Cluster-then-classify methodology for the identification of pain episodes in chronic diseases

A scoping review of the clinical application of machine learning in data-driven population segmentation analysis

OBJECTIVE

Data-driven population segmentation is commonly used in clinical settings to separate the heterogeneous population into multiple relatively homogenous groups with similar healthcare features. In recent years, machine learning (ML) based segmentation algorithms have garnered interest for their potential to speed up and improve algorithm development across many phenotypes and healthcare situations. This study evaluates ML-based segmentation with respect to (1) the populations applied, (2) the segmentation details, and (3) the outcome evaluations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were used following the PRISMA-ScR criteria. Peer-reviewed studies in the English language that used data-driven population segmentation analysis on structured data from January 2000 to October 2022 were included.

RESULTS

We identified 6077 articles and included 79 for the final analysis. Data-driven population segmentation analysis was employed in various clinical settings. K-means clustering is the most prevalent unsupervised ML paradigm. The most common settings were healthcare institutions. The most common targeted population was the general population.

DISCUSSION

Although all the studies did internal validation, only 11 papers (13.9%) did external validation, and 23 papers (29.1%) conducted methods comparison. The existing papers discussed little validating the robustness of ML modeling.

CONCLUSION

Existing ML applications on population segmentation need more evaluations regarding giving tailored, efficient integrated healthcare solutions compared to traditional segmentation analysis. Future ML applications in the field should emphasize methods' comparisons and external validation and investigate approaches to evaluate individual consistency using different methods.

Machine-learning based approach to predict anti-CGRP response in patients with migraine: multicenter Spanish study

BACKGROUND

To date, several variables have been associated with anti-CGRP receptor or ligand-antibody response with disparate results. Our objective is to determine whether machine learning (ML)-based models can predict 6, 9 and 12 months response to anti-CGRP receptor or ligand therapies among migraine patients.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter analysis of a prospectively collected data cohort of patients with migraine receiving anti-CGRP therapies. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Response rate defined in the 30% to 50% range -or at least 30%-, in the 50% to 75% range -or at least 50%-, and response rate over 75% reduction in the number of headache days per month at 6, 9 and 12 months. A sequential forward feature selector was used for variable selection and ML-based predictive models response to anti-CGRP therapies at 6, 9 and 12 months, with models' accuracy not less than 70%, were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 712 patients were included, 93% women, aged 48 years (SD=11.7). Eighty-three percent had chronic migraine. ML models using headache days/month, migraine days/month and HIT-6 variables yielded predictions with a F1 score range of 0.70-0.97 and AUC (area under the receiver operating curve) score range of 0.87-0.98. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) summary plots and dependence plots were generated to evaluate the relevance of the factors associated with the prediction of the above-mentioned response rates.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study, ML models can predict anti-CGRP response at 6, 9 and 12 months. This study provides a predictive tool to be used in a real-world setting.