Single-stride exposure to pulse torque assistance provided by a robotic exoskeleton at the hip and knee joints

State-Based Versus Time-Based Estimation of the Gait Phase for Hip Exoskeletons in Steady and Transient Walking

The growing demand for online gait phase (GP) estimation, driven by advancements in exoskeletons and prostheses, has prompted numerous approaches in the literature. Some approaches explicitly use time, while others rely on state variables to estimate the GP. In this article, we study two novel GP estimation methods: a State-based Method (SM) which employs the phase portrait of the hip angle (similar to previous methods), but uses a stretching transformation to reduce the nonlinearity of the estimated GP; and a Time-based Method (TM) that utilizes feature recognition on the hip angle signal to update the estimated cadence twice per gait cycle. The methods were tested across various speeds and slopes, encompassing steady and transient walking conditions. The results demonstrated the ability of both methods to estimate the GP in a range of conditions. The TM outperformed the SM, exhibiting a root-mean-squared error below 3% compared to 8.5% for the SM. However, the TM exhibited diminished performance during speed transitions, whereas the SM performed consistently in steady and transient conditions. The SM displayed a better performance in inclined walking and demonstrated higher linearity at faster speeds. Through the assessment of these methods in diverse conditions, this study lays the groundwork for further advancements in GP estimation methods and their application in assistive controllers.

Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait

Background

Many lower-limb exoskeletons have been developed to assist gait, exhibiting a large range of control methods. The goal of this paper is to review and classify these control strategies, that determine how these devices interact with the user.

Methods

In addition to covering the recent publications on the control of lower-limb exoskeletons for gait assistance, an effort has been made to review the controllers independently of the hardware and implementation aspects. The common 3-level structure (high, middle, and low levels) is first used to separate the continuous behavior (mid-level) from the implementation of position/torque control (low-level) and the detection of the terrain or user’s intention (high-level). Within these levels, different approaches (functional units) have been identified and combined to describe each considered controller.

Results

291 references have been considered and sorted by the proposed classification. The methods identified in the high-level are manual user input, brain interfaces, or automatic mode detection based on the terrain or user’s movements. In the mid-level, the synchronization is most often based on manual triggers by the user, discrete events (followed by state machines or time-based progression), or continuous estimations using state variables. The desired action is determined based on position/torque profiles, model-based calculations, or other custom functions of the sensory signals. In the low-level, position or torque controllers are used to carry out the desired actions. In addition to a more detailed description of these methods, the variants of implementation within each one are also compared and discussed in the paper.

Conclusions

By listing and comparing the features of the reviewed controllers, this work can help in understanding the numerous techniques found in the literature. The main identified trends are the use of pre-defined trajectories for full-mobilization and event-triggered (or adaptive-frequency-oscillator-synchronized) torque profiles for partial assistance. More recently, advanced methods to adapt the position/torque profiles online and automatically detect terrains or locomotion modes have become more common, but these are largely still limited to laboratory settings. An analysis of the possible underlying reasons of the identified trends is also carried out and opportunities for further studies are discussed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3.

Robot-Aided Training of Propulsion During Walking: Effects of Torque Pulses Applied to the Hip and Knee Joints During Stance

We sought to evaluate the effects of the application of torque pulses to the hip and knee joint via a robotic exoskeleton in the context of training propulsion during walking. Based on our previous study, we formulated a set of conditions of torque pulses applied to the hip and knee joint associated with changes in push-off posture, a component of propulsion. In this work, we quantified the effects of hip/knee torque pulses on metrics of propulsion, specifically hip extension (HE) and normalized propulsive impulse (NPI), in two experiments. In the first experiment, we exposed 16 participants to sixteen conditions of torque pulses during single strides to observe the immediate effects of pulse application. In the second experiment, we exposed 16 participants to a subset of those conditions for 200 strides to quantify short-term adaptation effects. During pulse application, NPI aligned with the expected modulation of push-off posture, while HE was modulated in the opposite direction. The timing of the applied pulses, early or late stance, was crucial, as the effects were often in the opposite direction when changing timing condition. Extension torque applied at late stance increased HE in both experiments - range of change in HE: (2.9 ± 0.4 deg, 7.7 ± 1.0 deg), . The same conditions resulted in a negative change in NPI only in the single pulse experiment - change in NPI for knee torque: -3.0 ± 0.4 ms, - and no significant change for hip torque. Also, knee extension and flexion torque during early and late stance, respectively, increased NPI during single pulse application - range of change in NPI: (3.8, 4.6) ± 0.8 ms, . During repeated pulse application, NPI increased for late stance flexion torque - range of change in NPI: (4.5 ± 0.7 ms, 4.8 ± 0.8 ms), , but not late stance extension torque. After exposure, we observed positive after-effects in HE in three conditions - range of change in HE: (2.0 ± 0.3 deg, 3.7 ± 0.7 deg) - and significant positive after-effects in NPI for early stance flexion torques - change in NPI: (2.7 ± 0.6 ms, ). These results indicate that positive propulsive after-effects can be achieved through repeated exposure to torque pulses.