Noninvasive estimation of alveolar pressure

Tracking respiratory mechanics around natural breathing rates via variable ventilation

Measuring respiratory resistance and elastance as a function of time, tidal volume, respiratory rate, and positive end-expiratory pressure can guide mechanical ventilation. However, current measurement techniques are limited since they are assessed intermittently at non-physiological frequencies or involve specialized equipment. To this end, we introduce ZVV, a practical approach to continuously track resistance and elastance during Variable Ventilation (VV), in which frequency and tidal volume vary from breath-to-breath. ZVV segments airway pressure and flow recordings into individual breaths, calculates resistance and elastance for each breath, bins them according to frequency or tidal volume and plots the results against bin means. ZVV's feasibility was assessed clinically in five human patients with acute lung injury, experimentally in five mice ventilated before and after lavage injury, and computationally using a viscoelastic respiratory model. ZVV provided continuous measurements in both settings, while the computational study revealed <2% estimation errors. Our findings support ZVV as a feasible technique to assess respiratory mechanics under physiological conditions. Additionally, in humans, ZVV detected a decrease in resistance and elastance with time by 12.8% and 6.2%, respectively, suggesting that VV can improve lung recruitment in some patients and can therefore potentially serve both as a dual diagnostic and therapeutic tool.

Automatic Estimation of Respiratory Effort using Esophageal Pressure

Esophageal pressure is currently seen as the gold standard to quantify the respiratory effort during assisted spontaneous ventilation. Yet, the assessment of waveforms at the bedside is often complicated due to heavy interference by cardiac artifacts and due to the unknown dependency on the lung volume. We propose an algorithm that automatically removes artifacts and gives an estimate for the respiratory effort of a patient. The estimator is based on fitting a respiratory system model to the Campbell diagram and, thus, also gives insight into important patient parameters like the chest wall elastance. The feasibility of our approach is demonstrated using clinical datasets of patients on pressure support ventilation. The algorithm facilitates the interpretation of ventilatory waveforms and may support the overall assessment of patients.

Two-parameter leak estimation in non-invasive ventilation

In this paper we present a method for the estimation of leaks in non-invasive ventilation. Accurate estimation of leaks is a key component of a ventilator, since it determines the ventilator performance in terms of patient-ventilator synchrony and air volume delivery. In particular, in non-invasive ventilation, the patient flow is significantly different from the flow measured at the ventilator outlet. This is mostly due to the vent orifice along the tube that is used for exhalation, but also to the non-intentional leaks that occur elsewhere in the circuit (e.g., at the mask). Such leaks are traditionally quantified via a model with two parameters, but only one of them is continually updated - the other is fixed. The new algorithm allows for breath-by-breath update of both parameters. This was made possible by leveraging a model describing the patient respiratory mechanics.

End-inspiratory occlusion in the presence of intrinsic PEEP

Typical modern mechanical ventilators offer the clinician the possibility of automatically performing end-inspiratory occlusion maneuvers. The static conditions induced by such maneuvers are indeed favorable to estimating patient's respiratory mechanics in terms of total resistance (R) and elastance (E). These are parameters of wide clinical interest. However, in the presence of intrinsic PEEP, the standard formula used to compute E via the occlusion maneuver is known to be inaccurate. In this paper we propose an alternative method for the estimation of E via the occlusion maneuver that eliminates the bias by leveraging concepts derived from physiological modeling of the respiratory system dynamics. The proposed method is also capable of accounting for respiratory efforts triggering the breath, and hence can be applied in both passive and spontaneously breathing conditions.