1
|
Liu CH, Lu YS, Chen PC, Lee CF. Effects of different electrodes used in bone-guided extracochlear implants on electrical stimulation of auditory nerves in guinea pigs. Tzu Chi Med J 2020; 33:42-48. [PMID: 33505877 PMCID: PMC7821833 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_46_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Conventional cochlear implants provide patients who are deaf with hearing via electrical intracochlear stimulations. Stimulation electrodes are inserted into the cochlea through a cochleostomy or round window membrane (RWM) approach. However, these methods might induce cochlear ossificans and loss of residual hearing by damaging inner ear structures. To avoid an invasive electrode insertion, we developed a novel bone-guided extracochlear implant that stimulated the auditory nerves between the cochlear bones and the RWM to prevent cochlea damage. Power consumption plays an important role in wireless implantable electronic devices. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of different electrodes on the stimulating threshold currents of the auditory nerve and the power consumption of bone-guided extracochlear implants using a commercial stimulator. Materials and Methods: Inert aurum (Au) electrodes were compared with biocompatible platinum (Pt) and iridium oxide (IrOx) electrodes in practical implantable applications. IrOx electrodes were used for their high-charge storage capacity, low impedance, and biocompatibility. The electrodes were fabricated via sputtering and were experimentally characterized with cyclic voltammetry and then examined using in vivo tests. Results: Based on electrical auditory brainstem responses, IrOx electrodes yielded lower acoustic nerve-stimulating threshold currents (132 μA) compared with Au electrodes (204 μA). IrOx electrodes also had a lower acoustic nerve stimulating threshold current (132 μA) compared with Pt electrodes (168 μA). Conclusion: As expected, IrOx electrodes were beneficial in the development of multielectrode bone-guided extracochlear implants, with the lowest acoustic nerve-stimulating threshold and current consumptions compared with Au and Pt electrodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Hao Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Shan Lu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Chun Chen
- Department of Materials and Mineral Resource Engineering, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Fone Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hualian Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Histone acetylation in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2019; 133:895-902. [PMID: 31506109 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215119001865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between the therapeutic effect of intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion and histone acetylation in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS Thirty-four refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients were enrolled and treated with intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Pure tone average, acetylated histone H3, acetylated histone H4 and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited to obtain normal reference values. RESULTS Pure tone average in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients improved from 84.14 ± 13.54 dB to 73.56 ± 18.45 dB after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Up-regulations in HDAC2 protein level, and down-regulations in histone H3 and H4 acetylation were observed in the intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion sensitive group (pure tone average gain of 15 dB or more), while no significant changes were observed in the intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion insensitive group (pure tone average gain of less than 15 dB). CONCLUSION Intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion can improve hearing in a considerable number of refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. The therapeutic effect is closely related to reduced histone acetylation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimoji M, Ramaswamy B, Shukoor MI, Benhal P, Broda A, Kulkarni S, Malik P, McCaffrey B, Lafond JF, Nacev A, Weinberg IN, Shapiro B, Depireux DA. Toxicology study for magnetic injection of prednisolone into the rat cochlea. Eur J Pharm Sci 2019; 126:33-48. [PMID: 29933075 PMCID: PMC6235712 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
This paper investigates the safety of a novel 'magnetic injection' method of delivering therapy to the cochlea, in a rodent model. In this method of administration, a magnetic field is employed to actively transport drug-eluting superparamagnetic iron-oxide core nanoparticles into the cochlea, where they then release their drug payload (we delivered the steroid prednisolone). Our study design and selection of control groups was based on published regulatory guidance for safety studies that involve local drug delivery. We tested for both single and multiple delivery doses to the cochlea, and found that magnetic delivery did not harm hearing. There was no statistical difference in hearing between magnetically treated ears versus ears that received intra-tympanic steroid (a mimic of a standard-of-care for sudden sensorineural hearing loss), both 2 and 30 days after treatment. Since our treatment is local to the ear, the levels of steroid and iron circulating systemically after our treatment were low, below mass-spectrometry detection limits for the steroid and no different from normal for iron. No adverse findings were observed in ear tissue histopathology or in animal gross behavior. At 2 and 30 days after treatment, inflammatory changes examined in the ear were limited to the middle ear, were very mild in severity, and by day 90 there was ongoing and almost complete reversibility of these changes. There were no ear tissue scarring or hemorrhage trends associated with magnetic delivery. In summary, after conducting a pre-clinical safety study, no adverse safety issues were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shimoji
- Otomagnetics, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, United States of America.
| | - B Ramaswamy
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - M I Shukoor
- Otomagnetics, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, United States of America
| | - P Benhal
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - A Broda
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - S Kulkarni
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - P Malik
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - B McCaffrey
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | | | - A Nacev
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - I N Weinberg
- Otomagnetics, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, United States of America
| | - B Shapiro
- Otomagnetics, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, United States of America; Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America; Institute for Systems Research (ISR), University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| | - D A Depireux
- Otomagnetics, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, United States of America; Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America; Institute for Systems Research (ISR), University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frisina RD, Budzevich M, Zhu X, Martinez GV, Walton JP, Borkholder DA. Animal model studies yield translational solutions for cochlear drug delivery. Hear Res 2018; 368:67-74. [PMID: 29793764 PMCID: PMC6165691 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The field of hearing and deafness research is about to enter an era where new cochlear drug delivery methodologies will become more innovative and plentiful. The present report provides a representative review of previous studies where efficacious results have been obtained with animal models, primarily rodents, for protection against acute hearing loss such as acoustic trauma due to noise overexposure, antibiotic use and cancer chemotherapies. These approaches were initiated using systemic injections or oral administrations of otoprotectants. Now, exciting new options for local drug delivery, which opens up the possibilities for utilization of novel otoprotective drugs or compounds that might not be suitable for systemic use, or might interfere with the efficacious actions of chemotherapeutic agents or antibiotics, are being developed. These include interesting use of nanoparticles (with or without magnetic field supplementation), hydrogels, cochlear micropumps, and new transtympanic injectable compounds, sometimes in combination with cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Frisina
- Dept. Chemical & Biomedical Engineering, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Dept. Communication Sciences & Disorders, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Dept. Medical Engineering, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - M Budzevich
- Small Animal Imaging Lab, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - X Zhu
- Dept. Chemical & Biomedical Engineering, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Dept. Medical Engineering, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - G V Martinez
- Small Animal Imaging Lab, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J P Walton
- Dept. Communication Sciences & Disorders, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Dept. Chemical & Biomedical Engineering, Global Center for Hearing & Speech Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - D A Borkholder
- Microsystems Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mamelle E, El Kechai N, Adenis V, Nguyen Y, Sterkers O, Agnely F, Bochot A, Edeline JM, Ferrary E. Assessment of the efficacy of a local steroid rescue treatment administered 2 days after a moderate noise-induced trauma in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 2018; 138:610-616. [PMID: 29504828 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1438659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intratympanic injection of corticosteroids membrane after noise-induced hearing loss is an accepted alternative to general administration. We investigated the effect on hearing of a hyaluronic acid gel with liposomes loaded with dexamethasone (DexP) administered into the middle ear. METHODS An acute acoustic trauma was performed to 13 guinea pigs for a period of 1 h on Day -2. Two 2 days after the noise trauma, the animals were then assigned randomly to four experimental groups: control without gel, gel injection, gel-containing free DexP, gel-containing DexP loaded into liposomes. Auditory thresholds were measured with Auditory Brainstem Response before Day -2 and at Day 0, Day 7 and Day 30 after noise trauma. RESULTS Seven days after, a complete hearing recovery was observed in the control group at all frequencies apart from 8 kHz, and no recovery was observed in the three groups receiving a gel injection. Thirty days after trauma, all of the animals had recovered normal hearing, apart from at the 8-kHz frequency, with similar auditory thresholds. CONCLUSIONS Local DexP administration 48 h after a mild acoustic trauma did not improve hearing recovery, even with a sustained release in a specific gel formulation designed for inner ear therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Mamelle
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité “Réhabilitation Chirurgicale Mini-Invasive et Robotisée de l’Audition”, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology, Unit of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, AP-HP, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Naila El Kechai
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Institut Galien Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8612, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France
| | - Victor Adenis
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), Orsay, France
| | - Yann Nguyen
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité “Réhabilitation Chirurgicale Mini-Invasive et Robotisée de l’Audition”, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology, Unit of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, AP-HP, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité “Réhabilitation Chirurgicale Mini-Invasive et Robotisée de l’Audition”, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology, Unit of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, AP-HP, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Florence Agnely
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Institut Galien Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8612, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France
| | - Amélie Bochot
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Institut Galien Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8612, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, France
| | - Jean Marc Edeline
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 9197, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), Orsay, France
| | - Evelyne Ferrary
- Sorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité “Réhabilitation Chirurgicale Mini-Invasive et Robotisée de l’Audition”, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|