Evaluation of Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Retina with Optical Coherence Tomography

Development of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography imaging platform and metrics to quantify electrostimulation-induced peripheral nerve injury in vivo in a small animal model

Significance

Neuromodulation devices are rapidly evolving for the treatment of neurological diseases and conditions. Injury from implantation or long-term use without obvious functional losses is often only detectable through terminal histology. New technologies are needed that assess the peripheral nervous system (PNS) under normal and diseased or injured conditions.

Aim

We aim to demonstrate an imaging and stimulation platform that can elucidate the biological mechanisms and impacts of neurostimulation in the PNS and apply it to the sciatic nerve to extract imaging metrics indicating electrical overstimulation.

Approach

A sciatic nerve injury model in a 15-rat cohort was observed using a newly developed imaging and stimulation platform that can detect electrical overstimulation effects with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. The sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated using a custom-developed nerve holder with embedded electrodes for 1 h, followed by a 1-h recovery period, delivered at above-threshold Shannon model k -values in experimental groups: sham control (SC, n = 5 , 0.0    mA / 0    Hz ), stimulation level 1 (SL1, n = 5 , 3.4    mA / 50    Hz , and k = 2.57 ), and stimulation level 2 (SL2, n = 5 , 6.8    mA / 100    Hz , and k = 3.17 ).

Results

The stimulation and imaging system successfully captured study data across the cohort. When compared to a SC after a 1-week recovery, the fascicle closest to the stimulation lead showed an average change of + 4 % / - 309 % (SL1/SL2) in phase retardation and - 79 % / - 148 % in optical attenuation relative to SC. Analysis of immunohistochemistry (IHC) shows a + 1 % / - 36 % difference in myelin pixel counts and - 13 % / + 29 % difference in axon pixel counts, and an overall increase in cell nuclei pixel count of + 20 % / + 35 % . These metrics were consistent with IHC and hematoxylin/eosin tissue section analysis.

Conclusions

The poststimulation changes observed in our study are manifestations of nerve injury and repair, specifically degeneration and angiogenesis. Optical imaging metrics quantify these processes and may help evaluate the safety and efficacy of neuromodulation devices.

Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety

Current standards for safe delivery of electrical stimulation to the central nervous system are based on foundational studies which examined post-mortem tissue for histological signs of damage. This set of observations and the subsequently proposed limits to safe stimulation, termed the "Shannon limits," allow for a simple calculation (using charge per phase and charge density) to determine the intensity of electrical stimulation that can be delivered safely to brain tissue. In the three decades since the Shannon limits were reported, advances in molecular biology have allowed for more nuanced and detailed approaches to be used to expand current understanding of the physiological effects of stimulation. Here, we demonstrate the use of spatial transcriptomics (ST) in an exploratory investigation to assess the biological response to electrical stimulation in the brain. Electrical stimulation was delivered to the rat visual cortex with either acute or chronic electrode implantation procedures. To explore the influence of device type and stimulation parameters, we used carbon fiber ultramicroelectrode arrays (7 μm diameter) and microwire electrode arrays (50 μm diameter) delivering charge and charge density levels selected above and below reported tissue damage thresholds (range: 2-20 nC, 0.1-1 mC/cm2). Spatial transcriptomics was performed using Visium Spatial Gene Expression Slides (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, United States), which enabled simultaneous immunohistochemistry and ST to directly compare traditional histological metrics to transcriptional profiles within each tissue sample. Our data give a first look at unique spatial patterns of gene expression that are related to cellular processes including inflammation, cell cycle progression, and neuronal plasticity. At the acute timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and plasticity related genes was observed surrounding a stimulating electrode compared to a craniotomy control. At the chronic timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and cell cycle progression related genes was observed both in the stimulating vs. non-stimulating microwire electrode comparison and in the stimulating microwire vs. carbon fiber comparison. Using the spatial aspect of this method as well as the within-sample link to traditional metrics of tissue damage, we demonstrate how these data may be analyzed and used to generate new hypotheses and inform safety standards for stimulation in cortex.

Electrode Materials for Chronic Electrical Microstimulation

Electrical microstimulation has enabled partial restoration of vision, hearing, movement, somatosensation, as well as improving organ functions by electrically modulating neural activities. However, chronic microstimulation is faced with numerous challenges. The implantation of an electrode array into the neural tissue triggers an inflammatory response, which can be exacerbated by the delivery of electrical currents. Meanwhile, prolonged stimulation may lead to electrode material degradation., which can be accelerated by the hostile inflammatory environment. Both material degradation and adverse tissue reactions can compromise stimulation performance over time. For stable chronic electrical stimulation, an ideal microelectrode must present 1) high charge injection limit, to efficiently deliver charge without exceeding safety limits for both tissue and electrodes, 2) small size, to gain high spatial selectivity, 3) excellent biocompatibility that ensures tissue health immediately next to the device, and 4) stable in vivo electrochemical properties over the application period. In this review, the challenges in chronic microstimulation are described in detail. To aid material scientists interested in neural stimulation research, the in vitro and in vivo testing methods are introduced for assessing stimulation functionality and longevity and a detailed overview of recent advances in electrode material research and device fabrication for improving chronic microstimulation performance is provided.

Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation: An International Study

PURPOSE

To assess the retinal anatomy and array position in Argus II retinal prosthesis recipients.

DESIGN

Prospective, noncomparative cohort study.

METHODS

Setting: International multicenter study.

PATIENTS

Argus II recipients enrolled in the Post-Market Surveillance Studies.

PROCEDURES

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images collected for the Surveillance Studies (NCT01860092 and NCT01490827) were reviewed. Baseline and postoperative macular thickness, electrode-retina distance (gap), optic disc-array overlap, and preretinal membrane presence were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Axial retinal thickness and axial gap along the array's long axis (a line between the tack and handle); maximal retinal thickness and maximal gap along a B-scan near the tack, midline, and handle.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients from 16 surgical sites in the United States and Germany were included. Mean axial retinal thickness increased from month 1 through month 12 at each location, but reached statistical significance only at the array midline (P = .007). The rate of maximal thickness increase was highest near the array midline (slope = 6.02, P = .004), compared to the tack (slope = 3.60, P < .001) or the handle (slope = 1.93, P = .368). The mean axial and maximal gaps decreased over the study period, and the mean maximal gap size decrease was significant at midline (P = .032). Optic disc-array overlap was seen in the minority of patients. Preretinal membranes were common before and after implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive macular thickening under the array was common and corresponded to decreased electrode-retina gap over time. By month 12, the array was completely apposed to the macula in approximately half of the eyes.