Health-care resource use and current treatment of adult atopic dermatitis patients in Japan: A retrospective claims database analysis

Current Status of Prurigo Nodularis in Japan: A Retrospective Study Using a Health Insurance Claims Database

Background/Objectives: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is associated with considerable disease burden. Limited information exists about the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and impact of PN. This retrospective study used Japanese health insurance claims data to investigate the prevalence and incidence of PN from 2006 to 2021. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to estimate prevalence and incidence longitudinally; a cohort design was used to assess comorbidities, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Results: Over the study period, data from 297,545 to 10,081,414 individuals were available annually; in 2020, 1946 individuals were diagnosed with PN. The prevalence and incidence of PN showed little variation over the study period; in 2021, the prevalence was 41 per 100,000 persons. Although there was a tendency for a higher prevalence of PN in childhood, the prevalence and incidence were similar in other age groups and were slightly higher in females. Inflammatory skin diseases and atopic diathesis were common comorbidities. The most prescribed treatments for adults with PN were topical steroids (78%), oral antihistamines (68%), and moisturizers (54%). Oral steroids, macrolides, and psychotropics were prescribed to >10% of patients. Individuals with PN who also had atopic dermatitis (AD) received higher cumulative doses of stronger potency topical steroids, local steroid injections, and oral steroids than those without concomitant AD. Additionally, HCRU was higher in individuals with AD. Conclusions: Although patients are usually treated according to the guidelines, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments for PN due to the frequent use of intensive and late-line treatments.

Prevalence and incidence of comorbidities in patients with atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo using a Japanese claims database

Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo have been associated with comorbid conditions, including infections, malignancies, and cardiovascular diseases. This study evaluated the prevalence and incidence rates of these comorbidities in patients from Japan. This retrospective cohort study used data collected from the JMDC claims database between June 2013 and December 2020. Patients with a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, or vitiligo were matched (1:1) by age, sex, and index month with individuals with no claims records for atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, or vitiligo diagnosis. Data included 691 338, 51 988, 43 692, and 8912 patients in the atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo cohorts, respectively, and matched controls. The most prevalent comorbidities in the atopic dermatitis cohort versus matched controls included allergic rhinitis (47% vs 37%), conjunctivitis (33% vs 23%), asthma (27% vs 20%), viral infection (22% vs 15%), and acne (11% vs 3%). Incidence rates per 100 000 person-years of comorbidities in the atopic dermatitis cohort versus matched controls were: venous thromboembolism, 51.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.3-54.7) versus 31.7 (95% CI, 29.2-34.2); lymphoma, 13.8 (95% CI,12.2-15.6) versus 5.7 (95% CI, 4.7-6.8); cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.2) versus 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4); and herpes zoster, 740.9 (95% CI, 728.8-753.1) versus 397.6 (95% CI, 388.9-406.6). Similar trends were observed in the psoriasis versus nonpsoriasis cohorts, with 95% CIs mostly overlapping for alopecia areata and vitiligo cohorts versus controls. Overall, patients from Japan with dermatologic diseases have a higher prevalence and incidence of certain health conditions, particularly venous thromboembolism, lymphoma, and infections in patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, compared with individuals without these dermatologic diseases.

English version of clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2024

This is the English version of the 2024 clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. A crucial aspect of AD treatment is the prompt induction of remission via the suppression of existing skin inflammation and pruritus. To achieve this, topical anti-inflammatory drugs, such as topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, delgocitinib ointment, and difamilast ointment, have been used. However, the following treatments should be considered in addition to topical therapy for patients with refractory moderate-to-severe AD: oral cyclosporine, subcutaneous injections of biologics (dupilumab, nemolizumab, tralokinumab), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, abrocitinib), and phototherapy. In these revised guidelines, descriptions of five new drugs, namely, difamilast, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Difamilast 1% for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adult Japanese Patients

INTRODUCTION

Difamilast has proven to be an effective treatment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japan, but its cost-effectiveness remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD and compared with placebo in Japanese adult patients with all-severity AD from a Japanese public health-care perspective.

METHODS

The analysis was conducted using a cost-effectiveness model from the Japanese public health-care perspective. This model had four health states ("clear," "mild," "moderate," and "severe") defined according to the Eczema Area and Severity Index score. The time horizon of the analysis was 1 year. Because the analysis period was short, no discount rate was applied. The proportions of patients previously estimated by the anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison were implemented in the model. The model was further populated with data from the literature. The main model outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), costs, and outcomes, including the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. All prices were stated in JPY at the price level from 2018 April to 2019 March. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

In the base case, the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% and placebo was JPY 827,054/QALY and JPY 1,518,657/QALY, respectively. The PSA showed that the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% and placebo had a 66.6% and 99.6% probability of being below the JPY 5 million/QALY threshold, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that difamilast 1% is a more cost-effective treatment option compared with delgocitinib 0.5% in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD and compared with placebo in adult patients with all-severity AD from a Japanese public health-care perspective.

Atopic Dermatitis-Related Problems in Daily Life, Goals of Therapy and Deciding Factors for Systemic Therapy: A Review

Background/Objectives/Methods: Atopic dermatitis (AD) impacts various aspects of patients' lives including personal life, psychological aspects/disturbances (e.g., depression, anxiety, or even suicidal thoughts), school, and work-related activities, including career advancement. The aim of this narrative review is to present the latest information available on how to best approach AD patient management, as well as decisions regarding standard/advanced systemic therapy, by gathering evidence from the relevant medical literature (PubMed and other prominent medical databases). Results: Thus, AD patient management and decisions regarding advanced/systemic therapy are complex, requiring the consideration of multiple disease-related factors: age; disease severity; patient medical history and comorbidities; previous topical therapy use and any adverse reactions; treatment efficacy concerns; patient preferences, expectations and fears; pregnancy planning; ability and willingness to adhere to the treatment regimen; impact on related risks; and any associated psychological or psychiatric issues. Current guidelines and systematic reviews support the safety and efficacy of systemic therapy including conventional drugs (cyclosporine, methotrexate, and azathioprine), biologics (dupilumab and tralokinumab), and JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib) recommended for treating moderate and severe AD. Recently, additional biologics have been evaluated in clinical trials, including lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, eblasakimab, and OX40/OX40L, among others. Conclusions: The most recently suggested approach to treating AD patients suggests focusing on therapy that targets and achieves minimal disease activity (MDA), where therapy decisions are informed by both the patient and the clinician. Available data also indicate the importance of a personalized, stepwise, and multidisciplinary approach. This type of approach promotes patient compliance, satisfaction with therapy, and increased engagement, which all lead to better patient outcomes.

Pruritus and Pain Constitute the Main Negative Impact of Atopic Dermatitis® From the Patient's Perspective: A Systematic Review

Atopic Dermatitis® (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itching and highly visible signs, representing a great burden to the patient. Despite its straightforward diagnosis, AD severity and burden can be underestimated in routine clinical practice. This review aims to determine the impact of AD on patients' lives, establish which domains of life are most affected, and identify symptom drivers of AD burden. A systematic literature review was conducted in Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus following Cochrane and PRISMA recommendations. Observational studies published in English or Spanish between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022, evaluating the impact of AD and its symptoms from the patient's perspective, were included. Reviewed studies were assessed for quality following the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology Checklist. A total of 28 observational studies evaluating the impact of AD and its symptoms from the patient's perspective were included in the review. All domains of the AD patient's life were found to be greatly affected, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), emotional health, sleep disorders, work impairment, health care resource utilization, cognitive function, and development of comorbidities. The more severe the disease, the greater the impact, worsening in patients with moderate and severe AD. Pruritus and pain are reported to be the disease symptoms with the greatest impact. In conclusion, AD impacts several domains of patients' lives, especially HRQoL and mental health. Pruritus and pain are identified as the main drivers of AD impact, suggesting that optimal symptom control may reduce the burden and improve disease management.

Epidemiology and healthcare resource utilization in atopic dermatitis in Colombia: A retrospective analysis of data from the National Health Registry from 2015 to 2020

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis, also known as eczema or atopic eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by the presence of pruritus accompanied by itching. In Colombia, epidemiological and healthcare resource utilization information regarding this pathology is limited. Objective: To describe atopic dermatitis epidemiological characteristics and healthcare resource utilization patterns in Colombia. Material and methods: A retrospective database study using real-world data obtained from the national claims database SISPRO (Sistema de Información para la Protección Social) for the 2015-2020 period was carried out. Sociodemographic (age, and health services delivery), epidemiological (incidence, prevalence, and comorbidities), and healthcare resource utilization data were extracted from the SISPRO database. Results: The epidemiological results showed increased incidence and prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Colombia in the 2018-2019 period compared to 2015-2017. Accordingly, the number of medical consultations (particularly with specialists), the number of procedures, and the number of hospitalizations of patients with atopic dermatitis increased. Topic and systemic corticoids were the most frequently prescribed drugs. Conclusions: Diagnoses of atopic dermatitis in Colombia increased with a concomitant increase in healthcare resource utilization during 2015-2020, which was possibly slowed down by the arrival of the Covid-19. This study may help physicians gaining a better understanding of the disease, improving atopic dermatitis patient management.

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs of Targeted Therapy-Eligible Atopic Dermatitis Patients in Taiwan-A Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis to understand the patient profile, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and cost of atopic dermatitis (AD) of patients eligible for targeted therapy in Taiwan.

METHODS

A retrospective, claims-based analysis was undertaken using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 01 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. Patients aged ≥ 2 years and with at least one diagnosis code for AD during 2015 were identified. Patients with comorbid autoimmune diseases were excluded. Enrolled AD patients were categorized using claims-based treatment algorithms by disease severity and their eligibility for targeted therapy treatment. A cohort of targeted therapy-eligible patients was formed, and a matched cohort using patients not eligible for targeted therapy was derived using propensity score matching based on age, gender, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs were measured during a 1-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 377,423 patients with AD were identified for this study. Most patients had mild AD (84.5%; n = 318,830) with 11.9% (n = 45,035) having moderate AD, and 3.6% (n = 13,558) having severe AD. Within the 58,593 moderate-to-severe AD patients, 1.5% (n = 897) were included in the targeted therapy-eligible cohort. The matched cohort consisted of 3558 patients. During the 1-year follow-up period, targeted therapy-eligible patients utilized antihistamines (85.5%), topical treatments (80.8%), and systemic anti-inflammatories (91.6%) including systemic corticosteroids (51.4%) and azathioprine (59.1%). During the first year of follow-up, targeted therapy-eligible patients (70.5%; 7.01 [SD = 8.84] visits) had higher resource utilization rates and frequency of AD-related outpatient visits compared with the matched cohort (40.80%; 1.85 [SD = 4.71] visits). Average all-cause direct costs during 1-year follow-up were $2850 (SD = 3629) and $1841 (SD = 6434) for the eligible targeted therapy and matched cohorts, respectively. AD-related costs were 17.7% ($506) of total costs for the targeted therapy eligible cohort and 2.2% ($41) for the matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

AD patients eligible for targeted therapy in Taiwan experienced high resource and economic burden compared with their non-targeted-therapy-eligible counterparts.

Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Adolescents: a Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Although previously regarded as a children's disease, it is clear that atopic dermatitis (AD) is also highly prevalent in adults. Because AD is not associated with mortality, it is usually neglected compared with other, fatal diseases. However, several studies have highlighted that AD burden is significant due to its substantial humanistic burden and psychosocial effects. This study aims to summarize and quantify the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of AD in adults and adolescents.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), EconPapers, The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Studies were included if they reported clinical, economic, or humanistic effects of AD on adults or adolescents, from January 2011 to December 2020. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias for the included studies. Regression models were used to explain the correlation between factors such as disease severity and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Among 3400 identified records, 233 studies were included. Itch, depression, sleep disturbance, and anxiety were the most frequently reported parameters related to the clinical and humanistic burden of AD. The average utility value in studies not stratifying patients by severity was 0.779. The average direct cost of AD was 4411 USD, while the average indirect cost was 9068 USD annually.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of AD is significant. The hidden disease burden is reflected in its high indirect costs and the psychological effect on QoL. The magnitude of the burden is affected by the severity level. The main limitation of this study is the heterogeneity of different studies in terms of data reporting, which led to the exclusion of potentially relevant data points from the summary statistics.

The Symptom Characteristics and the Efficacy of Combining Therapies in Inpatients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Study on Vietnamese Population

Background:  Currently, biologics and targeted disease-modifying therapies were developed to provide an effective control for adult with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. This study aimed to describe clinical features, stages, and severity levels of the disease as well as to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the combining therapies in adults with atopic dermatitis. Methods: 128 patients with atopic dermatitis diagnosis based on the Rajka and Hanifi standards at the Inpatient Department of Can Tho Dermato-Venereology Hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were recruited in this study. The clinical characteristics were recorded. The treatment response was evaluated through the improvement of clinical presentations and the altering SCORAD score.   Results: The study showed that people aged 60 and over made up the largest proportion of total investigated patients. Pruritus was the predominant symptom of atopic dermatitis. There was an association between xerosis symptom and disease severity. After two weeks of treatment, the mean of SCORAD score significantly decreased by more than halved. Additionally, 88.4% of patients showed an excellent response and there was no patient with non/poor improvement. Conclusions: Our study supports that the combination of therapeutic methods might reduce symptoms in atopic dermatitis patients, and thereby improving their quality of life.

English Version of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021

This is the English version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. In Japan, from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, the current strategies for the treatment of AD consist of three primary measures: (i) use of topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, and delgocitinib ointment as the main treatment of the inflammation; (ii) topical application of emollients to treat the cutaneous barrier dysfunction; and (iii) avoidance of apparent exacerbating factors, psychological counseling, and advice about daily life. In the present revised guidelines, descriptions of three new drugs, namely, dupilumab, delgocitinib, and baricitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Impact of itch and skin pain on quality of life in adult patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan: results from a real-world, point-in-time, survey of physicians and patients

OBJECTIVE

Itch is a common symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), however, there is limited evidence of the frequency and association of skin pain alongside itch. This study assessed the incremental dual burden and impact of itch and skin pain on satisfaction, quality of life and work productivity in patients with AD in Japan.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the 2020 Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists (n = 56) and their patients with history of moderate/severe AD (n = 265). Patients were grouped accordingly: no itch/skin pain (No I/SP, reference group, n = 89), itch/no skin pain (I-only, n = 71), and itch and skin pain (I + SP, n = 26). Descriptive analyses were performed alongside a range of regression models, dependent on outcome variables.

RESULTS

I + SP patients had a 4.97-point worse POEM score (p = .005) and 14.5% more overall work impairment (p = .034) versus the reference group. I-only and I + SP patients were 8.92 and 23.5 times more likely, respectively, to experience sleep disruption on a day-to-day basis (both p < .001). I + SP patients were 4.6 times more likely to be bothered by their symptoms (p = .034), had a mean EASI score 6.7 points higher (p = .008) and had 1.39 more areas affected (p = .001). I + SP patients were 7.26 times more likely to express dissatisfaction with lack of improvement in their condition and 8 times more likely to be dissatisfied with convenience of treatment (both p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This dissatisfaction, alongside variations in reported symptomatic burdens, suggests that physicians could consider alternative and/or novel therapeutic approaches for the management of both itch and skin pain.

Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using German Health Claims Data

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease. Many patients are initiating a systemic therapy, if the disease is not adequately controlled with topical treatment only. Currently, there is little real-world evidence on the AD-related medical care situation in Germany. This study analyzed patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with systemically treated AD for the German healthcare system.

Methods

In this descriptive, retrospective cohort study, aggregated anonymized German health claims data from the InGef research database were used. Within a representative sample of four million insured individuals, patients with AD and systemic drug therapy initiation (SDTI) in the index year 2017 were identified and included into the study cohort. Systemic drug therapy included dupilumab, systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and systemic immunosuppressants (SIS). Patients were observed for one year starting from the date of SDTI in 2017.

Results

9975 patients were included (57.8% female, mean age 39.6 years [SD 25.5]). In the one-year observation period, the most common systemic drug therapy was SCS (> 99.0%). Administrations of dupilumab (0.3%) or dispensations of SIS were rare (cyclosporine: 0.5%, azathioprine: 0.6%, methotrexate: 0.1%). Median treatment duration of SCS, cyclosporine and azathioprine was 27 days, 102 days, and 109 days, respectively. 2.8% of the patients received phototherapy; 41.6% used topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor. Average annual costs for medications amounted to € 1237 per patient. Outpatient services were used by 99.6% with associated mean annual costs of € 943; 25.4% had at least one hospitalization (mean annual costs: € 5836). 5.3% of adult patients received sickness benefits with associated mean annual costs of € 5026.

Conclusions

Despite unfavorable risk–benefit profile, this study demonstrated a common treatment with SCS, whereas other systemic drug therapy options were rarely used. Furthermore, the results suggest a substantial economic burden for patients with AD and SDTI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00773-3.

Prescription Market Share and Treatment Patterns in Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Observational Study Using US Insurance Claims

INTRODUCTION

There is limited real-world evidence on the treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) since dupilumab was approved in 2017. The objective of this study was to assess market share of drugs commonly prescribed for the treatment of AD and describe treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with AD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study in adult patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of AD between 2017 and 2019 using insurance claims data in the US population.

RESULTS

Market share cohorts consisted of 75,794 (2017) and 89,618 (2018) patients. Treatment patterns cohort had 68,588 patients with 63.56% female, mean (SD) age 43.54 (15.96) years, and mean (SD) Quan CCI 0.31 (0.85). Topicals had two-thirds market share by prescription volume (2017 = 65.56%; 2018 = 63.63%). Corticosteroids were the most prescribed topical (2017 = 71.94%; 2018 = 72.04%) and systemic (2017 = 30.59%; 2018 = 30.23%) drug class. Dupilumab had the highest medication adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%; 60.74%) and persistence (17.39%), lowest discontinuation rate (23.32%), and longest mean (SD) days on therapy 148.20 (101.77).

CONCLUSION

Topicals are the primary treatment for patients with AD, even though systemic users have higher medication adherence (PDC). Systemics provide a treatment alternative to topicals.

Drug Utilization and Medical Cost Study Focusing on Moisturizers in Cancer Patients Treated with Molecular Targeted Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Data from a Japanese Claims Database

Introduction

Molecular targeted therapies (MTTs) cause skin disorders in patients with cancer, and moisturizers are useful treatments; however, their actual use and costs are unknown. Our purpose was to examine the use and costs of moisturizers prescribed for xerosis (asteatosis) in patients with cancer treated with MTTs.

Methods

We used data from a Japanese hospital-based claims database. The index date was the first date of MTT prescription from October 2011 to April 2018 (selection period), and the follow-up period was 1 year from the index date. Patients treated with MTTs during the selection period and who were not prescribed moisturizers in the 6 months before the index date were included as the study cohort. Timing, duration, amount, and costs of the prescribed moisturizers and total medical costs were analyzed.

Results

Among the 78,190 patients in the study cohort, 27,906 patients (35.7%) were prescribed moisturizers during follow-up. Moisturizer prescription timing, duration, and volume were inconsistent. The average annual total medical costs for treating patients with MTT who were prescribed moisturizers was JPY 6.165 million (USD 53,797) per patient, and the moisturizer costs were JPY 6033 (USD 53). The number of patients who used moisturizers showed an increasing trend.

Conclusion

No consistent patterns were observed for the timing or duration of moisturizer use, which suggests various developmental patterns of skin disorders. Furthermore, medical costs for moisturizers accounted for only a small proportion of the total medical costs required for cancer treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00712-2.

A Real-World Data Study on the Healthcare Resource Use for Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Secondary Care in the United Kingdom Prior to the Introduction of Biologic Treatment

Background

Whilst there is international evidence around the high healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with atopic dermatitis (AD), there is a lack of published data from the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods

A retrospective, descriptive, observational study was conducted to evaluate the burden of moderate-to-severe AD on the National Health Service (NHS) in an adult UK population treated with traditional standard of care prior to the introduction of biologics. Patients (n=59) were recruited from 6 UK NHS Hospital Trusts and observed over three years.

Results

707 dermatology clinic visits were recorded over the observation period, amounting to 6.6 visits per patient-year, most commonly for routine check-ups most of which involved dermatology consultants (n=469, 66%). Physicians were the most consulted healthcare professional (n=652, 92%); emollients were the most common treatment (n=80 courses). 174 flares requiring additional medical advice were recorded in total (1.6 per patient-year).

Discussion/Conclusions

Complex treatment pathways for adult patients in the UK with moderate-to-severe AD incur considerable HRU, particularly for those patients non-responsive to systemic therapies with broad immunosuppressant action. Recent advances in biologics-based AD management could possibly have a significant positive impact on HRU through significant reduction in the number of NHS touch points identified in this study.

Impact of Depression Onset and Treatment on the Trend of Annual Medical Costs in Japan: An Exploratory, Descriptive Analysis of Employer-Based Health Insurance Claims Data

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to clarify medical expenses in Japanese individuals before and after major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis, and to determine whether MDD treatment also reduces medical costs for comorbid physical conditions.

METHODS

This was an exploratory, descriptive, retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from JMDC Inc. Cohort A included individuals aged 18-64 years between January 2015 and December 2019. Cohorts B and C included Cohort A individuals with diabetes/hypertension ('chronic disease'), and sleep/anxiety disorders ('high depression risk'), respectively. Individuals in Cohorts A-C with an MDD diagnosis were analyzed by year of MDD onset (Cohorts A-C_MDD2015-2019). Diagnoses and median medical costs were derived from International Classification of Diseases 10 codes.

RESULTS

Total medical and non-neuropsychiatric drug costs in MDD onset years were 170,390-182,120 and 8480-9586 yen higher, respectively, for Cohorts A_MDD2015-2019 than for Cohort A. In Cohort A_MDD2019, total medical and non-neuropsychiatric drug costs increased incrementally from 2015 to 2019 (total changes: + 165,130 and + 7365 yen, respectively), to a greater degree than in Cohort A (+ 10,510 and + 1246 yen, respectively). Neuropsychiatric drug costs increased in the year of MDD onset only and decreased thereafter. After MDD onset, decreases in total medical and non-neuropsychiatric drug costs were observed (Cohorts A_MDD2015-2019). Non-neuropsychiatric drug costs also decreased after MDD onset in the chronic disease groups (Cohorts C_MDD2015-2019), but not in patients with MDD recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Treating MDD reduces medical costs for comorbid physical conditions and may be a useful strategy for improving healthcare efficiency in Japan.

Context and Considerations for Use of Two Japanese Real-World Databases in Japan: Medical Data Vision and Japanese Medical Data Center

In Japan, an increasing interest in real-world evidence for hypothesis generation and decision-making has emerged in order to overcome limitations and restrictions of clinical trials. We sought to characterize the context and concrete considerations of when to use Medical Data Vision (MDV) and JMDC databases, the main Japanese real-world data (RWD) sources accessible by pharmaceutical companies. Use cases for these databases, and related issues and considerations, were identified and summarized based on a literature search and experience-based knowledge. Studies conducted using MDV or JMDC were mostly descriptive in nature, or explored potential risk factors by evaluating associations with a target outcome. Considerations such as variable ascertainment at different time points, including issues relating to treatment identification and missing data, were highlighted for these two databases. Although several issues were commonly shared (e.g., only month of event occurrence reported), some database-specific issues were also identified and need to be accounted for. In conclusion, MDV and JMDC present limitations that are relatively typical of RWD sources, though some of them are unique to Japan, such as the identification of event occurrence and the inability to track patients visiting different healthcare settings. Addressing study design and careful result interpretation with respect to the specificities and uniqueness of the Japanese healthcare system is of particular importance. This aspect is especially relevant with respect to the growing global interest of conducting RWD studies in Japan.

Real-World Prescription Pattern and Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis

Introduction

The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing in Japan but recent disease burden estimates are unavailable. This study was conducted to explore the prescription pattern and to estimate the economic burden in Japanese patients with UC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2018 using healthcare claims data from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database. Patients with a UC diagnosis before the index date (the first UC treatment claim) or within 6 months after the index date, a UC treatment claim registered within ≥ 6 months during the selection period, and a continuous enrollment for 6 months pre-index and 12 months follow-up period were included in the study. Prescription pattern was analyzed by calendar years and lines of treatment (LoT). Healthcare resource utilization and cost per month were determined by LoTs.

Results

Among 10,337 patients with UC diagnosis, 1,861 (18.0%) met the eligibility criteria for this study. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was the most used treatment over the study period and across all LoTs. 5-ASA was also the most prescribed treatment (88.7%) across all the first LoTs, followed by steroids (20.4%). Use of biologics increased over the study period (biologics + 5-ASA: 0.0% in 2009 to 3.0% in 2018). Biologics were most used as the sixth LoT (7.1%, biologics + 5-ASA; 7.1%, biologics + 5-ASA + steroids). Mean total cost per month was JPY 52,782, with the highest (JPY 112,997) total healthcare cost per month in the fourth LoT and the lowest in the first LoT (JPY 56,782).

Conclusion

Prescription pattern in Japanese patients with UC enrolled in the JMDC database were largely consistent with the clinical guidelines in Japan. UC puts a substantial economic burden on patients, and an effective treatment is warranted to reduce the UC disease burden.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01615-4.

Evaluating the burden of pruritus due to atopic dermatitis in Japan by patient-reported outcomes

AIMS

Although pruritus is a hallmark feature of atopic dermatitis, no study has investigated the associated impact of pruritus, due to atopic dermatitis in Japan. The study aimed to evaluate the real-life burden of atopic dermatitis by pruritus severity in adult Japanese patients. The primary objective was to assess the correlation between pruritus severity and work productivity and activity impairment. A secondary objective was to characterize the impact of pruritus on quality of life and to evaluate the burden of symptoms severity and frequency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional internet-based survey was conducted. Eligible patients were currently employed and working adults with atopic dermatitis for at least 6 months. Stratification on pruritus severity assessed by the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at the screening was performed to ensure that different severity groups are represented. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of pruritus severity on work productivity and quality of life.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 370 patients. Pruritus severity significantly correlated with work impairment (Rho = 0.622, P value (H0: Rho > 0.5) <.001). A greater pruritus severity was associated with greater work productivity and activity impairment and a greater impact on quality of life, sleep, emotional state, and everyday activities. Patients with a greater pruritus severity carried a higher economic burden of treatment and were more often not satisfied with the received therapy.

LIMITATIONS

All data were self-reported by patients via an online survey, which is associated with the risk of misclassification for diagnosis, recall bias, and limited participation of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence that pruritus is associated with the overall disease burden and impacts many important life aspects of patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan.

Regulation of Filaggrin, Loricrin, and Involucrin by IL-4, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-22, AHR, and NRF2: Pathogenic Implications in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an eczematous, pruritic skin disorder with extensive barrier dysfunction and elevated interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signatures. The barrier dysfunction correlates with the downregulation of barrier-related molecules such as filaggrin (FLG), loricrin (LOR), and involucrin (IVL). IL-4 and IL-13 potently inhibit the expression of these molecules by activating signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)6 and STAT3. In addition to IL-4 and IL-13, IL-22 and IL-17A are probably involved in the barrier dysfunction by inhibiting the expression of these barrier-related molecules. In contrast, natural or medicinal ligands for aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) are potent upregulators of FLG, LOR, and IVL expression. As IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, and IL-17A are all capable of inducing oxidative stress, antioxidative AHR agonists such as coal tar, glyteer, and tapinarof exert particular therapeutic efficacy for AD. These antioxidative AHR ligands are known to activate an antioxidative transcription factor, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (NRF2). This article focuses on the mechanisms by which FLG, LOR, and IVL expression is regulated by IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, and IL-17A. The author also summarizes how AHR and NRF2 dual activators exert their beneficial effects in the treatment of AD.

Cost of illness study for adult atopic dermatitis in Japan: A cross-sectional Web-based survey

Atopic dermatitis is a pruritic, eczematous dermatitis, the symptoms of which chronically fluctuate with remissions and relapses. Although a high psychosomatic and economic burden caused by atopic dermatitis is expected, few studies have been conducted estimating the cost of illness, including the self-medication costs and productivity loss due to atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional, Web-based survey of the direct medical costs, self-medication costs and productivity loss for adult atopic dermatitis patients, and estimate the burden of Japanese adult atopic dermatitis patients by disease severity. In a physician survey, the medical resource consumption related to medical treatments was surveyed by disease severity. The direct medical costs were calculated by multiplying the medical resource consumption and medical fee corresponding to each treatment. Based on the results of a patient survey, the self-medication costs and productivity loss were estimated by sex and disease severity. Atopic dermatitis-related productivity loss was calculated based on absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment for employed workers and activity impairment for housewives. The nationwide estimations were calculated based on the estimated number of atopic dermatitis patients, employed workers with atopic dermatitis, and housewives with atopic dermatitis in their 20s-50s in Japan. Based on the surveys, all costs per patient and the scores increased with disease severity. The cost of illness for adult atopic dermatitis patients in Japan was estimated to be approximately JPY 3 trillion/year. Considering the physical and mental burdens, the burden of illness for adult atopic dermatitis was demonstrated to be vast.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)/AHR-nuclear translocator (ARNT) system is a sensitive sensor for small molecular, xenobiotic chemicals of exogenous and endogenous origin, including dioxins, phytochemicals, microbial bioproducts, and tryptophan photoproducts. AHR/ARNT are abundantly expressed in the skin. Once activated, the AHR/ARNT axis strengthens skin barrier functions and accelerates epidermal terminal differentiation by upregulating filaggrin expression. In addition, AHR activation induces oxidative stress. However, some AHR ligands simultaneously activate the nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (NRF2) transcription factor, which is a master switch of antioxidative enzymes that neutralizes oxidative stress. The immunoregulatory system governing T-helper 17/22 (Th17/22) and T regulatory cells (Treg) is also regulated by the AHR system. Notably, AHR agonists, such as tapinarof, are currently used as therapeutic agents in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. In this review, we summarize recent topics on AHR related to atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.