1
|
Newman M, Rasiah PK, Kusunose J, Rex TS, Mahadevan-Jansen A, Hardenburger J, Jansen ED, Millis B, Caskey CF. Ultrasound Modulates Calcium Activity in Cultured Neurons, Glial Cells, Endothelial Cells and Pericytes. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2024; 50:341-351. [PMID: 38087717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ultrasound is being researched as a method to modulate the brain. Studies of the interaction of sound with neurons support the hypothesis that mechanosensitive ion channels play an important role in ultrasound neuromodulation. The response of cells other than neurons (e.g., astrocytes, pericytes and endothelial cells) have not been fully characterized, despite playing an important role in brain function. METHODS To address this gap in knowledge, we examined cultured murine primary cortical neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells and pericytes in an in vitro widefield microscopy setup during application of a 500 ms burst of 250 kHz focused ultrasound over a pressure range known to elicit neuromodulation. We examined cell membrane health in response to a range of pulses and used optical calcium indicators in conjunction with pharmacological antagonists to selectively block different groups of thermo- and mechanosensitive ion channels known to be responsive to ultrasound. RESULTS All cell types experienced an increase in calcium fluorescence in response to ultrasound. Gadolinium (Gad), 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) and ruthenium red (RR) reduced the percentage of responding neurons and magnitude of response. The percentage of astrocytes responding was significantly lowered only by Gad, whereas both 2-APB and Gad decreased the amplitude of the fluorescence response. 2-APB decreased the percentage of responding endothelial cells, whereas only Gad reduced the magnitude of responses. Pericytes exposed to RR or Gad were less likely to respond to stimulation. RR had no detectable effect on the magnitude of the pericyte responses while 2-APB and Gad significantly decreased the fluorescence intensity, despite not affecting the percentage responding. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the role of non-neuronal cells during FUS neuromodulation. All of the investigated cell types are sensitive to mechanical ultrasound stimulation and rely on mechanosensitive ion channels to undergo ultrasound neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malachy Newman
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pratheepa Kumari Rasiah
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jiro Kusunose
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tonia S Rex
- Department of Opthalmology & Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jacob Hardenburger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - E Duco Jansen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bryan Millis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Charles F Caskey
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manuel TJ, Sigona MK, Phipps MA, Kusunose J, Luo H, Yang PF, Newton AT, Gore JC, Grissom W, Chen LM, Caskey CF. Small volume blood-brain barrier opening in macaques with a 1 MHz ultrasound phased array. J Control Release 2023; 363:707-720. [PMID: 37827222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
The use of focused ultrasound to open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has the potential to deliver drugs to specific regions of the brain. The size of the BBB opening and ability to localize the opening determines the spatial extent and is a limiting factor in many applications of BBB opening where targeting a small brain region is desired. Here we evaluate the performance of a system designed for small opening volumes and highlight the unique challenges associated with pushing the spatial precision of this technique. To achieve small volume openings in cortical regions of the macaque brain, we tested a custom 1 MHz array transducer integrated into a magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound system. Using real-time cavitation monitoring, we demonstrated twelve instances of single sonication, small volume BBB opening with average volumes of 59 ± 37 mm3 and 184 ± 2 mm3 in cortical and subcortical targets, respectively. We found high correlation between subject-specific acoustic simulations and observed openings when incorporating grey matter segmentation (R2 = 0.8577), and the threshold for BBB opening based on simulations was 0.53 MPa. Analysis of MRI-based safety assessment and cavitation signals indicate a safe pressure range for 1 MHz BBB opening and suggest that our system can be used to deliver drugs and gene therapy to small brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Manuel
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michelle K Sigona
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - M Anthony Phipps
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jiro Kusunose
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Huiwen Luo
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pai-Feng Yang
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Allen T Newton
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John C Gore
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - William Grissom
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Li Min Chen
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Charles F Caskey
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|