1
|
Agrawal B, Boulos S, Khatib S, Feuermann Y, Panov J, Kaphzan H. Molecular Insights into Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects: Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analyses. Cells 2024; 13:205. [PMID: 38334596 PMCID: PMC10854682 DOI: 10.3390/cells13030205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an evolving non-invasive neurostimulation technique. Despite multiple studies, its underlying molecular mechanisms are still unclear. Several previous human studies of the effect of tDCS suggest that it generates metabolic effects. The induction of metabolic effects by tDCS could provide an explanation for how it generates its long-term beneficial clinical outcome. AIM Given these hints of tDCS metabolic effects, we aimed to delineate the metabolic pathways involved in its mode of action. METHODS To accomplish this, we utilized a broad analytical approach of co-analyzing metabolomics and transcriptomic data generated from anodal tDCS in rat models. Since no metabolomic dataset was available, we performed a tDCS experiment of bilateral anodal stimulation of 200 µA for 20 min and for 5 consecutive days, followed by harvesting the brain tissue below the stimulating electrode and generating a metabolomics dataset using LC-MS/MS. The analysis of the transcriptomic dataset was based on a publicly available dataset. RESULTS Our analyses revealed that tDCS alters the metabolic profile of brain tissue, affecting bioenergetic-related pathways, such as glycolysis and mitochondrial functioning. In addition, we found changes in calcium-related signaling. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that tDCS affects metabolism by modulating energy production-related processes. Given our findings concerning calcium-related signaling, we suggest that the immediate effects of tDCS on calcium dynamics drive modifications in distinct metabolic pathways. A thorough understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of tDCS has the potential to revolutionize its applicability, enabling the generation of personalized medicine in the field of neurostimulation and thus contributing to its optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhanumita Agrawal
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| | - Soad Boulos
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| | - Soliman Khatib
- Department of Biotechnology, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee 1220800, Israel
| | - Yonatan Feuermann
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| | - Julia Panov
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
- Tauber Bioinformatics Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kaphzan
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
- Tauber Bioinformatics Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vasu SO, Kaphzan H. Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Synaptic Facilitation via Distinct Presynaptic Calcium Channels. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16866. [PMID: 38069188 PMCID: PMC10706473 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a subthreshold neurostimulation technique known for ameliorating neuropsychiatric conditions. The principal mechanism of tDCS is the differential polarization of subcellular neuronal compartments, particularly the axon terminals that are sensitive to external electrical fields. Yet, the underlying mechanism of tDCS is not fully clear. Here, we hypothesized that direct current stimulation (DCS)-induced modulation of presynaptic calcium channel conductance alters axon terminal dynamics with regard to synaptic vesicle release. To examine the involvement of calcium-channel subtypes in tDCS, we recorded spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) from cortical layer-V pyramidal neurons under DCS while selectively inhibiting distinct subtypes of voltage-dependent calcium channels. Blocking P/Q or N-type calcium channels occluded the effects of DCS on sEPSCs, demonstrating their critical role in the process of DCS-induced modulation of spontaneous vesicle release. However, inhibiting T-type calcium channels did not occlude DCS-induced modulation of sEPSCs, suggesting that despite being active in the subthreshold range, T-type calcium channels are not involved in the axonal effects of DCS. DCS modulates synaptic facilitation by regulating calcium channels in axon terminals, primarily via controlling P/Q and N-type calcium channels, while T-type calcium channels are not involved in this mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanoch Kaphzan
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rogers ER, Mirzakhalili E, Lempka SF. Model-based analysis of subthreshold mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation for pain. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:066003. [PMID: 37906966 PMCID: PMC10632558 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad0858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a common treatment for chronic pain. For decades, SCS maximized overlap between stimulation-induced paresthesias and the patient's painful areas. Recently developed SCS paradigms relieve pain at sub-perceptible amplitudes, yet little is known about the neural response to these new waveforms or their analgesic mechanisms of action. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the neural response to multiple forms of paresthesia-free SCS.Approach.We used computational modeling to investigate the neurophysiological effects and the plausibility of commonly proposed mechanisms of three paresthesia-free SCS paradigms: burst, 1 kHz, and 10 kHz SCS. Specifically, in C- and Aβ-fibers, we investigated the effects of different SCS waveforms on spike timing and activation thresholds, as well as how stochastic ion channel gating affects the response of dorsal column axons. Finally, we characterized membrane polarization of superficial dorsal horn neurons.Main results.We found that none of the SCS waveforms activate nor modulate spike timing in C-fibers. Spike timing was modulated in Aβ-fibers only at suprathreshold amplitudes. Ion channel stochasticity had little effect on Aβ-fiber activation thresholds but produced heterogeneous spike timings at suprathreshold amplitudes. Finally, local cells were preferentially polarized in their axon terminals, and the magnitude of this polarization was dependent on cellular morphology and position relative to the stimulation electrodes.Significance.Overall, the mechanisms of action of subparesthetic SCS remain unclear. Our results suggest that no SCS waveforms directly activate C-fibers, and modulation of spike timing is unlikely at subthreshold amplitudes. We conclude that potential subthreshold neuromodulatory effects of SCS on local cells are likely to be presynaptic in nature, as axons are preferentially depolarized during SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan R Rogers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Ehsan Mirzakhalili
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aberra AS, Wang R, Grill WM, Peterchev AV. Multi-scale model of axonal and dendritic polarization by transcranial direct current stimulation in realistic head geometry. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.23.554447. [PMID: 37767087 PMCID: PMC10522328 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.23.554447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation modality that can alter cortical excitability. However, it remains unclear how the subcellular elements of different neuron types are polarized by specific electric field (E-field) distributions. Objective To quantify neuronal polarization generated by tDCS in a multi-scale computational model. Methods We embedded layer-specific, morphologically-realistic cortical neuron models in a finite element model of the E-field in a human head and simulated steady-state polarization generated by conventional primary-motor-cortex-supraorbital (M1-SO) and 4×1 high-definition (HD) tDCS. We quantified somatic, axonal, and dendritic polarization of excitatory pyramidal cells in layers 2/3, 5, and 6, as well as inhibitory interneurons in layers 1 and 4 of the hand knob. Results Axonal and dendritic terminals were polarized more than the soma in all neurons, with peak axonal and dendritic polarization of 0.92 mV and 0.21 mV, respectively, compared to peak somatic polarization of 0.07 mV for 1.8 mA M1-SO stimulation. Both montages generated regions of depolarization and hyperpolarization beneath the M1 anode; M1-SO produced slightly stronger, more diffuse polarization peaking in the central sulcus, while 4×1 HD produced higher peak polarization in the gyral crown. Simulating polarization by uniform local E-field approximated the spatial distribution of tDCS polarization but produced large errors in some regions. Conclusions Polarization of pre- and postsynaptic compartments of excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurons may play a significant role in tDCS neuromodulation. These effects cannot be predicted from the E-field distribution alone but rather require calculation of the neuronal response.
Collapse
|
5
|
Stefanovic F, Martinez JA, Saleem GT, Sisto SA, Miller MT, Achampong YA, Titus AH. A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1114860. [PMID: 37396760 PMCID: PMC10311503 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1114860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper we propose a novel neurostimulation protocol that provides an intervention-based assessment to distinguish the contributions of different motor control networks in the cortico-spinal system. Specifically, we use a combination of non-invasive brain stimulation and neuromuscular stimulation to probe neuromuscular system behavior with targeted impulse-response system identification. In this protocol, we use an in-house developed human-machine interface (HMI) for an isotonic wrist movement task, where the user controls a cursor on-screen. During the task, we generate unique motor evoked potentials based on triggered cortical or spinal level perturbations. Externally applied brain-level perturbations are triggered through TMS to cause wrist flexion/extension during the volitional task. The resultant contraction output and related reflex responses are measured by the HMI. These movements also include neuromodulation in the excitability of the brain-muscle pathway via transcranial direct current stimulation. Colloquially, spinal-level perturbations are triggered through skin-surface neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist muscles. The resultant brain-muscle and spinal-muscle pathways perturbed by the TMS and NMES, respectively, demonstrate temporal and spatial differences as manifested through the human-machine interface. This then provides a template to measure the specific neural outcomes of the movement tasks, and in decoding differences in the contribution of cortical- (long-latency) and spinal-level (short-latency) motor control. This protocol is part of the development of a diagnostic tool that can be used to better understand how interaction between cortical and spinal motor centers changes with learning, or injury such as that experienced following stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Stefanovic
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Julian A. Martinez
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Ghazala T. Saleem
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Sue Ann Sisto
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Michael T. Miller
- UB Department of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Yaa A. Achampong
- UB Department of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Albert H. Titus
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khadka N, Bikson M. Neurocapillary-Modulation. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1299-1311. [PMID: 33340187 PMCID: PMC8213863 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We consider two consequences of brain capillary ultrastructure in neuromodulation. First, blood-brain barrier (BBB) polarization as a consequence of current crossing between interstitial space and the blood. Second, interstitial current flow distortion around capillaries impacting neuronal stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed computational models of BBB ultrastructure morphologies to first assess electric field amplification at the BBB (principle 1) and neuron polarization amplification by the presence of capillaries (principle 2). We adapt neuron cable theory to develop an analytical solution for maximum BBB polarization sensitivity. RESULTS Electrical current crosses between the brain parenchyma (interstitial space) and capillaries, producing BBB electric fields (EBBB) that are >400x of the average parenchyma electric field (ĒBRAIN), which in turn modulates transport across the BBB. Specifically, for a BBB space constant (λBBB) and wall thickness (dth-BBB), the analytical solution for maximal BBB electric field (EABBB) is given as: (ĒBRAIN × λBBB)/dth-BBB. Electrical current in the brain parenchyma is distorted around brain capillaries, amplifying neuronal polarization. Specifically, capillary ultrastructure produces ∼50% modulation of the ĒBRAIN over the ∼40 μm inter-capillary distance. The divergence of EBRAIN (Activating function) is thus ∼100 kV/m2 per unit ĒBRAIN. CONCLUSIONS BBB stimulation by principle 1 suggests novel therapeutic strategies such as boosting metabolic capacity or interstitial fluid clearance. Whereas the spatial profile of EBRAIN is traditionally assumed to depend only on macroscopic anatomy, principle 2 suggests a central role for local capillary ultrastructure-which impact forms of neuromodulation including deep brain stimulation (DBS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)/transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Psychiatry, Laboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rivera-Urbina GN, Martínez-Castañeda MF, Núñez-Gómez AM, Molero-Chamizo A, Nitsche MA, Alameda-Bailén JR. Effects of tDCS applied over the left IFG and pSTG language areas on verb recognition task performance. Psychophysiology 2022; 59:e14134. [PMID: 35780078 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge about the relevance of the left inferior frontal gyrus (lIFG) and the left posterior superior temporal gyrus (lpSTG) in visual recognition of word categories is limited at present. tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that alters cortical activity and excitability, and thus might be a useful tool for delineating the specific impact of both areas on word recognition. The objective of this study was to explore whether the visual recognition process of verb categories is improved by a single tDCS session. lIFG and lpSTG areas were separately modulated by anodal tDCS to evaluate its effects on verbal recognition. Compared to sham stimulation, motor reaction times (RTs) were reduced after anodal tDCS over the lpSTG, and this effect was independent of the performing hand (right/left). These findings suggest that this region is involved in visual word recognition independently from the performing hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Michael A Nitsche
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Halawa I, Reichert K, Aberra AS, Sommer M, Peterchev AV, Paulus W. Effect of Pulse Duration and Direction on Plasticity Induced by 5 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Correlation With Neuronal Depolarization. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:773792. [PMID: 34899173 PMCID: PMC8661453 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.773792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the motor cortex causes an increase in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) that persists after stimulation. Here, we focus on the aftereffects generated by high frequency controllable pulse TMS (cTMS) with different directions, intensities, and pulse durations. Objectives: To investigate the influence of pulse duration, direction, and amplitude in correlation to induced depolarization on the excitatory plastic aftereffects of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using bidirectional cTMS pulses. Methods: We stimulated the hand motor cortex with 5 Hz rTMS applying 1,200 bidirectional pulses with the main component durations of 80, 100, and 120 μs using a controllable pulse stimulator TMS (cTMS). Fourteen healthy subjects were investigated in nine sessions with 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) for posterior-anterior (PA) and 80 and 90% RMT anterior-posterior (AP) induced current direction. We used a model approximating neuronal membranes as a linear first order low-pass filter to estimate the strength–duration time constant and to simulate the membrane polarization produced by each waveform. Results: PA and AP 5 Hz rTMS at 80% RMT produced no significant excitation. An exploratory analysis indicated that 90% RMT AP stimulation with 100 and 120 μs pulses but not 80 μs pulses led to significant excitation. We found a positive correlation between the plastic outcome of each session and the simulated peak neural membrane depolarization for time constants >100 μs. This correlation was strongest for neural elements that are depolarized by the main phase of the AP pulse, suggesting the effects were dependent on pulse direction. Conclusions: Among the tested conditions, only 5 Hz rTMS with higher intensity and wider pulses appeared to produce excitatory aftereffects. This correlated with the greater depolarization of neural elements with time constants slower than the directly activated neural elements responsible for producing the motor output (e.g., somatic or dendritic membrane). Significance: Higher intensities and wider pulses seem to be more efficient in inducing excitation. If confirmed, this observation could lead to better results in future clinical studies performed with wider pulses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam Halawa
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Medical Research Division, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Katharina Reichert
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Aman S Aberra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Martin Sommer
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hordacre B, McCambridge AB, Ridding MC, Bradnam LV. Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance Poststroke Motor Recovery? Development of a Theoretical Patient-Tailored Model. Neurology 2021; 97:170-180. [PMID: 33986136 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
New treatments that can facilitate neural repair and reduce persistent impairments have significant value in promoting recovery following stroke. One technique that has gained interest is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as early research suggested it could enhance plasticity and enable greater behavioral recovery. However, several studies have now identified substantial intersubject variability in response to tDCS and clinical trials revealed insufficient evidence of treatment effectiveness. A possible explanation for the varied and negative findings is that the physiologic model of stroke recovery that researchers have used to guide the application of tDCS-based treatments in stroke is overly simplistic and does not account for stroke heterogeneity or known determinants that affect the tDCS response. Here, we propose that tDCS could have a more clearly beneficial role in enhancing stroke recovery if greater consideration is given to individualizing treatment. By critically reviewing the proposed mechanisms of tDCS, stroke physiology across the recovery continuum, and known determinants of tDCS response, we propose a new, theoretical, patient-tailored approach to delivering tDCS after stroke. The proposed model includes a step-by-step principled selection strategy for identifying optimal neuromodulation targets and outlines key areas for further investigation. Tailoring tDCS treatment to individual neuroanatomy and physiology is likely our best chance at producing robust and meaningful clinical benefit for people with stroke and would therefore accelerate opportunities for clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenton Hordacre
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Alana B McCambridge
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael C Ridding
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lynley V Bradnam
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Korai SA, Ranieri F, Di Lazzaro V, Papa M, Cirillo G. Neurobiological After-Effects of Low Intensity Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Human Nervous System: From Basic Mechanisms to Metaplasticity. Front Neurol 2021; 12:587771. [PMID: 33658972 PMCID: PMC7917202 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.587771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) of the brain is an evolving field that has brought remarkable attention in the past few decades for its ability to directly modulate specific brain functions. Neurobiological after-effects of tES seems to be related to changes in neuronal and synaptic excitability and plasticity, however mechanisms are still far from being elucidated. We aim to review recent results from in vitro and in vivo studies that highlight molecular and cellular mechanisms of transcranial direct (tDCS) and alternating (tACS) current stimulation. Changes in membrane potential and neural synchronization explain the ongoing and short-lasting effects of tES, while changes induced in existing proteins and new protein synthesis is required for long-lasting plastic changes (LTP/LTD). Glial cells, for decades supporting elements, are now considered constitutive part of the synapse and might contribute to the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. This review brings into focus the neurobiological mechanisms and after-effects of tDCS and tACS from in vitro and in vivo studies, in both animals and humans, highlighting possible pathways for the development of targeted therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohaib Ali Korai
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Federico Ranieri
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Papa
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,ISBE Italy, SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cirillo
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chakraborty D, Truong DQ, Bikson M, Kaphzan H. Neuromodulation of Axon Terminals. Cereb Cortex 2019; 28:2786-2794. [PMID: 28655149 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding which cellular compartments are influenced during neuromodulation underpins any rational effort to explain and optimize outcomes. Axon terminals have long been speculated to be sensitive to polarization, but experimentally informed models for CNS stimulation are lacking. We conducted simultaneous intracellular recording from the neuron soma and axon terminal (blebs) during extracellular stimulation with weak sustained (DC) uniform electric fields in mouse cortical slices. Use of weak direct current stimulation (DCS) allowed isolation and quantification of changes in axon terminal biophysics, relevant to both suprathreshold (e.g., deep brain stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation) and subthreshold (e.g., transcranial DCS and transcranial alternating current stimulation) neuromodulation approaches. Axon terminals polarized with sensitivity (mV of membrane polarization per V/m electric field) 4 times than somas. Even weak polarization (<2 mV) of axon terminals significantly changes action potential dynamics (including amplitude, duration, conduction velocity) in response to an intracellular pulse. Regarding a cellular theory of neuromodulation, we explain how suprathreshold CNS stimulation activates the action potential at terminals while subthreshold approaches modulate synaptic efficacy through axon terminal polarization. We demonstrate that by virtue of axon polarization and resulting changes in action potential dynamics, neuromodulation can influence analog-digital information processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dennis Q Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hanoch Kaphzan
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khadka N, Truong DQ, Williams P, Martin JH, Bikson M. The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research. J Neurosci Methods 2019; 328:108446. [PMID: 31589892 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quasi-uniform assumption is a general theory that postulates local electric field predicts neuronal activation. Computational current flow model of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of humans and animal models inform how the quasi-uniform assumption can support scaling neuromodulation dose between humans and translational animal. NEW METHOD Here we developed finite element models of cat and rat SCS, and brain slice, alongside SCS models. Boundary conditions related to species specific electrode dimensions applied, and electric fields per unit current (mA) predicted. RESULTS Clinically and across animal, electric fields change abruptly over small distance compared to the neuronal morphology, such that each neuron is exposed to multiple electric fields. Per unit current, electric fields generally decrease with body mass, but not necessarily and proportionally across tissues. Peak electric field in dorsal column rat and cat were ∼17x and ∼1x of clinical values, for scaled electrodes and equal current. Within the spinal cord, the electric field for rat, cat, and human decreased to 50% of peak value caudo-rostrally (C5-C6) at 0.48 mm, 3.2 mm, and 8 mm, and mediolaterally at 0.14 mm, 2.3 mm, and 3.1 mm. Because these space constants are different, electric field across species cannot be matched without selecting a region of interest (ROI). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD This is the first computational model to support scaling neuromodulation dose between humans and translational animal. CONCLUSIONS Inter-species reproduction of the electric field profile across the entire surface of neuron populations is intractable. Approximating quasi-uniform electric field in a ROI is a rational step to translational scaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Dennis Q Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Preston Williams
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, City University of NY School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10031, USA
| | - John H Martin
- CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, 10031, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, City University of NY School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10031, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang B, Aberra AS, Grill WM, Peterchev AV. Modified cable equation incorporating transverse polarization of neuronal membranes for accurate coupling of electric fields. J Neural Eng 2019; 15:026003. [PMID: 29363622 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8b7c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present a theory and computational methods to incorporate transverse polarization of neuronal membranes into the cable equation to account for the secondary electric field generated by the membrane in response to transverse electric fields. The effect of transverse polarization on nonlinear neuronal activation thresholds is quantified and discussed in the context of previous studies using linear membrane models. APPROACH The response of neuronal membranes to applied electric fields is derived under two time scales and a unified solution of transverse polarization is given for spherical and cylindrical cell geometries. The solution is incorporated into the cable equation re-derived using an asymptotic model that separates the longitudinal and transverse dimensions. Two numerical methods are proposed to implement the modified cable equation. Several common neural stimulation scenarios are tested using two nonlinear membrane models to compare thresholds of the conventional and modified cable equations. MAIN RESULTS The implementations of the modified cable equation incorporating transverse polarization are validated against previous results in the literature. The test cases show that transverse polarization has limited effect on activation thresholds. The transverse field only affects thresholds of unmyelinated axons for short pulses and in low-gradient field distributions, whereas myelinated axons are mostly unaffected. SIGNIFICANCE The modified cable equation captures the membrane's behavior on different time scales and models more accurately the coupling between electric fields and neurons. It addresses the limitations of the conventional cable equation and allows sound theoretical interpretations. The implementation provides simple methods that are compatible with current simulation approaches to study the effect of transverse polarization on nonlinear membranes. The minimal influence by transverse polarization on axonal activation thresholds for the nonlinear membrane models indicates that predictions of stronger effects in linear membrane models with a fixed activation threshold are inaccurate. Thus, the conventional cable equation works well for most neuroengineering applications, and the presented modeling approach is well suited to address the exceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boshuo Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li LM, Violante IR, Leech R, Hampshire A, Opitz A, McArthur D, Carmichael DW, Sharp DJ. Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity. Neuroimage 2019; 185:425-433. [PMID: 30385222 PMCID: PMC6299257 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Salience Network (SN) and its interactions are important for cognitive control. We have previously shown that structural damage to the SN is associated with abnormal functional connectivity between the SN and Default Mode Network (DMN), abnormal DMN deactivation, and impaired response inhibition, which is an important aspect of cognitive control. This suggests that stimulating the SN might enhance cognitive control. Here, we tested whether non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) could be used to modulate activity within the SN and enhance cognitive control. TDCS was applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula cortex during performance of the Stop Signal Task (SST) and concurrent functional (f)MRI. Anodal TDCS improved response inhibition. Furthermore, stratification of participants based on SN structural connectivity showed that it was an important influence on both behavioural and physiological responses to anodal TDCS. Participants with high fractional anisotropy within the SN showed improved SST performance and increased activation of the SN with anodal TDCS, whilst those with low fractional anisotropy within the SN did not. Cathodal stimulation of the SN produced activation of the right caudate, an effect which was not modulated by SN structural connectivity. Our results show that stimulation targeted to the SN can improve response inhibition, supporting the causal influence of this network on cognitive control and confirming it as a target to produce cognitive enhancement. Our results also highlight the importance of structural connectivity as a modulator of network to TDCS, which should guide the design and interpretation of future stimulation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia M Li
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, W12 0NN, UK
| | | | - Rob Leech
- Centre for Neuroimaging Science, Denmark Hill, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Adam Hampshire
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Alexander Opitz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - David McArthur
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | | | - David J Sharp
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aberra AS, Peterchev AV, Grill WM. Biophysically realistic neuron models for simulation of cortical stimulation. J Neural Eng 2018; 15:066023. [PMID: 30127100 PMCID: PMC6239949 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aadbb1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We implemented computational models of human and rat cortical neurons for simulating the neural response to cortical stimulation with electromagnetic fields. APPROACH We adapted model neurons from the library of Blue Brain models to reflect biophysical and geometric properties of both adult rat and human cortical neurons and coupled the model neurons to exogenous electric fields (E-fields). The models included 3D reconstructed axonal and dendritic arbors, experimentally-validated electrophysiological behaviors, and multiple, morphological variants within cell types. Using these models, we characterized the single-cell responses to intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) and uniform E-field with dc as well as pulsed currents. MAIN RESULTS The strength-duration and current-distance characteristics of the model neurons to ICMS agreed with published experimental results, as did the subthreshold polarization of cell bodies and axon terminals by uniform dc E-fields. For all forms of stimulation, the lowest threshold elements were terminals of the axon collaterals, and the dependence of threshold and polarization on spatial and temporal stimulation parameters was strongly affected by morphological features of the axonal arbor, including myelination, diameter, and branching. SIGNIFICANCE These results provide key insights into the mechanisms of cortical stimulation. The presented models can be used to study various cortical stimulation modalities while incorporating detailed spatial and temporal features of the applied E-field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman S Aberra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li LM, Violante IR, Leech R, Ross E, Hampshire A, Opitz A, Rothwell JC, Carmichael DW, Sharp DJ. Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 40:904-915. [PMID: 30378206 PMCID: PMC6387619 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite its widespread use in cognitive studies, there is still limited understanding of whether and how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates brain network function. To clarify its physiological effects, we assessed brain network function using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) simultaneously acquired during tDCS stimulation. Cognitive state was manipulated by having subjects perform a Choice Reaction Task or being at “rest.” A novel factorial design was used to assess the effects of brain state and polarity. Anodal and cathodal tDCS were applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), a region involved in controlling activity large‐scale intrinsic connectivity networks during switches of cognitive state. tDCS produced widespread modulation of brain activity in a polarity and brain state dependent manner. In the absence of task, the main effect of tDCS was to accentuate default mode network (DMN) activation and salience network (SN) deactivation. In contrast, during task performance, tDCS increased SN activation. In the absence of task, the main effect of anodal tDCS was more pronounced, whereas cathodal tDCS had a greater effect during task performance. Cathodal tDCS also accentuated the within‐DMN connectivity associated with task performance. There were minimal main effects of stimulation on network connectivity. These results demonstrate that rIFG tDCS can modulate the activity and functional connectivity of large‐scale brain networks involved in cognitive function, in a brain state and polarity dependent manner. This study provides an important insight into mechanisms by which tDCS may modulate cognitive function, and also has implications for the design of future stimulation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia M Li
- Computational, Cognitive, and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Ines R Violante
- Computational, Cognitive, and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.,Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Rob Leech
- Centre for Neuroimaging Science, Kings College London, UK
| | - Ewan Ross
- Computational, Cognitive, and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Adam Hampshire
- Computational, Cognitive, and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Alexander Opitz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - John C Rothwell
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - David W Carmichael
- Centre for Neuroimaging Science, Kings College London, UK.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, UK
| | - David J Sharp
- Computational, Cognitive, and Clinical Imaging Lab, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mourdoukoutas AP, Truong DQ, Adair DK, Simon BJ, Bikson M. High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2018; 21:261-268. [PMID: 29076212 PMCID: PMC5895480 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop the first high-resolution, multi-scale model of cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) and to predict vagus fiber type activation, given clinically relevant rheobase thresholds. METHODS An MRI-derived Finite Element Method (FEM) model was developed to accurately simulate key macroscopic (e.g., skin, soft tissue, muscle) and mesoscopic (cervical enlargement, vertebral arch and foramen, cerebral spinal fluid [CSF], nerve sheath) tissue components to predict extracellular potential, electric field (E-Field), and activating function along the vagus nerve. Microscopic scale biophysical models of axons were developed to compare axons of varying size (Aα-, Aβ- and Aδ-, B-, and C-fibers). Rheobase threshold estimates were based on a step function waveform. RESULTS Macro-scale accuracy was found to determine E-Field magnitudes around the vagus nerve, while meso-scale precision determined E-field changes (activating function). Mesoscopic anatomical details that capture vagus nerve passage through a changing tissue environment (e.g., bone to soft tissue) profoundly enhanced predicted axon sensitivity while encapsulation in homogenous tissue (e.g., nerve sheath) dulled axon sensitivity to nVNS. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that realistic and precise modeling at both macroscopic and mesoscopic scales are needed for quantitative predictions of vagus nerve activation. Based on this approach, we predict conventional cervical nVNS protocols can activate A- and B- but not C-fibers. Our state-of-the-art implementation across scales is equally valuable for models of spinal cord stimulation, cortex/deep brain stimulation, and other peripheral/cranial nerve models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios P. Mourdoukoutas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - Dennis Q. Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - Devin K. Adair
- Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
| | | | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kuck A, Stegeman DF, van der Kooij H, van Asseldonk EHF. Changes in H-Reflex Recruitment After Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation With Multiple Electrode Configurations. Front Neurosci 2018; 12:151. [PMID: 29643759 PMCID: PMC5882846 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is an electro-modulatory tool with possible application in the rehabilitation of spinal cord injury. TsDCS generates a small electric field, aiming to induce lasting, functional neuromodulation in the targeted neuronal networks. Earlier studies have shown significant modulatory effects after application of lumbar tsDCS. However, for clinical application, a better understanding of application specific factors is required. Our goal was to investigate the effect of different electrode configurations using lumbar spinal tsDCS on spinal excitability. We applied tsDCS (2.5 mA, 15 min) in 10 healthy subjects with three different electrode configurations: (1) Anode and cathode placed over vertebra T11, and the posterior left shoulder respectively (LSC-S) (one polarity), and (2) Both electrodes placed in equal distance (ED) (7 cm) above and below vertebra T11, investigated for two polarities (ED-Anodal/Cathodal). The soleus H-Reflex is measured before, during and after tsDCS in either electrode configuration or a sham condition. To account for genetic predispositions in response to direct current stimulation, subject BDNF genotype was assessed. Stimulation in configuration ED-Cathodal induced an amplitude reduction of the H-reflex, 30 min after tsDCS with respect to baseline, whereas none of the other configurations led to significant post intervention effects. BDNF genotype did not correlate with post intervention effects. Furthermore, we failed to replicate effects shown by a previous study, which highlights the need for a better understanding of methodological and subject specific influences on tsDCS outcome. The H-reflex depression after tsDCS (Config. ED-Cathodal) provides new insights and may foster our understanding of the working mechanism of tsDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kuck
- Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Neuronal Rhythms in Movement Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna-son, Japan
| | - Dick F Stegeman
- Department of Neurology/Clinical Neurophysiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Herman van der Kooij
- Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Edwin H F van Asseldonk
- Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Woods AJ, Cohen R, Marsiske M, Alexander GE, Czaja SJ, Wu S. Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 65:19-32. [PMID: 29313802 PMCID: PMC5803439 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults over age 65 represent the fastest growing population in the US. Decline in cognitive abilities is a hallmark of advanced age and is associated with loss of independence and dementia risk. There is a pressing need to develop effective interventions for slowing or reversing the cognitive aging process. While certain forms of cognitive training have shown promise in this area, effects only sometimes transfer to neuropsychological tests within or outside the trained domain. This paper describes a NIA-funded Phase III adaptive multisite randomized clinical trial, examining whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortices enhances neurocognitive outcomes achieved from cognitive training in older adults experiencing age-related cognitive decline: the Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults study (ACT). METHODS ACT will enroll 360 participants aged 65 to 89 with age-related cognitive decline, but not dementia. Participants will undergo cognitive training intervention or education training-control combined with tDCS or sham tDCS control. Cognitive training employs a suite of eight adaptive training tasks focused on attention/speed of processing and working memory from Posit Science BrainHQ. Training control involves exposure to educational nature/history videos and related content questions of the same interval/duration as the cognitive training. Participants are assessed at baseline, after training (12weeks), and 12-month follow-up on our primary outcome measure, NIH Toolbox Fluid Cognition Composite Score, as well as a comprehensive neurocognitive, functional, clinical and multimodal neuroimaging battery. SIGNIFICANCE The findings from this study have the potential to significantly enhance efforts to ameliorate cognitive aging and slow dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, United States.
| | - Ronald Cohen
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, United States
| | - Michael Marsiske
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, United States
| | - Gene E Alexander
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Physiological Sciences Graduate Interdisciplinary Programs, BIO5 Institute, and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Sara J Czaja
- Center on Aging, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McKnight Brain Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, United States
| | - Samuel Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Toloza EHS, Negahbani E, Fröhlich F. I h interacts with somato-dendritic structure to determine frequency response to weak alternating electric field stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2017; 119:1029-1036. [PMID: 29187553 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00541.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) modulates brain dynamics using weak electric fields. Given the pathological changes in brain network oscillations in neurological and psychiatric illnesses, using alternating electric field waveforms that engage rhythmic activity has been proposed as a targeted, network-level treatment approach. Previous studies have investigated the effects of electric fields at the neuronal level. However, the biophysical basis of the cellular response to electric fields has remained limited. Here, we characterized the frequency-dependent response of different compartments in a layer V pyramidal neuron to exogenous electric fields to dissect the relative contributions of voltage-gated ion channels and neuronal morphology. Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in the distal dendrites was the primary ionic mechanism shaping the model's response to electric field stimulation and caused subthreshold resonance in the tuft at 20 ± 4 Hz. In contrast, subthreshold Ih-mediated resonance in response to local sinusoidal current injection was present in all model compartments at 11 ± 2 Hz. The frequencies of both resonance responses were modulated by Ih conductance density. We found that the difference in resonance frequency between the two stimulation types can be explained by the fact that exogenous electric fields simultaneously polarize the membrane potentials at the distal ends of the neuron (relative to field direction) in opposite directions. Our results highlight the role of Ih in shaping the cellular response to electric field stimulation and suggest that the common model of tCS as a weak somatic current injection fails to capture the cellular effects of electric field stimulation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Modulation of cortical oscillation by brain stimulation serves as a tool to understand the causal role of network oscillations in behavior and is a potential treatment modality that engages impaired network oscillations in disorders of the central nervous system. To develop targeted stimulation paradigms, cellular-level effects must be understood. We demonstrate that hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) and cell morphology cooperatively shape the response to applied alternating electric fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique H S Toloza
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ehsan Negahbani
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Flavio Fröhlich
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North, Carolina.,Carolina Center for Neurostimulation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kuck A, Stegeman DF, van Asseldonk EHF. Modeling trans-spinal direct current stimulation for the modulation of the lumbar spinal motor pathways. J Neural Eng 2017. [PMID: 28631619 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a potential new technique for the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). TsDCS aims to facilitate plastic changes in the neural pathways of the spinal cord with a positive effect on SCI recovery. To establish tsDCS as a possible treatment option for SCI, it is essential to gain a better understanding of its cause and effects. We seek to understand the acute effect of tsDCS, including the generated electric field (EF) and its polarization effect on the spinal circuits, to determine a cellular target. We further ask how these findings can be interpreted to explain published experimental results. APPROACH We use a realistic full body finite element volume conductor model to calculate the EF of a 2.5 mA direct current for three different electrode configurations. We apply the calculated electric field to realistic motoneuron models to investigate static changes in membrane resting potential. The results are combined with existing knowledge about the theoretical effect on a neuronal level and implemented into an existing lumbar spinal network model to simulate the resulting changes on a network level. MAIN RESULTS Across electrode configurations, the maximum EF inside the spinal cord ranged from 0.47 V m-1 to 0.82 V m-1. Axon terminal polarization was identified to be the dominant cellular target. Also, differences in electrode placement have a large influence on axon terminal polarization. Comparison between the simulated acute effects and the electrophysiological long-term changes observed in human tsDCS studies suggest an inverse relationship between the two. SIGNIFICANCE We provide methods and knowledge for better understanding the effects of tsDCS and serve as a basis for a more targeted and optimized application of tsDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuck
- University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu T, Fan J, Lee KS, Li X. Cortical neuron activation induced by electromagnetic stimulation: a quantitative analysis via modelling and simulation. J Comput Neurosci 2015; 40:51-64. [PMID: 26719168 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-015-0585-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Previous simulation works concerned with the mechanism of non-invasive neuromodulation has isolated many of the factors that can influence stimulation potency, but an inclusive account of the interplay between these factors on realistic neurons is still lacking. To give a comprehensive investigation on the stimulation-evoked neuronal activation, we developed a simulation scheme which incorporates highly detailed physiological and morphological properties of pyramidal cells. The model was implemented on a multitude of neurons; their thresholds and corresponding activation points with respect to various field directions and pulse waveforms were recorded. The results showed that the simulated thresholds had a minor anisotropy and reached minimum when the field direction was parallel to the dendritic-somatic axis; the layer 5 pyramidal cells always had lower thresholds but substantial variances were also observed within layers; reducing pulse length could magnify the threshold values as well as the variance; tortuosity and arborization of axonal segments could obstruct action potential initiation. The dependence of the initiation sites on both the orientation and the duration of the stimulus implies that the cellular excitability might represent the result of the competition between various firing-capable axonal components, each with a unique susceptibility determined by the local geometry. Moreover, the measurements obtained in simulation intimately resemble recordings in physiological and clinical studies, which seems to suggest that, with minimum simplification of the neuron model, the cable theory-based simulation approach can have sufficient verisimilitude to give quantitatively accurate evaluation of cell activities in response to the externally applied field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiecheng Wu
- Neuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore
| | - Jie Fan
- Neuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.,Newrocare Pte Ltd, 6 Eu Tong Sen Street, #12-03, SohoCentral Singapore, 059817, Singapore
| | - Kim Seng Lee
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiaoping Li
- Neuroengineering Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Block EA #04-25, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li LM, Uehara K, Hanakawa T. The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Front Cell Neurosci 2015; 9:181. [PMID: 26029052 PMCID: PMC4428123 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 282] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2015] [Accepted: 04/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been an explosion of research using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for investigating and modulating human cognitive and motor function in healthy populations. It has also been used in many studies seeking to improve deficits in disease populations. With the slew of studies reporting “promising results” for everything from motor recovery after stroke to boosting memory function, one could be easily seduced by the idea of tDCS being the next panacea for all neurological ills. However, huge variability exists in the reported effects of tDCS, with great variability in the effect sizes and even contradictory results reported. In this review, we consider the interindividual factors that may contribute to this variability. In particular, we discuss the importance of baseline neuronal state and features, anatomy, age and the inherent variability in the injured brain. We additionally consider how interindividual variability affects the results of motor-evoked potential (MEP) testing with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which, in turn, can lead to apparent variability in response to tDCS in motor studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia M Li
- Department of Advanced Neuroimaging, Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo, Japan ; Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Restorative Neurosciences, Imperial College London London, UK
| | - Kazumasa Uehara
- Department of Advanced Neuroimaging, Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo, Japan ; Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Tokyo Japan
| | - Takashi Hanakawa
- Department of Advanced Neuroimaging, Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nasseri P, Nitsche MA, Ekhtiari H. A framework for categorizing electrode montages in transcranial direct current stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9:54. [PMID: 25705188 PMCID: PMC4319395 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Padideh Nasseri
- Neurocognitive Laboratory, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran ; Translational Neuroscience Program, Iranian Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies (ICSS) Tehran, Iran
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Göttingen, Germany
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Neurocognitive Laboratory, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran ; Translational Neuroscience Program, Iranian Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies (ICSS) Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pelletier SJ, Cicchetti F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence from in vitro and in vivo models. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18:pyu047. [PMID: 25522391 PMCID: PMC4368894 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation is a noninvasive technique that has been experimentally tested for a number of psychiatric and neurological conditions. Preliminary observations suggest that this approach can indeed influence a number of cellular and molecular pathways that may be disease relevant. However, the mechanisms of action underlying its beneficial effects are largely unknown and need to be better understood to allow this therapy to be used optimally. In this review, we summarize the physiological responses observed in vitro and in vivo, with a particular emphasis on cellular and molecular cascades associated with inflammation, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and neuroplasticity recruited by direct current stimulation, a topic that has been largely neglected in the literature. A better understanding of the neural responses to transcranial direct current stimulation is critical if this therapy is to be used in large-scale clinical trials with a view of being routinely offered to patients suffering from various conditions affecting the central nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesca Cicchetti
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Axe Neuroscience, Québec, QC, Canada (Mr Pelletier and Dr Cicchetti); Département de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada (Mr Pelletier and Dr Cicchetti).
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bikson M, Name A, Rahman A. Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:688. [PMID: 24155708 PMCID: PMC3800813 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2013] [Accepted: 09/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is investigated for a broad range of neuropsychiatric indications, various rehabilitation applications, and to modulate cognitive performance in diverse tasks. Specificity of tDCS refers broadly to the ability of tDCS to produce precise, as opposed to diffuse, changes in brain function. Practically, specificity of tDCS implies application-specific customization of protocols to maximize desired outcomes and minimize undesired effects. Especially given the simplicity of tDCS and the complexity of brain function, understanding the mechanisms leading to specificity is fundamental to the rational advancement of tDCS. We define the origins of specificity based on anatomical and functional factors. Anatomical specificity derives from guiding current to targeted brain structures. Functional specificity may derive from either activity-selectivity, where active neuronal networks are preferentially modulated by tDCS, or input-selectivity, where bias is applied to different synaptic inputs. Rational advancement of tDCS may require leveraging all forms of specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rahman A, Reato D, Arlotti M, Gasca F, Datta A, Parra LC, Bikson M. Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol 2013; 591:2563-78. [PMID: 23478132 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 364] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate cortical excitability. Although increased/decreased excitability under the anode/cathode electrode is nominally associated with membrane depolarization/hyperpolarization, which cellular compartments (somas, dendrites, axons and their terminals) mediate changes in cortical excitability remains unaddressed. Here we consider the acute effects of DCS on excitatory synaptic efficacy. Using multi-scale computational models and rat cortical brain slices, we show the following. (1) Typical tDCS montages produce predominantly tangential (relative to the cortical surface) direction currents (4-12 times radial direction currents), even directly under electrodes. (2) Radial current flow (parallel to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy consistent with somatic polarization, with depolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (3) Tangential current flow (perpendicular to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy acutely (during stimulation) in an afferent pathway-specific manner that is consistent with terminal polarization, with hyperpolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (4) Maximal polarization during uniform DCS is expected at distal (the branch length is more than three times the membrane length constant) synaptic terminals, independent of and two-three times more susceptible than pyramidal neuron somas. We conclude that during acute DCS the cellular targets responsible for modulation of synaptic efficacy are concurrently somata and axon terminals, with the direction of cortical current flow determining the relative influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asif Rahman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, Convent Avenue at 140th Street, Steinman Hall, 4th Floor, T-454, New York, NY 10031, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|