1
|
Bernabei JM, Li A, Revell AY, Smith RJ, Gunnarsdottir KM, Ong IZ, Davis KA, Sinha N, Sarma S, Litt B. Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG. Brain 2023; 146:2248-2258. [PMID: 36623936 PMCID: PMC10232272 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Andrew Y Revell
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Neuroengineering Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Kristin M Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Ian Z Ong
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gunnarsdottir KM, Li A, Smith RJ, Kang JY, Korzeniewska A, Crone NE, Rouse AG, Cheng JJ, Kinsman MJ, Landazuri P, Uysal U, Ulloa CM, Cameron N, Cajigas I, Jagid J, Kanner A, Elarjani T, Bicchi MM, Inati S, Zaghloul KA, Boerwinkle VL, Wyckoff S, Barot N, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Sarma SV. Source-sink connectivity: a novel interictal EEG marker for seizure localization. Brain 2022; 145:3901-3915. [PMID: 36412516 PMCID: PMC10200292 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 15 million epilepsy patients worldwide have drug-resistant epilepsy. Successful surgery is a standard of care treatment but can only be achieved through complete resection or disconnection of the epileptogenic zone, the brain region(s) where seizures originate. Surgical success rates vary between 20% and 80%, because no clinically validated biological markers of the epileptogenic zone exist. Localizing the epileptogenic zone is a costly and time-consuming process, which often requires days to weeks of intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. Clinicians visually inspect iEEG data to identify abnormal activity on individual channels occurring immediately before seizures or spikes that occur interictally (i.e. between seizures). In the end, the clinical standard mainly relies on a small proportion of the iEEG data captured to assist in epileptogenic zone localization (minutes of seizure data versus days of recordings), missing opportunities to leverage these largely ignored interictal data to better diagnose and treat patients. IEEG offers a unique opportunity to observe epileptic cortical network dynamics but waiting for seizures increases patient risks associated with invasive monitoring. In this study, we aimed to leverage interictal iEEG data by developing a new network-based interictal iEEG marker of the epileptogenic zone. We hypothesized that when a patient is not clinically seizing, it is because the epileptogenic zone is inhibited by other regions. We developed an algorithm that identifies two groups of nodes from the interictal iEEG network: those that are continuously inhibiting a set of neighbouring nodes ('sources') and the inhibited nodes themselves ('sinks'). Specifically, patient-specific dynamical network models were estimated from minutes of iEEG and their connectivity properties revealed top sources and sinks in the network, with each node being quantified by source-sink metrics. We validated the algorithm in a retrospective analysis of 65 patients. The source-sink metrics identified epileptogenic regions with 73% accuracy and clinicians agreed with the algorithm in 93% of seizure-free patients. The algorithm was further validated by using the metrics of the annotated epileptogenic zone to predict surgical outcomes. The source-sink metrics predicted outcomes with an accuracy of 79% compared to an accuracy of 43% for clinicians' predictions (surgical success rate of this dataset). In failed outcomes, we identified brain regions with high metrics that were untreated. When compared with high frequency oscillations, the most commonly proposed interictal iEEG feature for epileptogenic zone localization, source-sink metrics outperformed in predictive power (by a factor of 1.2), suggesting they may be an interictal iEEG fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Joon-Yi Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Anna Korzeniewska
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Adam G Rouse
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Jennifer J Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Michael J Kinsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Patrick Landazuri
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Utku Uysal
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Carol M Ulloa
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Nathaniel Cameron
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Jonathan Jagid
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Andres Kanner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Turki Elarjani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Manuel Melo Bicchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sara Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Kareem A Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Varina L Boerwinkle
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
| | - Sarah Wyckoff
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
| | - Niravkumar Barot
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gunnarsdottir KM, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Wing S, Sarma SV. Sources and Sinks in Interictal iEEG Networks: An iEEG Marker of the Epileptogenic Zone. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2021; 2021:6558-6561. [PMID: 34892611 DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Around 30% of epilepsy patients have seizures that cannot be controlled with medication. The most effective treatments for medically resistant epilepsy are interventions that surgically remove the epileptogenic zone (EZ), the regions of the brain that initiate seizure activity. A precise identification of the EZ is essential for surgical success but unfortunately, current success rates range from 20-80%. Localization of the EZ requires visual inspection of intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings during seizure events. The need for seizure occurrence makes the process both costly and time-consuming and in the end, less than 1% of the data captured is used to assist in EZ localization. In this study, we aim to leverage interictal (between seizures) data to localize the EZ. We develop and test the source-sink index as an interictal iEEG marker by identifying two groups of network nodes from a patient's interictal iEEG network: those that inhibit a set of their neighboring nodes ("sources") and the inhibited nodes themselves ("sinks"). Specifically, we i) estimate patient-specific dynamical network models from interictal iEEG data and ii) compute a source-sink index for every network node (iEEG channel) to identify pathological nodes that correspond to the EZ. Our results suggest that in patients with successful surgical outcomes, the source-sink index clearly separates the clinically identified EZ (CA-EZ) channels from other channels whereas in patients with failed outcomes CA-EZ channels cannot be distinguished from the rest of the network.
Collapse
|
4
|
Li A, Huynh C, Fitzgerald Z, Cajigas I, Brusko D, Jagid J, Claudio AO, Kanner AM, Hopp J, Chen S, Haagensen J, Johnson E, Anderson W, Crone N, Inati S, Zaghloul KA, Bulacio J, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Sarma SV. Neural fragility as an EEG marker of the seizure onset zone. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:1465-1474. [PMID: 34354282 PMCID: PMC8547387 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-021-00901-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over 15 million patients with epilepsy worldwide do not respond to drugs. Successful surgical treatment requires complete removal or disconnection of the seizure onset zone (SOZ), brain region(s) where seizures originate. Unfortunately, surgical success rates vary between 30 and 70% because no clinically validated biological marker of the SOZ exists. We develop and retrospectively validate a new electroencephalogram (EEG) marker-neural fragility-in a retrospective analysis of 91 patients by using neural fragility of the annotated SOZ as a metric to predict surgical outcomes. Fragility predicts 43 out of 47 surgical failures, with an overall prediction accuracy of 76% compared with the accuracy of clinicians at 48% (successful outcomes). In failed outcomes, we identify fragile regions that were untreated. When compared to 20 EEG features proposed as SOZ markers, fragility outperformed in predictive power and interpretability, which suggests neural fragility as an EEG biomarker of the SOZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Chester Huynh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Damian Brusko
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan Jagid
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Angel O Claudio
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Andres M Kanner
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer Hopp
- Neurology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Chen
- Neurology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Emily Johnson
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Nathan Crone
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kareem A Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Juan Bulacio
- Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
- Neurosurgery and Epilepsy Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ehrens D, Li A, Aeed F, Schiller Y, Sarma SV. Network Fragility for Seizure Genesis in an Acute in vivo Model of Epilepsy. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2020:3695-3698. [PMID: 33018803 DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy affects over 50 million people worldwide and 30% of patients' seizures are medically refractory. The process of localizing and removing the epileptogenic zone is error-prone and ill-posed in part because we do not understand how epilepsy manifests. It has recently been proposed that the epileptic cortex is fragile in the sense that seizures manifest through small perturbations in the synaptic connections that render the entire cortical network unstable. If the fragility of the cortical network could be computed over a period in which seizure genesis occurs, then it might elucidate network mechanisms correlated to the epileptogenic zone. In this study, we used local field potentials (LFP) from neocortex by implementing an acute model of epilepsy in mice. These recordings were used to develop a dynamical network model that quantifies the fragility of the nodes from LFP epochs of baseline activity, preictal and ictal states. Fragility was quantified by the generation of a linear time-varying model to which we then applied a perturbation to determine the sensitivity of nodes in the network. Spatiotemporal fragility maps showed clear quantifiable changes in the epileptogenic network's properties throughout different states of seizure genesis. We quantified this difference over a baseline, preictal and ictal periods to show that network fragility is modulated in the manifestation of epilepsy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith RJ, Kamali G, Hays M, Coogan CG, Crone NE, Sarma SV, Kang JY. State-space models of evoked potentials to localize the seizure onset zone. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2020:2528-2531. [PMID: 33018521 DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Surgical removal of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in epilepsy patients is a potentially curative treatment, but the process heavily relies on accurate localization of the SOZ via visual inspection. SPES (Single-pulse electrical stimulation) is a method recently used to explore inter-areal connectivity in vivo to probe functional brain networks such as language and motor networks, and to a much lesser degree, seizure networks. We hypothesized that a dynamical quantification of the connectivity networks derived from the evoked responses induced by SPES could also be used to localize the SOZ. To test our hypothesis, we used an intracranial EEG (iEEG) data set in which five epilepsy patients underwent extensive SPES evaluation. For each patient, and for each dataset that stimulated a different pair of electrodes, we constructed a state-space model from the patient's data. Specifically, we simultaneously estimated model parameters under an exogenous pulse input to a dynamical system whose state vector consisted of the response iEEG signals. Then, the size of the reachable state space, as quantified by the maximum singular value of the reachability matrix, σmax(R), was computed and denoted as the "largest" network response possible when stimulating the given pair. Our results suggest high agreement between σmax(R) and clinically annotated SOZ for patients with localizable SOZs.Clinical Relevance- Our study applies dynamical systems theory to identify epileptogenic brain regions, creating a novel tool that clinicians may use in surgical planning for medically-refractory epilepsy patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gunnarsdottir KM, Bulacio J, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Sarma SV. Estimating Intracranial EEG Signals at Missing Electrodes in Epileptic Networks. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2019:3858-3861. [PMID: 31946715 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy can be controlled by targeted treatment of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), the region in the brain where seizures originate. Identification of the EZ often requires visual inspection of invasive EEG recordings and thus relies heavily on placement of electrodes, such that they cover the EZ. A dense brain coverage would be ideal to obtain accurate boundaries of the EZ but is not possible due to surgical limitations. This gives rise to the "missing electrode problem", where clinicians desire to know what neural activity looks like between implanted electrodes. In this paper, we compare two methods for time series estimation of missing stereotactic EEG (SEEG) recordings. Specifically, we represent SEEG data as a sequence of Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) models. We then remove one signal from the data set and apply two different algorithms to simultaneously estimate the LTI models and the "missing" signal: (i) a Reduced-Order Observer in combination with Least Squares Estimation and (ii) an Expectation Maximization based Kalman Filter. The performance of each approach is evaluated in terms of (i) estimation error, (ii) sensitivity to initial conditions, and (iii) algorithm run-time. We found that the EM approach has smaller estimation errors and is less sensitive to initial conditions. However, the reduced-order observer has a run-time that is orders of magnitude faster.
Collapse
|
8
|
Li A, Sarma SV, Fitzgerald Z, Hopp J, Johnson E, Crone N, Bulacio J, Martinez-Gonzalez J, Inati S, Zaghloul K. Virtual Cortical Stimulation Mapping of Epilepsy Networks to Localize the Epileptogenic Zone. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2019:2328-2331. [PMID: 31946366 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Cortical stimulation mapping (CSM) is a common clinical procedure for mapping eloquent cortex in epilepsy patients. Electrical responses to the stimulation, or after-discharges (ADs), that occur in response to stimulation can point to unstable regions of cortex that are more prone to spontaneous seizures. Clinicians are interested in identifying regions that start seizures, i.e., the epileptogenic zone (EZ), so that they can target treatment. However, during CSM, not all regions are stimulated, as it would be time-consuming and potentially harmful to the patient. This limits the clinician's ability to fully explore ADs to reliably localize the EZ. In this paper, we develop a virtual CSM procedure that processes pre-seizure intracranial EEG recordings obtained from epilepsy patients being treated at three different epilepsy centers. First, we identify a linear time varying network (LTVN) model from electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereo-EEG (SEEG) data using sparse least squares estimation for each patient. We then construct an virtual CSM by applying impulse perturbations to each electrode contact in the LTVN model and then measuring the ADs of the network. We summarize the l2-norm of the responses in the form of a heatmap that shows the spatio-temporal evolution of the ADs before, during, and after seizures. Finally we compute an impulse response ratio (IRR) metric from each heatmap, that measures the ratio between the mean norm of ADs of clinically annotated EZ contacts and the mean norm of ADs of the remaining contacts. We find that the IRR is higher in maps derived from patients with successful surgical outcomes and lower in failed surgical outcomes. This suggests that virtual CSM may provide valuable information to clinicians regarding EZ location.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stacey W, Kramer M, Gunnarsdottir K, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Zaghloul K, Inati S, Sarma S, Stiso J, Khambhati AN, Bassett DS, Smith RJ, Liu VB, Lopour BA, Staba R. Emerging roles of network analysis for epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2020; 159:106255. [PMID: 31855828 PMCID: PMC6990460 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In recent years there has been increasing interest in applying network science tools to EEG data. At the 2018 American Epilepsy Society conference in New Orleans, LA, the yearly session of the Engineering and Neurostimulation Special Interest Group focused on emerging, translational technologies to analyze seizure networks. Each speaker demonstrated practical examples of how network tools can be utilized in clinical care and provide additional data to help care for patients with intractable epilepsy. The groups presented advances using tools from functional connectivity, control theory, and graph theory to analyze human EEG data. These tools have great potential to augment clinical interpretation of EEG signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Stacey
- Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, United States.
| | - Mark Kramer
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Center of Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, United States
| | | | | | - Kareem Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, United States
| | - Sara Inati
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, United States
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Neurology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, United States
| | - Jennifer Stiso
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | | | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - Virginia B Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine, United States; Department of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, CA, United States
| | - Beth A Lopour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - Richard Staba
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|