Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue

Research trends and hotspots in biologics for plaque psoriasis: A bibliometric study from 2004 to 2023

Background and objective

Biologics have revolutionized the management of plaque psoriasis and are flourishing. We aimed to construct a knowledge structure in this field through bibliometrics, analyze research trends and cutting-edge hotspots to inspire future research directions, and provide valuable references for clinical decisions.

Methods

Publications on biologics for plaque psoriasis in the Web of Science database core collection from 2004 to 2023 were searched. Bibliometric analysis and scientific knowledge mapping were performed with R, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software.

Results

2,672 articles written by 9,474 authors from 67 countries were included in the study. The number of annual publications has steadily increased over the last 20 years. The most prolific countries, institutions, and authors were the United States, Novartis, and Prof. Reick K., respectively. Reference analysis categorized the research base of the field into 10 main clusters. "Efficacy" and "safety" were the most frequent keywords, and cluster analysis categorized the research in this area into four groups. Burst detection captured current hot keywords including interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, "drug survival," "discontinuation," "Covid-19," "real-world," and "clinical features."

Conclusion

Global publications on biologics research in plaque psoriasis have grown steadily and rapidly over the past two decades. Efficacy and safety are the highest topics of concern for researchers, and IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, real-world studies, efficacy prediction, and retreatment after biologics failure or discontinuation are current research hotspots.

Combination biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in the treatment of spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

The advent of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) have transformed the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases, including spondylarthritis (SpA). However, the data about combining b/ts DMARDs in the treatment of SpA are scarce. The study objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARD in SpA.

METHODS

We conducted systematic literature review (PubMed and Medline) with two independent reviewers, one adjudicator, exploring the efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARDs in the treatment of SpA. Inclusion criteria were studies published in last 20 years, English language, interventions included use of two b/tsDMARDs, and minimal three-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Out of 1936 initial hits, 28 manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two were randomized controlled trials, and the remaining were retrospective cohort studies or case series. Combination of apremilast with bDMARD, or TNF inhibitor plus IL12/23 inhibitor were the commonest and reported good efficacy with no increased safety signal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough data to fully evaluate efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARDs in SpA treatment. Limited information shows apremilast plus bDMARD, or TNF inhibitor plus IL12/23 inhibitor combination to be efficacious and safe. Randomized controlled trials and larger cohort with a longer follow-up are required.

Rationale, current state and opportunities in combining biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

The advent of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has considerably improved patient outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. However, not all patients reach the state of remission, as disease can be resistant even to single cytokine inhibition by bDMARDs. Simultaneous or sequential inhibition of multiple cytokines may be considered in situations where disease control is not adequate under singular inhibition of cytokines. Although there have been some disappointing experiences in the past with combination of bDMARDs, the ongoing improvement of our understanding about inflammatory pathways and the overall better safety understanding of bDMARDs seem to make new biologic treatment combinations possible. This review covers the rationale and current evidence for bDMARDs combination in inflammatory arthritis.

Trends in prescriptions of oral medications for psoriasis: A single-center retrospective study

The systemic treatment of psoriasis has changed markedly with the introduction of many novel drugs. However, clinicians have had limited opportunities to evaluate these new therapies. One of the new drugs, apremilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor), was approved in 2017 in Japan. We previously reported oral treatment for psoriasis before the introduction of apremilast. In this study, we investigated the impact of apremilast on oral medication for psoriasis by comparing data obtained before and after apremilast became available. This retrospective study enrolled patients who visited the Department of Dermatology, Fukuoka University Hospital, who were diagnosed with psoriasis and treated with anti-psoriatic oral medications. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, who first visited our clinic between January 2010 and March 2016; and Group 2, who first visited our clinic between April 2016 and March 2022. The information collected included patient demographics, drug use (apremilast, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and etretinate), and treatment duration. In Group 1 (n = 149 patients), cyclosporine, methotrexate, and etretinate were prescribed to 59.1%, 16.6%, and 24.3% of the patients, respectively. In Group 2 (n = 129 patients), apremilast was prescribed to 52.5% of patients, while the number of prescriptions for cyclosporine and etretinate had decreased to 17.1% and 8.3%, respectively. The number of methotrexate prescriptions did not change significantly. Apremilast, methotrexate, and etretinate had longer continuation rates than cyclosporine in Group 2. In conclusion, apremilast replaced cyclosporine and etretinate mainly because of its better safety profile, whereas methotrexate remained in constant demand in both eras. New oral treatments for psoriasis, such as tyrosine kinase-2 inhibitors, are now in the pipeline, and our data will serve as a control for oral anti-psoriatic medicine before the coming era.

Combination Therapy with Apremilast and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The evidence for adding small-molecule drugs to an ongoing biologic treatment is sparse, but combination therapies appear to be advantageous in appropriately selected patients with psoriasis. To our knowledge, efficacy and safety of combination therapy with apremilast and biologics has not previously been reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of psoriasis, age ≥ 18 years, concomitant treatment with apremilast and a specified biologic agent, and available safety and/or efficacy results. All papers written in English and published from database inception to August 2021 were included. No limit was set regarding study size.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 447 citations. Of these, 19 studies published from 2015 to 2020 were included in the review. All papers referred to retrospective studies, comprising case reports (n = 9), case series (n = 8), or cohort studies (n = 2). A total of 172 patients with psoriasis were identified. Clinical subtypes included plaque psoriasis (n = 164), palmoplantar pustulosis (n = 7), and acute pustular psoriasis (n = 1). The observation period ranged from 3 weeks to 24 months. Geographical origin of studies was North America (n = 11), Europe (n = 4), and Asia (n = 4). In general, apremilast-biologic combination therapy was reported to be safe; across papers, one serious adverse event was registered (hospitalization due to weight loss). Adverse events (AEs) were otherwise mostly mild and gastrointestinal. No differences in AEs were observed in studies comparing apremilast mono- and combination therapy. In several papers, sufficient information about AEs was not reported or could not be extracted. Clinical response to combination treatment was evaluated at various time points, and only few studies used validated scores. In the remaining papers, efficacy data were descriptive and/or in photographic form, or not available. In total, two patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for combined treatment with apremilast and biologics is limited and restricted to retrospective studies of various quality. Based on available data, apremilast may constitute an efficacious and safe add-on treatment to biologic therapy, but properly conducted clinical investigations are needed.

Systematic Review and Recommendations to Combine Newer Therapies With Conventional Therapy in Psoriatic Disease

Background: Psoriasis continues to have unmet needs in its management despite introduction of newer molecules. Monotherapy with these newer agents may not achieve therapeutic goals in all cases, hence necessitating their combinations with other molecules. Improved understanding of newer as well as conventional treatment modalities and experiences in their combinations hence necessitates therapeutic guidelines for their use in psoriasis. Objective: To review the combinations of treatments reported in literature and recommendations for their use based on best current evidence in literature. Methods: A literature review of MEDLINE database for studies evaluating combinations of newer therapies with conventional therapies in psoriasis was done. Newer therapies were identified as biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs and other molecules such as apremilast while conventional therapies included methotrexate, cyclosporine, or retinoids, phototherapy and others. The therapeutic guidelines are proposed with the aim to provide evidenced based approach to combine newer and conventional agents in day-to-day psoriasis management. Findings: Combination of acitretin and narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB)/Psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) achieves faster clearance and allows reduction of dose of the latter. A variable outcome is reported of methotrexate with TNF-α inhibitors vs. TNF-α inhibitors alone, although addition of methotrexate appears to reduce immunogenicity of TNF-α inhibitors thereby preventing formation of anti-drug antibodies especially in case of infliximab. While combination of acitretin and PUVA is beneficial, combining TNF-α inhibitors and phototherapy too produces better and faster results but long term risks of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers (NMSCs) may preclude their use together. Combination of cyclosporine and phototherapy is not recommended due to greater chances of NMSCs. Adding phototherapy to Fumaric Acid Esters (FAEs) improves efficacy. Apremilast can be safely combined with available biologic agents in patients with plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis not responding adequately to biologics alone. Hydroxyurea and acitretin may be used together increasing their efficacy and reducing doses of both and hence their adverse effects. Conclusion: Selected clinical scenarios shall benefit from combinations therapies, improving efficacy of both conventional and newer agents and at the same time helping reduce toxicity of higher dosages when used individually.

Apremilast improves quality of life and ultrasonography parameters in patients with nail psoriasis: A prospective cohort study

Specific studies on apremilast for nail psoriasis are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate the nail-specific patient-reported outcomes, clinical efficacy, ultrasound (US) parameters, and safety of apremilast for nail psoriasis. We conducted a prospective cohort study including adult patients with plaque and nail psoriasis with a fingernail Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score of 12 or more. Patients were treated with apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. for 52 weeks. Forty-five patients were included. At week 52, the Nail Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (NAPPA) Patient Benefit Index global weighted score was 2 or more in 52% of patients and NAPPA Quality of Life and fingernail NAPSI improved by 57% and 53%, respectively. US parameters improved from week 16 onwards. Target nail NAPSI improvements were higher for nail matrix scores (60%) than for nail bed scores (38%, p < 0.001). Baseline target nail bed NAPSI was associated with not achieving a target nail 50% reduction in NAPSI score at week 52 in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.024). Safety was consistent with the known apremilast profile. Results from apremilast therapy for 52 weeks in patients with psoriasis and predominant nail disease show significant improvements in nail-specific quality of life, clinical signs, and structural restoration on US, suggesting that apremilast may be considered in the treatment of nail psoriasis.