Tixagevimab/cilgavimab for the prevention of COVID-19 in vaccine-refractory patients with autoimmune diseases: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of passive immunization with the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab/cilgavimab on humoral responses and on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in vaccine-refractory patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) at high risk of severe COVID-19.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed on a cohort of high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID patients treated with a single dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (150 mg/150 mg). COVID-19 outcomes as well as serum and salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were assessed at baseline and for at least 6 months. Results were compared with an untreated high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of COVID-19 compared with the general population were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 38 high-risk IMID patients received tixagevimab/cilgavimab and were compared with 114 untreated high-risk IMID controls. Serum anti-spike IgG increased to 6.6 OD (s.d. 0.8) at day 1 and remained positive up to month 6 [6.3 OD (s.d. 1.4)]. Salivary anti-spike IgG peaked at month 2 [1.6 OD (s.d. 1.1)] and decreased from month 3 [0.8 OD (s.d. 0.3)]. No severe or extended infection was observed in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group. Compared with the general population, the SIR of COVID-19 in treated patients was 0.76 (95% CI 0.24, 1.58) despite the increased risk profile. The SIR of the control group was 1.51 (95% CI 1.07, 2.02), corresponding to a significantly increased incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Passive immunization with tixagevimab/cilgavimab is safe and effective in inducing anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity and potentially in preventing COVID-19 in high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID patients. These data provide a proof of concept for the use of monoclonal antibodies as a preventative strategy against SARS-CoV-2 in vulnerable populations.

CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Treatment: Unraveling the Role of B Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

B cell generation of autoantibodies is a crucial step in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). After their differentiation in the bone marrow, B cells populate the secondary lymphatic organs, where they undergo further maturation leading to the development of memory B cells as well as antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells. Targeting B cells is an important strategy to treat autoimmune diseases such as SLE, in which B cell tolerance is disturbed and autoimmune B cells and autoantibodies emerge. This review discusses the functional aspects of antibody- and cell-based B cell-depleting therapy in SLE. It thereby particularly focuses on lessons learned from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell treatment on the role of B cells in SLE for understanding B cell pathology in SLE. CAR T cells model a deep B cell depletion and thereby allow understanding the role of aberrant B cell activation in the pathogenesis of SLE. Furthermore, the effects of B cell depletion on autoantibody production can be better described, ie, explaining the concept of different cellular sources of (auto-) antibodies in the form of short-lived plasmablasts and long-lived plasma cells, which differ in their susceptibility to B cell depletion and require different targeted therapeutic approaches. Finally, the safety of deep B cell depletion in autoimmune disease is discussed.

Tolerability of low to moderate biomechanical stress during leisure sport activity in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of low to moderate biomechanical stress on entheses in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective interventional study on a cohort of psoriasis and PsA patients who underwent a 60 min badminton training session. Pain assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), physical examination of 29 entheses (SPARCC, LEI, MASES) and bilateral ultrasound at the lateral humeral epicondyle, inferior patellar pole and Achilles tendon were performed before and after training. Ultrasound changes were assessed using the OMERACT scoring system. A follow-up assessment of pain and adverse events was performed at 1 week.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included (n=7 PsA; n=9 psoriasis) and 196 entheseal ultrasound scans were acquired. At baseline, median VAS pain (IQR) was 0.5 cm (0-2.3) and the total number of tender entheses was 12/464. Mean (min; max) Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis was 6.1 (0.8; 19) and 5/7 PsA patients had an Minimal Disease Activity status. After training, no significant change in VAS pain (0.0 cm (0.0-2.0)) nor in tender entheses (13/464) emerged. Four patients (n=2 PsA, n=2 psoriasis) developed a grade-1 power Doppler-signal at six entheses, which, however, remained non-tender. At 1 week, median VAS pain remained stable (0.0 cm (0.0-3.0); p>0.05) and only one participant with active PsA at baseline reported increased arthralgias in three joints.

CONCLUSIONS

Low to moderate physical strain, as in the context of leisure sport activity, seems well tolerated in psoriatic patients without increases in tenderness, pain and ultrasound-proven inflammation. Evidence-based recommendations for physical activity in PsA are direly needed and larger controlled studies should be conducted to define safe exercise thresholds.

Baricitinib Improves Bone Properties and Biomechanics in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of the Prospective Interventional BARE BONE Trial

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by erosive joint damage, deterioration of bone mass, and biomechanics. Preclinical evidence suggests a beneficial effect of Janus kinase inhibition (JAKi) on bone properties, but clinical data are scarce to date. In this study, we evaluated the effect of JAKi through baricitinib (BARI) on 1) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone microstructure, biomechanics, and erosion repair and 2) synovial inflammation in RA patients.

METHODS

Prospective, single-arm, interventional, open-label, single-center phase 4 study in RA patients with pathological bone status and clinical indication of JAKi (BARE BONE trial). Participants received BARI (4 mg/day) over 52 weeks. To assess bone properties and synovial inflammation, high-resolution computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline (BL), week 24, and week 52. Clinical response and safety were monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty RA patients were included. BARI significantly improved disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 4.82 ± 0.90 to 2.71 ± 0.83) and synovial inflammation (RAMRIS synovitis score: 5.3 [4.2] to 2.7 [3.5]). We observed a significant improvement in trabecular vBMD with a mean change of 6.11 mgHA/mm3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.01-12.26). Biomechanical properties also improved with mean change from baseline in estimated stiffness of 2.28 kN/mm (95% CI 0.30-4.25) and estimated failure load of 98.8 N (95% CI 15.9-181.7). The number and size of erosions in the metacarpal joints remained stable. No new safety signals with BARI treatment were observed.

CONCLUSION

Bones of RA patients improve with BARI therapy, as shown by an increase in trabecular bone mass and an improvement of biomechanical properties.

Rationale, current state and opportunities in combining biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

The advent of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has considerably improved patient outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. However, not all patients reach the state of remission, as disease can be resistant even to single cytokine inhibition by bDMARDs. Simultaneous or sequential inhibition of multiple cytokines may be considered in situations where disease control is not adequate under singular inhibition of cytokines. Although there have been some disappointing experiences in the past with combination of bDMARDs, the ongoing improvement of our understanding about inflammatory pathways and the overall better safety understanding of bDMARDs seem to make new biologic treatment combinations possible. This review covers the rationale and current evidence for bDMARDs combination in inflammatory arthritis.

Pulmonary involvement in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: A single center experience from Turkey

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary involvement is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the type and frequency of pulmonary involvement and investigate the potential relationship between thorax computed tomography (CT) signs and other systemic clinical findings in AAV.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients over the age of 18 and diagnosed with AAV were included in this study. Thoracic CT imaging findings and clinical features of the patients at the time of diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated. The frequency and distribution of detected pathological findings on imaging according to disease types, in addition to the relationship of these findings with other systemic findings and disease severity, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 63 patients, 50 (79.4%) had pulmonary symptoms at the time of presentation. Most frequently observed pulmonary finding of thorax CT was nodular opacity. Consolidation, cavitary nodules, bronchiectasis, emphysema and fibrotic sequelae change were more common in the patients with diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Honeycomb, atelectasis, interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary venous congestion and pleural effusion were more common in the patients with diagnosis of microscopic polyangiitis. Ground-glass appearance, central airway disease, peribronchovascular nodules, pericardial effusion and lymphatic adenomegaly (>10 mm) were more common in the patients with diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hemorrhage and severe lung involvement were found significantly increased in patients with myeloperoxidase antibody (MPO)-ANCA positivity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lung involvement was detected in almost all of the patients with AAV. Both interstitial lung disease and severe lung involvement were more frequently found in patients with MPO-ANCA positivity compared to other patients. Pulmonary examination by an imaging technique in all patients with AAV may be useful to determine the vasculitis subtype and to determine the extent of the disease.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

Pulmonary involvement is quite common in AAV. Every patient with suspected AAV should be examined with imaging for lung involvement, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. Severe pulmonary involvement is associated with the presence of severe disease and MPO-ANCA positivity.

Dermatomyositis associated with thymoma: A case report and literature review

Abstract

Thymoma can present with paraneoplastic-autoimmune neuro-muscular disorders, including polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and granulomatous myositis. Rarely, concomitant subclinical myasthenia gravis (MG) can be a diagnostic dilemma and cause deleterious outcomes regarding missed or delayed diagnosis. We report a Turkish patient presented with thymoma associated dermatomyositis and positive acetylcholine receptor antibody without evident MG clinic.

VEXAS syndrome with severe multisystem involvement: Rapid recovery after splenectomy

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a newly defined disorder in which treatment is still unclear. Herein, a patient with VEXAS syndrome who had atypical findings and an interesting treatment course is presented as a case report. He had fatigue, recurrent fever, pulmonary infiltrates, proteinuria, anemia, leucopenia, transient skin rush and increased acute phase reactants. The patient, who could not tolerate corticosteroid tapering, recovered rapidly after diagnostic splenectomy and the pathological examination of the spleen revealed significant findings.

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases developed after COVID-19 vaccination: presentation of a case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

An increasing number of new on-set autoimmune-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) after COVID-19 vaccination has begun to be reported in the literature. In this article, we present our patients with new-onset AIRD after vaccination for COVID-19 and review the literature on the subject.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of previously described "newly developed AIRD in individuals recently vaccinated for COVID-19", in 22 cases vaccinated with one of the COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 or CoronaVac) approved in our country.

RESULTS

We collected 22 cases (14 female, 63.6%) that developed an AIRD after COVID-19 vaccination. Mean age was 53±14.4 (24-87) years. The interval between the last dose of vaccination and the development of the first complaint was 23.9±19.5 (4-90) days. CoronaVac was administered to four patients, and the BNT162b2 to 18 patients. AIRD-related symptoms developed in 12 patients after the first dose, in 8 patients after the second dose, and in two patients after the third dose. Twelve out of the 22 (54.5%) cases were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, two with SLE, and the remaining eight patients each with leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Sjogren's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and inflammatory myositis, respectively. Six patients had a history of documented antecedent COVID-19 infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases may develop after COVID-19 vaccinations. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination should be questioned carefully in newly diagnosed AIRD patients.

Efficacy of anticytokine treatments added to corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia and hyperinflammation: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Pneumonia and hyperinflammatory state related to COVID-19 infection are fatal clinical conditions without definite treatment modalities. Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-1 targeted therapies have been proposed as treatment options. This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of anakinra and tocilizumab added to corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia and hyper-inflammatory syndrome in our tertiary clinical center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia and hyperinflammatory state who did not respond to initial treatments, including corticosteroids, were included in the study. The patients' electronic records were reviewed retrospectively and recorded according to a standardized data table. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with intubation.

RESULTS

388 patients were included in the study. 197 patients were intubated and most of them died (n=194/197, 98%). 67 patients received tocilizumab, and 97 patients received anakinra. Anakinra [OR: 0.440, 95% CI=0.244-0.794, p=0.006] and tocilizumab [OR: 0.491, 95% CI=0.256-0.943, p=0.033] were both associated with a decreased risk for intubation. However, having a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥ 10 [OR: 2.035, 95% CI=1.143-3.623, p=0.016], serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥ 400 [OR: 3.160, 95% CI=1.937-5.156, p<0.001] and age ≥ 50 [OR: 4.048, 95% CI=2.037-8.043, p < 0.001] was associated with an increased risk for intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anakinra and tocilizumab, added to initial standard COVID-19 treatments (including glucocorticoids) reduced the need for intubation in patients with COVID-19-associated severe pneumonia and hyperinflammatory syndrome. Given the high mortality rate of intubated patients with COVID-19, both treatments may have added benefits on mortality.

Intensity and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease: a prospective cohort study

Background

Concerns have been raised about the reduced immunogenicity of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and the higher risk of breakthrough infections. The objective of our study was to investigate the intensity and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and to assess the effects of diagnosis, treatment, and adapted vaccination schedules.

Methods

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was measured over time in a large prospective cohort of healthy controls and participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (attending or admitted to affiliated centres) between Dec 15, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021. Cohort participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and control participants with no diagnosis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, were eligible for this analysis. Demographic data and disease-specific data were collected using a questionnaire. Humoral response was compared across treatment and disease groups, and with respect to the receipt of additional vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was measured by ELISA using optical density ratio units and modelled over time with age and sex adjustment using mixed-effects models. Using these models, marginal mean antibody titres and marginal risks of a poor response (optical density ratio <1·1) were calculated for each week starting from week 8 after the first vaccination to week 40.

Findings

Among 5076 individuals registered, 2535 participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (mean age 55·0 [15·2] years; 1494 [58·9%] women and 1041 [41·1%] men) and 1198 healthy controls (mean age 40·7 [13·5] years; 554 [46·2%] women and 644 [53·8%] men) were included in this analysis. Mean antibody titres were higher in healthy controls compared with people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases at all timepoints, with a peak antibody response in healthy controls (mean optical density ratio 12·48; 95% CI 11·50–13·53) of more than twice that in participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (5·50; 5·23–5·77; mean difference 6·98; 5·92–8·04). A poor response to vaccination was observed in participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were taking B-cell inhibitors (peak mean difference from healthy controls 11·68; 10·07–13·29) and T-cell inhibitors (peakmean difference from healthy controls 10·43; 8·33–12·53). Mean differences in antibody responses between different immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were small. Participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were given a third vaccine dose had higher mean antibody titres than did healthy controls vaccinated with two vaccine doses at 40 weeks after the initial vaccination (mean difference 1·34; 0·01–2·69).

Interpretation

People with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases show a lower and less durable SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response and are at risk of losing humoral immune protection. Adjusted vaccination schedules with earlier booster doses or more frequent re-doses, or both, could better protect people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, European Research Council, Innovative Medicine Initiative, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Else Kröner-Memorial Foundation.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19 pneumonia in a rituximab treated patient with systemic sclerosis—A case report and literature review

Patients with immune-mediated diseases (IMID) such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), who are treated with B cell depleting treatments, are at risk for developing severe COVID-19 due to inadequate humoral immune response. During B cell depletion, therapeutic substitution of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (mAbs) might be helpful to prevent severe COVID-19. It has been shown, that in non-IMID patients mABs reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load and lower the risk of COVID-19 associated hospitalization or death. However, there are limited data on the effect of mAbs in IMID patients after exposure, especially in patients treated with B cell depleting agents. Herein, we report a case of a rituximab treated SSc patient who developed COVID-19 and was successfully treated with a combination of mAbs (casirivimab/imdevimab). With this case we show that IMID patients may benefit from post-exposure administration of mAbs. In our case treatment with neutralizing autoantibodies was safe and a possible contributor in protecting the patient from mechanical ventilation and eventually death. We frame this case within the current evidence from the literature and provide a perspective on the future potential role of mAbs for treating IMID patients suffering from COVID-19.