assessed as the subjects propelled an instrumented wheelchair (with and without visual biofeedback) on a custom-built dynamometer at propulsion intensities of .15 and .25W/kg for 10 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome variable was the fraction of effective force (FEF) (ie, the ratio of effective to total force) applied by the subject to the wheelchair's pushrim. Secondary variables included velocity, stroke frequency, and stroke angle.

RESULTS

A 2-factor analysis of variance with repeated measurements was used to detect significant differences between the outcome variables. The FEF ratio was 73.9% without feedback and 72.5% with feedback at the lower-intensity level. Propulsion during the higher intensity condition both with and without feedback resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the FEF (73.9%-78.7% with no feedback, 72.5%-80.2% with feedback), compared with the lower-intensity level. Stroke angle increased from 84.3 degrees to 98.7 degrees and frequency decreased from 66 to 57.8 strokes/min with feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual biofeedback may have little utility in improving the force effectiveness of manual wheelchair propulsion in experienced wheelchair users. Experienced wheelchair users may have already optimized their stroke in a manner that balances energy expenditure with stroke efficiency. Other variables such as stroke length and frequency may be more amenable to visual biofeedback.

Effect of handrim diameter on manual wheelchair propulsion: mechanical energy and power flow analysis

BACKGROUND

Wheelchair design parameters such as handrim diameter could affect propulsion. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of handrim size (0.54, 0.43, and 0.32 m) on mechanical energy and power flow during wheelchair propulsion.

METHODS

Twelve young normal male adults (mean age 23.5 years old) were recruited in this study. Both 3-D kinematic and kinetic data of the upper extremity were collected synchronously using a Hi-Res Expert Vision motion system and an instrumented wheel during wheelchair propulsion.

FINDINGS

The kinetic, potential and total mechanical energy of the upper extremity increased as the handrim size increased. For each upper arm segment, the joint translational power and the rotational power of the proximal joint increased with increasing handrim size. The work done during a complete propulsion cycle with the larger handrim size is significantly larger than that using a smaller handrim (P<0.05).

INTERPRETATION

The increased kinetic, potential and total mechanical energy were due to the increased linear velocity and the elevated positions of the upper extremity segments. The shoulder and trunk flexors increased the magnitude of their concentric contractions during propulsion with the large handrim as increased output power is required. By using mechanical energy and power flow analysis techniques, we evaluated the previously-reported effect of handrim size on mechanical cost and provided insight into the relationship between the two.

Hand rim configuration: effects on physical strain and technique in unimpaired subjects?

OBJECTIVE

Hand rim wheelchair propulsion is inefficient and physically straining. To evaluate the possibly advantageous role in this respect of three different prototype hand rim configurations (a rubber foam-coated cylindrical (II) hand rim and two profiled rubber foam-coated hand rims (wide and narrow: III, IV)), a group of 10 unimpaired subjects conducted four submaximal discontinuous wheelchair exercise tests on a computer-controlled wheelchair ergometer, thus allowing a comparison with a standard hand rim (chromium-plated round hand rim (I)).

METHODS

Apart from physiological measures (oxygen uptake, heart rate (HR), ventilation, mechanical efficiency (ME)), a subjective score for the rating of each of the hand rims was determined, as well as characteristics of the force application in the propulsion phase during each test condition. Timing parameters of the push and recovery phase were determined. Each exercise test was conducted with one of the four hand rim configurations in a counter-balanced order.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance with repeated measures (hand rim configuration, power output) revealed no significant effects (P>0.05) on any of the physiological parameters and force application characteristics for the main factor 'hand rim configuration'. Only the subjective score (scale 0-10) for rating of the hand rims proved significantly different between the round rubber (7.5+/-0.53) coated hand rim-receiving the highest score-versus the narrow rubber-coated flat profiled hand rim (5.5+/-1.72).

DISCUSSION

In this subject group and under the selected tasks and submaximal conditions of wheelchair propulsion, the studied hand rim configurations did not introduce critical shifts in the technique of (de-)coupling and power production in the push phase. As a consequence, no systematic shifts in ME are found among the different hand rim configurations. It is suggested that the biological constraints of the task overrule the possible effects of small design variations of the different hand rim configurations within the studied subject group and under the limited test conditions. The hand rim design characteristics may however be much more critical in (1) experienced wheelchair users, (2) especially those subjects with a limited hand-arm and/or trunk function and/or (3) under much more extreme conditions of daily wheelchair ambulation (i.e. turning, stopping/starting, negotiating a slope) or during peak performance. These issues clearly require continued future research. As such, the current results can be viewed as preliminary results only.

Consequence of feedback-based learning of an effective hand rim wheelchair force production on mechanical efficiency

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of the effect of visual feedback on effective hand rim wheelchair force production and the subsequent effect on gross mechanical efficiency.

DESIGN

Ten subjects in an experimental group and 10 subjects in a control group practised three weeks (3.wk(-1), i.e., a pre-test and 8 trials) on a computer-controlled wheelchair ergometer. Every trial consisted of two blocks of 4 min at 0.15 and 0.25 W.kg(-1) at 1.11 m.s(-1). On three trials an additional block at 0.40 W.kg(-1) was performed. The experimental group practised with and the control group practised without visual feedback on the effectiveness of force production.

BACKGROUND

In mechanical terms, the low gross mechanical efficiency of hand rim wheelchair propulsion may be the result of ineffective force production.

METHODS

During all trials oxygen uptake, power output, forces and torque on the hand rims were measured.

RESULTS

In comparison with the control group, the experimental group at trial 8 had a significantly more effective force production compared to the control group (90-97% vs. 79-83%, respectively), but showed a significantly lower mechanical efficiency (5.5-8.5% vs. 5.9-9.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that the most effective force production from a mechanical point of view is not necessarily the most efficient way--in terms of energy cost-- from a biological point of view and that force direction is based on an optimization of cost and effect.

RELEVANCE

Learning a more effective force production by visual feedback is not useful for increasing the mechanical efficiency of hand rim wheelchair propulsion.

Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mechanical load on the glenohumeral joint and on shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion at everyday intensities.

DESIGN

Model simulations based on experimental input dataBackground. Virtually nothing is known about the mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion. Hand rim wheelchair propulsion is a significant risk factor for shoulder pain and injury among wheelchair users. A musculoskeletal model of the upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion will quantify the stresses placed on anatomic structures and may provide insight into the source of symptoms and injuries.

METHODS

Three experienced wheelchair users underwent wheelchair exercise tests at combinations of two load levels (10 and 20 W) and two velocities (0.83 and 1.39m.s(-1)) during which input data were collected for a musculoskeletal model of the upper extremity. The model was then used for the estimation of the glenohumeral contact force, as well as individual muscle forces.

RESULTS

Peak glenohumeral contact forces were between 800 and 1400 N (100-165% body weight) and differed significantly between load levels. Averaged over the push phase, these forces were 500-850 N. In absolute terms the m. deltoideus and rotator cuff muscles were highly active (>100N). In relative terms the load on the m. supraspinatus was high, with peak values of over 50% of its maximum attainable force.

CONCLUSIONS

Low intensity wheelchair propulsion does not appear to lead to high contact forces. The muscle forces in the rotator cuff and especially in the m. supraspinatus are high. This might indicate a risk for muscle damage and the subsequent development of shoulder complaints, such as rotator cuff tears.

RELEVANCE

Within the wheelchair user population, there is a high prevalence of upper extremity complaints. Not much is known about the causes of those complaints. Wheelchair propulsion is likely to be a major risk factor. If the (nature of this) mechanical load can be identified, specific exercise programs and/or design changes can be better tuned to prevent overuse injuries.

Biomechanics of manual wheelchair propulsion in elderly: system tilt and back recline angles

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the system tilt and back recline angles on the biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion for a group of older, disabled patients. It was hypothesized that increasing both the system tilt and backrest recline angles would have a positive effect on the biomechanical efficiency of manual wheelchair propulsion.

DESIGN

Three kinetic variables were estimated during a 10-m, steady-state propulsion between 0.96 m/sec and 1.01 m/sec. The fraction of the mechanical effective force is defined by the ratio between the tangential and the total force applied to the pushrim: It expresses the directionality of force application. The mechanical use is defined as the ratio between the total force generated during wheelchair propulsion and that generated during maximal isometric contraction. The biomechanical efficiency is defined as the product of mechanical effective force and the mechanical use.

RESULTS

On average, the fraction of the mechanical effective force was found to be low when compared with other studies. Tilting the system by 10 degrees and reclining the back by 10 degrees increase significantly the biomechanical efficiency of the subject by 10%. The biomechanical efficiency variable was more sensitive to the system tilt than to the back recline adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm the hypothesis that system tilt angle but not back recline significantly affects biomechanical efficiency. The findings of this study will help in designing and adjusting a wheelchair intended for self-propelled, older people.

Mechanical efficiency and user power requirement with a pushrim activated power assisted wheelchair

The objective of this study was to quantify the difference in mechanical efficiency and user power generation between traditional manual wheelchairs and a pushrim activated power assisted wheelchair (PAPAW). Ten manual wheelchair users were evaluated in a repeated measures design trial with and without the PAPAW for propulsion efficiency. Subjects propelled a Quickie GP equipped with the PAPAW and their own chair on a computer controlled wheelchair dynamometer at five different resistance levels. Power output, user power with the PAPAW hubs, subjects' oxygen consumption per minute and mechanical efficiency were analyzed. Metabolic energy and user power were significantly lower (p<0.05), and mechanical efficiency significantly higher with the PAPAW than with subjects' own chairs. Subjects needed to generate on average 3.65 times more power when propelling their own wheelchairs as compared to PAPAW. Mean mechanical efficiency over all trials was 80.33% higher with the power assisted hubs. PAPAW provides on average 73% of the total power when subjects propel with power assistance. Significantly increased efficiency and reduced requirement of user power is achieved using the PAPAW. With use, the PAPAW may contribute to delaying secondary injuries of manual wheelchair users. In addition, it may be suitable for people who have (or at risk for) upper extremity joint degeneration, reduced exercise capacity, low strength or endurance who currently use electric powered wheelchairs.

Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion

Manual wheelchair propulsion in daily life and sports is increasingly being studied. Initially, an engineering and physiological perspective was taken. More recently a concomitant biomechanics interest is seen. Themes of biomechanical and physiological studies today are performance enhancing aspects of wheelchair use and the ergonomics of wheelchair design. Apart from the propulsion technique the focus of biomechanics research of manual wheelchair propulsion is mainly towards injury mechanisms, especially phenomena of overuse to the upper extremity. Obviously, the vehicle mechanics of wheelchairs must be included within this biological framework. Scientific research is progressing, but is still hampered by methodological limitations, such as the heterogeneity and small numbers of the population at study as well as the inconsistency of employed technologies and methodologies. There is a need for consensus regarding methodology and research strategy, and a strong need for collaboration to improve the homogeneity and size of subject groups and thus the power of the experimental results. Thus a sufficiently strong knowledge database will emerge, leading to an evidence-base of performance enhancing factors and the understanding of the risks of wheelchair sports and long-term wheelchair use. In the light of the current biomechanical and physiological knowledge of manual wheelchair propulsion there seems to be a need for the stimulation of other than hand rim propelled manual wheelchairs.

Comparison of three different models to represent the wrist during wheelchair propulsion

Due to the high incidence of secondary wrist injury among manual wheelchair users, recent emphasis has been placed on the investigation of wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. Accurate representation of wrist activity during wheelchair propulsion may help to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the development of wrist injuries. Unfortunately, no consensual wrist biomechanical model has been established. In order to determine if different methodologies obtain similar results, this investigation created and compared three different wrist models: 1) a fixed joint center placed between the styloids (midstyloid joint center); 2) a joint center with 2 degrees of freedom computed from de Leva's joint center data; and 3) a floating joint center. Results indicate that wrist flexion and extension angles are highly consistent between models, however, radial and ulnar deviation angles vary considerably. Mean maximum right flexion angles were found to be 3.5 degrees, 2.2 degrees, and 5.0 degrees for the midstyloid, de Leva, and floating joint center models, respectively. Extension angles were 22.3 degrees, 23.6 degrees, and 23.6 degrees, respectively. Mean maximum right radial deviation angles for the midstyloid, de Leva, and floating joint center models were 26.0 degrees, 26.9 degrees, and 45.1 degrees, respectively, and ulnar deviation angles were found to be 30.5 degrees, 38.8 degrees, and 10.2 degrees, respectively. This information is useful when comparing kinematic studies and further supports the need for consensual methodology.

A kinetic analysis of trained wheelchair racers during two speeds of propulsion

The purpose of the study was to investigate the propulsion kinetics of wheelchair racers at racing speeds and to assess how these change with an increase in speed. It was hypothesised that propulsive force would increase in proportion to speed, to accommodate the additional work required. Six wheelchair racers volunteered to participate in this study which required each athlete to push a racing wheelchair at 4.70 and 5.64 m s(-1) on a wheelchair ergometer (WERG). Eight pairs (16 in total) of strain gauges, mounted on four bars attached to the hand-rim of a racing wheelchair wheel, measured the medio-lateral and tangential forces applied to the hand-rim. Kinetic data were sampled at 200 Hz while a single on-line (ELITE) infrared camera operating at 100 Hz was positioned perpendicular to the WERG to record the location of the hand with respect to the hand-rim. In general, peak tangential force occurred when the hand was positioned on the hand-rim between 140 and 180 degrees. With the increase in speed, the peak hand-rim forces applied tangentially increased from 132 to 158 N and those applied medio-laterally increased from 90 to 104 N. The ratio of tangential to total measured force was similar at both speeds (80 and 82%, respectively). In conclusion, these data indicate that wheelchair racers adopt a different propulsion strategy than that employed in everyday chairs and that the forces increase in proportion to propulsion speed.

Frequency analysis of kinematics of racing wheelchair propulsion

The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency content of racing wheelchair propulsion motion data. The selection of the filter corner frequency in previous kinematic analyses of manual wheelchair propulsion was commonly based on gait literature. An estimate of the frequency separating the signal and the noise was determined to make recommendations for low-pass digital filters. The global (noncoordinate specific) cutoff frequency was 6 Hz. The directional cutoff frequencies were 5.1, 3.9, and 5.6 Hz, in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior and medial-lateral directions, respectively. Recommendations for the corner frequencies of low-pass Butterworth digital filters based on the cutoff frequency are higher than the corner frequencies used in previous studies of manual wheelchair propulsion kinematic data. This study provides a foundation for the data reduction of manual wheelchair propulsion kinematic data that is independent of gait literature.

Glenohumeral joint kinematics and kinetics for three coordinate system representations during wheelchair propulsion

The shoulder plays a very important role during manual wheelchair propulsion. Unfortunately, substantial numbers of manual wheelchair users eventually develop shoulder injury or pain. Recently, studies have begun to investigate the etiology of wheelchair user shoulder injuries. This study compared three coordinate systems used to represent the shoulder during wheelchair propulsion. Our results show statistically significant differences between the three shoulder representations analyzed. Differences are seen for individuals and for the subjects as a group. Based upon our results, the fixed-z model appears preferable over the other representations due to its simplicity, low hardware requirements, and the similarity of the results to the free representation. This article also provides some insight into maximal shoulder joint forces and moments recorded during manual wheelchair propulsion. Future work should include more sophisticated models of the shoulder complex.

Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function

OBJECTIVES

Individuals who use manual wheelchairs are at high risk for median nerve injury and subsequent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). To gain a better understanding of the mechanism behind CTS in manual wheelchair users, this study examined the relation between (1) pushrim biomechanics and function of the median nerve, (2) pushrim biomechanics and subject characteristics, and (3) median nerve function and subject characteristics.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory and an electromyography laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four randomly recruited individuals with paraplegia who use a manual wheelchair for mobility.

INTERVENTION

Subjects propelled their own wheelchair on a dynamometer at 0.9m/sec and 1.8m/sec. Bilateral biomechanical data were obtained using a force- and moment-sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system. Bilateral nerve conduction studies focusing on the median nerve were also completed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pearson's correlation coefficients between subject characteristics, median nerve conduction studies, and propulsion biomechanics; a regression model of nerve conduction studies incorporating subject characteristics and pushrim biomechanics.

RESULTS

Subject weight was significantly related to median nerve latency (r = .36, p = .03) and median sensory amplitude (r = -.43, p = .01). Height was also significantly related to median sensory amplitude (r = -.58, p = .01). Subject weight was significantly related to the peak resultant force applied to the pushrim (r = .59, p < .001). Height, weight, and weight-normalized pushrim forces were successfully incorporated into a linear regression model predicting median sensory amplitude (r = .63, p < .05) and mean median latency (r = .54, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study found subject weight to be related to pushrim forces and median nerve function. Independent of subject weight, pushrim biomechanics were also related to median nerve function. Through weight loss and changes in pushrim biomechanics, it may be possible to prevent median nerve injury in manual wheelchair users.

Effectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries

The objective of this study was to investigate effectiveness of force application, the ratio power output/energy expenditure, and timing parameters of wheelchair propulsion in persons with tetraplegia (TP, n=17) and paraplegia (PP, n=12), at two different intensity conditions. All subjects performed a maximal exercise test on a wheelchair ergometer. Exercise bouts with an intensity of 30 to 50% and 60 to 80% of the maximal power output were analyzed. Effectiveness of force application, defined as the ratio of the effective force and the total force, was considerably lower in TP, compared with PP. Effectiveness of force application in the plane of the wheel was comparable between TP and PP. TP showed a significantly lower effectiveness of force application in the frontal plane and applied the forces in a more lateromedial direction to the hand rim. The ratio power output/energy expenditure, calculated as an indication of gross mechanical efficiency, was considerably lower in TP and was associated with the effectiveness of force application (r=0.64; P < 0.01). Timing parameters showed that TP positioned their hands in a more backward position on the hand rim. Comparing the different intensity conditions revealed that force was applied more effectively, and the ratio power output/energy expenditure was higher at the higher intensity condition. Push time, relative to cycle time, increased, and beginning angle showed a forward shift with a higher load. TP tended to decrease, whereas PP showed a tendency for an increase in stroke angle with a higher load. The low effectiveness and different pattern of force application in TP should be taken into account when developing other wheelchair propelling mechanisms and training programs for this population.

Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis

Wheelchair sports and daily manual wheelchair propulsion are dominated by frequent short-term power demands. The purpose of the current cross-sectional study was to determine the variation in propulsion technique in association with sprint power production among elite wheelchair athletes. Therefore, 67 wheelchair athletes (different impairments; 17 female and 50 male athletes; age, 29.1+/-7 yr; body weight, 60.7+/-11.8 kg; training hours, 12.9+/-6.4 h x wk(-1); VO2 peak, 1.7+/-0.7 liter x min(-1); aerobic power output, 72.2+/-36.7 W) were studied during the World Championships and Games for the Disabled in Assen (1990) on propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in a 30-s sprint test on a computer controlled wheelchair ergometer. Mean power output (P30) (97+/-45.8 W; range, 8.3-195.3 W) and heart rate (158.6+/-23.6 b x min(-1)) were highly variable and seemed associated with impairment level: track athletes, classified in four different functional classes, showed a class-related P30 of 23, 68, 100, and 138 W for the male athletes (n=38). Sprint power relative to body weight varied between 0.36 W X kg BW(-1)+/-0.04 and 1.85 W X kg BW(-1)+/-0.43 for the different subject groups. Propulsion technique in terms of forces applied to the rim and timing showed significant differences between subject groups for the majority of parameters studied. Apart from the mediolateral force and the negative dip at the start of the push phase, the technique parameters were significantly related to power production. Fraction effective force, the ratio between the total force vector and the effective force applied to the hand rim, appeared low on average (especially for subjects with cerebral palsy and those with a high spinal lesion) but showed a significant correlation with power output (r=0.5). In general, propulsion technique parameters were related to both performance and functionality. The number of training hours showed a small but significant relation with peak power (r=0.31), peak torque (r=0.4), the amount of work per push (r=0.41) and the total force vector (r=0.31), stressing the role of training status, next to disability, as important mediating factor in both propulsion technique as well as performance capacity. No association between training hours and fraction effective force was seen. It can be concluded that propulsion technique and performance parameters are highly variable among wheelchair athletes. Also, propulsion technique is strongly associated with functionality and training hours and does clearly relate to performance. The current results on technique and performance and their possible causal relationship, but also with impairment and sports discipline, must be further substantiated in a longitudinal study design.

The effect of wheelchair handrim tube diameter on propulsion efficiency and force application (tube diameter and efficiency in wheelchairs)

To determine the optimum tube diameter of a standard handrim-propelled wheelchair, the effect of tube size and shape on physiological and kinetic parameters was studied. Six able-bodied male subjects performed two tests on a wheelchair ergometer. Tests were performed against work loads comparable to every day use and with two different handrim tube diameters, a handrim with an oval 25 by 30 mm diameter (LR) and one with an 18 mm diameter (SR). The large tube diameter (LR) yielded slightly but significantly lower values for the physiological parameters. Gross mechanical efficiency was on average 7% for the LR and 6.3% for the SR. No significant results were found for force application parameters related to the direction of the applied force or the torque by the hand onto the handrim surface. As technique parameters could not explain the higher mechanical efficiency (ME) when using the LR, it is suggested that hand grip constraints in the push phase (finger flexor activity) might be responsible. Another possible explanation is that with a better hand grip using LR, less stabilization by the larger muscle groups at the elbow and shoulder is needed. The measured technique parameters seem to be determined by geometric constraints of the arm and shoulder. The technique requirements resulting from the forced trajectory of the propulsion movement are also likely to determine the technique parameters. Regarding the low mechanical efficiency of handrim propulsion, which is partly caused by the forced unfavorable trajectory of the hand, an alternative propulsion mechanism is suggested.