Asian consensus on assessment and management of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis with topical therapy

Evaluation of β2-microglobulin in the condition and prognosis of psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have linked the inflammatory pathway in psoriasis and metabolic disease, while no specific marker defined it. It is worth exploring the association of β2-microglobulin (β2M) in psoriasis severity and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between blood β2M level and psoriasis severity, to explore the inflammatory factors influencing the occurrence of psoriasis comorbidities such as arthritis, diabetes, and hypertension.

METHODS

Ninety-seven psoriasis patients were analyzed in the cohort retrospective study during 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Significantly higher levels of blood β2M and ESR were observed in the group that patients' PASI ≥10 than in the group that PASI <10. Blood β2M level had strong significantly positive correlations with the PASI in Pearson's correlation analysis. In the model that systemic inflammatory factors to find psoriasis comorbidity risk factors, logistic regression analysis showed that blood β2M level was the significant risk factor associated with diabetes and hypertension. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was the significant risk factor associated with arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a severer psoriasis tended to have higher blood β2M levels and severer inflammatory state. In the systemic inflammation indexes, the level of blood β2M affected the risk of hypertension and diabetes, and hsCRP affected the risk of arthritis in patients with psoriasis.

Perspectives of Japanese patients on psoriatic disease burden: Results from "Psoriasis and Beyond," the Global Psoriatic Disease Survey

Psoriatic disease (PsD) is a chronic disease affecting skin (psoriasis) and joints (psoriatic arthritis, PsA) that has a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). We report findings from the Japanese subgroup of patients included in Psoriasis and Beyond: The Global Psoriatic Disease Survey, a cross-sectional, quantitative online survey of patients with self-reported, healthcare professional (HCP)-diagnosed, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with or without PsA. Eligible patients who were recruited online completed a 25-min internet-based survey in Japanese. We assessed patients' understanding of the systemic nature of PsD, disease burden, perception towards their HCPs, treatment expectations, and satisfaction with care. Of the 148 patients, 74% were females. In total, 65% of patients were aware of the systemic nature of their disease. A minority of patients (27%) were aware that PsA was related to their psoriasis, and 30% and 42% of patients were unaware of any manifestations and comorbidities, respectively, related to PsD. Overall, 21% of patients reported that their disease has a "very large" to "extremely large" impact on their QOL (assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index score), while the majority (61%) reported a "small" effect or "no effect" at all on QOL. Patients experienced stigma and discrimination and had a negative impact on relationships due to PsD. More patients with psoriasis and concomitant PsA (66%) were satisfied with their current treatment than those with psoriasis alone (46%). Overall, 41% of patients were not involved in deciding their treatment goals. These results suggest that Japanese patients may not be fully aware of the systemic nature of PsD, its manifestations and comorbidities. While these patients were somewhat satisfied with their current treatment, they were only occasionally consulted in deciding treatment goals. Policy measures are required to address the stigma and discrimination experienced by patients. Increased patient participation in their care supports shared decision-making and enhanced treatment outcomes.

Validation and application of the Dermatology Life Quality Index score, a modification of the DLQI score, in psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

All the scoring methods for the DLQI miss the moderate impact of the disease on patients, which may underestimate the impact of psoriasis on patients' quality of life. To improve the accuracy of the assessment of the Dermatology Life Quality Index score (DLQI) for patients with psoriasis, this study proposed and validated a new scoring method, the DLQI-NS, which includes the moderate impact option in the self-assessment of each item in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which patients with psoriasis were enrolled. A total of 425 participants completed the DLQI, DLQI-NS and Skindex-16 questionnaires. Reliability, validity, ceiling and floor effects were evaluated of both DLQI and DLQI-NS questionnaires.

RESULTS

About 14.4-32.5% of the patients reported a moderate impact on quality of life. The DLQI-NS allowed 17 more patients (4.0%) to achieve severe disease. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the DLQI-NS was 0.90, and that of the DLQI was 0.89. The KMO test results for the DLQI-NS and DLQI were 0.927 and 0.916, respectively. One factor was identified for each questionnaire. The items of the DLQI-NS showed an item-total correlation from 0.52 to 0.82, and the DLQI questionnaire's item-total correlation ranged from 0.47 to 0.83. The DLQI-NS, DLQI total score and Skindex-16 had Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. Both the DLQI-NS and DLQI showed significant moderate correlations with the BSA (0.51 vs. 0.50) and PASI (0.47 vs. 0.46). No ceiling effects were observed for any of the items of both questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the DLQI-NS and DLQI were good, but the DLQI-NS was superior to the DLQI. The DLQI-NS is an effective self-assessment tool for assessing quality of life in psoriasis patients.

Improvements in Plaque Psoriasis Associated with Calcipotriol/Betamethasone Aerosol Foam Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis of Non-interventional Studies and Clinical Experience

INTRODUCTION

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease that is associated with extensive disease burden that often requires long-term therapy. Treatment of psoriasis with 4 weeks of the aerosol foam formulation of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD; Enstilar®, LEO Pharma) has been demonstrated to be effective, well tolerated, and associated with high patient satisfaction. Cal/BD foam is approved as a first-line treatment in multiple countries, where several non-interventional studies (NIS) have corroborated the beneficial efficacy and safety profiles determined in the randomized clinical trials. Heterogenicity in these NIS, however, prevents the use of a data pooling strategy for comparisons of effectiveness outcomes across different patient populations.

METHODS

Therefore, here, we report on a post hoc analysis of effectiveness data consolidated from six prospective NIS to discern any differences in improvement in signs and symptoms of psoriasis attributable to Cal/BD foam treatment across the countries. In addition, we provide real-world experience of clinicians with Cal/BD foam treatment, factoring in changes in usage since these NIS were performed in their local markets.

RESULTS

This post hoc analysis of Cal/BD foam NIS brings together data outside of randomized clinical trials from six countries to provide real-world evidence in 1388 patients showing that 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam is an effective and safe treatment option with quick onset of action for patients with psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

These results show that regardless of NIS location, Cal/BD foam remains a well-tolerated, efficacious option for patient care that could be used as a first-line topical therapy for mild-to-severe psoriasis.

Five-year Maintenance of Clinical Response and Consistent Safety Profile for Guselkumab in Asian patients with Psoriasis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2

INTRODUCTION

Guselkumab is a human monoclonal antibody against IL-23 used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the Asian subpopulation of VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 through 5 years.

METHODS

The proportions of guselkumab-treated Asian patients (VOYAGE 1 and 2) achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 and PASI 100, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1 and 0, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of 0/1 (week 100 through week 252) were assessed. Non-responders were patients who met the treatment failure rules. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using the as-observed methodology (no missing data imputation) for both studies and using non-responder imputation (for patients with any missing data) in VOYAGE 1. Safety outcomes were based on pooled data through week 252.

RESULTS

Response rates through week 252 for 199 Asian patients in the guselkumab group in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 76.8% and 80.6% (PASI 90), 26.8% and 38.7% (PASI 100), 64.3% and 87.1% (IGA 0/1), and 26.8% and 45.2% (IGA 0). DLQI (0/1) at week 252 was achieved by 52.7% of patients in VOYAGE 1 and 61.3% in VOYAGE 2, while DLQI (0) at week 252 was achieved by 32.7% of patients in VOYAGE 1 and 40.3% in VOYAGE 2. The safety profile was similar to the global population and remained consistent through 5 years. Asian patients were followed for a total of 814 patient-years (PY). Over 85% of the guselkumab-treated patients continued treatment through week 264. The rate of serious adverse events (AEs) at week 252 was 3.07/100 PY. Rates of AEs of interest were low: serious infections, 0.74/100 PY; nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), no patients; malignancies other than NMSC, 0.12/100 PY; and no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

CONCLUSION

These analyses confirm a continuous response over 5 years, indicating that guselkumab shows therapeutic longevity in Asian patients requiring long-term treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: VOYAGE 1 [NCT02207231] and VOYAGE 2 [NCT02207244].

Efficacy of guselkumab in difficult-to-treat psoriasis regions: Data from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Asian subpopulations

Patients with psoriasis were randomized to guselkumab, placebo or adalimumab in the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies. In this post hoc analysis, difficult-to-treat psoriasis regions in the Asian subpopulation for both the guselkumab and adalimumab groups were compared with placebo at week 16 and the active treatment groups were compared at week 24. Endpoints included patients achieving scores of 0 or 1 (clear or near clear) or 0 (clear) on the scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (ss-IGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the hands and/or feet (hf-PGA), and fingernail PGA (f-PGA), and percentage improvement in target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score through week 24. Efficacy was also assessed by prior biologic experience at baseline. A total of 199 eligible Asian patients were included. The proportion of patients achieving "clear" or "near clear" with guselkumab was superior to adalimumab at week 24 for scalp psoriasis ss-IGA (Asian patients, 72 [85.7%] vs 35 [67.3%], P = 0.004), hands and/or feet psoriasis hf-PGA (29 [82.9%] vs 16 [61.5%], P = 0.054), and similar for fingernail psoriasis f-PGA (28 [63.6%] vs 17 [54.8%], P = 0.412). Guselkumab mean improvements in NAPSI were comparable to adalimumab (39.9% vs 35.9%, P = 0.618). Overall, the complete clearance response of scalp, and hands and/or feet at week 24 occurred in a greater proportion of patients in the guselkumab group, irrespective of baseline biologic status (treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced). Guselkumab was superior to adalimumab for the treatment of scalp, and hands and/or feet psoriasis, and proportionally higher for fingernail psoriasis. Findings were comparable to the global study population.

Patient Needs in Psoriasis Treatment and their Influencing Factors: A Nationwide Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study in China

Background

The management and treatment of psoriasis has rarely considered patient needs, which are numerous, multi-dimensional and are of great importance to improving treatment outcomes.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the patients' needs for psoriasis treatment and identify factors predicting the need to make patient-centred decisions about treatment.

Materials and Methods

This nationwide multicentre cross-sectional study included subjects between October 2020 and August 2021. The status quo of the needs in psoriasis treatment and their influencing factors were analysed mainly using the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression.

Results

Information on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. Factor analysis of a specially designed questionnaire showed that rapid skin clearance, reduced treatment expense and fewer hospital visits or treatment time were the first three patient needs in psoriasis treatment. Several influencing factors were important including the sociodemographic characteristics of gender, marital status, education level and family history, special location of skin lesions, dermatology life quality index (DLQI), Investigator's Global Assessment modified 2011 (IGA mod 2011), condition of the episode, clinical type of psoriasis, seasonal exacerbation and therapy.

Conclusions

Patients with psoriasis pursued a wide range of treatment goals, with the most desired being rapid skin clearance, reduced treatment expense and time-saving. Paying attention to sex, marital status, education level, the special location of skin lesions and the DLQI will help dermatologists develop patient-centred treatment, meet the patient's needs and eventually improve the treatment outcomes.

A panel of blood-based circulatory miRNAs with diagnostic potential in patients with psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with keratinocyte hyperproliferation and T cells as key mediators of lesional and systemic inflammatory changes. To date, no suitable differential biomarkers are available for the disease diagnosis. More recently, microRNAs have been identified as critical regulators of lesional and systemic immune changes in psoriasis with diagnostic potential. We have performed expression profiling of T cell-specific miRNAs in 38 plasma samples from psoriasis vulgaris patients and an equal number of age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. Our findings have identified a panel of five blood-based circulatory miRNAs with a significant change in their expression levels, comprising miR-215, miR-148a, miR-125b-5p, miR-223, and miR-142-3p, which can differentiate psoriasis vulgaris patients from healthy individuals. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all five miRNAs individually and in combination exhibited a significant disease discriminatory area under the curve with an AUC of 0.762 and a p < 0.0001 for all the miRNAs together. Statistically, all five miRNAs in combination depicted the best-fit model in relation to disease severity (PASI) compared with individual miRNAs, with the highest R2 value of 0.94 and the lowest AIC score of 131.8. Each of the miRNAs also exhibited a significant association with at least one of the other miRNAs in the panel. Importantly, the five miRNAs in the panel regulate one or more immune-inflammation pathways based on target prediction, pathway network analysis, and validated roles in the literature. The miRNA panel provides a rationalized combination of biomarkers that can be tested further on an expanded cohort of patients for their diagnostic value.

Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient -reported outcome measure for psoriasis self-management efficacy: the self-management efficacy questionnaire among patients with psoriasis (SMEQ-PSO)

BACKGROUND

It is significant for the healthy outcome of patients with psoriasis (PSO) to improve their self-management efficacy. A standardized assessment tool, however, was lacking. Therefore, we aimed to develop a self-management efficacy questionnaire for patients with PSO (SMEQ-PSO) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study developing clinical evaluation tool was conducted from October 2021 to August 2022. In the process of developing SMEQ-PSO, three phases were involved: item generation, item evaluation, and psychometric evaluation.

RESULTS

The SMEQ-PSO with five dimensions and 28 items was developed. The questionnaire's content validity index was 0.976. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a five-factor structure (self-efficacy of psychosocial adaptation, self-efficacy of daily life management, self-efficacy of skin management, self-efficacy of disease knowledge management and self-efficacy of disease treatment management) that explained 62.039% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated appropriate fit of the five-factor model. The overall Cronbach'α coefficient was 0.930, the test-retest reliability was 0.768 and the split half reliability coefficients was 0.952.

CONCLUSIONS

The 28-item SMEQ-PSO is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to assess the self-management efficacy among patients with PSO and provide personalized interventions based on their individual circumstances to improve their health outcomes.

Basic Therapeutic Approach for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Korean Expert Consensus Using the Modified Delphi Method

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of psoriasis in Korean patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a consensus on the basic therapeutic principles for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

Using the modified Delphi method, a steering committee proposed 53 statements for the first Delphi round, which covered five subjects: (1) the goal of treatment and evaluation of disease severity, (2) topical therapy, (3) phototherapy, (4) conventional systemic therapy, and (5) biologic therapy. The panel of dermatologists scored the level of agreement for each statement on a ten-point scale with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). After discussing the results of the first round, the committee reformulated 41 statements. Finally, consensus was defined as more than 70% of the second round scores being ≥7.

RESULTS

The panel participants strongly agreed that the ideal treatment goals for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis should include complete skin clearance and high dermatological quality of life. A strong consensus was also reached on the use of topical agents for psoriasis of any severity, the consideration of phototherapy before biologics therapy, the conventional systemic agents for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and the recommendation of biologic for retractable psoriasis to conventional systemic therapy and phototherapy.

CONCLUSION

This modified Delphi panel established an expert consensus on the therapeutic approach for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis. This consensus may improve the treatment outcomes for psoriasis in Korea.

Expert Consensus on Real-World Use and Consumption Patterns of a Fixed-Dose Combination Foam for Psoriasis as a Reactive Management (RM) and Proactive Management (PAM) Regimen

INTRODUCTION

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic skin disease characterised by periods of remission and relapse and associated with considerable burden to patients and healthcare systems. For most patients, standard-of-care is reactive management (RM) with topical therapies, but, more recently, the benefits of proactive management (PAM) have been recognised. This study aimed to gain consensus on real-world use and consumption in RM versus PAM regimens, based on fixed-dose combination calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam which, following a recent update, is currently the only topical therapy for psoriasis with a long-term maintenance regimen in its label.

METHODS

The modified-Delphi approach was used to gain insights and consensus on real-world views, use and consumption in RM versus PAM from a panel of dermatologists with experience prescribing Cal/BD foam as PAM. The panel included 16 dermatologists, 4 each from France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, and included two questionnaire rounds and a meeting to obtain final consensus.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that topicals are burdensome to apply in clinical practice and that poor patient adherence, particularly long-term, is a barrier to effective psoriasis management. The panel advised that, as they prescribe a similar number of cans for RM and PAM over a given period, consumption is not a key driver influencing future decisions to prescribe PAM, even in instances where prescribing differences could be observed. Instead, the panel agreed that patient- and disease-related factors better determine patient suitability for PAM.

CONCLUSION

This modified-Delphi study confirms that prescription of RM or PAM, with Cal/BD foam, is largely driven by patient-related factors and patient involvement is key to optimise outcomes. Real-world experiences captured in this study suggest that a PAM regimen does not increase overall consumption, and thus costs per patient for payers and prescribers, in comparison to RM.

Decision-making factors for the long-term topical treatment of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: TEPPSO, a case-vignette study on clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Topical maintenance therapy strategy with regard to patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (PP) continues to be heterogeneous and insufficiently investigated in real-life clinical practice. The objective of this study was to describe the initiation of long-term maintenance treatment and to identify clinical parameters influencing the therapeutic decision.

METHODS

TEPPSO was a French and Belgian multicentre cross-sectional study based on completion of questionnaires and assessment of credible clinical scenarios of mild-to-moderate PP by physicians using the validated case-vignette method.

RESULTS

Maintenance therapy was recommended by dermatologists (Ds) and by general practitioners (GPs) in 79.1% and 76.8% of cases, respectively. GPs recommended the use of a fixed-dose combination of corticosteroid and vitamin D analogues in only 14.8% of cases, whereas this therapy was recommended by French and Belgian Ds in 54.8% and 39.8% of cases, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, significant determinants of the therapeutic decision were skin lesions impacting quality of life (OR 1.9 [95% CI: 1.1; 3.2] P=0.01) for Ds, and patient corticophobia (OR 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1; 2.7] P=0.03) or the presence of skin pruritus (OR 1.8 [95% CI: 1.2; 1.8] P=0.004) for GPs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with topical agents in patients with mild-to-moderate PP was considered in more than two thirds of cases. Heterogeneity in the choice of topical agents was evidenced particularly between Ds and GPs. Our study is the first to identify significant clinical determinants affecting the therapeutic decision. Updated and validated clinical practice guidelines are needed to ensure uniform therapeutic choices.

Long-term proactive management of psoriasis with calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate foam: an Italian consensus through a combined nominal group technique and Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Although long-term management of psoriasis is paramount, this approach is challenging in clinical practice. In the recent PSO-LONG trial, a fixed-dose combination of betamethasone dipropionate (BD) and calcipotriol (Cal) foam applied twice a week on non-consecutive days for 52 weeks (proactive treatment) reduced the risk of relapse. However, the role of Cal/BD foam in the long-term management of psoriasis needs further clarifications. The ProActive Management (PAM) program, a nationwide Italian project, aims at reaching a consensus on the role of proactive management of psoriasis.

METHODS

A steering committee generated some statements through the nominal group technique (NGT). The statements were voted by an expert panel in an adapted Delphi voting process.

RESULTS

Eighteen statements were proposed, and the majority of them (14/18) reached a consensus during the Delphi voting. The need to provide long-term proactive topical treatment to reduce the risk of relapse for the treatment of challenging diseases sites or in patients where phototherapy or systemic therapies are contraindicated/ineffective was widely recognized. A consensus was reached about the possibility to associate the proactive treatment with systemic and biological therapies, without the need for dose intensification, thus favoring a prolonged remission. Moreover, the proactive treatment was recognized as more effective than weekend therapy in increasing time free from relapses. Approaches to improve adherence, on the other hand, need further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion in guidelines of a proactive strategy among the effective treatment options will be a fundamental step in the evolution of a mild-moderate psoriasis therapeutic approach.

Outcomes of Biologic Use in Asian Compared with Non-Hispanic White Adult Psoriasis Patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data are limited comparing Asian and White patients with psoriasis using biologic therapy. This study compared the 6-month effectiveness of biologic therapy between Asian and White plaque patients with psoriasis in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

METHODS

Analyses included biologic initiations and 6-month follow-up visits from self-identified Asian (n = 293) and White (n = 2314) patients in the USA/Canada (4/2015-4/2020). Outcomes included: Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75, disease activity measures [body surface area (BSA) ≤ 1, BSA ≤ 3, PASI90, PASI100, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1], and patient-reported outcomes [Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, itch, fatigue, skin pain, EuroQoL visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), patient global assessment, Work Productivity Activity and Impairment (WPAI) domains]. Unadjusted regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for achievement of binary outcomes and difference in mean change in continuous outcomes (β, 95% CI) at 6 months, followed by adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, alcohol, smoking, health insurance, education, comorbidities, scalp psoriasis morphology, psoriatic arthritis, biologic class, previous biologics, and baseline outcome value.

RESULTS

Asians had lower proportions of women (32.8% versus 49.1%) and obesity (27.3% versus 54.5%), and higher proportions on Medicaid (19.9% versus 8.8%), graduated college (50.9% versus 40.1%) and never smoked (67.1% versus 44.1%). In unadjusted analyses, Asians had 52% higher odds of achieving PASI75 versus White patients (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.15, 2.02). After adjustment, the association was attenuated (OR 1.11; 0.81, 1.52). Secondary outcomes experienced similar patterns except for DLQI: Asians had 33% lower odds of achieving DLQI 0/1 in both the unadjusted (OR 0.67; 0.50, 0.90) and adjusted (OR 0.67; 0.49, 0.92) models.

CONCLUSION

Unadjusted differences in biologic therapy effectiveness between Asians compared with White patients were likely explained by differences in demographic, lifestyle, and psoriatic disease characteristics between groups. However, Asians still experienced lesser improvements in skin-related quality of life, even after adjustment.

Patient perceptions of psoriatic disease in Japan: Results from the Japanese subgroup of the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) survey

The population‐based Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) survey was designed to better understand patient and dermatologist perceptions of the disease burden of psoriasis (PsO) and their treatment expectations. UPLIFT was a cross‐sectional, quantitative, online survey conducted in Europe, North America, and Japan between 2 March and 3 June 2020. In Japan, 391 patients reporting a diagnosis of PsO and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were surveyed (75% had PsO alone, 23% had PsO and PsA, and 2% had PsA alone). Self‐reported body surface area (BSA) data were available for 309 Japanese patients, with the majority (80%) reporting PsO‐involved BSA ≤3 palms. Current symptoms of PsO were rated as moderate or severe by 43% of Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms, and severe by 44% of patients with BSA 4–10 palms. PsO frequently occurred in ≥1 special areas, most commonly the scalp in 76% of Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms, and ≥90% of those with BSA ≥4 palms. Furthermore, musculoskeletal symptoms in 42% of patients with PsO alone were suggestive of PsA. Whereas Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms mainly reported receiving topical therapy alone (34%) or no treatment (32%), 64% patients with BSA 4–10 palms reported receiving systemic therapy. Overall, 21% of Japanese patients with self‐perceived mild symptoms of PsO and 48% of patients with special area involvement experienced at least a moderate impact of disease on quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index score >5). Moreover, patients and dermatologists differed in their perceptions of determinants of PsO severity and treatment, and office visit discussions. In general, these findings from the Japanese subgroup of the UPLIFT survey demonstrated that a high proportion of patients perceived their symptoms to be moderate or severe irrespective of the level of skin involvement, suggesting a persistent unmet treatment need.

Moderate Psoriasis in Clinical Practice: French Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Method

INTRODUCTION

Despite the existence of multiple assessment scores for psoriasis severity, skin disease with limited skin lesions but significant impairment of quality of life can be difficult to classify, leading to under- or overtreatment. Our objective was to obtain consensus on clinical criteria to classify psoriasis severity in French clinical practice, with a focus on moderate disease, using a modified Delphi method.

METHODS

A steering committee (SC) formulated a 22-item questionnaire to classify moderate psoriasis. An independent panel of French dermatologists indicated their level of agreement for each item using a 9-point Likert scale (round 1). Items without a strong consensus were modified and included in round 2. For each item, strong consensus was defined as at least 75% of scores ≥ 7 and median score ≥ 8; good consensus was defined as at least 75% of scores ≥ 7 or median score ≥ 8.

RESULTS

Of 80 dermatologists who agreed to participate, 47 (59%) responded in round 1. All participants from round 1 responded in round 2. Fifteen (68%) items achieved strong consensus and four (18%) achieved good consensus. For psoriasis severity, several clinical dimensions assessed both by the physician (location, symptoms, temporality, previous treatments) and the patient (perception, physical and psychological impairment) obtained consensus. The following were considered sufficient to confirm that psoriasis is at least at a moderate stage: limited involvement but with an impact on patient/family quality of life; involvement of a special area; presence of uncontrolled symptoms (scaling, bleeding, pruritus, insomnia); accumulation of mild intensity symptoms; presence of burdensome onychodystrophy; failure of well-applied topical treatments. There was strong consensus that recognition of moderate psoriasis should lead to reassessment of topical treatments.

CONCLUSION

Our modified Delphi panel suggests detailed criteria to help physicians classify patients with psoriasis which is at least at a moderate stage, which could, in turn, improve treatment in these patients.

Long-term maintenance treatment of psoriasis: the role of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam in clinical practice

Most patients with psoriasis present with localized mild-to-moderate disease. In this case, the application of topical treatments in the first-line setting is recommended in most cases.Among different topical options, the fixed-dose combination of betamethasone dipropionate (BD) and vitamin D analogue (Cal) aerosol foam (Enstilar®, Leo Pharma) is approved as first-line topical therapy for the treatment of psoriasis in USA and the EU, due to its high efficacy and its favorable administration scheme.The PSO-LONG was the first trial to report on the long-term efficacy and safety of the Cal/DB foam treatment for the proactive management of psoriasis and now, the indications of Cal/BD foam included its use in the psoriasis maintenance treatment. However, the precise role of this treatment and the potential therapeutic schemes in the long-term management of psoriasis need further clarification.This Position Paper, authored by a group of Italian Expert Dermatologists, critically discusses the long-term management of psoriasis with Cal/BD foam in clinical practice. In particular, the biological rationale in the proactive treatment with Cal/BD foam and current evidence regarding this therapeutic approach are presented, along with its application also in patients with moderate-to-severe disease, difficult-to-treat lesions, or within combination regimens. In addition, strategies to improve adherence to long-term treatment of psoriasis are discussed.

Emerging paradigm shift toward proactive topical treatment of psoriasis: A narrative review

Psoriasis (PsO) requires safe and effective long‐term management to reduce the risk of recurrence and decrease the frequency of relapse. Topical PsO therapies are a cornerstone in the management of PsO though safety concerns limit the chronic, continuous use of topical corticosteroids and/or vitamin D₃ analogs. Evidence‐based guidelines on optimal treatment targets and maintenance therapy regimens are currently lacking. This review explores the evidence supporting approaches to maintenance topical therapy for PsO including continuous long‐term therapy, chronic intermittent use, step‐down therapy, sequential or pulse therapy regimens, and proactive maintenance therapy. Several unaddressed questions are discussed including how and when to transition from acute to maintenance therapy, strategies for monitoring long‐term treatment, the role of topical maintenance therapy in the context of systemic and biologic therapies, risks of maintenance therapy, prescribing a topical preparation suitable for patients' preferences and skin type, and key concepts for patient education to maximize long‐term outcomes. Overall, emerging evidence supports a paradigm shift toward proactive treatment once skin is completely clear as a strategy to enhance disease control without compromising safety.

Clinical efficacy and safety of using calcipotriol-betamethasone compounding agent for psoriasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The main objective is to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of using calcipotriol-betamethasone compounding agent for psoriasis treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and WanFang Data from inception till July 31, 2020. Efficacy was evaluated based on primary outcome indicators including skin lesion improvement and overall adverse reaction rate. Secondary outcome indicators included degree of life quality improvement, clinical effectiveness rate, and specific adverse reaction rates. RevMan5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. 22 studies finally met our inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The results indicated that for short-term treatment, a sequential therapy that uses calcipotriol betamethasone compounding agent and calcipotriol improves PASI score (MD = -0.94, 95% CI - 1.38 ~ - 0.49, P < 0.0001, I² = 49%), comparing with using only calcipotriol. From a drug safety perspective, the difference in overall adverse reaction rate is not significant between the calcipotriol group and the sequential treatment group (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 ~ 1.14, P = 0.10, I² = 33%). Calcipotriol betamethasone compounding agent may be more effective in plaque psoriasis treatment compared to use only calcipotriol, with no significant difference in adverse reaction rate between the two groups. Although the data were collected from 13 comparison groups, each group may not have sufficient data for a thorough and comprehensive analysis. Further research may be necessary for a more detailed evaluation of effectiveness of using calcipotriol betamethasone compounding agent for plaque psoriasis treatment.

Uncovering the unmet needs among psoriasis patients in the Asia-Pacific region

Studies on the psychosocial and emotional burden of psoriasis have been extensive; however, there is limited knowledge and awareness of patients’ attitude and behavior towards psoriasis treatment. To understand psoriasis patients’ attitude and behavior towards treatment of psoriasis, especially those treated with biologics, a multi‐stage study qualitative and quantitative methodology was conducted among psoriasis patients. An online survey was conducted with 45 moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients each in Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan for 20 min. This was followed by qualitative in‐depth interviews conducted among psoriasis patients in Australia (n = 3) and Japan (n = 2) for 60 min. All of the findings were workshopped with key opinion leaders and patient advisory groups to identify potential solutions addressing patients’ unmet needs. Five common insights were identified across the region, highlighting patients’ attitude and behavior towards psoriasis treatment, especially for those treated with biologics. These insights comprised the following: (i) one of the key factors driving patients’ treatment choice included their ability to enjoy clear skin for longer period (68%); (ii) bio‐maintenance patients had a higher expectation (4.9 months) of how long their skin could stay clear, compared to their pre‐biologics initiation days (2.9 months); (iii) once a good response is achieved, bio‐maintenance patients were more concerned about symptoms returning (44%) than development of side‐effects (19%); (iv) bio‐maintenance patients felt psychologically and physically affected during flare‐ups despite being on more efficacious treatment; and (v) bio‐maintenance patients still felt they were at risk of flare‐ups (4.5/7), almost similar risk perception as non‐biologics patients (4.9/7). Findings from this study showed that psoriasis patients look for treatment with the least risk of flare‐ups so that they were able to enjoy clear skin for a long time.

Systematic review and practical guidance on the use of topical calcipotriol and topical calcipotriol with betamethasone dipropionate as long-term therapy for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis

While many patients with psoriasis are candidates for topical agents, long-term treatment effects are unclear. This systematic review evaluated global findings from clinical trials and real-world studies of topical calcipotriol and the two-compound formulation of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (including scalp psoriasis). PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE were searched for relevant English-language publications along with Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Latin American publication databases. Identified articles were screened by title and abstract against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of key efficacy and safety findings from the full papers of selected publications was developed. Thirty-seven relevant papers were identified (25 English, 11 Chinese and one Japanese-language study) including 28 randomized controlled trials. While there was significant heterogeneity in study length, treatment intensity and clinical measures, following a critical review of the published data combined with expert opinion, the following clinical practice recommendations were agreed in order to assist healthcare providers: in adults, long-term treatment with calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is well tolerated and efficacious for up to 1 year on an 'as needed' basis, and for up to 16 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Calcipotriol is also well tolerated and efficacious when used long term (up to 52 weeks) 'as needed' and for up to 20 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Used on an 'as needed' basis for up to 1 year, the safety and efficacy profile of fixed-dose combination calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is more favorable than calcipotriol alone; regular consultation between patients and their dermatologist/primary care physician is required to review psoriasis symptoms and adjust treatment accordingly; a specific treatment goal should be agreed on initiation of topical agent(s) to determine when long-term treatment can begin or if a regimen change is warranted; and application frequency during the continued treatment phase should consider the patients' treatment expectations and goals.

Polyethylene Glycol Ointment Alleviates Psoriasis-Like Inflammation Through Down-Regulating the Function of Th17 Cells and MDSCs

Objective: To explore the possible mechanism of improving the imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis-like inflammation by using polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment. Methods: We evaluated the appearance of psoriasis lesions by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), observed the epidermal proliferation by histopathological staining and immunohistochemical staining, and explored the key molecules and signaling pathways of improving psoriasis-like inflammation treated with PEG ointment by RNA sequencing. Finally, we verified the expression of inflammatory cells and inflammatory factors by flow cytometry, immunohistochemical staining, and Q-PCR. Results: PEG ointment could improve the appearance of psoriasis lesions and the epidermis thickness of psoriasis mouse, inhibit the proliferation of keratinocytes, and down-regulate the relative mRNA levels of IL-23, IL-22, IL-6, IL-17C, IL-17F, S100A7, S100A8, S100A9, CXCL1, CXCL2, and IL-1β in the skin lesions of psoriasis mouse by down-regulating the numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells. Conclusion: PEG ointment could improve the IMQ-induced psoriasis-like inflammation by down-regulating the functions of Th17 cells and MDSCs.

Validation of psoriasis disability index (PDI) questionnaire Sinhala version

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with significant physical and psychological impact leading to negative influence on the quality of life among patients with psoriasis. Other than the disease characteristics many external factors could operate in South Asian context. Lack of a reliable disease-specific instrument prevents objective estimation and monitoring of disability in patients with psoriasis and hence we aim to validate assess the psychometric properties of the Sinhala version of PDI.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study conducted at dermatology clinic at a tertiary care National Hospital in Sri Lanka. Patients with psoriasis and on therapy at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment, aged more than 18 years, were included while those with already diagnosed psoriatic arthritis and/or nail psoriasis alone without any skin involvement and generalized pustular psoriasis de novo were excluded. All patients were examined by dermatologist to obtain disease characteristics. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency using Cronbach's α and item-total correlation. Convergent validity was measured with the known groups.

RESULTS

Of 199 patients studied, the PDI Sinhala version showed Cronbach's α of 0.86 (all 15 items) and ranged from 0.57 to 0.77 for subscales. PDI score and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) showed good correlation of coefficient 0.76 (p < 0.01). Positive associations were noted with extent and severity of psoriasis when using sample medians (p < 0.05). The dimensionality of the PDI was determined using exploratory factor analysis and four factors were structured.

CONCLUSION

The PDI Sinhala version is proved to be valid and reliable tool to assess the burden of psoriasis among Sinhala conversant patients in Sri Lanka.

Validation of Sinhala version of Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) occurs in one-third of patients with psoriasis and mostly remains undetected leading to debilitating deforming arthritis, eventually. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) is a quick and valid tool, widely used to detect PsA in clinical practice, and it has been validated to many languages. In this study, we intended to validate a Sinhala version of the PEST and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The Sinhala version of the questionnaire was tested on 199 patients with psoriasis attending the dermatology clinic at a tertiary care National Hospital in Sri Lanka. Patients who were detected to have PsA previously (n = 5) and those with other rheumatologic conditions (n = 12) were excluded. All patients were examined by a dermatologist, and demographic and disease characteristics were obtained. All patients were assessed by two rheumatologists who were blinded to the answers provided in the questionnaire. The diagnosis of PsA was made based on the CASPAR criteria.

RESULTS

We observed the total PEST score of 3 or more to be the best cutoff value to screen for PsA. This cutoff value showed the highest Youden index (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.95). In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve of the PEST_sv was 0.95 (SE 0.02, p < 0.001). PEST_sv total score showed a significant correlation with body surface area involved but not with Dermatology Life Quality Index or Psoriasis area and severity index score.

CONCLUSION

The Sinhala version of PEST demonstrated satisfactory performance as a screening tool for PsA. Key Points • Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most debilitating complication of psoriasis and lack of quick, valid screening tool is a limiting factor for early identification in Sri Lankan context. • Sinhala version of the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST_sv) was tested on 199 patients with psoriasis and examined for the diagnosis of PsA according to Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. • PEST_sv score of 3 or more was observed to be the best cutoff value to screen for PsA with sensitivity and specificity of 0.89 and 0.95 respectively. • PEST_sv demonstrated satisfactory performance as a screening tool for PsA.

Spotlight on Topical Long-Term Management of Plaque Psoriasis

During the 28th Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) held in Madrid in October 2019, an industry hub was dedicated to the long-term management of psoriasis. Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease primarily involving the skin that affects up to 4% of the European population, the majority of whom present with chronic plaque psoriasis. Topical therapies are well established in the first-line treatment of psoriatic plaque flares. Nevertheless, as psoriasis is a chronic disease, long-term control should be considered. The aim of the session was to provide expert opinion on the benefit of long-term maintenance therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis and introduce the concept of pro-active management to decrease the number of relapses and improve patient quality of life. The current guidelines and recommendations were reviewed, as well as the available data on published clinical trials. There is still an important role for topical therapy in psoriasis and current recommendations suggest a maintenance regimen for psoriasis. Adherence optimization and proactive management of relapse can be key factors for obtaining clinical outcomes in topical long-term therapy. Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam is the only topical formulation with long-term data as a twice-weekly proactive treatment approach for up to 52 weeks for chronic plaque psoriasis.

Interleukin-17A and Keratinocytes in Psoriasis

The excellent clinical efficacy of anti-interleukin 17A (IL-17A) biologics on psoriasis indicates a crucial pathogenic role of IL-17A in this autoinflammatory skin disease. IL-17A accelerates the proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes. Keratinocytes produce a myriad of antimicrobial peptides and chemokines, such as CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL8, and CCL20. Antimicrobial peptides enhance skin inflammation. IL-17A is capable of upregulating the production of these chemokines and antimicrobial peptides in keratinocytes. CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 recruit neutrophils and CCL20 chemoattracts IL-17A-producing CCR6⁺ immune cells, which further contributes to forming an IL-17A-rich milieu. This feed-forward pathogenic process results in characteristic histopathological features, such as epidermal hyperproliferation, intraepidermal neutrophilic microabscess, and dermal CCR6⁺ cell infiltration. In this review, we focus on IL-17A and keratinocyte interaction regarding psoriasis pathogenesis.

The CCL20 and CCR6 axis in psoriasis

Psoriasis is a TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17A-mediated inflammatory skin disease that causes a significant socioeconomic burden in afflicted patients. IL-17A-producing immune cells, including Th17 cells, are crucial effector cells in the development of psoriasis. IL-17A stimulates epidermal keratinocytes to produce CCL20, which eventually recruits CCR6 + Th17 cells into the lesional skin. Thus, the CCL20/CCR6 axis works as a driving force that prepares an IL-17A-rich cutaneous milieu. In this review, we summarize the current research topics on the CCL20/CCR6 axis and the therapeutic intervention of this axis for psoriasis.

The contribution of IL-17 to the development of autoimmunity in psoriasis

Psoriasis is an (auto)immune-mediated disease that manifests as widespread desquamative erythema. The TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17A axis is crucial to its pathogenesis, which is demonstrated by its excellent therapeutic response to biologics that target this axis. There is a strong association between HLA-C*0602 and psoriasis, and researchers have identified autoantigens that are restricted to this major histocompatibility class I molecule. These auto-Ags include LL-37, A disintegrin and metalloprotease domain containing thrombospondin type 1 motif-like 5 (ADAMTSL5), and keratin 17. IL-17A-producing T cells have been identified in T cell populations that are reactive to these auto-Ags. In addition, lipid Ags have surfaced as candidate auto-Ags that activate IL-17A-producing T cells in a CD1a-restricted manner. In this article, we review the candidate auto-Ags that may contribute to the activation of the IL-17A-deviated immune response in psoriasis.

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris: A randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial

To assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment and calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment in the treatment of mild-to-moderate patients with psoriasis vulgaris. This was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial. A total of 240 patients were randomized to receive twice-daily all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment (treatment group) or once-daily calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment (control group) for 4 weeks. The efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness were assessed at Weeks 2 and 4. After 4 weeks, both groups showed a significant clinical improvement compared to baseline (88.33% vs. 89.83%, respectively, p = .7112). But PASI 75 response in the treatment group was superior to the control group (44.12% vs. 28.57%, respectively, p = .0200), at Week 4. SSRI improvement rate in the treatment group was also superior to control group (67.11% vs. 59.43%, respectively, p = .0119) at Week 4. All-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment showed a significant clinical improvement in erythema, infiltration, and scales of skin lesions and PASI score compared to baseline. 1.67% of patients (treatment group) reported adverse reactions compared to 2.50% (control group) with no statistical significance. In addition, the cost-effectiveness assessment showed a higher cost-effectiveness of the treatment group compared to the control group in 4 weeks (199.25 vs. 801.51). All-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment was effective and safe in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris with similar efficacy as calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment and lower treatment costs.