Conception and design of an automated insertion tool for cochlear implants

Development of Automated Tool for Electrode Array Insertion and its Study on Intracochlear Pressure

Cochlear implantation is the most successful approach for people with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Manual insertion of the electrode array may result in damaging the soft tissue structures and basilar membrane. An automated electrode array insertion device is reported to be less traumatic in cochlear implant surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The present work develops a simple, reliable, and compact device for automatically inserting the electrode array during cochlear implantation and test the device to observe intracochlear pressure during simulated electrode insertion.

METHODS

The device actuates the electrode array by a roller mechanism. For testing the automated device, a straight cochlea having the dimension of the scala tympani and a model electrode is developed using a 3D printer. A pressure sensor is utilized to observe the pressure change at different insertional conditions.

RESULTS

The electrode is inserted into a prototype cochlea at different speeds without any pause, and it is noticed that the pressure is increased with the depth of insertion of the electrode irrespective of the speed of electrode insertion. The rate of pressure change is observed to be increased exponentially with the speed of insertion.

CONCLUSION

At an insertion speed of 0.15 mm/s, the peak pressure is observed to be 133 Pa, which can be further evaluated in anatomical models for clinical scenarios.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1388-1395, 2024.

Concept and first Implementation of an intracochlearly navigated Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear implants (CI) are an established treatment for people with deafness or severe hearing loss. To restore patients' hearing an electrode array (EA) of the CI is inserted into the cochlea to stimulate the auditory nerve. Thereby, the exact positioning and gentle insertion of the EA is crucial for optimal hearing perception outcome. Currently, only microscopic vision is available for entering the cochlea, but the critical intracochlear process during EA insertion is like a "black box" and the surgeon has to rely on haptic feedback. Methods for visualizing the insertion process during surgery are inaccurate or not suitable for routine use due to radiation exposure. To address this problem, we developed a computer-assisted and image-guided cochlear implantation system with an exact real-time visualization of the EA position during the insertion process. The system is based on an electromagnetic tracking system that measures the position and orientation of a sensor integrated into the tip of a EA prototype and visualizes it in presurgical image data. A first experiment with our system showed that a EA prototype could be inserted into a cochlea of a human temporal bone and placed with an accuracy of [Formula: see text]. A maximum insertion angle of 120° was achieved.

Robot-Assisted Electrode Array Insertion Becomes Available in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: First Report and an Intra-Individual Study

Background: As an advanced surgical technique to reduce trauma to the inner ear, robot-assisted electrode array (EA) insertion has been applied in adult cochlear implantation (CI) and was approved as a safe surgical procedure that could result in better outcomes. As the mastoid and temporal bones are generally smaller in children, which would increase the difficulty for robot-assisted manipulation, the clinical application of these systems for CI in children has not been reported. Given that the pediatric candidate is the main population, we aim to investigate the safety and reliability of robot-assisted techniques in pediatric cochlear implantation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study at a referral center in Shanghai including all patients of simultaneous bilateral CI with robotic assistance on one side (RobOtol® system, Collin ORL, Bagneux, France), and manual insertion on the other (same brand of EA and CI in both side), from December 2019 to June 2020. The surgical outcomes, radiological measurements (EA positioning, EA insertion depth, mastoidectomy size), and audiological outcomes (Behavior pure-tone audiometry) were evaluated.

Results: Five infants (17.8 ± 13.5 months, ranging from 10 to 42 months) and an adult (39 years old) were enrolled in this study. Both perimodiolar and lateral wall EAs were included. The robot-assisted EA insertion was successfully performed in all cases, although the surgical zone in infants was about half the size in adults, and no difference was observed in mastoidectomy size between robot-assisted and manual insertion sides (p = 0.219). The insertion depths of EA with two techniques were similar (P = 0.583). The robot-assisted technique showed no scalar deviation, but scalar deviation occurred for one manually inserted pre-curved EA (16%). Early auditory performance was similar to both techniques.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted technique for EA insertion is approved to be used safely and reliably in children, which is possible and potential for better scalar positioning and might improve long-term auditory outcome. Standard mastoidectomy size was enough for robot-assisted technique. This first study marks the arrival of the era of robotic CI for all ages.

Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma

HYPOTHESIS

Use of micro-mechanical control during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion will result in reduced number and magnitude of pressure transients when compared with standard insertion by hand.

INTRODUCTION

With increasing focus on hearing preservation during CI surgery, atraumatic electrode insertion is of the utmost importance. It has been established that large intracochlear pressure spikes can be generated during the insertion of implant electrodes. Here, we examine the effect of using a micro-mechanical insertion control tool on pressure trauma exposures during implantation.

METHODS

Human cadaveric heads were surgically prepared with an extended facial recess. Electrodes from three manufacturers were placed both by using a micro-mechanical control tool and by hand. Insertions were performed at three different rates: 0.2 mm/s, 1.2 mm/s, and 2 mm/s (n = 20 each). Fiber-optic sensors measured pressures in scala vestibuli and tympani.

RESULTS

Electrode insertion produced pressure transients up to 174 dB SPL. ANOVA revealed that pressures were significantly lower when using the micro-mechanical control device compared with insertion by hand (p << 0.001). No difference was noted across electrode type or speed. Chi-square analysis showed a significantly lower proportion of insertions contained pressure spikes when the control system was used (p << 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Results confirm previous data that suggest CI electrode insertion can cause pressure transients with intensities similar to those elicited by high-level sounds. Results suggest that the use of a micro-mechanical insertion control system may mitigate trauma from pressure events, both by reducing the amplitude and the number of pressure spikes resulting from CI electrode insertion.

Outlook and future of inner ear therapy

Drug delivery to the inner ear is an ideal method to treat a wide variety of otologic conditions. A broad range of potential applications is just beginning to be explored. New approaches combine principles of inner ear pharmacokinetics with emerging technologies of drug delivery including novel delivery systems, drug-device combinations, and new categories of drugs. Strategies include cell-specific targeting, manipulation of gene expression, local activation following systemic delivery, and use of stem cells, viral vectors, and gene editing systems. Translation of these therapies to the clinic remains challenging given the potential risks of intracochlear and intralabyrinthine trauma, our limited understanding of the etiologies of particular inner ear disorders, and paucity of accurate diagnostic tools at the cellular level. This review provides an overview of future methods, delivery systems, disease targets, and clinical considerations required for translation to clinical medicine.

Review on Otological Robotic Systems: Toward Microrobot-Assisted Cholesteatoma Surgery

Otologic surgical procedures over time have become minimally invasive due to the development of medicine, microtechniques, and robotics. This trend then provides an expected reduction in the patient's recovery time and improvement in the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment. One of the most challenging difficulties that such techniques face are precise control of the instrument and supply of an ergonomic system to the surgeon. The objective of this literature review is to present requirements and guidelines for a surgical robotic system dedicated to middle ear surgery. This review is particularly focused on cholesteatoma surgery (diagnosis and surgical tools), which is one of the most frequent pathologies that urge for an enhanced treatment. This review also presents the current robotic systems that are implemented for otologic applications.

Design of a Tool Integrating Force Sensing With Automated Insertion in Cochlear Implantation

The quality of hearing restored to a deaf patient by a cochlear implant in hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery (and possibly also in routine cochlear implant surgery) is believed to depend on preserving delicate cochlear membranes while accurately inserting an electrode array deep into the spiral cochlea. Membrane rupture forces, and possibly, other indicators of suboptimal placement, are below the threshold detectable by human hands, motivating a force sensing insertion tool. Furthermore, recent studies have shown significant variability in manual insertion forces and velocities that may explain some instances of imperfect placement. Toward addressing this, an automated insertion tool was recently developed by Hussong et al. By following the same insertion tool concept, in this paper, we present mechanical enhancements that improve the surgeon's interface with the device and make it smaller and lighter. We also present electomechanical design of new components enabling integrated force sensing. The tool is designed to be sufficiently compact and light that it can be mounted to a microstereotactic frame for accurate image-guided preinsertion positioning. The new integrated force sensing system is capable of resolving forces as small as 0.005 N, and we provide experimental illustration of using forces to detect errors in electrode insertion.

Force measurement of insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays in vitro: comparison of surgeon to automated insertion tool

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that an automated insertion tool (i.e. a robot) can be used to duplicate a complex surgical motion in inserting cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays via the 'advance-off-stylet' (AOS) technique. As compared with human operators, the forces generated by the robot were slightly larger but the robot was more reliable (i.e. less force maxima).

OBJECTIVES

We present force data collected during CI electrode insertion by human operators and by an automated insertion tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a three-dimensional, anatomically correct, translucent model of the scala tympani chamber of the cochlea, CI electrodes were inserted either by one of three surgeons (26 insertions) or by the robotic insertion tool (8 insertions). Force was recorded using a load beam cell calibrated for expected forces of <0.1 Newtons (N). The insertions were also videotaped to allow correlation of force with depth of penetration into the cochlea and speed of insertion.

RESULTS

Average insertion force used by the surgeons was 0.004+/-0.001 N and for the insertion tool it was 0.005+/-0.014 N (p<0.00001, Student's t test). While the average insertion force of the automated tool was larger than that of the surgeons, the surgeons did have intermittent peaks during the AOS component of the insertion (between 120 degrees and 200 degrees ).

Force of cochlear implant electrode insertion performed by a robotic insertion tool: comparison of traditional versus Advance Off-Stylet techniques

OBJECTIVE

Robotic cochlear implant electrode array insertion offers substantial potential advantages, namely repeatability and minimization of insertion forces, leading to decreased intracochlear trauma. Using such a robotic insertion tool, we sought to analyze force profiles during deployment of stylet-containing electrode arrays using either traditional insertion, in which the stylet is withdrawn after complete insertion of the electrode, or Advance Off-Stylet (AOS) insertion, in which the stylet is withdrawn simultaneous with electrode array insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

INTERVENTIONS

A robotic cochlear implant insertion tool coupled with a force-sensing carriage was used to perform electrode array insertions into an anatomically correct, three-dimensional scala tympani model during either straight insertion (n = 4) or AOS insertion (n = 4).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Both insertion techniques begin with a 7-mm straight insertion during which forces were similar averaging approximately 0.006 N. For insertion from 7 to 17 mm, traditional insertion forces averaged 0.046 ± 0.027 N, with a peak of 0.093 N, and AOS insertion forces averaged 0.008 ± 0.006 N, with a peak of 0.034 N. Beyond 9.74 mm, the difference between traditional and AOS insertion forces was highly significant.

CONCLUSION

With the use of a robotic insertion tool, which minimizes operator variability and maximizes repeatability, we have shown that cochlear implant electrode insertion via AOS is associated with lower average and maximum insertion forces compared with traditional insertion. These findings support the use of AOS over traditional, straight insertion.

Determination of the curling behavior of a preformed cochlear implant electrode array

PURPOSE

Accurate insertion of a cochlear implant electrode array into the cochlea's helical shape is a crucial step for residual hearing preservation. In image-guided surgery, especially using an automated insertion tool, the overall accuracy of the operative procedure can be improved by adapting the electrode array's intracochlear movement to the individual cochlear shape.

METHODS

The curling characteristic of a commercially available state-of-the-art preformed electrode array (Cochlear Ltd. Contour Advance(TM) Electrode Array) was determined using an image-processing algorithm to detect its shape in series of images. An automatic image-processing procedure was developed using Matlab and the Image Processing Toolbox (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) to determine the complete curvature of the electrode array by identifying the 22 platinum contacts of the electrode. A logarithmic spiral was used for a comprehensive mathematical description of the shape of the electrode array. A fitting algorithm for nonlinear least-squares problems was used to provide a complete mathematical description of the electrode array. The system was tested for curling behavior as a function of stylet extraction using nine Contour Advance Research Electrodes (RE) and additionally for nine Contour Advance Practice Electrodes (PE).

RESULTS

All arrays show a typical pattern of curling with adequate predictability after the first 2 or 3 millimeters of stylet extraction. Although non-negligible variations in the overall curling behavior were detected, the electrode arrays show a characteristic movement due to the stylet extraction and only vary minimally after this initial phase.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the risk of intracochlear trauma can be reduced if the specific curling behavior of the electrode carrier is incorporated into the insertion algorithm. Furthermore, the determination of the curling behavior is an essential step in computer-aided cochlear implant electrode development. Experimental data are required for accurate evaluation of the simulation model.

An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants: another step towards atraumatic cochlear implant surgery

PURPOSE

Atraumatic electrode insertion has been identified to be a crucial step for the preservation of residual hearing abilities, which allows hybrid electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS). The authors propose a tool for automation of the insertion process to achieve this.

METHODS

General benefits as well as concept and design of an automated insertion tool are presented. Thirty insertions of Nucleus 24 Contour Advance Practice Electrodes in an artificial scala tympani model as well as 20 insertions in a human cochlea specimen were performed using the tool, implementing the AOS technique. For both studies, the achieved insertion depth angle was evaluated by photographic or X-ray documentation.

RESULTS

The mean achieved insertion depth angle was 410 degrees for the lubricated model and 330 degrees for the human cochlea specimen.

CONCLUSION

The automated insertion tool has proven its capability to perform electrode insertions with final insertion depth angles within the target range of a standard cochlear implant surgery. Additionally, to the knowledge of the authors, it represents the only possibility to automatically insert cochlear implant electrodes via minimally invasive approaches.

A robot-guided minimally invasive approach for cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results of a temporal bone study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to create an access canal to the inner ear, by drilling, and perform the cochleostomy for cochlear implant surgery using robot guidance.

METHODS

A robot, a surgical drill and an Image-Guided Surgery (IGS) system were combined in a closed-loop setup. Ten temporal bones were scanned at the planning stages of the procedure. The robot guided the drill along the preplanned trajectory and created the approach. Postoperative scans were obtained.

RESULTS

The cochleostomy was performed completely in nine out of ten cases. This did not prove possible for one of the specimens, the target site selected being in too superficial a location in relation to the round window. No violation of the facial nerve took place, although the chorda tympani nerve was violated in one case and the stapes in two. It was obvious during preoperative planning that these structures would be violated, but this was accepted in order to maintain a safety margin from the facial nerve. No other unforeseen damage occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study suggests that robot-guided drilling of a minimally invasive approach to the cochlea might be feasible, but further improvements are necessary before any clinical application becomes possible. Where the width of the facial recess is less than 2.5 mm, the chorda tympani nerve and the ossicles are at risk.

[Surgical technique in cochlear implantation]

The cochlear implant (CI) has become a standard option for treating prelingually deaf children. But postlingual late deafness in adults is becoming increasingly common. In addition, hybrid implantation with a CI and a hearing aid in the same ear has come into focus, which demands a soft insertion technique that spares the apical parts of the cochlea. Also, the chorda tympani should be saved, especially in bilateral implantations, which are gaining importance because improved speech discrimination in noisy conditions is seen as proven today. Control of the electrode position intraoperatively with intraoperative computed tomography can further increase the safety and reliability of the position. The position and length of the skin incision is a more aesthetic issue. Future developments will include fully implantable CIs and navigation-assisted, minimally invasive drilling of a hole from the surface of the skull into the cochlea. Bioactive, neurotrophic-drug-releasing electrode designs for improved and sustainable connectivity to the neurons may become applicable.