Assessment of PD-1 and PD-L1 tissue expression levels in lichen planus patients: a case-control study

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint protein, PD-1 interaction with PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) is essential for maintaining immunological tolerance. The study aimed to study and compare the levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in lesional and nonlesional skin of lichen planus (LP) patients and compare these levels to normal healthy controls to assess their role in the pathogenesis of LP. This case-control study involved 30 patients with LP and 30 healthy age-and sex-matched controls. After clinical assessment of the severity by LP severity index score (LPSI), skin biopsies were taken from lesional and nonlesional skin of LP patients and from normal skin in healthy controls for assessment of the tissue levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 by ELISA. The tissue levels of both PD-1 and PD-L1 were significantly higher in healthy controls than in both lesional and nonlesional skin of LP patients (P < 0.001). Also, significantly higher PD-l and PD-L1 levels in nonlesional skin than in lesional skin of LP patients were reported (P < 0.001). No significant correlations were found between lesional and nonlesional PD-1, PD-L1 levels, or LPSI score. Based on the fact that PD-1/PD-L1 interaction is important to maintain tolerance and protection against autoimmune diseases, in addition to our study results that revealed lower levels of PD-1/PD-L1 in LP skin than in healthy skin, we can conclude that PD-1/PDL-1 may be incriminated in the pathogenesis of LP. ClinicalTrials.govID: NCT04892381.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Lichen Planus Pemphigoides in a Patient with Metastatic Adrenocortical Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

While the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have also been on the rise. Cutaneous toxicities are among the most common irAEs, especially in the context of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors like pembrolizumab. Herein, we report a case of anti-PD-1-induced lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP)-a rare autoimmune blistering disorder with characteristics of both lichen planus and bullous pemphigoid. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of LPP following anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic adrenocortical cancer. Recognizing that LPP is within the spectrum of irAEs is important, especially as the indications for immunotherapy grow to include rarer malignancies like adrenocortical cancer. In addition to our case presentation, we also provide a comprehensive review of the literature surrounding immunotherapy-induced LPP-highlighting key characteristics towards the early recognition and clinical management of this cutaneous irAE.

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in cancer patients treated by immunotherapy: a literature review and Italian multicentric experience

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events are frequently associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administration in cancer patients. In fact, these monoclonal antibodies bind the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 leading to a non-specific activation of the immune system against both tumoral cells and self-antigens. The skin is the most frequently affected organ system appearing involved especially by inflammatory manifestations such as maculopapular, lichenoid, psoriatic, and eczematous eruptions. Although less common, ICI-induced autoimmune blistering diseases have also been reported, with an estimated overall incidence of less than 5%. Bullous pemphigoid-like eruption is the predominant phenotype, while lichen planus pemphigoides, pemphigus vulgaris, and mucous membrane pemphigoid have been described anecdotally. Overall, they have a wide range of clinical presentations and often overlap with each other leading to a delayed diagnosis. Achieving adequate control of skin toxicity in these cases often requires immunosuppressive systemic therapies and/or interruption of ICI treatment, presenting a therapeutic challenge in the context of cancer management. In this study, we present a case series from Italy based on a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, which included 45 patients treated with ICIs who developed ICI-induced bullous pemphigoid. In addition, we performed a comprehensive review to identify the cases reported in the literature on ICI-induced autoimmune bullous diseases. Several theories seeking their underlying pathogenesis have been reported and this work aims to better understand what is known so far on this issue.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid

Background

Pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint inhibitor, is a novel drug used to treat a variety of advanced malignancies. However, it can also result in many immune-related adverse events, with cutaneous toxicities being the most frequent. Regarding pembrolizumab-induced skin adverse reactions, bullous pemphigoid (BP) has the worst effects on quality of life. Recently, there have been more and more reports of BP incidents resulting from pembrolizumab therapy in patients with cancer. This study aimed to define the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and management of pembrolizumab-induced BP and identify potential differences between classical BP and pembrolizumab-induced BP.

Methods

Case reports, case series, and case analyses of pembrolizumab-induced BP up to 10 December 2022 were collected for retrospective analysis.

Results

Our study included 47 patients (33 males and 14 females) from 40 studies. The median age was 72 years (range 42-86 years). The median time to cutaneous toxicity was 4 months (range 0.7-28 months), and the median time to bullae formation was 7.35 months (range 0.7-32 months). The most common clinical features were tense bullae and blisters (85.11%), pruritus (72.34%), and erythema (63.83%) on the limbs and trunk. In 20 of the 22 cases tested, the serum anti-BP180 autoantibodies were positive. However, in 10 cases (91.90%, 10/11) the circulating autoantibodies of anti-BP230 were negative. 40 patients had skin biopsies and the skin biopsy revealed subepidermal bullae or blister eosinophil infiltration in 75.00% of patients with pembrolizumab-induced BP, 10.00% of patients with lymphocyte infiltration and 20.00% of patients with neutrophil infiltration. There were 20 patients (50%) with eosinophilic infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels, 8 patients (20.00%) with lymphocyte infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels, and 4 patients (10.00%) with neutrophil infiltration around the superficial dermis vessels. Direct immunofluorescence detected linear immunoglobulin G (IgG) IgG and/or complement C3 along the dermo-epidermal junction in 36 patients (94.74%) with BP. IgG positivity was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in 81.82% of patients with BP. All patients were in complete remission (95.65%,44/46) or partial remission (4.35%, 2/46) of BP, whereas 9/46 patients had a relapse or refractory. The majority of patients achieved BP remission after discontinuation of pembrolizumab with a combination of topically and systemically administered steroid treatments, or other medications. The median duration of BP remission was 2 months (range 0.3-15 months).

Conclusion

A thorough diagnosis of pembrolizumab-induced BP should be made using clinical signs, biochemical markers, histopathological and immunopathological tests. Pembrolizumab-induced BP had similar clinical characteristics to classic BP. Temporary or permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab therapy may be required in patients with perbolizumab-induced BP depending on the severity of BP and the response to medication. Pembrolizumab-induced BP may be effectively treated using topical and systemic steroid treatments in combination with other medications (e.g., doxycycline, niacinamide, dapsone, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, dupilumab, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and infliximab). Clinicians should provide better management to patients with BP receiving pembrolizumab to prevent progression and ensure continuous cancer treatment.

Bullous Pemphigoid in Patients Receiving Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors and Psoriatic Patients-Focus on Clinical and Histopathological Variation

BACKGROUND

The most common autoimmune blistering disease, bullous pemphigoid (BP), shows an increased prevalence in psoriatic patients and oncologic patients undergoing immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). Even though the same autoantigens (BP180/BP230) are detectable, it remains obscure whether clinical or histopathological differences exist between these different groups of BP patients. In this study, we strived to analyze this matter based on own data and previously published reports.

METHODS

We performed an institutional chart review from 2010-2020 to identify BP patients with psoriasis (n = 6) or underlying ICB (n = 4) and matched them with idiopathic cases of BP (n = 33). We compared clinical characteristics, subtypes, and dermatopathological determinants (e.g., tissue eosinophilia/neutrophilia, papillary edema, lymphocytic infiltration) among the groups.

RESULTS

ICB-associated BP affects men more often and might show mucosal involvement more frequently. We found no statistically significant dermatopathological differences among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of an increased risk of BP in patients with psoriasis and oncologic patients receiving ICB; atypical pruritic skin lesions should prompt a workup including a skin biopsy for histopathology and direct immunofluorescence in these patients. Larger studies might be necessary to detect slight dermatopathological variation.

Lichen Planus Pemphigoides: a unique form of bullous and lichenoid eruptions secondary to nivolumab

The widespread use of PD‐1 inhibitors to treat various solid tumors has brought certain challenges for the clinician, including immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous toxicities are among the most observed irAEs. Bullous and lichenoid dermatoses following PD‐1 inhibitor therapy have been described. Here we report a novel case of lichen planus pemphigoides, featuring characteristics of both bullous pemphigoid and lichen planus, in a patient treated with nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma. We subsequently review all three cutaneous conditions which may arise in the context of PD‐1 inhibitor therapy.

Challenges and pitfalls between lichen planus pemphigoides and bullous lichen planus

Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) and bullous lichen planus (BLP) are rare dermatoses, which are characterised by blisters and lichenoid lesions. Their clinical presentation is heterogenous, displaying overlapping features or mimicking other dermatological diseases. Therefore, diagnosis can often be challenging, requiring a thorough dermatological examination along with distinctive histological and immunopathological characteristics. Lichenoid degeneration of the basal epidermis exposes various antigens of the dermal-epidermal junction in LPP, resulting in the breakdown of immune tolerance, hence, the production of autoantibodies against type XVII collagen. Conversely, no pathogenic autoantibodies are detected in BLP. However, some cases of mucosal lichen planus might display immunopathological features suggestive of autoimmune blistering diseases. Therefore, a better understanding of the pathophysiology of these two distinct dermatoses is imperative. The aim of this review was to provide a summary of the current knowledge on the clinical hallmarks, diagnosis and available therapeutic options in LPP and BLP.

Adverse cutaneous toxicities by PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Surveillance

Introduction-The therapeutic use of humanized monoclonal programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) (pembrolizumab, and nivolumab) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) as potent anticancer therapies is rapidly increasing. The mechanism of signaling of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 involves triggering cytotoxic CD4+/CD8 + T cell activation and subsequent abolition of cancer cells which induces specific immunologic adverse events that are specific to these therapies. These drugs can cause numerous cutaneous reactions and are characterized as the most frequent immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Majority of cutaneous irAEs range from nonspecific eruptions to detectible skin manifestations, which may be self-limiting and present acceptable skin toxicity profiles, while some may produce life-threatening complications.Objective-.This review aims to illuminate the associated cutaneous irAEs related to drugs used in oncology along with the relevant mechanism(s) and management.Areas covered-Literature was searched using various databases including Pub-Med, Google Scholar, and Medline. The search mainly involved research articles, retrospective studies, case reports, and clinicopathological findings. With this review article, an overview of the cutaneous irAEs with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, as well as suggestions, have been provided, so that their recognition at early stages could help in better management and would prevent treatment discontinuation.Article highlightsCutaneous adverse effects are the most prevalent immune-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint antibodies.Cutaneous toxicities mainly manifest in the form of maculopapular rash and pruritus.More specific cutaneous complications can also occur, including vitiligo, worsened psoriasis, lichenoid dermatitis, mucosal involvement (e.g., oral lichenoid reaction), dermatomyositis, lupus erythematosus.Cutaneous manifestations can be life-threatening including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Dermatologic toxicities are usually mild, readily manageable, and rarely result in significant morbidity.Adequate management of the cutaneous adverse event and recognition in early stages could lead to the prevention of worsening of the lesions and limit treatment disruption.