Tremor Suppression Using Functional Electrical Stimulation

Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor are two major causes of pathological tremor among people over 60 years old. Due to the side effects and complications of traditional tremor management methods such as medication and deep brain surgery, non invasive tremor suppression methods have become more popular in recent years. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is one of the methods used to reduce tremor in several studies. However, the effect of different FES parameters on tremor suppression and discomfort level, including amplitude, the number of pulses in each stimulation burst, frequency, and pulse width is yet to be studied for longer stimulation durations. Therefore, in this work, experiments were performed on 14 participants with PD to evaluate the effect of thirty seconds of out-of-phase electrical stimulation on wrist tremor at rest. Trials were conducted by varying the stimulation amplitude and the number of pulses while keeping the frequency and pulse width constant. Each test was repeated three times for each participant. The results showed an overall tremor suppression for 11 out of 14 participants and no average positive effects for three participants. It is concluded that despite the effectiveness of FES in tremor suppression, each set of FES parameters showed different suppression levels among participants due to the variability of tremor over time. Thus, for this method to be effective, an adaptive control system would be required to tune FES parameters in real time according to changes in tremor during extended stimulation periods.

Simulation of FES on the forearm with muscle-specific activation resolution

Introduction

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an established method of supporting neurological rehabilitation. However, particularly on the forearm, it still cannot elicit selective muscle activations that form the basis of complex hand movements. Current research approaches in the context of selective muscle activation often attempt to enable targeted stimulation by increasing the number of electrodes and combining them in electrode arrays. In order to determine the best stimulation positions and settings, manual or semi-automated algorithms are used. This approach is limited due to experimental limitations. The supportive use of simulation studies is well-established, but existing simulation models are not suitable for analyses of selective muscle activation due to missing or arbitrarily arranged innervation zones.

Methods

This study introduces a new modeling method to design a person-specific digital twin that enables the prediction of muscle activations during FES on the forearm. The designed individual model consists of three parts: an anatomically based 3D volume conductor, a muscle-specific nerve fiber arrangement in various regions of interest (ROIs), and a standard nerve model. All processes were embedded in scripts or macros to enable automated changes to the model and the simulation setup.

Results

The experimental evaluation of simulated strength-duration diagrams showed good coincidence. The relative differences of the simulated amplitudes to the mean amplitude of the four experiments were in the same range as the inter-experimental differences, with mean values between 0.005 and 0.045. Based on these results, muscle-specific activation thresholds were determined and integrated into the simulation process. With this modification, simulated force-intensity curves showed good agreement with additionally measured curves.

Discussion

The results show that the model is suitable for simulating realistic muscle-specific activations. Since complex hand movements are physiologically composed of individual, selective muscle activations, it can be assumed that the model is also suitable for simulating these movements. Therefore, this study presents a new and very promising approach for developing new applications and products in the context of the rehabilitation of sensorimotor disorders.

Modeling the excitation of nerve axons under transcutaneous stimulation

Computational models enable a safe and convenient way to study the excitation of nerve fibers under external stimulation. Contemporary models calculate the electric field distribution from transcutaneous stimulation and the resulting neuronal response separately. This study uses finite element methods to develop a multi-scale model that couples electric fields within macroscopic tissue layers and microscopic nerve fibers in a single-stage computational framework. The model included a triaxial myelinated nerve fiber bundle embedded within a volume conductor of tissue layers to represent the median nerve innervating the forearm muscles. The model captured the excitability of nerve fibers under transcutaneous stimulation and their nerve-tissue interactions to a transient external stimulus. The determinants of the strength-duration curve, rheobase, and chronaxie for the proposed model had close correlations with in-vivo experimentation on human participants. Additionally, the excitability indices for the triaxial myelinated nerve fiber implemented using the finite element method agreed well with experimental data from the literature. The validity of the proposed model encourages its use for applications involving transcutaneous stimulation. Capable of capturing field distribution across realistic morphologies, the model can serve as a testbed to improve stimulation protocols and electrode designs with subject-level specificity.

Conformable Electrode Arrays for Wearable Neuroprostheses

Wearable electrode arrays can selectively stimulate muscle groups by modulating their shape, size, and position over a targeted region. They can potentially revolutionize personalized rehabilitation by being noninvasive and allowing easy donning and doffing. Nevertheless, users should feel comfortable using such arrays, as they are typically worn for an extended time period. Additionally, to deliver safe and selective stimulation, these arrays must be tailored to a user's physiology. Fabricating customizable electrode arrays needs a rapid and economical technique that accommodates scalability. By leveraging a multilayer screen-printing technique, this study aims to develop personalizable electrode arrays by embedding conductive materials into silicone-based elastomers. Accordingly, the conductivity of a silicone-based elastomer was altered by adding carbonaceous material. The 1:8 and 1:9 weight ratio percentages of carbon black (CB) to elastomer achieved conductivities between 0.0021-0.0030 S cm^-1 and were suitable for transcutaneous stimulation. Moreover, these ratios maintained their stimulation performance after several stretching cycles of up to 200%. Thus, a soft, conformable electrode array with a customizable design was demonstrated. Lastly, the efficacy of the proposed electrode arrays to stimulate hand function tasks was evaluated by in vivo experiments. The demonstration of such arrays encourages the realization of cost-effective, wearable stimulation systems for hand function restoration.

Personalized protocol and scoring scale for functional electrical stimulation of the hand: A pilot feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Complex personalized Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) protocols for calibrating parameters and electrode positioning have been proposed, most being time-consuming or technically cumbersome for clinical settings. Therefore, there is a need for new personalized FES protocols that generate comfortable, functional hand movements, while being feasible for clinical translation.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a personalized FES protocol, comprising electrode placement and parameter selection, to generate hand opening (HO), power grasp (PW) and precision grip (PG) movements, and compare in a pilot feasibility study its performance to a non-personalized protocol based on standard FES guidelines.

METHODS

Two FES protocols, one personalized (P1) and one non-personalized (P2), were used to produce hand movements in twenty-three healthy participants. FES-induced movements were assessed with a new scoring scale which comprises items for selectivity, functionality, and comfort.

RESULTS

Higher FES-HSS scores were obtained with P1 for all movements: HO (p= 0.00013), PW (p= 0.00007), PG (p= 0.00460). Electrode placement time was significantly shorter for P2 (p= 0.00003). Comfort scores were similar for both protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

The personalized protocol for electrode placement and parameter selection enabled functional FES-induced hand movements and presented advantages over a non-personalized protocol. This protocol warrants further investigation to confirm its suitability for developing upper-limb rehabilitation interventions with clinical translational potential.