1
|
Bhidayasiri R. The grand challenge at the frontiers of neurotechnology and its emerging clinical applications. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1314477. [PMID: 38299015 PMCID: PMC10827995 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1314477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roongroj Bhidayasiri
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jwa AS, Shim J, Choi S, Eom J, Kim S, Ryu YJ. An XYZ-axis Matrix Approach for the Integration of Neuroscience and Neuroethics. Exp Neurobiol 2023; 32:8-19. [PMID: 36919332 PMCID: PMC10017846 DOI: 10.5607/en22032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The recent, unprecedented advancement in neuroscience has led to new discoveries about the human brain and its function. Yet at the same time, it has spurred novel ethical and regulatory issues, and the field of neuroethics has emerged as an interdisciplinary endeavor to address these issues. Across the globe, extensive efforts have been underway to achieve the integration of neuroscience and Neuroethics, with active engagement not only from academia but also from the government, the public, and industry. However, in some countries, integrating neuroscience and neuroethics has proved to be a particularly challenging task. For example, in South Korea, the government has primarily driven the integration effort, and only a small group of researchers is properly trained for conducting an interdisciplinary evaluation of ethical, legal, social, and cultural implications (ELSCI) of neurotechnology. On the basis of the last few years of experience pursuing a government-funded neuroethics project in South Korea, we developed a new operational framework to provide practical guidance on ELSCI research. This framework consists of the X, Y, and Z axes; the X-axis represents a target neurotechnology, the Y-axis represents different developmental stages of the technology, and the Z-axis represents ELSCI issues that may arise from the development and use of the neurotechnology. Here we also present a step-by-step workflow to apply this matrix framework, from organizing a panel for a target neurotechnology to facilitating stakeholder discussion through public hearings. This framework will enable meaningful integration of neuroscience and neuroethics to promote responsible innovation in neuroscience and neurotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita S Jwa
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jiwon Shim
- Department of Philosophy, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea
| | - Sinu Choi
- Institute of Liberal Art, Pukyoung National University, Busan 48513, Korea
| | - Juhee Eom
- Department of Law, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Korea
| | - Soojin Kim
- Division of Communication & Media, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea
| | - Young-Joon Ryu
- Department of Medical Ethics and Medical Humanities, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ortiz Castellanos AE, Liu CM, Shi C. Deep Mobile Linguistic Therapy for Patients with ASD. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12857. [PMID: 36232157 PMCID: PMC9566798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is one of the most complex groups of neurobehavioral and developmental conditions. The reason is the presence of three different impaired domains, such as social interaction, communication, and restricted repetitive behaviors. Some children with ASD may not be able to communicate using language or speech. Many experts propose that continued therapy in the form of software training in this area might help to bring improvement. In this work, we propose a design of software speech therapy system for ASD. We combined different devices, technologies, and features with techniques of home rehabilitation. We used TensorFlow for Image Classification, ArKit for Text-to-Speech, Cloud Database, Binary Search, Natural Language Processing, Dataset of Sentences, and Dataset of Images with two different Operating Systems designed for Smart Mobile devices in daily life. This software is a combination of different Deep Learning Technologies and makes Human-Computer Interaction Therapy very easy to conduct. In addition, we explain the way these were connected and put to work together. Additionally, we explain in detail the architecture of software and how each component works together as an integrated Therapy System. Finally, it allows the patient with ASD to perform the therapy anytime and everywhere, as well as transmitting information to a medical specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Ernesto Ortiz Castellanos
- College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City 106, Taiwan or
| | - Chuan-Ming Liu
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City 106, Taiwan
| | - Chongyang Shi
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huggins JE, Krusienski D, Vansteensel MJ, Valeriani D, Thelen A, Stavisky S, Norton JJS, Nijholt A, Müller-Putz G, Kosmyna N, Korczowski L, Kapeller C, Herff C, Halder S, Guger C, Grosse-Wentrup M, Gaunt R, Dusang AN, Clisson P, Chavarriaga R, Anderson CW, Allison BZ, Aksenova T, Aarnoutse E. Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES 2022; 9:69-101. [PMID: 36908334 PMCID: PMC9997957 DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2021.2009654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting was held June 7-9th, 2021 in a virtual format. The conference continued the BCI Meeting series' interactive nature with 21 workshops covering topics in BCI (also called brain-machine interface) research. As in the past, workshops covered the breadth of topics in BCI. Some workshops provided detailed examinations of specific methods, hardware, or processes. Others focused on specific BCI applications or user groups. Several workshops continued consensus building efforts designed to create BCI standards and increase the ease of comparisons between studies and the potential for meta-analysis and large multi-site clinical trials. Ethical and translational considerations were both the primary topic for some workshops or an important secondary consideration for others. The range of BCI applications continues to expand, with more workshops focusing on approaches that can extend beyond the needs of those with physical impairments. This paper summarizes each workshop, provides background information and references for further study, presents an overview of the discussion topics, and describes the conclusion, challenges, or initiatives that resulted from the interactions and discussion at the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Huggins
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 325 East Eisenhower, Room 3017; Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744, 734-936-7177
| | - Dean Krusienski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Dept of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Antonia Thelen
- eemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - James J S Norton
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Anton Nijholt
- Faculty EEMCS, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gernot Müller-Putz
- Institute of Neural Engineering, GrazBCI Lab, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/4, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Nataliya Kosmyna
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Media Lab, E14-548, Cambridge, MA 02139, Unites States
| | | | | | - Christian Herff
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christoph Guger
- g.tec medical engineering GmbH/Guger Technologies OG, Austria, Sierningstrasse 14, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria, +43725122240-0
| | - Moritz Grosse-Wentrup
- Research Group Neuroinformatics, Faculty of Computer Science, Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, Data Science @ Uni Vienna University of Vienna
| | - Robert Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3520 5th Ave, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 412-383-1426
| | - Aliceson Nicole Dusang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence, RI
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ricardo Chavarriaga
- IEEE Standards Association Industry Connections group on neurotechnologies for brain-machine interface, Center for Artificial Intelligence, School of Engineering, ZHAW-Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland, Switzerland
| | - Charles W Anderson
- Department of Computer Science, Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosience Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Brendan Z Allison
- Dept. of Cognitive Science, Mail Code 0515, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, United States, 619-534-9754
| | - Tetiana Aksenova
- University Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble 38000, France
| | - Erik Aarnoutse
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paek AY, Brantley JA, Sujatha Ravindran A, Nathan K, He Y, Eguren D, Cruz-Garza JG, Nakagome S, Wickramasuriya DS, Chang J, Rashed-Al-Mahfuz M, Amin MR, Bhagat NA, Contreras-Vidal JL. A Roadmap Towards Standards for Neurally Controlled End Effectors. IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 2:84-90. [PMID: 35402986 PMCID: PMC8979628 DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2021.3059161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The control and manipulation of various types of end effectors such as powered exoskeletons, prostheses, and ‘neural’ cursors by brain-machine interface (BMI) systems has been the target of many research projects. A seamless “plug and play” interface between any BMI and end effector is desired, wherein similar user's intent cause similar end effectors to behave identically. This report is based on the outcomes of an IEEE Standards Association Industry Connections working group on End Effectors for Brain-Machine Interfacing that convened to identify and address gaps in the existing standards for BMI-based solutions with a focus on the end-effector component. A roadmap towards standardization of end effectors for BMI systems is discussed by identifying current device standards that are applicable for end effectors. While current standards address basic electrical and mechanical safety, and to some extent, performance requirements, several gaps exist pertaining to unified terminologies, data communication protocols, patient safety and risk mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Justin A Brantley
- University of Houston Houston TX 77204 USA
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jesus G Cruz-Garza
- University of Houston Houston TX 77204 USA
- Department of Design and Environmental AnalysisCornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA
| | | | | | | | - Md Rashed-Al-Mahfuz
- University of Houston Houston TX 77204 USA
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Rajshahi Rajshahi 6205 Bangladesh
| | | | - Nikunj A Bhagat
- University of Houston Houston TX 77204 USA
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research Manhasset NY 11030 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chavarriaga R, Carey C, Luis Contreras-Vidal J, McKinney Z, Bianchi L. Standardization of Neurotechnology for Brain-Machine Interfacing: State of the Art and Recommendations. IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 2:71-73. [PMID: 35402968 PMCID: PMC8846370 DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2021.3061328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Chavarriaga
- Chair, IEEE-SA IC Activity - Neurotechnology for Brain-Machine InterfacingZurich University of Applied Sciences, ZHAW Winterthur Switzerland
| | - Carole Carey
- Chair, IEEE EMB Standards Committee Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
| | - Jose Luis Contreras-Vidal
- FIEEE, FAIMBE, Co-Chair IEEE SA IC Activity Neurotechnology for Brain-Machine Interfacing, NSF IUCRC BRAINUniversity of Houston
| | - Zach McKinney
- Chair, IEEE P2794 Standards Working Group - Reporting Standards for in vivo Neural Interface Research (RSNIR)The BioRobotics Institute; European Ctr of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa Italy
| | - Luigi Bianchi
- Chair, IEEE P2731 Standards Working Group - Unified Terminology for Brain-Computer Interfaces Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering"Tor Vergata" University of Rome Italy
| |
Collapse
|